I write on the 79th anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attack, or as F.D. Roosevelt had it, “a day which will live in infamy“. An interesting topic, but not one about which I have anything to say today at least.
I have written previously about the need for social-national communities, and in particular about the need to concentrate forces in as few areas as possible, in order to create “critical mass”, or as Clausewitz and his successors put it, a Schwerpunkt, today in the Western world more commonly called a “centre of gravity”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_of_gravity_(military). Other translations have included “focal point”.
My previous blog posts on the subject, as applied to socio-politics in the UK of the present day: https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2016/11/16/new-communities-in-england-and-wales-for-social-nationalists/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/07/17/how-would-the-safe-zone-become-a-germinal-ethnostate/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/10/22/why-should-people-relocate-to-the-safe-zone-of-the-germinal-ethnostate/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/07/10/getting-real-about-repatriation-creation-of-the-british-ethnostate/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/03/04/the-way-forward-for-social-nationalism-in-the-uk/amp/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/02/04/white-flight-in-a-small-country/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/09/17/europe-will-soon-be-in-chaos-we-can-create-a-new-civilization-from-that/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/07/05/the-pressing-need-for-safe-zones-in-the-uk-and-across-europe/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/10/17/post-collapse-survival-preservation-of-civilization-and-culture/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2016/12/20/from-secure-base-to-national-power/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2016/11/24/concentration-of-resident-supporters-in-the-germinal-ethnostate/; https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2016/11/10/fortress-centres-of-culture-and-science/.
Thoughts about wider issues but connected to the above are found here: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/26/the-tide-is-coming-in-reflections-on-the-possible-end-of-our-present-civilization-and-what-might-follow/.
The intensifying censorship across the Western world, including Internet censorship and (((control))), makes such communities even more essential. It has been seen that even relatively mainstream commentators and publicists are now often “deplatformed” either by State action or (more commonly) by the biased staff of major online platforms: Twitter, Facebook, YouTube etc. The Jewish or Jew-Zionist element is behind much of it, but the “antifa” type of “useful idiot” is often involved as well.
The time may come when open dissidence online is all but banned. Even now, particularly known individuals are barred from exercizing their civil right to dissent and comment online, via Jewish-instigated “lawfare”. Alison Chabloz, the satirical singer-songwriter (whose latest trial is set down for 17 December 2020) has been subject (whether lawfully or not— an open question) to police and court-ordered bail conditions for nearly a year now, which conditions have included a general ban on Internet posting!
The need for real, offline, social-national community has never been more pressing.
Thus it was with pleasure that I have noticed, in recent months, a growing understanding of the above from various people who post on Twitter. Some need little introduction, such as Nick Griffin. Others were unknown to me until recently, and seem to be clustering around the Patriotic Alternative group, whose leader, Mark Collett, was himself expelled from Twitter not long ago and his bank account frozen or withdrawn (!), though he seems to be still on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdf14z6V0MWNeVcbAz0r8wQ
Laura Towler is one name that has caught my attention: https://twitter.com/thisislaurat
Another Twitter account worth looking at: https://twitter.com/Amy_amorie
This is where we are in the UK. Incarceration disguised as “care”. Just like hate disguised as “anti-hate” or, indeed, “Hope Not Hate”…
We hear much about the supposedly terrible German “Nuremberg Laws” of the mid-1930s, but in fact they were defensive in nature, aiming at protection of the German people from exploitation, and also aiming at the protection of the future of the German people.
One sees nonsense constantly from those who believe that the Nuremberg Laws meant that Jews were all rounded up, arrested, sent to labour camps etc.
As a matter of fact, the legal definition of “Jewish” was, if anything, rather moderate:
|Deutschblütiger||German-blooded||German||Belongs to the German race and nation; approved to have Reich citizenship|
|Deutschblütiger||German-blooded||1⁄8 Jewish||Considered as belonging to the German race and nation; approved to have Reich citizenship|
|Mischling zweiten Grades||Mixed race (second degree)||1⁄4 Jewish||Only partly belongs to the German race and nation; approved to have Reich citizenship|
|Mischling ersten Grades||Mixed race (first degree)||3⁄8 or 1⁄2 Jewish||Only partly belongs to the German race and nation; approved to have Reich citizenship|
|Jude||Jew||3⁄4 Jewish||Belongs to the Jewish race and community; not approved to have Reich citizenship|
|Jude||Jew||Jewish||Belongs to the Jewish race and community; not approved to have Reich citizenship|
As can be seen from that table, even persons who were half-Jewish, i.e. with one Jewish parent, were usually permitted full citizenship rights.
