No need to talk of “terrorism”. This is just what happens when there are vast numbers of urban-living blacks in a certain geographical space;; think Port-au-Prince, American ghetto ‘hoods, African townships.
So far, on the “Islamist” side, we have had some outrages, true, but mostly lunatics and/or idiots stabbing random members of the public.
On the English (or what the msm are pleased to call the “far right”) side, there have merely been a few incidents caused by people with psychological problems, and also a few (contrived) “cases” involving young men (mostly young, mostly men) shooting their mouths off in pubs, talking about killing MPs etc, and storing items such as swords (!) and the odd shotgun or rifle. Such young men are now mostly stuck in prison for years, for having done nothing but a display of bravado. I doubt whether many, if any, would ever have actually carried out any actions of significance.
On the other hand, every year, dozens if not hundreds of Jews go from the UK to Israel, where they are taught the use of pistols, rifles, sub-machineguns, and “Krav Maga” (“dirty fighting” techniques, akin to what in Russia is called “Sambo”— nothing to do with blacks, incidentally; it is a contraction of “samo-oboronye” or “self-defence”).
The MOSSAD defector Ostrovsky [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Ostrovsky] wrote in his book By Way of Deception that MOSSAD maintains arms “slicks” (caches) in all countries (except the USA) where there are large Jewish populations. Presumably, there is no need for arms dumps in the USA, with its famously lax laws on the private holding of weapons and ammunition.
That must mean that MOSSAD (and its co-opted “British” Jews) maintain arms dumps in the UK as well.
Why do the police and MI5 not, apparently, give much attention to the above-noted menace? Is it because the Jews have embedded themselves and their influence too deeply in the police, legal professions, and politics (etc) in the UK?
I, on the other hand, suffer from what might be designated as “Long Socio-Political Frustration”…
Sadly, the State does not pay out disability benefit monies for socio-political frustration; if it did, I should be more wealthy than I am.
There has recently been a vituperative campaign against Maajid Nawaz, carried on mostly (as always…) by Jews. The Jews used to love him because he was seen by them as an anti-Islamist, and anti-“far right”) ex-Muslim or “moderate” (not anti-Jew) Muslim, and as an “anti-terror” publicist, but once he started to understand that the “panicdemic” is not about public health but about preparing the ground for a global police state (microchipped populations, total control over movement, politics, and even opinions), he became, inevitably, a target for the “useful idiots” of NWO/ZOG on Twitter etc.
I have no doubt that those with real power (behind the scenes) gave the necessary orders to bin him or “cancel” him.
The binning of Maajid Nawaz actually proves his point about the present UK wave of repression of opinion, a tendency that is posing as a “public health” and anti-“fake news” campaign.
Slowly, slowly catchee monkey…The end result desired by the secret cabals and ruling circles —a microchipped population— will not come about quickly, or jarringly, but in stages, so as to minimize resistance, especially violent or armed resistance.
That is what “they” like to do— impoverish independent thinkers and/or those who are the targets of a (((certain))) lobby…
In the days of Stalin, it was common for dissident scientists, artists, writers, or just “ordinary citizens”, as well as the politically-active, to be “cancelled” (as people now say) because they held the “wrong” (officially-unapproved) opinions. Some were simply forced into remote-area exile, or into low-status occupations; others were imprisoned, sent to labour camps, or shot. They were not allowed to travel internationally.
I never thought that a version (admittedly as yet a “velvet-glove” version) of a kind of Stalinism would be implemented in the UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere.
There certainly is a “pandemic”, not of “Covid”, but of mass hypnotism and mass near panic.
“London’s worst tourist attraction’ closes this weekend after five months of ridicule
A top architect was paid a huge salary to lead the Marble Arch Mound project that flopped and cost taxpayers £6 million.
Elad Eisenstein was given £220,000 a year by Westminster City Council and resigned months after the artificial hill opened. He was paid more than the council’s chief executive.” [My London online news].
Every. Single. Time…
…and why do newspaper scribblers only have two qualifying words for architects, lawyers, doctors etc, i.e. “top”, and “disgraced” (sometimes both at once!)?
