Interesting, if the new disclosures have any truth.
Blair was one of the most fervent members of Labour Friends of Israel when he was an MP. Corbyn, though weak, was relatively anti-Zionist. Starmer is another Labour “Friend of Israel”, and is married to a Jewish woman who is a lawyer; their children are being brought up as Jewish; Starmer and his wife celebrate Jewish tribal holidays.
The Jewish lobby wanted to regain control of the Labour Party. They have. Corbyn is now an “unperson”, but Starmer seems to be doing worse, as Labour leader, even than Corbyn (a result which I predicted in these blog pages).
I have seen and heard nothing as to whether Alison Chabloz’s trial Counsel (who, on her behalf, will be appealing her conviction and sentence), has as yet lodged that appeal and/or applied for bail pending that appeal. I apprehend that such application(s) will be lodged and made as soon as possible, possibly today.
[Update, 7 April 2021: It now appears that Alison Chabloz’s prisoner number is in fact slightly different from that quoted in the above tweet, and is A6478EK]
The extirpation of social and social media freedom
We are seeing a rather swift extirpation of freedom in the socio-political realm in the UK. Take social media in the past 10-15 years. At first, people could say pretty much whatever they wanted to say. As in “real life”, there were exceptions, such as direct threats from one individual to assault or kill another.
Slowly, that freedom has been diminished. To a large extent, those driving that unfreedom have been Zionist Jews. They have been running campaigns for years to censor those hostile to Israel or to the Jewish lobby generally. They have tried to have material taken down, individuals arrested or harassed by compliant police (in parts of London, often also Jewish), and individuals’ Twitter or other social platform “accounts” removed.
In addition, those Jewish-Zionist cabals have been busily engaged in lobbying the social media giants to take swift “enforcement action” against “offending” material. That would include almost anything about Jews that (some) Jews find (or pretend to find) “offensive”, anything anti-Israel, anything questioning the “holocaust” narrative (even the obviously untrue “gas chambers” aspect).
Even dissenting tweets re. the “climate change” narrative, or “Covid-19” etc, or the efficacy of the vaccine(s) are now banned, or often banned.
This is “privatization of public space”. The economic enterprise, such as Twitter, simply decides to “unperson” someone. The “account” is removed or (in the weasel word) “suspended”. No appeal worth anything. No recourse. Unless, like Jeffrey Bowers, you can get some Jew scribbler to put in a private word for you…(see below)
Taking just Twitter as exemplar, almost anyone not Jewish can now be removed at the whim of the Jewish lobby.
Some of the others expelled include the persecuted satirical singer Alison Chabloz (currently facing trial), David Icke, Mark Collett, Laura Towler, and thousands of other individuals and organizations.
I recall seeing a report many years ago, around 2014, in an online Israeli newspaper, about how the Israeli ambassador in London met with a prominent Jew solicitor and other ghastly creatures, and planned how to use “lawfare” (abuse of English and Scottish law and justice) to persecute “antisemitic” British people. I have a pretty good idea of some of the identities of those who attended that conspiratorial meeting.
The original tweet (below):
Note that Professor Bowers, removed from Twitter because a pack of Zionist Jews demanded his removal, was only “allowed” back onto the platform because, as he says, “I appreciate a reporter from JewishNews who used his contact to twitter to question it.“
In other words, a word from a strategically-placed or favoured Jew, and Twitter (another Jew, or Jews, working for Twitter?) suddenly decided to “reinstate” Professor Bowers.
In reality, Twitter censored Professor Bowers to the extent of “suspending” him (i.e. expelling him, in effect) simply because Zionist Jews objected to his support for Professor Miller and free speech; they then reinstated him for the same reason, because (other) Jews asked that he be reinstated.
The Jewish influence on Twitter is now more than obvious; it is blatant.
It is clear to me that there has been a deliberate infiltration of Zionist Jews into the strategic areas controlling the social media field. In the msm, it happened long ago, and in a less planned way. I cannot immediately locate my statistics on the proportion of Jews working as journalists and editors in major UK newspapers, for the BBC, Channel 4, Sky News etc, but it is high. In some cases over 50%; yet Jews are only 0.5% (if that) of the UK population. A disproportion of 100 times…
Were I to be “caught” by the police doing anything (admittedly unlikely), anything at all, and given a ticket or whatever, I should never have to pay. Not even would not be willing to pay, but simply would never be required to…
Gott mit uns…
The real aim of the System being to turn out teenagers that will be even more compliant and pathetic. The present crop are (from, admittedly, the relative few that I have seen or encountered in recent years) almost a total waste of space. God knows what those of 2025 or 2030 will be like.
Do you really believe that peaceful tweeting, blogging, or writing letters to MPs will cleanse this country of emergent and evil tyranny?
Well, the definition of madness is sometimes said to be continually doing the same thing but expecting different results, and proving that today is “Dr” Louise Raw, whom Zionist Jews dislike even though she constantly supports their main propaganda (eg the “holocaust” fable”) and often says how wonderful Jews are…
Suspended and very nearly cast into outer darkness after Jew-Zionists decided to have Twitter “suspend” (expel) her, a campaign was launched to have her “account” reinstated. Still, I expect that she has been given a lesson by the Jews, and will be even more “antifascist” (effectively, pro-Jewish lobby) in future, now.
I should like to think that the experience of being “deplatformed” (something she loves when it happens to those she labels “fascist”, “Nazi” etc) would give her pause for thought. I doubt it, frankly. She does not strike me as a very original (or logical) thinker.
The tweet by “Dr” Raw, above, would seem to prove my point. Eulogizing some Jewish woman… (“when I say jump, you say, how high?“…)
…and look at the tweet below!
“Some right wing group“? Ha ha! Tweeter “Mary Ellen”/”@HullLecturer” obviously cannot bring herself to say “the J-word”! Also, like so many self-describing “Left” people, she cannot see that those who have supported “deplatforming” (i.e. destruction of free speech) will almost all fall victim to it themselves in the end.
I wonder what the Americans of, say, 1980, or 1960, let alone 1940 or 1920, would say about the state of the USA and its Federal Government today?
Something more pleasant (below):
As far as the USA is concerned (and while I have never had any time for Trump), the result of the recent election is not really legitimate from a social-national point of view because over half of the American population is now non-white; without the non-white vote, Biden’s almost entirely Jewish government would never have been elected.
That is what made the popular surge into the Capitol such a significant act, small and disorganized as it was. It said “we do not recognize your election!“
Once a sufficiently large number of white Americans realize that the existing US voting/electoral/political and social system is not working for them and has to be bypassed, we, the social-nationalists, are in business. Even if only 5% or 10% of Americans support something akin to social nationalism fully. The Boston Tea Party [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party] was a similar small protest, but it had big effects…
Today, grey skies, dry, with little wind. In the neighbourhood where I now live, no noise at all. A strange feeling of stasis. Am I extrapolating too far in extending that to the society as a whole? Maybe not. Calm before the storm?
The latest “lockdown” has shut down society, economy, and politics to an extent never before seen in the UK, as far as I know, together with the same in early/mid 2020. As far as System politics is concerned, there is a clownish but still quite sinister UK Government, its sinister nature not entirely mitigated by its incompetence.
