Morning music
Talking point
An opinion poll that should be perused closely by, inter alia, the police (including Hampshire Police, Gloucestershire Police, and Essex Police), and the “Clown” Prosecution Service, among other bodies.
I republish some of my own relevant experiences below:
Talking point
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-14385273/genz-dictator-democracy-starmer-trump.html
“Britain’s in decline. Democracy has lost its way. Yes, many would squeal – but it’s no wonder so many of my generation believe it’s time for a dictator: CHARLIE DOWNES offers a provocative view.
Young people in the UK – born, like me, in the 21st century – are constantly told how lucky we are to have ‘freedom’.
To our parents and grandparents, steeped in the baggage of the Second World War, ‘freedom’ is the ultimate democratic right.
But many in Generation Z can see that our ‘free’ society has degenerated into instability and uncertainty.
If ‘freedom’ means being unable to afford a home, to live in overcrowded and overpriced rented accommodation, to work soulless jobs in order to pay sky-high taxes, and to have no sense of belonging or identity, perhaps freedom is not what we need.
So it’s no shock to read that a recent survey commissioned by Channel 4 found that 52 per cent of Britons aged 13 to 27 have lost faith in democracy and would welcome a dictator – a strong leader ‘who does not have to bother with parliament and elections’.
A third of my generation believe ‘the UK would be a better place if the Army was in charge’.
Other polls have found that many of us are likely to back the death penalty, while a Mail on Sunday survey this week found that two-thirds of us favour castrating sex offenders.
These reports have caused much alarm among liberal commentators – for whom democracy and the social contract are sacrosanct.
They don’t want to face the brutal truth that the social contract has been ripped up by a political class that has long refused to put the interests of ordinary British people first, or to deliver on our repeatedly expressed wishes at the ballot box – on immigration, crime, tax and much else.
Drug use, shoplifting and defrauding the state go unpunished. Millions of economically burdensome migrants from places and cultures vastly different from our own are invited in, housed and fed at our expense – and we are attacked and slurred as bigots if we complain.
As for democracy, it’s obvious from the visible decline in our country – which worsened after the 2008 financial crash and which has accelerated under Keir Starmer – that it isn’t delivering the right results.
Our supposed parliamentary rule is either an illusion, an anachronism or, if it does exist, clearly not fit for purpose.
After Labour’s landslide win last summer, it rapidly dawned on many of us who had voted for the first time that we were essentially politically impotent.
Britain is crying out for leadership that can steer the country to safety.
Gen Z’s demands are not unreasonable: fairer taxes, affordable homes, cheaper energy and an end to unlimited immigration.
We ask that everyone contributes their fair share and that crime is properly punished.
We want to trust our neighbours, and talk to them in our own language. We want a sense of identity and belonging.
Which is why, I believe, we now need decisive action: a leader who would declare a state of emergency in response to illegal migration.
Without a strong leader who can reverse deindustrialisation, neoliberal economic policy and mass immigration, our country seems condemned to a future of being riddled with crime, political strife and social unrest.
Yet perhaps, out of this ongoing catastrophe, renewal will come.
History, after all, has a way of throwing up great men or women when the hour calls for them.
…young people in particular recognise that political leaders of all parties have made an abysmal mess of running things. No wonder so many believe it’s time for a radical alternative.
It sounds drastic – because it is drastic.
But otherwise we all face the continued rule of grey, miserable politicians with grey, miserable ideas, dragging us towards disaster.
And Gen Z will not tolerate that much longer.“
[Charlie Downes, writing in the Daily Mail]
The author seems to be about 24, and possibly a member or supporter of Reform UK: https://www.linkedin.com/in/cfdownes.
Where to start? Firstly, “freedom” and “democracy” are not the same concept or even similar concepts. The linkage, though it exists, is loose.
I examined the idea of democracy some years ago on the blog:
Of course, if people lack shelter, clothing, warmth, food, other needs and/or wants, then “freedom”, let alone the existing form of supposed “democracy”, will not seem of the most pressing importance.
One has to wonder why the Daily Mail is allowing such views, those of this Charlie Downes, to be blasted so explosively on its pages. It seems to me that the main reason is that the Conservative Party is as good as dead among the vast majority of the electorate, and the Labour Party is in a similar condition except that it is still psychologically embedded in the mentality of the voters of much of the North of England and, also, most of the blacks and browns vote Labour en masse, and they are now 20% of the whole electorate, much more in the great cities.
Labour support among white people (the people formerly known as British) is no more than about 10% (at most), in reality. Maybe only 5%.
The Daily Mail’s owners, and others, now look for a party neither socialist nor national socialist/social nationalist but which may capture mass support. Reform UK.
A quasi-dictatorial period may be necessary in the UK, but only if the policies are those I have promulgated on the blog over the past 8 years. Basically social national policies. Anything else is useless and wrongheaded.
Tweets seen
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14386715/Labours-new-borders-watchdog-WFH-Finland.html
This country is just mad now. Also, can you imagine how much this Tuckett person must get, not only in salary but also in generous expenses if he can travel weekly, or more often, from his home in Finland to London? All that might even be acceptable…were he and his office(s) of any use whatsoever.
“Before us, I see two possible futures: One where the United Kingdom is remembered as a cautionary tale — the lone state that took the doctrine of modern liberalism (mass immigration, social egalitarianism, net zero) to its logical conclusion, and descended into poverty, social unrest, ethnoreligious balkanisation, and civil war. Britain gave birth to liberalism, after all, so in a way this would be quite a fitting end. The other is one in which a new, daring elite forgoes all niceties and brings order to the British Isles. Perhaps we are seen as a pariah state for a while, having gone to war with modern liberalism — but when all is said and done, our nation is secure. I know which one I prefer.”
