Afternoon music
Tweets seen
Translates to a Commons with about 330 Reform UK MPs (small overall majority), 72 LibDems (weak official Opposition), 66 Lab, 56 Cons, 53 Greens, 44 SNP [etc].
Same story as in most recent polling: Reform in government, the rest straggling more or less together in its wake.
Perhaps so, but when oh when will Goodwin and all the other politicos, talking heads, and “mainstream” scribblers stand up for free speech on the subject of Judaism, Zionism and, in a word, Jews?
The Jewish/Israel lobby is the main one trying to close down free speech in this country,.
You read it here first (as usual)…
The Americans are, once again, doing the [Israeli] Jews’ work.
Fact is, there is a fifth column in the UK, USA etc, and it is a pro-Israel Jewish lobby fifth column. Not all Jews support it, or are part of it, but a great many, probably the majority of them, do support it and Israel. There are also non-Jews who (bribed, intimidated, or just stupid) who are part of it, or controlled, in effect, by it.
[“Hypersonic Fatah (“Victory”) Missile breaking through Iron Dome air defence missiles to land in Tel Aviv.“]
Hard to know whether the targeting is more or less random, or whether the Iranians are seeking out locations used by MOSSAD etc.
[“A Spanish journalist based in the Israel:
We can show where the missile hit, but only on the condition that we show civilian buildings.
If, for example, there is a “Mossad” headquarters or a government building behind a destroyed building, the “Israeli” military censorship department does not allow us to show these shots or make reports on them, so that Iran does not understand that an important target was hit or does not reveal their vulnerability.
The censorship department requires that all videos be sent to them for verification before publication, and if we do not comply with the rules, our operating license will be revoked.“]
More music
Talking point
An interesting historical conundrum. Many many people are, at long last, waking up to the fact that they have been sold an ahistorical package that simply does not add up in a number of ways (including literally).
As for Schindler’s List, that was a film based on the book Schindler’s Ark by one Thomas Keneally, an Australian born in 1935, who never even left Australia until the late 1960s, and never visited Poland until 1980 or 1981. Even Wikipedia (heavily “edited”, i.e. vandalized, by Jewish individuals and organizations on a number of topics) calls Schindler’s Ark “historical fiction“. It is no more a work of “history”, as such, than books such as Day of the Jackal.
The film, Schindler’s List, is even less accurate historically.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Keneally
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schindler%27s_Ark
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schindler%27s_List
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Jackal_(film)
Incidentally, I myself knew a German lady, now-deceased, and from an aristocratic East Prussian and Austrian background (on the paternal and maternal sides respectively) who, aged only 13, was kept in the Soviet Union as a kind of hostage from 1939 to 1942 (her father was shot), and who managed to escape in the end, arriving in Iran with the (Polish) Anders Army and its dependants, and in time travelling on to British East Africa.
That lady, much later (1950s), lived in London with her British husband (whom she had married in the 1940s in East Africa); her story, in outline, was presented to the once-famous American Jew film director Otto Preminger [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Preminger] by a third party, a writer.
Preminger met that lady, and her far older husband (who had served as a British officer in the First World War) at an expensive hotel in London in, I believe, 1960.
Preminger told the couple that he was seriously interested in making a film about the events described, but that there would have to be one significant change: instead of just escaping from the Soviet Union, she would also have to have been, prior to that, also escaping from German forces…
Needless to add, the couple refused to agree on that basis; the film was therefore never made.
That sort of experience has happened to several people with not-dissimilar stories, though most had not that lady’s extra “glamour” details such as her having met, as a child, luminaries such as Yusupov (who killed Rasputin), and Marshal Mannerheim of Finland (to whom she was in fact distantly related); in fact her family history on the paternal side could be traced back to a Grand Master of the Teutonic Knights and, on the maternal side, to Metternich.
People talk about “historical revision” and “revisionism”, but the real or first “revision” was done from the 1940s onwards by (mostly Jewish) film directors and writers. People are only now finding out that further historical revision is necessary in order to regain historical truth.
More music
Substack
Ian Robert Millard 