Afternoon music
Thoughts about the Manchester Airport event
First of all, the full facts, in detail, are not publicly known; I certainly do not know them.
Having said that, a few things do occur to me. The most forceful policeman in the now-infamous video clip plainly went far beyond what was necessary. His prisoner or opponent was lying face down, hands apparently bound. He was apparently not moving at all. The policeman kicked him in the head, a hard kick which might have killed the prisoner. The policeman then stamped down hard —he was wearing boots— another assault that might also have killed the prisoner.
Secondly, the context is not on film; allegedly, an immediately-earlier assault by the Muslim family on a policewoman and another. I suppose that that policewoman was the young woman running around like a headless chicken in the video. Useless.
Thirdly, I noticed in the later video that another totally useless policewoman was there, doing nothing but being a useless extra body. There should probably be a rethink about the utility of policewomen in uniformed front-line roles, as UK society becomes ever-more violent.
Fourthly, the comment of Richard Tice MP of Reform UK, applauding the (apparent) over-reaction by one or two of the policemen, was predictably brainless.
Fifthly, the cartoon below is increasingly relevant in the UK:
Actually, another point also occurred to me as I watched a few minutes of TV news coverage: how many of the passengers seen in the background were non-European.
Tweets seen
As frequently said on the blog, Starmer has no real ideas. Hopeless.
Trump is, obviously, a very flawed individual, but it is hard to imagine what kind of American would rather vote for Kamala Harris, a useless box-ticking careerist and know-nothing.
I suppose that the Democrats hope that she will capture the votes of the “blacks and browns” (etc), a simple racially-based preference based on the fact that she is mixed-race [father Jamaican, mother Indian Tamil: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris#Early_life_and_education].
A third “world war” would be devastating, probably on a scale exceeding even that of the 1939-45 conflict. We can only hope that humanity, i.e. those individuals and groups with real power, pull back from the brink. If not, Europe, and quite likely Asia and North America as well, may face near-wipeout.
Nadine Dorries, pretty brainless freeloader though she is, is right about the semi-gangster milieu that has grown up, over two decades or more, in the centre of the “Conservative” Party. Given my head, I should know how to get rid of nuisances of that sort, but I am “not allowed” to detail that, in our “free” and supposedly liberal country.
The most important reform would be to the electoral system. As frequently recently noted on the blog, at the recent General Election and out of every 20 eligible voters, 8 decided not to vote, a clear repudiation of the political system, the voting system, and the “main parties”.
Of the remaining (12) voters who did vote, a mere 4 voted Labour, 3 Conservative, 2 each for Reform UK and LibDem (though Reform got far more votes), and 1 (not quite) voted Green.
That is Starmer-Labour’s mandate and support-base— 4 people out of every 20.
A few years old; now, much more money going to Israel.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
The cost of living in the USA.
Watch how Carlson fails to point out the people he is naming in his report are nearly all jews.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frMZKG2Y3i0
LikeLike
Tucker Carlson is a coward. A man in his position with a great career behind him and lots of money in the bank could easily afford to name the enemies of mankind and get away with it. We are in this mess because lots of people like him, who could and SHOULD speak up remain silent out of greed.
Here is an excellent article about Mr. Carlson; the title says everything:
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2020/09/27/dissecting-tucker-carlson/
LikeLike
“We are in this mess because lots of people like him, who could and SHOULD speak up remain silent out of greed.”
This is a problem with the White elites/upper class in general.
Instead of being brave enough to stand up and speak up for the survival of their own race, the overwhelming majority of White elites are either actively complicit in the destruction of their own people, or are silent and do absolutely nothing to prevent it.
The motives for this include ambition, greed, and cowardice. All of these motives are self-centered.
There are a few VERY rare exceptions. For example, the excellent 7th Baron Sudeley, who sadly passed away in 2022, was an active British patriot and ethnonationalist. Sudeley was for many years president of the Traditional Britain Group. So there are a FEW examples of White elites who stand up for the White races.
