Tag Archives: elections

Alt-Right, Andy Burnham, Angela Rayner, Campaign Against AntiSemitism, daily blog, Defence, diary blog, elections, environment, free speech, historical, historical revisionism, Ian Millard, immigration, Jewish lobby in UK, Labour Friends of Israel, MPs, Party Politics, Russia and Russian relations, Sam Melia, society, Sophie Meaden, Starmer, the woodlander, Uncategorized

Diary Blog, 11 May 2026

2 Comments

Morning music

Tweets seen

Wes Streeting, a violent-online gayboy and Israel/Jewish lobby puppet (member of Labour Friends of Israel). He did not only tweet (or otherwise write online) about pushing women (I think, more than one) under trains but also —if memory serves— about killing others.

Altogether a very strange person to be Secretary of State for Health (or anything else).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wes_Streeting

At one time, half a century ago, it was joked that the real division in the Soviet Union was between the drinkers and the non-drinkers. Well, in the UK of 2026, it seems that the division in Labour is between different factions of the Israel-lobby, one arguably less, er, deviant than the other.

[“Former Mossad director Tamir Pardo harshly criticized the actions of Israeli authorities in the West Bank, stating that violence by settlers is systemic and reminiscent of Germany actions during World War II. Israelis are setting fires, attacking local Palestinians, and taking their land.”]

Well, look at that… According to Jew-Zionist liars and perjurers of the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” type, to compare Israeli actions with those of the German Reich of 1933-1945 is “antisemitic”.

Will the whining and “demanding” “CAA” goblins now “demand” that a former Director of MOSSAD be regarded as “antisemitic”? Farcical.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamir_Pardo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arooj_Shah

Harriet Harman is a criminal enemy of the British people, and now wants to give peerages to (more) useless and criminal Pakistanis…

Wall. Squad. End.

These individuals are enemies of the people, and must be dealt with accordingly.

White Europeans created almost everything of value in Africa, contrary to what the msm propaganda usually claims.

You only have to see washed-up Irish scribbler and talking-head (and puppet of the Jewish/Israel lobby), Kevin O’Sullivan, “interviewing”, on the bad-joke Talk TV online “TV station”, such as Stephen Silverman of the Jew-Zionist fake “charity”, “Campaign Against Antisemitism”. No attempt to challenge Silverman even slightly or politely. No attempt to question his integrity and motivations, despite his background of attempts to pervert the course of justice, his repeated wasting of police time, or his pseudonymous online trolling of women in past years. Etc.

Quite.

Does that mean that Netanyahu and others, such as Ben Gvir, will end up being hanged? Maybe so.

There were only a few hundred there anyway; maybe 500, 600.

There are 250,000-300,000

Talking point

[“British cops await man off AIRPLANE for a ‘racist’ post he wrote on FACEBOOK

12000 people are in jail for expressing their consitutional right of Freedom of Speech.
Most of them for commenting on the Terror State of Israels well documented and even in the International Court of Justice convicted crimes against humanity.

Meanwhile the British police has not arrested a single jew who publicly advocates for killing all Palestinians or all white people.“]

The same “generosity” (with taxpayer millions) is seen in the UK.

Another puppet of the Israeli/Jewish lobby.

A remarkably stupid “analysis” from that self-styled “journalist”. Hardly any UK governments over the past half century or more have enjoyed popular-vote majorities, and most MPs likewise are elected on less than 50% of the vote (often below 40%, and occasionally below 30%).

It may be true that, in most if not all constituencies, Reform UK could be beaten were all non-Reform voters to vote tactically for the most likely non-Reform candidate, but only those who prioritize beating Reform above all other issues and motivations would do that.

Indeed, the rise of the NSDAP in Germany was not swift and overwhelming. It took 14 years for the NSDAP to become the unchallenged government (in 1933), and 13 years for it to enter government at all (in 1932). In 1928, the NSDAP had a popular vote of only 2.6% nationwide, but by 1932 that vote had increased to about 33%, and in 1933 reached 44%.

That tweeted report says that, out of 19,000 council seats in England, Reform hold fewer than 2,500. True, but the “reporter” failed to add the fact that only 4,850 of those 19,000 council seats were actually up for election on 7 May 2026, by reason of our antiquated and stupid local electoral system.

Reform gained nearly 1,500 seats on 7 May, about a third of the seats actually up for election.

Were all 19,000 council seats to have been contested last week, it is highly likely that Reform would have done as well across the board, and now have over 6,000 councillors, quite likely many more.

Incidentally, the fake “journalist” there, Jack Dart, was a LibDem councillor at Torbay during 2019-2023, but was found guilty of malpractice. He has never been any sort of recognized journalist, even in local press or online outlets.

Jack Dart dropped out of a law degree course in 2018, and in the second year. He has never had a job except for some online campaigning against Brexit and for such bodies as the pro-migration “charity”, “Care4Calais” (best known for the egregious sexual and fraudulent activities of its founder, Clare Moseley).

Jack Dart also runs, or ran, a pro-Starmer website and online campaign called Hold the Line. That went well…

Some partisan voices are yet worth listening to, at least at times. Not that one.

More tweets seen

That Jew tweeter, referring to Der Sturmer, is “mistaken”. The newspaper was a satirical publication owned and operated by Julius Streicher. While it certainly supported the NSDAP, it was not an official NSDAP or German government newspaper: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_St%C3%BCrmer; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Streicher.

[Jerusalem in 1937]

Late tweets

Sarah Sackman, another Zionist Jewish individual in both law and politics in the UK.

Both the Attorney-General and the Solicitor-General are Jewish, despite the fact that Jews only make up about half of one percent of the population as a whole. What are the odds?

What can they do, though, when the whole pack consists of jokers?

