Morning music
Tweets seen
FPTP voting being the illogical and unfair thing that it is, those figures would result in a similar number of seats (for the English parties) as at GE 2024, according to Electoral Calculus.
If, however, Labour went down to 28% and Reform UK went up to 24%, the latter might have 48 MPs. Also, Labour would be a minority government.
Despite the evident hopeless incompetence of Starmer-Labour, the pseudo-Conservative Party shows no immediate sign of being able to mount a serious challenge.
I wonder what percentage are from the (((usual))) suspects?
I once knew someone whose ex-boyfriend, English and a Cambridge graduate, worked for the World Bank. That young man was sent to live in Yemen (at that time divided into two; I am not sure but think this would have been South Yemen). That would have been in the mid/late 1970s. The young man lived in fairly basic hotel accommodation for the year in which he was collecting and collating economic statistics in Yemen. At the end of the year, those would be the raw material for a report which would become an official World Bank report and the basis for economic help to that Yemeni state.
This was, of course, in pre-Internet days, and the statistics gathered in were all on paper in his hotel room. No copies, and there was no way, in the absence of an office, to relay any but the most basic information to World Bank HQ in Washington D.C.
At the end of the year, that young World Bank employee was ready to depart, carrying with him all the papers and files etc. It was at that point when a water pipe in his room developed a bad leak while he was out. The room was flooded, and most of the material destroyed.
On return to Washington, the young man sat in his office for a couple of weeks, agonizing about what to do. Eventually, a senior colleague came in and asked him what the problem was. He confessed. The senior colleague helped him to cobble together a report that looked plausible, though most of the statistics had to be simply invented.
“World Bank”. Like many things, organizations and people in this world, it sounds terribly impressive. On the surface…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yemen#Two_states
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank
As to the “young man” in question, I myself met him only once, when he was not that young anymore. Early 1980s. I was about 26, my then girlfriend 33, and the “young man” in this story about 33 or 34, maybe 35. He, on a flying visit, invited us, with a couple of others, also ex-Cambridge alumni (as always, I was the outsider) to dinner at a Chinese restaurant, I think on the Finchley Road, not far from where the other couple lived in Hampstead.
The economist’s American wife was back in the USA. Perhaps he was curious to see his ex-girlfriend’s new boyfriend. It could have been a little awkward, especially in view of the fact that there was an age gap made greater by the others being all rather established in worldly life, whereas I was pretty much “economically inactive”, and spending most of my time on occult, theological, historical, and speculative “alternative” political matters.
In the event, the evening went not badly, despite (maybe because) I was too busy talking to notice that I was pouring hot Chinese tea all over myself; the (other) lady present said that it was very impressive that I did not cry out. Very dry, very Cambridge…
I just looked up the said economist. Now in, at least, his mid-seventies, he has apparently also worked for the U.S. Treasury and on Wall Street, and has taken part at a high level in meetings of the Basel Committee [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_Committee_on_Banking_Supervision]. Obviously still based, in the old term, “stateside”.
As always, I find it interesting to see how people’s lives are largely determined, not in every case but in many, by their advantages and disadvantages of birth, family income and capital, early education etc.
The economist’s father, I now see (from Wikipedia), died in 1988 and, as I already knew, was a Labour (later SDP) life peer, who had had a considerable medical, academic, and political career.
In the end, all humans live out an allotted span, and all in the end leave the Earth (until reincarnated).
Temps perdu…
The continuing slide of the UK down a dystopian slope
…or, as Katie Hopkins calls it, “Batshit Bonkers Britain“.
A few examples from today’s newspapers:
“A geography professor at a leading British university has described the study of rocks and the natural world as racist and linked the academic field to ‘white supremacy’.
Kathryn Yusoff, who lectures at the prestigious Queen Mary University of London, said that the geology as a subject was ‘riven by systematic racism’ and influenced heavily by colonialism.
The study of prehistoric life through fossils was also branded as an enabler for racism, with the professor referring to the field of palaeontology as ‘pale-ontology’.”
[Daily Mail]
“I am a transdisciplinary geographer focused on inhuman geographies. I understand the inhuman as a place from which to think about earthly relations and inhumane histories. Theoretically, I engage historical, geophilosophical and black feminist methods to speak to issues of environmental change, empires of geologic practices and the politics of planetary states.
