Diary Blog, 16 May 2023

Afternoon music

[painting by Volegov]

Tweets seen

“Bob from Brockley”, meaning Jew-Zionist fanatic Ben Gidley, a lecturer at Birkbeck College, London. He used to troll me relentlessly (for about 7 years) on Twitter when I had a Twitter account; a pack of Jews (may or may not have included Gidley) had me expelled in 2018).

I worked out his identity not long before other, unconnected, people did, including the well-known journalist, Peter Hitchens (another “victim” of Gidley’s online trolling). Hitchens has mentioned Gidley several times in his Mail on Sunday column. Gidley has not had the gall to threaten Hitchens (or me) with any action in defamation…

Gidley has and has had a number of other Twitter accounts, some now eliminated or frozen by Twitter: “AntiNazisUnited” was one, “InTheSoupAgain” was another.

Like so many fanatical Jew-Zionists on Twitter, Gidley seems to spend much of his time “reporting” or denouncing non-Jews (almost exclusively) to anyone who might listen. Others (I do not know about Gidley) are not content with complaining pointlessly to Twitter, so also “report” to police, professional regulators, employers etc.

What often strikes me, looking at many of these types, is how limited their world is. Many of them tweet almost exclusively about supposed “antisemitism”. Few have anything to say about anything else (except how good, they think, Israel is). Very few have anything to say about ideas for the betterment of society. It’s all “antisemitism”, “Israel”, and “Nazis”. 78 years after the end of the Second World War. All seem to hate freedom of expression (for non-Jews).

I suspect (not sure) that one of Gidley’s more recent Twitter accounts is “@Lapsedmethodist”, which purports to be an Ireland-based Twitter account mostly interested in Israel/Palestine.

I had actually forgotten about Gidley’s existence until I saw the above exchange on Twitter, but there it is, still whining about “antisemitism”, and still opposing any justice for the Palestinian Arabs displaced (killed or “ethnically cleansed”) by Jews.

Stray thought

I just happened to see a tweet (leading to a website page) by the Crown Prosecution Service. All about an event at the building now housing the Supreme Court, in Parliament Square, London. The CPS official commenting, a Sikh, stated that “Diversity was fully embraced at this event“. Well, I looked at the several photographs of groups of people attending. Out of a couple of dozen attendees, there seemed to be only one white/English person. There’s “diversity” for you— the British/English relegated to mere “me too” add-ons.

That is our future unless we do something about it. I refer to the future of the people as a whole, not to myself personally. I am already 66, and I fear for the future of the British/English people as a whole, and for our society.

[Germany 1945— “We are fighting for the future of our children!”]

Incidentally, I know that Supreme Court building. When I was a youngish barrister in London, 30 years ago, that building was still designated as Middlesex Guildhall Crown Court (despite being in Parliament Square). At that time, there was no “Supreme Court” in the UK, and the highest court was still called the “House of Lords” (Judicial Committee).

I did my first actual Crown Court trial in that building, a “section 18” GBH with intent, and secured an acquittal, despite the defendant having poured boiling oil over his assailant and then stabbed him twice (you would need to know all the details to understand why the jury came to that —just— verdict). Happy times…

More tweets seen

That stupid old woman thinks that she is terribly clever (her time in Government suggested the opposite: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Widdecombe).

Ann Widdecombe is in fact the sort of completely out of touch individual who should never be near political power or significant office. Look at her background.

She was a student until age 25-26, after which she had her only two ordinary jobs, both low-level “gopher” ones. Unilever got rid of her (I think that she was a clerk) after less than 2 years, then she ploughed on as an “administrator”, i.e. clerk, in an office of London University for 12 years.

Imagine Ann Widdecombe’s lack of (?) ambition/talent/knowledge/usefulness until she somehow got selected to be Conservative Party MP for Maidstone (a “safe seat”) in 1987.

Anne Widdecombe has never married, never had children, and seems to have lived with her parents until quite an advanced age (seems to have been in her thirties).

Not that I disagree with all of her views. I am broadly with her on animal rights, or animal welfare (pro), on abortion (anti), and on some other issues. It is just that people like her, who have never “walked in the moccasins” of others, cannot judge social issues fairly. As the film clip above shows.

The UK Parliament is packed with people who should not be there, and that has been the case for a long time, certainly since the 1980s.

Imagine…Ann Widdecombe talking about a cheese sandwich as though it is some kind of luxury item!

I might add that if governments keep failing to deliver to the people not even what they want, but what they need, MPs and others may be shocked one fine day to see what happens, including what happens to them. Be warned.

