Morning music
Tweets seen
https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/what-did-you-expect-britains-protests
Goodwin has, however, left out one of the major causes— “them” (you-know-who)…
Barwell, an MP (2010-2017) who was mediocre at best, and who was removed by the voters after 7 years, only to be made a fake “lord” in the House of Lords section of the Westminster monkeyhouse. Oh, and Barwell is fanatically pro-mass immigration, too, despite the fact that his own former constituency, Croydon Central, has become an Afro-Caribbean swamp that becomes more violent, gang-ridden and crime-ridden daily. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Barwell.
More music
More tweets seen
While I understand, I think, his strategy, Russia should stand a little apart from outside influences, not being allied to, nor much influenced by, Arab or other Muslim interests or (needless to say) Jewish and Israeli interests.
More tweets
The last 2 days have seen pointless arguments: “was the killer at Southport Muslim or not?” (not, it seems), and “was the killer at Southport ‘British’ or not?” (no, not in the world of reality, but he was born in the UK to Africans). Also, “were the rioters in Leeds Muslim?” (no, Roma Gypsies). All a stupid and pointless media and social media circus.
Anyway, comment about the specific Southport perpetrator must now be limited by reason of someone having been charged and arraigned.
What really matters is the big picture— the failure of “multicultural” Britain. The fact that only 80% of the inhabitants of these islands are now white European, let alone British. Even in 1989 it was about 93%, and in the 1960s at least 95%.
In England specifically, well below that 80% figure, and in the big cities far far below.
“Foreign-born” is not a very accurate measure anyway. As we have seen, many non-whites are born in the UK, but more than that many non-whites are not only born in the UK, but are born to parents themselves born in the UK.
Disastrous for Britain’s future, including its near-future.
Statistics are being misapplied, and falsified anyway.
Just look around you.
What we are looking at is the upcoming slow collapse of what is still a semi-civilized society in the UK. It has already started to crack and distort.
I wonder whether Starmer’s wife has much direct influence over his political stances.
Starmer is behaving as though almost everyone in the UK voted Labour, and so (maybe) for him, when in fact only 4 voters out of every 12 that voted, voted Labour (only 4 out of 20 if all eligible voters are included).
Goodwin ought to address (including in his own mind) what (((element))) has always been and still is in the forefront of the conspiracy to import millions of backward non-Europeans into the UK.
He is quite right otherwise, of course.
Goodwin does not suggest what is most necessary though— the creation of a European ethnostate within the UK.
I agree with her, as far as that goes, but women should not be boxing anyway, even when they are both actual women and not, as in this case, one not a woman but a “trans” person.
Quite apart from that Kamala Harris fakery, look behind her, at her audience. At the demographics. America’s future?
I myself am probably on various tick-box lists already, thanks mainly to the “usual” malicious (((troublemakers))).
Starmer is a tyrant posing as a file clerk, or a file clerk suddenly gifted power.
That tyrannical idiot and his “Labour” colleagues have always supported the mass immigration which is this country’s major, prime, most pressing problem, and which impacts all areas, from crime and lawlessness through to housing, environment, overcrowded cities, low pay, the declining NHS, the slow collapse of the Welfare State etc, even the water shortage.
Try these:
https://rsarchive.org/Books/GA013/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditations_on_the_Tarot
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mein_Kampf_in_English
Maybe one less heavy? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Camp_of_the_Saints.
Perhaps a bit too true to life, that last, though?
“Out of the mouths of babes”?
Brava!
Rachel Reeves: expenses freeloader, moneygrasper and, of course, a fervent member of Labour Friends of Israel:
“Reeves is a vice-chair of Labour Friends of Israel,[84] contributed a chapter to a book about Israeli politics and society,[85] and supports the Auschwitz-Birkenau Foundation.[86][87] ” [Wikipedia].
The Labour “elected” tyranny is a complete “ZOG” (“Zionist Occupation Government”). Those who want to know what ZOG looks like in practice, look no further. Starmer-Labour.