Almost certainly correct but, as previously blogged, when some political favoured niece or nephew takes over as Prime Minister by default, and prefers not to get politically validated by the electorate via a fairly swift general election, chances are that he or she, and also the political party (in this case, Labour), are toast; lame duck government followed by crushing electoral meltdown in the end.

I wonder who the surviving 5 Labour MPs would be.

A state founded by the sweepings of the European ghettos, prisons, and labour camps.

Late music

Alt-Right, animal welfare, Conservative Friends of Israel, daily blog, diary blog, elections, environment, free speech, historical, Ian Millard, immigration, Jewish lobby in UK, Kemi Badenoch, Labour Friends of Israel, Matt Goodwin, MPs, Nick Griffin, Party Politics, permaculture, prepping, rewilding, Rupert Lowe, society, Sophie Meaden, Starmer, Tucker Carlson, Uncategorized, wildlife

Diary Blog, 9 May 2026

4 Comments

Morning music

[Havana, Malecon]

Saturday quiz

Well, this week only 4/10, but thereby again beating political journalist John Rentoul, who scored 3/10. I only knew the answers to questions 1, 4, 5, and 8.

As to the other questions, I only remembered the answers to questions 2, 3, and 9 once I looked up the information, guessed wrong on question 10, and had (and still have) no idea as to questions 6 and 7.

Tweets seen

My assessment from several years ago (“Trump is a loudly-squawking parrot in a gilded cage, surrounded by a phalanx of Jews“) turns out to have been completely accurate.

Applied to a general election, would translate to a Commons with about 323 Reform UK MPs (3 short of a majority), 87 Greens (weak official Opposition), 81 LibDems, 50 Cons, 45 SNP, and 37 Lab [etc].

It now goes without saying that, on those figures, Starmer-stein would lose his own seat.

Almost no-one these days uses the word “decimate” properly, and that Schofield scribbler is no exception.

Import such populations, import their ways of doing politics and/or business and/or crime. If you want to get rid of those behaviours, you pretty much have to get rid of the populations.

At this point, Starmer the Nation-Harmer morphs from being a would-be “world leader”, and pathetic would-be bully-dictator, into a Norman Wisdom imposter-syndrome figure, the lowly [fill in his job] who is mistaken for a political leader and then makes all sorts of odd decisions.

As for Gordon Brown, a near-lunatic married to a wife who always struck me, when I saw the couple on TV at public occasions, as akin to a psychiatric nurse in charge of a patient having an outing.

Ha ha. System mouthpiece Andrew Marr once again comes out to bat for Blair-Brown Labour.

Apart from puffing Gordon Brown’s premiership, 16+ years on, Marr says as little as possible about “Harriet Harperson” and nothing at all about the real concerns of millions of British people. His list of issues mentioned did not even include mass immigration, which is tearing this country apart.

Actually, if you want to use the hackneyed “traitor” gibe, there are few better candidates:

An enemy of the British people.

Incidentally:

“Regarding his political affiliations, he was formerly a Maoist and a member of the Socialist Campaign for a Labour Victory, a left-wing pressure group founded by Labour Party members, now known as the Alliance for Workers’ Liberty. His interest in Mao Zedong began as early as age eleven, when he gave fellow Craigflower School students copies of the Little Red Book that he had requested and received from the Chinese embassy.[12][13] His affinity for Maoism continued into his time at Cambridge, where Marr says he was a “raving leftie” who acquired the nickname “Red Andy“.

[Wikipedia]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Marr

A Maoist as a university student, so as late as 1978 (Mao died in 1976).

Does not say much for Marr’s political judgment.

It is one thing to be a “Maoist” aged 11, as Marr was, or thought he was —I too had two “little red books” (Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-Tung, and On People’s War by Lin Piao) given to me when I was a similar age, in my case in 1967 in Australia— but it is surely different when the person is a hopefully more mature 18-21, and in 1977 or even 1979. Incredible…

[“In normal circumstances, Keir Starmer’s appointment of Gordon Brown as his special envoy on global finance and Harriet Harman as his adviser on women and girls would be seen by Labour MPs as sensible. Tapping the wisdom of the party’s elders to solve important problems would be viewed as competent if dull technocratic government.

However these are not normal circumstances for the Prime Minister. His MPs see him as responsible for yesterday’s electoral catastrophe. He indeed has insisted he does take full responsibility.

And that is why the appointments are in fact incendiary. Because they are seen as – at best – irrelevant to the crisis faced by the government, and for many MPs and ministers they are provocative, an insult, a manifestation – in the words of one minister – “that he simply doesn’t get it.”

This is what one senior and influential member of the government told me:

“The Harriet and Gordon thing and his Guardian article [in which he said the government should neither move left or right] has annoyed Labour MPs even more. It’s tone deaf. I think people give him until Monday to actually show he gets it or he’s done.”

To be clear, this minister would often try and defend the PM. Not any more. And that’s not altogether surprising, given that few Reform voters are likely to say “I was thinking of voting for Nigel Farage but I’ve changed my mind now that Keir has tapped Gordon to create an international off-balance-sheet finance facility for defence spending.”

Another minister told me that the preference of MPs and Labour’s members would be for Starmer to stay and turn around the performance of the government, but they were increasingly doubtful he was capable of doing this.

This minister’s mood, and that of his colleagues, he said, “was increasingly of despair”.

Perhaps the biggest problem was that Starmer “is seemingly unable to give a clear coherent sense of direction for the country.”

“Voters will forgive you many of your mistakes if you can tell them where you want to take them. But he has been incapable of doing that, and none of us know whether he ever can.”

Even those members of the Cabinet who are genuine loyalists talk about him on the basis of hypothesis and guesswork. None of them seem to actually know what makes him tick or what he wants (one told me he was planning to set out his own policies more publicly in the hope that perhaps the PM would adopt them).

In that sense Starmer seems more isolated than any prime minister I’ve ever known.

