Diary Blog, 29 January 2025

[regret that, once again, tweets are not embedding properly]

Afternoon music

El Gato

https://www.islingtontribune.co.uk/article/farewell-to-el-gato-corbyns-cat-with-a-cult-following

‘The Cat’ sadly passed away this week, and so here is the Islington North MP’s own tribute to his feline companion.

[Islington Tribune]

[El Gato]

Truly, the bond between human and cat passeth all understanding…

The “traveller” menace

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14334773/villagers-accuse-police-abandoning-70-masked-yobs-rip-fields-weekend-terror.html

Traumatised villagers have accused police of abandoning them after scores of suspected travellers drove cars through fields, set fire to vehicles and even attacked two fire engines while hare coursing.

Up to 70 masked people in abour 25 4x4s brought terror to Fenland communities in Cambridgeshire as they took part in the illegal sport.

Locals left cowering in their homes felt powerless as police failed to respond to dozens of 999 calls.

[Daily Mail]

The “traveller” situation is one of the biggest public order challenges in the UK. The police are not only unwilling (at senior, “woke”, level) to deal with it; in some cases they seem to be pandering to these unpleasant criminal nuisances.

Look at that Daily Mail report. The police unwilling or even unable to help the real people of this country. Also, note what the “woke”-contaminated Fire Service says; they call that huge disorder “a minor incident“.

There is a solution to the nuisance but, in our “free” country, I am not allowed to publish it…

Tweets seen

What Goodwin fails to add is that the “one in three” figure does not include those whose parents, though non-European (i.e. non-white), were born here. The real figure for 2050 will therefore be nearer to one in two.

The true situation is and will be far worse even that that.

Anyone, whether Prime Minister, Cabinet minister, MP, newspaper scribbler, TV talking head, or “woke” nobody, who encourages mass migration invasion of these islands must be called traitor.

“Boris” should have been put up against a wall years ago.

Late music

30 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 29 January 2025”

  1. Silly people! If you were moronic enough to vote Labour or fake, loony-liberal, globalist CONServative then you will have voted for ineffectual at dealing with REAL crimes police forces. The PC Stazi/PC Gestapo are far more interested in sitting on their fat asses all day long and staring on computers at people’s Twitter and Facebook accounts for non-PC comments.

    Where do you think this is? A well-run country with a non-PC police force that is actually interested in arresting people for real crimes? You would have to move to Monaco or Japan or South Korea for that, I am afraid.

    An exceptionally effective police force:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monaco_Police_Department

    Like

  2. I am not a fan of cats to any real extent. They normally give me the creeps. I prefer dogs. My favourite breeds are, of course, British Bulldogs, Rottweilers, Newfoundlands, Leonbergers, St Bernards, Akitas, Bernese Mountain Dogs, and Samoyeds.

    Like

  3. Must not just be called the traitors they obviously are but be mercilessly PUNISHED for it to show the immorality of being one and as a warning to others tempted to follow down that anti-British path.

    This can be accomplished by (yes, you guessed it!🤣🤣🤣🤣) an expertly conducted, British-style, long drop hanging or, if I am feeling generous, a 99 year prison sentence as the great state of Texas occasionally gives drug dealers:

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/east-texas-man-99-212140152.html

    Now, I can’t say fairer than that, can I?🤣🤣🤣😀😀😀👍👍👍

    The punishment MUST fit the crime.

    Like

  4. “Traumatised villagers have accused police of abandoning them after scores of suspected travellers drove cars through fields, set fire to vehicles…brought terror to Fenland communities in Cambridgeshire as they took part in the illegal sport….Locals left cowering in their homes felt powerless as police failed to respond to dozens of 999 calls.“”

    Hmmm, I wonder if the self-centered and cowardly military officers and aristocrat types who stayed SILENT on the immigration issue from the 1950s until the present day, are beginning to regret their cowardice?

    Did these complacent self-centered cowards REALLY think that the diversity would always stay in the big cities, and never spread to their leafy villages in the shires?

    I deeply despise the toff types who stayed (and still stay) silent as Britain is invaded by third world diversity.

    If the toffs had actually cared and spoken up, the immigrant invasion could have been stopped in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, when the number of immigrants was still (relatively) small.

    Back then, the British populace was not yet (((brainwashed))) with guilt propaganda, and if the British upper class had demanded a halt to immigration, it would have happened.

    But unfortunately, the toffs were (and still are) too cowardly, self-centered, and complacent to care about the survival of their race, so they said “F*** you!” to the White urban working class, and retreated to their leafy villages in Dorset and Shropshire.

