Morning music

Tweets seen
Whitty strikes me as the sort of bureaucrat who, as Khrushchev said of Malenkov, should never be given power (admittedly, the second part might have applied to Khrushchev himself).
US aid and military involvement in the Israel-Iran fight might yet lead to entanglement and a possible superpower nuclear confrontation; US military involvement, directly, in the Russia-Ukraine war would almost certainly lead to nuclear war before very long. That is the difference. That, and the fact that the Jewish/Zionist/Israel lobby effectively rules over American politics. Most of their politicians are under control, basically.
Ha ha! So 51% of young Frenchmen are willing to fight for “Ukraine” (the regime in Kiev)? If it were even 5%, I should be amazed.
“The shark can smell blood in the water a mile off when it is hungry” [John le Carre, The Spy Who Came in from the Cold].
The Jewish/Zionist/Israel lobby would like to criminalize any criticism of Jewish or Israeli behaviour, and also any positive or even neutral analysis of the enemies of Israel.
Britain was once known as the home of free speech. No longer.
Incidentally, should any generous persons like to help me defray the Court-imposed costs of my recent free speech trial, the link is here: https://www.givesendgo.com/GC14J. If you cannot donate, at least share the link. Thank you.
A much-overworked word, “top”, as shown in that tweet. Likewise, barristers and other lawyers are often (and usually wrongly) described as “top“; as in “top lawyer Mark Lewis“, which years ago was used re. Mark Lewis, the Jewish Zionist solicitor briefly well-known a decade or more ago during the “phonehacking” affair, who fled to Israel several years ago following his “conviction” by a Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal for having posted some violently insulting social media posts.
Despite Lewis having been described for several years as “top lawyer” by various msm outlets, Lewis’s own Counsel at that Tribunal hearing said that Lewis owned only his clothes, a mobility scooter, and a private pension worth £70 per week.
Moral of the story? Never trust the msm.
If anyone wants to read more about Lewis, use the search box on the blog.
The flip-side of “top” may be “disgraced“, as (again, wrongly) used about me by “the usual suspects” and their scribbler dupes in the msm; in my case by reason of my (wrongful and unlawful) disbarment in 2016 and my recent conviction for having allegedly posted [the truth] on this blog.
“Top“, in that sense, is what might be called “Sun-speak”, used in tabloid “newspapers” but rarely in real life, along with “scorcher“, “fury“, “tot” (for a small child, not a small drink of spirits), and”far-right” (social-national) etc.
Hasn’t Goodwin worked out what forces are really behind the EU and NWO? (((you know who)))…
“They” always try to shut down free speech.
Goodwin may need to not antagonize “the usual suspects”, though.
Controlled opposition.
I often say that, but some (pro-immigration) people think that they “know better” than me…
It is very unlikely that Israel will still be in existence in 2034.
“Israel will surely respond to the Iranian attack, the question is in scale, instruments and time, according to Grigory Lukyanov, research associate of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Israel’s entire security strategy is built on the maxim that no attack on Israeli territory can go unanswered and that the answer must exceed the magnitude of the damage and the blow inflicted on Israel and its interests.”
What Gullis prefers not to understand is that people are voting, or intending to vote, Reform UK not because they expect their candidates, most of them, to win Commons seats or other elected positions (beyond local council level), but precisely because they know that voting Reform UK will hole the Conservative ship below the waterline, and sink it, along with the Conservative candidates.
Those voting Reform UK want to punish the existing government of clowns, even at the expense of inviting into government another bunch of clowns possibly even more toxic.
Polls show that almost all Reform UK voters believe that Reform UK will win few seats; even in their own constituencies where they vote, most (60%) do not believe that the Reform candidate will win.
What those voters are doing is making a protest vote against the whole rigged Westminster system, FPTP etc; they are also punishing the Conservative Party for being so useless generally, and especially on immigration and migration invasion, on law and order, and on things like NHS services. They are passing judgment on the Conservative Party, as well as saying “we want and deserve better” and “we want our country back” (which latter may or may not be possible now).
Reform UK voters, most of them, would never vote directly for Labour, not even tactically, but are going to steel themselves to vote Reform UK knowing that Labour victories, and some LibDem victories, will be the result. If Reform UK wins a few Commons seats, then (for those voters) that would be a bonus.
An appeal such as that by Gullis probably encourages Reform UK intending voters to stick to their guns.