A very big test for him comes on Monday, when he is expected to give a speech that will be billed as his agenda for the rest of the parliament but is in practice a plea to his MPs to give him a last chance.

I asked a minister what MPs would need to hear to be clear that he does understand their concerns, that he “gets it”.

This was the reply. “I mean god knows because I dont think he does. It’s not anything anyone else can tell him it has to come from him.”

And that, in a nutshell, is why Starmer is in so much trouble.“]

I sense, though, that the mainstream political scribblers and talking-heads still have not quite got their heads around what is happening. It is not all about Starmer-stein. Public dislike of the bastard is certainly more focussed than is dislike of the old Lab and Con parties, but what we are seeing now is rejection of the whole LibLabCon rigged political system that has been a fixed state in the UK going back certainly to 1945 and arguably to around 1900.

If you listen to the tramline minds of Andrew Marr and his type, you may think that all that Labour has to do to recover its prestige and vote is to swap one sinister clown for another, whether it be Andy Burnham, Yvette Cooper, or even Angela Rayner. No. Just no.

More tweets seen

[“Remember the absolute disaster when Gordon Brown sold off 395 tonnes of Britain’s gold at the worst possible time?

He even told the market he was doing it beforehand, which made the price tank even more. Classic.

Well, gold’s gone up about 1500% since then. That same gold would be worth around £40 billion more today.

Well, Starmer’s brought him back as his Finance Envoy.

You honestly couldn’t make this shit up!“]

[“Let’s check in on Beatrice.

Beatrice is a four-year-old Light Sussex hen in the back garden of a retired widower in a Yorkshire village. She arrived three years ago with three other hens, brought by his daughter to “give him something to look after.” It worked. He talks to them. He pretends, to himself, that he doesn’t.

Beatrice has been busy this morning.

5.42am. Beatrice exits the coop first. She is always first. The other three hens, by long arrangement, wait. The arrangement was not agreed in writing. The arrangement is, by every working measure, in force.

5.51am. Beatrice locates a slug on the lower lavender. She eats the slug. The label on a supermarket egg box would describe Beatrice as “vegetarian-fed.” Beatrice has not read the label. The slug, by 5.52am, is no longer the slug.

6.18am. Beatrice eats a worm turned up by the man’s spade in the vegetable bed. The man is digging the bed because Beatrice has, by long observation, taught him that digging the bed at 6.15am produces worms, which produces hens nearby, which produces a small social arrangement that the man has come to look forward to.

7.04am. Beatrice eats a beetle. She eats it with the considered focus of a hen who knows that beetle protein is, by every measure, the highest-quality protein available to her, and that the beetles do not, on the whole, last long once identified.

8.30am. Beatrice lays an egg. The egg weighs 64 grams. It contains, by every available analysis: a complete amino acid profile, choline, lutein, zeaxanthin, B12, vitamin D, vitamin A, selenium, iodine, and cholesterol of the kind that the human body, contrary to forty years of dietary advice, regulates by itself. The egg is, by every honest nutritional measure, one of the most complete single foods on earth. The man eats it for breakfast at 8.45am.

10.00am. Beatrice eats the man’s vegetable peelings. Carrot tops. Cabbage stalk. The end of a leek. A small piece of stale bread. This is, in industrial poultry terms, an unauthorised diet. In actual hen terms, it is the diet hens evolved on for several thousand years before anyone thought to feed them only one thing.

11.30am. Beatrice kills a rat. It is the second rat she has killed this year. She does not eat the rat (rats are too large) but she does, with great commitment, prevent it from getting near the feed. Beatrice is, by quiet local agreement, the most effective pest-control system in the village.

1.15pm. Beatrice naps in a dust bath of her own construction. The dust bath has been positioned, by Beatrice, in the precise spot in the garden that gets afternoon sun for the longest. She did not ask the man’s permission. She did not need to.

3.40pm. The man, in the kitchen, calls her name.

Beatrice comes.

She does not come for the daughter. She does not come for the postman. She comes for the man.

Things Beatrice has, in one ordinary day, debunked:

That hens are vegetarian. They are not. They are obligate omnivores, and the supermarket “vegetarian-fed” label is, by every honest reading, a deficiency diet sold at premium prices.

That eggs are bad for you. Forty years of dietary advice, substantially walked back since 2015. Eggs are now, in most modern guidelines, considered one of the most nutrient-dense foods available.

That chicken farming is, by definition, cruel. Industrial poultry, in many cases, is. Beatrice’s life is not. The honest argument targets the system, not the species.

That backyard hens spread disease. The disease vector data points overwhelmingly at intensive operations. Beatrice’s three companions and the half a million UK households who keep small flocks are not the problem.

That eggs are a luxury. The man pays approximately £15 a year per hen in feed. He gets, in return, around 280 eggs, two dead rats, a worked vegetable bed, a dust bath in the right spot, and a small quiet relationship with a creature who comes when he calls.

Beatrice is, by every honest measure, the smallest unit of working agriculture in Britain.

She is also, by quiet local consensus, the reason the man still cooks a proper breakfast.

Eat the egg.

Be the hen.

Resource the backyard.“]

Our animal friends.

“Preppers” are far better off with an acre of land and a few chickens than they are with a supply of pre-packed military-surplus MREs.

Start with Kemi Badenoch.

“Slightly...”? A total loonie, as well as being, on most issues, totally wrong.

A genuine, well-funded, properly led, and ideologically-disciplined social-national party could sweep the board; and if the (((usual suspects))) were to rig the electoral system against it, it would have the people and the will to take power without elections.