The official Opposition does not really exist, and is simply supporting Government policy (unsurprising in view of the fact that both parties are ZOG/NWO-dominated and that there may be no General Election until 2024), and Parliament itself is only pretending to sit. The Chamber of the House of Commons now only has a token number of MPs present when officially sitting.
The System msm has only one story— “the virus”. Everything else is all but ignored.
Under the surface, though, there is movement. We hear that half a million small and medium-size businesses are going under now or soon. Fools (including highly-paid “expert” fools in the City of London and msm) think that almost all of that hurt can be mitigated by “Government help”. Really? For how long?
In the end, notwithstanding government borrowing, the government of a country only has such financial resources as are the product of its economy. The UK economy has been partly, in fact largely, shut down for much of the past year. Now again, and until a date uncertain in March, April, or even later.
So far, the various “furlough”, no-eviction, and rent holiday measures have softened the blow, but they will not continue indefinitely.
The UK is heading for a massive economic and political crisis. There must arise a social-national movement to lead the way out of all this nonsense.
Nicky Morgan is promoting an Online Harms Bill, whch will cut down even the limited free speech online that still exists. The American Jew mentioned wanted even more strict “regulation”. There was (quelle surprise) no-one speaking up for freedom of expression online, unless is included the presenter.
The presenter asked the killer question, as I remembered it: “what if Twitter or Facebook decide to take down Nicky Morgan’s account, and perhaps decide to retain Vladimir Putin’s? You have no right of appeal anywhere...” Nicky Morgan did not even address that question, which is the most important.
As I have been blogging, speaking and (ironically, before the Jew lobby had me expelled from Twitter in 2018) tweeting for years, the point is that there has been “privatization of public space”.
The huge transnational quasi-monopolies such as Twitter, Facebook, ebay, Amazon, provide the citizen with no rights qua citizen, only worthless contractual rights as “customer”. There is no right of appeal to being expelled, not even in-house (worth a dime), let alone any right of appeal to an outside body such as a tribunal or court.
I suppose that the organized Jewish lobby, and their dupes, think it wonderful that the “far-right” “extremists” (so-called) may soon (as with the present Twitter/Parler/GAB situation) have nowhere to go online. When you take away the possibility to protest and put forward views and ideas peacefully, you open the door to violence, as John F. Kennedy said.
I agree. In many ways, the old DDR (which I saw, briefly, just a couple of days, in 1988) was a real police state, and had been since Soviet occupation in 1945. On the other hand, the once-free UK is also getting that way: “laws” (and “advice”/”guidance” with almost the force of law), never really validated, or nodded swiftly through an elected dictatorship “Parliament”; mass media all singing the same tune in various ways; dissidents arrested if they dare to protest on the streets or even online; young scapegoats and teenaged sacrificial lambs (often with problems of autism etc) sent to prison for years on trumped-up “preparation of acts of terror” charges. Satirical singers prosecuted for irritating Jews.
Tweeter “@cashandcarrots” has obviously missed the recent “deplatforming” of so many people with “unapproved” views: in the UK, USA, Australia etc. Not just people complaining about the behaviour of Jews, or about the continuing black/brown migration-invasion, but people examining how “the virus” came about, and what is the real hidden agenda behind it and the vaccine campaign.
Hardy ha ha…
That tweet seems to be at odds with Lewis’s tweets to Alison Chabloz and others! See below:
Does it work with other types of skull?
Twitter has been fooling around with followings for years. When I was expelled in 2018, I had 3,000 followers. I suppose that, today, that would probably be about 6,000. In fact, many others told me that they had tried to follow but could not. There was shadowbanning etc. Meanwhile, there are those, such as “Mark Lewis Lawyer” (see above) and his one-time wife (they divorced after a year), washed-up local radio presenter Caroline Feraday, who bought tens of thousands of “followers” about 7-8 years ago.
Many Twitter accounts are Potemkin villages, with little behind them.
Twitter is basically a waste of time now, though I find it convenient to use the tweets of others in my blog.
That part-Jew clown is just posing as Prime Minister, as I have blogged since he took office.
Leaving aside the racial-cultural aspect, the prominent footballer, Rashford, is right to say that the feeding of poorer children is a complete disgrace.
Paula Hitler’s 1957 statement:
Never forget this: Your names will long be forgotten even before your bodies have rotted away in the earth. But the name Adolf Hitler will still be a light in the darkness. You cannot murder him by drowning his memory in your sick-buckets and you cannot strangle him with your filthy, ink-stained fingers. His name exists forever in hundreds of thousands of souls. You are far too insignificant to even touch him.
He loved Germany, he fretted over Germany. When he fought for honour and respect he fought for German Honour, for respect for Germany and when there was nothing left, he gave his life for Germany.
What have you given so far? Which one of you would give his life for Germany? The only things you care about are riches, power and never ending luxurious living. When you think of Germany, you think of indulging your senses without responsibility, without cares?
Trust me on this: The Fuhrer’s utter unselfishness in word and deed alone guarantees his immortality. The fact that the bitter fight for Germany’s greatness wasn’t crowned by success, like for example Cromwell’s in Britain, has a lot to do with the mentality of the people involved.
On the one hand the Englishman’s character is essentially unfair, ruled by jealousy, self-importance, and a lack of consideration. But he never forgets he is an Englishman, loyal to his people and to his crown. On the other hand, the German with his need for recognition is never first and foremost a German.
Therefore it doesn’t matter to you, you insignificant beings, if you destroy the entire nation. Your only guiding thought will always be, me first – me second – me third.
In your worthlessness you will never think of the welfare of the nation – and with that pitiful philosophy you wish to prevent the immortality of a giant?
What I wrote down immediately after the war has been proven to be correct. That my convictions are true is evident even as late as 1957.
Signed, Paula Hitler, Berchtesgaden, May, 1st. 1957“
Overnight, some straws in the wind. In Manchester, hundreds of students tore down 7-ft-high fencing put up to isolate their accommodation buildings. The security guards and police were unable to stop them.
My feeling at present is that the System (and so the Boris-idiot ZOG/NWO “government of clowns”) intends to keep the police-state restrictions of the “lockdown” (shutdown) going until next Spring or Summer. They will probably “allow” a relaxation over Christmas and New Year, and so be able, later, to claim that there has been another “upsurge” in “the virus” by reason of the “irresponsibility” of parts of the public…
The virus is almost incidental. The real purpose is to weaponize it so that greater social and political control can be imposed.
The malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” crows about its victory over a Jew who dislikes Zionist Jews. Only yesterday, the “CAA” failed to ruin pharmacist Nazim Ali (who was issued only with a “warning” by his disciplinary tribunal). I blogged yesterday about the Nizam Ali case.
I was amused to see that the “CAA” says that it was “advised” by Mark Lewis, the abusive solicitor who now lives in Eilat, Israel, and who now calls himself “Dr” Mark Lewis because his old poly gave him an honorary doctorate several years ago. I have blogged about the egregious Lewis in the past (use the search function on this blog to find those articles).
Quite right. Keir Starmer is a Jewish-lobby puppet and “virus” alarmist with no idea, about anything, worth anything.
