Morning music

Thoughts about “two-tier Keir”, two-tier “justice” etc
I often look at local newspapers online. Sometimes, you can get a better idea of where UK society is from those sources than you do from the national Press.
I just saw a few reports in the local Press, from several places in the south of England, which must surely stagger anyone who has observed the almost Stalinist sentences recently handed down to those who have been involved directly or indirectly in the recent protests or so-called “riots”.
Example: a mixed-race individual described as “a powerful thug” lost his jacket in a bar. He demanded that the barman find it. He then punched the barman and, despite other staff intervening, did so again. Door staff detained him after a struggle, the police arrived, and he then punched a policeman in the face. Previous offences of violence. Result? Non-custodial sentence.
Another example? “Traveller” (Irish tinker/”gypsy”) took police on a high-speed chase in a van. Much damage done, and some injury to members of the public. Tried to run off after he crashed. Uninsured. No driving licence. Multiple previous convictions. Result? Non-custodial sentence.
The recent sentencing for “political” or quasi-political “crimes” has mostly been a disgrace, and has actually shown up the System politicians, notably “two-tier” Keir, as being not strong (as they try to project) but fearful, and the System itself as brittle, without much resilience.
Incidentally, I was just thinking about that time, related in the New Testament, when Jesus Christ overturned the tables of the Jew moneychangers and did other “rebellious” actions, and scourged the moneychangers (at least symbolically):
“In the narrative, Jesus is stated to have visited the Temple in Jerusalem, where the courtyard was described as being filled with livestock, merchants, and the tables of the money changers, who changed the standard Greek and Roman money for Jewish and Tyrian shekels.[6] Jerusalem was packed with Jews who had come for Passover, perhaps numbering 300,000 to 400,000 pilgrims.[7][8]
And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers’ money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father’s house a house of merchandise.
— John 2:15–16, King James Version[9]
And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.
— Matthew 21:12–13, King James Version[10]“
[Wikipedia]
Now obviously the motivation of Jesus Christ was not the same as those “rioting” or protesting in the UK recently, but it could yet be described as “ideological” and/or “rebellious”, and certainly His actions were not that different from those of some of the recent defendants sentenced to imprisonment for having shouted insulting words, overturned cars, assaulted policemen and others etc.
Admittedly, one cannot imagine Jesus Christ looting a sausage-roll shop…
Worth thinking about, anyway.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleansing_of_the_Temple
I nearly forgot to add that the said “tinker”, mentioned above, was sentenced to a non-custodial sentence partly because “he had to support” (I wonder how, exactly?) no less than 7 children, with another expected shortly.
Tweets seen
Meanwhile, every single year, many millions more “migrants” (migrant-invaders) flood into Europe. A million or so or them end up invading Britain (whether as “legals” or “illegals”, often posing as permitted entrants (“fiancees”, “spouses”, “students”, workers with work visas, “tourists” etc). Many just disappear into “the community” once here.
That Usherwood individual, formerly Political Editor at LBC radio (owned by Jewish Zionists) seems to have been tied up with the noisier parts of the Jew-Zionist lobby, such as the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”]. He has an agenda, in my opinion.
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1827465762249789745
At time of blogging, the situation remains unclear.
So looks as though the attack failed. This time.

I have been reading The View from the Foothills: the Diaries of Chris Mullins [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Mullin_(politician)], published in 2009.
In an entry from a date in 2000, Mullins (appointed a junior minister under Blair) notes that one major problem with housing provision is that “most of the private rental housing has been soaked up by asylum seekers“.
In 2000! 24 years ago!
Some political nitwits, though, still do not seem to understand the basic facts, as seen with former MP, Sajid Javid:

Not entirely accurate, though not completely wrong either.
National identities across Europe developed, out of existing identities, in the earliest years of the 5th Post-Atlantean Age, that is, roughly, from 1400 AD.
Prior to that, someone might hold feudal power in more than one part of Europe, as the Plantagenet kings held sway in both England and parts of France.
The Renaissance recapitulated in a new way the 4th Post-Atantean Age (the Greco-Roman), and that 5th Age was at its beginning then. Joan of Arc was one major manifestation.
Once national identity strengthened, feudalism, with its system of fealty crossing other boundaries, waned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fealty.
In England, the influences of the new form of identity, national identity stricto sensu, slowly developed from that time. The Renaissance was slightly delayed in coming to England, having originated in Italy. Later, in the Tudor period (i.e. from 1485), a greater sense of national identity grew, but the same or similar was happening all over Europe, and had already started to happen in Switzerland, particularly.
So Caroline Lucas, though wrong in the specifics (the Tudors did not “invent” English national identity), is not totally wrong inasmuch as that identity, as we now understand it, was to a large extent initially the product of the Tudor period.
More tweets
That is not my idea of a police Chief Superintendent, either.