Late afternoon music
Late tweets seen
His pet ducks were “culled” (killed). Why? Human contact with wild birds in the UK is minimal.
Might be worth buying a few hundred copies— not to read, of course, but if you happen to live in a flat with noisy neighbours! Make a wall of noise insulation from them.
cf. the “holocaust” farrago, particularly the “gas chambers” fable.
You could compare the 2020-2021 “panicdemic” or “scamdemic” to the post-2008 “austerity” nonsense imposed by part-Jews David Cameron-Levita and George Osborne (with, once again, a general lack of opposition from “Labour”): a cynical propaganda campaign by the System, allied in that instance to a modern version of the late-Roman cruelty whereby the deluded citizens watched, in this case from 2008-2019, the poorer citizens being, if you like, thrown to the lions.
The international Jew-Zionist lobby is trying to help the half-Jewess (and Israeli agent) Ghislaine Maxwell. It must be awkward for the screeching Jewish trolls on UK and US Twitter…just as the Janner paedophilia case was awkward for the former.
The puppets of the System think that they are very clever, but their cards have been marked, even if only by a small-ish minority so far.
Priti Patel is, in effect, herself a migrant-invader, saved from spending her life behind the counter of a Kampala grocery shop by Idi Amin… and the UK’s asylum system.
Once again, tweeter “@EternalEnglish” hits the target. The “democratic” pantomime is a Schauspiel for the credulous. “Boris” is now exposed for the useless barrel of lies that many, including me, have said for years that he is. We now see the start of the planned movement to replace him, either by Sunak or, should fake “Labour” somehow manage to recover electorally, by Jewish-lobby puppet Keir Starmer and his Shadow Cabinet composed of Labour Friends of Israel members.
Incidentally, I heard Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper on the radio a few days ago, and her horrible, hectoring, and primly/smugly certain, voice brought back the days of Blair and Brown, including Yvette Cooper’s expenses cheating (she was, with her husband, Ed Balls, and in simple terms, a fraudster), and her support for both mass immigration and repression of free speech. A truly horrible woman.
Quite. Read , eg, To Build a Castle, by the recently-deceased dissident, Bukovsky:
“The man whom the New York Times called “a hero of almost legendary proportions among the Soviet dissident movement”, Vladimir Bukovsky was expelled from Moscow University at 19 years of age, and by the time he was 35 had spent a total of twelve years in Soviet prisons, labor camps and psychiatric hospitals.
Mounting pressure in the West led to his release in 1976, when he was famously traded for the Chilean Communist leader Luis Corvalan. He then accepted an invitation to continue his interrupted biology studies at Cambridge University. His fame as a major irritant to the Soviet government was sealed with the publication of his powerful bestselling prison memoir To Build a Castle.
A masterful writer, whom Nabokov called “that courageous and precious man”, Bukovsky continued to write about life under totalitarianism. “The great truth was that it was not rifles, not tanks, and not atom bombs that created power,” he wrote. “Power depended upon public obedience, upon a will to submit.” He himself never offered that obedience or submission to totalitarian authority.
Bukovsky has used his acclaim to warn world leaders of continuing deceit and manipulation by Soviet leaders and their successors, up to and including President Putin. He recently said: “Having failed to finish off conclusively the communist system, we are now in danger of integrating the resulting monster into our world. It may not be called communism anymore, but it has retained many of its dangerous characteristics.” [Amazon UK]
Incidentally, don’t assume that the latter-day Soviet Union (1960s, 1970s, 1980s) was always “iron fist in iron glove”. Sometimes, as often in 2021 Britain, the glove was velvet.
I was told, in the early 1980s, of a person who, in the Moscow of the late 1970s, was a sort-of dissident, though not one that wrote anything; he also did not really want to get a regular (or any) job.
That person was investigated by the local militia (police) on a potential charge of “social parasitism”, which could land someone with up to 5 years serf-labour (in effect) in regions such as Siberia, or beyond the Arctic Circle. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitism_(social_offense).
