Wikipedia is a useful resource if used with a sceptical attitude. For example, I saw this piece about one Anna Seghers, a Jewish woman who became a Communist Party member in Germany in 1928: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Seghers.
According to that article, Anna Seghers was “arrested by the Gestapo” in 1932. That would in fact have been impossible, if only because the Gestapo was established only in 1933, at which time it was a police organization purely in the region of Prussia, having been set up by Goering. It became a nationwide organization three or more years later, in and after 1936: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestapo.
Anna Seghers was from Mainz, in the Rhineland-Palatinate, and spent all or most of her life until 1934 in that region of Germany, mostly in Koblenz and Cologne. In other words, in the part of Germany where she lived, and when she lived there, there was no Gestapo.
It is possible that this Anna Seghers was questioned by local police, though not Gestapo, or even that she was briefly detained in 1933 or 1934 in Prussia (where there was a Gestapo), though that seems unlikely. Whatever the true facts, and even if she was arrested, she was then released. So she was not (as typical postwar propaganda would have it) brutalized, imprisoned, sent to a concentration camp, shot, “gassed” or her skull exhibited by SS-Ahnenerbe…
In fact, she went —and was allowed to go— to Switzerland in 1933 or 1934, and from there she went to Mexico.
“While still in Paris, in 1939, she had written The Seventh Cross, for which she received the Büchner-Prize in 1947. The novel is set in 1936 and describes the escape of seven prisoners from a concentration camp. It was published in the United States in 1942 and produced as a movie in 1944 by MGM starring Spencer Tracy. The Seventh Cross was one of the very few depictions of Nazi concentration camps, in either literature or the cinema, during World War II.” [Wikipedia]
So look at that above paragraph: The Seventh Cross was “one of the very few depictions of concentration camps” before 1945, yet that description is entirely fictional! Anna Seghers was never anywhere near a concentration camp or any kind of camp! In fact, she had left Germany in 1933 or 1934, i.e. before or within a few months of Hitler’s accession as Chancellor.
Reminiscent of the above is the 1993 film Schindler’s List, which many think of as “history”, whereas in fact it was based on a novel, Schindler’s Ark, written by an Australian who was only born in 1935, and whose novel (i.e. a work of fiction, which in fact won the Booker Prize for Historical Fiction) was published in 1983.
Naturally, a few real facts are woven into the fictional narrative. This is common to all “faction” writing (cf. The Day of the Jackal etc).
Another is the film Sophie’s Choice, which is completely fictional, but which many naive people cite as a “true story” and an example of the behaviour of the SS etc!
The “Working Class History” Twitter account weasels about Anna Seghers having “survived”, as if “the Gestapo” did terrible things to her instead of…nothing. The tweet there is very misleading, implying that Anna Seghers was detained for years, maybe until 1945!
The BBC is riddled with traitors, as are all msm outlets.
I should like to know how many people now listen to BBC Radio 4 shows such as PM or Broadcasting House? Few, I think.
A couple of “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”] Jew-Zionists discuss one of the women they and their friends used to troll mercilessly online (using pseudonymous Twitter accounts), a fact the lawyer for the “CAA” had to admit in open court during one of the court hearings in one of the Alison Chabloz cases.
They also made malicious complaint against people offline, ruining, for example, the (until-then successful) photography business of Jo Stowell. Now they still push a stick in on Twitter from time to time.
The odd thing about the above-noted remark by Applebaum is the contemptuous reference to the lady’s “failure in life“. A not uncommon remark by (((individuals))) like him, but does he ever look in the mirror? A former occasional/freelance scribbler, specializing in film, who has not had much published for quite a number of years (the occasional piece appears in the Jewish Chronicle). Applebaum is now, in effect, a 40-something house-husband. What right has he to look down on anybody?
Has Applebaum just explained, en passant, why he is so obsessive (about “anti-Semites”)?
“Priti Patel bullied staff” [news reports]. It is well-known that Indian women often bully their staff, eg household maids etc. That is even more true of those employers (or, in Sun-speak, “bosses”) brought up in modest circumstances (as Priti Patel was— her parents were small shopkeepers who built up a chain of profitable small shops). What surprises me is the surprise shown by all (in the msm etc).
Actually, exactly what do you have to do now to get permanently binned as a minister or Cabinet minister? Seems that bullying your staff is not enough. Neither is being corrupt, nor being an agent of Israel. Priti Patel has now achieved the hat-trick…yet there she sits on her huge rear end, still posing as Home Secretary. Jesus CHRIST!
Jan Morris, the writer, has died. As a travel writer, particularly, Jan Morris was unequalled, though “In an interview with BBC in 2016 she told Michael Palin that she does not like to be described as a travel writer, as her books are not about movement and journeys; they are about places and people.” [Wikipedia]; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Morris.
Not often that I find myself in agreement with “antifa” supporter, “Dr.” Louise Raw, but…
“Public sector pay freeze to pay for lockdown and furlough” [news reports]
Still want more “lockdown” (shutdown), and more facemask nonsense?
If so, don’t complain about the inevitable consequences…
Ah. MSM drones who never said a single word in defence of Alison Chabloz, Jez Turner, me, others, are finding out now that their own freedom of expression is disappearing because it is convenient for ZOG/NWO to repress it.
This is what the MPs who are members of Conservative Friends of Israel (80% of Con MPs) and Labour Friends of Israel (many, inc. Jess Phillips, Rachel Reeves, Yvette Cooper, Keir Starmer etc) are supporting. Dictatorial Jew-Zionist power both in the Middle East and also in Europe, including the UK.
Those who are or think that they are “Left” or “socialist” should simply call those they criticize what “they” really are, behind all the other “identities”… eventually, they must express themselves clearly as to the menace…
Jews are always very “brave” when in a group, or anonymous. When they are stood up too, though, they quickly change into the perennial Jewish “victim”. Not only in occupied Palesine, but also in occupied UK and elsewhere. Look at the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” criminals. Silverman (now at @ssilvuk) , Applebaum (now under @grubstreetsteve and also —in contravention of Twitter’s terms of service— at @rattus2384); Glasman, others…
They gleefully trolled non-Jews sadistically and frequently, using pseudonyms. They made malicious complaints to Twitter, Facebook, the police etc. When unmasked, and then exposed in open court (in the Alison Chabloz case), suddenly they are whining Jew “victims”, and demanding police protection. Very typical.
Whatever the immediate rights and wrongs, it is clear that the USA is heading towards a civil war situation somewhere down the line: racial, ethnic, demographic generally, socio-economic, cultural, ideological. Not clear cut, but with some red lines here and there.
The fact is that, while it is not a completely clear-cut situation, you can “buy justice” in the UK, in the sense that having an expensive legal team in a criminal or civil case does make it more likely that your side will win. Not always, but more often than not. In the Rebekah Brooks/Charlie Brooks case, the verdict was almost as clearly bought as if the judge and jury had been bought (which, to be clear, did not happen, though).
To say that Rebekah Brooks and her husband were “lucky” to be acquitted would be an understatement. A stunning success for the defence Counsel and solicitors; apparently, it all cost Murdoch £64M!
Most of these and similar job losses in the UK could have been avoided simply by having no “lockdown” (shutdown), by this government not scaring the population out of their collective skin about a condition that is killing maybe 1 person out of every 2,000 in the UK, by not imposing a toytown police state (eg the facemask nonsense), and so on. This is, largely, a government-caused recession and employment disaster.
