Free Speech—Alison Chabloz wins a victory but still faces attack

[above: persecuted satirical singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz]

I have blogged previously about singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz, who was prosecuted (at first privately) by the malicious Jew-Zionist pressure group, “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”]. The Crown Prosecution Service [“CPS”] then took over her case and continued the prosecution, dropping some charges but substituting others:

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/blogger-alison-chabloz-who-described-auschwitz-as-a-theme-park-on-trial-1.451792

In June 2018, Alison Chabloz was convicted in the “Westminster Mags”, amid allegations (never disproven; au contraire) of Jew-Zionist backstairs manipulations in the case. She was sentenced to a term of imprisonment (suspended), a financial penalty, hundreds of hours of unpaid work, a one-year social media ban (etc), all for having sung (and posted online) songs exposing a few of the hundreds of proven “holocaust” fakes and hoaxes!

[above: Elie Wiesel, a major “holocaust” fantasist]

Incidentally, Elie Wiesel was also a would-be terrorist: “In 1946, after learning of the Irgun‘s bombing of the King David Hotel, Wiesel made an unsuccessful attempt to join the underground Zionist movement.” [Wikipedia]

91 killed, 46-49 injured…

Ninety-one people were killed, most of them being staff of the hotel or Secretariat: 21 were first-rank government officials; 49 were second-rank clerks, typists and messengers, junior members of the Secretariat, employees of the hotel and canteen workers; 13 were soldiers; 3 policemen; and 5 were members of the public. By nationality, there were 41 Arabs, 28 British citizens, 17 Jews, 2 Armenians, 1 Russian, 1 Greek and 1 Egyptian.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing

Jews such as Stephen Applebaum (a soi-disant “film critic” and proven Internet troll, who targeted women online), of the CAA pressure group, are even today defending that act of egregious terrorism, saying that “a warning was given”. Even if true, that does not excuse the Jew terrorists. The IRA used to “give warnings” shortly before their bloody outrages. Does that excuse them?

Irene Zisblatt is another well-known fraud:

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/01/irene-zisblatt-diamond-girl-fact-or.html

https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/irene-zisblatt-says-that-she-was-put-on-a-train-at-auschwitz-by-a-sonderkommando-boy-who-wouldnt-tell-her-his-name/

https://carolynyeager.net/holocaust-scholar-finds-%E2%80%9Cdiamond-girl%E2%80%9D-be-work-fiction

The posts below show the progress of Alison’s fight for truth and justice:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/alison-chabloz-the-fight-for-freedom-of-expression-goes-on/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/04/18/alison-chabloz-the-show-goes-on/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/06/18/alison-chabloz-lost-a-battle-but-the-war-goes-on-and-she-is-winning-it/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/09/24/the-persecution-of-alison-chabloz-latest-news-from-the-kangaroo-courts/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2020/06/30/diary-blog-30-june-2020/

[above: Alison Chabloz in 2018, en route to Westminster Magistrates’ Court, accompanied by her Counsel, Adrian Davies, and supporters]

Alison Chabloz in fact has now won a victory on points, so to speak. Of the original sentence (which she appealed, unsuccessfully) the prison term (20 weeks) was suspended for 2 years, and has now expired; the unpaid work was refused after a few days, and the requirement for it was then removed by another magistrate; the social media bar was neatly sidestepped and ignored.

Alison Chabloz had not paid her pound of flesh, according to the cowardly sadists of the “CAA”, so they tried to punish her more by claiming that she had breached a condition of her original sentence by blogging on her WordPress blog.

At first, the privatized probation people and CPS refused to play ball, so the CAA pressure group applied political pressure via a dim Sikh who is the Police and Crime Commissioner for the beleagured Derbyshire Constabulary, and (more significantly) via venal David Gauke, a pro-Israel solicitor who was, at the time, Secretary of State for Justice (but who lost his seat and is now no longer an MP). Gauke got the Ministry of Justice to pressure the CPS and the probation organization. Alison was prosecuted for “breach of condition”, found guilty (ludicrously, on the facts) in a Derbyshire magistrates’ court, and sentenced to 8 weeks’ imprisonment! After two days, she was out on bail pending appeal.