Eventually, the local militia chief summoned the young man to a meeting. The young (20-something) self-styled dissident was given a way out: to take a very poorly-paid job (I think as a night-watchman), part-time (I believe three nights per week). He could then loaf, or take part in harmless “dissident” discussions etc, for the other 4 days of the week. That way, also, the militia could be seen to have done its job, and the KGB (Fifth Chief Directorate and/or Second Chief Directorate) need not get involved.
Is that not what happens in the UK now? Politically active persons can tweet or blog (unless “deplatformed”), or even meet in person, up to a point. If some whining, or loudly complaining, Jew-Zionist body such as the “Campaign Against Anti-Semitism” [“CAA”] or “Community Security Trust” [“CST”] makes malicious complaint to the police, the police mess around slightly with the “dissident”, insist on a pointless interview under caution etc, with the aim of firing a shot across the bows.
Those who dissent more, or more actively, may find themselves being prosecuted, or perhaps even harassed by the “Anti-Terrorist Command”, but such cases are only the tip of the iceberg; many others are quietly and even politely repressed, just enough to “control” the dissident…
Useless barrel of lies; he should be [redacted]…
That useless barrel of lies was put where he is by System operatives far higher than he is; and he will be binned and replaced when the same secret cabals, or ruling circles, make that decision.
Police urgently arrive because a lady hung a flag inside her home?! I bet if you were to call about suspicious-looking prowlers, the plods would not even send anyone.
I wonder whether the police would have attended had the lady in question hung an Israeli flag in her house? We know the answer: no. In fact, the complaining neighbour might well have been arrested for something absurd, some non-crime, based on supposed “anti-Semitism”.
As for the venomous “neighbour” herself, she (it must be a woman, surely) seems to be Snoop Central. Not very likely to be Jewish (in Swindon!), but just another brainwashed idiot or “antifa” “useful idiot”, I expect.
All we need now is for someone like the snooping neighbour to proclaim that the Swastika cannot be flown or hung because “Britain is a free country” and/or “the War was fought for ‘freedom’“. Yeah, right…
“I’ve seen nothing in this variant that warrants Britain’s extreme response to it: Dr ANGELIQUE COETZEE, the doctor who alerted the world to the Omicron Covid variant, says we are over-reacting to the threat” [Daily Mail].
“As chair of the South African Medical Association and a GP of 33 years’ standing, I have seen a lot over my medical career.
But nothing has prepared me for the extraordinary global reaction that met my announcement this week that I had seen a young man in my surgery who had a case of Covid that turned out to be the Omicron variant.
This version of the virus had been circulating in southern Africa for some time, having been previously identified in Botswana.
But given my public-facing role, by announcing its presence in my own patient, I unwittingly brought it to global attention.
Quite simply, I have been stunned at the response – and especially from Britain.
And let me be clear: nothing I have seen about this new variant warrants the extreme action the UK government has taken in response to it.
No one here in South Africa is known to have been hospitalised with the Omicron variant, nor is anyone here believed to have fallen seriously ill with it.” [Daily Mail]
An excuse to keep the fear propaganda going.
Good. Now we can stop wasting time and money on those ridiculous places. Most of what is given is misdirected anyway.
I myself lived for a while on a small Caribbean island, a British Overseas Territory (formerly —and at least equally-accurately— called a “British Dependent Territory”), in receipt of British aid: defence aid and naval patrols, and other aid. The “other aid”, when I was there (over 20 years ago) consisted partly of a new prison, a new court building, and a (then novel) online companies registry, so that people in the UK, USA etc could set up offshore companies and trusts; Britain also subsidized the island government.
Meanwhile, said island had very poor schools, a very poor hospital, and was generally ramshackle.
For me, the whole set-up was bizarre. That island had a population, actually resident on the island, of about 8,000 (officially, about 10,000). Despite its Lilliputian size, both demographically (smaller than Henley-on-Thames) and geographically, the island had a British Governor living in Government House, and a local parliament with a Government and Opposition in the Westminster mould. The local “Government” consisted of about 8 people, the “Opposition” consisted of one person only, and there were ex-officio members too. About a baker’s dozen, all in all. All salaried, by the way.