Yes. That is where we are. Not the old socialist-style “police state”, but the new dystopian public-private partnership, politically-correct, virtue-signalling police state, heavily disguised with Common Purpose fake communitarianism.
Sargon of Akkad (Carl Benjamin)
The “alt-Right” or “alt-Lite” tweeter and vlogger, “Sargon of Akkad” (Carl Benjamin), has now been “suspended”, quite possibly permanently, from Twitter.
[update, same day: I may have been mistaken re. suspension of at least one “Sargon of Akkad” account. My main points stand, though]
Obviously, I have little time for those “alt-Right”/”alt-Lite” wastes of space (Sargon of Akkad, Prison Planet Watson, Katie Hopkins etc) but I have no wish to see them censored or gagged. The Jews and their “antifa” dupes are of a different view. They regard every free speech avenue closed as a victory.
It does reinforce my views that, firstly, System censorship and control is intensifying: the more interesting David Icke was removed from Twitter a day or two ago, and the Bitchute platform has suffered too, having been taken down.
Even Trump has been to some extent censored by Twitter!
If even the President of the United States cannot rely on having free speech, what chance for anyone else?
What really matters, though, is not online comment but concrete results, and boots on the ground.
Ethnic breakdown of voters in USA
Seems clear on the basis of the above (n.b. seems genuine but I have no source) that all of those groups except the (tied) top two (white and non-white college graduates, i.e degree-holders) and white non-college graduates, are far more likely to vote Democrat.
Non-whites now outnumber whites in the USA, and the disparity is growing. The 2016 and 2020 election were not simple white v. non-white contests, but it is clear that that binary was important in both elections and like to become more so.
Puting it bluntly, democracy of the one-man one-vote sort kills the future for white people if the population of voters is mixed, and the whites in the minority.
As someone who has not cycled for nearly 40 years (and that was in Amsterdam), I think that the “cycle lanes” all over the UK are totally stupid. The problem, though, is they usually just appropriate part of an existing road, whereas in places like the Netherlands and Denmark, new cycleways are created, where possible, separate from motorized traffic. It’s all planned.
The careful and intelligent analysis and thinking of such as former Lord of Appeal, Lord Sumption (and me!), is out of place now. The “plebs”, the hysterical pseudo-intelligentsia of the msm and Twitter, the non-whites (speaking generally), have no time for it, and no understanding, and no tolerance.
I have never had much time for Julia Hartley-Brewer, but she is absolutely right here: the nation (not alone; there are others around the world) has lost its mind. It has been made to lose its mind. There are sinister forces behind all this “virus” panic, forces that are using the situation as an experiment in mass psychological manipulation.
The better white people in the USA should be making plans to concentrate mainly in one, or a few, areas. They have lost the demographic battle. Not that Trump supporters are all white by any means, but the wider question has nothing to do with the egregious Trump. It is a question of the future of European-origined people in the near-future North America.
Late afternoon music
Now we hear that in Liverpool, in London, and across the UK, infections of Coronavirus are falling! This is being recorded now and has been in the past days. In other words, before the “lockdown” (shutdown) even started! What more does it take to wake up both people and Government?
I blogged to this effect, more or less, only last week…
I am basically opposed to nuclear power, but one cannot put one’s head in the sand. The UK is in danger of running short on power, partly because of the criminal increase in population by reason of mass immigration, then births to such immigrants and migrant-invaders.
At present, it would be possible, were there better relations with Russia, to import gas cheaply from Russian fields in the Arctic and Siberia. Looking ahead further, the UK should attempt energy security: solar, sub-earthly (deep heat) etc.
Just listening to a discussion among several “ordinary people” on BBC Radio 4 Today. Pathetic. All with different opinions, but what was pathetic was the fact that they were all arguing from completely a distorted or brainwashed basis.
All agreed that they were confused and unimpressed by Government messaging. On whether or not this or that measure should be carried out, though, there was disagreement, but all in fact had obviously been brainwashed into believing that “lockdown” meant “virus control”, and that no “lockdown” meant “virus increases”. Which is a false syllogism.
I was struck by someone who was supposedly a small or smallish businessman. His viewpoint was that there should be a total and immediate “lockdown” across the UK, and that the State should basically pay businesses not to trade, and their employees not to work. No thought at all for the economic unsustainability.
Not one interviewee said “as a matter of fact, lockdowns achieve little and may be counterproductive“; and none mentioned the facemask nonsense either way. The propaganda has cut deep.
Apparently, opinion polls (for what they are worth) show that a majority of British people want stricter “rules” and a continuing series of local or even national “lockdowns”. My conclusion from that is that the money doled out by Indian “clever boy” Rishi Sunak has anaesthetized the British public. The public now thinks that “lockdowns” etc are painless. What a shock they are going to get.
Meanwhile, it seems that even the scaremongering “experts” are now saying that “the virus” has largely run its course in the UK. They are saving face by saying also that the public must “keep following the rules”. Yet it was only days ago when little Matt Hancock was talking about cases of “the virus” doubling every week.
In fact, the virus peaked, in terms of deaths, in early April, in the UK and in most of Europe. Since then, there has been a steady decline to almost zero, whatever measures were taken or not taken in various countries.
One can see the narrative being prepared: “Britain faced a kind of plague but thanks to the strict measures taken by the Government, it has been brought under control“…
“Boris”, the clown who has scrabbled his way to a prime ministership which he cannot handle, will then be able to half-heartedly present himself as credible.
I am more concerned that this nonsense, carried out over 6 months or more now, has exposed the UK as a country running on empty in all ways. A population easily panicked and willing to accept any manner of stupid (and quite likely legally invalid) “rules”. A Government that veers between dictatorship and complete incompetence. A Parliament which scarcely exists. A police force that bends the knee to black, brown and crazed “antifa” mobs, yet is happy to knock down peaceful (white) elderly protesters in Trafalgar Square and Hyde Park. A university system shown to be useless and pointless. A Border Force that is more like a reception and hotel-allocation service for migrant invaders. It just goes on.
The Jewish but anti-Zionist group, Jewish Voice for Labour, says in the (linked) submission that, inter alia:
“1.3.1 The CAA is not functioning as a charity, but as a highly partisan political campaigning organisation.
1.3.2 Its activities are not genuinely carried on in pursuance of its stated charitable objects and do not significantly contribute to their fulfilment.
1.3.3 Its activities are carried on in ways which are unprofessional and disreputable and are therefore liable to undermine public confidence in the charitable sector.
1.3.4 Its activities are not for the public benefit.“
The submission goes on to say: “5.2 CAA also appears to be the preserve of two people, Gideon Falter, CEO: and Stephen Silverman, who is described as Director of Investigations and Enforcement. The very term “enforcement”, and the presumptions that underlie it, point to the tendency of these two individuals to behave as self-appointed enforcement officers or, to use the popular term, vigilantes. The Applicant will now refer to three examples of this type of conduct.“
The examples mentioned are redacted, but there are many other examples of “CAA” abuse, manipulation of the police and civil regulatory bodies etc. Stephen Silverman (a former music teacher, apparently), and Gideon Falter, someone of no known profession or occupation (but who has wealthy parents and so seems to be some kind of “trustafarian” or similar) are cited as the main individuals engaged in abuse under “CAA” cover.