In the event, the CPS was unwilling to disclose papers that would have proven political interference in the prosecution. The CPS therefore surrendered to Alison Chabloz by telling the Derby Crown Court that it would not be presenting any evidence. A face-saver. The CPS and CAA have been shamed and dismissed! The appeal hearing has already been taken out of the list. A victory for Alison Chabloz.

[above: “Get down there where you wanted to send me, you unclean spirit!”]

In fact, the CAA conspirators and other Jews have not entirely given up persecuting Alison Chabloz. Last summer (2019), Alison appeared on an Internet “radio” show. That gave Stephen Silverman, the Jew who calls himself “Head of Investigations and Enforcement” at the CAA, his opportunity to make yet another malicious complaint, this time to the police at Derby.

As a result, Alison Chabloz was yet again arrested and questioned by Derby police, who then (unlawfully) purported to place conditions on her (an Internet ban and a residence requirement), both of which they in fact did not have the legal power to do, because Alison was not charged with anything and was merely “Released Under Investigation” [“RUI”].

Derbyshire’s poundland KGB released Alison late at night, without transport, no doubt deliberately.

The police should now release most suspects they need more time to investigate with a new status: released ‘under investigation’ or RUI for short. The police have no powers to require RUI suspects to report to them, no powers to place conditions on them and no time limits within which to complete their investigation against them.” [House of Commons Library] https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/insights/why-is-police-bail-being-reviewed-again/

The Derby police bail has been unlawfully extended well beyond the supposed “28 days plus 3 months” maximum anyway, and as for the case itself, it is a dead letter, because the 6-months time limit (applicable from when the prosecuting authority was aware of the complaint) has expired already, it seems. Despite that, Alison is still (notionally) on police bail!

In addition to the above, a halfwitted Jewish woman from North London (there is some doubt as to whether she is Jewish, in fact, but she claims to be, from what I have seen on Twitter) has made a complaint against Alison Chabloz on a charge of harassment.

By reason of that complaint (supposedly), a number of police from London and Kent (including some from the “anti-terror” department!) invaded Alison’s bedroom quite early one morning, handcuffed her (!), placed her under arrest and hauled her off to a police station where she was interrogated. It was even suggested (contrary to the spirit of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, aka PACE), that she might prefer to give an interview without a solicitor present! Disgraceful. Oh, and, once again, she was not charged with anything. Her telephone and computer were seized and have not been returned. That was on 22 May 2020.

Now, once again, Alison Chabloz is on police bail! A cat and mouse game which seems to be mainly designed to prevent her blogging.

Alison’s own blog: https://alisonchabloz.com/

The two subsisting complaints are probably never going to result in a charge. Alison scored a great victory when the CPS surrendered at Derby. That victory goes a long way to wiping out the CAA win in 2018.

Alison Chabloz is still here, still online, free of any court-imposed restriction, and known all over the world, largely because of the persecution she has suffered from the CAA and connected Jews. Indeed, her songs, such as (((Survivors))), can be found readily on the Internet, though not on YouTube, which removed her channel.

The Spectator: Toby Young writes…

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/were-facing-a-tsunami-of-censorship

All well and good, and well worth reading, but Young would be more credible had he defended —even with a single tweet— those of social-national views who have been pilloried in recent years for expressing them.

I start with myself

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/the-slide-of-the-english-bar-and-uk-society-continues-and-accelerates/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/when-i-was-a-victim-of-a-malicious-zionist-complaint/

London Forum

Then there was the targeted persecution of the London Forum, a place where interesting talks and lectures were given. In fact, I spoke there once myself, in 2017:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/02/08/my-visit-to-the-london-forum/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/09/24/my-talk-to-the-london-forum-in-2017/

Now the London Forum is defunct, the result of yet another Jewish lobby suppress-free-speech operation. Its YouTube channel has been closed down, and its guiding light, Jez Turner [Jeremy Bedford-Turner], was prosecuted after the malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” Jew-Zionist pressure group took the Crown Prosecution Service [“CPS”] to the High Court on a judicial review application. Jez Turner was later, in 2018, convicted at Southwark Crown Court by a supine jury, then sentenced by a harsh judge to a year in prison, of which he served half.