British people needed a special visa to live on the island (including a medical certificate and a police check!), and needed special permission to buy property, but the islanders had unrestricted right to live and work in the UK!
I am all in favour, or would be, of the British Empire, but those days are long gone, sadly.
I imagine that the British Royal Family love the absurd “Commonwealth” for reasons of vanity.
The British Empire had a purpose, and in the 20th Century was a major force for the good in the world. The Commonwealth is just a near-meaningless rump, now, for which we pay, pointlessly.
Now outdated and pointless, though still a good spectacle.
Like the Trooping of the Colour, music from another age…
More tweets seen
There is no reason for the UK to confront Russia, which confrontation —militarily— might well be suicidal anyway. We need to join militarily with Russia (and mainland European states, once they are cleansed of Zionism) to eliminate both Zionism and Islamism, and to —eventually— create a Eurasian superculture standing as the alternative to both Americanism and Chinese expansionism.
This is Britain’s future, until or unless we create a new SS…
The only decent Greek political party, Golden Dawn, was repressed, as were its MPs; many are still in prison. So much for fake EU “democracy”…
I have already explained several times on this blog what is happening overall, in big-picture terms. There is a 33-year cycle operating. 1923. 1956. 1989. Now 2022. The agenda for the next 33 years, particularly, is being set. The transnational NWO/ZOG conspiracy (or “consensus” of the wealthy and powerful of the West) wants to implement a biosecurity police state, and at the same time to impoverish the many (especially in the more advanced countries) to enrich the already absurdly wealthy.
What does it take to wake people up?! At the same time as “useful idiots” follow little Greta Nut etc in demanding that European people stop using cars, or stop heating their homes, a few ultra-wealthy parasites or exploiters (Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Richard Branson, Elon Musk) are competing to build various spacecraft to be used for vanity and pleasure! Oh, and the msm all applaud!
A few relevant cartoons about the facemask nonsense
BBC Radio 4 PM
Had to drive somewhere after 1700 hrs, so tuned in to the BBC Radio 4 PM show. Jesus Christ! What a bore! It really has become quite as unlistenable as BBC TV News and Sky News have become unwatchable. Covid, Covid, Covid, Omicron, Covid (in short). Droning supposed “experts”, not one of which made the point that (as far as can be seen at present) “Omicron”, if caught or contracted by someone, merely gives the infectee a mild cold! For that, this crazed government has “mandated” more facemask nonsense, and may do more!
The other craziness on PM was around the “vaccine”, with the government spending yet more tens of billions on the —seemingly ineffective— “booster shots” etc. The whole thing is just mad.
That ghastly smug little creature who presents PM has obviously decided (or been told) to take “Omicron” at the government’s valuation. No real analysis, or cost/benefit analysis.
Half an hour wasted. I should have switched to Radio 3.
More tweets seen
Dim and unpleasant Andrew Windsor having fun…with Israeli Intelligence asset, Ghislaine “Maxwell”, looking on as the cameras roll…
If only such people as those tweeters were able to overcome brainwashing and mental limits, and to realize that what they really want is social-nationalism, at root.
While I oppose the death penalty, as such, a future real British government will have to clear the streets, and if that means firing squads in city squares, to eliminate untermenschen, then so be it.
The tame thick princeling lives in a bubble of privilege. He has no right to speak, certainly none to be taken seriously.
The NHS, for all its virtues, is too often shambolic, maladministered, and filthy.
I have not watched much of the Budget coverage. Talking heads and/or “journalists” (System propagandists) yapping ignorantly and, all the while, smug MP or ex-MP freeloaders (such as David Gauke) seen on Sky TV or BBC talking about “wasting government money” etc (when Gauke himself —among many many others— claimed for everything he could, including tacky furnishings, TV sets, luxury hotel stays etc).
What a bunch of monkeys!
This Government has, of course “wasted money” (UK’s economic resources): £37 BILLION on the ludicrous “test and trace” nonsense alone, headed by incompetent crony Dido Harding. Something that was not even necessary in the first place. That’s more than the projected cost of even the HS2 vanity-rail white elephant.