[Update, 15 May 2024: Well, Gullis has now had his answer— Labour won that mayoral election, if only “by a neck, cleverly”, as they say on the racecourse. Labour 37.8%, Conservative 37.5%, Independent 11.7%, Reform UK 5.8%, and Greens 5.2%. The Con candidate would probably have won if Reform UK did not exist; most Reform UK voters would have voted Con, were the present Government not so utterly useless. There were few votes separating Con and Lab— 1,508 votes, in fact. The Reform UK candidate attracted 34,471 votes… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_West_Midlands_mayoral_election].
The result of constant msm propaganda. There is no reason for there to be a Third World War because of either the Ukraine situation or that in and around Israel, but certain groups in the West, mainly, are pushing for war.
Incidentally, what you rarely see is how Israel is, potentially, a threat, indeed a nuclear missile threat, to the UK and the rest of Europe:

I think that he means “unquestioning“, but yes.
Both UK and USA— corrupted.
Well, it could not be more clear what (((group))) is pulling Starmer’s strings. Everything about him, his political life, his personal life etc, makes that very clear. Putting it clearly, Starmer is a puppet.
When I had a Twitter account, it was one of a handful of individual Twitter accounts Icke followed; later, of course, the Jew-Zionist/pro-Israel cabal had me expelled, by pressuring Twitter (in 2018). Icke too, though he has returned, and I have not (and do not intend to return).
I once (about 1980) read an unpublished typescript in a dusty file (typed and placed in said file sometime around 1930 but a translation from a German original of about 1923) talking about how, within about 200 years (i.e. sometime around 2100 and thereafter), a web of part-human, part-robot “creatures” would criss-cross the Earth, but above the Earth (if I recall aright), and human beings would be to some extent dependent upon and in thrall to that web of intelligent human-robot creatures.
Was that just imaginative nonsense? I do not know but, looking at the Internet, looking at the rapid progress of AI, and looking at how human society is today already very dependent upon computerized systems etc (not only for physical activities but also for decision-making), I cannot simply dismiss it as over-imaginative speculation, or even a hoax.
I should like to read that manuscript again, if it still exists, but unfortunately I now have no access to the vault where it was stored.
Matt Goodwin, whose free speech has been interfered with, is very vocal in favour of Israel and the UK Jewish lobby. They are the main group shutting down free speech in the UK, and have been for decades. Goodwin should reflect on that old American saying “what goes around comes around“…
So how are we in the social-national world going to deal with the regime of those who will be “elected” dictators of the UK in less than a year (maybe only a few months)? Answers “on a postcard”, but don’t expect me to publish them— free speech is already all but dead in the UK, and the expected Labour Friends of Israel government of Starmer, Rachel Reeves, Yvette Cooper, Wes Streeting etc will finish the job, destroying what little is left of freedom of expression in this country.
Late music

The so-called ‘Campaign Against Anti-Semitism’ is, in reality, an utterly vile, devious, group of troublemakers who aren’t really interested in combating genuine anti-semitism but more interested in promoting Zionism and supporting the actions of the vile Zionist, continual international law defying bandit/terrorist state in the Near/Middle East.
The Zionist entity PROMOTED the Iranian attack by itself attacking the Iranian consulate. If that disgraceful action had not been done Iran would not have sent missiles to the bandit state.
WHEN, oh WHEN, CAA, is your beloved Zionist state going to adhere to international law and act like a normal, civilised member of the international community?
LikeLike
Jonathan Gullis used to be a school teacher! God Almighty! No wonder the state education system turns out dunces so many times compared to governmental systems in well-governed countries like South Korea where their system turns out the highest average rate of graduates in the world on a yearly basis.
The thick Tory MP needs to realise that HIS OWN party is responsible for the rise of Reform UK and if they ‘help’ the CONServative Party candidate lose that mayoral election then changing the electoral system for these contests from the Supplementary Vote (SV) where a voter could express a first choice in the first round and a second one in a possible second round to the First Past The Post system where a voter only has a first preference was not a wise move. FPTP often leads to fragmented voting shares and contests being lost on ‘split’ votes because the system is so inherently crude and basic it can’t really cope with more than two candidates. That is a major reason it is out of date CRAP, Mr Gullis!
The Elections Bill 2022 yet another cock-up by The ClownTM otherwise known as Boris-Idiot!
The fake Conservative Party is not known as ‘Britain’s Stupid Party’ for nothing. They are a danger to themselves let alone this blighted globalised business park/economic zone/’country’.
LikeLike
What an absolute DISGRACE to treat Sir Alan Duncan in that way! The bought and paid for by the Pro Israel Zionist Lobby unelected diminutive despot and budding dictator in No.10 must be booted out NOW!
Sir Alan Duncan has more personal integrity in one finger than the wretched Zionist fanatic creature Sunak has in his entire body.