Your “worse” may be our “better”…

Nick Griffin’s blog

https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/so-you-think-you-can-win-an-election

More tweets

[“Rajiv Menon KC, a highly respected silk at Garden Court Chambers and a former head of chambers, is facing proceedings for contempt of court. The alleged contempt concerns a closing speech that Rajiv delivered to a jury at the Woolwich Crown Court in January 2026. The trial involved pro-Palestine activists causing criminal damage to weapons and other property at a factory in Filton, Bristol belonging to Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest arms manufacturer.
Not only is this the first time in English legal history that a barrister is being prosecuted for contempt in respect of a closing speech at a criminal trial, but the procedure being used to prosecute Rajiv is wholly novel and without historical precedent.

Until this week, any publication about Rajiv being prosecuted for contempt has been prohibited by various court orders. As a result of reporting restrictions now being lifted, Garden Court Chambers is at last able to comment publicly on this matter. We have supported Rajiv throughout the proceedings, including significant numbers of our members attending court hearings at the Royal Courts of Justice.

Rajiv is independently represented by solicitors and leading counsel who have made powerful arguments about the jurisdictional legality and procedural propriety of the contempt proceedings being brought against Rajiv. Judgment is currently awaited from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division). It is hoped that the arguments being advanced will prevail, and that the proceedings against Rajiv will be swiftly concluded without Rajiv having to stand trial. Whatever the outcome, Garden Court Chambers will continue to support Rajiv.

It is important to note that the prosecution of Rajiv for contempt has wider constitutional implications. We are extremely concerned about the chilling effect on the Bar of the state seeking to criminalise barristers for their representation of their clients. Such action is bound to undermine the confidence of the public that those charged, particularly in political and controversial cases, can receive the committed representation that they would expect to be provided.“]

Where “they” (((they))) take over or even exercise much influence in any society, no other groups or individuals have any rights or freedoms.

Global society, not just UK society, needs to cut down the massive wealth of the few. The utter banality of the Musk and Bezos type can be seen in their competition in the field of rocketry, all so that wealthy tourists will be able to tour around the Moon or beyond. For all the incredible technical achievement, not really serious work.

As for Musk believing that Mars can be colonized, it’s just nonsense.

Late tweets

A game that the LibDems have played, and before them the Liberal Party, for many decades. Default option for those unable or unwilling to support Lab or Con (and now, Reform or Green).

It really exposes the nonsense of FPTP voting that the LibDems are now in 5th place in popular polling, behind Reform and Greens/Cons/Lab, yet are predicted to come second or third in terms of seats, merely because the LibDem vote is concentrated in about 100 out of 650 seats. Thus the LDs get 50-100 seats, despite only getting, nationwide, below 15% of the popular vote.

Look at the state of many of those areas. It is all very well to say that they would be even worse had they not had Labour monopoly control for 50-100 years, but that hardly cuts it.

[“Keir Starmer’s decision to return Gordon Brown & Harriet Harman to frontline politics shows how utterly lost he is. Why?

Because at its root the surge of Reform is a rejection of the Blairite project Brown & Harman embody.

A rejection of mass immigration.

A rejection of porous borders.

A rejection of a politics that only ever speaks for middle-class liberal progressives.

A rejection of “men can be women” woke nonsense.

A rejection of the left-leaning lawyer class Blair empowered.

A rejection of unnecessary hate laws and censorship.

A rejection of universal liberalism.

A rejection of how they view immigration sceptics as “bigots”.

And a rejection of the idea that Britishness is just “diversity”.

And Keir Starmer literally brings back the main characters!

He’s totally lost.

Doesn’t get it at all.

Roll on the next general election.“]

As I blogged nearly 2 years ago, Starmer-stein is the wrong person in the wrong job.

Advanced maskirovka. Some of those shown in the clip are brilliant.

On the one hand, blacks like that are funny, hilarious really; on the other hand, it is at the same time more than alarming that they seem to actually believe that sort of completely ahistorical nonsense.

[“If you don’t reconstruct the culture that provided for excellence, and the senior staff that demonstrate it and reinforce it, then it isn’t just the NHS that will continue to fail.
The topdown imposition of equality shifting to equity and conformity with it as a moral duty, bakes in a culture of low standards and burnout for anyone trying to fix it.
The result is failures in judgement by individuals who cannot even explain why they didn’t act appropriately. Consequences don’t register in a culture that refuses to evaluate the outcomes that matter“]

Quite. Look at the whole “Covid” scamdemic/panicdemic, e.g. the “test and trace” nonsense run by that cretinous Dido Harding woman, and all the rest of what went on in 2020-2022.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dido_Harding

I was not yet born in 1951, but I was 4-5 years old in 1961, and in the south of England, at least, effectively all the people in the Home Counties and beyond, say 99.5%, at least, were white English/British. You never saw a black, or even an Indian, in counties such as Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire, Hampshire, West Sussex, Surrey.

“Aaronovitch“…

That “you-know-who” (actually, half-Jew and half-Irish) has tweeted against me in the past, though several years ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Aaronovitch

Temperate rainforest. There should be a great deal more of it.

Interesting artless video from Siberia

Late music

[Baltic shore]

Alt-Right, Angela Rayner, basic income, Campaign Against AntiSemitism, daily blog, Defence, diary blog, Dr Rahmeh Aladwan, elections, free speech, historical, historical revisionism, Ian Millard, immigration, Jewish lobby in UK, Kemi Badenoch, Labour Friends of Israel, Matt Goodwin, MPs, Party Politics, Russia and Russian relations, society, Sophie Meaden, Starmer, Uncategorized

Diary Blog, 6 May 2026

3 Comments

Morning music

Talking point

Talking point

Tweets seen

Shows how totally out-of-touch Starmer-stein is; his whole cabal of a Cabinet, too.

Translates to a Commons with about 324 Reform UK MPs (2 short of a majority), 87 Cons (very weak official Opposition), 62 Lab, 61 LibDems, 44 Greens, 43 SNP [etc].

