Morning music
My blog, my freedom of expression
Many readers will be aware that I was put on trial in November 2023 for having supposedly published 5 “grossly offensive” items on this blog; 5 items within 5 pages (5 days’ posts). 5 blog posts out of, at the time, about 1,700. I was sentenced in March 2024.
The background of that is known to some but not all readers. I therefore offer the following blog pages as explanation (obviously, I cannot republish or link to the 5 blog posts which were determined by the Court to have been, or to have contained material, “grossly offensive“, so here are 5 others).
I should add that, while 5 blog posts were determined, in the magistrates’ court, to have contained “grossly offensive” material (in fact, in my opinion, largely innocuous comments and cartoons), the material in question was tiny in amount, about 2% of each blog post, if that. In fact, only a few sentences allegedly written by me were specifically mentioned in the judgment.
As previously mentioned on the blog, I am perforce far more diplomatic now on the blog than I was a few years ago, but how sad it is that this country that, arguably more than any other bar the USA, championed free speech for so long, should fall victim to this kind of sub-“Stasi“, poundshop KGB-ism, with the Clown Prosecution Service and police falling over themselves to placate the Israel lobby.
Election thoughts
Labour leader Keir Flip-flop (Starmer) is the personification of the Norman Wisdom character, the clueless teaboy or whatever, who suddenly wins the lottery (or, in those 1950s days, the football pools). Starmer is about to become an “elected” dictator, despite most people despising, disliking or distrusting him.
Look, though, at what the Conservative Party now is. We are told that, if they survive the election, the leading contenders for the leadership position will probably be Kemi Badenoch (Nigerian), Priti Patel (East African Asian, and Israeli agent), James Cleverly (half-caste West Indian/British), and Suella Braverman (Mauritian Indian). All members of Conservative Friends of Israel, too.
Need one even comment?
We are told, also, that the polls say that 20% of eligible voters have not even decided whether they will vote at all, and are also undecided as to which way they might cast their votes if they do vote. Do we take it that many of those will simply abstain? Will they vote simply as protest? Uncertain.
It could just be that those “undecideds” will vote, will want to vote as protest, and so will mostly vote Reform UK. Were that to happen, it really would put the cat among the pigeons.
The fact is that the Conservatives are in deep trouble anyway, that the mere existence of Reform UK has deepened that existing trouble, and that, even at a nationwide 15%-19% (as per recent polls), Reform UK, while perhaps only getting a few seats, would spell doom for the Conservative Party. Which is why the msm is now going crazy trying to demonize Farage and his latest party.
If Reform UK actually scores above 20%, then game on. If the existing ~18% is boosted by another 5 or 10 points, then UK politics will have received a meteorite hit, and will never be the same again. Were Reform UK to get 28% of the national vote, that might mean 80-90 Commons seats, and Reform UK would be the official Opposition.
That may seem impossible or crazy, and it may not happen, but the exciting thing is that it actually could happen. You cannot compare Reform UK in 2024 to Brexit Party in 2019, or UKIP in 2015.
This time, the Cons are going to go down really badly. More importantly, there is a perception this time that to vote Reform UK is not a mere protest vote, but a protest vote that really could accomplish something concrete— the utter destruction of the Conservative Party for a start.
I do not know whether Reform UK will manage to get beyond its present 15%-19% range, and/or get as high as 28%, but it just might.
Talking point
Tweets seen
Britain has not had anything approaching such a statesman for a very very long time.
Not that I approve of everything Putin has done within Russia itself, and Russian society still does not have an ideology capable of consigning to the past Western finance-capitalism, the mainly Jewish (but also Russian-criminal) “bandit capitalism” of the past 30+ years, and the former harsh Marxist-Leninist ethos, out of which the “bandit capitalism” emerged.
Still, as a transitional but very significant political power-holder, Putin must be supported as far as necessary, as a bulwark against various poisonous and contending elements in the world.
“Fewer“, not “less“!
True all the same.
The policy is working so well as a deterrent that, even in the past couple of days, about 2,000 more migrant-invaders have entered the UK via the English Channel, ferried in by the RNLI and Border Farce.
All the System parties talk about “smuggling gangs”, but the smugglers could, in principle, be dealt with easily enough by special forces undercover. Dealt with. Just dealt with. The necessity is to deter or stop the migrant-invaders themselves, to close down the “small boats” cross-Channel route, and to protect both our borders and the future of our people.
Not a very impressive candidate anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Williams_(British_politician). 39 years old. His only non-political job was as a director of Cardiff Bus, a municipal bus service company owned by Cardiff Council; Williams was a councillor and on the relevant Council committee at the time. What a boondoggle.
