Morning music
Tweets seen
600 in a day. Not counting those who sneak in on the backs of lorries etc. Not including the 3,000+ that entered superficially “legally”, on the same day (as “family members”, “students”, “fiances”, “fiancees”, those on fraudulently-obtained work visas etc, or as asylum seekers approved from outside the UK).
You still see pseudo-liberal idiots saying or tweeting that immigration is not a high priority in the UK’s list of problems to be dealt with. Think again. Immigration on this scale impacts everything, either immediately or later, and for endless years to come.
About a million a year, maybe more, and if some say it is “only” half a million “net”, does that really make much difference? So either 10 million in the next 20 years, or 20 million in the same time-period…
Goodbye Britain as anything other than a dystopian hellhole if that happens, i.e. if a real British Government does not stop it.
How many LibLabCon politicians could attract a crowd a twentieth as large? A crowd composed of ordinary local voters, by the way.
If you look at Twitter/X, as always very very unrepresentative, you will see people lauding the unemployed 25-y-o African “eternal student” who is the Labour Party’s bizarre choice of candidate. Frankly, that useless creature will be lucky to save his deposit; he will certainly not get more than 15% of the vote. This is between Reform UK and the Conservative Party whose candidate is invisible.
As a social-national blogger and thinker, I should prefer there to be a social-national party that I could support, even if a party not led by me. However, there is no such party in the UK at present.
In realistic terms, all that can be done at GE 2024 is to destroy one half of the main System binary, i.e. the Conservative Party, and to move the “Overton Window”, so that there is space into which social-national ideas and, then, a movement, can flow.
The best chance at present is that the “controlled opposition” Reform UK does well enough to destroy the Conservative Party, even if at the cost of a Labour “elected” (by default) dictatorship for a while.
I have a feeling that Israel-puppet Starmer’s plan to enfranchise persons of 16-17 years of age may backfire on him.
Ideologically, I do not always have time for pro-Israel, pro-Jewish lobby Katie Hopkins, but it has to be admitted that she is something else…Tough does not start to cover it.
I agree with her there.
Exactly. The NWO/ZOG System wants Israel-puppet Starmer as “elected” dictator. He will clamp down even more on (real) free speech (as practised on this blog), he will flood the UK with even more non-Europeans, and he will be more finance-capital friendly even than Blair, Brown, Cameron-Levita etc.
Starmer’s expected enormous Commons majority will enable the installation of a kind of “woke” tyranny. It is then that the British people will have to go beyond the usual kinds of “acceptable” opposition.
More music
More tweets seen
Sunak, saying that he “has been fortunate” in his life…Married, of course, to the richest Indian in India.
Sunak always reminds me of some of the contestants on shows such as The Chase, people that make me think, “you are so ******* ignorant; why are you even on a quiz show in the first place? You could not buy a correct answer“…
Sunak is a bit like that when he tries to show that he has what it takes to be Prime Minister of the UK. He plainly does not have what it takes. The little Indian money-juggler neither looks, nor thinks, nor behaves, nor speaks like a prime minister.
I happened to see a Sky News report this morning. 900 migrant-invaders have already been landed at Dover today, ferried in by the “Border Force” (border farce). All in identical orange lifejackets, all on a very large Border Force vessel, delivering them at a fast rate of knots to our shores.
900 in one single day (so far).
This is a conspiracy, the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, being carried on in plain sight, right under the noses of the public and the msm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalergi_Plan.
Metaphors…”begging bowl“; how about “dustbin”?
More music
More tweets
The Conservative Party candidate in the famous Smethwick by-election had a poster saying “if you want a n****r for a neighbour, vote Labour“. 60 years on, it turns out that the second part of the sentence should have read “…vote Labour, Conservative, LibDem, or Green“.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smethwick_in_the_1964_general_election
Interesting (even if Matt Goodwin, an academic, apparently needs to brush up on the use of the apostrophe).
Good idea.
Pity those trying to restrain the vandals did not give them the bejesus of a good kicking.
Israel has created ghetto-entities (Gaza, West Bank); cutting off oil via Turkey will ghetto-ize Israel itself.
“I’m lovin’ it!“
According to my use of Electoral Calculus [https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/userpoll.html], that would mean a House of Commons with 444 Labour MPs (overall majority 238), LibDems 65, Reform UK 50, Cons 45, SNP 20, Plaid Cymru 4, Greens 2 (etc).