“NOT ONE HEALTHY CHILD IN THE UK HAS DIED FROM CORONAVIRUS“
Slowly, very slowly, the truth emerges: “lockdown” was crazy. The toytown police state was legally invalid and carried out by Britain’s police in excess of their powers even disregarding the invalid “laws” supposedly authorizing those police actions. The facemask nonsense is a complete waste of time as well as being an attempt to control the population.
Almost all people who are healthy are not getting any serious complaints even if infected. Almost all people under 60 are not getting serious complaints even if infected. As testing discovers thousands of “new cases” per day, most show no symptoms; very few show symptoms beyond a sore throat or cough lasting a week or so, the hospital admission numbers are falling to almost zero, and the death rate is now at zero.
Look at Cruddas: too scared in the past to put himself forward seriously as a contender for the Labour leadership. His publications are a mish-mash of semi-Marxism and “Vatican 2” Roman Catholicism. He is a member of Labour Friends of Israel. Despite being a Roman Catholic, he is pro-abortion. Despite making vague anti-mass immigration noises, his contributions have been little more than hand-wringing bleating.
Cruddas lives with his wife [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Healy,_Baroness_Healy_of_Primrose_Hill] (a Labour Party drone now elevated to “baroness”) in Notting Hill; not a crime, but let’s just say that the couple have done “rather well” out of the Labour Party and the taxpayers…oh, and Cruddas was stupid enough to get caught (and convicted for) driving without MOT or insurance in 2012.
An encounter in Waitrose
“An encounter in Waitrose” sounds almost like “bloodshed at the Nell Gwynn Tea Rooms“, as mentioned by Basil Fawlty in Fawlty Towers. Not much of an incident, but it was telling all the same.
I went to pay at Waitrose, wearing my facemask, as mandated by Boris-idiot (without it, I should be unable to get past the dozy Handmaid’s Tale militia who now almost invariably loiter outside). I make sure that my nose is above the mask, both for convenience and to show at least restrained contempt for the facemask nonsense, the Government, and the scared rabbits who take it all terribly seriously.
So I go to pay, and the cashier (one I had not seen before, a fat woman in her forties, wearing a thick mask-muzzle) indicated to me that I should pull up my mask! The sheer presumption of it! Well, I did not want to have the sort of near-violent (if only from me!) altercation with a woman as I had had a few weeks ago with some Chinese student nuisance, so I made a gesture of touching the mask, and waved my hand as if to say “Thank you. Repeat F.O.”
The woman did not give up (a characteristic of the busybody type) and said “it’s to protect me“, to which (if I say so myself) I was too polite to counter with “I’m shopping, not screwing you“.
After that, I packed my shopping, paid, and left.
Instructive, because it proves how deep the fear propaganda has gone. That woman was herself both wearing a mask and largely behind a perspex screen!
It makes one realize that, under other circumstances, such a woman might well herd dissenters into a labour camp, or report to the Stasi. Whatever.
People thought that I was joking or being hyperbolic when saying that this most Jewish of “British” governments would be the most destructive. Now look…
Society, in its essence, is being eroded.
The people are afraid, many of them, of their own shadows, the retail sector based on shopping streets is on its knees, travel and tourism is on its knees (not because of “the virus” but because a stupid UK government keeps adding new countries to lists of those requiring quarantine (ineffective self-quarantine, at that).
Yesterday, a passenger supposedly infected with this virus (that only kills oneperson out of every two thousand persons in the UK) was dragged off a Ryanair flight at Luton or Stansted by a full team of goons wearing biohazard suits and helmets! This country really has gone ****ing mad.
Every day, we hear of large companies getting rid of hundreds, even thousands, of employees. Small shops are shutting by the thousand.
No-one is actually dying of (or even with) “the virus” now in the UK, and hospital admissions are falling daily, yet this government of clowns is keeping on keeping on…Reminiscent of the famous definition of insanity.
The economy is going to fall further. Added to that, we have the inability of this government of clowns to manage Brexit properly.
The next two or three years will present social-nationalism with its best opportunity since the 1930s. There must be a credible organization to lead it. By 2022-2023, the British people will be ready for something new. They will be desperate for something new. The door will lie open before us.
“While presenting an ITV News bulletin, she [Charlene White] refused to wear a Remembrance Day poppy, stating: “I prefer to be neutral and impartial on screen…” [Wikipedia]
As a country, Britain is mad to allow its enemies to occupy prominent positions in the msm. Also, according to Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom#Ethnic_groups], “blacks” of all kinds (disregarding those of recent mixed race) add up to only 3% of the population of the UK. Now when you look at TV presenters, are only 3% black? No. The proportion is far far higher. In advertisements on TV? No! Almost a majority! So against whom is the “racism”? And what (((group))) is behind most of all that? Not the blacks themselves, that’s for sure.
I have blogged previously about singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz, who was prosecuted (at first privately) by the malicious Jew-Zionist pressure group, “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”]. The Crown Prosecution Service [“CPS”] then took over her case and continued the prosecution, dropping some charges but substituting others:
In June 2018, Alison Chabloz was convicted in the “Westminster Mags”, amid allegations (never disproven; au contraire) of Jew-Zionist backstairs manipulations in the case. She was sentenced to a term of imprisonment (suspended), a financial penalty, hundreds of hours of unpaid work, a one-year social media ban (etc), all for having sung (and posted online) songs exposing a few of the hundreds of proven “holocaust” fakes and hoaxes!
Incidentally, Elie Wiesel was also a would-be terrorist: “In 1946, after learning of the Irgun‘s bombing of the King David Hotel, Wiesel made an unsuccessful attempt to join the underground Zionist movement.” [Wikipedia]
91 killed, 46-49 injured…
“Ninety-one people were killed, most of them being staff of the hotel or Secretariat: 21 were first-rank government officials; 49 were second-rank clerks, typists and messengers, junior members of the Secretariat, employees of the hotel and canteen workers; 13 were soldiers; 3 policemen; and 5 were members of the public. By nationality, there were 41 Arabs, 28 British citizens, 17 Jews, 2 Armenians, 1 Russian, 1 Greek and 1 Egyptian.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing
Jews such as Stephen Applebaum (a soi-disant “film critic” and proven Internet troll, who targeted women online), of the CAA pressure group, are even today defending that act of egregious terrorism, saying that “a warning was given”. Even if true, that does not excuse the Jew terrorists. The IRA used to “give warnings” shortly before their bloody outrages. Does that excuse them?
Alison Chabloz in fact has now won a victory on points, so to speak. Of the original sentence (which she appealed, unsuccessfully) the prison term (20 weeks) was suspended for 2 years, and has now expired; the unpaid work was refused after a few days, and the requirement for it was then removed by another magistrate; the social media bar was neatly sidestepped and ignored.
Alison Chabloz had not paid her pound of flesh, according to the cowardly sadists of the “CAA”, so they tried to punish her more by claiming that she had breached a condition of her original sentence by blogging on her WordPress blog.