In Leeds, the police caved to the Gypsy mob, in Southend the police seemed to be entirely absent as hundreds of blacks fought battles in the streets using machetes etc, but in Whitehall, the brave paramilitary police arrest a woman, said to be 61, for protesting against what is happening in this country.
A biased, “woke” police state, albeit so far, usually, a “poundland” one.
I do not agree with everything Katie Hopkins says, but I do agree with quite a bit of it (not, of course, her pro-Israelism). She does make me laugh, though.
Late tweets
Exactly.
…and what or who do you think stands behind Israel-puppet Starmer? That’s right…
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
“Britain’s protests reflect DECADES of elite failure.”
Matt Goodwin should know that it’s not elite failure, it’s elite TREASON.
For various reasons (mainly cowardice and greed) the British elite have chosen to align themselves with a (((malevolent tribe))) of (((hostile infiltrators))) who have taken over Britain and subjugated the British people.
In Britain as well as the USA, there is a trend among mainstream or semi-mainstream “patriot” commentators to accuse the elites of being incompetent, stupid, short-sighted, blundering, insane, etc.
These commentators say things such as “the Tories have bungled the immigration issue and failed to tackle the boats crossing the channel!”
Nothing could be further from the truth. The Tories (and Labour, etc) AREN’T incompetent or blundering. They haven’t bungled anything.
They are very competent and calculating indeed.
Everything is proceeding EXACTLY as the establishment parties and their (((owners))) want.
The open borders policies of the British government AREN’T a failure. These policies are a (((success))) for the (((implementers))).
These policies are doing EXACTLY what they are (((intended))) to do: overwhelm and replace White people in their own countries, and import armies of weaponized demographics who will be used as enforcers to enact White genocide.
That is the (((plan))), and so far it is working.
The Tories, Labour, and the other parties are carefully and obediently implementing this anti-White plan.
It is NOT an accident. It is NOT due to incompetence.
It is CALCULATED, INTENTIONAL, and DELIBERATE treason and genocide against the White race.
The mainstream-type commentators who accuse the government of incompetence are essentially giving cover to the traitor politicians, by portraying them as stupid rather than evil.
This confuses voters and makes them think that if only they elect someone COMPETENT, everything will get better.
The “our rulers are incompetent and stupid” accusation is a CON designed to deceive people into thinking that the system can be fixed.
“Just elect Jenrick/Patel/Tugendhat/Badenoch! They are COMPETENT and will solve the immigration crisis!”, the establishment commentators bleat, in an attempt to gaslight the voters away from realizing the (((real problem))).
As I said above, the truth is NOT that the politicians are incompetent. The politicians are very competent in implementing their (((owners’))) evil plan.
The truth is that the politicians are TRAITORS, and this should be shouted from the rooftops.
Accusing the politicians of being incompetent/stupid/morons/bunglers only obfuscates the (((real problem))), and diverts people from realizing what the (((real problem))) actually is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Friend of Britain:
That is, essentially, my own view too.
LikeLike
I agree with you too. However, they also are incompetent; we have just to listen to them. They are awfully ignorant. Having said that, the main problem is that they are vile TRAITORS.
LikeLike
Regarding Gavin Barwell, I hate him. He looks like a creep. Typical slick, ambitious, self-centered, greedy, immoral, traitorous, rootless cosmopolitan. In other words, a perfect representative of the modern Traitor Tory Party. Feel free to redact this paragraph if necessary.
Regarding Putin, I think he is looking to create an alliance of countries that oppose (((NATO))).
Putin realizes that (((NATO))) and its (((owners))) are completely out of control, and no longer even pretends to adhere to the international laws that (((NATO))) demands everyone else obey.
Take Syria for example: the USA (and probably Britain) has troops deployed and based on Syrian soil, in violation of Syrian national sovereignty, even though the internationally-recognized government of Syria doesn’t want (((NATO))) troops on Syrian soil. It’s an invasion, nothing less.