But these examples are very rare.
The overwhelming majority of White elites, the people who could really make a big difference with their money and power and influence, are either actively involved in the destruction of the White race, or are too cowardly and self-centered to speak up.
Can you imagine the difference it would have made if the Queen had spoken up for the indigenous British people during her reign, especially in the earlier decades when the destruction of Britain was still in the early stages?
The Queen would have had almost the unanimous support of all the British people, and the Tories and Labour would both have had to stop flooding Britain with immigrants, and stop passing “hate speech” laws, etc.
But instead of speaking up, the Queen not only was cowardly and silent, but even gave Royal Assent to all the evil laws passed by successive Tory and Labour governments.
She was too concerned about maintaining her wealth and status to speak up for her own people.
The same is true of almost all of the White aristocrats, dukes, earls, barons, wealthy businessmen, politicians, etc who have lived over the past several decades.
They are too self-centered and too cowardly to stand up for their own race. Many of them are busily enriching themselves by doing things that actively harm White people.
The betrayal of the White working/middle class by the White elites is utterly reprehensible.
LikeLike
There have been a few opinion polls conducted since the inevitability of Biden dropping out of the race occurred. They show that the laughing hyena, Kamala Harris, has closed the gap but that Trump is still in the game which means his winning in November can happen. The race is very polarised and not much further movement of voters is likely. No doubt it will go down to the wire with just a few states voting one way or the other being the difference. One state or a single congressional district in Nebraska or Maine could put Trump or Harris over the top and get the vital 270 votes or more in the Electoral College to win.
LikeLike
John:
I still find it incredible that anyone would choose Kamala Harris over Trump, for all his faults and defaults.
LikeLike
I feel the same way. Could it be possible that these statistics are false in preparing the public for a new electoral fraud as in 2020? Let´s face it, as flawed as Trump is, for some reason, the hardcore Democrats (that means, potential Bolshevik assassins) hate him with a passion; the media is on their side, why not try a remake of 2020?
I am very pessimistic about this election.
LikeLike
Claudius:
You may be right. There are too many odd aspects to the attempted assassination (just as with the Kennedy assassination).
Kamala Harris is just a “monkey on a stick”. Behind her are the secret cabals and Western ruling circles, all intent on war with Russia via “supporting” the Kiev regime (and, it goes without saying) Israel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She has the media behind her so far too many people in the US, France, Germany, here and in other Western countries allow themselves to be too easily influenced by them. No doubt some women perhaps suburban ones in the key ‘swing states’ – an important voting demographic will vote for her to elect the first woman President! I think some women did that here in 1979 so that Margaret Thatcher became our country’s first female leader even though Maggie was no feminist!
LikeLike
Kamala Harris is definitely being promoted by the globalist liberal-left media in America. The ‘Deep State’ in that country and in others want her in the White House so that the war in Ukraine can be prosecuted to the full and Russia as a power tamed even to the extent of provoking a nuclear conflict.
Trump is more likely to stand in their way so his candidacy must fail by fair means or foul.
LikeLike
So many Americans viscerally hate Trump. For years I have seen the most vile comments about Trump on social media, in places that are not even political. They are almost hysterical.
Do they really believe Trump will end democracy? There is a belief that something gargantuan happened on January 6th, that Trump was trying to overturn the election results and install himself as a Dictator. Where is the video footage that evidences such a claim? There is none.
The problem is that people are not prepared to believe what they see with their own eyes, they prefer to believe the press narrative. Same as no matter how many photos of dead children or destroyed infrastructure in Gaza is shown, Americans will claim Palestinians are killing jews and attacking Israel.
LikeLike
The attack that started the war on October 7th was probably known about by Israel before it happened. Although they are capable of ‘dropping the ball’ I find it hard to believe the Zionist entity’s security services were incompetent enough to not see it coming as Mossad and Shin Bet are usually very efficient and effective at their jobs. The quasi-fascist/ultra-nationalist/’REAL ‘far right’ Israeli government has expansionist settlement desires on the Gaza Strip.
