Diary Blog, 10 June 2025

Afternoon music

Tweets seen

Perhaps an “Eichmann”-style abduction of the pair to the UK, followed by condign punishment (after a fair trial, of course…).

This has been coming down the tracks for a long time:

The fact is that most of London is now just a dustbin for untermenschen.

…and the other half of the country are either not really British anyway, or are socio-political idiots.

Wall. Squad. End.

That still leaves those not here “illegally”, and those born to non-Europeans in the UK over the past 80 years. Millions. Tens of millions.

As I began to understand about three years ago— it surprised me— Starmer is totally clueless. He has no idea about anything, beyond a robotic knowledge of the criminal law, and I am now not so sure even about that.

Hard to know who is the most hopeless, Starmer, or “Rachel from Accounts and Customer Relations” Reeves, or the others such as thick-as-two-short planks Angela Rayner, Liz Kendall etc.

The System parties and msm are gleefully finding fault with Reform UK in order to try to get voters to turn back to Lab or Con or both, but what they still fail to understand is that many many people have, in their minds, now chucked Lab and Con in the bin. If Reform were to dwindle, another (and perhaps better, truly social-national) party will emerge, like a force of nature.

Very good. Glad to see that, though I remain angry that some evil people still use such animals for cruel, brainless, tick-box “experimentation”.

Well, I think that the pribaltika turned against Russia a long time ago, in the times of Lenin, Stalin, and their successors, and with good reason.

Having said that, the political leadership in all three Baltic states has now gone beyond reasonable and proper self-determination (which latter I support, as I do their cultural freedom), and has become part of the NWO/ZOG gameplan.

100,000 deserters, and millions trying to avoid being recruited at all.

Translates into a Reform majority government with 341 MPs, Lab 154, LibDem 66, SNP 36, Cons 23…

Late music

[David D. Pearce, Bird Souk, Cairo. Pearce was a U.S. Foreign Service officer, latterly at ambassadorial level: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_D._Pearce]

3 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 10 June 2025”

  1. It’s very nice to see those adorable dogs tasting freedom and grass. Unfortunately, I believe there are hundreds of places that torture animals under the name of “testing”.

    Yesterday, I watched a video where a person said that the three Ukrainian “models” arrested in connection with the arson attacks against Starmer´s house and car will be appearing in court in April 2026! Why? How is it possible that a person charged with a crime has to wait almost a year for their case to be heard? Is it because there are too many cases and the system cannot cope with them?

    I think it could be a combination of both factors. By the way, I got this information from a British solicitor´s website:

    According to government statistics, it took an average of 357 days for a case to get all the way to the Crown Court, and an average of 178 days in court to get to an outcome. The data can be further broken down by charging stage:

    • Time between the offence being committed and being charged: 323 days
    • Time between being charged and the first hearing: 34 days
    • Time between the first hearing and completion at the magistrates’: 9 days
    • Time between the sending of the case to Crown Court to the start of trial: 119 days
    • Time between the start of the trial and the completion of the trial: 50 days

    Like

    1. Claudius:
      A combination of factors (but including the “Covid” panic-stricken nonsense, and also cuts to legal aid, leading in turn to a shortage of willing defence counsel) has led to this situation, which affects all courts but especially the Crown Courts which, as you know, try the more serious criminal cases.

      I read somewhere recently that some Crown Courts are now already setting matters down for trial in 2029! There is a continuing backlog of cases now.

      Criminal defendants are more likely to be helped than hindered by such delay, because witnesses die, or forget, or move overseas, during the gap of up to 4 years. Also, some judges are likely to give less severe sentences to defendants found guilty after long delays, so long as the delays were not their fault. Of course, if a crime has been committed in, say, 2020, it is not unlikely that an arrest will not happen for years, and that there may be a delay of up to 5 years in bringing it to trial, so between the commission of the crime, and trial and/or sentence, there might be a period of anything up to 10 years.

      Like

  2. The subhumans in Los Angeles are showing their true colours. The repulsive bias of the liberal bastards running the media and the TV crews covering “the peaceful protests” is colossal. I wonder what would happen if the person in charge of restoring order in LA were someone like Stalin…

    Like

Leave a comment