Morning music
London. Zoo.
“Two asylum seekers who targeted a reveller for his £25,000 Rolex in London’s West End walked free from court today.
Egyptian Yousef Garef and Algerian Amin Abdelkadar were both spared jail and handed community orders on Wednesday. Both admitted to robbery.
The pair, attacked Kris Smith at around 2am in Soho, London on July 21 last year, seizing his gold Rolex Day Date watch.“
[Daily Mail]
Is comment even necessary?
This country is so screwed it is actually almost unbelievable. Not only because of migration invasion, but that, together with a “multicultural” population, is the cause of much of the overall problem.
Starmer-Labour will not “fix” the problems of the UK. Au contraire—Labour’s fake “landslide” regime will worsen them. Starmer-Labour is wedded to “diversity”, “anti-racism” (except against white English people) etc.
More from the newspapers
“Germany plans to halve its military aid to Ukraine in 2025, to €4bn, despite concerns over continued US support, according to a draft budget seen by Reuters. Instead the German government hopes Ukraine will be able to meet the bulk of its military needs with $50bn in loans from proceeds of frozen Russian assets approved by the G7, and that funds earmarked for armaments will not be fully used.”
There is no “Ukraine” as such now, just the Kiev regime, which can either be regarded as a “failed state” or a non-state.
Tweets seen
What an amazing creature.
Starmer says that the event of 7 October 2023 was the worst attack on Israel since “the holocaust”. Israel did not exist as a state until 1948.
Leaving that aside, Starmer is a total puppet of the Israeli state and the UK Israel lobby.
More from the newspapers
“A single mother-of-two, who framed an innocent woman when she drove a pick-up truck and towed a trailer illegally, has dodged jail after revealing her personal woes.
Juliann Quilligan, 27, from Skelmersdale, Lincolnshire falsely told police her name was Rebecca Williams when she was pulled over for illegally towing a trailer on the M62.
The mother was driving her Mitsubishi L200 without being insured and kept quiet as police added eight points to the unaware woman’s licence.
She argued that she became ‘panicked’ and ‘frightened’ when dealing with police due to mental health issues exacerbated by her estrangement from the travelling community which she fled in 2019 so her children could go to school.
The victim – Miss Williams – only discovered she had been wrongly convicted in her absence when she attempted to renew the insurance policy on her own car.“
[Daily Mail]
Egregious. Also, leaving aside the sheer injustice of it all, note the absence of proper journalism and sub-editing of that report. “Skelmersdale, Lincolnshire“, writes the Daily Mail scribbler, one Shannon McGuigan, when surely a “journalist” should know that Skelmersdale is in Lancashire…
Again, the Daily Mail report is really quite poorly-written, something which is now almost the norm in most newspapers.
Proper journalism is another thing that has just faded away and died in the UK.
Speaking of brainless “journalism”…(see below)
What, “I wonder”, will much of the UK be like in, say, 2029, or 2034? What, “I wonder”, will be happening then? Many of us can see it coming.
“Immigration laws, said Thomas Sowell, are the only laws that are discussed in terms of how to help people who break them. By allowing 100,000 illegal migrants to stay in Britain we are incentivising others to break the law while treating British people, who want strong borders & play by the rules, with contempt https://telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/07/17/labour-fast-track-asylum-claims-90000-migrants-rwanda-uk/“
[Matt Goodwin]
Of course, inflation since 2008 means that the £522, to have kept pace with inflation, would have to be £825.94 in 2024 (rather than the 2021 of the tweet): see https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/inflation-calculator
Just Stop Oil
Harsh sentences, though at the same time I myself oppose those idiots wholeheartedly. I am not —generally— a “hanger and flogger”.
Those people have no answers to the problems facing us.
Incidentally, I have blogged a few times in the past about Roger Hallam, Extinction Rebellion, Just Stop Oil etc: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/08/16/the-extinction-rebellion-levellers/;
Court report: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jul/18/five-just-stop-oil-supporters-jailed-over-protest-that-blocked-m25
More tweets seen
True, but try telling that to the Twitter-twits, the self-describing “anti-racists” and “anti-fascists” etc…
Of course, the migration invasion is not being allowed to happen by accident:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalergi_Plan; see also https://www.ilpost.it/2018/01/16/piano-kalergi/.
The backlash from the people has grown, in the UK, in Ireland, and also across mainland Europe. In the UK, it drove the upsurge of voters for the actually rather mild Reform UK at the General Election of 2024 (over 4 million voters voted Reform UK. The Conservative Party only had about 6 million voters, and victorious Labour about 9 million).
The Conservative Party was dumped mainly because of both the invasion itself and also its down-the-line consequences, though sheer incompetence generally was also a major factor.
Late tweets
Don’t say that we did not warn you…
I seem to recall that a certain political leader, now long-deceased, made sure that that could not happen in the territories under his rule…
…and the millions more that will be arriving…
Late historical note
Mein Kampf was first published on 18 July 1925.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
I wonder who these criminals might be?