LikeLike
John:
That *apparent* ignorance on the part of the Israeli intelligence and security services was what struck me when the attack happened, together with the unexpected ability of the Arabs to mount such an operation, co-ordinate a large number of forces etc, and to keep the planned operation secret.
LikeLike
Yes, Starmer is utterly hopeless. Just a charisma free, globalist anti-British drone for the Zionist entity and Ukraine. Britain LAST is very much what passes for a coherent political philosophy with him. At least with Neil Kinnock and Corbyn there was some mild social democratic/socialist values which could have been used for the benefit of Britain’s poor and vulnerable people but Starmer doesn’t give a damm about them.
British children in poverty can go to hell whilst Starmer gives money to Ukraine and to blatantly fraudulent ‘asylum seekers’ and illegal immigrants.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Being “charisma free” is the least of Starmer’s problems. From blocking the arrest in the UK of Tzipi Livni for war crimes, to refusing to stop selling arms to Israel and suspending seven of his own MP’s because they voted for giving families money for their children.
To me, Starmer has a downright nasty streak in him, I feel he is potentially dangerous.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are spot on! The man is a horrible, hateful creature. He is the kind of person whose hand would not tremble when sentencing thousands to death. He would have been an excellent NKVD officer under Stalin.
LikeLike
I, like you, think that charisma is not a vital quality in a PM. After all, Bliar was said by some to be charismatic but he done this country immense damage not least on account of his grotesquely irresponsible and nation-wrecking levels of mass immigration and that stupid war in Iraq which had nothing to do with essential British national interests. Policies which he and his party should never be forgiven for.
I don’t like to blow my own trumpet but I have to say I saw him coming as soon as he became Labour leader and judged his character correctly so I didn’t vote for the con of his so-called ‘New Labour’ Party in 1997. I am only sad others couldn’t work him out sooner and fell for the globalist wretch’s alleged ‘charisma’.
Starmer gives off the vibes of those cold, calculating, Communist Party functionaries in the old Soviet Union. Yes, ‘nastiness’ as the media would define it can be found just as much, if not more so, in the Labour Party and their leaders as in the Britain’s classic ‘nasty’ party the Tories.
LikeLike
Wellsaid, that Green Party MP! The Greens are a hugely flawed party not least on account of the disconnection between being supposed defenders of the environment and being massively supportive of constant mass immigration but at least they want to replace our archaic, unfit for the 21st Century, deeply unfair and therefore highly undemocratic use of the ‘pure’ First Past The Post electoral system. The discrepancy between vote shares and seats in Parliament on July 4th 2024 was a complete national disgrace. It was the most disproportionate election result since 1885!
Their support of Proportional Representation is a good point about them as it is with the Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, the SNP and Plaid Cymru.
https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk
LikeLike
Really, we should have a new Parliament built. The House of Commons Chamber is supposedly too small for all 650 MPs to attend at once. Whilst the Parliament building is historic, of Grade 1 listed quality and is one of the most handsome Parliaments in the world (the Hungarian and Canadian parliamentary buildings being its only real rivals) the fact is we could do with a new one on account of its inadequate nature and that it is in a bad state of disrepair and is literally falling to pieces.
Australia built a fine new parliamentary building in 1988, India opened one last year and even Zimbabwe has one that will be soon. It is time we did so too whilst keeping the old one as a tourist attraction.
LikeLike
John:
Re. the Australian (Federal) Parliament building, I saw it (exterior only) in 1967 or 1968, when I was 10-11. A better building aesthetically than the much larger one that replaced it, but it became inadequate in size for its purpose, it seems.
