Diary Blog, 28 November 2024, including Russia, Ukraine, and the UK migration invasion

Afternoon music

[Johann Messely, The Terrace]

Tweets seen

Rutte: Ukrainians do not want negotiations because they are at a disadvantage

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said that he does not consider it a wise decision to involve the Alliance’s troops in the conflict on the territory of Ukraine. ” I don’t think it would be a wise decision ,” he said when asked by the host of “Fox News” whether NATO is considering deploying troops if third countries continue to allegedly support Russia in the conflict.

According to Rute, Ukraine will start peace negotiations only when it feels that it can get something.

Hopefully, NATO (and the EU) will now row back from the brink of war with Russia.

Is that a kind of double bluff, and is Iran already well on the way? I should not be surprised. Israel is doomed either way.

The Golani Brigade is considered to be one of the most effective, and toughest, parts of the Israeli land forces: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golani_Brigade.

Unusual weapon

https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/24752698.man-threatened-person-baby-formula-stealing-co-op/

A man threatened a person with a tin of baby formula after stealing alcohol and steaks from a Co-op.

[Bournemouth Echo]

Late tweets seen

In 2018 Louise Haigh, then shadow police minister, lamented govt’s fraud cuts. “Why is the government starving the police of the resources they need to keep our communities safe?” It might have shed a different light if she’d also admitted she’d been convicted of fraud a few years earlier….. Today, four years after telling Keir Starmer, she admits it publicly after being approached by The Times. Full story from @Steven_Swinford and me.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14138119/Transport-Secretary-Louise-Haigh-admits-LYING-police-claiming-phone-stolen.html.

Not only a fraud, but a stupid one. Now the stupid woman is (posing as) a Cabinet minister. Britain in 2024.

He has a point…

Incidentally that “General Election Now” petition is still running, and currently not much below 3M signatures. Will change nothing, of course, except that it does underline the basic and increasing unpopularity of Starmer-Labour, for which only 4 out of 20 eligible voters voted:

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/700143

The doctor was cleared of any charges. They basically always are in the Netherlands, no matter how badly they abuse the law. About 40% of euthanasia victims there did not consent to euthanasia. In 2001 a doctor was even found guilty of murder and still faced no punishment at all. https://theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/25/doctor-netherlands-asked-family-hold-down-euthanasia-patient.”

I once met a Dutch doctor, in the course of my professional work as a barrister. He was making (17 years ago) about £650 a day, 6-7 days a week, so about £20,000 a month, as a locum doctor in the NHS. It may not have any statistical validity, but the experience of meeting that horrible bastard told me everything I need to know about the Dutch medical profession.

Israel is the centre of a worldwide web. It has to go, and the worldwide web with it.

[“Get down there, where you wanted to send me, you unclean spirit!“]

Late thoughts about the migration invasion of the UK

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14137409/Keir-Starmer-immigration-net-peak-record-Labour.html

Keir Starmer admitted he must bring down immigration today after shock figures showed the annual record has been smashed again.

The PM insisted Britain can no longer be a ‘soft touch’ after huge revisions to official data showed net inflows were 906,000 in the year to June 2023.

Arrivals in the 12 months to June this year were 728,000 higher than those leaving the country. In itself that was almost as much as the previous long-term immigration record.

[Daily Mail]

As so-called “far right” people have been saying for years, while being called “alarmists” and “conspiracy theorists” who “stir up” hostility to the invaders, and “invent” statistics. Not so. The ones making up fake statistics are the System politicians and bureaucrats: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14137473/The-assumption-led-staggering-underestimate-migration-UK.html.

I caught a few minutes of a BBC News “discussion”. One silly woman was talking about how most asylum-seekers are “genuine”, then gave “Ukraine” as an example. The fact is that most of Ukraine is no more a a war zone than was Northern Ireland or even mainland Britain in the 1970s. An occasional bomb. I am talking about, especially, Western Ukraine and Kiev.

As the rules now stand, literally hundreds of millions of people in the world could, in principle, arrive here and make a successful claim for asylum. Fact. Can you imagine what the UK would be like if they all came here? Impossible? As recently as a decade ago, pro-migrant drones were saying that a million a year could never happen. Now look.

Meanwhile some BBC drone was saying that migration is essential for “the NHS and the care sector”. Only because of the way our society has structured itself in recent decades.

Also, migration at a million a year— how many doctors, nurses, and care workers out of every million? The fact is that the whole NHS is only about 1.5M, and about half are white British people.

The care sector employs a similar number of people.

Ergo, most “migrants” (invaders), the vast vast majority, are not working either in the NHS or the care sector. More lying propaganda from the BBC.

Where is our society going? It becomes ever more obvious…

Late music

17 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 28 November 2024, including Russia, Ukraine, and the UK migration invasion”

  1. Re that tweet about the Golani Brigade! Oh dear, what a shame! S#@÷ happens as the saying goes! Now, if the Zionist state just dissolved itself and became an independent Palestine then those Zionist Jewish servicemen could be still with us and Jews and Palestinians could live together in peace and harmony as they used to do before the ultra-nationalist, dominering, expansionist philosophy of Zionism created the state in 1948.