At first, the privatized probation people and CPS refused to play ball, so the CAA pressure group applied political pressure via a dim Sikh who is the Police and Crime Commissioner for the beleagured Derbyshire Constabulary, and (more significantly) via venal David Gauke, a pro-Israel solicitor who was, at the time, Secretary of State for Justice (but who lost his seat and is now no longer an MP). Gauke got the Ministry of Justice to pressure the CPS and the probation organization. Alison was prosecuted for “breach of condition”, found guilty (ludicrously, on the facts) in a Derbyshire magistrates’ court, and sentenced to 8 weeks’ imprisonment! After two days, she was out on bail pending appeal.
In the event, the CPS was unwilling to disclose papers that would have proven political interference in the prosecution. The CPS therefore surrendered to Alison Chabloz by telling the Derby Crown Court that it would not be presenting any evidence. A face-saver. The CPS and CAA have been shamed and dismissed! The appeal hearing has already been taken out of the list. A victory for Alison Chabloz.
In fact, the CAA conspirators and other Jews have not entirely given up persecuting Alison Chabloz. Last summer (2019), Alison appeared on an Internet “radio” show. That gave Stephen Silverman, the Jew who calls himself “Head of Investigations and Enforcement” at the CAA, his opportunity to make yet another malicious complaint, this time to the police at Derby.
As a result, Alison Chabloz was yet again arrested and questioned by Derby police, who then (unlawfully) purported to place conditions on her (an Internet ban and a residence requirement), both of which they in fact did not have the legal power to do, because Alison was not charged with anything and was merely “Released Under Investigation” [“RUI”].
Derbyshire’s poundland KGB released Alison late at night, without transport, no doubt deliberately.
“The police should now release most suspects they need more time to investigate with a new status: released ‘under investigation’ or RUI for short. The police have no powers to require RUI suspects to report to them, no powers to place conditions on them and no time limits within which to complete their investigation against them.” [House of Commons Library] https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/insights/why-is-police-bail-being-reviewed-again/
The Derby police bail has been unlawfully extended well beyond the supposed “28 days plus 3 months” maximum anyway, and as for the case itself, it is a dead letter, because the 6-months time limit (applicable from when the prosecuting authority was aware of the complaint) has expired already, it seems. Despite that, Alison is still (notionally) on police bail!
In addition to the above, a halfwitted Jewish woman from North London (there is some doubt as to whether she is Jewish, in fact, but she claims to be, from what I have seen on Twitter) has made a complaint against Alison Chabloz on a charge of harassment.
By reason of that complaint (supposedly), a number of police from London and Kent (including some from the “anti-terror” department!) invaded Alison’s bedroom quite early one morning, handcuffed her (!), placed her under arrest and hauled her off to a police station where she was interrogated. It was even suggested (contrary to the spirit of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, aka PACE), that she might prefer to give an interview without a solicitor present! Disgraceful. Oh, and, once again, she was not charged with anything. Her telephone and computer were seized and have not been returned. That was on 22 May 2020.
Now, once again, Alison Chabloz is on police bail! A cat and mouse game which seems to be mainly designed to prevent her blogging.
The two subsisting complaints are probably never going to result in a charge. Alison scored a great victory when the CPS surrendered at Derby. That victory goes a long way to wiping out the CAA win in 2018.
Alison Chabloz is still here, still online, free of any court-imposed restriction, and known all over the world, largely because of the persecution she has suffered from the CAA and connected Jews. Indeed, her songs, such as (((Survivors))), can be found readily on the Internet, though not on YouTube, which removed her channel.
All well and good, and well worth reading, but Young would be more credible had he defended —even with a single tweet— those of social-national views who have been pilloried in recent years for expressing them.
Now the London Forum is defunct, the result of yet another Jewish lobby suppress-free-speech operation. Its YouTube channel has been closed down, and its guiding light, Jez Turner [Jeremy Bedford-Turner], was prosecuted after the malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” Jew-Zionist pressure group took the Crown Prosecution Service [“CPS”] to the High Court on a judicial review application. Jez Turner was later, in 2018, convicted at Southwark Crown Court by a supine jury, then sentenced by a harsh judge to a year in prison, of which he served half.
The main target was not Jez Turner, as such, but the London Forum. The underlying target? Free speech. (((They))) hate freedom of expression for white Northern Europeans.
Kafka as the template for society?
Many of the brainwashed “antifascist” and multikulti “liberal” types are totally lacking in self-awareness. Look, for example, at the BBC News report below about Nailsea, North Somerset (commented on by the former UKIP leader, Batten):
This is how fucked up our country now is. A bunch of Marxist revolutionaries parade under the banner Black Lives Matter & people fall on their knees in homage.
Someone says ‘It’s OK To Be White’ & its investigated by the police as a ‘hate crime’. FFS! https://t.co/HWipoUOyaz
There’s more: the busybody who took pains to tear down those posters, one Shane Jones, is apparently a local resident. The BBC report continues:
“[Shane Jones] said the the posters “must have been up for quite a while” which was “more shocking”. I would have thought someone else would have taken them down,” he said.” I thought this was a pretty open town.”
Avon and Somerset Police said it believed the posters were put up overnight on Saturday. Supt Andy Bennett, said the force took “any reported hate crime with the utmost seriousness”.” It is inexplicable and unacceptable,” he said.“
The Shane Jones person sees no conflict between saying that Nailsea was thought to be “a pretty open town” and his own tearing down of inoffensive posters because he himself disagrees with the content. In fact, I wonder what exactly he does oppose? Is he saying that it is not “OK to be white”?
Also, look at the policeman quoted, a Superintendent, no less. It’s our old “friend” Andy Bennett, the officer who refused to let his men prevent the toppling of the Edward Colston statue in Bristol recently.
This (below) is also him…
“”I was on my electric pushbike. I cycled down to the area by St Augustine’s Parade. The statue was already down. People will say we allowed them to roll it all the way to the docks. What would have happened if we stopped people and arrested them? We would have had to guard the statue. If you’ve got a police cordon protecting a statue of a man who made his money trading slaves, you can imagine how different things might have been.”
Supt Bennett believes guarding the statue would likely have led to violence and vandalism.
Asked if he feared for officers’ safety, he replied: “Absolutely. People could have got hurt and things could have got damaged.
“Our economy has been ravaged by coronavirus. Can you imagine those poor businesses if their windows had been broken in frustration? No one can afford that.
“I was very mindful of what this could look like for the future tourist economy. All that was going through my mind.
“I know it was the right thing to do for the safety of everyone there. No one got hurt and we had no arrests in the whole protest. That is 10,000 passionate people – Bristol should be proud of itself.” [Avon and Somerset News]
Well, even leaving aside the ludicrous picture of a senior police officer who gets around on an electric pushbike, like Mr. Bean or something, the idea of allowing a mob to do as it wishes simply because some of the untermenschen might “get hurt” is absurd, as is Superintendent Bean’s —I mean Bennett’s— view that it is a huge achievement not to have arrested any of the criminals. Is he in the right job?
As for being afraid that the mob might break shop windows if thwarted, Superintendent Bean-Bennett might have considered it his job and his duty to call in backup and start shooting (at least baton rounds) and thus restore both law and order, and his force’s now degraded authority. Do that, rather than kneel in surrender to the mob, you muppet!
Dissidents have their platforms removed
Others have now found some of their online platforms removed: inter alia, Katie Hopkins, “Prison Planet” Watson, Nick Griffin, Tommy Robinson, David Icke etc. Not that I agree with all of them, but that is not the point.
