Why actually have such untermenschen in our society at all?
I want to create a more evolved, “higher” and/or “better” society. That requires a population of highly-evolved people as a foundation. Britain, though, is struggling with literally millions of backward humanoids, who have no place even in our existing society, let alone a more advanced future one.
Read the above, and say whether a suspended sentence (for all three defendants) was the right choice…
The sentencing judge said:
“(Your victim) was bullied mercilessly over the course of a protracted and persistent incident.
“You Moore, hit her, and her nose started to bleed. You, McCrudden and Hallam then persisted in a significant and violent assault on her, during which she had items thrown at her.
“She was at one point forced into a cupboard where she was required to stay for 20 minutes. She was ordered into a dog cage but she did not go. She was ragged around by you, Moore.
“Also, not by either of you, she was kicked in the head while she was in a ball.
“This was cowardly behaviour by three people on one person, which was prolonged, sustained assault by all three females present.
“As a result she was a complete mess. She left the house with half her clothes missing, bleeding and bruised.
“It was aggravated by the gratuitous degradation that she suffered and it was an offence committed while all three of you were under the influence of drink and drugs…
“I have no hesitation in considering the offence so serious that only a custodial sentence is appropriate – this being a sustained and serious assault.” [Daily Mirror].
How on Earth can a suspended sentence ever be right in such a case? Answer: it cannot be. That judge said the right things, but (like many others) failed to follow through. The defendants were also both drugged and drunk at the time, a fact which (as in the old Soviet Union) should be regarded as having aggravated their culpability, and should have resulted in a harsher sentence (The judge did make that point, but empty words are not enough).
The British people need something better than this.
God…look at that bunch of clowns…made even more risible by the stupid facemasks. What a pack of cretins.
Jesus H. Christ! The UK has wasted tens of BILLIONS on “Covid” stuff (unused pop-up “hospitals”, the £37BN test and trace fiasco, the facemask nonsense, all the unnecessary restrictions…and here is a 29p tablet that cuts hospitalizations by a third!
…and the puppets, and “useful idiots”, who pull in the punters— Greta Nut, Extinction Rebellion, Insulate Britain (etc).
At first, I regarded Professor Ferguson as merely a silly and ineffectual dummy, a view reinforced by the msm kefuffle about his antics with his married “ho” and her illicit visits etc, but now that he has been neither sacked nor (universally) laughed at, and now that he is still being reported on as if he is a serious person, I begin to wonder whether he is not more closely or consciously tied into at least the “biosecurity” part of the transnational conspiracy…
More tweets seen
I was unaware that the Assange extradition hearing was happening. John Pilger [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Pilger] weakens his case by describing Mike Pompeo as a “Herman Goring lookalike“. It is disappointing that Pilger, a journalist for 60 years, misspells the name of a major 20thC figure, Hermann Goering (double “n” in “Hermann”) or Göring.
As for other similarities, there are none. Goering was one of the most cultured members of the generally high-quality NSDAP government of the Reich 1933-1945; Pompeo is a crazed “evangelical” American pseudo-Christian with little culture, and little obvious intelligence outside the purely technical.
I had not taken much interest in Pompeo until today. I have just been reading about him on Wikipedia. What a total loony!
Where will those Americans go? Perhaps it depends on whether they prefer borshch, kim chi, falafel, or chicken soup…
So…a reveller in Ireland has to wear a facemask while standing, or sitting, or arriving, or departing, until or unless actually eating, drinking, or dancing. For me, the prospect of going voluntarily to a nightclub, especially perhaps an Irish one, is unappealing anyway, as well as being a very very remote possibility, but this nonsense will surely put off even those who might enjoy such a ghastly form of diversion…
Another piece of System (NWO/ZOG) propaganda. Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan (conspiracy).
Seems to have little real understanding (or compassion). Sack him.
I have not watched much of the Budget coverage. Talking heads and/or “journalists” (System propagandists) yapping ignorantly and, all the while, smug MP or ex-MP freeloaders (such as David Gauke) seen on Sky TV or BBC talking about “wasting government money” etc (when Gauke himself —among many many others— claimed for everything he could, including tacky furnishings, TV sets, luxury hotel stays etc).
What a bunch of monkeys!
This Government has, of course “wasted money” (UK’s economic resources): £37 BILLION on the ludicrous “test and trace” nonsense alone, headed by incompetent crony Dido Harding. Something that was not even necessary in the first place. That’s more than the projected cost of even the HS2 vanity-rail white elephant.
Imagine what other could have been done with £37BN. Improving the whole rail infrastructure of the country. New hospitals. Libraries, or education generally (I mean real education, not warehousing children in schools, “taught” by ignorant teachers —very often— while the parents work, or jump through bureaucratic hoops).
£37BN works out at around £1,000 for every working-age adult in the UK. In other words, the Treasury could just have given every person in the UK about £1,000, with better results socially and economically.
To put it another way, the most expensive aircraft carrier ever built, the USS Ford, cost about £9 Billion in pounds sterling, so the UK could have had (disregarding running costs) four like that, instead of the useless, pointless, “test and trace” fiasco. Or might have had built about 37 smaller warships.
When you see that part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer, “Boris”, posing as Prime Minister (forget Indian “clever boy”, Rishi Sunak, and the other clowns), you know that the UK political system is terminally sick.
“Criticized“? Yes, but we have seen in recent years what frightens the corrupt and the conspirators, and it is not being “criticized” in official reports.
The “Thalidomide” of our times?
Yesterday, the hugely ignorant Daily Mirror scribbler, Susie Boniface, aka “the Fleet Street Fox” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susie_Boniface] suggested, in a Mirror opinion piece, that “anti-vaxx” protesters should be imprisoned, and generally treated as terrorists. From where did that come? At any rate, an interesting straw in the wind as we approach 2022, the most significant year since 1989 (and, previously, 1956 and 1923). 33-year cycle.
How long before anyone questioning the System narrative and System policies is considered to be a “social terrorist” or “enabler”? Anyone who questions the “panicdemic” narrative. Anyone who opposes the cross-Channel or other migration-invasion. Anyone who questions the power or influence of the Jewish lobby. Anyone seeking a better society. Others…
You can see already the outline of what is taking shape. Look at the Online Harms Bill. Even less free speech than now exists. The Jewish (Zionist) lobby is behind much of the repression.
I wonder what our society will be like in a couple of hundred years if it continues on its present trajectory?