It would be disgraceful to treat Sir Alan Duncan like that at anytime but is especially so when he was the victim of a plot by officials in in the Israeli Embassy in London to ‘take down’ UK politicians considered to be Pro Palestinian as Sir Alan Duncan was when he was a Foreign Office minister and MP.
LikeLike
John:
I am not a huge fan of Duncan, who after all was a gopher for the Jewish fraudster/business leech Marc Rich (Marcell Reich), but at least he has some principles, unlike most MPs.
As for booting out Sunak, fine, but of course then in comes Starmer. That is how “they” operate, by controlling both runners in a 2-horse race. That is why “they” were desperate to chop Corbyn.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Rich
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Duncan#Business_career
LikeLike
With any luck both Sunak and Starmer will die soon. How any person with a single ounce of humanity can support the vicious Zionist state with its seven decades long oppression of Palestinians, its continuous defiance of international law is beyond me.
But then when did either of these wretched, foul, evil creatures have an ounce of common humanity or seek to do anything without a prospect of self-advancement?
The Starmer creature is all about self-advancement which may be one reason why he has broken EVERY promise he made to his party to gain its leadership. Personal integrity is a wholly alien concept to him.
LikeLike
It is high time the Israeli Embassy was shut down and its evil, quasi-fascist bitch of an Ambassador expelled from this country.
LikeLike
Sunak and Starmer both utterly vile, evil, completely contemptible creatures supporting Zionist genocide and war crimes against Palestinians and an out of control bandit state intent upon widening the conflict to embroil the Near/Middle East and perhaps the WORLD in a war.
The ‘gruesome twosome’ truely are repellent, foul, wretches of inhumanity. Starmer is a disgrace and anti-British to the very core of his being supporting the Zionist bandit state when it murdered three British people.
LikeLike
I like the way ‘Sir’ Keir Starmer puts on a fake intellectual air by wearing glasses at PM’s Question Time to try and look like a distinguished ‘human rights’ lawyer (what a SICK joke that is)
It doesn’t matter what sort of very expensive glasses or Savile Row suit he wears. He is still an evil, completely bought and paid for by the Zionist Pro Israel Lobby, anti-British, Zionist “without qualification” whore for Israel and inhumane monster and someone terminally unfit to be an MP let alone PM.
LikeLike
Why is Matt Goodwin in favour of Israel? Israel should not be supported by anyone who is decent and humane. It is a state that has been blatantly defying international law for decades ie since 1967 at least and some people would say earlier than that.
Is he anti-muslim? Even people who are should not support the Zionist entity. Zionists are not the friends of anyone in the world apart from their fellow Zionist lunatics. Zionists are a menace to Muslims, Palestinian Muslims and Christians in particular, to gentiles and to non-Zionist/anti-Zionist Jews.
Basically, Zionism is a menace to the GLOBE.
LikeLike
John:
Why Starmer is so pro-Israel, pro-Jewish lobby etc is not known to me. Careerism is probably a large part of it. Of course his wife is Jewish, an American property lawyer, I think I read.That may not be determinative but must be a factor anyway.
LikeLike
Meanwhile, instead of expelling illegal immigrants, bringing back capital punishment, changing our disgracefully pro-Zionist entity foreign policy which has emboldened Benjamin Netanhayu so much his armed forces murdered three British citizens in cold blood, bringing in guarantees to genuine free speech, changing the unfair electoral system or doing a myriad of other popular initiatives, Sunak’s big political idea to move hundreds of thousands if not millions of voters to the Conservative Party is to, wait for it, ban smoking!
Sunak -the unelected man with the distinct NON ‘midas touch’ when it comes to being successful in politics. How many more chances is he going to be given to revive Conservative Party fortunes before the inevitable step of Tory MPs sharpening their best quality Japanese kitchen knifes with folded Damascus steel blades and plunging them into his back has to be done?
LikeLike
John:
It may not be impossible, but to replace Sunak with some other clown at this late stage would be (I accept it is arguable) all but impossible. In any case, who would want to take on the “throne” knowing that a near wipe-out is likely this year? A poisoned chalice which few would want to take, knowing that that replacement would himself or herself be replaced within weeks of a general election, even if retaining his/her own seat?
LikeLike
Loved your comment about Whitty (pun intended) and the analogy with Kruschev and Malenkov. Whitty is a pathetic creature who belongs to the same as Farage, Douglas Murray, Laurence Fox, etc…
LikeLike
Claudius:
Of course, Whitty is supposedly a public servant.
LikeLike
I am afraid I disagree with you there. Mr Whitty tried his best to keep as many British people, particularly the most vulnerable, as possible safe from the international viral pandemic but he was frustrated in this aim to some extent by having to work with Boris-Idiot and his incompetent goon squad.
