Diary Blog, 21 September 2023, with material about freedom of expression, Russell Brand, Caroline Dinenage, and 77th Brigade

Morning music

[Cloisters, Gloucester Cathedral]

Battles past

Caroline Dinenage, Russell Brand, the 77th Brigade, and freedom of expression

A sign of the times, at one with bank staff deciding to “de-bank” (cut off banking services from) people with the “wrong” sort of socio-political views, and the UK police taking the side of the corruptors of society, and getting involved in the persecution and prosecution of people such as myself who are trying to defend European civilization and culture.

Caroline Dinenage seems to have written to other persons and organizations in the same way:

Caroline Dinenage, however, has less influence than she seems to think:

Of course, the hell of this sort of situation is that one is forced to defend, by default, persons for whom one has no liking —or even interest— in general, such as Russell Brand.

Interesting. Having never taken any interest in Caroline Dinenage, I had no idea that she was that kind of slut. Still, who knows the ins and out of such situations, which would usually be considered part of a politician’s purely personal life, and not usually a matter for public discussion. Things happen, as they say…

In the interests of fairness, I should add that at least she belongs to Conservatives Against Foxhunting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Dinenage.

Interestingly, Caroline Dineage’s present husband, Mark Lancaster, a former Conservative Party MP who, despite his own apparently-bad behaviour, now sits in the House of Lords as Baron Lancaster of Kimbolton, was 2-i-c of the “dark arts” 77th Brigade for two years (2018-2020), and carried the rank of Colonel.

Lancaster, who was a mere 2nd Lieutenant when serving for 2 years in the regular Army (Royal Engineers, 1988-1990), afterwards achieved regular seniority in the TA (now, the Reserves), and completed three tours of active service overseas. He is now Director, Reserves, and carries the rank of Major-General.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Lancaster,_Baron_Lancaster_of_Kimbolton;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Lancaster,_Baron_Lancaster_of_Kimbolton#Military_career

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/77th_Brigade_(United_Kingdom);

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/77th_Brigade_(United_Kingdom)#Role_and_composition.

[Mark Lancaster, Baron Lancaster of Kimbolton, photographed wearing uniform bearing the insignia of a Lieutenant-Colonel of the British Army]

So we have Caroline Dinenage who is Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport, and then her husband, a Conservative life peer who was second-in-command of 77th Brigade and its interference with Internet information and/or disinformation.

Then we have the “cancellation” of the admittedly unpleasant Russell Brand who, however, has apparently been on a socio-political journey placing him in opposition to the “dark powers” who have such influence in our society.

In relation to the “cancellation” of the Russell Brand character, and the letters and emails sent by Caroline Dinenage, that is all rather relevant, nicht wahr? I wonder whether I am the first person to have spotted the linkage.

More tweets seen

The System is using Brand as a kind of stalking horse; to put it another way, taking down the low-hanging fruit, i.e. the easy targets first…

Incidentally, I see that, whether via the reading of my blog or independently, hundreds of tweeters are now (several hours after the start of today’s blog was published) mentioning the Caroline Dinenage/Mark Lancaster/77th Brigade connection, as seen in some of the following tweets:

Not 100% right; it was 2018-2020.

Some tweeters are taking an even-more-conspiratorial line:

“The wilderness of mirrors”…

As some cartoonists’ captions said after Germany passed the world’s first law banning cruel experiments on animals, in 1933 (sadly repealed after the disaster of 1945), “even the animals support the Fuhrer!“.

[“Heil Goering“, a reference to the 1933 anti-vivisection law in Germany]

From the newspapers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12545075/Ukraines-leader-arrives-Congress-convince-Republican-lawmakers-continue-giving-aid-Poland-axed-weapon-supplies-boost-Putin.html.

…doubts are growing over the future of US assistance, with hardline Republicans saying they won’t approve funding to prevent a US government shutdown if it includes aid for Ukraine.

Zelensky’s trip to Washington – his second during wartime – is a dramatic departure from the first in December 2022, when he secretly flew in and received a hero’s welcome at the White House and on Capitol Hill. 