    Also, the Zionist entity would cease to be ‘A Vatican’ for Zionists worldwide.

    What is not to like? At any rate, real, devoutly religious, Ultra-Orthodox Jews say that Jews are supposed to remain in a divinely decreed exile and therefore are not supposed to establish a Jewish sovereignty/state:

    https://twitter.com/TorahJudaism

    To put it simply, the Zionist state is not Kosher!

    Like

    1. Yes, John. But those ultra Orthodox Jews who believe that are very small in number, and they still hate you and want you enslaved. They just want their Moshiach to come and usher in the time of Tikkun Olam, where the goy will be the slaves of the Jews.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I don’t know. They may dislike me but probably nowhere near as much as the Zionist loony lot do. As far as I can see the Ultra-orthodox ‘Black Hat Brigade’ posse basically want to be left alone and if you don’t cause trouble for them they will not do it against you. They are devoutly religious people (probably the most religious people in the UK) and therefore pretty insular as a community. In some ways, they are like those Amish people in the USA and in particular the state of Pennsylvania quite a few of whom voted for Trump.

        As far as troublemaking by Jews is concerned it is normally the barely religious ‘Reform’ or atheist Jews who are to blame.

        The National Front had an Ultra-Orthodox Jew in its ranks.

        Like

  2. It is a bit rich of the Daily Telegraph to have that sarcastic though of course perfectly true Matt cartoon. Nowadays, the SAME could be said of a candidate from the so-called Conservative Party which only wants to conserve two things which are the wealth of the top 10% and really the top 5% of people in society and our archaic, deeply unfair and thus profoundly undemocratic, stand alone, ‘pure’ First Past The Post electoral system. How convenient!

    The last time the Conservative Party took the subject of mass immigration or ‘asylum seeking’ remotely seriously was when Mrs Thatcher was PM. That was the most recent period when immigration was kept under some form of real control.

    Like

    1. John:
      In the 1970s, mass immigration was a tiny fraction of what it now is. e.g. the Kenyan and Ugandan Asians…less than 100,000 in all. It was something most ppl did not want, but its immediate impact on society was small. By the 1990s, then 2000s, immigration was already badly impacting society, but the numbers, though large (100,000 a year or so) were a very negative aspect yet not an existential problem in the short term. Now the situation is completely changed. Nearly 800,000, even net, in 2023.

      500,000 to a million, net, annually. If you take away the 100,000-200,000 Brits leaving for Australasia or elsewhere, and the 100,000-200,000 non-whites going home each year, you are left with (in 2023 alone), nearly 800,000 increase in population (net), but also with a population *change* (from white to non-white) of something nearer to a million. Every single year. The society cannot bear that burden. It *will* fall apart; the only question is when.

      If I am still capable physically by that time (being 68 now), I shall adopt the battle-cry of Blucher in 1815: “no prisoners!”

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Intentionally planned genocide is what it is called and it is possible the UN would define it as such. It calls for the highest punishment for its perpetrators ie either the death penalty or a 99 year prison sentence which is the maximum time period one can be incarcerated for in the state of Alaska.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_USA

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment

        https://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_imprisionment_in_the_United_States

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_prison_sentences_served

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Ligon

        Like

      2. The ‘politics of national suicide’ as these nation wrecking policies represent must come to a definitive end. Vote Reform UK or for something stronger. The Germans are lucky to have a party like the Alternative Fur Deutschland (AfD). I wish we had an AfB (Alternative For Britain).

        Like

      3. John:
        I am wondering whether the ultimate result of the invasion *can* be prevented, looking at the state of play politically, and how, even now, most people are determined to pretend that everything is at least “almost” normal.

        Like

  3. How obscene and repugnant actually to compare Ukrainian asylum seekers who, at least those from the more Eastern parts of that country, have a case of some sort to claim asylum to the majority of outright chancers/economic migrants from Africa and elsewhere.

    Still, we are talking about the terminally anti-British BBC here so this kind of obscenity is par for the course.

    Like

    1. John:
      The Ukrainians from the extreme east/southeast of Ukraine impacted by the war *have* a place to go to— Western Ukraine, or Kiev.

      Obviously, they are at least European, but they tend to be arrogant types who are just using the misplaced kindness of the British people. Anyway, the ones who get to the UK are mostly the more affluent ones.

      Like

      1. I wouldn’t say it is entirely misplaced. For that group of asylum seekers I have a measure of sympathy but obviously I have none at all for 99% of ‘asylum seekers’ who are mostly complete fraudsters.

        ‘Asylum’ has been used by successive British governments as a more PC and explainable method of facilitating mass immigration ie by the back door instead of the front door. I have no trust whatsoever in the British government with regard to this vital issue.

        Like

      2. John:
        Everywhere I look on the mass media, eg TV discussions, news broadcasts etc, the migration invasion is being treated as if the question were an intellectual football, or ping pong, suitable for the Oxford Union or some other talking shop, as in “this House believes that 50 million migrants can easily be settled in the UK”.