It is an insult to compare him to blowhard ‘controlled opposition’ Farage who still hasn’t come down off the fence to lead Reform UK. I wonder why? Have the Tories promised him a job or is his media career making him too much money?
LikeLike
Desperate Tory MPs look no further!: https://richmondcookshop.co.uk/product/kai-shun-premier-5-piece-knife-set
LikeLike
Matt Goodwin should be aware that it is very often Zionist groups who want to shut down discussion of the sort of issues he thinks we should be able to talk about freely.
Zionist Jew fanatics seem to be very fearful of and paranoid towards gentiles hence they feel safer in more ‘diverse’ societies. Therefore they approve of mass immigration and want to shut-up organisations opposed to it.
Zionist Jew paranoia is a problem. I don’t know how we are supposed to try and tame people like that who are neurotic and paranoid.
LikeLike
John:
In view of the continuing legal/judicial situation re. me and the blog, I had better not comment, in our “free” and “diverse” society…
LikeLike
I am sorry, in my previous comment I meant to write “belongs to the same group/team” and I left out the last word.
Regarding overused words that end up losing their proper meaning because of that (like “top”), I would like to add “award-winning”, “star”, “brilliant”, etc. The indiscriminate use of these words not only renders them meaningless but also shows the very poor education of those guilty of such malpractice.
This is not limited to the UK, of course, is a general malaise that affects the whole Western world where, over the last 30 years, the educational standards have dropped shamefully. The TV stations, radios and newspapers are full of illiterate idiots who believe they are clever and well-educated.
LikeLike
Claudius:
Thank you.
Another meaningless term, used frequently on TV and in the Press here, though never by real people in real life, is “national treasure”, applied to any well-known actor, actress, comic etc over the age of about 40. Nauseating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much for that! Yes, I forgot that one. I heard that awful expression for the first time in Australia in the late 1990s. Another one, almost as bad as that one and even more ridiculous, is “legend” 🤮🤮
LikeLike
Claudius:
Which in some places around London, maybe elsewhere too, is apparently now shortened to “lege” (pronounced “ledge”)…
LikeLike
‘National treasure’, Mary Elizabeth Truss, (ha, ha, only joking!) has said that the world was safer when Donald John Trump was US President and he was more supportive of Britain than ‘Sleepy Joe’ is.
I have to say I think she is correct, especially with regard to her latter comment. Joe Biden has an ancestral disliking for the United Kingdom on account of his Irish roots. Trump, on the other hand, does seem to have some warm feelings towards us no doubt because he has some Scottish ancestry from the village of Tong in the Western Isles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tong,Lewis
LikeLike
Ha, ha! Well done to some Ultra-Orthodox/Strictly-Orthodox anti-Zionist /non-Zionist British Jews who have sat down in front of the House of Treason today demanding the unelected, vile, anti-British Zionist puppet, Sunak, and his fag end of a term ‘government’ do the decent thing at long last and stop selling the continual international law defying Zionist bandit state British arms.
Credit where credit is due to these decent REAL Jews. Presumably they come from the Neturei Karta group.
https://www.facebook.com/netureikarta2021
If Rabbi Elhanan Beck of Stamford Hill, North London, is there as he might be since he attends a lot of these demonstrations can he have a few words with that idiot Starmer since the cretin doesn’t understand that there is a difference between Judaism and Zionism.
LikeLike
The heading “DAVID ICKE IN 1997” in the tweet posted by DSSJ and reproduced by you is false. That video was made in 2009 and the system tried to use it to vilify David Icke by issuing a stupid and useless “fact-checking” article written by some moronic Indian scribbler who probably does not even exist.
https://factly.in/this-2009-david-icke-video-does-not-predict-the-present-situation-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-he-was-talking-in-the-context-of-the-2009-swine-flu/
The article admits that David Icke is talking about the “Swine Flu” of 2009 and not about Covid. HOWEVER, everything he said/predicted turned out to be TRUE. Icke is talking about what would be the response of the authorities to a new pandemic and EVERYTHING he said then became real in 2020.
Another detail that proves how vile the “fact-checking” article was/is and how desperate they were to smear and silence David Icke, is the fact that they inserted a paragraph saying:
“David Icke had promoted several unsubstantiated conspiracy theories on social media. He is banned from Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter for spreading misinformation on COVID-19. Hence, the claim made in the post is MISLEADING.”
Who defines what is “misinformation”? The same people who define what is “hate speech”. In other words, the Establishment. I rest my case.
LikeLike
Claudius:
Thank you.