This time he is desperate to drum up support and win over skeptical lawmakers, insisting that Kyiv needs continued funding as well as a beefing up of air defences after Moscow hit Ukraine with another barrage of missiles overnight. 

The Ukrainian leader is under added pressure to secure US support after Poland sensationally declared it would no longer arm Ukraine amid a row over grain exports in a move sure to delight Russian President Vladimir Putin.”

[Daily Mail]

Take away Zelensky’s ricebowl. As to Poland, it should keep those weapons for Poland’s own use; that might be necessary if the NWO/ZOG powers keep stoking the new Cold War/hot war.

More tweets

For once, I agree with Piers Morgan, but what a prize hypocrite! Morgan wanted to enforce the dangerous pseudo-vaccines for “Covid”, and to criminalize and socially-penalize those aware and intelligent enough to see through the weaponization of the virus by the transnational conspiracy.

Sooner or later, these msm liars are going to have to be dealt with. A thoroughgoing purge not only of the msm but also of publishing, politics, law and the legal professions, the police, even SIS and the Security Service.

BBC Newsnight

I happened to see a 10-minute report from BBC Newsnight about the protests in Wales and elsewhere around the migration invasion and, especially, protests caused by the commandeering of hotels to house the migrant-invaders.

What can one say? A rehash, pretty much, of all the similar dog***t TV reports on the so-called “far right” that I have ever seen, going right back to the mid-1970s. The only difference was the cross-Channel boat invasion aspect. In the past, we had an effective Navy, Coastguard, and police force (and courts), and were not being quite literally invaded by hundreds each day in small boats.

As always with such dull repetitive reports on TV, the assumption from the start is that anyone who wants to stop the migration-invasion is bad through and through, and the TV drone “reporting” (always) rubs that in with suggestions that (“ooh!“) some people actually think that Adolf Hitler was in many ways a positive influence, and that (“ooh!“) it might have been a good idea had the Second World War never happened. And so on.

Another aspect of Newsnight’s “report” which has been part of pretty much every similar TV show I have seen from 1975 to the present is the “honest local person” who has legitimate (minor) grievances (ie that could, it is implied, be dealt with by better admin etc) about matters such as migrant-invaders being housed in local hotels. Such “honest locals” invariably (as in the Newsnight report) decry any “far right” “infiltration” into their local protests.

This is what the Soviet Press and TV used to do. By all means protest (quietly) locally, and ask the Government to do things better, but do not question the whole policy, or the agenda behind it. In this case, yes, by all means protest about your local hotel being taken over, but do not say that the migration-invasion should be stopped, and do not protest about the black-brown migrant-invaders on a national or racial basis, and do not ask what is the agenda behind the migration-invasion (the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, in this case).

In the Newsnight report, there were two approved “honest locals” in two places, one an exhibitionistic fat woman who is, apparently, a local councillor in the Wigan area. She deplored the way “her” protest was “infiltrated” (ie outnumbered) by Patriotic Alternative and other protesters.

Needless to say, the views of the Patriotic Alternative and other people were only given briefly, and in such a way that they could be trashed.

There were two (if you like) “expert witnesses” as well: fat cat “Conservative” truffle-snuffler Tim Loughton (a noted expenses freeloader: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Loughton), who thought that the people who had to be, as he put it, “guarded against” were not the migrant-invaders but the “far right”…

The other “expert” was the egregious Neil Basu, a mixed-race ex-policeman whose chosen role (apart from expostulating about “racism”) is that of “counter-terrorism” etc. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Basu.

Basu seemed to be saying that anyone alive to the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, or who wants an end to the migration-invasion (which must surely destroy our society within one or two generations) is a “terrorist“.

It is that kind of muddled thinking that has led the UK police to where they are today— almost useless at their proper job, while (many of them) spend their time on duty playing at “counter-terrorism” and acting like a poundland KGB, as I blogged 5 years ago: see https://ianrobertmillard.org/2018/05/30/one-mans-extremism-is-another-mans-struggle-for-liberty-and-justice/.