More tweets seen
Alarming that the most powerful military-destructive machine in the world is now controlled, at least notionally, by someone who appears to be a confused, semi-demented, and possibly incontinent person, who may or may not be some kind of child abuser. One can only hope that, if Biden tries to reprise Hilary’s idea, and launch a third world war against Russia (or China), that there is some American version of a chekist standing quietly behind him, pistol always ready to administer a quick coup de grace…
Exactly. UK streets are less safe year on year, but the repression of opinion, including online opinion, is intensifying with every passing year.
As the tweeter says, “wealthy“…perhaps in fact not “beyond the dreams of avarice” (let’s not set the bar too low!) but probably worth a couple of million anyway, including the detached house in a pleasant neighbourhood etc.
“It was not painful; didn’t hurt…” Obviously not sufficiently deterred…
What gives the idiots the right to stop other people moving freely? Some weird idea that their actions will force Government to make more house insulation mandatory, or to pay for that? The protesters’ whole premise is nonsense. There is obviously a hidden agenda here, but protesters such as that retired doctor are merely pawns in someone else’s game.
Too many people are waking up. Bring on the talking heads and scribblers such as Susie Boniface, Fleet Street Fox, to call for the imprisonment of dissidents.
Note the police robots standing behind the “protester” (para-terrorist), not stopping him, not arresting him, nor even talking to him; in fact, looking “as if” they are protecting him…
In fact, the police car in that picture is also blocking the road.
Come to think of it, I have seen nothing from Susie Boniface, “Fleet Street Fox”, about treating “Insulate Britain” or Extinction Rebellion as “terrorists”. She may perhaps have done so (I tend to avoid reading her ignorant drivel), but I have anyway not seen it.
I remember watching this, as a boy of 14-15, in black and white (it was made in colour but I had my own huge and ancient b&w TV, with wooden case, and made, I should think, in the 1950s).
Looking at what little is on YouTube, and what (also not much) I can now recall, it is interesting to see the differences between the 1971 view of the near future (The Guardians was set in the 1980s) and what actually happened in the 1980s and on to 2021, 50 years after the 13 episodes of the series were shown.
There may have been those, in the early 1980s, amid the Miners’ Strike etc, who found parallels (the early paramilitarization of some police, and the use of SAS soldiers dressed as police).
Looking back now, one still finds parallels, but also great differences. The first is the relative quiescence of the public now. No, or very few, violent demonstrations, few big marches (and even fewer violent ones) compared to the 1970s.
Now, we have the Internet, and all its issues. That was not a factor, for the public, until the mid-1990s at earliest. The authorities have far wider powers in practice now, and use them.
In 1971, the “Guardian” force was seen as paramilitary, but in 2021 the forces of repression use plainclothes operatives (mostly), and not decrees (as such) but “laws” nodded through by a rubberstamp Parliament— look at the Online Harms Bill being put through Parliament right now, and with no resistance at all from a useless “Opposition” led by a Jewish-lobby puppet.
Also, 1971 people would not have taken seriously the idea that a virus which (supposedly) kills about 1 in 1,000 of the population would enable the UK Government to impose wide-ranging curbs on the most basic civil liberties (eg freedom to travel —even by car— in 2020); or that the kind of people who were most likely to resist actively in 1971 would become, in 2021, virtue-signalling “we’re good citizens, we are” serfs.
Interesting short documentary about the Afrika Korps in Libya and French Equatorial Africa (now, Chad, in part) in the early 1940s
Both Australia and New Zealand have become dystopian, multikulti, biosecurity police states. In my view, that is what happens when, inter alia, the people are more interested in whether they win some sports contest or other than in whether their civil rights are being trashed, and their racial and cultural identity destroyed. The UK is not much different; likewise the USA.
Other tweets seen
If that were to happen now, and if the European economies started to fall apart, social nationalists in the UK would be entirely unprepared. Having said that, what will be will be. We must stand ready to take advantage of any large-scale political opportunity.
Give him a day treated exactly as he and his collaborators treat dogs in laboratories, and film it.
The cars for the wealthy of the 1930s were beautiful, which I say despite not being much interested in cars. A car like that is a work of art, beautiful. These days, cars all look somewhat alike, or anyway dull, even Aston-Martins, Rolls-Royces, Bentleys etc. Having said that, art itself is now often rather ugly, thinking of the lucrative trash pumped out by Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin.
Starmer is the complete Jewish-lobby and/or Israel-lobby puppet. He is married to a Jewish woman, a lawyer, and his children are being brought up as if fully-Jewish, complete with Jewish holidays etc. Starmer is completely suborned.
The idea that Labour is “more electable” now, because Starmer is leader and is surrounded by other Labour Friends of Israel puppets (eg Rachel Reeves), is ludicrous. Look at the opinion polls: Labour is around 30%, with the Conservative Party (even though “led” by a useless, part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer and liar) is exceeding 40% in popular estimation. Boris-idiot even beats Starmer as “better potential Prime Minister”!
As for the TV presenter, Madeley, I always think of him as “the shoplifter”, despite his unexpected acquittal by a jury of imbeciles (I presume) many years ago.
In the 1990s, I knew a woman well-connected in the retail security business; she told me that people who knew the facts of that case knew that Madeley was guilty, no question. Secondhand and anecdotal, true, but I have no reason to doubt what I heard. He was lucky to have been acquitted; “lucky in his jury“, in the oft-heard Bar expression…[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Madeley#Personal_life].
Useful tip, even for non-carnivorous persons (like me).
There is a strong suspicion that a Jewish strain entered [what is now known as] the “Windsor” line in the 19thC, via Prince Albert.
Take a look at the readers’ comments (and voting) to that Daily Mail story: hundreds, and even thousands, of favourable votes for every unfavourable one.
The West is in social and cultural crisis, and it may only take the addition of an economic one for us to raise the banners of social national renaissance.
Russia also has its problems, of course.
…and soon, online criticism of those corrupt bastards will be censored, barred from social media by the Online Harms Bill presently going through Parliament, supported by what remains of the Labour Party…
For me, life under “Covid” or, more accurately, under the toytown police state imposed (using “the virus” as excuse and battering ram) in 2020 and 2021, though irritating, has been no more stressful than before, possibly because I have not been in Bar practice —or other daily activity requiring one to be on the qui vive— for over a decade now.