    Truly a disgraceful abdication of their patriotic duty. The military officer types, the aristocrats, and the other toffs are so terrified of being called “racist” that they are willing to sit and watch and do nothing while their children’s future is destroyed. Utterly disgraceful and cowardly!

    Which brings me to the topic of Traitor Charlie, or His Majesty King Charles III, as he prefers to be called.

    It’s interesting how Charles could find time to go to Auschwitz and cry, but couldn’t bother to find any time (or shed any tears) for the million little White British girls who have been raped by muslims and africans.

    Charles cares about foreign (((REDACTEDS))), but he doesn’t seem to care about his own subjects who are being raped and murdered by diversity.

    Charles might call himself “king”, but he is no more than an obedient (((REDACTED))) sock puppet.

    How contemptible. One wonders if he is privately ashamed at what he has been reduced to: a groveling pawn of the (((REDACTEDS))).

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Friend of Britain:
      I agree with much of that, but the so-called “travellers”, often referred to but not entirely accurately (and mostly not so ethnically) as “gypsies” or (more accurately) “Irish tinkers”, are often descendants of the “navvies” (“navigators”) imported from Ireland in the late 18thC and early/mid 19thC to dig the canals which were such an important part of the Industrial Revolution.

      Like

      1. As Head of State, the Monarch is basically told where to go by the Foreign Office/government. Bought and paid for Zionist loony tunes Starmer might well be tempted to tell Charles to visit the continual international law defying, expansionist, terroristic Zionist entity but I would hope Charles who can be strongminded and willfull will tell Starmer/the Foreign Office to eff off in no uncertain terms.

        Going there would be controversial to say the least and would reflect badly upon the Monarchy.

        Like

    2. He does not really care about Zionist Jew fanatics. In private, the Royals are said to be pretty ‘anti-semitic’ (whatever the term means nowadays since Zionist Jew zealots have stretched the definition to utterly absurd and effectively meaningless lengths).

      The late Queen visited virtually every country on earth yet never visited the Zionist terroristic entity. I doubt King Charles will either and I would hope not not only because of the Palestinian situation but also because Israel still has not aplogised to us over the truely vicious terrorism Zionist terrorists used against us during the state’s establishment.

      The only Jews King Charles III does not have a problem with are the Ultra-Orthadox ‘black hat brigade’ ones who are normally not pro-Israel nutters, do not normally involve themselves in politics, are pretty insular and do not normally cause trouble for gentiles.

      Like

  5. I see that Rachel from Accounts has spouted some utter nonsense today about airport expansion supposedly being able to kick-start some economic growth. This is rubbish and has been proven to be by even leftwing economics thinktanks such as the New Economics Foundation.

    Neither will destroying the Green Belt do this. It is time for unelected Rachel and her posse to go back to school. At any rate, I do not accept the ‘democratic’ legitimacy of Rachel and company to misrule me as a single-party government seeing as 66% of people on a low turnout of just 60% DID NOT vote for this rabble of anti-British, globalist, unthinking, mathematically challenged, environment vandalising morons.

    https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk

    https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk

    https://www.cpre.org.uk

    Airport expansion and destroying the much needed Green Belt will not deliver economic growth but it WILL ruin the environment which is an important part of Britain’s cultural heritage and make their supposed aim of reducing carbon emissions utterly impossible to achieve.

    ‘Joined-up government’ this is emphatically NOT.

    Like

  6. Nick Reeves9876 on Twitter/X is still ranting about Elon Musk. Does this raving globalist liberal-left person from (where else?) Brighton (‘Britain’s San Francisco’) think the multi multi-billionaire Elon Musk seriously gives a damm what these kind of people say about him? Elon is so utterly obscenely wealthy he could buy entire countries!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_of_Elon_Musk

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk

    What are liberal-left globalists on Twitter/X going to do when Elon becomes the world’s first TRILLIONAIRE as he is predicted to be in a few years time?

    https://twitter.com/nickreeves9876

    He still hasn’t left Musk’s site yet though!🙄🙄🙄🙄

    Like

  7. Another proof of Corbyn´s lack of intelligence and imagination; el called his cat “El Gato”, that is Spanish for “The Cat”. How stupid can you be? 😆​😆​😆 Is like calling your son “El Niño” = “The Boy”.