Jews were eventually prohibited from becoming members of certain occupations, such as politicians, journalists, lawyers, judges. That reversed what had been the position under the 1918-1933 Weimar Republic (and what is or is fast-becoming the situation in the UK of 2020), when Jews almost monopolized some occupations.
Few people today know that the more extreme manifestations of “antisemitic” law, such as forcing Jews to wear identifying yellow stars (surely unnecessary in most cases?), only came into force under the pressure of war, and (surely correctly) noting the Jewish population as a large hostile bloc within Germany during wartime.
The Americans interned all Japanese-Americans (most of whom lived in California and Hawaii) a short time after Pearl Harbor; most lost their homes and valuable possessions.
Note the date for the “yellow star” decree: September 1941, two years after the Second World War had started and eight years after Adolf Hitler attained supreme power as Chancellor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_badge#Nazi_Germany_and_Axis_Powers_2.
There were still 900 registered Jews in Berlin itself in early 1945.
More tweets seen
There is climatic change in parts of the world (eg Australia, now far hotter than it was when I was there for three years as a child, in the late 1960s) but the causation is not really proven, certainly not completely. As for the remedy, if any, that is even less certain.
Strange to see maybe two (presumably) intelligent people actually discussing the above as if “left wing” and “right wing” actually mean anything…
Incredible that a melonhead like James Cleverly (complete with “degree” in Hospitality Management) is actually a Minister of State! I must do a “Deadhead MPs” piece about him before too long.
A nice idea, but the sun has finally set on our Empire. We must look for our future elsewhere…
More tweets seen
People talk about the French Resistance, which is and was largely a myth, at least until, as Hitchens says above, compulsory labour service was introduced in late 1942. The young labour evaders started to hide out with the small existing Maquis bands (some of which, if not most, were little more than bandits) in remote countryside.
The only active “French Resistance” prior to 1943 were the networks of spies and saboteurs run by either Gaullists or Communists, both of which were controlled by and/or dependent upon (for money and weapons) foreign states, notably Britain and the Soviet Union. The British also ran independent networks. These connected with but were separate from the “escape and evasion” networks run by, mostly, the British MI9: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI9
For once, I agree with Hodges. “Lockdown” or semi-lockdowns and shutdowns are killing Britain economically, socially and in terms of people suffering and dying completely unnecessarily from other, non-“Covid, conditions.
These shutdowns and restrictions are just not sustainable and should never have been implemented, certainly not for longer than a month. Economy trashed, retail sector especially trashed, civil liberties trashed, society as a whole trashed. For what? Because there exists a public health problem which has killed 1 in 1,400 people in the UK? Disproportionate panic measures.
24 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 7 December 2020, including Nuremberg laws and social-national communities”
Hello Ian: I have to say that I am surprised how lenient the “Nuremberg Laws” were. Any person who was 50% Jewish should never have been allowed citizenship. Anyway, it is all water under the bridge now.
Regarding the status of the “German” Jews in the Third Reich, there is a very interesting book. Of course, the author makes acrobatics trying to reconcile reality with fantasy. Let’s put it bluntly if Hitler was obsessed with killing all the Jews, regardless of their racial make-up, why would he give to those who were partially Jewish an alibi? In fact, as the book proves, they were allowed to join the Armed Forces, showing that, they were honourable men who considered themselves first and foremost German/Aryan. The presentation of the book is hilarious and typical of Jewzon (sorry, Amazon)
As you say. Also, why evacuate the inmates of camps such as Auschwitz on marches westward as the Red Army approached? I have read innumerable accounts by Jews of how they were in half a dozen camps inc. Auschwitz, in some cases from 1939 right through to 1945. Scarcely a pleasant experience, but they were never shot, gassed etc.
James Cleverly is, of course, only a government minister by virtue of the colour of his skin just like numerous others ie Priti effing Useless, the extras from The Jewel In The Crown otherwise known as Rishi Sunak, Alok Sharna etc, etc.
The globalist, anti-British spivs of the CONServative Party may have convinced themselves that these people are there on merit alone but to anyone with any degree of political understanding it is clear they have been chosen merely to make the CON Party appear to be ‘in with the times’, ‘modern’, ‘inclusive’ and to get a larger slice of the ethnic vote.🙄🙄
James, even more than the others, isn’t very bright. His surname should be Thickerly.
It is hard to think that today’s CONServative Party once had half-decent people like Stanley Baldwin and Neville Chamberlain leading it!
How the previously mighty have fallen, eh?🙄☹️😞
That, m’Lord of Essex, is true of all the System parties. I wonder what, say Clement Attlee would have thought of Diane Abbott or the other black MPs now or of recent years? Indeed, what would that very erudite Liberal, Jo Grimond, have thought of the LibDems of recent years?