I laughed to see that the pathetic rump of the New Statesman thinks that “normality” is returning. I suppose they mean cretinous persons are again allowed to cram into loud unpleasant “clubs” etc.
Vaccine passports, the (continuing though ebbing) facemask nonsense, the pointlessness of travel under the plethora of (UK and other) “rules” and laws, the ever-worsening migration-invasion, supermarkets with gaps on the shelves, a “British” Cabinet where almost all the Cabinet ministers are Jews, Indians, Pakistanis, Kurds etc. This is “normal”?
All that, and still newer restrictions and repressions are planned, not least the “Online Harms Bill”, which may be law (for what that is worth) by early 2022. Then, goodbye to any but the most colourless “free speech” online.
2022, the first year of the next 33-year cycle. Most significant year since 1989.
The Great Reset, allied to the Great Replacement of whites by blacks, browns, Chinese etc, then eventually the mixed-race population promoted by Coudenhove-Kalergi.
Patriotic Alternative broadcast
I was just listening to the above, and still am (as I write). Worth a listen, though I cannot say that I am getting a lot from it. At least Mark Collett is doing whatever he can, while he can.
Guest on that show is one Thomas Balogh, leading light of the National Justice Party of the USA.
Of course, these days people cannot say much even on Internet “radio”, without being harassed, or even arrested and prosecuted: Alison Chabloz, the persecuted singer-songwriter and satirist, was actually imprisoned because (partly because) she took part in a discussion on a podcast of that sort.
I do not usually bother to listen to such discussions, but happen to be listening to that one, so have posted the link so that others can decide what they think of it.
[Re. that podcast by Collett: I listened, in the end, to about 45 mins out of the 2 hours].
Stray “thought out of season”
The ZOG/NWO System in the UK is shutting down (in fact, has already largely shut down or very heavily restricted) the channels of legitimate and peaceful socio-political expression. Where does that leave the people of Britain?
She looks Jewish. Quelle surprise. No idea who it is, though.
Idiots. Just idiots. Sitting in their million-pound houses in Somerset, insulated from reality by family money and/or private pensions, and quite likely private healthcare as well. In lay terms, also traitors, supporting the flood of migrant-invaders into this country. Pity there does not exist an SA to teach them the error of their ways.
What strikes me as crazed is that, firstly, students “reported” (denounced) a fellow-student for stating a simple fact, and, secondly, that the university then sided with the denouncers! Like a Komsomol witchhunt in the old Soviet Union…
The part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer currently posing as Prime Minister is planning to repress freedom of expression even further in the UK. He is supported in that by Jewish-lobby puppet Keir Starmer and his declining “Labour” pack of idiots.
Starmer: “Dangerous algorithms on Facebook and Instagram, and Hope Not Hate have shown me an example of violent Islamism and far-right propaganda on TikTok.’
He called on the Prime Minister to ‘commit to bring forward the second reading of the Online Safety Bill by the end of this calendar year’, adding: ‘If he does, we’ll support it.’” [Daily Mail].
The bastard is taking his “facts” from the malicious and misnamed Jew-Zionist snooping organization “Hope not Hate”!
Here we see the complete fakery of so-called “democracy” in the UK: repression of free speech rolled out swiftly, with the so-called “Opposition” mostly voting with the Government (of clowns). “Democracy” in the UK is a complete sham.
“Zionist Occupation Government” is not just a phrase or a “conspiracy theory”. It’s fact. It’s right in front of us.
Glasgow is not the only area badly-administered. I have just had a ghastly and (in the end) 2-hour roundtrip, unavoidable and made awkward and irritating by several simultaneous lots of roadworks (I suppose at least some of the roads are being repaired), both in the country and in a small town.
How is it that (especially in respect of smaller roads), repairs have evidently not been carried out for years? I saw tiny lanes never seen by me before , many with terrible surfacing, road bumps and potholes. Even at (at times) 20 mph, a journey of bumps and jolts.
To make it worse, I turned on BBC Radio 4, which had a programme of such surpassing awfulness that I looked it up when I arrived back at my very humble abode: Laura Barton’s Notes on Music. The only reason I did not snap it off was because I wanted to know when it was midday (I sold my watches long ago, and the clock in my old car no longer works).
Does anyone not trapped in a traffic jam (or similar chaos) actually listen to Radio 4 any more?
There were compensations today, though. At one point, a stag, not large but with impressive antlers, crossed the road not far ahead of me. Fallow deer.
Still, despite that pleasant reminder of the animal kingdom, I had time to wonder why nothing seems to work in England any more, and why everyday life seems to have become unnecessarily complicated.
A sneak has reported the radio presenter James Naughtie to the police for drink-driving. Read the above report.
The facts were that said sneak observed Naughtie downing a glass of Chardonnay, and even went into the pub garden to watch him, before reporting the matter to the police (and taking a picture of Naughtie’s car).
Naughtie was then confronted at his home (or one of them), and blew a mark of 35, which would be borderline in England, where the limit is 35 (and would have been below the legal limit by the time a court-admissible sample was taken at a police station), but is well above the legal limit in Scotland, where that limit is 22.
Now I would not complain about this had Naughtie (or anyone in that situation) been plainly legless, but the man had only had one or two glasses of wine!
Time was when (in both England and Scotland, I think) the sneak was despised rather than admired. That was then. Now there are a whole host of petty sneaks and denouncers all too ready to, as the Australians now apparently say, “dob someone in”.
You see it all the time on Twitter and other social media platforms, the denouncers (often, though not always, Jewish), whose whole life seems to revolve around “reporting” people to (say) Twitter, or to employers, or to professional organizations, or even to the police. Pathetic.
Incidentally, I do not make the above points because I am a drink-driver. I can probably count on one hand the number of times (over about 25 years) when I have driven —probably— over the local limit; at least three of those times would have been in the Caribbean, maybe once or twice in the UK. In fact, I rarely drink (even one glass) and drive now, so I am not pleading in my own interest at all; I just despise the “informer” type.
Final point: I never liked Naughtie’s radio persona or views much, so I have not written the above because I favour Naughtie himself.
Yet the mask zealots rule supreme on Twitter (though not in the real world). Many are are still pushing for renewed facemask nonsense, the plainly not very effective vaccinations, strict social distancing etc etc. It makes me wonder, not for the first time, whether there is not a psychological basis for their zealotry and unwillingness to move on. Many are also the hardcore “rejoin EU” types, such as those “FBPE” idiots you see on Twitter.