Imagine what other could have been done with £37BN. Improving the whole rail infrastructure of the country. New hospitals. Libraries, or education generally (I mean real education, not warehousing children in schools, “taught” by ignorant teachers —very often— while the parents work, or jump through bureaucratic hoops).
£37BN works out at around £1,000 for every working-age adult in the UK. In other words, the Treasury could just have given every person in the UK about £1,000, with better results socially and economically.
To put it another way, the most expensive aircraft carrier ever built, the USS Ford, cost about £9 Billion in pounds sterling, so the UK could have had (disregarding running costs) four like that, instead of the useless, pointless, “test and trace” fiasco. Or might have had built about 37 smaller warships.
When you see that part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer, “Boris”, posing as Prime Minister (forget Indian “clever boy”, Rishi Sunak, and the other clowns), you know that the UK political system is terminally sick.
“Criticized“? Yes, but we have seen in recent years what frightens the corrupt and the conspirators, and it is not being “criticized” in official reports.
The “Thalidomide” of our times?
Yesterday, the hugely ignorant Daily Mirror scribbler, Susie Boniface, aka “the Fleet Street Fox” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susie_Boniface] suggested, in a Mirror opinion piece, that “anti-vaxx” protesters should be imprisoned, and generally treated as terrorists. From where did that come? At any rate, an interesting straw in the wind as we approach 2022, the most significant year since 1989 (and, previously, 1956 and 1923). 33-year cycle.
How long before anyone questioning the System narrative and System policies is considered to be a “social terrorist” or “enabler”? Anyone who questions the “panicdemic” narrative. Anyone who opposes the cross-Channel or other migration-invasion. Anyone who questions the power or influence of the Jewish lobby. Anyone seeking a better society. Others…
You can see already the outline of what is taking shape. Look at the Online Harms Bill. Even less free speech than now exists. The Jewish (Zionist) lobby is behind much of the repression.
I wonder what our society will be like in a couple of hundred years if it continues on its present trajectory?
More tweets seen
Alarming that the most powerful military-destructive machine in the world is now controlled, at least notionally, by someone who appears to be a confused, semi-demented, and possibly incontinent person, who may or may not be some kind of child abuser. One can only hope that, if Biden tries to reprise Hilary’s idea, and launch a third world war against Russia (or China), that there is some American version of a chekist standing quietly behind him, pistol always ready to administer a quick coup de grace…
Exactly. UK streets are less safe year on year, but the repression of opinion, including online opinion, is intensifying with every passing year.
As the tweeter says, “wealthy“…perhaps in fact not “beyond the dreams of avarice” (let’s not set the bar too low!) but probably worth a couple of million anyway, including the detached house in a pleasant neighbourhood etc.
“It was not painful; didn’t hurt…” Obviously not sufficiently deterred…
What gives the idiots the right to stop other people moving freely? Some weird idea that their actions will force Government to make more house insulation mandatory, or to pay for that? The protesters’ whole premise is nonsense. There is obviously a hidden agenda here, but protesters such as that retired doctor are merely pawns in someone else’s game.
Too many people are waking up. Bring on the talking heads and scribblers such as Susie Boniface, Fleet Street Fox, to call for the imprisonment of dissidents.
Note the police robots standing behind the “protester” (para-terrorist), not stopping him, not arresting him, nor even talking to him; in fact, looking “as if” they are protecting him…
In fact, the police car in that picture is also blocking the road.
Come to think of it, I have seen nothing from Susie Boniface, “Fleet Street Fox”, about treating “Insulate Britain” or Extinction Rebellion as “terrorists”. She may perhaps have done so (I tend to avoid reading her ignorant drivel), but I have anyway not seen it.
I remember watching this, as a boy of 14-15, in black and white (it was made in colour but I had my own huge and ancient b&w TV, with wooden case, and made, I should think, in the 1950s).
Looking at what little is on YouTube, and what (also not much) I can now recall, it is interesting to see the differences between the 1971 view of the near future (The Guardians was set in the 1980s) and what actually happened in the 1980s and on to 2021, 50 years after the 13 episodes of the series were shown.