Sadly, that is the case! All the ‘System’ parties have degenerated a great deal in recent years. Yes, the Liberal Democrats don’t have anyone who can measure up to that towering figure of British Liberalism, Jo Grimond, or even the last pretty capable leader they had ie Paddy Ashdown. Out of their much reduced representation in the House of Commons, Ed Davey, was their best choice.
Do Yank news channels and newspapers get the political structure of the United Kingdom correct EVER? The Isle of Wight isn’t ‘ an island off the coast of the UK’. On the contrary, it IS an island OF the United Kingdom in that it is a fully integral part of the UK and has an MP (soon to be two) in the House of Commons to prove it!
If they get basic facts like this wrong then, frankly, is it any wonder why so many Americans, let alone embittered Irish-Americans like Joe Biden, can’t understand the full facts of the NI situation?🙄🙄🙄🙄😡🤬
LikeLiked by 1 person
That CBS ‘News’ report would only be true in the cases of the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man which are British Crown Dependences and thus are NOT a part of the United Kingdom, have full internal self-government, and therefore don’t send MPs to the House of Commons in London.
Bliar’s government was profoundly GLOBALIST and didn’t give a Castlemain’s XXXX about Britain or the British people ie its complete open door immigration policies, its joining in with the Zionist USA’s aggressive war against Iraq when no plausible case could be made for that with regard to the most essential British national interests.😡🤬😞☹️
Its economic policies were pretty ‘Right-wing’ in the sense that they allowed free market forces a near unhindered free reign and didn’t intervene much in the economy as previous Labour governments would have done,
The broad mass of the British electorate is to the ‘Right’ on social issues ie immigration, law and order, abortion etc ie ‘socially conservative’ but to the ‘Left’ or ‘centrist’ on economics. One of the reasons UKIP failed to truely break through was not just our profoundly undemocratic electoral system of First Past The Post which ‘wastes’ around 50% of all votes put into it in the sense that these votes DON’T elect a candidate in the single-member constituencies as an MP but also because UKIP’s economic stance was perceived to be too ‘Right-wing’ ie too free market orientated, too libertarian in character.
Re. UKIP, m’Lord of Essex, I blogged many times to that effect, as you may have noticed in previous years.
Re: Pearl Harbour it is a real shame the ‘Britain of the East’ ie Japan was not an ally of Britain during WW2 as they were in WW1.
Our idiots in the Foreign Office should have continued our alliance with Japan post the 1920’s and not upset them as they did. Japan should have been a powerful ally of Britain not an enemy.
With America destined to be a Third World country soon with the politics to match ie a permanent, anti-British Democrat administration we need new allies: we should build one, anew, with Japan. They can form a ‘Special Relationship’ with us!
M’Lord of Essex:
China is threatening the world. A powerful Japan would be a counterweight to that, but as it is it cannot be, firstly because it is prevented from being so by its own constitution and by American policy, but equally because of its ageing population. Perhaps also because it is focussed on economic performance.
Having said that, Japan’s population is only about 9% of that of China.
I am not sure about the intentions of the new Japanese PM but their previous one, Shinzo Abe, was looking to seriously revise that American-written pacifist constitution so as to allow Japan to play a more assertive role in world affairs. Perhaps Yoshihide Suga might continue with those plans?
M’Lord of Essex:
I do not know enough about Japanese politics to be able to say.
I apprehend, though, that any Japanese military and naval activities will be defensive, in view of the aggressive expansionism of China (especially in those regions abutting China itself: the South China Sea and around).
I’ve always been a big admirer of the Japanese. Japan’s post WW2 rise from being the only country in the world to suffer the devastation of nuclear warfare, being a bombed-out wreck to being an economic superpower is a great example of the success that nationalist policies can bring.
M’Lord of Essex:
Consistent and congruent policies, together with a disciplined (self-disciplined) population. Also, there is a basically capitalist economic model, which outstrips the socialist model. That can be seen in countries split along capitalist/socialist lines, as in Germany 1945-1989 and in Korea, as well as other places. Capitalism has to be regulated to work for people, but it produces a better socio-economic result than socialism as applied to date.
Ian, with respect, I do not believe that we should countenance for one second the prospect of fleeing to create reservations or ghettos of nationalist communities away from our own heartlands. Most whites. and prosperous members of the ethnic communities have already done so over the last 40 years and I believe it is known as “White flight”. It is because of this very cowardice and self -interest that we are in the mess we are in today. I have heard this argument made from other nationalist voices and although it seems rooted in common sense one only has to scratch the surface to see how utterly impractical such a strategy is for the millions of working class British nationalists who will be forever unable to afford such a move out to the rarefied rural/semi rural locations without the financial means to do so. And even if it were possible we would be merely creating a ready and easy target for ourselves. No, we stand and we fight and not one step back.