Specifically, I am interested in the role of inhuman epistemologies in race, gender, and subjectivity for more equitable environmental world-building.“
[https://www.qmul.ac.uk/geog/staff/yusoffk.html]
“Professor of Inhuman Geography“? You couldn’t make it up.
“Transdisciplinary” maybe; I think “trans” something else, too.
Enemies of European culture and civilization riddle our universities, the legal professions, politics etc.
There is a limit to what I can express on the blog. Suffice to say that Britain (and all Europe) will not free itself from this sort of nonsense via “debate” (which that sort expressly do not want anyway). ‘Nuff said.
“A record number of asylum seekers have managed to secure their stay in the UK by claiming to be gay, official figures have revealed.
The figure almost trebled last year from 762 in 2022 to 2133 in 2023, of people who could demonstrate that returning to their homeland would be inhumane because of their sexuality.
Under the European Convention of Human Rights people who may be persecuted because of their sexual orientation can claim asylum in the UK.
Eight countries saw 100 per cent of claims were successful. These were people from Afghanistan, El Salvador, Syria, Eritrea, Myanmar (Burma), Libya, St Vincent and the Grenadines, and Yemen.
While Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nigeria saw the largest number of successful applicants.“
[Daily Mail].
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14091637/Trans-men-lesbians-IVF-priority-NHS.html
“Family campaigners have criticised as ‘grossly discriminatory’ plans to give trans men and lesbians access to NHS-funded IVF two years ahead of heterosexual couples.
Under the controversial proposals, trans men – those born as women who now identify as men – will be automatically assumed to be unable to conceive, as will lesbians and single women.“
[Daily Mail]
Need one even comment?
Still clapping?
“Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of hypocrisy after it was revealed the UK sent an incredible 470 delegates to the UN climate change summit in Azerbaijan.
Britain’s huge delegation to the COP29 talks has left a massive carbon footprint – despite Labour‘s zealous drive towards Net Zero – and cost taxpayers millions.
The staggering environmental and financial cost comes despite the summit being deemed ‘no longer fit for purpose’, with leaders of some of the biggest polluting countries, including US President Joe Biden and China‘s President Xi, shunning talks.“
[Daily Mail]
Apart from anything else, without oil production the Azeris would be dirt-poor, as indeed they were before the discovery of oil over a century ago. Are they likely to go along with the “stop oil” nonsense? I doubt it.
More from the newspapers
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14090921/Britains-aircraft-carriers-sunk-war-games.html
“Britain’s recently built multi-billion pound aircraft carriers may already be out of date, with military sources revealing that the carries [sic] get sunk ‘in most war games’.
At present, the Royal Navy boasts two £6.2 billion aircraft carriers, the HMS Queen Elizabeth and the HMS Prince of Wales, which were only commissioned into service in 2017 and 2019 respectively.
However, given the constant advancements in weapon technology, the ships may now be too susceptible to modern missiles to prove effective in wartime operation.“
[Daily Mail]
As predicted years ago by both accredited “military/naval experts” and, inter alia, me (on this blog).
…and the Harehills (Leeds) riots were not “Romanian”, either.
Never confuse real Romanians with Roma Gypsies, which are (mostly) a kind of criminal underclass who live in Romania (and also now in the UK, thanks to our traitor politicians), may have Romanian passports, but are not Romanian an sich.
Romanians are, understandably, offended by being constantly conflated, usually by ignorant UK newspaper scribblers and TV talking heads, with the Roma Gypsies.
So Farage has now not only vehemently supported Israel and the UK Jewish/Zionist lobby, but also seems to be saying that Muslims in the UK should not be alienated politically either. The man is, as often said, a snake-oil salesman but, having said that, I would not rule out the chance of him becoming a Cabinet minister in some kind of coalition government after 2029.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1837402567803826567
See also my very popular article on the connection between mental illness and, on the one hand, self-describing “Leftism” and “antifa” and, on the other hand, Jewish and non-Jewish Zionism: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/07/18/theyre-coming-to-take-me-away-ha-ha/.
Good.
That is what the Jewish state has done to Gaza in just over one year.