There may have been those, in the early 1980s, amid the Miners’ Strike etc, who found parallels (the early paramilitarization of some police, and the use of SAS soldiers dressed as police).
Looking back now, one still finds parallels, but also great differences. The first is the relative quiescence of the public now. No, or very few, violent demonstrations, few big marches (and even fewer violent ones) compared to the 1970s.
Now, we have the Internet, and all its issues. That was not a factor, for the public, until the mid-1990s at earliest. The authorities have far wider powers in practice now, and use them.
In 1971, the “Guardian” force was seen as paramilitary, but in 2021 the forces of repression use plainclothes operatives (mostly), and not decrees (as such) but “laws” nodded through by a rubberstamp Parliament— look at the Online Harms Bill being put through Parliament right now, and with no resistance at all from a useless “Opposition” led by a Jewish-lobby puppet.
Also, 1971 people would not have taken seriously the idea that a virus which (supposedly) kills about 1 in 1,000 of the population would enable the UK Government to impose wide-ranging curbs on the most basic civil liberties (eg freedom to travel —even by car— in 2020); or that the kind of people who were most likely to resist actively in 1971 would become, in 2021, virtue-signalling “we’re good citizens, we are” serfs.
Interesting short documentary about the Afrika Korps in Libya and French Equatorial Africa (now, Chad, in part) in the early 1940s
My feeling was that Labour would lose, and quite possibly come third. I was not correct. Labour won narrowly or, as they say on the racecourse, “by a neck, cleverly”.
Labour got a vote-share of 35.3%. The Conservative candidate got 34.4%. George Galloway, under the banner of the Workers’ Party, did better than many expected (21.9%); I got that right, at least.
All other candidates, 13 in number, lost their deposits: LibDems 3.3%; Yorkshire Party 2.2%; 10 of the other 11 received vote-shares below half of one percent each. UKIP, on 0.4%, just beat the Monster Raving Loony (0.3%).
The English Democrats, whose candidate, Therese Hirst, wrote to my blog comments page to request a mention on this blog, came 6th, with 0.55%.
The small and supposedly “nationalist” parties were, as expected, an embarrassment.
The For Britain party leader, Anne Marie Waters, got 0.3% (97 votes). Jayda Fransen did even worse, though (like Ms. Waters) on a par with her previous forays into doomed electioneering: 0.1% (50 votes). [nb. percentages approximate].
So where to start? Firstly, by noting that the Labour Party’s winning candidate, on 35.3%, not only did worse than any previous Labour candidate in the constituency but also worse than the winning Conservative Party candidate in the first election held for the seat, in 1983 (39.6%).
Leaving aside the rigged 2016 by-election, Labour has gone down steadily in the constituency since 2017: 55.5%, 42.7%, 35.3%.
This does not somehow “save Labour”. The present Government still has a Commons majority of 80, and could in theory be in place until December 2024. Labour still has very little likelihood of being able to form even a minority government after that time. If Scotland were to pull away from the UK, Labour would be in permanent and declining Opposition; even without that, Labour has no future as a party of government.
Other points: Labour and Kim Leadbeater ran a very dishonest campaign, even delivering contradictory leaflets to different streets (depending on the race/nationality of the inhabitants). She evaded the issue of the schoolteacher driven from his home and job by Islamist zealots, for example.
The new MP is already on BBC Radio 4 Today Programme yapping about “people living side by side“, diversity etc etc. Another puppet MP. Useless for the people who elected her.
As for Batley’s chances of getting central government assistance now, forget it. The locals must be a pretty stupid lot. They have elected a communitarian drone whose economic knowledge stops at spouting nonsense about “magic money trees”…
The Conservatives ran a lily-livered campaign, which seemed cunning but ultimately fell flat. The candidate deliberately shunned publicity (I thought, though I am judging from hundreds of miles away). The noise was all about Kim Leadbeater and George Galloway.
I thought that Galloway might get more than 20%, and I was right in that. 21.9%. He must be pleased with such a result.
As far as social nationalism is concerned, there was no social-national candidate, just absurd one-trick-pony candidates playing at politics. Anne Marie Waters and, even less credible, Jayda Fransen.