Joe Glasman, brother of a life peer (who is head of so-called “Blue Labour”) is also mentioned. Joe Glasman was, and has admitted to being, a key figure in the demonization of Jeremy Corbyn and so also key to the “victory by default” of Boris-idiot (presently posing as Prime Minister).
In fact, that troika of troublemakers have others helping to attack those “accused” of “antisemitism”, one being Stephen Applebaum, house-husband and soi-disant “film critic” (though I believe that he has had little published for years).
Applebaum and Silverman (among others) were once very active on Twitter. They delighted in the sadistic trolling of people (mainly women) online, using a number of pseudonymous accounts. Eventually, they were tracked down, and were finally forced to admit that they operated some of those those Twitter accounts. The “CAA’s” own lawyer in one of the court appearances of Alison Chabloz (who had been one of their victims), admitted their involvement in open court (at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, Marylebone Road, London).
Surprisingly, neither Silverman nor Applebaum have been charged, at least as yet, with harassment or any “malcomms” offences. Silverman is now on Twitter (officially) as “@ssilvuk”, while Applebaum not only tweets openly as “@grubstreetsteve” but covertly as (inter alia) “@rattus2384” aka “Raven” (surely “Vulture” would be better?).
The Twitter account “@MaierViv” has plenty of information about the above criminals.
Satirical singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz has been a constant victim of the above criminals, and of other Jewish criminals, prominent among the pack being, notably, a few mentally-afflicted women in North London.
Other victims have included society photographer Jo Stowell, whose business was ruined by those Jews.
The essence of the discussion within social-nationalism in the UK today. A “party”, which may gain power eventually via the ballot box? A grassroots movement based around “community”? Armed insurgency? These are the three main potential paths.
More of that Twitter discussion:
You're fcked with that attitude then. You may retire to your country cottage with Nick Griffin, but you won't be safe there for long either.
Getting elected and achieving political power is the thing that brings real change, the Muslims in Britain know this well. pic.twitter.com/246SEgGHdg
My view? My view is that “all roads lead to Rome”. An approach on several fronts simultaneously is necessary, but at present none of those above-mentioned ways forward exists, in any serious form, in the UK.
I will say that tweeter “@TirChonaill” is very mistaken to focus only on the Muslim aspect. Muslims have far less real power in the UK than the Jews, despite outnumbering the latter by at least 10 to 1.
Very true. I happened to visit a hospital this week (once), not as patient but incidentally. On my brief visit, I noticed that the place was almost deserted, but was told by someone who had just been told by a nurse that within the hospital was a homeless man who —despite being disabled— had nowhere else to go.
It is long since I was at the Bar (2016 officially, 2008 in reality), and even longer since I did any social housing law (about 1994), so I actually do not know whether local authorities still have the duty they once had to house anyone designated as homeless, or whether immigrants and other riff-raff have been allocated all the housing space. Still, pretty disgraceful either way.
…and the word “Jew” was never uttered…
Apparently, the child of the Jew newspaper scribbler, Nick Cohen, denounced a passenger on a London Underground train for not wearing a facemask. Instead of shutting up his rude child, and/or explaining that some passengers are exempt from wearing a mask, Cohen sat there until the passenger had to respond, albeit rudely too.
People may say that I am biased, but I have noticed over the years that almost all young Jew and even part-Jew children seem to be rude, insolent or simply lacking in normal human courtesy. It certainly seems to be a fairly common trait. I have to admit that, over the years, the phrase “the simulacrum of the human” has entered my mind…
Children denouncing adults who are not compliant (or may not be) with (probably legally-invalid) governmental decrees? As Hitchens says elsewhere, reminiscent of Pavel Morozov…[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavlik_Morozov]
This really is becoming ridiculous. “Local lockdowns”, a threatened second national “lockdown”, the population scared out of their stupid skin by deliberate Government action, people forced to wear facemasks and muzzles (enforced by busybodies and nuisances, including toytown police and “Covid marshals”, meaning retired or unemployable pests wearing yellow jackets and carrying clipboards).
The economy is in a far worse state than most want to admit. Huge numbers of people are losing their jobs, their small businesses etc; the NHS has abandoned vast numbers of non-Coronavirus patients; dentists are mostly still not working; young people leaving school and university have very little chance of a job, let alone a decent job.
The Government has so far bought off dissent and opposition: doctors and some other NHS staff have been chucked 4% pay rises even though most are working far less than they were 6 months ago. Business has received some financial help. Employees not able to “work from home” have been furloughed on 80% pay in many cases. Some are even better off, in real terms, than when they were working! This is madness.
The part-Jew public entertainer posing as Prime Minister is a deflated balloon now, and he (andhis mostly Jewish and Indian joke-Cabinet) plainly have no idea what to do except to keep the “Coronavirus” fear propaganda going.
I wonder whether the Government will choose the easy path in November and continue “furlough” payments, or not? “Boris” (Boris-idiot) usually chooses the easy way out, so it may be that payments will continue. If not…
There never should have been a “lockdown” (shutdown) of the economy and society. Only pubs, nightclubs, Tube trains, buses (and those not indefinitel), combined with control of inward flights.
The Government should have concentrated on getting people to behave reasonably (eg by not going to crowded hot venues), washing hands frequently, and so on. Self-help, helped by official advice, not fake “laws” and bullying.
I bet that, once the economy really tanks, the same people who are the greatest zealots for “lockdowns”, facemask muzzles and not opening schools etc will be the most vociferous in wanting more money spent on this, that and the other, money that will not exist thanks to the shutdown of the economy for months (or years?).
I decided to offer the Law Commission my views on that very bad law, so very badly-drafted and so open to abuse (nb. the paragraph-format has been removed):
“Re. Consultation on Communications Act 2003, s.127.