Off the Cluff
Memoirs of oil and publishing (etc) tycoon, Algy Cluff. The book looks interesting, but seems to be unavailable on Amazon, despite having an entry on that site. Is that because the Foreword is written by Taki, who is a bete noire of both the “woke” and the Jews? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taki_Theodoracopulos. Maybe, though, it is because there has been too heavy a demand; the book is not on retail sale until next week.
While Tang’s businesses are or were not the sort of places I usually frequent (I do not really like to shop anyway), I have in fact been to what was his flagship Hong Kong store, Shanghai Tang, in 2006.
I was in Hong Kong, getting some suits, jackets, shirts etc made at the famous Sam’s Tailor [https://www.samstailor.com/— I recall talking, about racing, mainly, to the present owner, whose photos are on the website, and who is the son of the one who was the owner in 2006].
Among the many items (all custom-made/bespoke) I bought was a very nice Chinese dark blue silk dressing gown with Chinese symbols on it. I asked if I could have made a similar but rather smaller one in another colour for my wife, as a present. They demurred because they would be unable to measure her (I was in HK alone). They were quite firm about it, even after I pressed them, so I asked where I might get one for her. They said Shanghai Tang. I went there.
Well, I did find a suitable but ready-to-wear dressing gown for my wife, and it was actually far better quality than my (still good) one from Sam’s Tailor. It was also far more expensive— about 15x the cost, in fact. That’s life…
I hope that I shall be able to read Cluff’s book; it sounds like it might be an interesting read. Apparently, Tang once tipped a waiter at a casino USD $90,000! Talk about playing the big shot!
Late film travelogue
A 1930s Agfa-colour film showing Berlin at the time of the 1936 Olympics, suggested by one of the regular readers of this blog:
Only three years into the currency of the NSDAP government! Imagine that! Boris-idiot has been (posing as) Prime Minister of the UK for nearly as long, and the Conservative party has been in office in the UK for some 11.5 years…
Another similar film?
In this case, not colour film, but more recently colourized.
More? In the following case, not moving pictures but some still colour and b&w photographs.
Pity about the repetitive soundtrack of that one, though.
Late tweets seen
It is absurd that we now have GPs who work 2-3 days per week in some cases, and yet are paid over £100,000, particularly when many see few patients face to face.
Published in the interest of open debate, without (necessarily) being endorsed by me. In any case, I am no medic.
Goodbye, decent British policing, hello maladministration, corruption and many other evils.
The quotation has occurred to me a few times since I started writing this blog in late 2016. Yesterday, WordPress sent, not for the first time, an automated message saying “Your stats are booming! Ian Robert Millard is getting lots of traffic“, which was pleasing, but (as on previous occasions) I think it better to proceed as if the blog had but one reader each day, rather than (often) hundreds of individual readers over the course of any 24 hours.
Having said that, it is good to see the increase in readership since I started the blog in November 2016. The first two full years of the blog (calendar years 2017 and 2018) showed a readership about the same in both years, though marginally higher in 2017 compared to 2018. However, there was a 500% increase in 2019, then a further nearly 400% increase in traffic in 2020. At present, it looks as if traffic for 2021 will be at a similar level to that of 2020, in other words, nearly 7x that of 2017.
Reverting to the headline quotation, I should prefer my blog to influence only one reader who then goes out to change the world, than a thousand — or a million— for whom the blog is merely something to read for 5 minutes, and leading to no action.
On the whole, that blog post, shorter than those I now put out, has aged well, though I was too optimistic in hoping that a nascent social-national movement would arise before 2020. In fact, there is still, in 2021, no obvious sign of one (I mean, of course, a credible one). The System’s fake “nationalist” parties headed by, mainly, Nigel Farage, i.e. UKIP and then Brexit Party, and now “Reform Party”, have prevented the birth of a proper social-national party.
We look now to the future. There is still all to play for.
If only the Second World War (involving the UK) had never started, or had ended (in the West) after Dunkirk (1940), or had ended later in the war, with an honourable armistice between the British Empire and the German Reich. Palestine would then never have fallen to the Jews (and the same or similar could be said of the UK).
In Palestine, there were Jews already living there in the 1930s, almost all of which Jews had arrived in the 20th century. Under British rule (the post-WW1 League of Nations Mandate), the Jews could not exercise supremacy over the Arabs, so they started to conspire against their British rulers, a process that continued even during WW2, and led (after the migration invasion of hundreds of thousands, then millions, of Jews into Palestine), to the establishment of the present State of Israel in 1948. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Israel#Illegal_Jewish_immigration_and_insurgency.
More tweets seen
“school kids“? Those untermenschen may be registered at some school or other, but basically are just what the South Africans used to call “skollies“, meaning bad n*****s…
Why are the people of the UK wasting taxpayers’ money trying to “educate” such untermenschen?
In the UK, there are elements that hate the British people, our race, our culture, our history— and they want to kill off all of us, one way or the other. The System is now on their side, looking at TV, film, books, and ads; and (((certain types))) support what amounts to “white genocide” against white Northern Europeans by non-whites, including (((those others))).
As to the specific criminals shown in the clip, we all know that, even if identified, they will face no, or no real, sanction. I could suggest a better idea, but in our “free” country (that MPs have been spouting about for several days now), I am not allowed to express it, let alone carry it out.
Ecce the part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer now posing as the “Prime Minister” of this country…
and said alleged-wig-wearing “science popularizer” is all in favour of mass immigration to Europe, a fact that is more likely to wipe out decent European civilization than anything else at present…
In any case, Professor Cox is, in my view, wrong when he ascribes “meaning” only to human entities. It’s a theological point which Cox (an atheist) would simply dismiss as obscurantist, no doubt.
In the “Covid” “debate”, as in the “debate” about migration-invasion, those in favour of the “panicdemic” measures (the facemask nonsense, “vaccination” using untried vaccines and potions, “social distancing” etc), just as with those in favour of mass immigration, end up having to eat their own tail, like Chronos (or, if you like, have to go up their own ****), in the end.
…and the rest…
Lack of understanding? Labour and the British people
The Jewish scribbler, Nick Cohen, tries to understand why the voters prefer “an obvious phoney” like “Boris” to anything Labour can come up with. He points to the latest opinion poll on Westminster voting intention (Con 41%, Lab 31%, LibDem 9%, Green 8%, Reform UK 4%.