“The Conservative Party remains in complete denial. It thinks Reform will soon disappear and voters will forget the Tory years of broken promises and national decline. When will the once great party of Churchill and Thatcher wake up and draft a plan to put its house in order? The country still hasn’t been given even the beginnings of an explanation for why the party failed so comprehensively in the painful years of May, Boris, Truss and Sunak. Losing 251 MPs didn’t do the trick. Reform overtaking the Conservative Party in membership and opinion poll strength hasn’t shaken Badenoch or her throwback shadow cabinet. Even an exodus of donors has provoked little signs of life or resolve. The top tier of the party still thinks they’re the natural party of govt and that Labour unpopularity will eventually restore sense to the vast bulk of former Tory voters. Most Tory commentators are going along with this complacency. The lack of urgency and the modesty of Badenoch’s first 100 days really shocks me. I am beginning to contemplate that the party’s decline might be terminal.“
[Tim Montgomerie]
Still clapping? The NHS is now, at best, a skeleton service and with spending cuts and migration-invasion set to continue, will become ever more so.
Ian Robert Millard 
The problem with our police is . . . they are nowhere to be found.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The problem with our police is . . . they are nowhere to be found.”
Starmer’s wannabe NKVD are too busy arresting British patriots for making “anti-semitic” and “racist” comments on the internet, because Pro-White activism is a threat to the (((ruling elite))), while violent crime against White people is actually encouraged and incited by the (((ruling elite))).
LikeLike
“being unable to afford a home, to live in overcrowded and overpriced rented accommodation, to work soulless jobs in order to pay sky-high taxes, and to have no sense of belonging or identity, perhaps freedom is not what we need.”
This is what “winning” World War 2 looks like.
Brave British patriots such as Sir Oswald Mosley, Sir Barry Domvile, Captain Archibald Maule-Ramsay, Captain Arnold Leese, the 12th Duke of Bedford, A.K. Chesterton, Henry Hamilton Beamish, the 9th Earl of Portsmouth, and MANY other great patriots WARNED the British people that the (((REDACTEDS))) were manipulating and goading Britain into a war which would destroy Western civilization.
Unfortunately the British public ignored these warnings.
Although it is noteworthy that no election was held between 1935 and 1945, presumably because the traitorous politicians were afraid that the British public would vote against the war.
Instead, Churchill ruled as an unelected dictator, just like (((Zelensky))) in Ukraine. The similarities between Churchill and (((Zelensky))) are uncanny, with the main difference being that (((Zelensky))) was a somewhat successful comedian/clown, whereas Churchill was just a degenerate slob who “failed upward” due to his career being advanced by his (((REDACTED))) puppeteers.
Due to the treason of Churchill, Attlee, Archibald Sinclair, the repulsive toad Duff Cooper, and the other corrupt establishment politicians, the (((REDACTEDS))) were able to gain control of Britain and systematically destroy the country and genocide the British race.
That is how the disgusting evil (((REDACTEDS))) show their “gratitude” to the country that fought for them in World War 2.
Millions of White British men charged into machine gun fire to fight for the (((REDACTEDS))), and the (((REDACTEDS))) show their “gratitude” by importing violent savages to rape the granddaughters of those White British soldiers, while simultaneously brainwashing those soldiers’ descendants into feeling guilty for existing.
That is how the (((REDACTEDS))) show their “gratitude” to the country and people who fought for (((them))).
This treachery by the (((REDACTEDS))) should NEVER be forgotten, nor forgiven.
“One has to wonder why the Daily Mail is allowing such views, those of this Charlie Downes, to be blasted so explosively on its pages.”
The (((Daily Mail))) specializes in pretending to be patriotic and pretending to care about the concerns of Middle England.
And then, once the (((Mail’s))) readers are convinced that they can trust the (((Mail))), the (((Mail))) pulls a sleight-of-hand trick, and gaslights its readers AWAY from Pro-White movements that will actually solve Britain’s problems and save the British race.
That is the role of the (((Daily Mail))): a safety valve that gains the trust of disaffected British patriots, and then gaslights the patriots into supporting pointless, useless movements such as the Tories, Reform, etc, to divert the patriots AWAY from White nationalism.
That is why you see content such as Downes’ article in the (((Mail))), and then the very next day you see another article hysterically denouncing Patriotic Alternative as “SICK NAZIS” or whatever dramatic frenzied smears the (((Mail))) can come up with.
The (((Mail))) specializes in manipulatively gaining the trust of patriotic readers, and then gaslights and diverts those patriots AWAY from Pro-White organizations.
In a way, the (((Daily Mail))) is even more dangerous than openly liberal publications such as the (((Guardian))). At least the (((Guardian))) is openly liberal and stabs you in the front.
The (((Daily Mail))) pretends to be your friend, and then stabs you in the back.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
Quite right. The Mail is —and supports— “controlled opposition”, of which Reform is so obviously an example. However, this is a “Father Gapon” situation, and the puppet may take on a life of its own in the end. As recently as last week, the narrative was “the old parties have failed—vote Reform at the next semi-rigged election and everything will be different.” Now, this week an open demand for one-man dictatorship…
LikeLike
Lammy is the kind of person who makes you laugh not because he is witty but because he is SO dumb.
Sometimes I think that the famous English expression “Thick as two planks” was inspired by him…
LikeLike