If that were to come to pass, absolutely stunning. It would mean pretty much the end of the Conservative Party, certainly the end of it as a (let alone the) natural or default party of government.
For one thing, most of those wanting selection as Conservative candidates, and MPs, are careerists. Few will be attracted by a party that has only 45 MPs.
Donors are already withdrawing from the Conservative Party. Large donors usually want, at very least, influence in return for their money. A party which has only 45 MPs and is not the governing party, not the official Opposition, but only 4th in the Commons, has little to offer, little to sell.
If Reform UK really did break through to the extent indicated, the “Overton Window” will have been not only moved but blasted aside.
Social nationalism might then really start to take off. Exciting.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
Regarding John’s comment yesterday about ‘Life Without Parole’. We do have IPP (Imprisonment for Public Protection) in the UK, which means that prisoners who have completed their sentence can be held until they can prove they are no long a threat to the public.
Hard to believe our Government cares about our safety tbh. However, listening to former prisoner’s stories on youtube, ‘lifers’ and IPP’s can be a danger to fellow inmates and wardens. If a man has nothing to lose and already has the maximum punishment, he can do as he wishes (almost).
In the USA, (I don’t regard Americans as civilised people) they put prisoners to work in the fields and they can be held long past their release date. Since the prisons profit from prison labour, why would they release good workers?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8RJy7B59eA
LikeLike
A lot of prisons in the USA are privately owned. Some of ours are too and they have appalling records in many respects. To my mind, ALL prisons should be in public hands. State-run prisons normally have better records for preparing prisoners to be successfully released back into society.
Privatised prisons were yet another Tory lunacy invented by John Major along with his stupid privatisation of the railways in order to appease the ‘Right-wing’ of his party after he annoyed them over the ratification of the Maastrict Treaty.
It surely says it all that Mrs Thatcher avoided privatising the Royal Mail, the railways and prisons. If it was sensible to put them into the private sector she would have done it.
https://weownit.org.uk/public-ownership/prisons
https://weownit.org.uk
There is far more justification to abolish the NHS and replace it by a mixture of state and private health insurance schemes as in Germany, France, South Korea which supposedly has the world’s best universal health provision than there is for a privatised Royal Mail, prisons, railways, water companies ect.
When deciding upon whether to privatise a service/company a pragmatic approach is needed so that each is decided on its own merits.
About 95% plus services/companies should be privately owned/run but a few should be owned/run by the state.
LikeLike
The privatization of government-owned entities by Thatcher and all the PMs who have followed her, is a scheme to enrich LibLabCon’s (((wealthy donors))) by handing over all of Britain’s infrastructure and government services to (((them))).
The Tories even wanted to privatize the fire department prior to the Grenfell Tower disaster.
In addition to privatization, other schemes designed to enrich LibLabCon’s (((donors))) include Public-Private Partnerships, and Government-Owned Contractor Operated schemes.
For example, Britain’s only nuclear weapons plant, AWE Aldermaston, is now operated by a consortium that is 2/3 American-owned. The Royal Mint has been privatized. The neoliberal corporate puppet Thatcher is to blame for this corrupt nonsense.
Privatization and similar schemes have always been about enriching the (((elites))) who control LibLabCon.
Indeed, former Prime Minister Harold MacMillan understood this, which is why he accused Thatcher of giving away the family silver with all her corrupt privatization schemes.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
Yes. I support, in essence, the Threefold Social Order concept. As you note, many of the privatized entities or industries are such as to be more naturally run by the State. Prisons are an obvious example.
The State should not, generally, run actual businesses, but natural monopolies and near-monopolies are the exception— water, large-scale electricity production and distribution, gas distribution, water supply etc.
LikeLike
I am not sure whether I really approve of Life Without the Possibility of Parole (LWOP) or not. Yes, there is a case for the retributive punishment aspect of the sentence but then again you could argue that it is cruel to deprive someone of their liberty without ANY hope of release until the day the prisoner dies a natural death. Perhaps, you should still offer the prisoner a very small possibility of parole ie after a minimum term of fifty to sixty years plus.
As you point out LWOP sentences don’t come without some downsides. Someone sentenced to one CAN still commit crimes WITHIN prison such as murdering/seriously assaulting a prison guard or fellow prisoner and, as you say, if someone is sentenced to a prison term offering absolutely no hope of eventual release they will have both a powerful incentive and an awful lot of time on their hands to plan an escape.