I have just read the following article by a Professor Tettenborn: https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/09/16/we-need-an-overhaul-of-section-127/. I do not know Professor Tettenborn as such, though I did sit as a “Lord Justice of Appeal” with him in 2002, when judging an Exeter University student moot held at the historic Guildhall in Exeter. I was at the time a barrister in chambers in Exeter. Please find below links to my blog pages detailing my own experiences around the notorious “bad law” Communications Act 2003, s.127. While the attached articles are self-explanatory, I should like to make the point that this bad law, poorly drafted, has exercized what I believe a justice of the Court of Appeal once described as “a chilling effect” on legitimate freedom of expression in the UK (one —apparently now-ignored— provision of the 2003 Act even purports to criminalize anything posted online which is deemed “false”!). This law has been used (misused) by, in particular, the pro-Israel “Zionist lobby” or “Jewish lobby”, to attack those with whom it disagrees. A brief search on the Internet will throw up numerous open admissions to that effect, i.e. that Zionist Jews in the UK and USA have been and are using what is sometimes termed “lawfare” against British people in the UK, meaning the making of politically-motivated attacks on people, complaints to police, social media organizations, professional regulatory bodies. Two of the most active abuser-organizations of the law in question are “UK Lawyers for Israel” and the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism”, which overlap in terms of membership. Key individuals engaged in such “lawfare”: Mark Lewis (solicitor, now resident in Israel), Stephen Silverman (resident in South Essex),Gideon Falter (resident in London and elsewhere), and Joe Glasman (resident in London area). There are others, almost all Jewish (there are odd exceptions), as are the three persons just mentioned here. I myself have been a victim of lawfare, partly detailed in the two articles appended. As a result, I have been disbarred (2016), questioned under caution by police (2017) and expelled from Twitter (2018). The organizations above now perch like vultures waiting for selected victims to post something online that they can claim is “grossly offensive”. This is political interference, by a special-interest lobby, with the rights of the citizen. The Communications Act 2003, s.127 is an entirely tyrannical (and badly-drafted) piece of legislation. Free speech must be protected now. By “free speech” I mean speech, and other communication and publication, on socio-political, historical and religious subjects. Thank you for your attention. Please note that I require no reply. Ian Millard These are the articles mentioned above: https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/when-i-was-a-victim-of-a-malicious-zionist-complaint/; and https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/the-slide-of-the-english-bar-and-uk-society-continues-and-accelerates/
I hope that the Law Commission finds my articles and views of interest. At least someone is willing to speak the truth. If no-one else does, I have to…
Professor Tettenborn finishes his article thus: “Nevertheless, this is a proposal that undoubtedly takes the law in the way it should be going, and increases freedom of speech. It may not go as far as you wish, but it is better than nothing. Even better, it is merely a proposal, and the Law Commission welcomes comments on it. This is your chance. You have until 18 December. Any comments should go to email@example.com or to Online Communications Team, Law Commission, 1st Floor, Tower, 52 Queen Anne’s Gate, London, SW1H 9AG. Feel free.”
So do it…
I might add that the Professor, though he mentions silly “Count Dankula” and his saluting dog, overlooks victims such as Jez Turner, Alison Chabloz, and me, among others. Still, better half a pint than no pint.
Answer came there none…
Other tweets seen
Below, a good example of the incredible madness that has taken root:
There could be a place for someone with such skills…
These people should be on our side…and want to be.
For all their toughness, some of these Russian airborne troops are very decent people. I knew several former members of the Soviet VDV (Air Descent Contingent) when I lived in Almaty, Kazakhstan in 1996-1997. Very solid people.
Their parachuting skills are certainly in a different league from mine! My report card from my first jump (over Salisbury Plain in, I think, 1977, maybe 1978), made out by a former sergeant of the Parachute Regiment, said “exit slow, no position, no count, no effort; landing OK.”! The slow exit referred to was me having to climb out of the small cabin of a Cessna and halfway along the wing, while gripping at a strut, before casting off into the void (backwards…); you were then supposed to get into a certain body configuration in the air, while shouting out a count of 1-10. This is not easy! After that, floating peacefully thousands of feet down to Salisbury Plain was “a doddle”. Do people really do it for fun?!
TheExtinction Rebellion activities bring matters of free speech to the fore
“What we are facing here are fanatics: members of an apocalyptic, end-times cult. A cult dedicated to immiserating our society and intimidating anybody who stands in their way. It is high time that they were stopped. It is time that the police move in to arrest them and disrupt their activities. It is time for our politicians and public figures to unite in deprecating their actions. And it is time that we unify again around a core principle: that open debate is the best way to have any difficult question out, and that ceding control to radicals of any stripe is not just where debate stops. It is where a free society ends.” [Douglas Murray, Daily Telegraph]
I suppose that Douglas Murray was collecting his money from the Henry Jackson Society or other NWO/ZOG organizations when he might have been defending my free speech rights. On the other hand, Murray would not want his lucrative media career to finish. One word from “them” and it would be the end of Murray as go-to talking head…
I also never saw or heard Douglas Murray defend the free speech rights of Jez Turner (of the now-destroyed London Forum), who was imprisoned for making a speech in Whitehall; or for that matter, those of Alison Chabloz, prosecuted for posting online her satirical songs.
Both Jez Turner and Alison Chabloz were targets of the malicious Jew-Zionist pressure group, “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”], as also I was and remain.
The same is true of the Charlie Hebdo events. The System politicians from all over the EU defended the magazine when it attacked Islam and was then attacked by Islamists, but it rarely attacks the Jew-Zionists who more or less rule France now. As for those political drones, they are in the pocket of of the Jewish/Zionist/Israel lobby and try to censor any criticism of Jews or their behaviour.
1000's of people have left their homes and family, travelled 1000's of miles, paid £1000's to people traffickers & risked their lives to live in this supposedly racist country. How does that make sense? https://t.co/8urxxRh7WR
“They” —aka (((they)))— happened to Britain, basically, Monsieur Daubney. “They” are at the root of it all, and it is because would-be politicians from “controlled opposition” fake parties such as UKIP and Brexit Party would not and will not acknowledge the centrality of the European struggle against “them” that we are on the brink of socio-political meltdown.
Lunacy posing as protest
A strange cult posing as the answer to the problems of the world.
Tempus fugit, and similar truisms…I recall seeing, en passant, the now-deceased lady who wrote the first two of those pieces, when I was sitting in the library of the GB-USSR Association in the early 1980s; about 1983.
The GB-USSR Association was a cultural and para-diplomatic organization mainly funded by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Lubrication for diplomatic/cultural interchange in the Cold War, if you like. A parallel body existed in Moscow.
The London HQ of the UK body had a rather nice set-up in Grosvenor Place, overlooking the gardens of Buckingham Palace. It had a Director (a rather unwelcoming fellow called John Roberts, I think about 50 or so, who had fluent Russian, learned in the 1950s during National Service and at Cambridge, where he was sent during part of his service), and two full-time librarians (paid Civil Service rates). I believe that I heard at some much later time that the younger of the two librarians eventually, in the 1990s, became the main librarian at the new, and now famous, Thames-side HQ of SIS/MI6. Perhaps.
The said Roberts was very well-connected and, in those days when your “occupation” had to be written in your passport (based on what the applicant wrote on the application form), had —I heard on good authority— “Diplomat” written in his passport, even though he was not one, at least in the accepted sense. In those days, I had a far less plausible occupation written in my own passport.
The GB-USSR had a good library which I often used, and it put on interesting occasional talks, though I missed the best of the lot (I was told), which was given by “John le Carre” (David Cornwell) one evening.
I remember a very attractive tall blonde woman who looked about 29 (if that) coming in with at least two and maybe three small dogs on leads, and going into the office of the Director. I later discovered that that was his new wife. I was unaware until yesterday that she was at the time already about 40.
In the TV series, the main character, Magnus Pym, is brilliantly played (as adult) by Peter Egan; the wife of the SIS officer in Switzerland was, I think, one Felicity, played by actress Fiona Mollison.
Now that the GB-USSR lady is deceased (as is Roberts, her husband), I can say without seeming too rude that the intervening years were not kind to her (the same might be said of many of us!), looking at the photos. To be frank, I should not have recognized her from the photos I have just seen in the past day. There again, few would recognize me from the photograph of me aged 35…
I was struck some time ago by the changes seen a few years ago, in a BBC provincial news report and on a website, about people I met when volunteering on an organic farm in Wales about 40 years ago. The farmer was still recognizable, but his wife, whom I recall as a pretty sexy and shapely lady of about 35 (albeit very moody, to the point of being a real pain in the neck), was now almost spherical, in fact like a snowman without the snow: a small sphere sitting atop a large sphere.