Again, Ann Widdecombe shows her complete separation from reality.

On Twitter today, the above socio-political discussion has caused a storm, but this goes beyond Ann Widdecombe (who ceased to be an MP many years ago). It is about all the other deluded people (of various types) in Parliament and also in the msm.

Look at the fantasy politics we have endured for well over a decade— “austerity” fantasy, whereby everything was cut back because of the nonsense idea that those on unemployment and disability benefits somehow caused the financial crash of 2007-2008; the “Covid” “panicdemic” or “scamdemic”, with its ludicrous “laws” and “rules” (the “social distancing”, the facemask nonsense, the quarantine nonsense, the “lockdown” nonsense etc, and of course the “test and trace” fiasco and fake “vaccines”)…

Now we have “Ukraine” (Kiev regime) policy, the idea that the UK must funnel unlimited money, arms, ammunition, medical supplies etc to Kiev, despite Ukraine having only been a state (a failed state) for 30 years or so, despite the UK having no historical tie with Ukraine, despite the UK having no treaty with Ukraine.

Oh, and of course any Ukrainian “refugees” (many are in fact not even Ukrainian in the first place— there are blacks and browns too) who land here (many of them being in fact relatively affluent) can get, immediately, all UK social security and medical benefits. Most are fake “refugees” too (having come from Kiev or the peaceful areas in the west of Ukraine), and quite a few actually despise us and our country, yet “our” Government throws money at them, while denying British children a cheese sandwich…

More tweets

Looks like someone needs to be shown the error of her ways…

Judging by the accent of the shouting idiot, in Canada.

I read that the Kiev-regime air defence forces fired off about 40 Patriot missiles in a matter of minutes last night. USD $4M each. USD $160M gone, literally in a flash. Zelensky must be thanking whatever god he may have for the US and UK (etc) taxpayers, who are funding this war. Meanwhile, in the UK, poor children cannot have even a cheese sandwich because (according to idiots like Ann Widdecombe) “there is no money“…

Late tweets seen

…and so, slowly, gradually, the states of Western Europe become more enmeshed in the Ukraine conflict. The situation needs only one or two events, perhaps not even thought-out events, and the Third World War will be triggered. Maybe not this month, maybe not this year, but sometime fairly soon. It is not inevitable, and can be prevented, but at present no-one, certainly no-one in the centres of power in the West, is even trying.

Seems that Ukrainians are lining up to join up. Oh, no, wait…

Late music


17 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 16 May 2023”

  1. A commentary on the judge who presided over the Sven Longshanks case, the harsh sentence he handed down and other cases where he was much more lenient.

    “This Judge is a DISGRACE to the UK’s Legal System”!

    [YouTube video redacted for legal reasons]


    1. Sadly, we can’t see it. I can image though that this judge is all too familiar ie that he is of the senile, old, formerly public school attending type who lives somewhere still nice and mostly law abiding like Tory-inclined Royal Tumbridge Wells and thinks politically incorrect opinions should be repressed severely and those who express them deprived of their liberty yet REAL criminals like muggers, rapists, drug dealers ext should be given pathetically lenient sentences.

      This country could do with a purge of left wing people in the judiciary. They are a real MENANCE to our society.

      I am normally passionately opposed to mass immigration but I wonder if sacking British police officers en masse and replacing them with Japanese, South Korean or Singaporean policemen and women and liberal, PC judges with those from Japan, South Korea, Singapore or Monaco wouldn’t do this country a power of good.


  2. Ann Widdecombe has some sensible opinions on many issues ie she is opposed to the often needless and LEGAL form of MURDER of INNOCENT babies in the womb called abortion the sick left is so much in favour of and she wants GUILTY people who have ILLEGALLY taken an INNOCENT person’s life ie murderers to be put to death via an execution using the hangman’s noose.

    Unlike the sick Left she gets the distinction between abortion and the death penalty and doesn’t view all human life on the same moral level.

    It is a shame she appears to have the same kind of mindless, immoral, anti poor bigotry Ian Dumbo Smith has.

    As she has been involved in politics a long time, she must know in her heart the Reform Party is very unlikely to get anywhere.

    What Britain needs is a national-conservative/nationalist party like Germany’s Afd or France’s National Rally rather than yet more iterations of the Brexit Party.


  3. Ukrainian refugees do have more of a genuine case to be here than the usually entirely fake Third World economic migrants Labour and fake Conservative alike keep-on importing via the ‘refugee’ route which, to be frank, the British government has been ABUSING for decades as a form of migration by the back door.