Instead of Angela Merkel’s head, it should have that of either Yvette Cooper or Zoe Gardner (other candidates are available).
Talking points


More tweets
Late tweets
The truth is that the “authorities” are afraid of the blacks. They know that, were this ridiculous and out-of-place “festival” to be prohibited, the blacks would go *** —what’s the phrase?— well, let’s just say they would get angry. As in burn down London angry. As in destroy Notting Hill angry. Therefore, the Notting Hill Carnival will be an annual nuisance until Britain has a proper government and society.
I tend to agree. Not everyone who has a bicycle, obviously, but the members of the Lycra clothing/silly cap/2-wheel death squad brigade.
That might be just a way of preventing the Kiev regime from redeploying some forces to the Kursk incursion. We shall see.
Late music

Hello Ian! Lots of intersting things in your blog today!
When the f… will the Brits and Germans wake up and start fighting back? [REDACTED]. After all these horrendous killings and stabbings NOT ONE [REDACTED]! If [REDACTED] the day after the attacks things would change rapidly.
LikeLike
Claudius:
Regret that that comment had to be rather heavily redacted now that the UK is a germinal police state.
LikeLike
I understand, you can delete it because it does not make much sense now 😁😁😁
Talking about the English national consciousness I agree with you. Things like that cannot be “invented”, that is a ridiculous concept. However, it was there waiting to be articulated. I think that Shakespeare´s “Henry V” is the best and most beautiful example of that. The famous speech before the battle sums up that feeling perfectly. BTW, Kenneth Branagh´s version is FAR superior to Lawrence Olivier´s. I always believed that the latter has been greatly overrated.
LikeLike
Claudius:
Just watched that. Very good. It is a more naturalistic version than the perhaps more famous 1944 Olivier version. I like both. Perhaps I am just more accustomed to the earlier version.
As to the redaction, again regrets, but anything that might be taken as “incitement”, even at second hand, cannot be published on the blog. The “you know who(s)” are just waiting for a chance to make malicious complaint to the UK police (poundshop Stasi) again. A horrible tribe.
LikeLike
I fully understand. I should know better, but my terrible temper usually gets the better of me (or perhaps the worst…) 😁😁😁
LikeLike
Claudius:
No matter. It just becomes a rather boring chore to have to explain both law and history to the local police.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunately, for decades the (((evil tribe))) has been (((brainwashing))) Europeans into hating themselves and believing that it is wrong to want to exist.
A huge percentage of our people are so heavily (((brainwashed))) that they no longer care about the survival of the White race.
The systematic (((brainwashing))) of White people into self-hatred is the worst crime against humanity in human history.
White people ARE starting to wake up, as the recent Very Peaceful Protests (I refuse to call them riots) in England showed.
That is why the (((system))) panicked and cracked down hard on the protestors, putting them in prison.
The (((evil tribe))) and (((their))) enforcers are desperate to intimidate White people into submission long enough for the (((demographic replacement))) to be completed and White people turned into an oppressed minority in all formerly White countries.
I hope that White people in England and everywhere will refuse to be intimidated by the (((evil tribe))).
If White people unite to stand up for White interests, the (((evil tribe))) will be defeated.
(((They))) can’t put everyone in prison.
If enough White people stand up and refuse to be intimidated, it will overwhelm the (((system))).
LikeLike
Hello. I do agree with you, of course. However, I am quite sure that the violence that occurred at some of the protests was engineered by the government, either using MI5 operatives or undercover police officers who infiltrated/manipulated groups of hooligans. It is quite obvious that such incidents would only benefit the government and justify the introduction of even harsher legislation against the real Britons (a.k.a. White people)
LikeLike
Here is a great clip by Katie Hopkins. She is 100% right on this matter.
LikeLike
I disagree with the statement that English national consciousness was largely invented by the Tudors.
Even long before that, there was a strong sense of English identity.
The English soldiers who fought against the invading Normans (and unfortunately lost) at the Battle of Hastings had a strong sense of English identity.
The English soldiers led by King Alfred The Great, who defeated the great heathen army and drove the Vikings out of England, had a strong sense of English identity.
Even much earlier, Boudicca and her followers who rebelled against the Romans had a strong sense of English identity.
The English identity has been around for thousands of years (at least).
I would surmise that the builders of Stonehenge had an English identity.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
While I appreciate what you say, I am not sure that Boadicea/Boudicca had an English identity, as such, that went beyond her tribal identity (the Iceni).
Alfred the Great was of course eventually the King of the Anglo-Saxons, and became known, long after his death, as the first King of England, despite not having had complete sway over quite large areas of the country.
The fragility of “English” identity is seen in the fact that the Danes/Vikings were seen as the “heathen army” by the Anglo-Saxons but, after about 150 years (of both settlement and continued invasion) Canute/Cnut became the accepted ruler of all England.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_the_Great
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cnut
I suppose that what *was* specifically English, in the misty past, is a question of both definition and context. What *is* English, now, in 2024, is more easily defined, of course, both ethnically and culturally.
LikeLiked by 1 person