These apparently random thoughts and reminiscences are in fact just my way of underlining how transitory is our time on this Earth in any one incarnation. We must do what we can to create a current of positive effect which will influence the course of history.
Above, a typical example of nice, polite, English protest…Write to “your” MP, ask for an explanation as to why…blah blah blah. I have a different view of what should be done, but if I blog about it here, I shall probably have the toytown police and the poundland KGB here tomorrow morning…
“Drongoes“! I have not heard that term of opprobrium since I was 12 and a child in an Australian school!
Jew lawyer found guilty of inventing “antisemitic” attack
In reality, a black or even mixed population will never be able to enslave even a far smaller-in-number European/”white” population; the whites will either triumph over the blacks and rule them, or leave to be rid of the blacks and their inability to maintain a civilized society (in the absence of white skills and thinking patterns…), as has largely happened in South Africa: even the craven whites who opposed apartheid and emigrated have no wish to return to be ruled by the increasingly anti-white blacks in a society where whites are increasingly seen as enemies and, indeed, prey.
How come we simultaneously demand integration yet allow (non white) people to celebrate their culture and identity? https://t.co/XMsngHmFFp
Below, a photograph of wha is said to be the same Jew (presumably recently), toting what looks superficially like a silenced submachinegun, but which is in fact (I think) an “airsoft gun” used in games: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airsoft_gun
What made me laugh about that Jewish Chronicle piece was that the other Jew mentioned, a business operator, was driven out of the UK, it seems; at any rate, he left…
One of the aspects of the present madness that interests me is not only how supine half of the public has been, but the extent to which the kind of people most rebellious, and also vocal about “rights”, in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, are now the most eager to submit to State authority: the “socialists”, “Left-wingers” (I myself disparage such “right”/”left” terminology, though), civil rights activists etc.
Don’t believe me? Look on Twitter. The kind of people in the categories just listed are all but begging to be “locked down”, monitored, tested, traced, masked, muzzled and generally told what to do, when to do it, and what to wear while doing it.
As I have blogged in the past, the degeneration of that part of the body politic is palpable.
You see it in other ways too: the wish not to leave the EU, because the EU (they imagine) will control things, control them, lay down rules for everything…
Again, you see it in the wish to be subject to the arbitrary constraints of Twitter and other online platforms; and the allied wish to “report” those whose views dissent from the shibboleths of the Twit-pack.
Such people are also the most fervent supporters of the muzzling of the population…
More tweets seen
Below, two tweets about the latest Jewish or anti-Corbyn legal activity:
Mark Lewis cannot be “disbarred”, because he is not and never has been a barrister, though he is a solicitor and (at least as yet) not struck off.
I have blogged fairly extensively (mostly in 2018 and 2019) about Lewis and his conspiratorial, unhinged and disgraceful behaviour:
Have a read of the above. Lewis was and is aware of everything I wrote about and against him; his Jew-Zionist friends and allies monitor my writings obsessively and have done for years: Lewis himself has been obsessed with me for years, since 2011 or 2012, and has plotted against me for all that time. Lewis has never sued me, though; indeed, he has never even threatened to sue me, despite everything that I have written, but has tried to strike at me covertly. (((Typical))).
The other Jews in the Mark Lewis/”Campaign Against Antisemitism” etc cabal(s) are aghast that Lewis and his clients cannot extract both flesh and blood from Corbyn; here below, fanatical Jew Zionist David Collier:
The tweet below made me laugh! I dare say that even Lewis himself might be (albeit bitterly) amused by it.
Even Lewis’s enemies often tend to accept him at his own valuation (and self-publicizing) as so-called “top lawyer”; yet at the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal in 2018, those judging him were told by Lewis’s own Counsel that all he owned were a mobility scooter, a private pension worth £70 a week, and his own clothes! Even discounting the usual tendency of Jews (cf. Ghislaine “Maxwell”) to play the Jewish “victim” when caught out, I doubt that Lewis has millions (or anything much) salted away.
Below, some interesting quotations:
Of course, the “Jew who dislikes Jews” is a not-uncommon figure: in the historical past, Marx for one, who wrote to Engels “I am in Ramsgate; nothing but Jews and bedbugs“; through those figures cited in the tweet above, and on to the anti-Zionist Jews of today such as Miko Peled and Gilad Atzmon.
Yet another MP sex scandal. Almost normalized now. This particular idiot is apparently unsure whether he prefers girls or boys, so ineptly tries to have it off with both.
What still astounds me is the sheer mediocrity (at best) of so many MPs these days. So few have even a modicum of education, culture, or real belief in anything at all, let alone any genuine desire to serve the country or their constituents. Just trash, really.
When I became aware of the existence of Rob Roberts (about an hour ago), I was wondering whether he would make a good candidate for my Deadhead MPs series on this blog, but sadly he seems (judging by his Wikipedia entry) to have nothing interesting about him at all. Nothing. See for yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Roberts_(politician)
In the local authority area where I live (a quite large area of nearly 300 square miles in coastal and near-coastal Southern England, rural and semi-rural, with a few small towns and villages), the population is about 180,000 people. The “R” number has been varying below 1 and 2 (ie. number of cases per 100,000 population). In the past week, 1.8. There have been, therefore, about 2 or 3 confirmed new cases in the past week. Out of 180,000 people…
When you consider that only one out of dozens, perhaps a hundred, new cases will die from this condition, you can see that, in this particular area, perhaps one or two people are likely to die from “the virus” over the course of the next year! Sad for those people and their relatives, but not repeat not a reason to shut anything down, nor to make the population wear facemasks.
This is, thankfully, not the Plague.
Britain needs a kind of SS force.
More tweets seen
The tweeter above, “Sarah Deech” or “@londonette”, is the daughter, I believe, of “baroness” Deech, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Deech,_Baroness_Deech, a Jewish woman who, when my “case” was being “investigated” by the Bar Standards Board from 2014 (the case having been brought against me, in effect, by “UK Lawyers for Israel”), was not only the Chair of the Bar Standards Board but also a Patron of…UK Lawyers for Israel!
By the time that the case came up before the Bar Disciplinary Tribunal, it having been decided that my (in the end, only) 5 supposedly “grossly offensive” tweets (out of between 150,000-200,000 tweets and retweets!) merited my being “tried”, “baroness” Deech had in fact been replaced by a different Chair, though only by a former UK Amassador to Israel, who was extremely pro-Israel and extremely pro-Jewish interests!
I raised the question of perceived bias (in the decision to take me before a Tribunal) at the hearing itself , but the (generally reasonably fair) retired Circuit Judge chairing the 5-person panel told me at least twice that whatever the merits of my claim that the decision-making process was flawed (because, as I submitted, “justice must not only be done but be seen to be done” and “no man can be a judge in his own cause“), it was not relevant , because what mattered was the justice of the hearing itself…
With all respect to that judge, I disagree. If a person is only “tried” because a biased process decided that he should be tried, then he is on the back foot from the start, no matter how “fair” the hearing is.