Quasi-legal thought
It occurs to me that, should anyone in the UK be accused of any indictable offence (meaning, simply put, one in which guilt will be determined by a jury rather than a single magistrate —or lay bench— as is the case with non-indictable offences), and if that alleged offence involves alleged hostility to Jews, or the Jews in general, the said defendant might be able to count on popular disgust at what the Jewish state of Israel is doing in Gaza to sway the jury. Just “a thought out of season”…
“Map of the Ukraine: a massive strike by the Russian Armed Forces on objects Ukraine using missiles and kamikaze drones.”
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
I was confused by the comment about Bluesky and I looked it up on Google, here is what I found in the website of that hateful rag known as “The Guardian” (the highlighted sentence is mine)
“Bluesky began as a project inside Twitter, after its chief executive, Jack Dorsey, announced in 2019 that the company would fund developers to create an “open and decentralised standard for social media”. Bluesky became an independent company in 2021 and is now primarily owned by the chief executive, Jay Graber.“
LikeLike
Claudius:
Yes. That “Bluesky” site has had large numbers of Zionist Jews, “antifa”-type idiots, the (often self-describing) “woke” idiots etc flock to it, while the same rabble(s) have often closed down or even deleted their Twitter/X accounts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That does not surprise me considering the name of its owner: Jay (((Graber))) Every-Single-Time (LOL)
LikeLike
Going back to Uri Geller, I thought he did bend the spoons using mental power or energy but my wife told me he used to rub them with his fingers which already sounded suspicious. This morning I did a bit if research and found this (the parts in bold are mine):
James Randi, also known as The Amazing Randi, spent years investigating and disproving claims of psychics, paranormal conjurers and offered one million dollars to anyone who could prove paranormal abilities. A prize tgat was still unclaimed when Randi passed away in 2020. Randi labeled Uri Geller a charming fraud, and in numerous lawsuits, Geller never prevailed. From the Wikipedia article on Randi:
“In May 1991, Geller sued Randi and CSICOP for $15 million on a charge of slander, after Randi told the International Herald Tribune that Geller had “tricked even reputable scientists” with stunts that “are the kind that used to be on the back of cereal boxes”, referring to the old spoon-bending trick. The court dismissed the case and Geller had to settle at a cost to him of $120,000, after Randi produced a cereal box which bore instructions on how to do the spoon-bending trick. Geller’s lawyer Don Katz was disbarred mid-way into this action and Geller ended up suing him. After failing to pay by the deadline imposed by the court, Geller was sanctioned an additional $20,000.”
Obviously, Don Katz was another Mark Lewis (LOL)
LikeLike
Claudius:
Not sure about spoonbending, but when Geller’s TV spectacular was broadcast in the UK in 1971/1972 or thereabouts, he claimed that his powers could and would make clocks or watches (broken or stopped) start at a certain time (the show being broadcast live). I recall that a couple of boys in my class at school claimed that their clocks at home started to work as promised; my wife also remembers that an old clock, owned by her mother, and which had been broken for some time, started to work again.
Whether one attributes that to Geller himself, or to the working of the mass mind, or even simple co-incidence, it is certainly of interest.
I have noted on the blog the desirability of a kind of SS-Ahnenerbe in the UK, tasked with investigating not only history and prehistory (like the original organization) but also psychic phenomena, powers of the mind, magic, occultism generally and, above all, how to prepare the world for a quantum leap in evolution.
Incidentally, that James Randi character was himself not very reliable.
LikeLike
James Randi, pun not intended, (LOL) was a rather shady character but the fact is that he dedicated most of his later years to discover and exposed charlatans and fakes and he was very serious. He promised a prize of 1.000.000 dollars to whom could demonstrate his/her supernatural psychic powers were real and no one could do it.
LikeLike
Claudius:
If I were to claim that I can see angelic beings (for example), how *could* that be proven “under laboratory conditions” (or otherwise)?
I concede that the metaphysical public space contains innumerable fakes and deluded persons, of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I am gay” the modern day open sesame.
Record numbers of asylum seekers have been allowed to stay in Britain after claiming they are gay, official figures reveal
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14091703/Official-figures-reveal-record-numbers-asylum-seekers-claiming-gay-sceptics-saying-seeking-lie-flout-ECHR-rules.html
LikeLike
What a complete farce! Literally millions of people could claim ‘asylum’ from all around the world and come to Britain on that basis. Being LGBT is not a sufficient reason to claim asylum and at any rate people could just say that. What is the test for proving an ‘asylum seeker’ actually has same-sex attractions?