At the same time, offline freedom is also less and less in evidence. We see well-known people such as David Icke now prevented from selling books; that applies even to “mainstream” figures such as Cambridge University historian David Starkey. The independent historian David Irving went that way long ago.
As for me, I was prevented a decade ago from publishing on Amazon Reviews, as a result of Jew complaints; despite the fact that I was voted a “top 50” reviewer (out of millions) by Amazon customers.
My Twitter account was removed in 2018, as a result of conspiracy between Jews and “antifa” nuisances. I am not on Facebook.
To close, a few cartoons:
Once the freedom of white Northern Europeans to write, speak, and post online has gone, what will be left? The sort of nonsensical trash spouted by System talking heads, “Black Lives Matter” dupes, “antifa” idiots?
Maybe, for a while, so long as it suits those who are really behind the “BLM” nonsense. So long as it suits the NWO, and ZOG. After that, the real motivation will slowly appear, and will be broadcast to the masses unable to think for themselves.
What about Alison Chabloz herself? Why are a few satirical songs heard, and seen performed, by few people (at first, before her ordeal started), so dangerous for ZOG and the New World Order?
It is a situation akin to the story of “The Emperor’s New Clothes“. It is akin to the fact that one small candle destroys the darkness.
The “holocaust” narrative is a vital building block of the NWO/ZOG attempt to control the world. The System is determined that no-one shall mock or question that narrative, and to that end has had built hundreds of “holocaust” shows and museums, from the Auschwitz camp (“reconstructed” after the end of the Second World War) to the “holocaust” monstrosities planted in the centre of almost every major city.
That has little to do with the details of what happened in a few small areas during the Second World War. It is all about controlling the historical narrative in order to control the peoples of Europe (especially) right now, and on into the future.
The planned “holocaust” “memorial” (hugely ugly visitor attraction) in London, to be plonked down right by the Palace of Westminster (!) was going to be rejected by the Westminster City Council, so the decision was taken out of their hands. Now it will be “considered” (approved) by that corrupt little pissant Robert Jenrick, a Conservative Friends of Israel member (as are all the Cabinet) who is not only married to a Jewish woman lawyer but who apparently celebrates Jewish holidays with her and their children.
The aim of all this is to build up an apparently irrefutable barrage of faked “evidence” in favour of that narrative. That is all a mirage, though, easily dissipated by satirical songs, or even by such as the Scotsman who taught his dog to salute in the manner of Hitler, then posted the result online. He too (Mark Meechan, aka “Count Dankula”) must also be hauled to court and sentenced, because he has, even if only by implication, or accidentally, mocked the Big Lie. Likewise more serious commentators such as David Irving and the very different David Icke.
Ironically, by persecuting Alison Chabloz, thousands, possibly millions, have heard her songs, which most of those people never would have encountered had it not been for the malicious campaign against her.
We must all stand up for freedom of expression on political, social, cultural, religious and historical topics.
Update, 19 July 2020
Note: the extract below is from the blog of Alison Chabloz, published in 2018. It identifies “Campaign Against Antisemitism” members Stephen Silverman (of Grays, Essex) and Stephen Applebaum (of Edgware, near Watford), both Zionist Jews, as sadistic online trolls who should both have been prosecuted for harassment. Silverman was later “invited” for police interview but had CAA lawyers draft letters delaying that interview; eventually Silverman managed to wriggle out of attending the police station and the matter is now apparently inactive.
and some Jews on Twitter are still well behind the curve: this one, “@nathanjoseph198” (below), thinks that Alison Chabloz lost her appeal and went to prison. In fact, though she was initially convicted and she did go to a —reasonably comfortable— women’s prison for 2 days only, she was then released on bail pending appeal, which —in effect— she won, when the Crown Prosecution Service gave up and offered no evidence against her. See my article above.
I’m still hoping that Chabloz failing her appeal & going to prison will draw a line in the sand. There has got to be a compelling reason to stop these racists
This video is not merely about vaccination (nb. I myself am not an “anti-vaxxer”, by any means), but about large-scale transnational changes taking place around us.
A few basic thoughts I have had over the years about a possible “33-year cycle”
1923: seeds of WW2, as in Italy…the March on Rome (late Oct. 1922) and Mussolini asked to become Prime Minister (October/November 1922); the invasion of Corfu (1923) ; Russian Empire becomes the Soviet Union on 30 December 1922; in Germany, the Beer Hall Putsch of November 1923; hyperinflation across Germany (1923, though inflation in Germany had been increasing from 1921).
1956: Suez Crisis, when Israel joined with UK and France against Nasser; this was the start of the Arab/West conflict in the modern era; Khrushchev’s Secret Speech denouncing Stalinism (in which he was himself one of the worst offenders), leading to the Thaw, and eventually (not in a straight line) the total collapse of Sovietism; also, the first big rebellion of the satellites, the 1956 Hungarian Uprising; final end of WW2 rationing in the UK and start of consumerist UK in 1955-56; [and my own birth];
1989: the fall of all kinds of socialism and even social democracy worldwide, inc. effective fall of the Soviet Union (officially 1991), fall of Berlin Wall, Chinese transition to full capitalism behind “Communist” facade; Cuba becomes effectively private enterprise after 1989; also, the NWO/Israeli attack on the powerful states of the Arab world starts in Iraq; in the UK, the end of Thatcher’s rule leads to Labour Party abandonment of “socialism” even in its party constitution;
Also, George Bush snr. proclaims the NWO openly in early 1990;
2022: [personal note: I shall be 66 on 2 September 2022]
It will be noted that these years also link themes: 20thC socialism, the Arab/Muslim v. “West” situation etc.
Let’s start with a typical Twitter conformist, tweeting typically —and typically meaninglessly (the police who ride around in jeeps and cruise up and down empty motorways, or fly drones over national parks, are of course not “putting their lives on the line”):
One third of Britons:
‘All these fucking police, putting THEIR LIVES on the line, trying to save OUR LIVES all the time.
They’ve gone too far!
Let’s all go to the beach and be ravished by this highly infectious, fatal disease. Let’s spread it to our selfless NHS workers too!’ https://t.co/g0RIQSCAnL
I just noticed that this odd-looking creature has no less than 551,000 Twitter followers. She must be one of the ever-growing mob of “celebrities” and the temporarily famous.
Ah, God bless Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Spraggan Seems that she is a lesbian singer who nearly won the TV talent contest, X Factor, in 2012. I myself had never heard of her, but that is not her fault; pop singers and talent shows are not my milieu.
So what other tweets are being sent out today?
“The theory of lockdown, after all, is pretty niche, deeply illiberal — and, until now, untested. It’s not Sweden that’s conducting a mass experiment. It’s everyone else.” Precisely. https://t.co/kSvU6oZgTH
Sweden has not had a “lockdown” so far, and it looks as if it will not have one. It has also, as far as I know, not had a Swedish equivalent of Britain’s “clap for the NHS” either. Not that most nurses and doctors (etc) in the NHS do not “deserve” a clap (and a decent pay rise) for their valuable work, but for the virtue-signallers of Twitter what seems to matter is the almost enforced “me-too-ism” (cf. Poppy Day and its surrounds).