Labour continues to be the party of, mainly, the blacks and browns, publicly-paid employees and a few other groups. It is less than ever the party of (most of) the white English.
Other points? Well, the pathetic LibDem result was par for the course. Since the 2010 upsurge, the LibDems have lost their deposits in all Westminster elections contested by them at Batley and Spen.
Turnout, at 47.6%, was not especially low for a by-election.
About 73% of those who voted, voted for a System party. Over half of those eligible to vote abstained from voting. So about two-thirds of the entire eligible electorate either voted non-System, or decided not to vote at all.
Good luck to the residents of #BatleyAndSpen you’re going to need it. The sh!t hole you’ve all been complaining about will unfortunately remain one or become worse. Voting the #labourparty AGAIN!! is a disaster. 🤷🏼♀️
A tweet which shows not only how out of touch many Twitter-twits are (where has she been since 2010? Was she in outer space in 2019?), but how mutually-isolated are different socio-political “tribes” in the UK.
Good point. Until the seat is abolished, the Batley and Spen electorate will be represented at Parliament by a communitarian System drone with not an interesting or original thought in her head, dragging down £200,000 p.a. in pay and expenses, and accomplishing nothing, while the voters of Batley moulder in poverty and despair.
When Starmer, Nandy and Rayner signed the Articles of Surrender to the Murdoch/Tory/Zionists The media lies bombardment ended. They kissed the Chief Rabbi's ring. The Labour Palestine justice resistance fights on. 8,000 of them in Batley. https://t.co/ntOvgh0IRf
Political joke Paul Mason opines…in fact, he is right about the two “leaders” that he mentions in his tweet. Social nationalism in terms of electoral politics is scarcely even a bad joke; The two ladies together got only 147 votes at the Batley and Spen by-election, scarcely 0.3% of the total vote. One vote for about every 300 cast. Embarrassing.
Mason is not right about “terror networks” of what he would call, no doubt, “the far right”. They do not even exist, as far as I know anyway. Young men buying samurai swords, young women having swastika-shaped cookie-cutters, and people talking big in pubs, do not constitute a “terror threat”…
As for Mason’s “danger…online“, what he means is that people might be able to persuade other people to a certain viewpoint online. Mason hates free speech, so calls that a “danger”…
“John Smith” gives an accurate, if ungrammatical, riposte to sex pest communitarian grasper Brendan Cox, who thinks that it is worth trashing the UK if a few blacks become England-team footballers.
More tweets seen
The “panicdemic” is such an exercise in applied psychology that dictators, oppressive political regimes, and academic scribblers will probably be using its lessons for decades, and maybe for hundreds of years, rather like the 20thC Chinese techniques called (I believe) hsi nao, or “wash brain”, taken up by the West since the Korean War as “brainwashing”: see the 1963 book, Techniques of Persuasion, by J.A.C. Brown. I once had a copy, bought by me at my school book fair in, I think, 1971.
Such techniques were intriguing to film-makers, and have continued to be. Early examples would include The Manchurian Candidate and The Ipcress File.
Those films focussed on individual subjects, but there is of course “brainwashing” or, more accurately, “conditioning”, of whole masses of people, whether at schools (Eton might be a good example), or during Army training, to take two obvious situations.
Recent studies have concluded that, if people are exposed to fear propaganda for months, they lose the ability to resist it even if logical, rational and credible counter-messages are then delivered to them. Put simply, emotion trumps thought, usually.
Think back to the initial panic about “the virus”, in early Spring, 2020. TV news showing shuttered towns in Italy and elsewhere, the population only allowed to take walks alone or as couples, not interacting with others at all. Curfews. Harsh methods of enforcement (particularly in the part of China where the virus supposedly just appeared as if out of nowhere).
In the UK, we have seen how even the shambolic government regime presided over by Boris-idiot applied ever-stricter laws, “rules”, “guidance” etc (which the police enforced as if all had the force of law).