Are we going to be flooded with Italian ‘asylum seekers’ or Japanese/South Korean ones on that basis as all three of those countries are not 100% in agreement with LGBT rights:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Japan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_South_Korea
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Italy
LikeLike
We can’t send homosexuals back to their country of origin if that country has the death penalty for homosexuality.
It would be good to know how many of these men have wives and children a few years after arriving here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So choosing the strange immigrant African woman with an obsession about the 0.5% of the population (one in every 200 people) who are transexuals and who wishes to either cut out entirely or reduce the value of maternity pay/benefit for that part of the populace who are female ie around 50% has NOT led to any increase in the ‘Tory’ vote share. Who would have easily predicted that?
The recent farcical leadership election was quite simple. If they were going for the liberal-left globalist, Lib Dem and Labour-leaning vote then Tom Tugendhat was the person to go for. He is quite presentable and plausible as a potential PM. Also, he is relatively unknown to the public. Alternatively, the ‘Right-wing’ choice was obviously Robert Jenrick who had a clear ‘Right-wing’ policy agenda of getting us out of the European Convention on Human Rights. Jenrick also had the advantage of being not well known amongst the public and not really being associated with the common opinion of the last government being a failure as he wasn’t a prominent Cabinet member.
The next best bet would have been Cleverly who doesn’t have much in the way of a defined political ideology and can therefore appear quite inoffensive to many. He isn’t abrasive or overly argumentative as a person so he is less likely to put people’s backs up as Kemi will.
LikeLike
John:
Tugendhat was “presentable” to many middleaged and elderly people because (despite being part-Jew) he looks and sounds British. I think I understand that, I myself having been born in 1956. He might have gone the distance had the Con MPs selected him as one of the final two. They didn’t.
Kemi Badenoch is basically foreign, not only by reason of race, albeit sounding like she was brought up here though she was not (until aged 16).
Jenrick was too obviously mendacious, not to be trusted.
As you say, and that tweeter too, there has been no “Badenoch Bounce”, and will not be.
This government is already hated and despised, after only 5 months. Unsurprising, when (as I keep pointing out on the blog) only 4 out of 20 eligible voters voted for it in the first place. Some say that the 8 out of 20 who did not vote are unimportant and have no right to say anything, but that bloc of (non-) voters are people, mostly, disenchanted with all the choices on offer. They are *over* 40% of the entire electorate. That cannot be ignored.
I could imagine that, at GE 2029, the Cons might still be trailing on about 25%, Lab also around that level, and Reform UK rising to about the same level of support. On that basis, there might well be formed a coalition, maybe Con/Reform. Not impossible. Many might clutch at the Farage straw…
LikeLiked by 1 person
With regard to Olukemi Olofunto Adegoke Badenoch:
There are multiple factors at play that explain why she made it to the final round and became Tory leader.
The first thing to remember is that the Traitor Tory MPs are told who to vote for by their (((string pullers))). And the (((string pullers))) are working 24/7 to move the Overton Window in the anti-White direction. Since Olukemi is the most blatantly un-British and the most non-White looking and has the most un-White name out of all the candidates, the (((malevolent tribe))) undoubtedly instructed (((their))) puppet MPs to vote for her, because putting her in charge of the so-called “Conservative” Party is a symbol of how anti-White modern Britain has become, and the (((malevolent tribe))) wants to destroy any remaining bastions of Whiteness.
Thus, installing Olukemi as leader of the Tory Party (which historically has the support of traditional-minded White voters) is a big symbolic win for the (((malevolent tribe))), because an institution that historically was perceived as standing for traditional values is now headed by an African with a strange name. Thus, the (((malevolent tribe))) has toppled yet another symbolic bastion of Whiteness.
Of course, informed people know that the Tories have been anti-White for decades. But the symbolism of putting a foreign African as leader of the “Conservatives” is a psychological win for the (((malevolent tribe))), since a long-standing institution that historically was dominated by Whites is now openly controlled by the Diversity.
The (((malevolent tribe))) installed Sunak as Prime Minister for the same reason: the symbolism. The previous Prime Ministers such as (((Johnson))), Truss, etc were certainly as obedient puppets as Sunak. But installing a visibly non-White individual with a foreign name and a foreign religion as Prime Minister of Britain was a huge symbolic statement from the (((malevolent tribe))), designed to gloat and show the British people that they have been (((conquered))) by triumphant Diversity.
