Morning music
Tweets seen
The basic conundrum is “what is democracy?“— See https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/15/has-parliamentary-democracy-as-we-have-known-it-until-now-had-its-day-in-the-uk/.
Reform UK is a symptom of how angry rather a lot of English people are about the state of the country. Over 4 million votes, over 14% of those voters who voted (i.e. Reform UK was voted for by 1 in 7 voters).
Reform UK got 14.3% of votes, but only 5 MPs.
LibDems? Fewer votes by far than Reform, yet 72 MPs. Ridiculous.
The Conservative Party got 23.7%, little more than one and a half times the number of votes taken by Reform, yet 121 MPs.
Where is the justice, or even logic, in that?
As for the Labour Party, its 33.7% of votes cast represents less than two and a half times the Reform vote, yet it ends up with 411 MPs!
Again, no justice and no logic.
Apparently, Peter Barnes (or Peter C. Barnes) is a UK political campaigns person, who works or has worked for the Conservative Party, and who appears on the “no-one watches” Talk TV and the “almost no-one watches” GB News television outlets.
Seems that Barnes blames Reform UK for Labour’s faux “landslide” (procured by a mere 33.7% of votes cast, i.e. about 20% of all potential votes), and via an electoral system patently not fit for purpose.
In reality, the blame for the Starmer-Labour victory should be placed, first and foremost, with a succession of supposedly “Conservative” governments over the past 14 years, headed by no less than 5 Conservative Party prime ministers who all turned out to be complete deadheads.
Those Conservative Party governments presided over the importation of 3-4 MILLION immigrants, mostly non-European, and over the trashing of public services including the libraries, courts, police, district nursing, roads, elder care, social housing; also riverine pollution… you name it.
At present, mass immigration into the UK is somewhere around a million a year. Yes, a few hundred thousand also leave, but most of the leavers are Brit or other European people emigrating to Australasia and elsewhere.
Barnes seems to think that, had Reform UK not existed, all or most of its voters would have voted Con, thus preventing a Labour government, or one with a majority.
First of all, while most 2024 election Reform UK voters would not have voted Labour in those or any circumstances, that does not mean that they would have voted Con. Probably not. More likely, abstention.
Secondly, parties exist for a reason. There now seems little reason for most voters to vote Con. That seems to be lost on Westminster Bubble types such as Barnes (of whom I had not heard until today). Reform UK is the outcome of profound discontent in the depths of the population.
If Labour (as I firmly expect) fails to give the British people what they require, then Reform UK will not only grow in influence, but will also be the least of the problems of the System parties.
Britain needs a real social-national movement.
Cronyism, petty or not so petty corruption and fraud…it’s like the Blair-Brown years all over again.
Building hutches for migrant-invaders.
Not just Muslims in the UK. The Labour “elected” dictatorship will no doubt target any English people unwilling to accept the Zionists.
Rachel Reeves believes in the nationalization of intimidation…
We must be clear: the minority of “activist” blacks and browns want the real British people, the so-called “white British”, to disappear, bred out or otherwise disposed of.
As I predicted. Labour continues the fiction that the problem is “smuggling gangs” etc, when the real problem is the migration invasion itself (both “legal” and “illegal”), and that would be about the same whether or not various types of criminal were making profits from it all.
I also predicted that Labour in government would open “processing centres” in France, approve 95% of applicants (who will then travel on to the UK “legally”, via ferry or air); the TV and newspaper coverage of invaders being ferried to the South Coast ports (via RNLI and Border Force) or beaches (via rubber boats etc) will simply all but stop, but the invasion itself will continue, just invisibly.
Tweeter “@IGMansfield” obviously loves the new “elected” dictatorship of Labour, as it prepares to build over the once “green and pleasant land” so that the invading migrants have a hutch to call their own. No consultation, no appeal, and he loves it.
We often talk about the “enemies of the people”. They now emerge in plain sight. Those who want to trash what is left of this country, whether for profit or for political tendentiousness.
Look at those applauding that tweet (eg below). Not all, or even mostly, any kind of “socialist”:
There is still a small window of opportunity for a party such as Reform UK, or even a genuinely social-national party, to make headway in terms of Commons seats etc. All roads lead to Rome. However, we are getting to the point where ordinary political activity, as per the Reform phenomenon, is not likely to lead to real success, or to triumph.
We are facing an exploding non-European population in the UK, and an upcoming repression on free speech worse than anything so far seen.
Meanwhile, the hordes of “useful idiots” applaud fake “Labour” and love to see government being tyrannical and careless of civil rights (a phenomenon also noted during the 2020-2022 “Covid” panicdemic/scamdemic),
Again…
The “enemies of the people”…
Starmer-Labour has little in common with “the party formerly known as Labour”; it is a finance-capitalist project, which poses (and is presented by the msm) as wildly popular because of its Commons “landslide”, when in reality (as examined on the blog over the past few days), it only got 33.7% of the popular vote. Indeed, 40% of the eligible electorate did not vote, so the real support for Starmer-Labour in the country is only about 20%.
This is a WEF government, a ZOG/NWO government, a Labour Friends of Israel government, a Bilderberg government. It has no real validity.
Incidentally, I now know who that tweeter “@IGMansfield” is— a senior figure at the finance-capitalist “think tank” (lobby org), Policy Exchange: https://policyexchange.org.uk/news/new-additions-to-our-expanded-team-at-policy-exchange/.