LikeLike
A little bit of British humour at its best:
LikeLike
Claudius:
Thank you. The 1970s, a time when, in the UK, pretty much anything (not amounting to incitement of various kinds) could be said without some malicious person or organization trying to get the police involved (the “Clown” Prosecution “Service” had not yet come into existence at that time). If anyone was “offended” (or pretended to be) by silly humour or anything else, the “offended” person either shut up and put up with it, or wrote a letter to a newspaper, or wrote an article somewhere.
In the 1970s, society in the UK had its flaws and its problems, certainly, but had not as yet gone completely mad. There was relatively little box-ticking, relatively little “jumping through hoops”, no-one (except the odd Royal Family fan) was silly enough to “clap like a seal” in the way seen in 2020-2022, and “terrorism” consisted of people like the I.R.A. shooting people and setting off bombs, not English people placing stickers on walls, or publishing the offline equivalent of a blog such as this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good morning Ian!
Yes, you are right. Here we have been spared the horrendous “political correctness” that has ruined the UK and the USA. To be precise it exists here but in a much milder form and it started about 20 years ago. Luckily we are made of much stronger stuff than the Anglo-Saxons. We resist and laugh at things like that. For example, a few years ago the government tried to impose the so-called “inclusive ” language and it was a colossal failure.
I think there is something in the make-up of us, Latin peoples, to instinctively reject any form of regulations. Having said that, it also has its negative aspects, but in this case, it served us well. An Italian friend of mine said to me: “We (Italians) have an instinctive mistrust of any kind of authority and that is why Italian society is so chaotic, but, at the same time, so good. Most of us do not believe what the media or the government say.”
LikeLike
Claudius:
I think that you may be right. In the past, 1970s for example, I would shake my head at the apparently chaotic state of various Latin countries: Italy, some South American states etc. I am more typical of the English and other Germanic peoples, I suppose.
That was then. Now, I see the nonsense that “our” governments impose (the political correctness, the contrived nonsense of the race/ethnicity question, not to mention the “Covid” panicdemic/scamdemic) and the way that nothing in the UK works properly any more, and see the sheep mostly going along with it, and think that a little “Latin” anarchy or rebelliousness might not be such a bad thing, at least until we can get a real British government again.
LikeLike
On the contrary, too many Brits were law disobeying, selfish, self-serving scum during the pandemic and didn’t care their idiocy/selfishness put vulnerable people at risk of ill health and no doubt killed some of these fellow citizens.
Not that the police really bothered to enforce the regulations under the now libertarian loony NOT REAL ‘party of law and order’.
These people who acted in that way should be grateful they live in such a liberal and degenerate ‘country’ and not one where the government took decisive action to punish transgressors of the law during the pandemic like well-governed Singapore.
These people in Britain could hardly have acted in a way less fitting to a nation which is of Northern European/Germanic origins.
If I had my way we would be having a lockdown every year just as an annual training exercise for a now degenerate ‘nation’ badly in need of some self-discipline standards to be apparent again as came naturally to 99% of Britons before degenerate liberal values first started to take hold here with predictable ill effects in the 1960’s.
LikeLike
John:
As so often noted before, we disagree on the whole “pandemic”/”panicdemic” thing, and I think that most people now understand that the whole scare was hugely overdone, partly deliberately.
As to your idea of having a “lockdown” annually, not only would that be reminiscent of somewhere like North Korea, but also would push the UK economy even further into the mire, with consequent effects on living standards and public services. Forcing people to do something like that, especially when many of us know how pointless it is even when there *is* a health scare, has nothing to do with “self-discipline”, but is an incident of petty tyranny.
LikeLike
Yes, that tweet showing New Labour Mark 2 with added Israeli Zionist Likud Party figures laughing at police in Belgium suppressing freedom of speech should act as a warning to the electorate as to how tyrannical and disrespectful of our free speech ‘Labour’ will be office once they gain an easy general election ‘victory’ later this year or in January 2025.
Yes, the so-called Conservatives are utterly crap and have badly betrayed their own voters and this country but does anyone sensible REALLY think Zionist, “without qualification” Starmer and his globalist, anti-British posse would be any better?
Don’t vote Labour or Tory. That is like banging your head against a door and then expecting the next time you do it the result will be different.
It isn’t illegal to abstain from voting and increasingly more people do it. Only the very old who think Churchill is still leader of the Conservative Party or Clement Attlee is Labour’s leader think it is shameful to not participate in elections.
At any rate, the Tories will lose the forthcoming inherently rigged general ‘election’ merely through their 2019 voters not turning-up as recent parliamentary by-elections demonstrate very well so no one has to vote Labour to ‘get the Tories out’.
LikeLike