The symbolism of installing Sunak as Prime Minister sent the message to Whites: “you aren’t in charge of Britain anymore. The (((Diversity))) is in charge now. You have been defeated.”
The symbolism is meant to demoralize and discourage traditional-minded Whites, while encouraging and motivating the weaponized Diversity to finish their conquest of Britain.
That is precisely why Sunak was (((installed))) as Prime Minister.
The installation of Badenoch serves a similar purpose. Two blatant foreigners in a row as Tory leader is intended as a statement of triumph by the (((malevolent tribe))). The intent is to gloat and show traditional-minded Whites that the Tory Party doesn’t belong to them anymore, and that they have been conquered.
Let’s not forget how far the (((malevolent tribe))) has moved the Overton Window in the anti-White direction over the past 15 years.
In Gordon Brown’s cabinet, there was only 1 visible minority: the Attorney-General Patricia Scotland.
In (((David Cameron’s))) cabinet, there was only 1 visible minority: Sayeeda Wars, who held only a very minor position.
Fast forward to Sunak’s government, where visible minorities held 3 out of the 4 top offices in government, and the one token White person (Jeremy Hunt) is married to a Chinese woman.
That’s how far the (((malevolent tribe))) moved the Overton Window in the anti-White direction, in just 14 short years.
Britain went from having an almost all-White government, to having a government where 3 out of the top 4 office-holders were minorities.
The same effect can be seen in the social sphere. Recently I watched some footage of Princess Diana’s funeral. Almost all the members of the British establishment in attendance were White.
Fast forward to the coronation of King Charles, where the new “British” establishment is full of non-White faces.
Again, that shows how far the (((malevolent tribe))) has moved the Overton Window in the anti-White direction. The “British” establishment now consists largely of foreigners, which of course allows the (((malevolent tribe))) to camouflage (((themselves))) more easily and avoid scrutiny.
The elevation of people such as Sunak and Olukemi to high office is by (((design))). The (((intent))) is to make White people feel unwelcome and uncomfortable in (((modern society))), to demoralize the Whites who still adhere to traditional values, and to embolden the Diversity to complete the conquest of White countries.
That is why Olukemi was (((selected))) for the final round of the Tory leadership race.
It’s the same reason that most advertisements these days feature non-Whites and/or people in mixed-race relationships.
Olukemi will be a weak party leader and will not win many votes, but the (((string pullers))) don’t care, because (((they))) control the Labor Party and the Liberal Democrats, so (((they))) win regardless of who the people vote for.
I have no doubt that the installation of Olukemi was by (((design))).
(((They))) picked Robert “turbo-zionist” Jenrick as a backup candidate, to make sure that (((they))) benefitted either way.
Olukemi wins: (((they))) enjoy the triumphalist symbolism of two foreign leaders in a row at the top of a party that was historically perceived as a bastion of British nationalism.
Jenrick wins: (((they))) enjoy the triumphalist symbolism of (((REDACTED))) stars at every entrance to the UK.
Thus, (((they))) win either way.
A significant percentage of the Tory membership now consists of London-based (((REDACTEDS))) who have signed up as members to use the Tory Party as a vehicle to advance (((REDACTED))) supremacy.
Thus, the (((REDACTEDS))) are not only the money-controllers and bankrollers of the Tory Party, but also a significant percentage of the general membership.
Which explains why the Tory Party is so fanatically anti-White.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
I have to agree.
Incidentally, I saw a few seconds, maybe a minute, of a news report on TV recently: the King visited some school, I think in South London. Most of the officials and teachers were white/English, but the pupils chosen to talk with the King and say something on TV were all blacks, mostly girls. As it happens, the few I saw (probably carefully-selected) were charming and smartly-dressed, but the point is that here is a school, in London, and there seem to be virtually no English children at all. The demographic likely future.
LikeLike
Interesting video and commentary on British social housing i.e. council houses.
My opinion on council houses is somewhat different from the lady who made the video, she is starry eyed about her experience of living in one.
Usually built of inferior materials, badly insulated and with very thin interior walls, they were probably nice when new, or if the tenants were house proud and maintained them well, however, there are some who wouldn’t care about the state of their home. Council homes often had gardens and other advantages such as subsidised utilities and low rent.