Same basic story: Reform triumphant by default (because the voters hate and despise Lab and Con), Labour losing votes to both Reform and Green, and no clear public support for any party (not even Reform).

If Reform form a government (on the above figures, a minority one), it must inevitably fail to do anything effective. That will leave the field open, in the 2030s, to real social nationalism. 100 years on, we’re back!

On the figures above, and in concordance with all other opinion polls of the past few months, Starmer would certainly lose his own seat. As matters stand, it seems that, after the next general election, Labour will not only have lost 349 MPs, leaving them with 62, about one-seventh of their 2024 number, but will be facing the necessity of electing a new leader.

As for Reform, a 28% result would be enough to leave them standing as main party, but that would still mean that over 7 out of every 10 voters would have voted against them. Hard, then, to take really radical policies into law and implementation.

As I predicted some time ago on this blog. Starmer-stein has always been a careerist and moneygrubber. He is not the type to step down. They will have to stamp on his fingers to get him to let go.

In any case, do Labour MPs really think that replacing Starmer-stein with some other clown such as Angela Rayner (of the tattoos, “vapes”, “clubbing”, and binge-drinking…and expenses-blodging…and tax evasion), will help?

I lived in London for many years, on and off. Trying to recall whether I ever heard a good word about Haringey. No, I think not…

Migration invasion. Sex crimes by migrants. Ubiquitous these days. Labour and Conservative parties are equally to blame.

The time may come when Starmer-stein will have to apply for asylum in his beloved Israel. Evil bastard.

See also:

The Tide is Coming In: Reflections on the Possible End of Our Present Civilization and What Might Follow

Wales is about to bin Labour. The rest of the country will go the same way.

[“Revenge— Get down there where you wanted to send me, you unclean spirit!“]

In all my years in London, including a few months actually on the border of Holland Park (area), I never went into the park itself. Pity.

Translates to a Commons with about 316 Reform UK MPs (10 short of a majority), 76 LibDems (extremely weak official Opposition), 71 Greens, 60 Cons, 53 Lab, 45 SNP [etc].

Yet again, the voters not enthused by any party and Starmer losing his own seat. One other point: the ridiculous nature of FPTP voting exposed yet again. The LibDems, who opinion-poll between 10% and 15%, and election-poll lower, are likely to end up with over 70 Commons seats, while parties that always poll higher, both in opinion polls and at real elections, get fewer seats. Unfair, and not even logical.

In fact, that poster EXACTLY fits where the voters now are. They do not really “want” Reform UK, but they DO want RID of Starmer-stein, RID of fake Labour, and RID of a finance-capitalist, Nigerian-led, “Conservative” rump-party bad joke.

I love it when System drones and careerists are upset and/or burst into tears, as when some of the Labour Friends of Israel women MPs lost their Commons seats in 2019. Unfortunately, by mid-2024, most had wormed their way back into Parliament, either at GE 2024, or via Starmer-stein elevating them to the degraded House of Lords.

Unless I have misunderstood the critical tweet, there seems to be confusion between the Odyssey and the Iliad.

In any event, the “agenda” behind most of such film and TV is very obvious, and has been for some time. Not “artistic licence” but the opposite— ideological straitjacket.

See also:

TV Ads and Soaps Are the Propaganda Preferred by the System in the UK

Ah. Just saw a possible explanation. Helen of Troy does, apparently, have a role, but a very minor one, in the Odyssey. Does not excuse the casting of that role in the film, though.

How “innocent” is “innocent”?

Some, such as the malicious perjurers of the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”], are effectively unpaid volunteers (in fact, some of the “CAA” troublemakers and trolls are paid) for the Israeli Embassy in London.

[“Morgan McSweeney is a ‘made man’- nothing will happen to him no matter how many lies he has told.

He worked with Margaret Hodge (Oppenheimer) to defeat the BNP in Barking in 2010.

He fronted Labour Together on behalf of zionist donors like Gary Lubner and Trevor Chinn to defeat Jeremy Corbyn.

His wife was given a safe seat as an MP.

This is what a zionist occupied government looks like.”]

Exactly.

In fact, I blogged quite a while ago about McSweeney and his sinister Israeli connections.

I must have missed that story.

[from many years ago]

…and in the past several years he has amplified that.

Late tweets

I want underwhelming (and pro-Jewish lobby, pro-Israel) Reform UK to do well for a couple of years, smash Lab and Con, get into government, but then fail miserably, and perforce make way for real social national people.

[“France launches one-euro meals for all university students

French university canteens have begun offering one-euro meals to students regardless of income, in a measure designed to address financial hardship. The price, which covers a starter, main course and dessert, was previously only available to those with low incomes or receiving financial aid.“].

In principle, not dissimilar to the “basic income” concept, which I support.

Late music

Alt-Right, animal welfare, by-elections, Campaign Against AntiSemitism, Conservative Friends of Israel, daily blog, Defence, diary blog, elections, free speech, historical, Ian Millard, immigration, Jewish lobby in UK, Laura Towler, Matt Goodwin, MPs, Party Politics, Russia and Russian relations, Sam Melia, society, Tommy Robinson, Uncategorized, wildlife

Diary Blog, 1 March 2026, with thoughts about the Iran conflict, and about UK party politics.

2 Comments

Morning music

[painting by Volegov]

Tweets seen

Little girls at a school bombed by Israel. Another Israeli and American war crime.

At least the Israelis will not be able to harvest their organs this time.

[“The entire tenor of the US administration rn is so shocking. They insult and goad their allies in public, they are roundly self-congratulatory (having bombed children) rude bullies. Given they said we didn’t help them in other mad Middle East forays why on earth are we even speaking to them. Indescribably ghastly. Get off our bases frankly.“]

How utterly stupid so many standard British people sound these days.

What was it that I was constantly hearing on British TV until about a day or two ago, about how safe and nice Dubai is to live in?