Williams has been an MP since 2015, but lost his previous seat to Labour in 2017 and was then elected for another constituency in 2019. That constituency has now been abolished, and redrawn into the new constituency of Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr.
On the previous boundaries, the area was quite solidly LibDem until 2010, when the egregious Lembit Opik managed to ruin his political career by making plainly freeloading expenses claims and by playing around with young Romanian pop singers called the Cheeky Girls: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lembit_%C3%96pik.
While one might have expected Williams to continue the run of Conservative Party successes in the now-redrawn seat, the plunging popularity of the party, combined with Williams having tried to make an illicit profit by betting on the election date while obviously having inside information, may make him unelectable. We shall see.
The new constituency is being contested by Con, Lab, LibDem, Green, Plaid Cymru and, perhaps most interestingly, Reform UK.
Obviously, I have no idea how Reform UK will perform, and it may be that the LibDems have the best chance of getting rid of Williams, but if (a big if, as they say), Reform were to take half of the otherwise Con vote, then either Reform or the LibDems might succeed.
On the wider point, had something like this betting scandal occurred in, say, 1994, or 1984, let alone 1974 or 1964, the person implicated would have been expected to step down either as candidate or, later, as MP (if re-elected). The slide in integrity and honour in British politics is palpable. The bastard seems to be intent on riding it out, and hoping to get away with it.
Crowdfunder
A reminder that my modest crowdfunder (to help pay the costs imposed on me after my free speech trial) is still running: https://www.givesendgo.com/GC14J.
Late tweets seen
Ha ha! Anna Soubry, the notorious former “MP for Plymouth and Angostura” (she briefly threatened me online with a libel suit when I first tweeted that humorous description of her, many years ago, the silly creature), talks about Farage being “a gob shite“!
I can well understand why Anna Soubry has no mirrors around her, but she ought to take a good look at herself some time…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broxtowe_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2010s.
Ha. Yes, that is what is happening. A million migrant-invaders a year? Putin’s fault. Housing crisis? Putin’s fault. Nothing working properly any more in the UK? Putin’s fault.
If the “occupied” UK TV, radio, and newspapers disappeared tomorrow, the air would be cleaner.
Even 8 years ago, I was saying that “Brexit is more than Brexit“. Now, I say that people voting Reform UK are doing so for reasons far beyond, far far wider, than a limited wish to have Farage and his party get a few MPs.
Apocalyptic. God help anyone under that.
Our animal friends.
At what point will “they” have had enough blood?
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
How the Royal Family SHUT DOWN Investigations – Andrew Lownie.
Do we have free speech in Britain? Evidently not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agy9BBIB_nc
LikeLike
You are a brave man for standing up for the indigenous White British people, Mr. Millard.
Because you are courageous and you are loyal to your people, the (((system))) is persecuting you, and (((they))) dare to call you a criminal for the “crime” of loving your own people.
We live in an era where (((society))) calls good as evil, and evil as good.
The (((traitorous system))) is truly evil. (((They))) promote, glorify, and enrich the most treasonous members of society, while criminalizing the patriots.
A criminal conviction from such (((evil scum))) is a badge of honor.
Take heart. Many of the greatest people in history were convicted criminals. After all, Jesus Christ Himself is a convicted criminal, persecuted by the (((same group))) who persecute White patriots today.
I hope you will never give up your fight for the survival of the White British people.
Don’t let the (((evil system))) wear you down or cause you to become discouraged and give up. That’s what (((they))) want.
I hope you will always keep up the fight for the survival of the White British people, who are worth fighting for!
It’s an honorable and morally righteous fight. You are on the side of goodness, honor, loyalty, valor, and righteousness.
And Pro-White champions like you are appreciated more than you know, by the silent multitudes of White people.
If the Pro-White movement wins and saves our race, one day you and others who had the courage to publicly fight for and sacrifice for our race, will be remembered forever as heroes.
Keep fighting for the survival of the White race, and never give up!
God bless you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Friend of Britain:
Thank you. What will be, will be.
LikeLike
HEAR! HEAR!
LikeLike
Claudius:
Thank you.
We are only here once (in any given incarnation anyway), and not for long (in big-picture terms), so we should try to do what is right, as far as humanly possible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If the very much reduced rump of the fake Conservative Party elect a candidate from those ‘choices’ above to be their new leader they may as well pack their bags now and formally dissolve the party and deregister it with the Electoral Commission.
They STILL DON’T GET IT, do they? With any luck, the Labour Party will kick them all out of parliament. Tactical voting should certainly be endorsed in those particular constituencies.
Seriously, what sane political party would have pretty much any of them for its leader with the very slight and only very partial exception of Suella as its leader even in the best of political times let alone after their expected heaviest defeat in TWO CENTURIES?