    Like

      1. Yes, that is probably the case. At least it shows Corbyn has a character and is human. Starmer would not give a cat of his an affectionate name as he appears to have had a personality bypass at birth and is devoid of empathy and feeling for other humans unless, of course, they are vicious Zionist thugs in Israel who persecute and oppress Palestinians. He certainly has none for working-class Britons.

        Like

      2. Starmer is evil. If you support Israel 100% as he does after what we have witnessed over the last year then you must be either a Jewish Zionist fanatic or a Gentile ‘human’ totally devoid of empathy for others. Of course, in his case, he has also been effectively bought by the Zionist Pro Israel lobby so there is that monetary factor at work.

        The Zionist state has surely taken the notion of ‘self-defence’ to absurd parody levels. 150,000 dead or injured/maimed Palestinians in revenge for 1,000 odd Israelis is overblown as ‘self-defence’ goes.

        Israel as a sovereign state has a right to self-defence but they never exercise that right in a proportionate manner.

        The best solution would be a one state one whereby Jews and Palestinians could live in peace and harmony together as they used to do during the times of the British mandate before the Zionist supremacist and expanionist philosophy took hold. Jews would be equal citizens of the Palestinian state. As the Israeli state would be replaced by a Palestinian state they would lose Israeli citizenship and not be known as Israeli Jews but they would still be Jews and able to practice their religion and culture freely.

        Like

      3. John:
        As said previously, you are even more of an idealist than me, if you believe that Jews can live such in a state as suggested, yet not try to control it.

        Like

    1. Of course it goes without saying I do not support Corbyn’s ultra-globalist opinions on immigration but I imagine you could sit down with him and try and have a half-decent political conversation with him. That would be impossible with Starmer because, frankly, he is an arrogant, middle-class tosser though not quite as obviously as the satanic Tony Bliar is.

      Like

      1. John:
        Starmer is the kind of lukewarm mealy-mouth who would consign millions to poverty and hopelessness while parroting a few rote-learned statements of a stale and politically-correct sort (“inclusion”, “public safety”, “multicultural society”, “lessons of ‘holocaust'” etc). In fact, that is what the bastard *is* doing…

        Like

  8. I just found that one of the largest and most beautiful mansions in London was sold for £ 139.000.000; yes, you read well. It was “The Holme”, designed and built by the great neoclassical architect Decimus Burton.

    The article below gives you an idea of how corrupt this world has become; do not tell me that these bloody billionaires have to present scores of documents to prove that they are not laundering money! If I receive a transfer for more of U$S 1.000 I have to prove that is not the result of some illicit activity! 🤬​🤬​🤬

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holme

    Like

  9. Interesting… “Over half of Gen Z want UK to be a dictatorship, study suggests”

    The vile and despicable British “democracy” represented by Starmer & Co. is becaming more hated as the days are passing by. The same thing happened with the disgusting and ultra decadent Republic of Weimar in the late 1920s.

    As I said it many times, we will NEVER get out of this mess by voting like obedient sheep. This is the beginning; people, particulalrly the younger, will get more frustrated and enraged. Let´s hope that a great leader, a better version of Sir Oswald Mosley, will arrive at the right time.

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/study-gen-z-dictatorship-channel-four-b1207319.html

    Like

    1. Claudius:
      What we have at present in the UK is a fake pseudo-“elected” dictatorship anyway.

      I think you have to go back to fundamentals. If the Government, if the State, if society itself is not providing the basics of a decent life for people, *especially* young people, then they *will* turn to radical movements and/or parties offering a way forward.

      Whatever a System party such as Labour offers, or even attempts to achieve, e.g. building more houses to “solve” the UK’s housing crisis, will be rendered utterly pointless and unsuccessful by the scale of the continuing migration invasion. People are now, finally, at least starting to wake up to that. It will have political consequences. First Reform UK, but later more radical policies and movements.

      In a word, “we’re back!”…

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yes, a fake ‘democracy’ indeed and it always has been. What sort of real democracy allows its populace a vote but due to stand alone, ‘pure’ First Past The Post most people live in ‘safe’ seats which never change hands even in landslide conditions eg the seat of Windsor has been Tory-held since Queen Victoria was on the throne.

        There is no point in a voter having a vote if it is NOT EQUAL to another voter. Having an electoral system made-up EXCLUSIVELY of single-member (one MP per seat) geographical constituencies means that the weight of an individual’s vote is treated differrently within the overall system because of where that person lives.