In a century’s time, places like Dubai will be ruined and abandoned hulks sticking up out of the desert sands, the only visitors a few camel-borne Arabs.

Quite possibly, Tel Aviv will be similar.

Part-Jew nonentity, Tom Tugendhat MP, wants the UK to deploy its limited resources to help Israel, nothing else. Shut up, you fifth-columnist.

You need to go further. “Whites Only” at elections (both voters and candidates).

On those figures, Starmer himself would lose his seat in Parliament.

That poll translates to a Commons with about 394 Reform MPs (very large majority), 60 LibDems (official, very weak, Opposition), 52 Greens, 45 SNP, 44 Cons, 29 Labour [etc].

I look forward to something like that happening in a couple of years, or 2029, then to a pseudo-national Reform UK government which (in the pocket of the Jew-Zionist/Israel lobby, and unwilling to really tackle the “blacking and browning” of Britain, as well as being pseudo-“libertarian” and finance-capitalist) will be unable to “do de business“, and so will have to give way to real social nationalism.

Dan Hodges and other commentators keep saying that (at 35%, 30%, even 28%), Reform has reached its national electoral ceiling. Maybe so. At 35%, I would probably agree, but that is irrelevant as long as the Labour and Conservative parties are on 16%, 18%, even if they go up to 22% or more.

As for the Greens, so long as they remain below 25% (and at present they cannot even make it to 20 %; at present they are between 12% and 18%), there is no chance of their being able to form a government; they will, however, ensure that Labour cannot form one either.

That one would translate to Reform UK having about 336 MPs (small majority), Greens 88 (official Opposition but weak), Cons 74, LibDems 65, SNP 45, and Lab— 15! [etc].

The opinion polls differ slightly, but all have put Reform at the top, and usually well clear of the pack, for about 18 months now.

I had no idea that Sam Melia had completed the whole of his sentence actually in custody. If so, it must be because he refused to surrender his principles and refused to compromise. Well done.

“Welcome back to the fight; this time I know our side will win” (to coin a phrase…).

“They” don’t change.

Yet the Jews still whine about alleged similar events in Poland and the Ukraine in 1939-1941, where other Jews were, they say, the victims.

A pack of extremely malicious Jews. Several of the leaders of that tiny but (of course) “well-funded” cabal have engaged in attempts to pervert the course of justice, and Falter himself has lied on oath in court more than once, in my opinion.

Trump remains what he was in 2016, when I, still then having a Twitter account (a pack of Jews had me expelled in 2018) described him as “a squawking parrot in a gilded cage, and guarded by a phalanx of Jews“.

I was right. I am right.

Iran will rebuild, and I think will dig ever deeper into those mountains over there, constructing missile factories and launch bases far below ground-level. Certainly conventional, possibly nuclear, missiles. One day, tens of thousands of drones will take to the air, followed by thousands of missiles. Their destination will be Israel, which will then be obliterated.

Regionally, the conflict has already put paid to 99% if not 100% of tourism to Dubai, for example. Who will be going there even if the airport re-opens?

As for oil and gas, it can be sourced from other parts of the world, but at a price. The “cat of the Kremlin” must be contemplating the cream…

Striking yet not sinking? I am not sufficiently informed to know what it takes to sink such a vessel these days.

Google AI says: “Four ballistic missiles can severely damage a large aircraft carrier, potentially disabling its flight deck and combat capabilities, but sinking a modern supercarrier likely requires more hits, according to naval experts. While a few missiles cause major damage, deep, watertight compartments and heavy armor are designed to prevent total sinking“.

So there we are.

That Alex Armstrong character is yet another pseudo-national GB News talking head. Israel, and the JQ generally, is always the touchstone. Anyone supporting the Jewish lobby is at best useless and stupid, at worst an enemy.

Hero.

Laurels and oak leaves.

Contrary to what many believe, homeschooling is completely lawful in the UK: see https://www.gov.uk/home-education.