I think the Conservative Party has pretty much reached the end of the road now. Time to put it out of its misery and replace it with something better.
I see that failed ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer, Phillip Hammond, has said that Nigel Farage should have no place in British public life and not in the Conservative Party either.
That is the Tory Establishment way of trying to win friends and influence people!
LikeLike
Yes, whatever someone’s opinions on President Putin are there can surely be few people in the world who would deny the fact he is a real leader for his country.
Compare him to the amoral, often corrupt and on the make, intellectually vacuous, treasonous little shysters we have in that falling down House of Treason in Westminster.
LikeLike
John:
Politics is the art of the possible, it is said. I am too much of an idealist to be a pure Realpolitik person, but realism must be the core of policy.
LikeLike
The fake Conservative Party hasn’t been doing its job for far too long now being the libertarian, globalist, pro open borders supporting party that is is instead of what it should be ie a traditional, national-conservative party.
They take-up valuable political space that should belong to others. This smelly turd needs to be flushed so well the smell doesn’t continue to linger.
LikeLike
Make a date in your diary! Independence from utterly useless Tories day is July 4th 2024.
The Conservative Party 1834-2024 RIP. Never has a poltical party so betrayed its own natural supporters as they have over the last 14 years in particular.
LikeLike
https://www.facebook.com/TheTraditionalBritainGroup
https://traditionalbritain.org
LikeLiked by 1 person
The “Miss Zimbabwe” affair was very funny. That proves that “White Supremacists” are winning ground there! (LOL) Seriously, what a sick joke! When these obnoxious creatures take over our lands and history is OK, but if one White person achieves something in their crappy countries is a national disaster! Give me a break!
LikeLike
Apparently, the Tories are worried about holding the constituency of Richmond and Northallerton in North Yorkshire. Supposedly, they are putting in extra resources to try and retain it. The local MP is said to have annoyed the large military vote at Catterick Garrison in the constituency with his D Day blunder.
On paper, it should be an absolutely safe ‘rock solid’ seat for the Tories but perhaps with enough tactical voting Labour may just topple a sitting PM which would be a FIRST in British history.
Come on, good people of Richmond and Northallerton you know what to do! Just give little Rishi a little extra push over the edge to defeat and utter humiliation!
Now, needless to say, I can’t stand the Labour Party but if I were a voter there I would be very, very tempted to break the habit of a lifetime and vote Labour with a tactical vote to help Rishi lose his seat. Then, after doing the deed, I would repent of my sins and give my hands a good scrub with some soap and water.
If it happened, the Tories would never live it down and it would certainly beat the ‘Were You Up for Portillo’ moment in 1997.
LikeLike
John:
LikeLike
I can see Reform UK getting a plus 20% vote share as that opinion poll indicated the other day but not more than 25%. 25% would be their maximum unless something very dramatic happens I think.
LikeLike
John:
You may be right, but at the same time many may be so disgusted by the state of the country that they will vote Reform UK as a way of protesting, and also hitting the Cons *and* in the hope that something more may come out of it.
LikeLike
Presumably that MP was one of their legions of dimwits who voted in Rishi as PM instead of Penny Mordaunt. I think his seat has become a ‘white flight area’ for English refugees from Birmingham, Coventry ect and that probably explains the increasing Tory vote there as opposed to the high Lib Dem vote share the constituency was previously strongly associated with. Fancy probably being aware of the fact your seat has become more Tory overtime because of its ‘white flight status’ and then voting for Rishi to be PM instead of Penny Mordaunt.
Many of their MPs are not what you would call politically astute, are they?
LikeLike
John:
The problem, or one major problem, with many Con and Lab MPs is their limited background. A Mickey Mouse degree, pref. from Oxford, no outside-politics jobs (esp. at ground-floor level), no military exp., no experience of financial struggle etc. In a word, many are basically green, and/or silver spoon types such as Zac Goldsmith.
LikeLike
Zac Goldsmith does come from a very privileged background but in my opinion he is pretty intelligent and quite thoughtful about some issues particularly the environment. He certainly couldn’t be classed as one of their typical backbench deadheads. Zac is a ‘Green Conservative’ and there is nothing wrong in that. Indeed, many would argue persuasively that a concern for the environment belongs more naturally on the ‘Right’ or ‘conservative’ wing of politics than it does on the ‘Left’.
LikeLike
A great deal of this is because of fake Conservative Party misgovernance over the past fourteen years:
https://christianconcern.com/comment/we-have-demolished-the-family-but-there-is-hope.