Late tweets

In the Zaporozhye region, the Ukrainian army launched new attacks in the Orekhov-Rabotino sector. The Ukrainian Armed Forces are intensifying their attacks to break through the anti-tank ditch and reach Verbovoye, but there are no signs of previous massive attacks. A large number of infantry groups of 10 to 15 people are trying to advance under Russian artillery and tank fire. Half of them are scattered during the advance stages, and the rest are destroyed by mortars, grenade launchers and FPV drones after reaching the ditch.”

Zelensky knows that the only hope for the Kiev regime is to drag NATO into direct war with Russia, though that would trigger a major European war, and quite possibly an East-West nuclear exchange.

Late music

16 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 21 September 2023, with material about freedom of expression, Russell Brand, Caroline Dinenage, and 77th Brigade”

  1. That Caroline Whatever (I could not understand/spell her f… surname) is a truly hateful character; a kind of British version of a NKVD senior officer in Stalin’s time.

    Russell Brand was an unpleasant/obnoxious character but over the last 3 years he understood or learned certain truths and has been fairly vocal about them. That, of course, does not make him a hero or a nice person (far from it) but he has nearly 6 million followers and therefore a considerable influence on the public.

    Perhaps this radicalizes him, however, he knows very well which side his toast is buttered and he NEVER will say a word against (((the usual suspects)))

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Loved the cat giving the NS salute! (LOL) Funny enough, he is fur is a blend of ginger and light brown; that makes him an SA member (LOL) I have to say that “Horst Wessel Lied” would have been better than “Erika”; as it is a political song. Anyway, well done! “Even the animals support the Führer!” 😂​😂​😂​

    Like

  3. This is a very good video of Russell Brand, what he says about the American political system, George W. Bush and the globalist agenda could have been said by us. He was skating on thin ice…

    Like

  4. Russell Brand was one of those marching with HnH (the State sponsored and organised hit squad) against ethnonationalists who were protesting against the Pakistani rape gangs. He is a vile and degenerate turd. He is pro replacement migration from the Third World.

    That he might have raised some objections to state tyranny over ConVID, but he’s very much part of the promotion of degeneracy by the Money Power. How else could such a talentless man have been promoted by the MSM (in full knowledge of who and what he was) so far beyond whatever meagre ‘talent’ he may have possessed?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. HennyPenny:
      I think that that sounds right. The question that remains is whether he started to go “off message”, or was told to change his message.

      Despite the superficial articulacy (seen by me only when he made his narcissistic appearance before a Select Committee in the House of Commons a decade ago), I do not see genuine intelligence or —still less— erudition there.

      I admit again that I have taken little interest in him since he emerged from obscurity. I notice that he was first promoted by a Jew called Klarsfeld, but of course Jews have a stranglehold over that trade (show business representation).

      In the end, Russell Brand has nothing original to say, as far as I can see anyway.

      Like

      1. It’s almost perfect for the System that the notionally ‘conservative’ commentators have elevated this filthy degenerate and race betrayer (Brand) as some sort of hero for ‘liberty’ and ‘freedom’ with his rather recent outspoken criticism of the System, and now this ‘hero’ is being defenestrated with the exposure of his degeneracy (which the MSM has known about for all these years, but kept it secret). It’s just all too convenient. It’s as if he was put up to it in order to be destroyed, leaving his licksplittle devotees in the ‘conservative movement’ looking absolutely ridiculous and stupid (which they are).

        Like

    2. Thank you for the information about RB’s earlier activities, I knew he was a vulgar rabble-rouser and a leftie but I only started to listen to him (occasionally) 3 years ago as he began to speak against lockdowns and the vaccines. I did not know he was such a bastard as to support “HnH”, but it all makes sense.

      Russell Brand is another proof that the old saying “The enemy of my enemies is my friend” is an idiotic fallacy. At most a person like him will be a momentary ally, but that is all. If I learned something from the study of history and especially of military history is that, in times of war, you use all the means available and you could/should ally yourself with people you may despise as long as they can be useful to you.

      RB is being attack not because who he is but because what he has been saying over the last three years. Even if his persona is disagreeable or despicable, he should be supported as he is driving a wedge into the enemy’s camp. Also, he is just a pawn in the game, they will use him as an example but later on they will go for really valuable, genuinely patriotic persons.

      Like

Leave a comment