The main target was not Jez Turner, as such, but the London Forum. The underlying target? Free speech. (((They))) hate freedom of expression for white Northern Europeans.

[above: the Jewish-Zionist lobby in Parliament]

Kafka as the template for society?

Many of the brainwashed “antifascist” and multikulti “liberal” types are totally lacking in self-awareness. Look, for example, at the BBC News report below about Nailsea, North Somerset (commented on by the former UKIP leader, Batten):

https://twitter.com/GerardBattenUK/status/1278569775656992768?s=20

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-53246478

There’s more: the busybody who took pains to tear down those posters, one Shane Jones, is apparently a local resident. The BBC report continues:

[Shane Jones] said the the posters “must have been up for quite a while” which was “more shocking”. I would have thought someone else would have taken them down,” he said.” I thought this was a pretty open town.

Avon and Somerset Police said it believed the posters were put up overnight on Saturday. Supt Andy Bennett, said the force took “any reported hate crime with the utmost seriousness”.” It is inexplicable and unacceptable,” he said.

The Shane Jones person sees no conflict between saying that Nailsea was thought to be “a pretty open town” and his own tearing down of inoffensive posters because he himself disagrees with the content. In fact, I wonder what exactly he does oppose? Is he saying that it is not “OK to be white”?

Also, look at the policeman quoted, a Superintendent, no less. It’s our old “friend” Andy Bennett, the officer who refused to let his men prevent the toppling of the Edward Colston statue in Bristol recently.

[above: Superintendent Andy Bennett]

This (below) is also him…

“”I was on my electric pushbike. I cycled down to the area by St Augustine’s Parade. The statue was already down. People will say we allowed them to roll it all the way to the docks. What would have happened if we stopped people and arrested them? We would have had to guard the statue. If you’ve got a police cordon protecting a statue of a man who made his money trading slaves, you can imagine how different things might have been.”

Supt Bennett believes guarding the statue would likely have led to violence and vandalism.

Asked if he feared for officers’ safety, he replied: “Absolutely. People could have got hurt and things could have got damaged.

Our economy has been ravaged by coronavirus. Can you imagine those poor businesses if their windows had been broken in frustration? No one can afford that.

I was very mindful of what this could look like for the future tourist economy. All that was going through my mind.

I know it was the right thing to do for the safety of everyone there. No one got hurt and we had no arrests in the whole protest. That is 10,000 passionate people – Bristol should be proud of itself.” [Avon and Somerset News]

Well, even leaving aside the ludicrous picture of a senior police officer who gets around on an electric pushbike, like Mr. Bean or something, the idea of allowing a mob to do as it wishes simply because some of the untermenschen might “get hurt” is absurd, as is Superintendent Bean’s —I mean Bennett’s— view that it is a huge achievement not to have arrested any of the criminals. Is he in the right job?

[above: even a cartoon decrying mob groupthink shows the mob as white! Don’t mention the blacks!]

As for being afraid that the mob might break shop windows if thwarted, Superintendent Bean-Bennett might have considered it his job and his duty to call in backup and start shooting (at least baton rounds) and thus restore both law and order, and his force’s now degraded authority. Do that, rather than kneel in surrender to the mob, you muppet!

Dissidents have their platforms removed

Others have now found some of their online platforms removed: inter alia, Katie Hopkins, “Prison Planet” Watson, Nick Griffin, Tommy Robinson, David Icke etc. Not that I agree with all of them, but that is not the point.

At the same time, offline freedom is also less and less in evidence. We see well-known people such as David Icke now prevented from selling books; that applies even to “mainstream” figures such as Cambridge University historian David Starkey. The independent historian David Irving went that way long ago.