Starmer-Labour is really just another globalist and finance-capitalist “project” akin to Blair’s “New Labour”, as seen in the many Blair-Brown faces now in government. The myriad new MPs are basically lobby-fodder.
Miliband, who claimed in 2009 at Copenhagen that we had either 3 or 5 years to “save the planet”. Then the planet yawned and everyone, or almost everyone, forgot about the prediction (which was echoed by the then Prince Charles).
Well, now Miliband is back, wanting to cover the countryside in turbines.
I thought that that “@Bushra1Shaikh” Twitter/X account must be some form of satire, but apparently not.
There it is, anyway— the latest batch of migrant-invaders, brought to the UK by one of the government agencies meant to protect our borders from invasion and breach by criminals…
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalergi_Plan.
The “Bushra Shaikh” person tweeting actually seems to exist for real, albeit on an incredibly low intellectual/educational level.
Just looked her up online. Apparently, she was on the TV show The Apprentice about 7 years ago, in 2017 (fired before the show came to an end). 40-41 years old, a divorced single mother of three children, and a businesswoman of some sort, who sells Muslim clothing.
Late tweets
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
Well, the French bottled it unfortunately.
I wonder if these election results in the UK and France are even real, or whether the (((powers that be))) are committing election fraud or even simply picking (((their))) desired outcome and arranging the election results to match what (((they))) want.
The UK election result was the perfect outcome for the (((globalists))).
And now the French election turned out the same: the perfect result for the (((globalists))), or at least the best (((they))) could hope for with (((their))) neoliberal centrist puppet Macron totally unpopular and discredited with the French public.
Somehow the far left unexpectedly came out of nowhere and won the most seats. Very suspicious, in my opinion.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Macron arranges some kind of coalition or “confidence and supply” arrangement, where the Far Left props up his neoliberal government, in exchange for the implementation of certain Far Left policies which (surprise, surprise) coincidentally happen to benefit the globalists, for example harsher “hate speech” laws, more third world immigration, weaker sentences for minorities convicted of crimes, more brainwashing of children, more LGBTQ degeneracy, etc.
I guess the counterargument to the possibility of election (((fraud))) would be: “well, if the (((globalists))) committed fraud, why did (((they))) let the National Rally get so many seats?”
Maybe the election results are legit and the Far Left just got lucky, unexpectedly.
I don’t know. I think it’s very suspicious.
If next year’s Bundestag election in Germany has a poor outcome for the AfD, I will be totally convinced that these election results are (((fraudulent))) and do not reflect the will of the people.
In any case, the collusion between the Far Left and Macron’s centrist neoliberals should serve as a wake-up call to the Far Left’s voters that the Far Left is controlled opposition, and will always support the interests of (((neoliberal globalism))) when (((ordered))) to do so.
We see this not only in France, but in every Western country.
In British online forums, before the election leftists were openly saying that they would prefer 150 Tory MPs in parliament, rather than 20 Reform MPs.
At the end of the day, the left will always collude with the centrist neoliberal (((establishment))) whenever a rightwing nationalist movement threatens that (((establishment))).
We see this in Ireland too, where Sinn Fein fully supports the (((neoliberal))) replacement of the indigenous White Irish people.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
Compare Greece in 2015. You will recall that the collapse of the incompetent and corrupt System parties from 2008-2014 led to the growth of new parties, notably the social-national Golden Dawn (anti-banking web, anti-EU etc), and the supposedly “socialist” Syriza.
The System then repressed Golden Dawn, arresting its leadership, trumping up charges against them etc. Syriza was enabled to take over the government in 2015, then it immediately caved in to EU/globalist banking pressure, and brought even more poverty to Greece. Scroll on 4 years to 2019, and Syriza was sidelined, “mainstream” System parties taking over again.
LikeLike
Excellent observation and analogy, Ian. I am convinced that there was an electoral fraud in France. Suddenly, hundreds of thousands of voters came “out of the blue” and ALL of them voted for the “Popular Front”. Oh, please! Do you expect me to believe that?
This French election resembles very much that obscene fraud called the “US Presidential Elections of 2020”.
LikeLike
This is the type of green energy we can all get on board with.
Water wheels have always interested me since being taken to visit and learn about them on school trips.
Apart from reinventing the wheel, it is clear that Mr Nering spends time lifting weights and should also be congratulated on his physique.
https://x.com/Rainmaker1973/status/1809890391883137258
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for that! What a clever man!
LikeLike
A second comment from me today.
This is uplifting. I wish we could have a new National Anthem, although it would probably bring the country to the brink of civil war choosing one.
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1810093000430932054
LikeLike
Hey, I’m the Peter Barnes you’re talking about, a hell of a lot assumptions made off the back of one tweet
how about a debate? Thrash this out or maybe even just a conversation where you ask my views and not some lame attacks
Get in you touch you clearly have my twitter, message me
LikeLike
Peter C. Barnes:
I am posting your comment in the interest of free speech.
I am not on Twitter/X and have not posted tweets since 2018, when my account was closed down by Twitter.
I have just taken a look, and *one* of your tweets was featured on the blog, on 8 July 2024; no other reference to your expressed views has ever been made on the blog.
There are people on Twitter/X with the same name as me, who are sometimes mistaken by others as being me.
I do not think that I want to “debate” your tweet, about which I forgot 4.5 months ago, or generally. However, thank you for your interest.
LikeLike