'The social-isolation advocates frantically grasp at straws to support shutting down the world. It bothers them that there is one country in the world that hasn’t shut down and that hasn’t socially isolated its population.' https://t.co/kSvU6oZgTH
The government had *no* idea what it was committing itself to when it launched this scheme. I cannot see how the economy can survive unlimited spending on this scale. Like throwing new schools and hospitals into the sea. And for what? https://t.co/Y8vzXDUhMT
Hitchens is of course right here. The economy of the UK, of the EU, of much of the world, cannot in fact be shut down indefinitely without almost everyone in this country starving to death eventually. A “lockdown” must of necessity be temporary. The first question is “how temporary?”
Peter Hitchens input is r.important cos the idea that what we are doing has no costs in terms of public health or public services, is just wrong. As usual, our pundits arent grown up about enuf to have sensible convo over the trade offs. Hes one of few prepared to articulate them https://t.co/Dbah8ia3ZO
I have diabetes with kidney pain and leg cramps. I've been exercising regularly at a gym which alleviates the pain and the condition. Yesterday I was forbidden from this essential exercise by two police officers using a loud haler.
The problem with comparing the Coronavirus situation in the UK to that obtaining in USA, Sweden, Italy, China etc is that
every country has different demographics, lifestyles, transport, health services etc;
every country is collecting statistics differently (e.g. as to what is a “Coronavirus” death in the first place): to take a reductio ad absurdum example, if someone has flu and Coronavirus, is his/her death from Coronavirus or simply with Coronavirus? What about if someone has Coronavirus, feels unwell and, perhaps even as a result, crashes his/her car and dies?;
every country has a different level of testing in place. Some test only those in hospital, some test medical staff, some (e.g. the UK until now at least) test hardly anyone.
The result is that, in looking at “the statistics”, we are comparing apples and oranges.
Well given that 90% of the population live in a third of the land mass (Stockholm county alone has 2.4 million of the 4 million inhabitants of Götaland Region) and the fact they’re socialising as normal and were not, you might want to reconsider that.
But @leamwick the idiocy of the shutdown is not apparent to the Cabinet or the majority of the media, who continue to act as if 'There is No Alternative', the dim watchword of the person who knows very well that there is an alternative – but does not want you to consider it. https://t.co/lLOasXhZfz
First of all we had all the “race relations”, “community relations” etc laws, then came the crackdown on other freedoms, including Internet freedoms, mostly at the behest of the Jewish lobby. Now the System is experimenting to see how far can it go in restricting quite ordinary daily activity, such as a motorcyclist going for a spin, or a family walking across the Derbyshire moors. The Coronavirus is being used as a fine cover story for a dry run for total System tyranny (though the Coronavirus situation iself is bad enough, of course). The mass media have ceased even to try to question government policy (as was also seen throughout the 2010-2019 “austerity” repression. Same now:
The Underground travellers (who probably have little choice) being blamed, impliedly, for crowding the trains, when, as we have seen, the trains are crowded because people like NHS staff still need to travel, and because that hopeless little Pakistani, Sadiq Khan, reduced the number of trains being run.
Dictatorships and tyrannies have had sycophant newspapers for a couple of hundred years, radio since about 1920, TV stations since (for this purpose) the 1950s. A new element is the online mob, particularly on Twitter; happy to be slaves of the System if they can hate the targeted dissenters.
In view of the fact that North West London is a major “hotspot” for Coronavirus, as are parts of Paris and certain urban parts of Israel, it might be more accurate to say that the spread of this virus comes not from “antisemitism” but from a quite different direction…
“Always look on the bright side of Life”…
Karma is a wonderful things folks.Last week the editor of Jewish Chronicle the odious Stephen Pollard was part of a vile co-ordinated attack on me, designed to cause me & family great distress. Today we learn the paper he edits is being liquidated. https://t.co/7WEcRiAGQ4
Only last week @StephenPollard the utterly odious editor of the Jewish Chronicle was part of a vile co-ordinated attack on me clearly designed to do me reputational harm & cause me and my family great distress during a pandemic. This is a seven-day karma. https://t.co/nAXopclKMX
Good riddance to the Jewish Chronicle, a vile publication who has a very nasty editor Stephen Pollard, who also writes for the Daily Express, Daily Mail, Sun, Telegraph et al – in other words another of Murdoch's henchmen
Toxic media deserves to go down the pan, where it belongs
— BJ is not my PM, I've never voted Tory 🙂 (@Tinkerbell32112) April 8, 2020
Another rag out of business that cant spout drivel anymore lol. Keep up the shit work gnasher
Imagine if I hit the Euromillions and put in to the administrators or eventual liquidators the only bid for whatever is left of the Jewish Chronicle! Ha ha! I wonder what I could put on the front page once I become the new proprietor? Something historical?
I could even have a section devoted to historical revision. Alison Chabloz writes nicely…
Maybe Pollard would agree to stay on as Editor (under suitable supervision and control, of course…), if I were to make him an offer he would be unable to refuse…
I just thought of another good aspect to the Jewish Chronicle closing down: Stephen Applebaum, Twitter troll (who secretly, using pseudonyms, trolled quite a few anti-Zionists, mostly women, with equally horrible Stephen Silverman and other “Campaign Against Antisemitism” bastards), will now find it even harder to pose as a soi-disant “film critic”. As far as I know, the Jewish Chronicle has been the only newspaper to print his occasional reviews for years.
I have been freelancing for @JewishChron since 1997 and greatly enjoyed the opportunities to write about fascinating people and subject matter. I hope for the sake of the title, its staff & freelancers, a way to help the title survive can be found. For now, though, it's a sad day https://t.co/onRnEfxQ0r
(“@grubstreetsteve” is his present personal Twitter account, along with “@rattus2384”).
It even looks like Pollard! But if the cap fits, Applebaum too…
Quite a few Jew scribblers —including several connected with the Jewish Chronicle—enjoyed my being disbarred in 2016 (no doubt in ignorance of the fact that I had in any case ceased active Bar practice in 2007-2008). Not all will now lose their jobs, livelihoods, maybe even houses and flats, but some will. As for the rest, their time will come.
Ha ha! Just what I needed on a day like this (a boring day, and me living under a “Conservative” pseudo-communitarian ZOG semi-dictatorship)! A boost like no other! I begin to see, in minor key, why people always said that Saddam Hussein was never so happy as when his enemies were being killed off! Well, some of mine are not being killed off, just losing jobs etc, but in times like these, one must take one’s pleasures where one can.
I still like the idea of winning the Euromillions jackpot and then buying the rump of the Jewish Chronicle! I could staff it with anti-Zionist Jews, the ones the Zionist Jews hate: Gilad Atzmon could do the show business stuff, while the commentator-at-large might be…hm, let’s see…Mira bar Hillel!
Coronavirus view from Israel
“Israeli virologist urges world leaders to calm public, slams ‘unnecessary panic’
‘People think this virus is going to attack them all, and then they’re all going to die,’ says Prof. Jihad Bishara. ‘Not at all. In fact, most of those infected won’t even know it’”
“A leading Israeli virologist on Sunday urged world leaders to calm their citizens about the coronavirus pandemic, saying people were being whipped into unnecessary panic.
Prof. Jihad Bishara, the director of the Infectious Disease Unit at Petah Tikva’s Beilinson Hospital, said that some of the steps being taken in Israel and abroad were very important, but the virus is not airborne, most people who are infected will recover without even knowing they were sick, the at-risk groups are now known, and the global panic is unnecessary and exaggerated.
