Morning music
Announcement
According to what I have seen on Twitter/X, the young activist David R. Morgan (@david_r_morgan on Twitter/X) has been arrested by “anti-terror” police after complaints made by the (((usual))) troublemakers.
While I do not agree with everything he posts (manner rather than substance, though, in most cases), to be arrested merely for (as it seems) having posted some satirical cartoons etc would be yet another ludicrous misuse of police “anti-terror” powers in the UK.
Reminiscent of the persecution of satirical singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz and others in previous years.
Hopefully, David Morgan will soon be released, if that has not already happened.
The System and the “usual suspects” have not learned the lesson of the champagne cork— the deeper in the swimming pool you push it down, the more powerful its re-emergence.
Tweets seen
If Britain ever has a real government, it will have to use some islands off the coast as its own, though hopefully less brutal, version of the Solovetsky Islands [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solovetsky_Islands], so numerous are the enemies of our race, culture, and future.
Even that is but the tip of the iceberg. Most minor and some major crimes are never reported to the police, who in any case are often, maybe even usually, uninterested.
I have just finished A View from the Foothills: The Diaries of Chris Mullin, bought a while ago in paperback for about 20p from a supermarket charity shelf, and read slowly, a few pages a day, in the car.
In those diaries (quite interesting, but not as fascinating as the more famous ones of Alan Clark: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Clark#Diaries), Mullin recalls having visited the “anti-social behaviour” police in his own constituency; a pleasant enough group, but spending much if not all of their time in their office, rarely covering the ground where anti-social behaviour was actually happening.
Talking point
Talking point
That is what Jewish-lobby puppet Ian Austin (then MP, now “Lord” Ian Austin) tweeted long ago (now, I believe, deleted, unsurprisingly). Austin was also one of the worst expenses cheats.
A one-time “Labour” MP who accepted his “peerage” from “Boris” Johnson, another Israel-lobby puppet. A contrived “honour” which allows him to continue to receive money, both directly and indirectly.
For the sake of transparency, I should add that, in or about 2019, Austin also actually wrote to the then Director of Public Prosecutions on behalf of the malicious and tiny, though (((very well-funded))), “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”] demanding that I be prosecuted for allegedly “antisemitic” tweets (I had a Twitter account until 2018).
An evil individual.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Austin
More tweets seen
Yes. Sadly.
Starmer is both overtly and covertly supported by Israel and its agents.
I have just watched part of a Sky News interview; Starmer interviewed by Beth Rigby.
Starmer was utterly pathetic as he was asked to define the “working people” his government and Rachel Reeves’ budget was intended to help. He said “in my mind’s eye” about 5 times even in the few minutes while I was watching and listening.
Starmer does not know what he is doing. A person both nasty and pathetic, as well as totally out of his depth.
More music
More tweets
Sometime about a decade ago, some newspaper or magazine referred to me as “the pro-Russian barrister Ian Millard“, but that, I thought, was far too broad to be libellous (it might have been said, to give just one example, merely to refer to my being interested in pre-revolutionary Russian literature, or Russian and Soviet orchestral and other music, which in fact do both apply to me).
I never seriously considered suing in defamation. In any event, I doubt whether such a suit could ever be successful, for a number of reasons. In fact, I took so little interest in the matter that I have forgotten where I saw the comment about me. I was looking for it recently, but had no success.
There is no “Labour plan” (to stop the invasion).
“Elon Musk has been regularly communicating with Putin since late 2022, – WSJ
According to the publication, they discuss “personal topics, business and geopolitical tensions.”
The US government is allegedly aware of this, but keeps the talks secret. It is reported that in the fall of 2022, political scientist Ian Bremmer said that Musk told him about his conversation with Putin and the Kremlin’s “red lines.” Another example cited is that in late 2023, the Kremlin asked Musk not to turn on Starlink over Taiwan – as a “favor” to Xi Jinping.
“Musk’s secret talks may confirm Trump’s desire to conclude a large-scale deal with Russia, including on Ukraine,” the article says.”