I have never lived in a council house, nor anyone in my family, so I am not the best judge. Such homes are not built anymore, I think the Government finally realised they were a draw to people from outside who thought they too could have a free home and 20 years ago many did. Send a man over here, be homeless, a few months later get the key to your new home. Bring family over or live somewhere very cheap and rent out your new home.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmMut7QJpQA
LikeLike
Social housing is still needed though for Britons. Mrs Thatcher allowed them to be bought under the ‘Right to Buy’ policy which wasn’t a terrible idea in itself but she should have allowed the proceeds to be re-invested in building new homes.
There are some people who will never be able to purchase a private property through lack of sufficient funds but they still need somewhere to live. This issue of housing and in particular housing for the poorer section of society is one reason amongst many as to why we need to be remorselessly tough on immigration.
LikeLike
There is a ruse to get a council house/flat with right to buy. A website called Homeswappers gives social housing tenants the chance to register their home and use the website to search for a property in an area they prefer and swap homes. There are thousands of homes on the website and most people have an honest reason to want to relocate, but there are plenty on the site seeking a property with right to buy specifically so those are snapped up right away.
Our Gov’ are stupid, at least, they are not as clever as the incomers. Back in the 00’s when Iraqi refugees were arriving, there was sufficient social housing stock in London to house them. What the refugees did was very quickly catch on that they could relocate to somewhere cheap i.e. Grimsby and rent out their property in London at a profit. It took YEARS for them to be found out.
Another trick was Somalis going to housing and claiming their husband had left them and gone back to Somalia. They would borrow children from friends and relatives and go to get housed. Of course they got the biggest properties with so many children. Councils had to bring in DNA testing when they finally realised they were being conned. One woman told me that she went to the housing department to say her husband had left her, but she actually took her husband with her to be a translator. with him claiming he was her cousin.
We are being outwitted at every stage.
LikeLike
Muslims are very unlikely to vote in appreciable numbers for Reform UK nor the fake Conservative Party and they certainly will not if those parties support the quasi-terroristic, continual international law defying, bandit state of Israel as both parties do.
Muslims are more likely to vote for the Green Party, abstain, or vote for an independent as the July general election showed.
Yes, that tweeter is correct in saying that Farage is making a grave mistake. Reform UK’s biggest issue should be being opposed to mass immigration. That was the issue that was the prime one thrusting Reform UK into orbit in July. Without it they would have performed worse.
LikeLike
John:
Yes. Why single out Muslims from other non-Europeans? Yes, they do provide a disproportionately-high number of imprisoned criminals, social security recipients etc, but not much more (if at all) than, say, West Indians, though the exact figures are now concealed (tellingly).
The fact is that the “Parliamentary road” is probably a dead end for social national parties; Reform UK is not social-national anyway; at best, “conservative nationalist”. Same factors apply, though.
As the proportion of non-Europeans grows in the UK, the chances of any “nationalist” political candidate getting elected diminishes. 2029 may be Reform UK’s last chance, because there will still be enough constituencies around with mainly English voters.
LikeLike
If Reform UK is sensible they will go a bit further to the ‘Right’ so that the party is similar to Germany’s AfD party thus establishing ‘clear blue water’ between them and the useless, globalist, failed idiots of what was the Conservative Party. The Tory Party can then scramble around in the dirt attempting to gain votes from people who would rather cut their own throats than vote Conservative.
Even Mrs Thatcher would never recognise today’s Conservative Party let alone previous Tory leaders.
LikeLiked by 1 person
John:
Yes. The Conservative Party is dead on its feet after 14 years of incredibly poor misgovernment. Large areas of the country (England and Wales) will never again vote Con as they did in 2019. Labour has already broken trust and, likewise, offers those large areas of the country nothing, especially on immigration but also on living standards, housing, law and order etc.
It is an open goal for Reform UK and would be for a real social-national party, if one existed.
Yes, FPTP is just illogical and stupid, as well as unfair, but the bottom line is that Labour, with its fake “landslide”, only secured the votes of 4 out of every 12 voters who voted, and only 4 out of 20 eligible voters. It is worth remembering that Labour only got just over twice the number of votes that Reform UK received at GE 2024. The 402 Labour MPs may look impressive (as a number) as against the 5 MPs of Reform UK, but Reform UK got almost half the number of votes secured by Labour.