That’s not the way it is at all. It’s not in the air. Not everyone [who is infected] dies; most of them will get better and won’t even know they were sick, or will have a bit of mucus.”
But in Israel and around the world, “everybody is whipping everybody else up into panic — the leaders, via the media, and the wider public — who then in turn start to stress out the leaders. We’ve entered some kind of vicious cycle.”
He urged the public to internalize that “we’re talking about a virus that is not airborne. Infection is via droplet transmission… Only if you are close to someone who has the virus, and you get the saliva when he sneezes or coughs, can you get ill. And if you don’t then maintain personal hygiene,” primarily by washing hands.
Referring to Italy’s national lockdown, he said that “quarantine is an effective precaution, but there has to be temperate use. You can shut down a whole country, but there are other means.”
At this stage, he said, “we know how the virus behaves, how it spreads, and which groups are in danger. We know now that his virus is primarily dangerous to old people, and to people with a history of chronic disease, and those who are immunocompromised.””
[The Times of Israel]
By the way, if anyone is surprised that I quote an Israeli in my blog, my response is “why not?”
If I want a great performance of Rachmaninov, I might turn to Vladimir Ashkenazi, if I want one of J.S. Bach, I might choose Evgeny Kissin; if Chopin, Emanuel Ax…
Pugachev is in fact a slightly unusual Russian gangster-businessman, in that he really is Russian (not Jew or whatever). Looks like a “tough guy”, but if the question is whether to bet on a exiled tough guy or the Russian state, I know where my money is going…
Oddly enough, I once met the father of Alexandra Tolstoy, who is the interesting writer Nikolai Tolstoy, a former cavalry officer of the British Army [perhaps so only briefly; Wikipedia says nothing of it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Tolstoy]. I was introduced to him in 1981 or 1982 (I think 82) at the Russian Refugees jumble sale at Chelsea Old Town Hall in the King’s Road (the sale is or was a Russian New Year tradition going back to the Russian Revolution(s) and Civil War, when many anti-Bolshevik Russians came to the UK penniless).
A friend of mine flew to Switzerland with Nikolai Tolstoy not long before that, in order to help with information for his book, Stalin’s Secret War. That would have been 1980 or 1981.
As for my impression of the lady in the documentary, perhaps I should not say, but after all she did volunteer to be judged by the TV public…Well, to me she seems as thick as two short planks, for one thing. As to why she divorced her first husband and married Pugachev, I think that a good deal of the answer, probably 90% or 80%, was his wealth, at a mere guess. She has dead eyes.
As for her being too bored in France, it is clear that, for her, the world revolves around London, Harrods, Harvey Nicholl’s and her no doubt equally empty-headed friends. Her children too, of course…
Alexandra Tolstoy seems to want us to feel sorry for her, though she could well have simply continued to live in a beautiful belle epoque place on the Cote d’Azur, with her children, and her husband (and his guard force). I have seen too many people really suffering in the UK and elsewhere (including the former Soviet Union) from lack of quite modest funds to feel sorry for a woman who has a “cottage” (actually a quite decent modest house) in middle England, not to mention her parents’ place, a nice house in a pleasant part of Oxfordshire with an outside swimming pool (the pool was not shown in the documentary).
I certainly do not believe that she is in any danger at all from Putin or the Russian state. If she herself felt in danger, she would not now be once again running tours to the former Soviet republics in Central Asia, and herself visiting those republics.
Pugachev? He may be in more danger. There are warrrants out for him in Russia, and if he sets foot in the UK, a warrant for his committal to prison (for 2 years) for contempt of a High Court order. If the Russians get him, though, he may end up, like his 18th Century namesake, in a cage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pugachev%27s_Rebellion#Defeat
I have never been there. I doubt that I would like it much.
I have lived in a number of countries in my life, from my own land, the UK (much of my life from 1956 to 2020); Australia (<3 years aged 10-13 in the late 1960s); USA (about 2 years within the years 1989-1993 in New Jersey and New York City, and then, much later, shorter business and personal trips to South Carolina and Florida); France (4 years but commuting every couple of weeks to the UK); Kazakhstan (one year, 1996-1997); Rhodesia (part of 1977); Turkey (a few months), Egypt (a few months), the Eastern Caribbean (a few months). Shorter visits and holidays etc have been many and varied, from Moscow to Cayman, Liechtenstein to Alderney, Tunisia to Poland (where I spent a total of, probably, about 3 months in the late 1980s), North Cyprus to Qatar, among many others.
Now? I am too European —and maybe too advanced in years now— to live in countries controlled by non-Europeans (and to tolerate their dirt and disorganization).
Well, seems that those who said that the thick princeling would end up being taken to Hollywood were not wide of the mark…
That pair have become mere “celebrities” in a milieu where it sometimes seems that everyone and his dog is a “celebrity”. Even the Jew-Zionist lawyer, Mark Lewis, and his “she-once-read-Sky-News” second wife (the marriage lasted nearly a year) were posing as “celebrities” about 6 years ago. Now Caroline Feraday is a single mother (no, not Lewis, apparently), and is living in a small house in an obscure Californian suburb, and working in an office, while Lewis himself, now living in Israel, was found to have sent a number of people obscene or offensive messages while, it was said in his defence (!), almost doolally on prescription drugs. Censured and fined by the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal in 2018, he was let off a heavier fine because having been, in effect, sacked by his law firm, the Tribunal heard that his only assets were his vulgar clothes, a pension worth £70 a week and a mobility scooter! Even his car was provided by the DWP, via the Motability scheme! The “top libel lawyer”…
Beware the “celebrities”…
A couple of things today re. uncultured loudmouth Jess Phillips, who thinks that she could be a prime minister! In the American vernacular, JESUS H. CHRIST!
Jess Phillips is a real freeloader even compared to most MPs:
Jess Phillips claimed £207,157 in expenses in 2018. Of this £157,490 was spent on staffing (her husband works for her). Another £24,269 was claimed for office costs, £21,696 for accommodation and £3,626 for travel. She claimed £48k more than anyone else! For doing what??
The other thing is that I have still not been able to prove that Jess Phillips is maybe part-Jew or has some familial Jewish connection, which I have long suspected; but I notice that the Twitter Jew-Zionist cabal seem to favour her and, only today, I saw some System talking head tweeting about how it was “antisemitic” to oppose Jess Phillips. “The shark can scent blood a mile away when he is hungry…” [Control in The Spy Who Came In From The Cold]
Ha ha! Oh, yes, the voters of Redcar voted to support the Jews! That’s plausible (not)…
Anna Turley was known as completely pro-Israel etc, so why did the Redcar voters not support her and vote for her and so, via her, the Jews? (though I concede that it may just be that the Redcar electorate is composed of badly-educated plebs easily fooled by the Sun “newspaper”. I have never been there, so cannot say).
Still, good riddance!
I have blogged about this before, but it has now gone way beyond a joke when almost every single TV ad has to have a mixed-race couple (usually black man with white and often blonde woman) and usually mixed-race offspring. In fact, the situation now is worse even than it was when I blogged about that. It’s plainly a conspiracy, a kind of social engineering aimed at children and the young generally. Normalizing such liaisons.