“The legacy press“…I wonder who (((they))) might be?…
…and (((which group))) is behind the “Controllers”? Yes. “Them”…
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
The blame for the ridiculous prison policy has to be laid at Starmer’s feet, he is the one who ordered the police and the judges to get the protestors locked up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qPJLRvcSAk
LikeLike
Labour release REAL criminals from prison some of whom have committed serious offences and therefore could pose a threat to public safety and then use that prision capacity instead to lock-up mean Tweeters ect. It is disgusting and offensive that we have political prisioners just like despotic and totalitarian dictatorships like North Korea have.
Still, it was Mrs Thatcher who set this country down this absurd path with her Public Order Act 1986.
LikeLike
To Labour, people living off investment income eg lottery millionaires are non-working. Yes, that would be correct but so what! If those people have money invested in the shares of British companies they have every right to derive income from their investments and they are helping the British economy even though they are not formally working.
Labour and the Tories as well make a fetish out of so-called ‘working people’. They need to remember that people can contribute to the economy and society still despite their not being in a job. If this country ever gets ahead of the world in adopting artificial intelligence with its lesser need for ‘workers’ will we still see Labour and Tories droning on and on about ‘working people’?
LikeLike
John:
…and it seems that the “new” Labour Friends of Israel misgovernment regards those who, in many cases, have worked for 20, 30, 40, even 50 years without interruption and who are now retired, as unworthy to be called “working people”, or “working families” or whatever the latest bs-terminology might be.
LikeLike
The only real way forward for Israel is to peacefully dismantle the Zionist supremacist and expansionist state and to become an independent Palestinian state where Palestinians and Jews can live alongside one another peacefully as they used to do before Zionism created the state in 1948.
That is what would have been the situation now if Zionist extremists in the USA with their influence in Congress had not interfered and let we British end our mandate in the appropriate way.
LikeLike
John:
You are more of an idealist than I had supposed! In what world could the Israeli state be “peacefully” dismantled?!
LikeLike
If the leadership of the Israeli state realised that true peace for everyone including Israeli Jews is unobtainable without justice ect for Palestinians but, of course, that will never happen with Benjamin Netenhayhu. Zionism is basically the Jewish version of German National Socialism and therefore inherently dismissive of the rights of others, expansionist, dominering and violent.
LikeLike
In other news, out of touch, political hasbeen, George Gideon Oliver Osbourne, has announced he will be voting for Kemi Badenoch to be leader of the fake Conservative Party. His reasoning? Jenrick wants to pull Britain out of the European Convention of Human Rights and she doesn’t. George reckons it is important we stay in it as we supposedly need to keep being a part of international alliances ect and British lawyers drew the rubbish up in the 1950’s.
With him being a failed globalist Chancellor of the Exchequer at the time of the EU referendum, no wonder the vote was lost! With his ridiculous ranting that the British economy would collapse and his unlikeability by most people as a person and politician he must have been worth a few percentage points to the anti-EU side all by himself.
If Tory members pick Badenoch over Jenrick, the party will live to regret it. Whilst both candidates are distinctly underwhelming and not much liked by the public, she is the worse of the two. She is overly argumentative and is a loose cannon. When you only have 121 seats in parliament, you can not afford such a person to be at the helm.
LikeLike
John:
My view is that the public now despise both main System parties, but hate Labour more because 1. it is in power and 2. it has already let down 90% of the people. The Con Party is an irrelevance, certainly until 2029 (assuming Britain is still in one piece by then). Anyway, where is the “big picture show” for the Cons to display? Macmillan’s “you never had it so good”, Heath’s appeal to the aspirational, Thatcher’s vow to turbocharge the private sector, oppose Soviet socialism, and so on? They have no “big story” to tell.
LikeLike
Indeed. The Conservative Party under Osbourne and that other decidedly out of touch, non political genius, David Cameron, systematically threw overboard any pretence, let alone reality, of the party being socially conservative and therefore removed the incentive for some to vote Tory instead of Lib Dem or abstain. Reform UK have partially filled the political space left behind like the Afd in Germany have with regard to Merkel’s move of the CDU to the ‘centreground’.
LikeLike