It is not impossible that the Cons will continue to flounder in the shallows, that Labour will continue to be hated, or feared, and despised by the vast majority of citizens, and that, therefore, Reform UK will have a chance to hoover a large number of constituencies. 100 MPs is not impossible at GE 2029; a cadre of ~50 MPs is —on present showing— almost nailed on.
LikeLike
“It is an open goal for Reform UK and would be for a real social-national party, if one existed.”
I don’t understand why one doesn’t exist. The leaders of the social-national movements, such as the BNP, Patriotic Alternative, Britain First, National Support Detachment, etc need to put aside their differences and unite to fight for national survival.
If they aren’t able to merge into a single party, then they should fight the next election as a coalition with a joint electoral list.
In addition to providing a Pro-White option for voters, the existence of a Pro-White party will also serve another very important purpose: namely, it will pressure Reform from the right, thus preventing Reform from moving toward the center (which is already happening, with Farage praising islam).
A viable Pro-White party would put pressure on Reform to move to the right, for fear of losing voters.
With regard to Farage, I wouldn’t be surprised if he sabotages Reform from within and eventually jumps ship, like he did with UKIP when UKIP showed signs of opposing the islamic invasion of Britain.
Farage is a grifter and a traitor. But he’s useful at the present time, since he is weakening and damaging the Traitor Tory Party. Anything that destroys the Traitor Tories is useful, because the psychological hold that the Traitor Tories have over millions of patriotic voters needs to be broken.
Once the Traitor Tories are consigned to the trash can, hopefully a social-national party can emerge and win the votes of former Tory voters.
Right now, the most important thing is to relentlessly continue pushing the Overton Window in the Pro-White direction.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
While I should like to agree with you about the “list” idea, in fact British people want to vote for *one* party, not a loose coalition of parties.
I had not even heard of the “National Support Detachment” you mention.
I agree about pushing the “Overton Window”, of course.
I think that, if and when the majority of the British people are suffering enough, a vanguard element of those people, even if only a few thousand strong, could present (one way of another) an attractive alternative to the System.
LikeLike
Apart from drug dealing and those utterly disgraceful and repellent gang rapes they do so often, muslims commit no more crimes than blacks do. Muslims are not the stabbers in our former capital city of London. Blacks in that city are primarily responsible for its disturbing stabbing rate though at least they normally tend to stab each other rather than Britons. However, we have to pay high taxes to employ gormless PC Stazi/Poundshop Gestapo idiots to try to keep that crime rate under some form of control and I resent having to pay those taxes.
LikeLike
Yes, it is offensive to compare Romanians and indeed Slovaks as well to Roma Gypsies. Clearly, there is a difference between Europeans like Romanians and Slovaks and a race of people who originate from outside of our Continent.
LikeLike
John:
Once again, the System msm just lies, either brazenly or by omitting the true facts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For some reason, the “Reply” button isn’t showing on some posts, so I couldn’t directly reply to your post above.
Regarding the National Support Detachment, it is a small group led by a former British Army soldier named Alek Yerbury. He is quite a strong speaker.
I think the above video is the right one. For some reason YouTube wants me to sign in to watch it, which I am not willing to do LOL. But I think it’s the video of one of his good speeches.
Of course, his penchant for dressing like Hitler (and the Hitler-style mustache) are detrimental to his chances of becoming more mainstream.
The majority of patriotic British voters still believe heavily in the WW2 lies that they have been taught for decades.
Also, the name of his group (“National Support Detachment”) and their practice of assigning military-style ranks to the members is very unlikely to attract widespread support.
But I do think he’s a very strong speaker. If he shaves off the Hitler mustache and changes the name of his group to something non-paramilitary sounding, he could go far in the right political environment.
Another strong speaker is Mark Collett of Patriotic Alternative.
LikeLike
Some thoughts:
“Katie Hopkins calls it, “Batshit Bonkers Britain“.”
I see that Katie, like Matt Goodwin, is intentionally gaslighting the British people into wrongly believing that the destruction of their country is an accident, rather than an (((intentional criminal act))).
The traitor-politicians aren’t bonkers or incompetent. They are evil. The destruction of Britain isn’t an random act of insanity. Rather, it is a (((planned act of genocide))).