Gay ‘marriage’ should not have been introduced as it introduced the idea of marriage being a purely gender-neutral space ie it radically altered the essential basis for the societal institution. It has helped to remove the idea of biological sex meaning anything in society hence the rise of ‘gender ideology’ since 2013. Less people are getting married now as well as marriage isn’t seen as anything particularly unique or special.
Civil unions/partnerships for gay couples were fine but introducing gay ‘marriage’ was a step too far. We should have remained like staunchly Roman Catholic land Italy with gay civil unions/partnerships but with ‘traditional marriage’ preserved.
https://www.c4m.org.uk
https://christianconcern.com/articles
In the past, the Conservative Party used to pride itself as being ‘the party of the family’. It is no longer.
LikeLike
https://christianconcern.com/comment/the-demise-of-normal-family-does-it-matter
LikeLike
Judging by his photo, that fellow Craig Williams must have an IQ between 80 and 90 which, according to the Stanford-Binet classification of 1937 (still valid), means “Low average/Dull”
Incidentally, yesterday I watched a video by Prof. Edward Dutton about Prince Harry´s IQ (the subtitle read: “Why is it so low” LOL) Dutton gives him an IQ of 90-105 which means “Average” but he then contradicts himself by pointing out that he had considerable “help” from his teachers at Eton and Sandhurst who obviously were under pressure to gave him better marks. Therefore his real IQ must be lower (80-90) which, according to the Wechsler 1958 Classification is “Dull”, which means “Below Average”
Several people who commented on that video said that if Harry did not have all the help he got he would have never graduated and would be working at Tesco´s and I believe that.
PS: His brother is not much better, he looks like a goof and I am sure he is one.
LikeLike
Claudius:
The “Windsor” line is notably dull, and always has been. Look at, eg, George VI, or really any of the post-1945 “royals”.
Even Edward VIII, though I commend his wish for peace between the British Empire and the German Reich, was a fairly dull fellow overall.
Of course, “IQ” can only take you so far. I believe that Marilyn Monroe supposedly had a “higher IQ” than Albert Einstein!
I was tested, but long ago, about 35-40 years ago, at 156, i.e. in top 1% of population, but that was then! When you are older, your experience fills the gaps, I believe.
LikeLike
Your score is truly spectacular and proves that brains do not guarantee success (sorry about that!) I was never tested and I am curious about it; I will try to find some serious IQ test online.
Here is some interesting information about IQ tests and intelligence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_classification
LikeLike
Claudius:
Tell me about it…
The Mensa organization has such tests; they may suit you:
https://mensa.org.uk/
LikeLike
Talking about the Windsors I am not surprised that they were already considered as a dull bunch, I remember reading an article about King George V that described him as a fairly unsophisticated and dull fellow, a fact that has been confirmed as I read more about him. His sons were not better, the famous Edward VIII was unanimously considered a “low-brow fellow” as his brother. I remember reading that the Queen Mother was also fairly thick, when she was asked who was her favourite writer she answered “Dick Francis”.
When you think of the wonderful opportunities they had/have to develop their intellect and better themselves and how they ended up, it is quite logical to become a staunch republican. BTW, the only acceptable republic is a truly aristocratic one like Rome.
LikeLike
Claudius:
Indeed. Also, the Queen Mother was by no means as “nice” as she was portrayed in the Press etc.
At Ascot (racecourse), there always used to be (maybe still is, don’t know), at a National Hunt (jumps) meeting in, I think, December, a tradition whereby the late Queen would always distribute chocolates to children in the Members’ Enclosure.
In the early 1980s, both my mother and one of my brothers were Members (and in my brother’s case, an owner, actually “part-owner”, he part-owning at one time one or two horses, including (I think a few years later) a quarter of a horse called Walk the Beat, which got a creditable third place in a pretty big flat race one year).
My mother was at Ascot at that jumps meeting when the Queen gave out those chocolates (only Cadbury’s, and probably supplied to her gratis by the company).
My mother went forward with my then girlfriend’s little girl (aged about 6 or 7). The Queen gave her a bar of chocolate (a very thin one; not sure whether they are still made).
The little girl politely thanked the Queen. Then, said little girl could not get out and away, because the crush of other children and in some cases pushy parents was too great, so she was still there a minute later, when the Queen Mother came along, also giving out chocolates.
The Queen Mother stopped by the little girl, looked fiercely at her, and snapped “has the Queen already given you chocolate, child?” The little girl was too shocked to reply, so just looked at her, whereupon the Queen Mother apparently looked as if she might move on, then bad-temperedly added, “oh, well, child, there you are”, and quickly gave her another thin bar (I think they were originally called Penny Bars), before moving along. My mother was nearby, and saw and heard it all.
LikeLike
I believe you. In fact, I am inclined to believe anything bad about the Royal family.
LikeLike