        No, it is *not* a debate any more. In fact, it scarcely matters what pro-migration or anti-migration partisans *say*. The *events* themselves are starting to hit Britain like a tsunami.

        British society is already being impacted hugely: housing, roads, rail, NHS, schools, crime. If the trajectory continues, and the migrant-invaders breed, even by 2034 Britain might have another 15M people, and growing. When I was at school 50 years ago, there were about 56M in the UK. Now, at least 65M, possibly 70M. By the 2030s, it could be 90M. No society can survive an invasion of that magnitude.

        A social/cultural/racial civil war is looming in the near/mid term future.

        Like

  4. That rather sarcastic photo of Angela Merkel is spot-on. Germany has not been ‘enriched’ by her tsunami of ‘asylum seekers’. Quite the opposite infact. Before the flood, Germany only rarely had gang rapes and stabbings of people on trains, in the street and of police officers. Now, they have become quite common.

    Like

  5. “The PM insisted Britain can no longer be a ‘soft touch’ after huge revisions to official data showed net inflows were 906,000 in the year to June 2023.”

    So June 2022-June 2023, when (((Johnson))) and Sunak were in power.

    A million immigrants in just one year. And that’s assuming the official data is honest (which is doubtful). The real number is probably much higher. And then there are all the “students” and “tourists” who arrive on temporary visas and never leave.

    It’s obvious that the (((REDACTEDS))) are flooding White countries with diversity as fast as possible, with the goal of turning White people into a minority everywhere before enough Whites wake up and elect a Hitler type leader who will stop the (((REDACTEDS))) from destroying the West.

    With regard to Starmer’s announcement, it is undoubtedly designed to lull the British public back to sleep. Don’t worry about immigration everyone! Keir says he will get it under control. Keir says he will fix everything! Just go back to sleep everyone!

    Meanwhile the violent diversity floods into Britain at an ever higher and faster rate.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. The reply button is missing from some of the posts. This comment is a reply to Ian’s post above.

    “I am wondering whether the ultimate result of the invasion *can* be prevented, looking at the state of play politically, and how, even now, most people are determined to pretend that everything is at least “almost” normal.”

    It can be prevented if a Pro-White government is elected in time, before White people become a minority.

    White people ARE starting to wake up, as shown by the 4.1 million people who voted for Reform. Of course, Reform is only mildly patriotic, but the fact that so many voters rejected the Traitor Tories and voted for Reform shows that people ARE aware that the establishment parties are traitors, and are looking for an alternative.

    And then there are the enormous number of Britons who simply didn’t vote. An unknown percentage of them (perhaps more than we think) are White racially aware patriots who are unwilling to vote for traitor parties.

    The long-slumbering British people are beginning to awake.

    The question is whether enough Britons will awake in time.

    The (((REDACTEDS))) are racing to complete the demographic replacement as fast as (((they))) can, before enough White people wake up and elect a Pro-White leader.

    That is why it is absolutely vital for all White patriots to relentlessly awaken as many White people as possible, and relentlessly move the Overton Window in the Pro-White direction.

    With regard to the diversity already in Britain, the (((REDACTEDS))) and (((their))) treasonous underlings think that (((they))) have achieved a fait accompli which cannot be reversed.

    (((They))) are mistaken.

    Throughout history, there are countless instances of mass population transfers, either “voluntary” or otherwise.

    We can even learn from our enemies.

    After WW2, the Czechs and Poles expelled millions of Germans.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_(1944–1950)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_of_Germans_from_Czechoslovakia#:~:text=During%20the%20German%20occupation%20of,the%20Allies%20for%20this%20proposal.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_from_Poland_during_and_after_World_War_II
    And in the USSR, Stalin deported entire ethnic groups to various places around the USSR because he didn’t like them, or he suspected them of wanting to rebel, or because he was simply bored.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_transfer_in_the_Soviet_Union
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deportation_of_the_Chechens_and_Ingush
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deportation_of_the_Crimean_Tatars
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_deportations_from_Lithuania
    There is even an entire Wikipedia category of articles on forced migration with the USSR:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Forced_migration_in_the_Soviet_Union
    If the Czechs and Poles and Soviets could achieve mass population transfers with primitive 1940s technology, think of what could be done today.

    It could easily be done, once the (((disease))) which has destroyed the confidence of the British people is addressed.

    Once the British people are freed from the demoralizing and spirit-destroying influence of the (((REDACTEDS))), the problem can be resolved.

    I won’t go into too much detail in case Keir Stalin’s wannabe NKVD is watching, but suffice it to say that after a Pro-White government is in power, most of the hostile diversity will leave voluntarily because Britain will no longer be a hospitable environment for them.

    A Pro-White government will also have the power to revoke the citizenship of those deemed to be hostile/undesirable, and deport them.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. No Pro-White movement will ever come to power because the (((System))) is rigged to prevent such a thing. Supposing a great, charismatic leader appears and attracts large numbers of followers he will be either killed or arrested and his movement banned. Having said that, would the situation become so bad (as it will be) perhaps his followers will resort to violence and the cowardly majority will eventualy join them (as it usually has happened throughout history) leading to the collapse of the anti-White regime.

      Like

Leave a comment