The death penalty could be said to less cruel. Infact, in Italy there was a petition a few years ago done by several prisoners serving lifetime imprisonment that requested the Italian government to allow them to be put to death. They said that serving life in prison meant they, “died a little everyday”. Of course, an execution of a prisoner permanently incapacitates them so they can’t plan an escape and perhaps achieve it and potentially cause a risk to the public or murder/seriously assault a fellow prisoner or prison staffer.
In the well-governed, successful, economic miracle country of South Korea they still have the death penalty. There was a recent case there of a prisoner serving a very long sentence who murdered a fellow prisoner and because he had already been given the maximum sentence his further crime within prison merited his being given the sentence of death.
https://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org/thoughts.html
https://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_South_Korea
LikeLike
In my view, Life Without Parole and the death penalty are justifiable punishments for the most horrific crimes such as rape, sexual assault, murder, etc.
The muslim rapists who raped over a million little White British girls deserve the most severe punishments.
Of course, that will not happen under LibLabCon, since they serve j**ish interests, and the j**s like it when White people are harmed.
LikeLike
That is a bit harsh. Some Americans are civilised people. They seem to mainly be English-Americans, Scottish-Americans, Welsh-Americans, Ulster-Scot Americans and live in places like North Carolina, West Virginia, South Carolina, Utah, Tenessee, Virginia.
I must admit though their gun culture isn’t civilised really but the USA is a vast country so many people live in very rural areas far away from civilisation and can’t obtain easy access to the police or help in an emergency. Also, of course, some of the blacks there are very violently inclined so one gains security from being able to use a gun quickly. The gun culture is heavily tied-up with the nature of how America was built ie the frontier culture and its essential history as a land.
If you look on Wikipedia you will see an interesting article detailing different countries with their rates of police per 100,000 people. The USA has less than a million police officers which for a country that is wealthy, has over 300 million odd people and a huge land area is too low in my opinion. I think the police officer numbers of the USA could do with being radically increased. If they were to do this then their crime levels may decrease in time and there would be less of a reason for the ‘gun culture’.
LikeLike
Blacks in London also claim that they have to carry a knife for their own protection, even to school. Then they end up using it due to their low impulse control.
Where lefty liberal Mayors in the US have defunded the police, the corresponding rise in shop lifting has caused businesses to close down and move out. As those areas are usually heavily populated by blacks, the inhabitants claim those businesses are racist. Quite ironic really, especially when a NIKE flagship store closed their doors, as they had always supported BLM.
Not supporting shop lifting is racist against black culture.
LikeLike
When Britain finally gets a Pro-White government, all of the LabLibCon system politicians need to be arrested for treason and genocide.
These traitors like to pretend to care about “human rights” as a pretext for flooding Britain with violent diversity.
What about the human rights of the Indigenous White British people who are being demographically replaced and blended out of existence in their own homeland?
What about the human rights of the million little White British girls who have been raped by muslims and africans?
What about the human rights of the White British to exist as a distinct and cohesive people-group, and have their own country in the land of their ancestors?
All of the LibLabCon treasonous scum need to be arrested and put on trial for treason and genocide against the White British people.
LikeLike
After being given a fair trial in court and being in receipt of due process they, if found guilty, will be given either the death penalty or, and I am feeling generous here, a sentence of a minimum term of sixty years plus in an austere, specially built prison modelled on that of Alcatraz in the remote British overseas dependent territories of either Ascension Island or St Helena.
An additional sentence of hard labour will be imposed on top of the very long prison terms as well. Now, I can’t say fairer than that, can I?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Except that prison is also a punishment on the family of the accused and growing up without a father is surely detrimental to the development of male children.
LikeLike
Yes, prison is a punishment upon the convicted criminal’s family members but this is a necessary evil if we are to make criminals personally accountable for their crimes. We can’t abolish prisons as if we did we would have no functioning criminal justice system at all. Ideally, we should aim to keep people out of prison wherever possible but imprisonment for some is unavoidable and necessary to incapacitate them so that they can only commit any further crimes inside a prison rather than in society on the outside.
As Michael Howard once said, ‘Prison Works’. I must admit I quite enjoyed that famous party conference speech of his.
