If that were an Arab or other young person, who travelled from the UK to the Middle East to be trained in the use of weapons and explosives, not only would it be a tabloid newspaper story but, also, the “anti-terror” police and others would take an interest. Jewish? Israel? Oh, no problem…
The complacency of the police and others is incredible.
The MOSSAD defector, “Ostrovsky”, wrote in his book By Way of Deception (I read it in the USA when it was published in 1990) that MOSSAD and other elements of the Israeli state maintain arms caches in all foreign states where Jews live in any number, except the USA. I presume that ownership of weapons is so widespread in the USA that arms caches are unnecessary (or that the USA is thought to be completely under “their” control at Federal level). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Ostrovsky
This is as close to “preparation of acts of terror” as one could imagine without an actual proven operational plan: young Jews going to Israel and receiving such training (and/or “other” training?), arms caches prepared etc, yet nothing is done.
The Zionists are now embedded in the UK state and its institutions (police, MI5, MI6 etc), not to mention both Government (the Boris-idiot government being the most Zionist ever) and Opposition (Keir Starmer is just a Zionist monkey-on-a-stick).
Jewish-Zionist supremacism has to be dealt with in the UK once and for all.
Alison Chabloz, the persecuted singer-songwriter and satirist, has appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on a charge under the Public Order Act 1986.
When I first heard of the case, I realized that such a charge requires the approval of the Attorney-General. [“A-G”] It seems however, that PC Plod and the CPS do not know the law, because such approval was for some reason not sought before (should have been long before) the matter came to a court hearing.
I hear that, today in Court, retrospective or retroactive approval was sought! Really, the nonsense should have been dismissed, but it seems that a 6-week adjournment has been granted in order that the personal approval of the A-G, as required by law, can be obtained.
The present A-G is Suella Braverman, whose appointment has been very heavily criticized in the past couple of years. She is of expatriate Indian origin, and apparently a Buddhist. She is believed to have a Jewish husband.
“After meeting with her…the Board of Deputies of British Jews said in a…statement that she is “not in any way antisemitic”, saying it believed that she did not “intentionally use antisemitic language”, while finding that she “is clearly a good friend of the Jewish community” [Wikipedia] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suella_Braverman
We shall have to wait and see whether this rather “unusual” case against Alison Chabloz receives the required approval of the Attorney-General, or not.
One wonders about the state of the police and CPS these days when they bring a case to court that requires the approval of the Attorney-General, and when the CPS has neither received nor even sought any such approval! What a waste of public money and court time! Is it a “pay peanuts get monkeys” scenario? I don’t know.
This country is so screwed now that only a social national revolution can save it.
I have more information, but will blog anon about the case (if it actually proceeds, which must be doubtful).
Alison’s blog: https://alisonchabloz.com/
[Update, 17 March 2022: The Attorney-General’s consent was not given, so the charges were reduced and changed to a level where consent was not necessary]
Reasonably correct but not, frankly, as good as what I have written on the same subject(s) in the last few years (on this blog). I wrote about faux-“revolutionary” Owen Jones a few times: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/04/a-brief-word-about-owen-jones/
…and Owen Jones has in the past tweeted about me:
He also tweeted to Jewish-lobby puppet John Woodcock (the former MP, who is now “lord” something or other) that he should block me on Twitter! Woodcock complied, immediately!
Owen Jones never sued me for libel, if he thought that I libelled him (admittedly, I am now all but “unsueable” by reason of impecuniosity). I wonder whether, after seeing Jones’s performance over the past few years, more people agree with my assessment?
£82K? And the rest (“expenses”, relatives “employed”, extra-mural “earners” etc in many cases; that may or not apply in this case).
Carolyn Harris MP [Labour, Swansea East]; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolyn_Harris.
She actually had the gall to criticize her critics!
A pretty obvious “deadhead MP”. I may even pen an assessment of her to add to my “Deadhead MPs” series.
