Diary Blog, 26 October 2023

Afternoon music

[Tangier in the rain]

Battles past

Tweets seen

Let’s talk about rape in France. We all know who is doing the raping, so we don’t have to talk about that. But, let’s prove it by numbers.

In 1971, the rate of declared rapes in France stood at 2.0 cases per 100,000 people. In 2015, when the “great migration” started the rape rate for France was 20.1 cases per 100,000 people.Today, they’re sitting at 39.59 cases per 100,000 people. You’re looking at nearly 94,000 reported rapes a year. About 5,000 to 7,000 of those rapes are gang rapes.

The other day, some migrant raped a 93 year old woman and a 95 year old woman while they were in a hospital.

Yet, many young liberal French women are still encouraging the illegal migration to continue. Do they think they’ll be passed over when a migrant randomly gets horny for something and they’re in arms distance? None of it has to be this way.

Eventually, what has to be done will be done, but how many White Northern European people will have to suffer and die before the iron necessity happens?

My own reminiscence of a day spent in a form of captivity in the Middle East about 25 years ago: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/03/07/when-i-was-not-arrested-in-egypt/.

Rachel Reeves is a horrible woman, completely in the pocket of the Jewish/Zionist lobby, completely dishonest, and a freeloading pseudo-Labour MP of the worst kind.

Rachel Reeves currently poses as Shadow Chancellor, yet she ran up a large debt on her (interest-free) House of Commons credit card, and for a long time refused to repay it. Typical unmerited “entitlement”, and reminiscent of the Blair-Brown “MPs in clover” days. The details of that credit card fraud/freeloading have been removed from Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Reeves#Political_positions_and_views

Sunak

I heard a droning political address on Sky News this morning, and thought that it was Blair but, when I looked up, saw that it was Sunak! Their voices are almost identical. How is this possible?

More tweets seen

The Universe is built on order, Divine order.

“They” always try to twist everything, and try to take over…

More music

“Where are the limits of religious freedom?

A blog post published 5 years ago, but since then read by almost nobody. I think that that is a pity, because I think it worth reading. I happened to notice that it had a hit, a single hit, this morning, the first for many months, so thought to republish it by the link below:

More music

More tweets

Get lost, you freeloading pseudo-intellectual fake.

If the Triple Lock is cut down, weaselled away, effectively abandoned, legions of State Pensioners will lash back at the “Conservative” Party. People aged 66+ years are the mainstay of the Con Party (both as voters and as members); if they go, the Con Party has no chance at the 2024 General Election and no future beyond that.

The Con Party (a far more accurate name than “Conservative”) is currently running at 25% in the opinion polls. The proportion of people of 65+ years in the UK is around 19%. The proportion of people aged 60+ is around 23%. Most of both categories vote Conservative. If even half of those abstain, or vote elsewhere, the nationwide Con Party vote might be as low as 15%, or even lower, and the number of Con Party seats after 2024 might be as few as 16 (Labour seats 548).

The two main System parties are both now without purpose. I had thought, a few years ago, that Labour would collapse first. Turns out that it will be the Con Party. Much as I despise most of the Labour MPs, particularly the Shadow Cabinet, and especially Israel puppet Starmer, the Con Party MPs have forfeited the right to live (speaking metaphorically and politically). Completely useless.

Incidentally, despite my now being (since 2022) a State Pensioner myself (hard for me to believe though that is), my views are not much coloured by that. I only receive about a half-pension anyway, having spent so many years overseas.

History comes full circle. Even a Jewish (albeit apparently anti-Zionist) tweeter has echoed my view that the attack on Gaza is most similar to the Reduction of the Warsaw Ghetto by German forces in 1943.

[Jews being led out of the Warsaw Ghetto by Waffen-SS men, 1943]

The German forces of 1943, mostly Waffen-SS, did not use poison gas in attacking the Warsaw Ghetto, and fought against the Jews (many of them armed) on the ground.

On that basis, the Jewish/Israeli attack on Gaza and its 2 million civilians is far more extreme than the German attack on the Warsaw Ghetto.

The Jews/Israelis are using massive air power to demolish whole neighbourhoods in Gaza. Now, if the Middle East Eye and Daily Telegraph reports are accurate, it seems that the Jews/Israelis may use poison gas (from what I have read somewhere or other —admittedly unverified— a cyanide compound similar to the “notorious” Zyklon B) to gas both Hamas operatives and unarmed civilians hiding below ground, and/or will use chemical “sponge bombs” to fill those tunnels, asphyxiating those in them.

History is more than ironic at times.

Having said that, we on the outside must just wait to see what happens. “In war, truth is the first casualty“…

See also: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sponge-bombs-israels-tactical-breakthrough-fight-against-gary-ramah-dxkac/.

More music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherevichki]
[St. Petersburg]

Late tweets

Late music

17 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 26 October 2023”

  1. Yes, Rachel Reeves is a nasty bitch but then that character trait of hers is the same as the party’s Fuhrer, Keir Starmer. He endorses the war crimes of the Zionist entity and the ending of a water supply to Palestinians yet has the sheer Chutzpah to call himself a ‘human rights lawyer’.

    The only human rights I have ever seen him endorse are those of esteemed BBC entertainer, Jimmy Saville.

    Why does anyone, muslim, non-muslim, decent Jew or gentile alike of common humanity give Likud 2 the time of day?

    Like

  2. I am not being funny here when I say that if Likud 2 was a party in Germany it would be in grave danger of being hauled before that country’s Constitutional Court and investigated by it.

    After Germany’s experience of Hitler’s dictatorship, there are very strict rules around how a party can be ruled and organised internally. Simply put, parties run on what appears to be the ‘Fuhrer Prinzip’ ie a strong leader with little respect for internal democracy can be investigated by the Constitutional Court and there exists a possibility of banning them.

