Diary Blog, 14 January 2022

Late morning music

[“At the end stands Victory“]

Tweets seen

[Mark Drakeford, Welsh Labour drone]

On this day a year ago

Afternoon music

More tweets

The three main System propaganda narratives (“Covid” “panicdemic”, “Black Lives Matter”/racemixing, and “climate change” via “emissions”) at present are being run simultaneously, but cannot effectively be given the same prominence at the same time.

More afternoon music

Cheerful evening music

“We need only victory!”

Late tweets

Jesus Christ! Is there no-one in Germany to deal with that woman and those like her?

Amen…

Read Houston Stewart Chamberlain, Hitler, Rosenberg, Savitri Devi, and others. They are the source…

You carry in your blood the holy inheritance of your
fathers and forefathers. You do not know those who
have vanished in endless ranks into the darkness of the
past. But they all live in you and walk in your blood upon
the earth that consumed them in battle and toil and in
which their bodies have long decayed.

Your blood is therefore something holy. In it your parents gave you not only a body, but your nature. To deny your blood is to deny yourself. No one can
change it. But each decides to grow the good that one has
inherited and suppress the bad. Each is also given will
and courage.

You do not have only the right, but also the duty to pass
your blood on to your children, for you are a member of
the chain of generations that reaches from the past into
eternity, and this link of the chain that you represent
must do its part so that the chain is never broken.

But if your blood has traits that will make your children
unhappy and burdens to the state, then you have the

heroic duty to be the last. The blood is the carrier of life. You carry in it the secret of creation itself. Your blood is holy, for in it God’s will
lives
.”

[SS Verlag: material for instruction of the Hitlerjugend]

Late music

[Unter den Linden, Berlin, 1945]

14 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 14 January 2022”

  1. You are “very Russian” today! Are you working for Putin…? (LOL)

    What is worrying about “Londoners should restrict their outdoor activities” is the fact that most of them, like the lemmings they are, will obey such ludicrous crap.

    Here is the same, the cowards (90% of the population) are wearing masks OUTDOORS! What makes it even more infuriating is the fact that, a month ago, the major of Buenos Aires told the sheeple that they did not need to be wearing masks outdoors; and yet, 8 out of 10 people I come across are wearing them!!! Talk about being terrified and brainless!!!

    Like

    1. Claudius:
      No, I am not a Russian agent; I am a free agent…

      As to your main point, though, I can only agree. Of course, the spinelessness of so many people today is exactly the precondition for a transnational police state..

      Like

      1. I hope you did not take me seriously, I was joking! Having said that, I would not mind working for Putin; at least he is a real statesman, not a pathetic and disgusting puppet of ZOG like the Western “leaders”…

        Like

  2. I have subscribed to the Royal Collection Trust newsletter, which keeps you informed about new exhibitions, restoration of important works of art, etc. In today’s newsletter, I found this (I felt like vomiting):

    https://www.rct.uk/about/news-and-features/portraits-of-holocaust-survivors-commissioned-by-hrh-the-prince-of-wales-to?utm_campaign=1032828_2022_01_general&utm_medium=email&utm_source=email_marketing&dm_i=4SVR,M4XO,4I51G7,2O5C7,1#/

    Like

    1. Claudius:
      “They” started to infiltrate the UK in (mainly) the late 19thC, gathered numbers and speed before WW1 and then from the 1930s, then started to take over not only finance and commerce but law, politics and other areas (esp. the msm).

      “Pushback” is now not enough…

      Like

      1. You are right, of course. Regarding the Jewish infiltration in the upper strata of British society, here is an interesting fragment from a book that, as far as I know, has not been published in English. Is a biography of the Jewish multimillionaire, Maurice de Hirsch (1831-1896). What makes it very interesting is that it was written in 2003 by a Jewess (Dominique Frischer) therefore, her, involuntary, confessions are particularly valuable. This is what she has to say about that slob known as Edward VII:

        “Hirsch’s other great friend was the Prince of Wales, ten years his junior. The future Edward VII (1841-1910), who had been brought up in the utmost austerity, had a relatively modest income for a prince of his rank. According to the Prince of Hohenlohe, second chancellor of Kaiser Wilhelm II, from a very young age, he had acquired the habit of surrounding himself with very rich people who helped him finance his wasteful lifestyle and his unbridled fondness for luxury, gambling, women and thoroughbreds. Since the wealthiest people in England happen to be Jews, there were many Jewish bankers in his immediate circle. True to the old tradition of court bankers, some consented to lend him large sums, not expecting to see them again” (pages 231-232)

        Like

  3. Something nice, for a change. A documentary about one of the least famous great British stately homes: Boughton House. Very nicely done, a real treat. I think Boughton House is far superior to the vulgar and ostentatious Blenheim Palace and more elegant than Chatsworth

    Like

      1. Yes, Ian, you are right, the Duke of Montague who was ambassador to Louis XIV, liked very much what he saw in Versailles, but he had the good taste and sense of not trying to imitate Louis XIV and kept things in proportion. That is why the whole place is so nice (at least to me) it is not a palace but a large, beautiful house.

        BTW, are those great houses open to visitors now? In France is awful; the bloody government has imposed vaccine-passports and masks on the people.

        Like

      2. Claudius:
        There are restrictions. I saw this
        https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/features/visiting-and-booking-information#Frequently%20asked%20questions%20anchor

        Re proportion in buildings, you may or may not know that (according to Frau Professor Troost), if Hitler suggested a frontage of, say, 100 metres, Troost would say “well, my Fuhrer, 80 might be more aesthetically proportioned”, whereas, after Troost died, and Speer became Hitler’s architectural adviser, Speer would say, in answer to the same question, “my Fuhrer, I think that 300 metres would be better”…
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Troost

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s