    That being said, when and if, Ukraine becomes a safe country again, Ukrainian refugees MUST go home. Asylum is SUPPOSED to be TEMPORARY admission to a country from genuine danger not yet another means of immigration.


  4. I would rather have Ann Widdecombe as Home Secretary than the PROVEN utter failure that was Priti Patel or Suella Braverman who, so far, has accomplished NOTHING in the way of REAL immigration control or the much needed reform of our PC obsessed and disgracefully ineffectual leftwing police ‘forces’.

    Suella TALKS a good game sometimes but where is the beef/actual delivery?


    1. John:
      Suella Braverman, Priti Patel…for me, rather similar in various ways, not least in that they both —as you say— talk big but deliver nothing or almost nothing.


  5. One thing you can say about Ann Widdecombe with respect to her opinions on that show was that she was at least HONEST in expressing them. Does anyone seriously think someone like ‘ Refugees Welcome’ Yvette Cooper doesn’t also think like that?However, as she is a member of globalist, anti-British New Labour Mark 2 she is careful enough to not say the same sentiments in public as if she did her party would be viewed as anti-poor.

    Keir Starmer’s warmed-up 1990’s New Labour Tribute Act won’t do anything for the BRITISH poor either.


  6. Infact, apart from profoundly silly and unwise policies such as giving EU citizens the right to vote in our elections despite us leaving the pan-European organisation (well, at least, GB has left whilst NI is still firmly wedged into it) and giving this right to 16 year olds as well does anyone have the faintest real idea as to what New Labour Mark 2 plans to do in office?

    There is a vast, gaping, chasm where the official Opposition should be.


    1. John:
      Starmer cannot be trusted in respect of anything he says (except perhaps his support for the Jewish/Zionist lobby). He is an outright careerist in the “New Labour” mould.


      1. Yes, he is a distinctly untrustworthy character who has broken every promise he made to his party to gain the leadership of it. If he treats them with such stunning contempt it is a surefire bet ordinary British voters will come off even worse.

        As you say, the security of Israel and protecting fanatical, pro Israel, Jewish Zionists from the often well justified criticism of them is one thing he CAN be relied upon to be sincere about.

        If the Tories had a leader who didn’t have all the electoral appeal of a bucket of cold vomit like they have at the moment they could quite easily beat him out of sight.

        When are the Tories going to wake-up to reality?

        The unelected extra from the Jewel In The Crown is NOT an electoral asset.

        The Conservative Party (or, should that be, the Congress Party?) can’t get consistently above 30% in the polls let alone 34-35%.

        I would suggest if such figures don’t appear by the Autumn at the latest then the knives must start to be sharpened ONCE AGAIN!🤣🤣🤣🤣😀😀😅😅🤣🤣🤣🤣


  7. The Supreme Court Building is a very
    good looking building which is one of the most attractive in central London. I haven’t been inside but I have been near it last year when the Queen died.


    1. John:
      I think that the building was extensively modified when designated as the home for the new UK Supreme Court. It was not bad inside before, as I recall.


  8. British Taxpayers money should not be wasted on the Jew Zelensky and the Ukraine. Russia will win eventually. It is only a matter of time. Ukraine will not be able to hold off the vast military machine of Russia forever. Zelensky’s whims should not be indulged in as the risk of doing this continuously might well spiral the war out of control with the risk that Europe and this country becomes embroiled in a nuclear conflict.

    Loony tunes ‘Conservative’ (in reality, FAKE Tories) like the congential idiot that represents Bournmouth East, Tobias Ellwood, and the Labour moron, Sir Keir Starmer, might well be blasé at the prospect of nuclear annihilation and Britain being turned into irradiated ash but some of us more thoughtful members of the ordinary public view such an appalling prospect with alarm.


    1. John:
      This (a Third World War) is not (as some think) a mere one in a million possibility; it comes closer every day, and that means closer to *us*. The UK might be the prime target in any initial phase. There are large numbers of potential strategic targets here, from naval ports, airbases, and at least one base for nuclear submarines, to early warning stations, Internet hubs, concentrations of Western financial power etc.

      No-one sat down in 1914 and said “I know, let’s destroy our entire European world by a massive war”. No-one said, in 1939, “I know, let’s destroy the present world order, including all the European empires” (etc).

      Every day, the West ratchets the tension up a few notches. Tanks, missiles, longer-range missiles and a constant msm propaganda barrage on BBC, ITN, Sky etc, to bamboozle the masses.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s