LikeLike
Sunak is a vile SNOB though quite what he has to be snobby about is, frankly, a real mystery. Of course, many of our own people are like that too but some of the people within the upper-class still have that old, patrician, sense of duty towards people less fortunate than themselves eg that young chap who is supposed to be the richest person in this country under the age of 40 who recently got married ie the Duke of Westminster who owns large parts of Belgravia and Mayfair and is a multi-billionaire. He does quite a lot of good work for his charitable foundation working with disadvantaged youngsters. He strikes me as a very decent young chap.
It would be far better to have him as Tory leader and PM than Sunak. I suspect the Duke of Westminster’s aristocratic British decency would win quite a few plaudits from the public and he would be far more popular with the ‘oiks’ and ‘plebs’ than Sunak. Sunak, by contrast, is completely classless and has no sense of compassion let alone duty to the less fortunate in society. Indeed, he would be the sort of City of London Banker yob who would burn a fifty pound note in the face of a homeless person whilst smoking a Cuban cigar.
If you were to design in a lab an imaginary Tory leader who would lose support on a vast scale it would be someone like Sunak.
He is totally incapable of relating to ordinary people and to be frank he isn’t a very nice person. He has all the popular electoral appeal of Adolf Eichmann turning-up at your average Bar Mitzvah party or someone letting off wind in a crowded lift.
A better ethnic choice would have been Suella Braverman not that she would be hugely more popular.
If a robotic drone like Starmer with no go in him, no charisma (not that I or anyone sensible regard that as an essential attribute in a PM) not a single fresh idea in his head ect is beating you in the popularity stakes then, frankly, you have a problem being a political leader.
LikeLike
I’m glad that the Tories chose Sunak. Someone like Braverman or Rees-Mogg or (((Boris))) or even Liz Truss would have kept the decades-old scam going, continuing to deceive voters into thinking that the Tories are patriotic and will save the country.
With a fake-patriot Braverman type in charge, the Tories would be able to continue their usual treasonous behavior of paying lip service to conservatism, while enthusiastically implementing (((cultural marxist policies))) behind their voters’ backs.
The fact that the Tory MPs picked Sunak (overruling the Tory members who picked Truss) has revealed the Tories as the traitorous globalists that they truly are.
After the Tories are destroyed on July 4th, they will ditch Sunak and undoubtedly try to revive their decades-old trick of pretending to be conservative while destroying the country.
They will elect a fake-patriot leader such as Rees-Mogg, Braverman, Jenrick, Mordaunt, or Mercer or (((Tugendhat))). They might even bring (((Boris Johnson))) back. Whoever they elect as leader will pretend to care about immigration, etc, while continuing the (((cultural marxist))) Blair-style globalist policies that the Tories have been implementing since 2010.
Hopefully the patriotic British voters will not be deceived by the Tories again. The rise of the Reform Party gives me hope that the Tory voters have finally realized that the Tory Party is irredeemably corrupt and treasonous with no intent of ever changing.
Hopefully after July 4th, patriotic British voters will look for a new rightwing party to support.
LikeLike
I doubt they will elect Rees-Mogg because his seat isn’t very safe. He will probably lose it. It would be quite funny if he stayed an MP though since there is no denying the ‘member for the Nineteenth Century’ has a certain comedic value. Some of his views resonate with me too. As a ‘Left Footer’, Rees-Mogg is in favour of tougher restrictions on the availability of abortion.
LikeLike
Who cares, Alan Alfred! Essex is supposedly one of the most ‘Right-wing’ parts of the UK politically-speaking. The fake Conservatives haven’t given us what we wanted from them so quite a few voters, including in Clacton, are turning to Reform UK instead.
Speaking on a personal level, I am not a huge fan of Reform UK as I believe the truly dire state the globalists of fake Tory and Labour have left this abused country in requires something stronger ie along the lines of Germany’s Alternative For Germany (Afd) party but Reform UK or the English Democrats ect will do for now.
The whole globalist, anti-British poltical consensus of fake Conservatives, Labour, Lib Dems, Greens ect needs to be unceremoniously smashed before this country will be making any real progress.
LikeLike
Farage (who openly brags about destroying the British “far right”), and the Reform Party are controlled opposition.
Farage has always been an opportunistic and unprincipled grifter who has served as a “safety valve” for the (((establishment))), to prevent disaffected White British voters from supporting parties who will actually help them, such as the BNP.