“After World War I the Federal Capital Advisory Committee was established to prepare Canberra to be the seat of government, including the construction of a Parliament House. The committee decided that it would be best to erect a provisional building, to serve for a predicted 50 years until a new, permanent House could be built. In the end, Old Parliament House was Parliament’s home for 61 years. In the last decade of its use as a parliament, the building had a chronic shortage of available space.[2]” [Wikipedia]
Not everyone likes the new building:
“Don Watson, speechwriter for former Prime Minister Paul Keating, writes:[37]
‘The place lacks red blood cells. Beyond the chambers there is no sign of the great contest of ideas for which a national parliament exists. Unlike the old Parliament House where opponents bumped past each other in the corridors, met each other’s eyes, exchanged brutalities in the bar, stood side by side at urinals, in the new building the Opposition is separated from the Government by a divide as great as any which separates all of them from their constituents’.” [Wikipedia]
“Paul Keating has lamented walking the corridors of New Parliament House “not feeling like you were part of anything”.[36] Another former prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, expressed concern the “badly designed” structure lacks “collision space [that] brings people together to … compromise and agree and discuss. I think the design of the building definitely contributes to the fact that there are less cross-party friendships than there were in the old parliament”.[36] These concerns have been echoed by many former parliamentarians, including Malcolm Fraser,[31] Tom Uren,[33] Peter Walsh,[38][39] Barry Jones,[31] and Bob Carr.[32] Walsh, a former finance minister in the Hawke government has said the building is “an antiseptic, isolated and impersonal place, compared with its predecessor.”
“The Parliament House contains 4,700 rooms, and many areas are open to the public. The main foyer contains a marble staircase and leads to the Great Hall, which has a large tapestry on display based on the Arthur Boyd painting Untitled (Shoalhaven Landscape).[16] The House of Representatives chamber is decorated green, while the Senate chamber has a red colour scheme. Between the two chambers is the Members’ Hall, which has a water feature and is not open to the public. The executive wing houses the cabinet room, the Prime Minister’s Office and other ministerial offices.” [Wikipedia]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_House,_Canberra
LikeLike
Especially when that foreign leader is the PM of a continual international law defying state that has been condemned several times now by the International Court of Justice and is STILL allowed to ‘get away with it’.
LikeLike
The new leader of the Conservative Party, Nadine Dorries, should not only be brave and fearless but also have some vaguely conservative opinions – something markedly lacking in many ‘Tory’ MPs.
The party is in one last chance saloon territory now. No more liberal-left PC globalist nonsense! Nothing less than a sharp turn to the populist/nationalist ‘Right’ will do. Is there a ‘British Trump’ on the Tory backbenches? Trump seems to have been pretty successful in reimagining the US Republican Party.
Leave liberal-left PC globalist values to those who are most sincere and credible in espousing them ie Labour, Lib Dem and Greens.
The Conservative Party has no future as a third rate and more undemocratic version of the Liberal Democrats for wealthy people.
LikeLike
Here is a weird but funny story about two animals and their almost incredible friendship. We need stories (and videos) like these to not overdose on horrible news which seem to be our usual fare.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVbtAYPSapw
LikeLike
With regard to animal abuse: it’s worth remembering that the NSDAP banned experimentation on animals. Hitler and the Nazis were very pro-animal.
With regard to World War 3: Considering the Democrat implosion, some nationalists in America are starting to wonder if the (((zionists))) are trying to engineer Trump’s election, because Trump would have the credibility to start a war with Iran and/or China. If Biden or Harris started such a war, conservatives (the people most likely to enlist in the military) wouldn’t support it. But Trump has the blind support of the conservative base. Trump will also inspire patriotic feelings, getting lots of young White men to enlist and serve as cannon fodder. I’m not sure if I believe the “zionists are TRYING to get Trump elected” theory. But it is possible.
With regard to police brutality: stuff like this happens all the time in the USA. It only gets remembered if diversity are on the receiving end.
Most people don’t even remember that this happened:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Waco_shootout
Police in Texas opened fire from the rooftops on a meeting of motorcycle club members, killing 9 people and wounding 18.