[“The Blair years (1997–2007) can be read as a “rewiring” of the British state: a huge burst of legislation that expanded state capacity, shifted key powers away from direct electoral control, and built legal frameworks that later governments found hard to unwind. The result, critics argue, is a UK that feels less governable: immigration pressures that look structurally “locked in”, an economy shaped by technocratic monetary policy rather than democratic choices, a voting system perceived as more open to abuse, and a general sense that the country is smothered in rules while basic competence and trust have declined. On immigration, the argument isn’t that Blair “caused” today’s numbers single-handedly, but that he helped build the modern machinery of mass migration management—and also raised expectations and rights around remaining in the UK. The Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 created the modern asylum support framework, including Section 95 support and the dispersal system (moving asylum seekers around the country rather than concentrating in London). In practice, dispersal entrenched a long-running national system of accommodation contracts, local authority impacts, and political flashpoints—so when asylum claims rose later, the infrastructure (and the costs) scaled up rather than disappearing. Later, the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 further reshaped appeals, removals, and the legal pathways around asylum and immigration decisions. A critic’s point is that Blair-era reforms normalised a permanent “immigration management state”—and once you have a large legal-administrative apparatus for it, you rarely get smaller numbers; you get larger budgets, more contractors, more case backlogs, and more political dependency on the system. Blair’s rights framework is also central to this critique. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic UK law, making rights-based challenges easier to bring in UK courts. While defenders say it prevents abuse, critics say it also made removals, detention, and deportation more legally contested and slower—especially once immigration law became heavily litigated. (That criticism is strongest when combined with later case law and later legislation, but the “plumbing” starts in 1998.) On the economy, the standout is the Bank of England Act 1998, which put interest-rate decisions in the hands of the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), i.e., operational independence from ministers. The case for it was credibility and low inflation. The case against it is democratic deficit and distributional pain. When inflation spikes, the MPC tightens policy by raising rates. That hits mortgage holders, renters (via landlords’ costs), and small businesses first. In other words, a technocratic anti-inflation tool produces very real household hardship, and there’s no politician directly accountable for the vote. The government still sets the overall inflation target remit (now CPI 2% in modern practice), but the day-to-day levers are independent. Critics argue that this framework can feel like the public is being “disciplined” for inflation that may have been driven by energy shocks, supply problems, or fiscal choices—yet the blunt instrument is paid for by ordinary borrowers. On democracy and postal voting, critics point to Blair-era changes that encouraged “convenience voting” and widened the surface area for fraud or coercion. The Representation of the People Act 2000 and related reforms helped normalise postal voting expansion (later accelerated by subsequent governments and regulations), shifting voting from supervised polling stations into homes and informal settings. The critical claim isn’t that postal voting is automatically corrupt; it’s that it is easier to pressure family members, harvest ballots, or exploit weak handling practices—especially in tight local contests. The fact that the UK keeps updating postal vote rules and resilience (including recent guidance and reform pushes) is often cited by critics as evidence the system needed “hardening” after expansion. In short: Blair-era reform opened the door; later years had to retrofit controls. Finally, complaints about over-legislation is really about a governing style: Blair’s New Labour embraced “delivery” via targets, regulators, new offences, new agencies, and constant statutory change. The partial architecture to this: Terrorism Act 2000 and RIPA 2000 expanding state surveillance powers; multiple criminal justice reforms; major reorganisations in health, education, local government; and a steady stream of “fixes” that created new compliance burdens. Even when individual laws had plausible aims, critics argue the cumulative effect was a society that is more monitored, more regulated, and less locally self-directed—yet not necessarily more functional. So, the critical “how we got into today’s mess” story goes like this: Blair set up systems that persist. An immigration management and rights framework that makes rapid reduction harder; a monetary regime that can impose severe household pain without direct electoral accountability; a voting approach that prioritised convenience and then had to be patched against abuse; and a legislative habit of constant intervention that expanded the state’s footprint everywhere. Even where later governments made different choices, they mostly did so inside the institutions Blair built—meaning Britain’s problems now feel structural, not just political.“]

Late tweets seen

Goodwin left out a few other necessities, such as “Whites Only voting and/or standing for election” and “Eliminate the influence of the Jewish/Israel lobby, especially on TV, radio, and in the Press.”

Tugendhat is a part-Jew pro-Israel puppet and fifth-columnist. Shut up, Tugendhat.

Our animal friends.

Late music

[painting by Serge Marshennikov; https://thbrennenfineart.com/artist/serge-marshennikov]

Alt-Right, animal welfare, daily blog, Defence, diary blog, elections, environment, free speech, historical, Ian Millard, immigration, Jackson Hinkle, Jewish lobby in UK, Matt Goodwin, MPs, Party Politics, Russia and Russian relations, society, Starmer, The Great Replacement, Uncategorized

Diary Blog, 17 May 2025

8 Comments

Afternoon music

Saturday quiz

This week, the same score as political journalist John Rentoul— 5/10. I knew the answers to questions 2, 3, 5, 8, and 10.

Tweets seen

…and now the Israeli Jews, apparently backed by most Zionist Jews from other parts of the world, are, literally, deliberately starving to death the Arab Palestinians of Gaza, including the children. The same Jew-Zionists who are always whining about the alleged treatment of their ancestors by Germans (and Poles, and Ukrainians, and French etc) during WW2, a conflict which ended 80 years ago.

Interesting.

…thus proving that 64% of the UK population in 2020 were unthinking, panicked, deliberately-stampeded idiots.

Immigration, on the scale seen by the UK for half a century, impacts everything, and every other issue.

Migration invasion. Migration occupation. Utterly disastrous.

Incidentally, only people whose great-grandparents were born in the UK (or in northern Europe, and to properly-European parents) should be entitled to vote in elections here.

Ostalgie

[East Berlin, 1970s]

As blogged in the past, I found my couple of days in the southern part of the DDR (in 1988) quite interesting.

More music

More tweets

Some things go beyond politics. The bond between human and cat passeth all understanding…

More music

[Rembrandt, Man in Armour]

Late tweets seen

Alt-Right, daily blog, diary blog, free speech, Ian Millard, immigration, Labour Friends of Israel, MPs, Nigel Farage, Party Politics, Russia and Russian relations, society, Starmer, The Great Replacement, Uncategorized

Diary Blog, 15 April 2025

5 Comments

Morning music

[painting by Honore Daumier]

Tweets seen

Britain, as it slowly (?) dies…

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woman-smeared-faeces-over-nursery-35056718

[defendant]

“A woman smeared faeces on milk bottles and the walls of a nursery and climbed in clinical waste bins for “comfort”, a court heard. Abbi Taylor must have ‘horrified parents’, said a judge at Newcastle Crown Court.

The 46-year-old, from Newmarket Walk, South Shields, South Tyneside, who the court heard identifies and was referred to by all in court as a woman, has pleaded guilty to three counts of dumping bags of toxic materials – nappies containing human waste – at nurseries in the local area.”

[Daily Mirror]

So not a woman at all, but a crazed “trans person”…

There are quite a number of issues which this country really has to address as a matter of urgency. The “trans” nonsense is but one of them.

If Britain continues to fail to address the urgent problems within society, if it continues to facilitate craziness, then the country will go down in blood and fire eventually.

See also:

When Reality Becomes Subjective

Late tweets seen

Jesus H. Christ! 700 of the bastards! So up to 700 (more) dwelling units now required, 700 loads of medical/dental services, 700 more loads of money given to them every week. Etc.

Voters of Runcorn! It is time for you to make history at the upcoming by-election.