Britain’s Unsolved Crimewave – Dispatches
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kj2ghENIjvo
LikeLike
If I remember correctly a couple of days ago you published a photo of the palace of Nymphenburg. Here is a short but beautiful video in HD of the palace that miraculously survived the criminal British carpet bombing policy of Churchill & Co. Part of the palace is home to the current Duke of Bavaria (Herzog von Bayern) a great-grandson of Ludwig III, the last King of Bavaria deposed in 1918.
LikeLike
Claudius:
Thank you.
That was certainly “the Age of Rococo”.
LikeLike
The [REDACTED] use the weaponized term “anti-semitism” to silence and intimidate anyone who points out how evil (((they))) are and all the evil things (((they))) do.
Don’t let (((them))) intimidate you into silence.
If (((they))) accuse you of being “anti-semitic”, don’t curl up in a ball and grovel and try to explain how you aren’t “anti-semitic.”
There is absolutely nothing wrong with being “anti-semitic”, because [REDACTED] is evil, and opposing evil is the morally righteous thing to do.
If you oppose [REDACTED], YOU are on the morally right side.
You have nothing to be ashamed of.
When someone calls you “anti-semitic” etc, the correct (and most effective) response is to say something like:
“of course I am anti-[REDACTED]. [REDACTED] is wicked, depraved, and evil. I oppose all evil things.”
This shifts the topic of the conversation from whether you are an “anti-semite”, to whether [REDACTED] is evil.
And of course since [REDACTED] IS evil, when the discussion is framed this way, the [REDACTED] and (((their))) apologists can’t win the debate, since the facts reveal the truth.
If the person you are debating with asks why [REDACTED] is evil, be prepared to explain.
If the other person says “you can’t say that an ENTIRE group of people is evil!”, respond:
“You can when the entire group adheres to an evil ideology. Do you consider ISIS to be evil? There may be some people in ISIS who are slightly less evil than the others, but ISIS still has an evil ideology, so all of the members of ISIS are complicit in evil and adhere to evil. The same is true of [REDACTED].”
If you are talking to a [REDACTED], accuse the [REDACTED] of being a [REDACTED] supremacist. Put the [REDACTED] on the defensive and make (((them))) try to explain why (((they))) shouldn’t be considered a [REDACTED] supremacist.
If (((they))) try to deny that [REDACTED] is a supremacist and hateful ideology, immediately start listing all the depraved things that [REDACTED] religious texts such as the talmud say about non-j**s.
Demand that the [REDACTED] disavows and renounces his [REDACTED] identity. If the [REDACTED] refuses to do so, then say that means the [REDACTED] is a [REDACTED] supremacist, since [REDACTED] is an inherently racist and supremacist ideology, which teaches [REDACTED] that all non-[REDACTED] only exist to be subjugated, abused, and exploited by [REDACTED].
Note: The above approach might not be advisable in all jurisdictions. I am not sure exactly what constitutes “hate speech” in British law, so please be careful, since the [REDACTED] will persecute you for speaking the truth, just as (((they))) persecuted Jesus Christ. As Jesus says in the Bible, if the world hates you, remember that the world hated Jesus first. (John 15:18-27)
Note to the blog owner: Feel free to REDACT this post as you see fit, in order to comply with the draconian UK “hate speech” laws. I wouldn’t want you to get in any legal trouble because of my post.
Unbelievable that the (((enemies))) of Britain have the power to put truth-telling British patriots in prison for trying to warn everyone about how the (((enemies))) are destroying the British people.
Just think: the (((enemies))) who are working every day to destroy the British people AREN’T put in prison. The truth-tellers who try to WARN the public about the (((evildoers))) are put in prison by the (((system))).
Unbelievable.
And it was Thatcher who made the imprisonment of truth-tellers possible, with her Public Order Act 1986.
So as I said above, please feel free to redact this post to comply with the British laws. I don’t want you to get into trouble.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
I regret that, as you anticipated, I *have* redacted rather a lot of your comment.
I daresay that, as commonly happens in countries where free speech is very restricted, many will still be able to read between the lines to discern your meaning.
LikeLike
No problem at all, Mr. Millard! I understand that the UK has very harsh laws against free speech.
In the USA, the First Amendment has protected our freedom of speech so far, but how much longer that will last is an open question.
The (((enemies))) are currently looking for various ways to undermine and subvert the First Amendment.
(((They))) are claiming that “hate speech isn’t free speech.”
Already (((they))) are chipping away at the edges of free speech, for example by making it a crime in some states to project “offensive” images onto buildings, even though using a projector to beam a message onto the outside of a building does no damage.
(((They))) also have politicians (and sometimes the police) make announcements falsely telling the public that “hate speech” is illegal.
These announcements are intentionally phrased to intimidate people, with oppressive language such as “hate speech will not be tolerated in this state.”
The intent is to deceive the public into believing that “hate speech” is a crime, when it is actually protected under the First Amendment.
Fortunately the First Amendment is still in force, much to (((their))) dismay.
LikeLike