The police then falsely claimed that the bikers had shot at them first.
The police arrested 177 bikers on felony charges, in an attempt to shift the blame for what happened onto the bikers. All of the charges were later dropped or dismissed.
None of the police officers were ever punished for massacring 9 people in broad daylight, firing from the rooftops down into a parking lot.
The bikers were hoping that when Trump became president, he would investigate the matter, but he didn’t.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
Thank you.
Yes, I recall the Waco siege. In fact, it started when I was still living in the USA (New Jersey) in 1993.
I have to say that I found the police whom I encountered in the USA rather pleasant and polite (FBI, DEA, NYPD, local police in New Jersey and, once, the Pennsylvania State highway patrol) but, there again, I was not a suspect or under arrest.
Re. the NSDAP (etc) and animal welfare, one of my earliest blog posts was about that:
LikeLike
“Is there a ‘British Trump’ on the Tory backbenches?”
Doesn’t seem to be.
And considering that the Tory MPs just elected “Open Borders Bob” Blackman as chairman of the 1922 committee, they seem to be doubling down on immigration, while hoping that their voters won’t notice.
(((Tugendhat))) the (((REDACTED))) pretending to be a “fellow Catholic” is on maneuvers, falsely claiming that he will withdraw from the ECHR to secure Britain’s borders. Needless to say, (((Tugendhat))) is a liar. He’s simply hoping that the Tory membership will be gullible enough to vote for him, not remembering that he was security minister during the highest immigration in British history.
And then there’s Robert Jenrick, who has said that his highest priority is “fighting anti-semitism.” Jenrick is basically the Tory version of Starmer. Both of them are married to (((REDACTED))) women, too.
Moving on, there’s James Cleverly (more like Stupidly). Not much to be said. An empty suit stuffed with (((globalist money))), just like Jenrick and (((Tugendhat))). Cleverly wouldn’t be getting any attention if he wasn’t black. Somebody also needs to tell him that his beard looks ridiculous.
Next up, there’s Priti Patel, the zionist agent. She got caught having secret meetings with israeli officials, but that has been swept under the carpet. Priti will no doubt pretend to be tough on immigration. The question is whether the Tory voters will be dumb enough to believe her. Considering that she got reelected, I think we know the answer to that question.
And then there’s Suella Braverman. She will be competing with Patel for votes from what passes as the “Tory right” these days.
Finally, there’s Kemi Badenoch, the African who has tried to make a name for herself with a “tough on woke” platform.
Oops, I forgot dull Mel Stride (more like Mel Walk Slowly). Not a surprise that I forgot him, since he is very forgettable. I suppose he will be trying to position himself as a moderate compromise candidate, after all the others tear each other apart.
Summing up, the candidates are: two Indians, two Africans, one (((REDACTED))), and two White guys, one of whom is married to a (((REDACTED))).
The lucky winner will have the honor of being William Hague 2.0, designated to lose the next election for the Tories.
The problem with all of these candidates is that they were all senior ministers in the Tory Shower of Sh*t Government that just got turfed out by the voters.
Why would Britain vote to put any of them back in power, when they created a gigantic mess the last time?
In recent years, when there is a change of parties in power, the new incoming Prime Minister tends to be someone who hasn’t previously been in government: Blair in 1997, (((Cameron))) in 2010, Starmer in 2024.
The advantage of being a political newcomer is that a newcomer can’t be blamed for the last government’s mess.
For example, Starmer wasn’t even an MP during the last Labour government.
If the Tories were smart, they would pick a backbencher who wasn’t a minister previously.
On the other hand, they don’t have many choices with only 121 MPs, some of whom have only just been elected for the first time.
I hope the Tories continue to implode, hopefully creating an opening for a truly patriotic party to emerge.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
Quite.
ps. thanks for the (((necessary, in a poundland police state))) redactions.
LikeLike
“ps. thanks for the (((necessary, in a poundland police state))) redactions.”