        That is a HUGE flaw of the present system and it MUST be rectified.

        https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk

        https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk

        Like

      2. Even the very name of one part of our supposedly national parliament indicates the general truth. Most countries call their lower house the national assembly or the house of REPRESENTATIVES. What do we call ours? Yes, that is right, we call it the House of COMMONS! What? Are we mere common plebs not meant to be involved in running our country and should just do the decent thing and leave governance to our ‘betters’ ie the Monarchy and/or the aristocracy instead? There is a very ‘top down’ view of ‘democracy’ in this country instead of a ‘from the bottom upwards’ one.

        Like

      3. As you say, it doesn’t matter how many houses Labour builds if the demand for housing keeps on expanding through no control over immigration. Labour obviously doesn’t understand the pretty basic, G.C.S.E level Economics concept of supply and demand. Mind you, the thick Tories do not either and they are supposed to be the prime exponents of neo-liberal economics yet seemingly can’t understand this prime factor underpinning a market economy.

        Labour supposedly wants to cut our carbon emissions but it doesn’t exercise any control over immigration. More people equals a higher carbon footprint through more of a need for energy ect. It really is not rocket science.

        Like

      4. Not really since they have opted out of voting. This is understandable though according to your viewpoint. Infact, our now low turnout at general elections is one good reason to change to a decent version of Proportional Representation. Denmark using the very good Scandinavian version of party list PR with ‘levelling’ seats regularly has turnouts in the 80% plus and sometimes even 85% and over range.

        With PR, we should aim to increase our turnout to 75% to 85%.

        Like

      5. Yes, Claudius’s country of Argentina is far more democratic than Britain is. We are one of the LEAST democratic countries in Europe and the world. In Europe, we share ‘pure’ First Past The Post with Belarus (Putin’s only real friend in Europe) and Iceland for their Presidential elections (of course, for a multiple winner situation ie their parliament they use party list Proportional Representation)

        This country’s political system is so out of date and dsyfunctional it is no wonder our EU membership was pretty much a failure from day one in January 1973.

        Like

  10. People like the globalist, pro-EU fanatic, Michael Heseltine, wonder why we voted out of the EU. Well, of course, there were many reasons for people doing that but one factor might well have been utter political disenchantment which has been building for many years thanks to Labour AND his party and pure FPTP is a system that positively BREEDS it.

    If his party or Labour had changed it to PR earlier and introduced this country to the idea of collaboration in politics which Proportional Representation/fair votes promotes the vote may well have been for Remain. After all, the EU is built-upon collaboration so if a country has PR it is used to it within parliament and council chambers but we were not used to it hence the idea behind the EU is pretty alien for us.

    If he wants us to rejoin, we will need to have a truly democratic parliament elected by PR first. I suspect that would be at least one of the conditions for future British EU membership they would demand.

    Like

    1. There was, I believe, a lot of the ‘up yours to the political Establishment’ factor at work during that now infamous referendum which helped to tip the balance towards the leave position. Frankly, that should come as no surprise. ‘Pure’ FPTP removes political agency from a lot of voters due to literally MILLIONS of votes being ‘wasted’ (in the sense of those votes not contributing at all to the election of MPs) at EVERY general ‘election’.

      In July last year, this reached the staggering total of 58% of all votes being ‘wasted’ in this way. Even with more proportional results in the past it has never been less than 40%.

      In contrast, in Germany in 2013, the ‘wasted’ vote percentage was about 16% which was mainly caused by the AfD and the liberal Free Democrats polling percentages just below the 5% national threshold to earn Proportional Representation. This was their most disproportionate result of recent times. The ‘wasted’ vote percentage is usually lower.

      Like

      1. John:
        The proportion of “wasted” votes has to include all the votes not cast at all, mainly because many voters cannot find a party which they can both support and has a realistic chance.

        Like

    2. Heseltine and other rejoiners will have to do this quickly if we are to rejoin because there might not be much of an EU left to join again. The CDU leader in Germany, Friedrich Merz, who is expected to be the next Chancellor, wants to immediately reject ‘asylum seekers’ at the border and also wishes to close them. Needless to say, that will destroy the Schengen agrement of open borders beween most EU members. Austria has condemmed this and even Greece has though it is a long way away geographically from Germany. Germany can’t expect others to keep to EU rules if they just conveniently dump them at will. This idea of unilaterally dumping the Schengen arrangements overnight could increase EU withdrawal feelings in Italy ect. Merkel could be said to have tipped our EU vote to leave through allowing a million plus migrants to enter Germany in 2015 where they could gain EU citizenship and share it with us. Merkel did not consult with other EU members before she did this.

      Like

Leave a reply to John Cancel reply