29 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 17 March 2021”
Good afternoon Ian! Here is a little gem I received this morning:
Apart from a massively increased crime rate, a huge loss of social cohesion/sense of real of community which has helped to breed the incredible selfishness of libertarian extremists on Covid -19 like Peter Hitchens and that ghastly and very thick Tory mare, Julie Hartley-Brewer and our resultant shamefully high death rate what, exactly, have blacks brought this country?🙄🙄🙄
All too often their young men engage in rampant criminality even if they are highly paid like that footballer and they have a particular predilection towards raping women and stabbing people for no real reason as was proved in Stab City Upon The Thames AGAIN yesterday!🙄🙄🙄
I am normally opposed to the use of capital punishment for crimes like rape because I think it would be disproportionate even though rape is a serious offence and needs to be treated more harshly but then again how we do get it through to blacks and mostly muslims that rape and gang rapes especially are heinous crimes and they need to respect women?
It really is not surprising that the USA used to frequently execute blacks for rape as in Virginia which, sadly, looks likely to be the first Southern state to end the death penalty: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Virginia
I don’t think anyone should find it noteworthy why these Southern US states in particular (the Old Confederacy) but also the US as a whole clings to the death penalty. Yes, it S a form of modern day ‘lynching’ but then how else is the black crime rate in the US to be kept in some form of check?
You probably know, m’Lord of Essex, that in the old Viking law, rape was considered more serious than murder.
Yes, Zach, free the USA from the pernicious and disproportionate influence of the Zionist Israel First Lobby. It is utterly ridiculous that a country of over 300 million people is under the cosh of this powerful lobby when its adherents in that country form a tiny fraction – a mere 3% or less – of its population.
By freeing America from them, that will help ordinary Americans, the people of Palestine who are often unjustly oppressed by Israel and Britain too since our stupid governments are far too close to America in foreign policy terms and the existence of this lobby is one good reason we should distance ourselves from America in this area of governance.
That black rapist footballer looks to be a Somalian. Yes, no doubt the scummy, virulently anti-British, globalist, open borders supporting (even during a worldwide viral,pandemic!🙄🤬😡☹️😞) ‘Tories’ (in reality libertarian globalist capitalist extremists) let him in and consider him to be a fine example of ‘cultural enrichment’ and wondrous ‘diversity’.
Somalians, even when compared to other blacks, are the lowest of the low and are renowned for their criminal inclinations.🤬😡☹️😞
On the subject of black crime and its increasingly numerous incidences, I see there were some more black stabbing crimes in our former capital city yesterday.
I do love how these stories often appear when you put into Google’s search box the words London and stabbing or London and stabbings!
They have the strap line ‘Breaking News’!🙄🙄 No, REAL ‘Breaking News’ would be if there were a day or so when there WAS NOT a stabbing in ‘Stab City Upon The Thames’! 🙄🙄🙄🤬🤬🤬😡😡☹️☹️☹️😞😞
The Metropolitan Police are full of irony or they have a truely wonderful sense of humour! Their website/Twitter account says ‘Working For A Safer London’
How LONG have we got before that is even achieved on the levels of Berlin let alone Singapore, Monte Carlo or Tokyo?🙄
Well, I supposed me MAY get, eventually, to the promised land if the ‘party of law and order’🙄🙄🙄🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🙄🙄🙄🙄 actually allowed the police to police without tying them up in bundles of PC red tape and recruited many more of them instead of sacking them by the thousands!🙄🙄🙄
Get officers out onto the streets instead of being cooped-up inside stations sitting on their backsides looking at computers for mean non PC tweets!🙄
Executions to be immediately reintroduced for murders of prison officers during the course of their official duties, during escape attempts by inmates and for murders of their fellow prisoners.
Also, as a punishment for high treason and enabling the genocide of the native British via mass, continual, immigration policies which have no real form of public consent.
