Afternoon music
Tweets seen
“Issued with formal advice“? Myerson’s defaults were surely worse than those attributed to me in 2016, yet I was disbarred (it later turned out, unlawfully as well as wrongly) because I tweeted a mere 5 supposedly “offensive” tweets or retweets (out of over 150,000, over about 6 years). Justice? I think not. See https://ianrobertmillard.org/2017/07/09/the-slide-of-the-english-bar-and-uk-society-continues-and-accelerates/.
Jew-Zionist hypocrite Myerson, whose recent evidence on oath as a witness on the losing side of a significant legal case [Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon, and Cantor] was given little if any weight by a High Court judge, should be removed in short order as Recorder (p/t judge), and also disbarred, in my opinion.
Incidentally, Myerson belongs to the very organization that complained (via another Jew barrister, of whom I had previously never even heard) about me in 2014— “UK Lawyers for Israel” [“UKLFI”]; he also belongs to the malicious and conspiratorial “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”], which was behind other contrived and malicious complaints against me, such as the one that resulted in my being put on trial in November 2023.
Raus!
When I look at the MPs in the Westminster monkeyhouse, or at least 80%+ of them, what amazes me is the sheer patience (or is it lazy complacency?) of the British people.
Not very Parliamentary language, but truth is its own defence (or used to be…).
More music
More tweets seen
Not one mention of the fact that a million unwanted immigrants are entering this country every single year now. Cloud-cuckoo land. Madness.
More from James Wilson about his recent legal case
…and with all the Jewish persons involved, those students must have imagined themselves as extras in some sort of Hollywood film…
More tweets
“They” love to “report” people, but if it happens to them, they recoil in horror, and from that moment become, yet again, “innocent victims”.
As to Mark Lewis, he is an appallingly bad (bad in more than one sense) lawyer. He should be struck off the solicitors’ roll.
Lewis was always a self-publicist first and foremost. The Jewish lobby so embedded in the “British” msm has always given him a free ride, publicizing any legal successes (mostly very easy wins, such as the “Jack Monroe” defamation suit against Katie Hopkins), but keeping silent about the many times when Lewis has failed.
As previously blogged, I (unlike the seemingly well-meaning James Wilson) have no sympathy for the Jew-Zionist defendants. One has committed suicide, the other two are now as good as bankrupt, with one apparently likely to lose his family house, unless (and here’s the rub) he sues Mark Lewis, and possibly/probably the firm of which Lewis is a partner, Patron Law, in professional negligence and/or otherwise.
To recycle Lewis’s own arrogant boast, but with a twist, “someone can be a fanatical Jew-Zionist twister and lawyer, but at least they can be a bankrupt and struck-off one“…
Late tweets
Or deal with them another way, and so save the air fares.
That is unarguable.
I agree with Goodwin. What Mackinlay is suffering and has suffered, I should not wish on (most of) my worst enemies. However, it is not wrong or in bad taste to note that, throughout his time as MP, Mackinlay has voted, consistently, in Parliament to reduce social security/”welfare” benefits, including those paid to the sick and disabled.
Mackinlay and his wife have high incomes, and many “perks” etc. Many sick and disabled people struggle by without such privilege. I wonder whether his recent experiences have in any way changed his outlook on the life-challenges facing less-affluent people in the UK?
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/25437/craig_mackinlay/south_thanet/divisions?policy=6670
Get him on the train!
Idiots like that may be digging their own irradiated graves.
Never give “them” power…
https://twitter.com/Syribelle/status/1793387983111852518
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
Get LOST, Labour. My constituency of Brentwood and Ongar is entirely situated in the Essex Green Belt that surrounds ‘Stab City Upon The Thames’ (formerly known as London). For us, the Green Belt is not a luxury we can do without but an ESSENTIAL way to prevent the urban sprawl of London spreading ever outwards. We have been a safe Tory seat since the seat was created in 1974 so why should we put up with MAD Labour plans to ruin Green Belt areas because the Labour Party can’t be bothered to control immigration which will help to reduce demand for more housing? We, as a seat, have never endorsed the Labour Party so we didn’t give our consent for their open door immigration policies during their last disastrous period in office from 1997 to 2010. We still don’t give our consent to Labour and their globalist immigration policies now.
Southern Essex is not as rural as it used to be because we have ALREADY had two new towns built here since WW2 ie Basildon and Harlow. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
LikeLike
The water companies should be taken back into public ownership. These private companies have shown they simply can’t be trusted to do the right thing.
Mrs Thatcher went too far with her privatisation agenda in some ways but she never privatised what should be ie the NHS.
The NHS should be replaced by a mixture of state and private health insurance schemes as happens in Germany, South Korea which supposedly has the world’s best universal health care provision.
https://weownit.org.uk
LikeLike
Mrs Thatcher was sensible enough to steer clear of privatising the railways or the post office. Privatised railways can work but only in very limited circumstances such as in Japan where the vast majority of the huge Japanese population lives in a small coastal plain containing the cities of Tokyo and Osaka.
LikeLike
John:
Natural monopolies should probably always be run, if not by the State directly, then by some closely-connected national bodies. Rail, water, electricity distribution and (major) electrical production, postal services too.