You can forget “Reform UK”, the latest Farage/Tice vehicle. Controlled opposition in the UKIP/Brexit Party mould.
As for Greens, they are largely for disaffected otherwise Labour voters.
The LibDems reprise their longstanding role as “third choice”/dustbin for protest votes not radical enough to go Green or somewhere else.
Nick Cohen ends, lamely, by writing “All of this pushes all of us in the anti-Johnsonian counter-culture back to asking the same, old question: how can this country be so stupid?“
In fact, the answer is simple. “Boris”, the part-Jew chancer, and his misnamed “Conservatives”, are not very popular. Their vote in 2019 was only marginally up on 2017. The absurd UK electoral system simply came up with three cherries, and an 80-seat majority.
What has happened, as I have blogged repeatedly for years, is not that the Conservatives are popular, but that Labour is unpopular. Its 8-point slide from 2017 to 2019 made the point, surely?
Labour was a party of the “working man”. Now, well look at their recent conference! A little monkey aged (?) 17 and three quarters, dressed in the kind of dungaree favoured by some feminist mothers, bleated about climate change…
Basically, Labour’s house, once built on granite foundations (the organized, unionized, British working classes) now rests on the shifting sands of a “precariat”, which precariat is a multi-ethnic, multikulti, almost cultureless mass of “gig workers”, unemployed or “furloughed” people, either not unionized or belonging to unions which have promotion of “anti-racism”, “anti-sexism” and LGBTXYZ as their main interests.
In other words, the British people have been squeezed out of Labour. Labour is now, as I have said for years, the party of the ethnic minorities and some public service people.
When British people look at Jewish-lobby puppet Keir Starmer, and his thick and unpleasant deputy Angela Rayner, down on their knees to the “Black Lives Matter” nonsense, and wearing facemasks to boot, does it make British people want to vote Labour? I think not.
When British people look at the frighteningly uncultured, dim, MPs of Labour, particularly the black women such as Diane Abbott, Fiona Onasanya (now removed), Claudia Webbe (about to be removed), Dawn Butler etc, does it make them want to vote Labour? I think not.
So in the end, what remains of “Labour” offers almost the same as “Boris”-Conservatism: migration-invasion, poor pay, benefits, and pensions, the multikulti society writ larger even than under “Boris”, and…nothing much else.
Now that Israel-tool Starmer is leader, there is not even the idea that a vote for Labour might be a vote against Jewish Zionism.
The result is that Labour is a vote for almost no change, except even worse immigration invasion, and even stricter rules for both the workers and the (various types of) non-worker.
When American society finally collapses (and I think that that day will be much much sooner than 99.99% of other people think…), it will not be because of Jews, or blacks, or browns, or LGBTXYZ people, or finance-capitalist exploitation, or “woke” pseudo-socialism. It will be because of a cocktail of all of that.
Some people might think, “if I had a Luger, I might reach for it, if it would save the UK from going the way of the USA.” Sadly, a Luger (or a Browning, or a Sig-Sauer, or a Glock) will not help in this situation…you cannot fight a culture war with, primarily, weapons designed for an old-style or other real (shooting) war. More subtle —and yet wider— methods are required.
More about the Jewish-Zionist recapture of the Labour Party
I never thought much of Jeremy Corbyn, that unoriginal, poorly-educated, not particularly intelligent survival of 1970s London “socialist” meets “identity” politics. Corbyn, with his ludicrous “Cable Street”, “!Non Pasaran”, 1930s Popular Front-ism, his adulation of Fidel and Che (and, latterly, Chavez/Maduro).
Having said that, Corbyn, whose actual election as Labour leader was nothing short of miraculous, was recognizably British and, as I said in my blog, a type reminiscent of Labour people one met from time to time in the 1970s: the “Lenin” cap, the folded copy of, as it might be, Morning Star, Tribune, or Militant. The sort of fellow likely to be encountered at Collet’s London Bookshop in Charing Cross Road (a haunt of 1970s politicos of various sorts, and run by a little Jew).
Such people as Corbyn might also, I think, be encountered (though not by me) at local Labour or trade union meetings, steam fairs, heritage railways, the Durham Miners’ Gala, or the Tolpuddle Martyrs weekend.
I disagreed with much of Corbyn’s ideology, and with most of his (outdated and sometimes anti-British) policies. Having said that, he was decently anti-Zionist, though sadly gave lip-service to Zionist underpinnings such as the “holocaust” farrago and “anti-racism”, thus playing into the hands of the Jewish Zionist lobby, which itself is as “racist” as it gets, at root.
Zionism after all is basically a Jewish version of the Germanic “Blut und Boden” plus settler-colonialism (not that I oppose that…if done by real Europeans, though).
From the moment the Corbyn became Labour leader, there was a conspiracy launched against him. This was basically a Jewish/Zionist conspiracy, though making use of non-Jews (Chuka Umunna, Joan Ryan, Mary Creagh etc) and even the odd apostate Jew MP.
That conspiracy was funded by extremely wealthy Jew businessmen, and was able to rent quietly-situated houses in the country where secret meetings took place, and to utilize slush funds sourced directly from Israel.
Many will recall a (very) few TV programmes (very rarely seen in the msm) about the sheer scope of the Israeli/Jewish/Zionist lobby in the UK:
Sometimes that “lobby”, acting partly via Labour Friends of Israel and Conservative Friends of Israel, directs its attention to UK Middle East policy; sometimes, however, the interference is even more blatant, and extends to getting rid of MPs not willing to toe the Israel/Jewish lobby line.
Here below, for example, we see corrupt freeloader and expenses cheat, former “Labour” MP Joan Ryan, discussing a one million pound Israeli slush fund with one Shai Masot, an Israeli political intelligence officer (and reserve naval commander):
…and below, we see Israeli agent (of some kind) Maria Strizzolo (Italian name but, well, who knows?), and who, despite being a civil servant, talks about helping the Israelis to “take down” some British MPs:
I like the bit about the Israeli view of “Boris”, i.e. “...he is good, solid on Israel…you know he is an idiot...”. Yes, in fact, I did know that…
More on the above:
“Boris”, in following days, shrugged off and laughed about the above, even about the accurate Israeli assessment of himself (“an idiot“). What else could that sleazy part-Jew puppet do?