The globalist Tory traitors and others will swing for their crimes or be electrocuted in electric chairs borrowed from the USA!
I don’t see why Tory traitors and others should be given a relatively humane execution by a quintessentially British and therefore civilised long-drop hanging when they show by their actions they despise this country.. No, a more cruel ending is in order in the brutal American electric chair!
Like the USA more than your own country like these Tory traitors do and you will get a more uncivilised and less humane Yankee execution then!
Simples as the Meerkat would say!😂😂😂😎😎😎😄😄😄🤣🤣
If the American electric chair was good enough for Winston Churchill who reputedly asked President Roosevelt to borrow one should Hitler be caught by the Allies alive and sentenced to death then it is good enough for me and those Tory traitors!😂
M’Lord of Essex:
Roosevelt went up the chimney before Adolf in the end, but Churchill, of course, and pickled in alcohol, continued for another 19 years. At least Churchill never claimed that “gas chambers” existed in German camps, so give him that…
Indeed he didn’t. Churchill wrote very extensive memoirs about WW2 and never mentioned them once. Charles De Gaulle also didn’t say anything about them with respect to his.
Virulently anti-British Tory scum are indigestible at the best of times so I doubt whether frying them painfully until they expire in a Yankee electric chair like bacon will make them any more attractive or edible but it is worth it to see!
The devil wants to see them return home to hell!
It’s FRYDAY, Tory scum!
That is your wholly justified punishment for mass immigration which you promised to lower to the “tens of thousands” as recently as 2010 but have singularly failed to achieve AND for effectively MURDERING tens of thousands during this pandemic through deliberately putting your sick ideology of open borders first instead of imposing ultra-tough travel restrictions IN MARCH LAST YEAR thus putting iBritish people’s lives at risk!😡🤬☹️😞
You WILL pay for your crimes eventually!
Ha, ha, don’t the Tories do a nice line in UTTER BARE FACED GALL?
They are now doing something they regularly accuse the Liberal Democrats of wanting to do!🙄 That is they are proposing to change the electoral system for the London Mayoral elections and the Police and Crime Commissioner elections from the present Supplementary Vote system to First Past The Post!
Why is that particularly in regard to Stab City Upon The Thames?
Is it because these globalist, open borders supporting dimwits have finally realised that due to the actions of previous ‘Tory’ governments from the 1950’s onwards there are now not enough white people left in our former capital city to provide any real backbone to the Tory vote thus making the election of a Tory mayor for the city an impossibility under the present system unless there were to be a huge increase in the likelihood of blacks and Asians to vote Tory?
Blacks and Asians in the main WON’T vote Tory especially when the Tory candidate is a very poor one anyway. Blacks in London are rather like American blacks when they hear a Republican candidate or President mention ‘law and order’. They don’t take it as a start to a serious discussion on the issue but as a barely-concealed ‘dog whistle’ to whites about them and they react accordingly by voting for the Democrats or, in our case, Labour in even greater numbers and Shaun Bailey has been mentioning ‘law and order’ and crime rather too often for their liking!
Many blacks see Shaun Bailey as a rather sad and pathetic ‘Uncle Tom’ character as well which doesn’t help!
The Tory proposal to change the system reeks of self-serving hypocrisy and now they can’t credibly lambast the Liberal Democrats for wanting to dump First Past The Post at Westminster for a system of Proportional Representation which, unlike with the Tory proposal for London etc, would help not just the Liberal Democrats but the Greens etc as well.
Besides which this Tory idea is outrageous because the position of London Mayor and the creation of the London Assembly and the ways they were elected came as a PACKAGE that was endorsed in a REFERENDUM of the people of London back in 1998.