LikeLike
Britain would benefit immensely with a lower population density. We would have that now if it had not been for grotesquely irresponsible immigration policies from 1997 to the present day.
LikeLike
You can safely bet that those “New Towns” proposed by Starmer will consist of shoddy buildings of the worst quality and will be used to house “refugees”
LikeLike
Claudius:
Absolutely inevitable. Poor town planning, poor architecture, not enough public parkland, not enough street trees, and full of non-white immigrants or their offspring.
37 Milton Keynes-sized towns? Disastrous for the environment, including the amenity-value of the countryside for British people.
Also, that would or will only be the beginning, as a million unwanted immigrants flood in, year on year, and breed.
LikeLike
The Green Party should be the party most in favour of ultra-tough immigration controls. Alas, like most Green parties around the world, they are more interested in being liberal-left, ‘woke’ and being a refuge for Jeremy Corbyn supporters from the Labour Party.
Someone should set-up a ‘Green Conservative’ party in this country. Environmentalism can belong just as much, if not more so, on the ‘Right’ of politics as on the ‘Left’.
LikeLike
Starmer’s policies basically amount to turning the whole of the United Kingdom into being a replica of townships like Soweto, South Africa or lawless Third World slums like our former capital city now known as ‘Stab City Upon The Thames’.
‘Raus’ as the Germans would say to Starmer and his virulently anti-British crew.
LikeLike
Apart from grooming gangs, what about another criminal activity beloved of ethnics in the main ie that of drug dealing?
Go onto Google’s search engine as I regularly do and pull up its image search function whilst putting in the words drug dealers and London, Manchester, Birmingham, Bradford etc and whole pages of our ‘enrichers’ will appear.
If we had proper punishments for drug dealers such as Singapore’s ‘Final Solution To The Drug Dealing Problem’ we could save some money on prison costs and create some new places in our stretched to the limit prison system. A stout piece of British rope doesn’t cost much!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Singapore
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misuse_of_Drugs_Act_(Singapore)
https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime
LikeLike
John:
British people do commit crimes, of course, but if the population were 100% white Northern European, the crime rate overall would be about a quarter of what it is, maybe even a tenth,
LikeLike
Of course British people commit crimes. This is all the more reason we shouldn’t import people from more naturally violent cultures than ours such as Jamaica. If one looks on Wikipedia, there is a page detailing the homicide rate of many countries per 100,000 people. Jamaica has a shockingly high rate.
Singapore’s drug laws are very harsh. Many people would say hanging drug dealers is too extreme even if a dealer sells tens of kilograms of hard drugs such as heroin. I think a credible case can be made for executions of drug dealers provided the capital threshold is set at a rate whereby the amount would, if it got onto the streets and was consumed, have a 99% plus chance of killing at least two people. Singapore’s capital threshold for drug dealing looks a bit low to me but I’m not an expert on the level of drugs that would guarantee deaths amongst abusers.
LikeLike
Gang rapes are a nasty and vicious crime but I don’t think they are worthy of an exceptionally harsh sentence such as capital punishment. Executions are the most severe sentence any criminal justice system can impose so they have to be used sparingly. Gang rapes should be punished by lengthy prison terms and judicial corporal punishment via the rattan cane.
Singapore uses executions for intentional murder, terrorism, drug dealing etc. Murder is the principle crime for the use of the death penalty but you can make a passable case for capital punishment for drug dealers if the capital threshold is set at an appropriate level.
Singapore uses these considerations as to whether or not to impose capital punishment for a criminal offence:
https://www.mha.gov.sg/home-team-real-deal/detail/detail/the-death-penalty-in-singapore
Those factors to consider seem to be fairly reasonable and a good way to decide what offences capital punishment should apply to.
https://www.mha.gov.sg
https://www.cnb.gov.sg
LikeLike
I would say a tenth.
LikeLike
That is a surprising announcement from Olaf Scholz. Up to now, Germany’s government has been as fanatically pro-Israel, if not more so, than Sunak and company. Indeed, their level of pro-Zionist zealotry has involved the German police cracking down hard on virtually all pro-Palestinian demonstrations even when they are entirely peaceful and the active suppression of pro-Palestinian viewpoints. Germany needs to remember its history but not totally obsess over it, take the wrong lessons from it and call persecution and genocide out when it sees it.
LikeLike
John:
Germany has little to regret, except that the British political leaders in 1940 were too stupid, or suborned, to maintain what Hitler wanted, i.e. “benevolent neutrality” (wohlwollende Neutralität).
LikeLike
I am talking about Germany not Britain. Personally, I think killing Jews in mass numbers even with many of them being pretty decent, non-Zionist, Ultra-Orthodox, non troublemaking ones IS something for Germany to regret its history over. Rightly, they have apologised for that episode and tried to make amends for it but they shouldn’t obsess over it and to do it proper justice REQUIRES them to point-out Zionist ill treatment and oppression of the Palestinians and not hide away in the corner to either pretend Israel’s disgraceful actions are not happening or, worse still, condone them.
LikeLike
That unwise and silly Yank might well cause Britain to become an irradiated mess as well. That is the danger of the UK belonging to the so-called ‘defensive’ alliance called NATO. Britain is sure to be a primary target should hot-headed Yanks like him poke the Russian bear too much.
LikeLike