Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, this week my 6/10 scored a clear victory over the 3/10 of political journalist John Rentoul. I did not know the answers to questions 2, 6, 7, and 9.

Talking point

That is a screenshot from my one-time Twitter account, which ran from about 2010 to 2018, when a pack of Jews conspired together to mass-report me to Twitter. The result was that I was expelled from Twitter and my account deleted. However, that was a blessing in disguise because, as a result of my Twitter account having been deleted, potential “evidence” against me on mooted (but never made) charges of “incitement to racial hatred” could not be found, and the provenance of alleged tweets could not be established.

Once again, the Jewish/Israel lobby shot itself in the foot, in other words.

I think the point made in the pinned tweet is even more valid in 2026.

“Youngest (and black) professor at Cambridge is a plagiarist”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/07/24/cambridges-diversity-poster-boy-in-plagiarism-row/?recomm_id=d551a520-1bb7-47ec-af05-75f34c451598

Even leaving aside the plagiarism, the academic world and society should bin fake academic disciplines such as sociology, particularly the jargon-ridden type so prevalent today. You often find that Jewish individuals are prominent in all that. For example:

“Supporters of Prof Arday became aware last year of questions about his academic legitimacy, and responded with furious accusations of racism.

Prof Sir Simon Baron-Cohen, the director of Cambridge’s autism research centre, and cousin of the comedian Sacha Baron-Cohen, and Ricardo Sabates, professor of education, circulated an open letter under the heading: “URGENT PLEASE SIGN ANTI-RACISM LETTER FOR JASON ARDAY.”

[Daily Telegraph]

[Update, 30 July 2026: seems that the Daily Telegraph agrees with my points… https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/07/29/academia-has-a-much-bigger-problem-than-plagiarism/

“Cambridge chose to ignore the warning on the basis that the allegedly plagiarised research was “not within our remit” because it had not been completed at their university. They were too busy basking in the DEI glow of a professor who had beaten seemingly insurmountable odds: struggling with autism, non-verbal until the age of 11, unable to read and write until he was 18 (somewhat implausible given he did manage to secure two GCSEs).

When Arday did face criticism, he knew how to weaponise the progressive machine against defectors. In response to an email from Harris citing concerns about plagiarism he complained that “instead of spending your time trying to dismantle racism and ableism, you have spent what I assume is hours combing through my work looking for mistakes” and that “anything further from you will be considered bullying and harassment”.

The second truth is that Jason Arday has succeeded in a field of academia where genuinely good work simply does not exist. Good critical race theory isn’t a thing. Academia should function as a tool to expand and deepen human knowledge. PhDs are meant to establish previously unknown facts about the world. But for a long time, sociology simply hasn’t done this.

Let’s look at some of the work that Arday is alleged to have plagiarised. His PhD was titled “An exploration of peer-monitoring among student teachers’ [sic] to inform reflective practice within the context of action research”. This means absolutely nothing. The purpose of his work “was to analyse and synthesise existing literature and research in order to better understand the multi-faceted nature of reflected practice”…

[Daily Telegraph]

The only aspect left out of that Telegraph piece is, as one might expect, the Jewish aspect in sociology teaching.]

Tweets seen

Every announcement Burnham has made so far has been an attempt to get voters from various directions onside. Only in time will it become clear that Burnham’s various announcements are 95% hot air. So, yes, he may well be thinking of holding a general election before his government fails on all fronts.

Burnham faces a “Devil’s alternative”, in that he presently has 403 Labour MPs. An election sometime soon would reduce that number considerably, perhaps to 250 or 300. However, to hang on until 2028 or 2029 might result in Labour reducing to 200 or even 100.

[“The Guardian: “Iran, using Chinese satellite imagery and tactics learned from Russia’s war in Ukraine, is bombing American bases and vital infrastructure in the Persian Gulf with increasing accuracy.
Iran has maintained an effective missile capability, which the new leadership is prepared to use.
Iranian missiles have a sophisticated navigation system and simultaneously use American GPS, Chinese BeiDou, and Russian GLONASS for targeting.“]

It might be more than a joke in 10 years’ time…

I am currently enjoying my week of free access to the Daily Telegraph, my favourite section being the obituaries. However, the reportage and particularly the comment elsewhere in the newspaper is so pro-Jewish lobby, so pro-Israel, that I shall certainly not be paying to continue to read it.

The msm in the UK show a completely one-sided picture of the present conflict; the terror attacks on Russian civilians by the Kiev regime are rarely covered.

I should say that Burnham has until the end of the year to bite the bullet and call a general election; any time after that, and he is toast, Labour is toast.

Stop paying out for migrant invaders (food, housing, transport, NHS/dental, police, prison spaces etc), and stop throwing money at the Jewish/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev. Just those two economies would save enormous amounts, enough to fund adult social care for British people, and decent pensions.

Who needs him? Who wants him? Yes, he and his cabal got him elected (just) as MP for some no-hope place near Manchester. Now he suddenly poses as Prime Minister. Completely invalid in real-world politics.

I notice that Reform UK is still ahead of Labour in the opinion polls, though only by a couple of points. However, the Greens are sinking, which promotes Labour and will mitigate electoral losses; Burnham’s convoluted statements seem to have slightly mollified 2024 Green voters (both the Muslims and other non-whites, and the white anti-Israel-ers).

Burnham is behaving more like a regional politician from some devolved government rather than a head of UK government.

Incidentally, about 65% of the UK population lives south of Birmingham, and about 37% of the UK population lives in the South and South-East (including London).

For God’s sake! Enough!

This needs a Betjeman to chronicle it. Instead of “a light blue carpet on the stair, and Lady Mary standing there” (probably a misquote) something involving a swimming pool, shady places, and some ice-cold vegetable okroshka.

Both main System parties are to blame.

Also, why have “wards” been largely done away with in many advanced countries (they have this thing called hospital “rooms” for 1-2 people), but are still considered normal in the backward UK?

“Our NHS”…supposedly.

This country is becoming a multikulti dystopia.

Late music