Reverting to the Labour Party and Corbyn, the conspiracy continued for about 3 years. A few msm stories over recent years:
Of course, the msm stories never mentioned “Jews” or “Jewish” or “Israel”…it was all about how “moderates” wanted to oust “extremist” Corbyn, though the idea that Corbyn was “anti-Semitic” became a drumming tom-tom over time.
The first ploy was to hold a leadership election to remove Corbyn. That misfired when most ordinary Labour members voted Corbyn rather than for the little Welsh windbag who opposed him.
The 2017 General Election, though superficially poor for Labour, was no worse, in percentage terms, than had occurred under Miliband and Brown.
The (((lobby))) then increased pressure on Corbyn himself, trying to pressure him to resign. That too failed, because Corbyn’s strong suit is that he has the hide of a rhinoceros.
Then came the 2019 General Election, at which Labour crashed, and the msm crowed about how “Boris” had won by a “landslide“. In seats, true, an 80-seat majority. FPTP voting did its work.
In terms of percentages, though, the Conservative Party garnered 43.6% of the popular vote, only 1.2 points higher than the 42.4% of 2017.
Other factors existed, but one stands out— the daily drip-drip of msm and (less important) social media poison about “Corbyn the anti-Semite”, “Corbyn the friend of terrorists”, “Corbyn the extremist” etc. BBC, Sky, the newspapers….and guess “what sort of people” are often the political editors and scribblers? That’s right… Zionist Jews.
Just off the top of my head, I can think of several organizations of mainstream media where the political editor(s) are Jewish: Sky News, LBC, various newspapers. No doubt other TV stations, radio stations and social media platforms are the same.
All that crushed both Corbyn and Labour. Don’t take my word for it, take it from the horse’s mouth:
Now? Corbyn has been replaced by Keir Starmer, a dull fellow but, significantly, one married to a Jewish woman, and their children are being brought up as if fully Jewish.
Corbyn has been suspended from the Labour Party, and the new Keir Starmer Shadow Cabinet is packed with Labour Friends of Israel members.
The Zionist lobby likes to have both main System parties “under control”. Corbyn’s leadership meant that one escaped, for a while. Now the stray sheep has been herded back into the pen. Both System parties are controlled, certainly strongly influenced, by the (((same or similar))) cabals.
More? Look at the kind of evil creatures involved (a long series of tweets but worth seeing):
Ruth Smeeth, half-Jewish, partly-descended from London gangsters, was not only the head of communications at the Israel-lobby org BICOM [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britain_Israel_Communications_and_Research_Centre] but, before being pushed into a quite-safe Labour seat, was revealed by Wikileaks as having been effectively a spy for the US Embassy in London. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Smeeth (the bit about the US Embassy is not there). She is also tied up with the mainly Jewish “antifascist” org misnamed “Hope not Hate”. She lost her seat as MP to a Conservative candidate in 2019, but her main job was done…
Ironically, Ruth Smeeth, who favours clamping down on freedom of expression (if, inter alia, Jews or Israel are criticized), is now head of the NGO called “Index on Censorship”. Incredible.
The above EU/Brexit stuff is not, in itself, very relevant, not specifically.
That unpleasant-looking young Jew in the centre (name unknown to me) was the one sitting and smirking next to expenses cheat and Israel-puppet MP, Joan Ryan, when Israeli political intelligence operative Shai Masot explained that a million pounds had been approved for use as a slush fund at Westminster.
A late thought: when Starmer is en famille, and having one of those specifically Jewish evenings that they have on (I think) Fridays, or on Jewish religious holidays, does he wear one of those little skullcaps? As they say on Twitter (from which I have been barred since 2018), “genuine question”. I have no idea whether the headgear is de rigueur or not.
Late afternoon music
The tweets below made me laugh:
Ha ha! At the English Bar, it has always been said that, in the examination or cross-examination of a witness, never ask a question to which you do not know the answer.
The first tweeter, a scribbler who describes herself as “zionist“, and who has (supposedly) nearly 40,000 Twitter “followers”, asks the question. She gets just over a thousand retweets from her “followers” (and/or stray Twitter readers).
That may or may not mean that 39,000 of her “followers” either disagree with her, or cannot be bothered to retweet, or that they think that she should have given an alternative option such as “like” for “No”, or even “history can be and should be examined and revised, because an asserted “fact”, or asserted “facts”, are not a religious article of faith but a matter for consideration of all or any evidence.”
Still, there are 65 million inhabitants in the UK, and only about a thousand agreed with the proposition. 1 out of every 65,000. Or to put it another way, only 1 out of every 40 of her own supposed Twitter “followers”.
As to the second tweeter, he/she does not seem to have considered that 39,000 out of 40,000 “followers” disagree, that even some Jews think that history is a moveable feast, revision necessary and even inevitable, and that people have the right to question such doubtful propaganda as comprise the “holocaust” farrago.
Ah. I see now that the first tweeter is in the USA, so the proportion either not agreeing with her, and/or not interested in her silly tweet, is many times even the above figures.
Good to see.
Parting shot: the Jewish woman who seems to want to restrict free speech on the fakeries and fraud around the Jew-Zionist “holocaust” farrago also claims to be in favour of freedom of expression! See below:
“Their” lack of self-awareness is always hard to believe.
That is correct in its sarcasm; Priti Patel is an idiot. Having said that, I am not against removing Internet anonymity. In fact, I am planning to discover the true details of a few of the worst trolls. Then we’ll see…
More from the new dystopian, multikulti, biosecurity police state in Australia.
So are the police now still “woodentops”, or just blockheads?
The present state of play re. the main System parties
What does it take to displace the part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer presently posing as Prime Minister? What does it take to depose the present “Conservative” government? Mass riots in the streets? Plagues of locusts? The waters of the Thames at Westminster turning blood-red?
So here we have Britain, and more particularly England, not only with recent petrol shortages (though I think that that particular storm has now broken and abated), but also with shortages of foodstuffs in the supermarkets, the NHS operating on a kind of skeleton basis, migration-invasion in the Channel continuing unchecked, and inflation (one of the entirely-foreseeable consequences of the 2020-21 Treasury Covid cash “giveaway”) rapidly increasing.
Even that is not a complete list. The HS2 vanity rail project continuing, with huge environmental loss, unemployment likely to increase before long despite recent optimistic figures, housing becoming even more of an issue, and no serious attempt to reform social care for the aged and infirm. A general slow slide in standards across the board.
All that (and more— think cronyism and corruption), yet Labour under Keir Starmer makes very little headway. Why?