“A geography professor at a leading British university has described the study of rocks and the natural world as racist and linked the academic field to ‘white supremacy’. Kathryn Yusoff,”
Yusoff, huh? What an interesting surname. One wonders if Professor Yusoff is a member of the (((malevolent tribe))). Probably the descendant of “refugees” who came to Britain during the 1930s/40s, and now shows her “gratitude” to the people who took her in, by relentlessly trying to genocide the British people who (foolishly) gave refuge to her ancestors.
Regarding Nigel Farage: he’s a grifting traitor and always has been. As he openly admits, his goal is to serve the (((establishment))) as a harmless safety valve, diverting patriotic White British people from supporting movements that are actually Pro-White and will actually save Britain from destruction.
islam, like many (((other things))), is inherently un-British and un-European, and does not belong in Britain nor anywhere in Europe. The ONLY reason islam is present in Britain and Europe, is because the (((malevolent tribe))) used (((their))) control over the traitor-politicians to open the borders and let islam in.
Farage is useful to the British Patriot movement, only because he is discrediting and damaging the Traitor Tory party, thus freeing the mindless Tory generational voters from their unthinking and instinctive (and misplaced) loyalty to the Traitor Tory Party.
Once the Traitor Tory Party is electorally destroyed, the idiot Thatcher-worshipping Tory voters in Surrey and Sussex will be mentally free to switch their support to a new party.
The Reform Party doesn’t have the nationwide organization, the institutional strength, or the centuries-old history of the Tory Party. Hence, the former Tory voters may vote Reform, but they will not have any deep-seated instinctive loyalty to Reform.
Thus, it will be easier to get patriotic voters to switch from Reform to a Pro-White party, than it was to break their mindless attachment to the Tory Party and get them to switch to Reform.
The current task for British patriots should be to relentlessly move the Overton Window as far as possible to the right.
As Farage admitted, “if you speak the unspeakable, people will begin to think the unthinkable.”
Relentlessly push the Overton Window to the right. Criticize the Reform Party for not being patriotic or nationalistic enough. Criticize the Reform Party for their lack of loyalty to the indigenous White British population. Relentlessly push the Overton Window in the Pro-White direction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent analysis. Yes, it is a pity that someone as charismatic and witty as Katie Hopkins does not mention who the real culprits are. Of course, she would be banned from JewTube and that would be a big blow but there are other platforms. However, she prefers to stay in the comfortable position of Tommy Robinson, Farage, Matt Godwin, etc. who keep talking about the “Muslim threat” without mentioning the (((real culprits))).
Anyway, things will get much worse and, perhaps, an honest and fearless leader will appear, assuming the Brits will be then ready to do what is necessary…
LikeLike
Claudius:
Thank you.
I stand ready, but I have to concede that the years are against me. I believe that the Poles had a President once who was over 90.
Perhaps some young Alexander will read the blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The British Government refused to build a monument for the hundreds of British men and women murdered by Zionist terrorists in Palestine. They also refused to repatriate their bodies.”
Unsurprising, considering that at the time, Labor and the Tories were led by Clement Attlee and Winston Churchill respectively. Both of whom were full-blown (((REDACTED))) sock puppets.
In the 1930s, the peaceful and mild-mannered George Lansbury was (((removed))) as leader of the Labor Party, and replaced with warmonger Clement Attlee, because Lansbury was opposed to starting a war with Germany.
Attlee, in contrast, openly celebrated in parliament the day after the war started in September 1939, telling the House of Commons that he and the Labor Party were relieved that war had finally been declared.
And of course Churchill was an arch-traitor whose notorious treason and treachery against his own people needs no further elaboration.
So it’s unsurprising that Churchill and Attlee didn’t care about British soldiers being (((murdered))) by zionist terrorists.
After all, these two traitors were willing to start a World War, bankrupt Britain, destroy the British Empire, and send hundreds of thousands of British soldiers to die in the war, all in order to benefit the (((malevolent tribe))) who pulled their strings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This post is a reply/comment to a post by “FRIEND OF BRITAIN” about Alek Yerbury, for some reason I did not have the oprion of “Reply”. Yerbury does not wear a moustache like Hitler´s. The spiteful media keeps harping on that but it is a lie, I saw several photos of Yerbury and he has a normal moustache. He dresses very smartly and speaks quite well. Here is a short speech of him:
LikeLike
Claudius:
Have just watched that. All right, and of course Yerbury is handicapped in what he can say, handicapped by the repressive laws passed at the instigation of “the usual suspects”.
LikeLiked by 1 person