Another example is Ukraine: the Western puppet politicians claim that the pro-Russian areas of Ukraine such as Crimea have no right to secede from Ukraine, because these areas have been part of Ukraine since 1991. Meanwhile, these SAME politicians demand that China allow Taiwan to secede, even though Taiwan has been part of China for thousands of years. It’s utter hypocrisy.
And of course there is Iraq. The same politicians who invaded Iraq and murdered countless Iraqis, are claiming that Putin is a monster for invading Ukraine.
The message from the hypocritical corrupt Western politicians is: “war crimes are fine when we do them!”
The Russians and the Chinese and many other countries are very tired of living under an international system where only they have to follow the rules, while the (((REDACTED)))-controlled Western countries do whatever they want, blatantly trampling over the sovereignty of the Serbians, the Iraqis, the Syrians, and Yemenis, the Palestinians, and countless others.
I would not be surprised to see a new Eastern Bloc style alliance be formed, as a deterrent to (((NATO))) aggression.
This alliance could be formed under the auspices of the Russian-led CSTO, or the Chinese-led Shanghai Cooperation Organization, or the multi-national BRICS.
This alliance might consist of some or all of the following countries:
-Russia
-China
-India
-Indonesia
-Turkey (if they leave NATO)
-Brazil
-Algeria
-North Korea
-Iran
-Syria
-Belarus
-South Africa
-Venezuela
-Bolivia
-Burma/Myanmar
-Pakistan
-Vietnam
-Laos
-Cuba
-Bengladesh
-Afghanistan and possibly other countries in Central Asia (Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, etc)
-Zimbabwe, Mali, Niger, Sudan, Angola, Mozambique, and various other African countries.
There will be some issues in creating such an alliance. For example India and Pakistan hate each other, and China and Vietnam distrust each other.
And an alliance with numerous Tier 1 powers (Russia, China, India) might have leadership disputes over who is in charge.
But such an alliance might be the only way that the Eastern countries can defend themselves from all being invaded/couped/overthrown one by one, and turned into (((NATO))) puppet states.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Friend of Britain:
Yes, it seems to me (too) that Putin is creating a general, loose, alliance of non-NATO states. He is making a massive and slow strategic move.
In the end, in terms of real power on the world scale, there is only the triad of USA (sub nom NATO), Russia, and China. We are in a version of what Orwell predicted in Nineteen Eighty-Four. Russia + China v. USA/NATO, at present.
LikeLike
What “Friend of Britain” said with regard to the Russian foreign policy is correct. However many of those countries mentioned do not have any importance, either economic or political. The only powerful ones are China, India and Brazil. The latter has always followed an ambivalent but clever policy, usually going along with the US (as they did in WW2).
Brazil is a rather prosperous country with a powerful national industry. Forget the financial jargon of this report, the fact is Brazil is strong and will continue to grow.
https://www.fitchratings.com/research/sovereigns/fitch-affirms-brazil-at-bb-outlook-stable-27-06-2024#:~:text=Stable%20Outlook%3A%20Brazil's%20ratings%20are,low%20foreign%2Dcurrency%20debt%20share.
LikeLike
Claudius:
On the other hand, there is the old and rather sarcastic saying, “Brazil is the country of the future— and always will be!”…
LikeLike
I have the same feelings for Katie Hopkins, she is very eloquent and witty and is spot on on many issues; unfortunately, she repeats the same nonsense as Mr Goodwin, Farage and GB News (i.e.: the only problem is the Muslims.) Talk about not noticing the elephant in the room!
LikeLike
I also agree with your opinion about Katie Hopkins. She is spot-on on many issues, witty and fairly eloquent in a sarcastic way but, unfortunately, she keeps parroting the same slogan favoured by Farage, Goodwin, GB News and similar pro-Jewish puppets: “Our only problem is the Muslims”
LikeLike