Diary Blog, 3 March 2023, including more thoughts about the Ukraine situation

Morning music

On this day a year ago

Tweets seen

The David Morgan account is one of the best on Twitter at present.

I blogged a couple of months ago about my two younger brothers, one in the UK and one in Australia, both of whom have been sportsmen all their lives, and neither of which had ever had cardiac problems until they were “vaccinated” with the “Covid” “vaccines”, as well as each having “boosters”.

Last year, both were taken to hospital as emergency heart cases. Both had to have by-pass operations (one a triple by-pass). Though both are now recovered, for me those incidents are at least anecdotal proof of the dangers of these botched “vaccines”. I am glad that I resisted the several attempts made to offer me the bloody stuff.

Exactly.

As regular readers of the blog will know, I myself never use the lazy and almost useless “Left/Right” descriptors.

Time to post again the following, American-oriented but also useful for the UK, and basically correct, poster:

We all know that, in the end, there is only one way to end this, and to save Europe and thus the future of the whole world, but if anyone were to express it straitforwardly, for example on this blog, the System police would visit, and the System prosecution drones would probably prosecute me (or whoever).

God. Just look at that loony…

Still, a couple of rounds would do it…

Apart from which, the pathetic cultural references are usually obscure and not worth knowing about, eg “celebrities” of whom I have literally never heard, and others the names of which I have heard but of whom I know nothing, and want to know nothing.

See also: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/26/the-tide-is-coming-in-reflections-on-the-possible-end-of-our-present-civilization-and-what-might-follow/.

Aim: a one-world government controlled mainly by (((you know who)));

Method: create a series of manufactured and/or contrived “crises” in order to make people afraid, and also add in to that mix a number of false narratives.

The “holocaust” farrago, global warming/climate change, other weather/climate-related scares such as “the ozone layer”, asteroids hitting the Earth, sea-level rising, “Y2K” (remember that one?) “Black Lives Matter” and other “racism” nonsense (though not Jewish supremacism…), “Covid”, “Bird Flu”, and so on.

If some of the foregoing have a small element of truth contained within the “bodyguard of lies“, so much the better for the transnational conspiracy. That helps with credibility, of course.

More tweets

Hard to believe, but that silly-looking little geek is actually the Director-General or “DG” of MI5, the Security Service: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_McCallum.

As an outsider, my own idea of a “spymaster”, or chief of an intelligence agency, would be someone with a wide cultural background, as well as the ability to create a feeling of confidence both in his officers and agents and also in government; someone such as Maurice Oldfield [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Oldfield], or Markus Wolf [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Wolf].

“Jack Monroe”

Thought I would check in on Patreon, to see how many utter mugs are still sending money to fake “poverty expert” and “cook” (if you like horrible dogs’ dinners, or spaghetti sandwiches), “Jack Monroe”.

Turns out that (since a day or two ago) a few more mugs have seen the light and so stopped paying her between £3.50 and £44 a month for nothing but a virtue-signal that no-one even sees. Still, 479 mugs paying out does add up to between £1,677 and £21,076 each month.

What the real amount she gets (from that Patreon source alone) is a matter for speculation, but quite likely several thousand pounds a month. Taxfree (probably). In the Essex argot, one could call it “a nice little earner” for doing absolutely nothing.

More tweets

More music

[Hollywood Bowl]

More tweets

Well, that must be right. Let us say, for the purposes of argument and suspending disbelief, that the Kiev-regime forces win everything they say they want, and thus push Russian forces out of the regions of Lugansk, Donetsk, and Crimea, leaving the Russian civilians who live there to flee, be killed, or be subjected to ethnic Ukrainian martial law (unable even to speak Russian in public). What then?

Do the politicians and military top brass of NATO states think that Russia would let that happen, or let that happen without revenge and retaliation?

Were it to happen that Russian forces were pushed back to beyond the pre-2014 borders, Russia would probably respond by flattening Kiev and the major cities of eastern Ukraine, then marching in new armies over the rubble.

The fact remains that, regardless of the military fantasies of the Zelensky regime, or the likes of the BBC and Sky News, Russia cannot lose this conflict in the end. If it prevails on the conventional battlefield, it has not “lost”, though such a victory would be bitter and not exactly a “win”. On the other hand, if the Kiev regime prevails on the battlefield, all that happens is that Russia uses the weapons (including nuclear) which it possesses and which the Kiev regime does not possess and will not possess even in 20 years or even 100 years.

I repeat, Russia cannot “lose” this war, and the Kiev regime cannot “win”.