The above, in my view, is so even if “baroness” Deech took no part in the decision to haul me before the Bar Disciplinary Tribunal, though I find it hard to believe that she was, at the material time, unaware that an organization in which she was a major figure (UK Lawyers for Israel) was complaining officially about me to another organization which she headed and for which she had responsibility (the Bar Standards Board).
As a matter of fact, the hearing in October 2016, though generally fair in the way it was conducted, was wrong about, inter alia, whether my five tweets (the Jews had originally complained about many dozens!) were in fact “grossly offensive”.
In fact, I could have appealed the findings of fact and/or the disbarment penalty, but, having ceased Bar practice in 2008, eight years before I was “tried” and disbarred, it would have been almost pointless. I did not care, though it does deprive me of being able to lunch at my (former) Inn when in London, which is a nuisance; I rarely visit London these days anyway.
Actually, the BSB did write to me a couple of years after I was disbarred, saying that I should have had the right to challenge the allocation of my case to a 5-person panel instead of a 3-person panel (only a 5-person panel can disbar) and that I could do so if I wished. I could not be bothered and so did not take that up.
Peter Hitchens is right to keep “banging on” about all of the lies and mistakes around the “Coronavirus” situation in the UK. The virus itself is scarcely even an issue now, in reality, but the repressive measures taken to (supposedly) contain it are being strengthened even as the virus ceases to be present in much of the country; in fact, in many parts of the UK, “Coronavirus” has always been something happening to other people in other places, and read about in newspapers (if anyone still reads them), or seen on the —now terminally-boring— BBC News propaganda.
Thought about the UK and the whole “Western” world today…
“We shall soon be in a world in which a man may be howled down for saying that two and two make four, in which people will persecute the heresy of calling a triangle a three-sided figure, and hang a man for maddening a mob with the news that grass is green.” [G.K. Chesterton]
I have so little confidence in the cultural level of most British people today (I take no direct interest in most of the other rabble tribes that live on these islands) that I suppose that I should link to Wikipedia in case some people have no idea who G.K. Chesterton even was…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton
Some other tweets and news seen today
Now if only Stuchbery would stick to tweeting about this sort of thing, and drop the “antifa” nonsense…The tweet above is genuinely interesting.
It was obvious from the start that Keir Starmer is totally in the pocket of the Jew/Israel/Zionist lobby. His wife is a Jewish lawyer, and their children are being brought up as Jewish. I understand that they have “buy to let” properties.
Oh, this is Lewis on Twitter, by the way:
Please refer to the above-designated blog posts to learn more.
More about Labour
Under Keir Starmer, Labour has recovered from the Jew-orchestrated msm anti-Corbyn barrage of last year, which led to Labour’s opinion poll ratings bumping along the bottom, hugely behind the misnamed “Conservatives”. However that may be, Labour is still 5-10 points adrift.
I see little popular enthusiasm for Labour, even as this most incompetent government lurches from lie to stupid policy to muzzling the population to scandal to more lies. Indeed, Starmer has nothing to say except to say that the “Conservatives” should do what they are doing, but harder and better. Underwhelming.
Prospects in UK politics
It is clear that, despite a government so incompetent that even its own party members are disgusted by it, the Boris-idiot/Dominic Cummings regime is here to stay, at least for the next couple of years. The 80-seat Commons majority guarantees that, pretty much.
The Labour Party, like the Conservative Party, is now back under what amounts to Jewish lobby control or strong influence. Labour is now just a rubbish “alternative”. That was in most respects true under Corbyn, but at least Labour was to some extent anti-Zionist.
I think that my assessment of Corbyn, 4 years ago, has been proven correct: yes, anti-Zionist, but still willing to play the Jews’ tune when it comes to the “holocaust” farrago. Weak. Corbyn was also willing to see the UK swamped by the non-white “ethnics”.
Corbyn was at root not sufficiently or properly ideological. His academic record was poor, his work record almost non-existent. Apart from a couple of years bumming around aged about 19, mainly in Jamaica, Cuba and South America, he knows little of the world, as far as can be seen.
Also, Corbyn’s economic and social knowledge is very shallow. One of his ex-wives says that he rarely if ever reads a book. Any book.
As it stands, Labour supports almost all the policies of the Boris-idiot government of fools. Hard to think what of substance Labour would change, were it in power, though Starmer is probably a better administrator than Boris-idiot. Well, that after all would scarcely be a difficult challenge!
Boris-idiot has no real ideas beyond schoolboy ones such as bridges across the sea etc. “Boris” has no idea how to administer anything at all, and has never done so. He is basically a part-Jew public entertainer whose jokes are rapidly falling very flat with the public.
The economic hit which is coming, largely because of the “lockdown” and facemask nonsense supported by both Government and Opposition, will strain the rivets of the society and state to the utmost over the next 2+ years. The NWO/ZOG System does not much care, controlling as it does the 2-3 “main parties”. The ZOG idea is “where can they (the voters) go?”
In principle, the answer should be “we need a social-national party”. The problems are that, first, the anti-democratic laws and institutions Blair laid down (Electoral Commission, Equalities Commission etc) make it almost impossible to have a functioning real social-national party.
Beyond that, one has to look at the British people. They are not at present the material from which a real party, such as the NSDAP of the 1920s, could be formed. They are mostly interested in those new opiates of the people, sports and msm “celebrity” nonsense. In some ways, we are in “Weimar”, but in other ways not.
I have, in earlier blog posts, set out my view, that the social-national elements need to concentrate in one area of the country, creating a Schwerpunkt. That may include the creation of a party, whether registered as such or not. A political party, however, cannot be the sole focus.
Alison Chabloz on Bitchute internet radio
An interesting discussion, conducted with Alison Chabloz and others, on one of the few social-national internet platforms of any value:
Peter Hitchens addresses the Leicester Coronavirus (supposed) “hot spot”:
Meanwhile, the Common Purpose socio-politicization of the police continues apace:
Yes, it must be hard for the termites eating away at British society to reconcile support for (mostly fake) “refugees”, and also for mass immigration of backward peoples into the UK, with support for contemporary decadence.
In the end, the USA will become some kind of dictatorship or near-dictatorship. Maybe oligarchic, maybe not. All the elements are there, just under the surface. The overwhelming power of Federal institutions and agencies such as the FBI, the long-time supervening-power of Federal laws and regulations over State or local ones (eg via the notorious “Commerce Clause” of the US Constitution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause.
Then you have the huge size of the USA, and its equally large population: about 328 million people in nearly 4 million square miles. The EU (even without the UK) has more people (450 million) but in a smaller area (1.6 million square miles); but the EU is not (yet) one state.
Very large states are rarely very democratic: in the contemporary world, China, Russia. The EU has become less democratic as the states comprising it have increased in number and converged, and as its population and area have increased.
A large state (large both in area and population) tends to need a very strong police and/or secret/political police to keep it together: KGB (now FSB, within Russia), FBI etc.
The above is not an immutable rule, but a likely tendency, anyway.
Then one has the “diversity” aspect. “Diverse” populations lead to a centrifugal effect. The state may come apart, fall apart. The socio-political police have the effect of countering that, providing a centripetal power.
You can even see that in the UK: as mass immigration has torn much of society apart, there have been enacted ever-more repressive laws to repress free speech and political activity, and the police have become, increasingly, “thought police”, or at least (as I would say) “a poundland KGB”.