In fact there have been a few opinion polls, over the past 6 months, placing Labour alongside or even ahead of the Conservatives, but not many. In any event, the leader of a party is arguably the most important factor in any general election in the UK.
Starmer’s strong suits? “Cares about people“; “in touch [with the masses]”. I seem to remember that Jeremy Corbyn scored even better on those aspects, not long before Labour crashed at the 2019 General Election.
Exactly. That last tweeter has hit the nail on the head. There has to be a coherent plan to solve the problems of the UK. Not an over-detailed “fully costed” accountant’s plan, but a general yet clear way forward. This is where Labour is failing.
As said previously by both me and others, Starmer’s appeal goes something like “we support the government’s reintroduction of 19thC workhouses, but they must be run more efficiently, fairer, while both wearing a facemask and bending the knee to the blacks.”
There is nothing much in Starmer-Labour to appeal to voters. What is offered is pretty much the same as offered by the Conservative Party: the same (or stricter) “virus” nonsense, the same (or stricter) real-terms cuts to State benefits and pensions, the same (or worse) mass non-white immigration.
In fact, Starmer-Labour’s only real points are “we would be more efficient than the Conservatives” (maybe, maybe not) and —Labour’s best point— “we are not the Conservative Party“. Labour hopes that, in a binary political system, enough people will want “Boris” out for them to vote Labour. Doubtful.
As a strategy, the above is pretty pathetic, but it is all that they have.
Tweets about the party-political state of play
Maybe so, but the Conservative Party is very entrenched in England, especially in most of the south of England. A diminution of support from voters would have to be large to have any effect at all on the overall state of play.
Incredible, looking at the mess the “Boris” NWO/ZOG regime is producing, but perception is all. For many voters, Labour still looks hopeless on the economy, even if it is no worse than the present pack of idiots.
Of course, Labour is now again under the thumb of the Jewish lobby (Starmer himself has a Jewish wife, and their children are being brought up as if fully-Jewish), but that fact alone does not make Labour any more pro-Jewish lobby or pro-Israel than the completely-suborned Conservative Party, 80% of the MPs of which belong to Conservative Friends of Israel.
In any case, for most voters, all that is “caviar to the general”, meaning over their heads. No significant political resonance.
I wonder whether there will be a “mass disobedience” event, as thousands start setting off fireworks in Trafalgar Square and Whitehall. That would have its “health and safety” risks, but would also be exciting.
As I have repeatedly blogged and (before the Jews removed my Twitter account in 2018) tweeted, what is happening is the preparation of NWO/ZOG for the next 33-year cycle, from 2022 to 2055. It is now in preparation.
Remember 1989, the last such key year? The older readers of my blog will. Socialism collapsed openly (having been collapsing for years) that year. The Berlin Wall came down. The socialist states of Europe became effectively finance-capitalist. Even the Soviet Union itself, though it limped on in name for another two years.
This seemed to be relatively quick, but had been in preparation for years. When Gorbachev came to the UK in, I think, 1984, and “Madame Hatchet” (Margaret Thatcher) proclaimed him as someone “with whom the West could do business”, that was a statement of literal truth.
In China, after 1989, socialism also collapsed, though some outward forms were kept up (the same was true of Cuba, Vietnam etc).
Now the international conspiracy-consensus is moving to its next 33-year agenda. By 2055, the world around us will be at least as different from today as 2021 is from 1988.
We have every right to do whatever we like, or have to, in order to reclaim our birthright.
Note that, on YouTube, the above audio post has had over 6,000 positive votes since May of this year, with only 112 negative votes…
Little Matt Hancock got his reward from the transnational conspiracy, it seems.
I am tempted to say “the whoosh and rattle as the guillotine claims another victim“!…but I suppose “the sound of the wind in the walnut trees” is more poetic…
A sad story, but also not sad. I hope that some time, in some way, they will all meet again.
The “global warming”/”climate change” narrative goes back even further, to at least 1977, when a very alarmist documentary was screened in the UK. I myself missed it, because I was in Rhodesia at the time. Still, I also missed the ridiculous Queen’s Silver Jubilee nonsense, so cannot complain…(#Winning!). I read a paperbook book about the documentary and the ideas and political background behind it (the book was very taken with the “global warming” theory), about a year later.
My view has not changed over the past 20 years when the “climate change” narrative has become a large part of international policy. It is that forms of climate change have occurred (irrespective of human input) since the Earth existed in anything like its present form.
It is known, historically, that is to say in the past few thousand years, that the climate (eg in the UK) has warmed and cooled at times, well before industrialization and also before there was a vast population on the Earth.
That is not to say that climate change is not happening. In some areas of the world, it is noticeable even by the public (eg the fact that Eastern Australia is far hotter now than it was when I was there in the late 1960s).
It is unsurprising that young people, anyone under 20 or so certainly, are very taken with the narrative pumped out by those running the narrative, and controlling the likes of Greta Nut. The proven frauds by the IPCC from 10-15 years ago (Himalayan Glaciers disappearing by 2020, Indian rivers drying up, the Kilimanjaro snows etc etc) will have escaped most of those young people.
Causation of climate change is not really known; some seeming causes are doubtful; remedies, if any, more doubtful yet.
In fact, within bounds, and overall, global cooling would be far worse than global warming; the history of past centuries shows that.
The “climate change” narrative as a whole is being used (as is “the global pandemic” story) to force through socio-political changes on a vast scale, in preparation for the next 33-year cycle beginning in 2022.
There should be far fewer people on the Earth. That is true, and will probably be the case before very long. A population of about a quarter or even a tenth of the present would be good, especially if mainly European.
Best idea: not to have sub-Saharans in the UK or even part of Europe.
Don’t forget the part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer currently posing as Prime Minister.
Migration-invasion. The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan in action, flooding the UK with backward elements.
Interesting and, indeed, alarming, if true.
I remember some of those Jack Hargreaves TV programmes. Early 1970s. Don’t think that they were all children’s TV as such, though.
Despite Hargreaves reminiscing on TV about his modest childhood, he actually attended a fee-paying school; as for his “country old folk” persona on those TV shows, he was also a director of a small TV station and, earlier, editor of magazines, including the once-popular Picture Post. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Hargreaves.
A lucky escape
If those magistrates are interested, I think that I have a London bridge to sell them!