Many readers of this blog will have read of my experiences with the malicious and extreme Jew-Zionist organizations, “UK Lawyers for Israel” (UKLFI) and “Campaign Against AntiSemitism” (CAA), the memberships of which overlap in part. For example, the abusive Jew-Zionist solicitor Mark Lewis, who has now fled to Israel, is a leading member of both.
I dare say that many ordinary people on, for example, Twitter, have no idea that sometimes, when they see a veritable tweetstorm or at least tweetsquall —such as that backing Lewis during his recent Disciplinary Tribunal hearing (he was found guilty anyway)—, they are actually reading tweets which are part of a barrage put out and/or at least loosely coordinated by those two groupings. Below, two blog articles which reported on my experience of these organizations:
The CAA Pressured the DPP/CPS to Prosecute Jez Turner and Alison Chabloz
1. Jez Turner
In 2015, Jez Turner (Jeremy Bedford-Turner) of the London Forum made a speech in the street, in Whitehall, London. One sentence mentioned the Jews, in such manner as that they should be removed from the UK. The CAA, which had agents at the scene, reported Jez Turner to the police there and thereafter. Eventually, the Crown Prosecution Service [CPS] considered whether any offence of incitement might have been both committed and as to whether any prosecution was a. likely to result in conviction, and b. in the public interest. The CPS decided not to prosecute. Note that a prosecution under [the relevant part of the] Public Order Act 1986 requires the assent of the Attorney-General. In other words, Jez Turner could not have been prosecuted privately by the CAA for the alleged offence.
The CAA made application to the High Court for a judicial review of the no-prosecution decision made by the CPS. The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), as head of the CPS, was the Respondent. On the eve of the relevant hearing in 2017, the DPP/CPS agreed to look again at their decision, thus avoiding a defeat but at the same time giving in to the demand of the CAA. After some time, the CPS announced that Jez Turner would now be prosecuted. He was, in 2018, in the Crown Court, no less than three years after he made his speech. He was, arguably, unlucky in his jury and possibly (I was not personally present) in his judge. He was given a full year in prison, of which half would actually be spent incarcerated (he was recently released). All for making a humorous speech in which one sentence said that the Jews should be (again) expelled from England.
2. Alison Chabloz
In the case of Alison Chabloz, who sang satirical songs, some of which mocked the Jew-Zionists, she was accused of having breached the (“bad law”) Communications Act 2003, s.127, in having, allegedly, posted online the said songs. The CPS refused to prosecute her or, rather, did not; with the time-limit of 6 months looming, the CAA took a private prosecution. Leaving aside the legal and technical argument on the merits, the CPS had the right to take over the case and, if it did, to drop it or to continue it. The CPS decided to take over the prosecution and continue with it (though it in fact substituted other charges for the original ones…). The offence is summary only. Alison Chabloz was convicted at trial in 2018 and given a sentence of (depending on how it is read) a total of 12-20 weeks’ imprisonment, suspended for 2 years, plus community service “serf labour”, a financial penalty of £700, and a 1 year ban on use of “social media”. Note, however, that Alison Chabloz is appealing both conviction and sentence.
3. Nazim Hussain Ali
Mr. Ali led and spoke at an anti-Israel rally in London. The CAA individuals hung around, in their usual fashion, tried to catch Mr. Ali saying something or other, then (as in the other cases mentioned here) reported him to the police. The CPS refused to prosecute and so the CAA took a private prosecution. The CPS took over that prosecution and discontinued it. The CAA then wanted to have that decision judicially reviewed. It was. They lost.
The judgment is worth reading in full, but the most relevant parts are:
“The DPP took the view that, in all the circumstances, the words used were not “abusive” within the meaning of that provision, so that a prosecution was more likely than not to fail.”
“As the [legal precedent] authorities stress, article 10 [of the European Convention on Human Rights] does not permit the proscription or other restriction of words and behaviour simply because they distress some people, or because they are provocative, distasteful, insulting or offensive.”
“this is a public law challenge, and this court can only intervene if the decision to take over the CAA’s private prosecution and discontinue it made by the Decision-Maker was irrational, i.e. a decision to which no properly directed and informed CPS decision-maker could have come. In my judgment, it cannot be said that it was irrational.”
This was a big hit against the CAA. The CAA is an organization which for years has been making inflated claims, both in its own name and via sometimes pseudonymous and abusive Twitter (and other) accounts run by its leading members, notably Stephen Silverman (who styles himself “Head of Investigations and Enforcement”!).
Under its own name and under the real names of its leading members, but also under other account names, the CAA has for 4-5 years been threatening not only “anti-Semites” and “holocaust” “deniers” (historical revisionists), but anti-Zionist dissidents in general with unspecified police and other action, also sending, from pseudonymous Twitter accounts (etc) threatening and harassing tweets (etc) to and/or about individuals. Some people were constantly taunted online and even offline with threats about knocks on the doors of houses, arrests, prosecutions, trials, terms of imprisonment. Almost all figments of the sick imaginations of the CAA members in question.
Women in particular were targeted by a number of online social media accounts controlled by various CAA persons, and in particular by Stephen Silverman of Essex and his associate, one-time/sometime “film critic” Stephen Applebaum, of North London. The pair have been somewhat muzzled of late —having been exposed and had their real names etc exposed— and now mainly tweet (slightly less overtly venomously) as @ssilvuk and @rattus2384).
Another leading Jew-Zionist (at least in his own estimation) is one Gideon Falter, who apparently graduated from Warwick University in law, though if so did not carry through to becoming a solicitor or barrister. Falter, Chairman of the CAA, seems to have family money (his parents are said to own a house in a well-known street in St. John’s Wood, London where houses sell for anything up to £40 Million). He seems to spend most of his time on CAA or other Zionist activities. I suppose that that is one way in which, he may imagine, he validates his existence.
Falter has given evidence in several cases, but his evidence has not always been accepted as veracious. In the case of Rowan Laxton, in 2009, which therefore preceded the establishment of the CAA by 5 years, Falter gave evidence which, while accepted by the magistrates, was (at least impliedly) not accepted by the Crown Court judge at the appeal (rehearing), at which hearing Laxton was successful. He was fully reinstated at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and is now H.M. High Commissioner in Cameroon: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/rowan-james-laxton–2
Laxton’s career success must be bitter for Falter, who has also had his testimony in other “anti-Semitism” cases strongly challenged…
Over the 4+ years since its foundation, the CAA has not been very successful. It has attempted to bring to trial (either by privately prosecuting people, or by making malicious allegations about them to the police and/or professional bodies) quite a large number of potential defendants. Most have either not been prosecuted or have been acquitted, or have been successful on appeal. A few people have been prosecuted for saying or writing rude things (quite likely justified anyway) about individual Jews (I noticed a few cases about landlords and property developers etc…). Most of those cases resulted in fines being handed down, by local magistrates, in the order of £50 or £100. Rather petty.
The larger scalps taken by the CAA are few, even if one includes the handful of successes by the UKLFI group: Jez Turner (now released after having spent 6 months in prison), Alison Chabloz (who is appealing now), a few minor harassment cases. The CAA failed to get the CPS to prosecute me for tweeting truth, and was too frightened to try to prosecute me privately, though UKLFI did get me disbarred in 2016 (8-9 years after I had anyway ceased Bar practice!).