    Like

  3. “Oppose the Pandemic Treaty” Really? What a lot of crap! There is NOTHING we can do about it and they know it! It is all done by decree! That is “democracy” for you morons!

    Like

  4. No it certainly is not, James Melville. Pandemics can kill millions or even more than that across the globe and collapsing economies on a world basis.

    Only thick libertarian extremists like you don’t recognise the stone cold FACT pandemics are often GLOBAL affairs hence the need for co-ordinated worldwide action to tackle them and yes international treaties.

    Very few things should be dealt with it on the international level but pandemics are one of them along with climate change which affects our common home ie this earth which EVERY human being shares.

    Like

  5. Electric cars and actually electric FLYING cars ARE the future and no libertarian ‘climate change is not a real thing’ nutter is going to be able to act as a King Canute and hold these technologies back.

    Electric car batteries and battery technology for renewable energy purposes is now developing rapidly. Literally, tens of billions of pounds are being invested by massive global companies such as Volkswagon and Toyota with respect to this and now big progress is being made even though battery technology is a very complicated science.

    Like

  6. Claire Fox always was a vile individual. A former member of the Socialist Workers’ Party, an apologist for IRA terrorism and welcomed with open arms into fraudulent Farage’s Brexit Party and its grifters.

    I am so glad I never voted for the Brexit ‘party’ containing as it did people like her. I would never have managed to disinfect myself afterwards if I had done so.

    When is this country going to get some decent parties like Germany’s Afd or that new leftwing on economics/ Right-wing on social matters party set-up by a former member of Die Linke (The Left) Sarah (I’ve forgotten her surname) in the last few days?

    German politics is so much more interesting than very stale British politics with its useless out of date ‘mainstream’ parties and to tiny ‘parties’ of grifters and fakes.

    Like

      1. Germany isn’t a perfect democracy by any means but compared to us they are lightyears ahead. We share the sane farcical, unfit for purpose, severely out of date, profoundly undemocratic electoral system as that well-known global icon of democracy, Belarus, for God’s Sake.

        The less said about Britain’s very weak democratic credentials the better. The British government should shut-up and stop embarrassing itself when lecturing other governments in most countries about democracy with our dire ‘democratic’ political system.

        Like

  7. Still, Germany would be like us if it wasn’t a genuine modern DEMOCRACY and had our heavily compromised, largely fake ‘semi-democracy’ instead.

    Like

  8. The Tory Party’s great fear is a hung parliament which is a situation where even the ‘Dear Leader’ of Likud 2, Keir Starmer, might severely frighten himself, show he isn’t just a ventriloquist’s dummy for Israel and have an ever so mild attack of inspiration at long last and concede the possibility of introducing fair votes/Proportional Representation.

    The Tories would be petrified at that hence what is now a deliberate attempt to lose properly. However, they ought to be careful because if the present opinion poll trends are accurate or they get worse they won’t be just losing but losing so badly they won’t be a viable opposition. There does come a point where you lose so many seats you will find it very difficult or impossible to recover and that mark must be around 140 seats or fewer.

    Like

    1. John:
      Anything is possible in terms of GE 2024, but I find significant two facts, the first being the sheer number of Con Party MPs now saying that they will step down next year. Already about 60; secondly, the opinion polls, and such as readers’ comments in the Mail etc, to the effect that, while the voters speaking would not vote Labour, they will not vote Con (in many cases for the first time in their lives).

      That really does seem to indicate a massive cull of Con Party MPs. There may be, after 2024, 25, there may be 50, 100, 150 or even more, but my inclination is to think maybe 100, at best, left.

      Any protest votes will mostly go to the Farage-ist confidence trick, Reform UK, or to the LibDems, but my feeling is Reform UK zero MPs, and LibDems somewhere in the 10-20 range.

      Like

      1. I think the Lib Dems will get around 30 simply through the Conservative Party’s vote share collapsing in seats like Eastbourne, Lewes, Cheltenham where they are in a competitive second place position.

        Just a mere glance at the front page of Electoral Calculus here:

        https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk

        shows immediately what a farcical, illogical, profoundly undemocratic electoral system Britain has.

        Whilst I have no regard for them, it is clearly nonsensical for the Reform Party to poll six point one percent (above the typical 5% threshold for representation many PR systems have) and get NO seats at all whilst the Greens get one with 6 percent by presumably winning their existing seat of Brighton Pavillon.

        We really must move away from an electoral system where the value of someone’s vote is so dependent upon where they live in the country.

        Like

  9. What exactly is an ‘anti-semitic’ view, Claire Fox, and who gets to define it?

    Would these decent and moral guys have ‘anti-semitic’ viewponts?:

    https//www.nkusa.org

    Are they ‘self-hating Jews’?

    Let us get away from this farcical definition of ‘anti-semitism’ whereby even anti-Zionist Ultra-othodox Jews are said to be ‘anti-semitic’?

    When ‘anti-semitism’ is defined so broadly it has lost all real meaning.

    I once went to Stamford Hill where many of these ultra Orthodox Jews live. It was quite strange walking around there and feeling like I was on a movie set for one of my favourite films ie Fiddler On The Roof!

    Like

  10. If I were the unelected Indian money juggler/ ‘Dr Death’ I would have some humility at long last and just shut the hell up.

    Even someone with the hide of a rhino like he has must know, deep down, he is unwanted and that he has no idea whatsoever as to how to restore Tory fortunes.

    Where are the Tory MPs with their best quality Japanese folded Damascus steel kitchen knives to do what must be done soon?

    Like

Leave a comment