If the Tories want to change the electoral system then they need to give Londoners another referendum to either agree the change or not or do they only want constitutional referendums for THEIR pet projects like leaving the EU?🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Yes, there are problems with the Supplementary Vote (SV) system but they can be changed by not adopting the archaic First Past The Post system but using instead the Alternative Vote (AV) which is also suitable for a position which can only be filled by one person at one time like First Past The Post. Indeed, single positions like being a Mayor. President (if we had one) etc are especially suitable for the Two Round system as in French Presidential Elections or preferential systems like the Supplementary Vote or Alternative Vote (AV).
I suspect though the Tories aren’t interested in solving the SV problem in THAT way because they rightly think that wouldn’t suit their electoral prospects of winning the London Mayoralty!🙄🙄🙄🙄. Quite simply, the Tories think the ONLY way they will ever be able to win the contest will be if the system is changed to First Past The Post. A system we share with the likes of authoritarian Belarus (complete with Europe’s only death penalty of a single shot in the back of the head).🙄🙄🙄
M’Lord of Essex,
The System parties only start to become interested in a fairer voting system when they have no chance of forming a government. Labour may exhibit a slight interest now because Labour’s chance of forming a government is low, and if Scotland pulls away from the UK, will be almost zero, becaue even a coalition or similar will then be impossible.
Indeed, at least with respect to Labour and the ‘What the hell is democracy anyway, common little oiks!’ Tories!
The Liberal Democrats have long had a principled position on Proportional Representation though I have to say it their predecessor party of the Liberals were not keen on the idea back when they were one of the two major parties in the early part of the last century!
Yes, it is no doubt the loss of all those traditionally Labour safe seats in Scotland that is helping to change minds in Labour over this issue.
The situation up there with the ridiculous over representation of the SNP caused by the archaic FPTP system should concern the Conservative AND supposedly UNIONIST party too and it is about time it did!🙄🙄🙄
By their proposal to dump the present SV system for First Past The Post (FPTP) for mayoral elections and Police and Crime Commissioners the CONServatives are undermining their own selfish and self-serving propaganda against changing FPTP for a system of Proportional Representation (PR) for the House of Commons.
They are conceding the fact that FPTP is only a plausibly credible electoral system for electing single positions like mayors and PCCs rather than electing PARLIAMENTS with MULTIPLE numbers of MPs elected at the same time! 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Be careful what you wish for, SELFServatives!
M’Lord of Essex, most of the arguments for FPTP do not stack up, but the real reason (apart from self-interest) that System parties decry proportional representation is because they would hate to see a nationalist (even conservative nationalist) party establish, then grow, a bloc of MPs. If a *social-national* party were to do that, the whole scam would fall apart.
Yes, undoubtedly that is the real reason for their blatantly undemocratic opposition to even a referendum where we could could choose a PR system.
The rigged referendum we had in 2011 was a ‘choice’ between the archaic system of FPTP and the equally if not more flawed system of the Alternative Vote (AV) which is PREFERENTIAL voting in single-member constituencies and therefore NOT PR nor even a little movement towards it!
First Past The Post would only be fair if distinct and organised political parties in the United Kingdom didn’t exist ie if ALL MPs stood as independents OR there were just two parties in the country and as a result of that EVERY seat had just two candidates standing in them. I believe the tax haven of Jersey has no island-wide political parties so people stand as independents hence FPTP works ok there.
People vote in their constituencies mainly upon the basis that the candidate they vote for wears a blue rosette etc rather than because they like that person.
FPTP offers us NO distinct and explicit vote for a PARTY only a LOCAL CANDIDATE. It is THAT crude and overly basic!
In fact, m’Lord of Essex, the real “local candidates” are few and far between; the vast majority are parachuted-in fakes, like Robert Largan at High Peak:
Or the ‘member for Tel Aviv West’ as he should be called! That globalist ‘Tory’ prat has absolutely no interest in the constituency he supposedly represents and is far more interested in ranting on and on and on about the alleged ‘anti-semitic’ tendencies of some of his constituents most of whom are not genuinely ‘anti-semitic’ at all but merely critics of how Israel’s government sometimes acts against the Palestinians!🙄🙄🙄