The CAA has been —and I believe still is— under investigation both by the police and by the responsible officers of the Charity Commission. It has been criticized extensively by the more “Establishment” part of the Jewish power structure in England, including the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Jewish Chronicle. It recently suffered a considerable blow when one of its most active members, Mark Lewis, the venomous Jew-Zionist solicitor, fled to Israel after the conclusion of the Disciplinary Tribunal case brought against him by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority.
The finances of the CAA “charity” are opaque. I suspect (educated guess) that two particular Jew millionaires, indeed billionaires, have contributed to the CAA, and for them a few tens of thousands of pounds a year is a bagatelle. However, even the ultra-wealthy are probably unwilling to give much to an organization which consistently manifests failure.
I should love to know how many Jews are members of the CAA (are any of its members non-Jews? Maybe there are a few doormats here or there). My guess would be hundreds rather than thousands. It has appealed for donations, run pledge drives etc, and recently tweeted to recruit a half-time-working “communications” person at a salary of £12,500-£15,000 a year. Hardly sumptuous. The CAA Twitter account was inactive from 20 December 2018 until 11 January 2019.
I have no idea what, if any, costs will be payable by the CAA in relation to the latest defeat in court, but I hope that they will be substantial.
The latest defeat by the CAA, and Mark Lewis’s flight to Israel (where he has said, repeatedly, on radio and TV, that Jews should all leave Europe), must mark the beginning of the end for the abusive and fake CAA “charity”.
Objectively speaking, it may be that the CAA has done much to stimulate “anti-Semitism” in the UK…
Good luck to Alison Chabloz in her upcoming appeal!
Below, a very recent tweet thread in which Stephen Applebaum of the CAA, under his most recent pseudonym, @rattus2384, and with other Jews, attacks the father of a 16 year old girl allegedly targeted by yet another Zionist. [click for full thread]
When your 16 year old daughter – and yes, she is 16 – is subjected to vile, abusive, and intimidating tweets, by so-called celebs, and when one of those "celebs" attempts to get her to meet in London, you tend to find the time to monitor, record, and collate said info.
The CAA’s sting seems to have been largely drawn. The CAA Twitter account has tweeted only once (on 11 January 2019) since 20 December 2018. Gideon Falter has not tweeted since 5 September 2018 (except for two retweets, on 6 November 2018 and 7 December 2018). Both Silverman and Applebaum/Rattus have been somewhat muzzled of late. Now that they have been fully unmasked and exposed, they have evidently decided that they have to be more circumspect online. The CAA star is fast-waning.
Update, 18 July 2019
Well, like the cockroach, the CAA is still embedded…Having failed to have a Palestinian activist resident in the UK prosecuted [see above], the CAA Jew-Zionists try to get him another way, by having his professional regulator (he is a pharmacist) “investigate” his political life and then perhaps haul him before a disciplinary tribunal. This is what “they”, meaning (((they))) do…(for my own experiences, see below the CAA tweet…)
“Al Quds Day” leader Nazim Ali, who blamed “Zionists” for Grenfell Tower tragedy to face regulatory investigation following complaint by CAAhttps://t.co/vJRAm5s8xz
The UK professions now all have new, or fairly new, “Codes of Conduct” for the members of whatever profession is being “regulated”. These have been drafted by “Zionist” lawyers in almost all cases. Should the individual member of a profession be anti-Zionist, lo and behold, (((they))) make “complaint” about the “hate speech” or whatever that the individual is said to have uttered. A covert Zionist takeover, and an attempt to control the private and political life of the people affected.
Where “they” are, there can be no real freedom.
Update, 5 November 2020
The “Campaign Against Antisemitism” prevailed on the General Pharmaceutical Council to “prosecute” Nazim Ali. “Lawfare” misusing the professional regulations. Nazim Ali might have lost his shop, business, profession, decades of work, all because a pack of Jew extremists pretended to be “offended”.
As it was, the disciplinary case against Nazim Ali was heard mostly in the first week of November 2020. The result, given on 5 November 2020, was that the tribunal held that what Nazim Ali said in 2017 was not “antisemitic” but that it had been “offensive”. He was given an official (quasi-judicial) warning.
Ha ha! The CAA Jews thought that they were going to at least ruin and bankrupt Nazim Ali now that the police and CPS were not going to charge him with anything criminal. Instead, he was just given a warning.
Max Hill Q.C. is on the brink of taking up his role as D.P.P., in succession to Alison Saunders. It is too early to say what his official attitude will be in relation to political “crime”, “thought crime” and freedom of expression. While he has made some quite liberal remarks in the past in connection with Muslims, Islamists etc, he has also referred to “far right fanatics”, a meaningless phrase which is often used by Zionists and their msm doormats to label social nationalists and others.
Already, the unpleasant Zionist fanatics of the so-called “Campaign Against AntiSemitism” or “CAA” (themselves under police investigation for stalking, harassment and abuse of charitable status) have taken to Twitter etc in an attempt to put pressure on the new DPP. They want him to prosecute anyone criticizing Zionist individuals and groups under the UK’s draconian laws against so-called “hate speech” etc. Indeed, one of their doormats in the msm (himself apparently a Jew) has already publicized on Twitter and on the LBC (radio station) website a file relating to various “cases” where the police and/or CPS have not prosecuted mostly rather innocuous tweets and other online postings.
The Zionists of the CAA are using the entirely unrelated shooting event in Pittsburgh, USA to try to shut down legitimate freedom of expression in the UK…and are being aided and abetted by other Zionists in the decadent UK mass media milieu.
The new DPP, before he listens to any of the CAA’s nonsense, should bear in mind that, quite apart from the various alleged illegalities perpetrated by CAA persons (and which are currently under police investigation), the CAA has made a number of frivolous and indeed malicious complaints (to the police, to the CPS, to Twitter etc) against quite a large number of people, including David Icke, Al Jazeera TV, the Jewish anti-Zionist Gilad Atzmon, and even against me. In fact, in its 4+ years of operation, the CAA has only scored two “victories” of any significance, to wit against Jez Turner (Jeremy Bedford-Turner) and against the singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz (who is in any case presently appealing both conviction and sentence).
The CAA’s membership numbers are secret, but thought by many to number only a few hundred, certainly not many more if its Parliament Square and other demonstrations are anything to go by. Crowds numbering between 50 and 200 individuals.
In order to assist Max Hill Q.C. and his staff in any deliberations, I commend my own experience of victimization by these Jewish-Zionist and pro-Israel fanatics. The events described took place in January 2017, so nearly two years ago now, and the blog post dates from about 18 months ago.
The Jew Stephen Silverman of South Essex, the so-called “Head of Enforcement” at the “CAA” (“Campaign Against Antisemitism”) fake charity, and who was exposed in open court (Westminster Magistrates’ Court) as a pseudonymous troll and stalker of women, has recently been complaining that the DPP will not meet with Silverman or his colleagues (who include Joe Glasman, an evil snooper, and Stephen Applebaum of Edgware, North London, soi-disant “film critic” and house husband; Applebaum was also a very malicious and pseudonymous troller and stalker of women before he was exposed).
If it is true that the DPP will not agree to have his ear bent by the CAA trolls, it must be because, at long last, the CPS (and police?) are waking up to the maliciousness of these Jews, and to their politically-motivated “lawfare” against those with whom they disagree (“those whom they hate” would be more accurate).