Late music

[Olympic skating rink, Medeo, near Almaty, Kazakhstan. I myself skated there once, in 1996; I was living at the time about 10 miles away (Prospekt Lenina, Almaty)]

elections, ethnostate, historical, Party Politics, prepping, Reminiscences and Musings, Russia and Russian relations, safe zones, society, Uncategorized, white flight

The Way Forward for Social Nationalism in the UK

4 Comments

“The talent of the strategist is to identify the decisive point and to concentrate everything on it, removing forces from secondary fronts and ignoring lesser objectives.”

Those words of Clausewitz are often taken to encapsulate the essence of strategy. How are they applied to the socio-political question in the UK (England, primarily) from the social-national point of view?

“The Decisive Point”

The “decisive point” or objective, ultimately, is the formation of a British ethnostate as an autonomous part of a Eurasian ethnostate based on the Northern European and Russian peoples. However, within the UK itself and before that, the objective must first be drawn less widely, as political power within the UK’s own borders.

The Gaining of Political Power in the UK

The sine qua non of gaining the sort of political power required is the existence of a political party. More than that, a party which is uncompromizing in its wish to entirely reform both State and society.

History is replete with examples of states which have seemed not even just powerful but actually eternal, yet which have collapsed. Ancient Rome, though perhaps not a “state” in our modern sense, is perhaps the one most embedded in the Western consciousness. More recently, the Soviet Union and its satellite states. In between those two examples (but among many others) we might cite the pre-1914 European “settlement” based on the empires and kingdoms which collapsed during and after the First World War: Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, the Ottoman Empire.

The main point to understand is that, in situations of crisis on the large scale, it is not the political party with the most money, erudition, developed policy or even membership that comes out on top, but the party with the most will or determination. That means the most disciplined party under the leadership of the most determined leader.

It is better to have a party consisting of only 1,000 which is tightly-disciplined and self-disciplined than one of 100,000 which is a floundering mass of contradictions. When a national crisis occurs, such as 1917-1921 in Russia or 1929-1933 in Germany (to take two obvious examples), the people instinctively turn to the party perceived to be strongest, not strongest in numbers, money, intellectuality or number of members, but strongest in the will, the will to power.

The Party

A party requires leadership, members, ideology, policy and money. Everything comes from the leadership and the membership, in symbiosis. In practical terms, this means that policy is open to free discussion, up to the point where a decision is made as to what is party policy as such. Also, it has to be understood that a party requires money as a tank or armoured car requires fuel. To have endless fundraising drives, hunts for wealthy donors etc demeans and dispirits the membership. Having a “tithing” system renders such other methods unnecessary. The members sacrifice an agreed amount of their post-tax income, such as 10%. The party organizes itself and its message to the general population using that money.

As a rule of thumb in contemporary Britain, it might be said that, on average, each member will provide something like £2,000 per year to the party. A party of even 1,000 members will therefore have an annual income of £2 million, enough to buy not only propaganda and administration but real property as a base. By way of comparison, the Conservative Party in 2017 has an income of about £3.5 million.

Elections

It must be understood that elections are only one way to power, but they are indispensable in England, for historical-cultural reasons. A party which cannot win elections loses credibility rapidly once that party is large. In the initial phase, no-one expects the party to win Westminster or even local council seats, but after that, it has to win and so grow, or deflate as the BNP did and as UKIP is doing now. The problem small parties have under the English electoral system is that a Westminster seat can be won only with, at a minimum, about 30% (and usually 40% or more) of votes. The insurgent party is in danger of spreading itself too thinly, in every way. UKIP’s history illustrates the point: in 2015, about 12% of votes cast (nearly 4 million), but only the one MP with which they, in effect, started. The answer is to concentrate the vote. That is done by concentrating the members and supporters of the party geographically.

Safe Zones

I have blogged previously about the creation of safe zones and especially one primary safe zone (possibly in the South West of England). If the members and supporters of the party gradually relocate into that zone or zones, many things become easier, from protection of buildings, meetings, exhibitions etc to the election of councillors and MPs. I have also blogged about the magnetic attraction such a safe zone might exercise over people in the UK as a whole.

The Decisive Time

The “decisive time” cannot be predicted. In Russia, Lenin (at the time in foreign exile) thought that the 1905 uprising was “the revolution”. He was wrong. He also thought that the first (February, old-style) 1917 uprising was not “the” revolution. He was wrong again. It was.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_Revolution

Lenin had to hurry back to Russia (arriving belatedly in April 1917, old-style) not only to try to take control (he failed in that and had to foment his own coup d’etat in October 1917) but to avoid being sidelined and so becoming an almost irrelevant footnote to history.

In Germany after 1929, Hitler likewise was not in control of events. In the end, economic near-collapse and political turmoil gave him the chance to win enough votes (33% in 1932) to form a coalition government which led on to full power in 1933, after the NSDAP achieved a higher –though still minority– popular vote (44%).

In other words, both Lenin and Hitler were the pawns of Fate while striving to be the masters of events. They had something in common though: highly-disciplined and ideologically-motivated parties behind them.

Practical Matters

At the age of 60, the last thing which is convenient for me is to form a political party. I have no need of such an activity as a hobby or absorbing interest. I am coming to the idea out of duty, out of a realization that something has to be done and out of an understanding that something can be done, if Fate concurs. I am not willing to compromize on overall ideology or on the way things are organized within such a party. I shall only establish a political party (which may become a movement) if it can be done on a serious basis. However, there is a need for a party to speak for the British people and there is a widening political vacuum in which such a party can thrive and grow.

Update 15 April 2019

In the two years since I wrote the above blog post, my view has not changed, that is

  • a political party and movement is needed;
  • there is at present no such party;
  • such a party can only be established if done on a serious basis;
  • I myself still do not have the means with which to found such a party; but
  • a political party and movement is —still— needed…

Update, 8 March 2023

All factors mentioned in the previous update remain the same.