No problem at all! I don’t want anyone to get into trouble with the government.
I try my best to redact everything that needs it, but you should still check my posts to make sure I didn’t accidentally miss anything and forget to redact it.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
Thank you. The main things I have to redact are any suggestions that might amount to “incitement”, the way the English laws now are, or any too-frequently and/or too sharp criticisms of the “usual suspects”.
LikeLike
About the only Tory backbencher who could make for a plausible leader is Sir John Hayes who used to hold the safest Conservative Party-held seat in the country (I haven’t particularly looked at the results of the latest election so I have no idea of his seat’s safeness now but as is it is in the normally safe Tory county of Lincolnshire I presume he held it with a decent majority). He has ‘Right-wing’, traditionally socially conservative Tory opinions including being in favour of the death penalty being restored. God only knows how he managed to be selected for a non-marginal seat as it seems to me that the party has a deliberate policy of selecting liberal and/or ethnic candidates for safe seats.
None of their declared candidates for the leadership will do them much good. Probably only Robert Jenrick will not turn the public off entirely. If they go for James Cleverly (Thickerly), Priti Useless, Kemi Badenoch they may as well apply for the party to be deregistered with the Electoral Commission now. Kemi has an obsession with transsexuals and ‘gender ideology’ which is an issue but one which they have partially caused because they made marriage a gender-neutral institution but the party is mistaken if it thinks obsessing over gender ideology will move votes to them in huge numbers.
Out of the ethnics, Suella is best but she is still immensely flawed on account of her Zionist fanaticism and some other factors. She is very much a ‘Marmite’ character with the broader public but she does have some appeal amongst grassroots Tories.
As you say, their best bet would be to choose a competent unknown from the backbenches and start completely afresh.
There is no need to rush this leadership election. The party really needs to understand why it received the lowest number of votes ever and the lowest seat total since 1906.
LikeLike
John:
The Con timetable is already known. They intend to announce their new leader not long after their conference in, I think, November.
The only Con MP for whom I have any time at all is David Davis. He, however, is not a contender, again as far as I know.
I despise all of those involved with Israel or the Jew-Zionist lobby, i.e. all of the presently-known contenders. Furthermore, I would never countenance a non-white as potential PM. That leaves no-one.
“Ten Little Indians” or, in the original title, “Ten Little N*****s”…
ps. Jenrick is a nasty little individual, completely in the pocket of Jewish interests, and is corrupt. Frankly, I do not see him as very intelligent, either, for all his acquired money.
LikeLike
David Davies is far too much of a libertarian which needless to say too many Tory MPs subscribe to and which is an ideology that should be anathema to them as it is basically a form of liberalism. Frankly, it should come as no surprise they are in a very deep hole as a party and, consequently, don’t understand why they are in this mess.
Sir John Hayes or someone like him would be their best bet. If they continue with libertarian globalist values that will ensure they will never recover properly. This country has no need for a libertarian globalist party for just 10% of the population.
LikeLike
Well, they are doing it too quickly. If they think there is a magical ‘quick fix’ to their predicament which by the quickness of this timetable appears to be the case they couldn’t be more wrong. I would take up to a year to throughly comb over the results and try to understand what has gone wrong as the general election result was decades in the making and then select a new leader. They can’t afford to make any more mistakes.
LikeLike
John:
I think that both System parties are basically washed-up, but that the continuing momentum from the decades and centuries of history keep them both rolling, so far.
LikeLike
That the Conservative Party is rushing this contest unnecessarily and fielding a poor bunch of contenders so far (I don’t suppose someone like Sir John Hayes will enter the fray) indicates that they have learnt pretty much nothing from their recent drubbing. It is the height of arrogance to think it was a ‘normal’ defeat that can be rectified easily. It was a historic one with not just the lowest ever number of Tory MPs returned but also the lowest Tory share of the vote. They need to reflect upon those facts.
LikeLike