Police chiefs wanting to check people’s shopping to see whether the items had been “reasonable” purchases! That caused a kefuffle because the regime had tried to impose such repression too early, before the fear propaganda had fully taken hold.
Other examples included police vandalizing beauty spots in the Peak District lest people walk to them, other police (the hopeless police of Derbyshire were arguably the worst) using drones and loudhailers to bully elderly couples walking on the hills, miles from anywhere; in Wales, some farmer and his wife, hysterical (and again calling police) because two people from elsewhere were camping overnight on a nearby hill! “They might spread Covid!“, the pathetic idiots cried and whined (to the newspaper and TV reporters who were, unmolested, also there!).
Shops and other businesses were closed down for months, the employees’ anger largely forestalled or bought off by “furlough” payments. Result: the UK has spent £300 BILLION.
It is said “no matter, interest rates are almost zero”. In that case, why did the UK governments of the part-Jews David Cameron-Levita, Theresa May, and “Boris” Johnson apply so-called “austerity” for a decade, causing a huge amount of misery, in order to “save” far less than the sums now wasted for no good reason? Why was a huge investment in infrastructure not undertaken? Instead, vast amounts have been spent on paying the population to sit at home eating delivered pizza, watching TV, and drinking.
Then came the facemask nonsense. Large-scale trials which showed that facemasks (except the kind used in laboratories) were of minimal utility (and also caused other health problems) were ignored. The Government mandated facemasks (often little more than cloth muzzles or quasi-scarfs) in shops etc. Mandated them on pain of a heavy fine.
At first, up to mid-2020, both the UK Government and the World Health Organization [WHO] disparaged the use of facemasks, but later came under political pressure to change their advice, which is what happened.
The World Economic Forum [WEF] openly proclaimed how wonderful the “panicdemic” was as a driver to start a “Great Reset” of the world.
Well, now we are 18 months on, and the UK public, at least the majority, have shown themselves to be malleable pawns, without any regard for the freedoms won over centuries. One sees many wearing their facemasks even in their own cars, or while walking on windswept clifftops etc. Do they know that they have been brainwashed? Do they even care?
I think that it was the popular music group, Pink Floyd, in the early 1970s, maybe on Dark Side of the Moon, who had a track in which they sang that “…quiet desperation is the English way“. That might have to be changed, these days, to something like “spineless compliance, and apathy, is the English way”…
Meanwhile, we hear that 50,000 or 60,000 people have died in the UK “within 28 days of a positive test” (until recently, it was “from Covid”…), though (what a shock…) apparently no-one at all has died of flu for 18 months in the UK! Incidentally, if someone “tests positive” (often because the tests are flawed), even if having no symptoms, then weeks later dies in a car crash…yes, that’s right…that person “dies within 28 days of a positive test”!
The brainwashed nature of the population can be seen in the relative lack of anger or even questioning at the incongruity. Suddenly, instead of tens of thousands of deaths from influenza etc, there is substituted “deaths from Covid”, but most people are still, even now, obeying the so-called “laws”, “rules” etc. Even though their rational minds must know that this is a kind of scam on a vast scale.
Again, every day now we are seeing such as “today, 20,000 people tested positive”, followed by “and three people died within 28 days…(etc)”
In the UK, the msm has been totally compliant to the wishes of the State. In the msm and the “corridors of power”, only a few independent minds have stood up against the propaganda lies. Peter Hitchens [on Twitter as @clarkemicah] was one. Former Law Lord, Jonathan Sumption, was another. See https://twitter.com/SumptionUpdates.
About 1 out of 1,000 in the UK has died supposedly “of” or “with” or “within 28 days of a test”. Some people claim, speciously, 1 out of 500. Even so, this was never a nation-breaking pandemic. In the wider world, about 1 person has died out of every 4,000 people.
Inmates at the American concentration camp at Guantanamo were forced to wear facemasks nearly 20 years ago. To break them, not to save them from infection. Think about it.
We are facing an attempt, starting in 2022, to implement a new stage of the New World Order conspiracy. Various campaigns are part of that: Covid-19 “measures”, “Black Lives Matter” nonsense, fake “environmental” measures, “anti-racism” campaigns etc.