As for me, I was prevented a decade ago from publishing on Amazon Reviews, as a result of Jew complaints; despite the fact that I was voted a “top 50” reviewer (out of millions) by Amazon customers.

My Twitter account was removed in 2018, as a result of conspiracy between Jews and “antifa” nuisances. I am not on Facebook.

To close, a few cartoons:

Once the freedom of white Northern Europeans to write, speak, and post online has gone, what will be left? The sort of nonsensical trash spouted by System talking heads, “Black Lives Matter” dupes, “antifa” idiots?

Maybe, for a while, so long as it suits those who are really behind the “BLM” nonsense. So long as it suits the NWO, and ZOG. After that, the real motivation will slowly appear, and will be broadcast to the masses unable to think for themselves.

What about Alison Chabloz herself? Why are a few satirical songs heard, and seen performed, by few people (at first, before her ordeal started), so dangerous for ZOG and the New World Order?

It is a situation akin to the story of “The Emperor’s New Clothes“. It is akin to the fact that one small candle destroys the darkness.

The “holocaust” narrative is a vital building block of the NWO/ZOG attempt to control the world. The System is determined that no-one shall mock or question that narrative, and to that end has had built hundreds of “holocaust” shows and museums, from the Auschwitz camp (“reconstructed” after the end of the Second World War) to the “holocaust” monstrosities planted in the centre of almost every major city.

That has little to do with the details of what happened in a few small areas during the Second World War. It is all about controlling the historical narrative in order to control the peoples of Europe (especially) right now, and on into the future.

The planned “holocaust” “memorial” (hugely ugly visitor attraction) in London, to be plonked down right by the Palace of Westminster (!) was going to be rejected by the Westminster City Council, so the decision was taken out of their hands. Now it will be “considered” (approved) by that corrupt little pissant Robert Jenrick, a Conservative Friends of Israel member (as are all the Cabinet) who is not only married to a Jewish woman lawyer but who apparently celebrates Jewish holidays with her and their children.

The aim of all this is to build up an apparently irrefutable barrage of faked “evidence” in favour of that narrative. That is all a mirage, though, easily dissipated by satirical songs, or even by such as the Scotsman who taught his dog to salute in the manner of Hitler, then posted the result online. He too (Mark Meechan, aka “Count Dankula”) must also be hauled to court and sentenced, because he has, even if only by implication, or accidentally, mocked the Big Lie. Likewise more serious commentators such as David Irving and the very different David Icke.

Ironically, by persecuting Alison Chabloz, thousands, possibly millions, have heard her songs, which most of those people never would have encountered had it not been for the malicious campaign against her.

We must all stand up for freedom of expression on political, social, cultural, religious and historical topics.

Update, 19 July 2020

Note: the extract below is from the blog of Alison Chabloz, published in 2018. It identifies “Campaign Against Antisemitism” members Stephen Silverman (of Grays, Essex) and Stephen Applebaum (of Edgware, near Watford), both Zionist Jews, as sadistic online trolls who should both have been prosecuted for harassment. Silverman was later “invited” for police interview but had CAA lawyers draft letters delaying that interview; eventually Silverman managed to wriggle out of attending the police station and the matter is now apparently inactive.

Image

and some Jews on Twitter are still well behind the curve: this one, “@nathanjoseph198” (below), thinks that Alison Chabloz lost her appeal and went to prison. In fact, though she was initially convicted and she did go to a —reasonably comfortable— women’s prison for 2 days only, she was then released on bail pending appeal, which —in effect— she won, when the Crown Prosecution Service gave up and offered no evidence against her. See my article above.

https://twitter.com/nathanjoseph198/status/1284548343826448389?s=20

3 thoughts on “Free Speech—Alison Chabloz wins a victory but still faces attack”

  1. I certainly don’t agree with denial of the Shoah but do agree with Alison’s right to free speech. The plod scum vermin in England take exception to this. Land fit for heroes?

    Like

Leave a comment