Despite the fact that Farage is a fake-patriot grifter, I still want to see him take away enough votes from the Tories to destroy them.
Once the Tories are out of the way, it will be much easier for ethno-nationalists to overtake and supplant the Reform Party.
That is because the Tories are a longstanding institution and have a nationwide organizational infrastructure, a long history, and the mindless support of gullible people who have voted Tory for generations.
The Reform Party has none of those things. Reform has only existed for a few years. All they have is Farage. It’s a one-man show.
With the Tories out of the way, there will be space on the right for a true ethno-nationalist party to grow and gain support.
Farage can be dealt with by moving the Overton Window even further to the right, by relentlessly attacking Farage as an unprincipled fake-patriot who betrayed both UKIP, and the Brexit Party in 2019.
LikeLike
Alan Alfred, it is better for Clacton to be insulted as the ‘Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana of Essex, England or the United Kingdom’ by globalist, anti-British snobs than for it to vote for a useless ‘Stab City Upon The Thames’ (London) Labour guy who has no connections with Essex, let alone, Clacton and whose party is virulently anti-British to the very core of its being.
LikeLike
Matt Goodwin, you CAN Be a social democrat or even a socialist and want to take tough action against criminals ie even the postwar Labour government from 1945 to 1951 operated the death penalty.
Socialism/social democracy should really be an economic point of view but our lefties mix it up with support for globalism, open borders, PC liberal values.
A very small party in Germany called Der Dritte Weg (The Third Way) wants to see a more socially just society but is in favour of ‘Right-wing’ social values like tough immigration controls ect.
LikeLike
You can be a socialist/social democrat and an anti-globalist nationalist at the same time. The Zionist state of Israel could be said to be National Socialist in some ways what with the socialist concept of the Kibbutz and its fiercely ethnic nationalist values.
LikeLike
The Roland Rat lookalike ( though the REAL Roland Rat SAVED TV-AM rather than destroy it) is a duplicitous liar as his farcical and worthless immigration pledge above indicates conclusively.
Disturbingly, a few months ago, he ranted on the steps of No.10 about his desire to shut people up and remove their freedom of speech from them. He targeted pro-Palestinian protesters with this unhinged rant most of whom have been protesting peacefully as far as I can see but make no mistake his very non British authoritarian streak is targeted at many more people than those who dislike the actions of the Zionist entity.
The diminutive despot has a dangerous lack of respect for freedom of thought and speech.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Rat
LikeLike
Alan Alfred, those words used by the Tory candidate in Smethwick in 1964 could and should have been better chosen. They were a touch dramatic but there was an essential truth in them.
What is ‘racism’ anyway? The globalists put a particular interpretation upon the word. The great REAL Tory, Enoch Powell, said once that all of the world’s people could be defined as ‘racialist’ in that this is only someone being aware of the differences between different races and skin colour is the LEAST important and most superficial one of them.
God created the different races. If loony globalists have a problem with what they define as ‘racism’ and/or ‘racialism’ I suggest they take it up with the man upstairs.
LikeLike
Enoch also said that race was the basis of nationality/ethnicity. What was wrong with his saying that?
LikeLike
Sunak hasn’t really done much work to become obscenely wealthy. Frankly, shuffling some figures around on a computer screen in the City of London hardly qualifies for such a description.
What annoys a lot of people in this country about some of the richest people is not their vast fortunes as such but HOW it has been acquired. Too many have become rich via essentially parasistical means such as hedge funds, high finance ect rather than being bosses of productive companies that contribute a lot to the foundations of an economy like BMW (One of Germany’s richest men is the boss of BMW). One of the most praiseworthy people on our ‘Rich List’ is James Dyson. I admire him more than Sunak.
LikeLike
John:
I agree with you about Dyson, on the whole (with reservations). Most wealthy people are wealthy, mainly, via inheritance. The Duke of Westminster (whom you frequently praise), would be a very good example of that fact.
LikeLike
Yes, the Duke of Westminster has acquired his vast wealth through inheritance but from what I have read about him he seems to be a very decent young man and does good work for disadvantaged youngsters through his family’s charitable foundation. He has that old, British aristocratic sense of duty towards helping people less fortunate than himself.