There is a third possibility, which is that the war drags on, with the Western powers supplying more and advanced weaponry etc, until a bloody stalemate ensues, as in WW1. The West will not give Kiev and Zelensky weapons that are nuclear or can hit Moscow and other long-range targets (Moscow is 300 miles from the Ukraine border, 500 miles from Kiev).

If such a battlefield stalemate were to occur (and we are not very far from that now, really), the West would be waiting for Putin to die and/or be replaced. That assumes that the replacement would be more conciliatory. He might not be.

Still, I think that 2023 might yet see an unexpected Russian advance, with much of eastern Ukraine falling into Russian hands.

More tweets

There are enough mugs in the UK to keep all those “grifters” (and others, e.g. “non-practising” medic, Julia Grace Patterson) from having to get a job or go on the dole. “Femi’s” £624 a month may not be much, but useless Nigerian talking head “Femi” does also have free accommodation (in his affluent parents’ house), and also gets money by being a loudmouth on Sky etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femi_Oluwole.

As a matter of fact, I would say that “Femi” is about a 3/1 shot for selection as a Labour MP at some point.

Talking of careerists and grifters…

Political views as expressed usually somewhere between socialist, anarcho-syndicalist, and god-knows-what. However was he selected for a Starmer-Labour candidature? Well, he is part-Jew, and seems to be pro-war when it suits the NWO/ZOG interest, or so it seems to me. I think that, for Mason, socialism, anarcho-syndicalism and post-Marxism carry less weight than careerism.

I have to admit that I mistrust anyone who both has two (or is it three?) homes, yet claims to be a radical, or even a kind of revolutionary.

A tweet very typical of those I have seen this evening about Mason.

Late music

7 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 3 March 2023, including more thoughts about the Ukraine situation”

  1. Regarding the article of “The Spectator”; it is true that Putin/Russia enjoys a great deal of sympathy from most countries but let’s face it, they have no power nor influence. They are very much like the pathetic, insignificant countries that declared war on Germany from 1943 onwards when the writing was on wall. Their influence in the outcome of WW2? ZERO!

    The only thing that matters is the evil giant called the USA and its European lackeys (Great Britain, Germany, France, Poland, Norway, and Sweden)

    Like

    1. Claudius:
      As you say. The former so-called “Third World” is a collection of spectators. Even the Arabs with oil are not of importance now. The only game in town is that being played by the USA + allies, by Russia + its —few— allies, and by China. Three big players. To that extent, Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four” was prophetic.

      Like

  2. The observation made by “Bobby” on Twitter about the use of subtitles reflects the appalling tendency of making films about subhumans (white, black or brown) who speak an awful jargon known only to themselves.

    I shall give you an example. If I watch a Spanish movie set in the past or in an upper-middle class environment, I shall be able to understand almost practically everything in spite of the differences in the accent and vocabulary. If I watch a Spanish film set in present-day Spain with characters drawn from slums and full of foreigners who can hardly speak Spanish, I will need subtitles.

    Having said that, most English and American films and TV productions are impossible to watch due to their disgusting content and political/cultural message; and let’s not talk about the racial “diversity” imposed on period dramas. In that regard your country is, by far, the worst. If I remembered correctly some bastards complained that the film “1917” did not showed any Indian soldiers!

    Like

    1. Claudius:
      You may be interested to know that, in the 1980s, I met in London a few old ladies, aged in their eighties and nineties, who had escaped from Russia in 1917-18 or not much later. “Former people”, as they were once known.

      Those old ladies, mostly titled if I recall, had such clear Russian that I could often understand them fairly well; whereas, I often could not follow the speech of contemporary (1980s) Soviet Russians well (or sometimes at all). The latter spoke much faster, and used many slang expressions.

      The same is true of the works of Tolstoy as compared to those of Solzhenitsyn.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I agree with because I remembered that nearly 20 years ago, I tried to watch a Spanish movie set in contemporary Spain and the way the actors spoke was awful; I could not understand 80% of what they said. Obviously, I gave up very soon.

    Theirs was a combination of speaking fast and mumbling. They were unable to speak nicely and clearly. It is NOT a coincidence that spelling and eloquence, in verbal or written form, have experience a terrible decadence. Most people under 40 are semiliterate when I compared them with my generation (born in 1959)

    Like

  4. Funny enough, I made a couple of mistakes: 1) I meant to say “I agree with you” 2) I should have written “have experienced a terrible decadence”. So much for me complaining about bad grammar and spelling! (LOL)

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s