The fact is that, especially in the lower courts, there are sometimes perverse verdicts and/or decisions. I imagine that all barristers will be able to recall some from their own experience. I (wrongfully disbarred in 2016) certainly do recall a few.
However, I am not sure that the above verdict is actually perverse, when looked at more closely.
Disappointingly, the Daily Telegraph account is less informative than that of the Daily Mail. The Mail reports the key factor in the decision of the magistrates, i.e. that, given that the defendant did drink a considerable amount in the hour after the crash, the court was unwilling to infer that she was above the legal limit at the material time.
Frankly, while that verdict might not have been actually “perverse”, in my view it was still wrong. The court had plenty of credible evidence before it to support a “Guilty” verdict, in my view. The victim was “credible“, the defendant “misleading” and her Pakistani friend “incredible“, in the words of the magistrates. She had therefore been drinking while driving.
The details of the crash itself, together with the evidence of the victim, fully support an inference that, beyond any reasonable doubt, the defendant was over the legal limit while driving. A guilty verdict would have been better. She was lucky.
On the wider sociological point, one trembles for Britain when there are so many drunken sluts like her driving around. It goes beyond the simple road safety aspect. Even her friend and (possibly perjuring) witness, presumably a Muslim at least by origin, seems to have had a litre of vodka at hand! Britain. 2021.
I first posted the above clip about 6 months ago, and then wrote that, “Good grief! Someone sent me the clip below. I knew that Lammy was/is a deadhead, and in fact I have been meaning for a long time to add an assessment of him to my “Deadhead MPs” series, but…well, see for yourself!” and “People will say, “oh, but he is a barrister, has several degrees etc”…yes, and one of the most stupid (and ignorant) people I ever met was a former Sierra Leone diplomat, a High Commissioner to the UK when in London, and ambassador to some other state. That African had degrees from one of the most famous English universities, one from the Sorbonne, one from either Harvard or Yale (I forget).” Then I added, “Imagine Lammy as either Lord Chancellor or Attorney-General! Still, now that Keir Starmer is running what is left of Labour into the ground, such appointment is unlikely.”
The most obvious box-tick is the number of blacks and browns in leading roles: the captain of the nuclear submarine Vigil is a black, while the medical officer on board is an (?) Indian woman. Ashore, about half the Scottish (Glasgow) police detectives are non-white, and of the two main MI5 officers in the drama, one is seemingly Pakistani or something else.
Another box-tick is that, of the two women police detectives, the older one, a grieving quasi-widow, has a lesbian affair with the other. Well, such things happen, and there are, no doubt, both Glasgow detectives and naval officers (and MI5 personnel) who are non-white. In such proportion, though? In every TV drama?
A few other points about Vigil caught my attention. The GRU officer caught in Glasgow was interviewed about a murder (in which he was the only obvious suspect) without a lawyer present (despite having asked for one), and apparently without having been cautioned, and the interview was plainly not being taped (as far as I could see). At least three serious breaches of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, aka PACE. Not very good for a “police procedural” type of drama.
Again, the GRU [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRU] officer under diplomatic cover, caught in Glasgow in activities “incompatible with his diplomatic status”, did not, on being caught, immediately proclaim his diplomatic status (and so immunity); neither did he demand to be released at once, or to have contacted for him the Russian Consulate, as a real one would have done.
Not that such “demands” are always treated respectfully. When I myself was arrested (or as the Egyptian army and secret police said repeatedly, “not arrested”) in Alexandria in 1998, and held for about 11 hours by Egyptian Army intelligence/security and then the Mukhabarat (secret police), I asked repeatedly for the British Consul, only to be told (also repeatedly) that I was “not arrested”, but just “answering a few questions“, or “a fewmore questions“; also, that “the Consul will be very busy…“, and “the Consul is only for the most serious cases…you do not want to be treated as a serious case, do you?“…
Still, and despite the foregoing, Vigil is not bad, and I shall probably see that last episode today.
In a sense, execution is too quick for those and similar monsters. The best thing that can be done to prevent such crimes is to ensure that such creatures cannot be born in the first place.
Quite. A silly fellow making a pointless and silly (and ahistorical) protest, but why should he not be allowed to do so? The present Home Secretary is an ever-more ballooning Indian woman of surpassing stupidity, incompetence, and ignorance (as well as being, effectively, an agent of Israel). Put that on your placard, you idiot!
More idiots. These ones are so ineffective and ridiculous that they cannot even be said to be “controlled opposition”. Just 5-minutes-of-fame (15 would be too long) political bad jokes. The Monster Raving Loonies are at least amusing when they show up.
What horrible ugly alien monsters.
I do not know what is more disturbing, that half-Jew office bully Raab is spouting “woke” nonsense, or that someone who has attended both Oxford and Cambridge universities, and is —even if ludicrously— presently Lord Chancellor, does not know the meaning of the word “misogyny”. Another sign of the times?
I suppose that one could take issue with the first part of Griffin’s tweet: it was not the State ownership of the means of production that crippled socialist economies, but the fact that the State, the political sphere if you like, operated companies etc, in other words made all the important decisions. Admittedly, in many such cases that will be the same as “ownership”.
It is noteworthy that Jews in the UK are among the most fervent supporters of Covid vaccination(s) and vaccines, the facemask nonsense, and all the repressive measures introduced by this crazed government of clowns since early 2020. I am not sure exactly why that should be, but it is a fact that I have noticed. Also, the pro-EU hard-core “Remainers” seem to be facemask zealots etc. Again, hard to see why, unless it is a wish to not have to think for themselves. Preparation of future karma?
Sometimes, I can see why people less polite than me want to kick in the heads of some members of the Parliamentary monkeyhouse… The sheer cheek of many MPs infuriates many members of the public and —in my view— rightly so.
Admittedly, £81,000 is not a fortune these days, especially when taxable etc, but bearing in mind that average UK pay is only about £31,000 (and the median far less even than that, and less again if those dependent on State benefits and pensions are included), I doubt that many will think MPs are hard done by. Even less so when one considers how many have other sources of income, such as second jobs, “consultancy” “work”, money from scribbling or being TV talking heads etc; not to mention the very many who have large monies via inheritances.
Many MPs are also buy-to-let parasites.
In the end, MPs are volunteers. If they think that they are worth more than £81K p.a., let them go and get it on the open market. Few can do so, which is why so many are found sinecures in state employment, or in quangosw (via cronyism) when they lose their seats.