LikeLike
Those people voting tactically to change the government are a bit silly to put it mildly. There is no need to do it. At present. the Tories have about a 0.0001% chance of even being the largest party in a hung parliament let alone having 326 seats and ‘winning’ an overall majority of 1 seat.
The only slight chance of the Tories ‘winning’ is if the turnout collapses to ridiculous levels ie about 50% or lower and even then they probably wouldn’t ‘win’ because as by-elections have demonstrated very well indeed over the last two years huge numbers of Tories from 2019 are abstaining.
This ‘election’ was basically lost by the Conservatives in October 2022 when Liz Truss resigned and Sunak became PM instead of Penny Mordaunt.
LikeLike
John:
The mass of voters at GE 2024 are now not voting (inc. tactically) merely to change the government but to reduce the number of Con Party MPs to the smallest possible figure.
LikeLike
So, instead of voting for a candidate you don’t actually like just to get the Tories out, vote for who you REALLY believe in and want to win in your seat.
LikeLike
YouGov have released a poll today showing the Tories with 108 seats.
Very disappointing. I want them to have zero seats, or at least less than 50.
Come on voters! Destroy the treasonous, duplicitous Tory Party.
I have noticed that tactical voting is a big topic in the British media lately.
British patriots need to vote tactically to ensure that the treasonous Tory party has as few MPs (preferably zero) as possible after July 4th.
The destruction of the Tory Party is necessary to create a vacuum on the right where an ethno-nationalist party can grow and become a major political force.
LikeLike
You have to remember that some of the Tory-held seats are extremely safe. My constituency of Brentwood and Ongar in Essex is a very good example. In 2019, our Tory MP won by 29,145 votes and polled 36,000 plus votes on a turnout of 70%, had a percentage share of the vote of 68%, had a PERCENTAGE MAJORITY of 54.9% over Labour (with the Liberal Democrats a mere 0.1% further behind). The ‘swing’ required for it to fall is half that percentage majority ie a massive 27.5%.
As you can see, the opposition is very evenly split between Labour and the Liberal Democrats so which is the better tactical vote? In local politics, the Lib Dems have far more councillors than Labour and have had for many years so is that a better guide to the tactical situation?
At any rate, the Tory share of the vote is massive at 68% so it would need a fall in the Conservative Party’s share of 19% to get it to 49% where tactical voting could come into play.
We are their TENTH safest seat at the moment and I saw that the Survation MRP poll the other day reckons this seat, unsurprisingly, will survive the cull and then become the THIRD safest out of 74 seats left.
LikeLike
That Survation MRP poll reckoned the traditionally very safe Tory seat of Beaconsfield in the commuter belt of Buckinghamshire would become the new no 1 safest Conservative seat but it would only have a majority of about 18%. As many as 20 or so of the remaining 74 seats would be very close to falling with majorities of around 2%.
LikeLike
Sunak has precisely zero intention of reducing immigration.
It’s a deceptive ploy designed to win another term as PM for himself, and another term in parliament for his corrupt MPs.
If he somehow wins reelection, all immigration restrictions will be immediately abandoned, and it will be back to (((business as usual))).
Sunak’s claim that he will halve immigration is simply the latest Tory trick to deceive patriotic British people into voting for them. The Tories have been pretending that they will reduce immigration since 2010. Instead, they have increased immigration to the highest level ever.
The Tories have been pulling this scam for decades, pretending to support patriotic policies to win elections, and then enthusiastically implementing (((cultural marxism))) after they win.
LikeLike
Of course, he doesn’t. It is a scam designed purely to save some seats in an election which is likely to be their biggest ever defeat and which may resemble that of the wipe-out of the Progressive Conservatives in Canada in 1993.
Why would anyone with a brain believe him? This government’s record on controlling immigration is a total national disgrace. They can’t even be bothered to defend our borders from illegal immigrants in dinghies IN AN ELECTION PERIOD let alone during normal governing time. ‘Stopping The Boats’ was supposed to have been one of his five priorities.
At any rate, he is only promising to halve the legal immigration rate. That is simply not good enough. This country needs a 95% plus cut in legal migration, an end to the backdoor route of constant immigration ie the fraudulent ‘asylum’ scam and illegal immigration to be totally halted with a real start being made to deport the estimated backlog of one million illegals.
LikeLike
Ha, ha, I love the way Katie Hopkins puts down her left-liberal critics!
LikeLiked by 1 person