I wonder how long the Parler platform will last. Maybe not so long as a “free speech” enclave. No doubt the Jew mob on Twitter, and their pathetic “antifa” dupes, will infiltrate it, while at the same time trying to get it defunded, or closed down. They may be missing the point though. Twitter is largely a waste of time, certainly from the point of view of tweeters (if they imagine that they are influencing society or politics); GAB, Parler etc, even more so.
In the end, online activity can only be a corollary, so to speak, parasitic upon “real world” activity. A million Twitter or Facebook “likes” or “followers”, are not worth a thousand boots on the ground, or even a dozen.
Other tweets seen
Last night American Renaissance, Dr David Duke, Richard Spencer & Stefan Molyneux were all removed from YouTube. Their 'crime' was merely pushing back against the liberal anti-white narrative – none of them ever advocated violence. It's time to support @bitchute
Well, supporting Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/ is all well and good, but is no ultimate answer to the wave of repression now engulfing the West. Posting and looking at videos and vlogs is harmless, of course, and may even lead to some good, but what the West (especially Europe) needs is concrete results…
After weeks of violence, rioting, looting, vandalism & anti-white attacks by BLM & Antifa, the media want to convince you that the 'far-right' pose the biggest threat to the safety of the American people. What an utter joke! pic.twitter.com/HYb8HKQs7r
In the USA, the blacks (and “antifa”) are revolting. If Trump (not that I “support” him) were a quarter of the tyrant many claim him to be, he would have had the National Guard or others shoot down these dogs.
Boris-idiot has just announced a £5 billion spending package. In principle, I am all in favour of newer (if better) hospitals, schools etc. I wonder, though, whether the money for school building might not have been better spent on actual education.
Anyone who meets teachers, or sees them on TV quiz shows, must be appalled at the sheer lack of knowledge they display, in almost all cases. This is a consequence of the fact that, in big-picture terms, teaching in schools, certainly in the UK, is a low-status and often relatively low-income occupation. That is especially so in the State school system, and especially for those who are not promoted to school heads.
The fact is that many teachers, perhaps especially in the State sector, are pig-ignorant. This has in fact always been a big problem in the UK.
My solution for the above is to make teaching a more valued occupation: higher entry standards, higher and more nuanced pay (eg more pay for more proven knowledge), less paperwork; and more teaching, less wasting time in the school day, and more in-depth teaching. A thoroughgoing reform of the primary and secondary educational sectors. Another reform for universities, but that is a separate issue.
Regular readers of this blog will know that, in the past week, I have blogged briefly, a couple of times, about how Alison Chabloz has, in effect, won her appeal against conviction for alleged breaches of a condition of her suspended sentence (of mid-2018), in that the Crown Prosecution Service [CPS] has thrown in the towel, and has decided not to offer evidence against her at the appeal hearing (set down for 10 July 2020; that had been changed to only a so-called “mention”, the full hearing to have been later in the year).
The CPS gave as its reason for surrendering, that to proceed was “not in the public interest“, a fig-leaf to cover up the real or main reason, which was that there had been political interference from, firstly, the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [CAA], which initially suborned the Police and Crime Commissioner for Derbyshire, a dim Sikh and Labour Party drone, as a result of which Alison Chabloz was messed around both wrongfully and unlawfully by Derbyshire Police, and later also by the Metropolitan Police.
The CPS obviously wanted to avoid the bad publicity which might have leaked out about how the Jewish lobby controls and influences politicians at both high and low levels, and interferes with the course of justice in the UK. So they gave up opposition to Alison’s appeal, in order to save face.
I do intend to blog more fully about Alison Chabloz’s situation, but not for a day or so. This is merely (if you like) a non-judicial “mention” of my own.
The “CAA” had applied pressure on the then Justice Secretary (and so joke “Lord Chancellor”), Conservative Friend of Israel, and expenses cheat/freeloader, David Gauke (who is now no longer even an MP). He pressured the CPS, who pressured the privatized probation monkeys.
Lo and behold! A prosecution was raised, a good defence was offered, but Alison Chabloz was convicted all the same, by a district judge (magistrate) in Derbyshire, and was sentenced to 8 weeks. She actually spent a few days in prison before being released on bail pending appeal. I blogged about that at the time.
As it is, though, Alison Chabloz has now achieved a stunning victory over the police, the probation monkeys, the CPS and, best of all, the CAA conspirators.
In fact, the CAA is running scared. I notice that they have completely taken out of their website the page formerly naming their “patrons”. When it was up, it included such Jews as “baroness” Deech, of Oxford, and the disgraced (and increasingly-infirm) “Mark Lewis Lawyer” of (now) Eilat, Israel.
In fact, Alison Chabloz still has one minor problem, despite being out of the woods as far as the 2018 “CAA” matter is concerned, and now that she has in effect succeeded in her appeal (the net result of all the CAA conspiring and snooping was that she suffered a few arrests, a few days in police custody, 2-3 days in a not-too-bad women’s prison and various other inconveniences such as days of trial etc).
The other minor problem is that another malicious Jewish complainant, probably connected with the CAA, made some sort of contrived complaint about what Alison said on an online “radio” show nearly a year ago. As a result, Alison has been further messed around, and has been on purported “police bail” now for many months and, purportedly, barred from posting on her blog (etc) (again).
In other words, the police may well be acting unlawfully in keeping Alison Chabloz on police bail (with conditions, at that) since (if memory serves) sometime in late 2019, and certainly since January 2020.
Alison Chabloz’s Counsel applied to Court to terminate the conditions some time ago, but failed in respect of the “posting on Internet” bar.
Just think about that: a policeman, in the UK of 2020, may choose to impose an Internet ban (as far as posting is concerned), purportedly running for months! That, on the say-so of some stray malicious Jew! It must be (I think, is) unlawful. Was the court in Derbyshire in error in maintaining that condition of bail, or have I —after all, I am no longer a “lawyer”, as such— missed something?
True, a court has now pronounced, but I cannot see how that can legitimize an already-illegitimate conditional police bail.
My guess is that the latest malicious attempt by a Jew or a pack of Jews to pervert the course of justice will fail (I very much doubt whether Alison will be charged with anything), but in a sense, “they” have partly succeeded, in that Alison Chabloz has been prevented from exercizing her right to free speech for months. Also, a crowd of (largely non-white) police invaded her dwelling when she was (last) arrested, a few months ago, and stayed there for 1-2 hours, while she was still in pyjamas!
I have only seen one tweet about Alison’s recent total victory over the CAA and CPS (the CAA conspirators themselves are maintaining “radio silence”, it seems):
“Labour” Party news
Keir Starmer’s new “compliance” chief: a Jew lawyer who has worked in marketing and “finance”…
“Party insiders say Mr Barros-Curtis has also been at the centre of high-profile decisions to recommend the suspension of Labour members and councillors over recent weeks – including over complaints about antisemitism that had previously not been acted upon.”
“The marketing consultant had previously worked as Sir Keir’s head of compliance during his successful campaign to lead Labour…he is said to have worked extensively on derivatives and structured finance matters in Europe and Hong Kong; as well as formerly working for the Clinton Foundation.”[Jewish Chronicle]