Were there a realistic chance for a social-national movement to thrive in the main urban centres, I would agree. Were there an existing and credible social-national movement and/or party, I would also agree. I see neither. I see small groups, often spread over the whole country, with a few in each place, or atomized individuals, isolated when not online. That is why I favour a move to one or two, or to a few, “focal points” or “centres of gravity”, where real momentum can be attained.
But how can such a move be achieved? Realistically? If you advertise it, it would be targeted immediately. All that happens when successful Whites flee for the “good life” to places like Thanet and Cheshire is they drink wine and vote Tory. No successful social revolution in history was ever achieved by advocating run away and re- group somewhere. No, with the greatest of respect, we must fight where we stand. Only when sufficient ordinary people experience the horror of what lies in store for them will there be an irresistible demand for a genuine Nationalist movement to emerge. One without the slightest need for foreign historically derived aesthetics either. Some things were “not for export”. Nationalism is best when it is home grown and runs concomitant with the true soul of its people. If it is not, it is destined to fail.
I hear what you say, but so far there *is* no inclination on the part of the English or other Britsh people to fight what is happening, even to the extent of joining any social national party.
As far as the large cities are concerned, the populations are becoming non-white.
There may be a necessity to keep the flag flying in places where no electoral or other victory is likely (just as the Conservatives, and Labour, always put up candidates in places where they always get 10% of the vote), but that will not win the field.
Analysis of NSDAP election results shows that NSDAP support came from the smaller cities, towns, and villages, never from the very large cities such as Berlin and Hamburg.
I agree that parallels can only be stretched so far. It may be, though, that the future will be even more dystopian than some of us now imagine. It may be that we need a “focal point”…I see no such point or area at present, though several have possibilities.
It could be said that the Bolsheviks “ran away” to “regroup” in Switzerland, London, and elsewhere. They were still able to take advantage of events, when those events happened. Yes, they had to *return* to fight, but were not on the spot when “the balloon went up” (the leadership, that is). The Bolshevik followers were in the main cities, yes, but they were still few, even in 1917.
The bottom line is that there has to be a “centre of gravity”, whether in Cornwall or London or Manchester, and at present there is none.
DJF: Very good observation, speaking as a concerned White man for the future of our people (I am not a Brit) I agree with you that not only working-class Britons but all working-class White families in Europe, the USA, Australia and NZ have nowhere to go. The price of properties went through the roof over the last 30 years and is impossible, even for a White middle-class young couple to buy a home.
Besides if you advertise a “White community” you will be attacked and destroyed since, at least in the US, you don’t have the right to choose your own neighbours, therefore you cannot refuse any coloured person or family that wants to settle next to you.
I believe that the situation will reach a critical, terrible, point of no-return and White people will be forced to sort out themselves. Many will die, but they deserve it. We reach this point through sheer cowardice and apathy. Like in Russia during the terrible winter of 1941-42 the situation will be “stand your ground and fight where you are, retreat is not an option.” BTW Hitler was right, as later on his generals admitted. As I said, many will die, but so be it.
But what of the millions of votes cast for Brexit? Or the election of Idiot Johnson with his eighty seat majority? I think there is a huge sea of latent discontent lying beneath the surface across whole swathes of the UK just waiting to erupt but being marshalled into the controlled opposition of Farage, Hopkins et al. All gong and no dinner! Surely those Bolshevik leaders could flee abroad because their International Capitalist Financiers bankrolled them. There will be no languorous sojourn on the banks of some Swiss village for us. Centres of gravity are already there. They just need to be tapped with a genuine Nationalist movement disciplined in the furtherance of British ideals. The Viet Cong did not avoid South Vietnam because it was full of the most advanced military force the world had ever seen. They stayed, they fought (albeit dirty) and they won in the end. To borrow a phrase, maybe Nationalists should move through our people like fish among the sea!
I do not disagree with you. The potential is there. My view is that “all roads lead to Rome”. The “centres of gravity” are (imo) important, to reach critical mass quicker, but that does not preclude a *political* organization existing *both* in those “Schwerpunkt” areas *and also* in the rest of the country.
As you say, the UK has become more volatile. The Conservatives did not, as such, “win” 2019 (their percentage vote increased by only 1.2 points over 2017), but Labour certainly lost (down by well over 8 points compared to 2017).
There *is* a vacuum, only partly filled by the Farage scams UKIP and Brexit Party.