Talking point
William, Harry, and Meghan Mulatta
I just saw something I wrote about 3 or 4 years ago (not on the blog). Around 2022.
I think that it has held up rather well:
“Looks like I was far too kind (as usual) in describing William and Harry simply as “the tame thick princelings” a few years ago…
The Royal Mulatta is a ruthless manipulator and adventuress. Harry is, in the vernacular, a “fuck-up”. He has not [as some newspaper scribbler claimed] “risen from” anywhere. His one and only distinction, and ticket to fame and fortune, is his birth. He has nothing else.“
“The Harry Formerly Known as Prince”…
Talking point
The above photo shows a Roma Gypsy district in Romania.
Comment unnecessary…
Tweets seen
As I predicted during the “Covid” scamdemic/panicdemic, Britain’s toytown police state, which had been developing slowly, embryonically, since the days of Blair, which grew (largely unnoticed) during the days of Cameron-Levita and Theresa May, and which hatched out during the “Covid” years of 2020-2022, has now started to behave like a real East German (DDR)-style police state.
When it comes to free speech, freedom of expression, even political freedom as formerly understood in this country, the police are now running out of control. This has been developing over about 25 years.
I happened, unusually, to be watching, this morning, I think on Sky, a political show hosted by Trevor Phillips. There was a panel of three scribblers/talking heads, and guests one by one, of which one was Yvette Cooper, Home Secretary (also, former expenses cheat, would-be dictator, moneygrubber, and member of Labour Friends of Israel).
Yvette Cooper did not even try to answer the concerns of the presenter about freedom, civil rights, “democracy” etc, just gave out a bland robotic, scripted response, in the old Blair-Brown way she learned back then (when not defrauding public funds).
In fact, the same was true when Yvette Cooper was asked about the Labour government of Starmer-stein and Rachel Reeves cutting off the benefit income of the sick, disabled etc. No real answer.
I hope that at least some of the voters of Runcorn and Helsby were watching. The by-election is set for 1 May 2025, the same date as the local elections. Voters, you know what to do. You have to vote Reform, even if you dislike Reform, or Farage, or the Reform candidate. Why? Because only a stunning win for Reform will send a message to the main System parties.
Only a dummy would vote fake Labour now. Even the “Con” governments of 2010-2024 did not go as far as the “Labour” (Friends of Israel) government is going, attacking people they think cannot hit back.
Of course, it would be stupid (especially at that upcoming by-election) to vote fake “Conservative” either. Not only because the Cons have no chance of winning at Runcorn and Helsby (only 16% in 2024) but because voting Reform increases the already-good chance of Labour losing.
Incidentally, unpleasant Helen Whately, the Shadow DWP Secretary, said in the Commons very recently that Labour’s callous and cruel attack on the sick and disabled did not go far enough! Surely the Conservative Party must be totally washed-up now.
Also incidentally, the panel on that show were all unimpressive, with one (Guto Harri) looking scruffy and unwashed.
More tweets seen
When the electoral system is largely rigged, when the “elected” government (in the case of Labour, “elected” by only about 20% of all eligible voters, and by only 34% of all actual voters) ignores the popular will and popular desperation, when the government throws money at foreign dictatorships (eg Ukraine) and migrant-invaders while beggaring most British people, and when the mainstream media carries only lies and government propaganda, the whole system is likely to fail and to fall, but a new order will only be established via real struggle.
Wake up. That bitch was always on the dark side. Labour Friends of Israel, an expenses cheat, a buy-to-let parasite, and a fraudster. A would-be dictator.
So what should be done about the cabal of tyrants currently posing as a legitimate government?
Once you realize that most System MPs are enemies of the British people and their future, you see it all much more clearly.
Talking point
What a difference 90 years makes…
More tweets
Talking point
I have found that to be the case. I am smiling with pleasure as I contemplate how many of those enemies have either “snuffed it” or are presently awaiting the same (via natural causes, in most cases).
We all go “up the chimney” sooner or later, but I still prefer my enemies to go up sooner…
More tweets
Russian forces continue to advance across all relevant sectors of the front.
From the horse’s mouth. If 2024 Conservative voters at Runcorn and Helsby want to stick it to Labour and Starmer-stein, then the only way to do that is to vote Reform. This could be the most important by-election of the decade.
In that by-election, a Con vote is a completely wasted vote, so either vote Reform, or stay home. Likewise, if 2024 Labour voters want to send a message to the present fake Labour-label regime under Starmer, Rachel Reeves, Yvette Cooper, and Liz Kendall, then the only way to do that is to vote Reform or, failing that, to stay home.
Ian Robert Millard 
In this beautiful Spring weather you might be walking around your neighbourhood admiring the blossom on the trees, or the lambs in the fields. However, if you notice other changes in the neighbourhood it might be time to sell up and get out ASAP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8e6HGRpNPk
LikeLike
That is my MP. He had a majority of 29,000 in 2019 and now has one of 5,900. We do not see him much in this constituency (so much for the Tories’ beloved undemocratic First Past The Post and its allegedly all important ‘constituency link’) which is just as well on account of the rubbish he speaks there. It is not just private enterprise that creates jobs but government working with private firms and having strong public services like education. How does he think Japan rose from being a bomb shattered wreck in 1945 to being an economic superpower by the 1960’s/1970’s?
LikeLike
Yes, Yvette Cooper does not care less about two tier policing but neither do the so-called Conservatives either. After all, it was Mrs Thatcher that first started the now blatant politicisation
LikeLike
of the police in 1986 with her infamous Public Order Act 1986. This planted the seeds of the PC cult in the police and every government since has added to this culture.
LikeLike
Well, apparently, at least some disabled people have learnt their lesson. According to recent polling on Leftie Stats Labour support amongst them has plunged 16% and now stands at 20% which is 9% behind Reform UK at 29%.
Supposedly, the constituency of Runcorn and Helmsby has quite a large number of people claiming Personal Independence Payment (PIP) which is a vital lifeline to many and in this wretched, unelected ‘government’s’ targets for slashing. If they want to stick it to Labour then they know what to do.
LikeLike
Indeed, Alex Burghart. Runcorn voted Labour quite heavily even in 1983. Therefore, as you tacitly concede, there is no point in the voters there voting fake Conservative. The by-election is between Labour and Reform UK.
LikeLike
The BUF building in your picture must be in East London somewhere. Sir Oswald Mosley’s party had its headquarters in the King’s Road, Chelsea if I recall correctly. Although I have not walked down that street for a few years I would like to think it does not look like that.
LikeLike
Hello everyone: Regarding the quote of Sun-Tzu about “wait and see” I remember two good sayings. I do not know the origin of the first but it reads: “Revenge is a dish best served cold”. The second is Arabic and has been incorporated into the Spanish language: “Sitting by the door of my house I wait to see the corpse of my enemy passing by” (I hope my translation makes sense)
LikeLike
Do not ask me why or how I found this article from 1935 but it is very interesting and confirms my opinion that Sir Oswald Mosley made a big mistake by adopting the Italian fascist uniform. If there was something repulsive to the majority of the Britons in those days it was the adoption of foreign manners and/or slogans, particularly if they resembled “totalitarian” regimes to whom the average Briton was taught to hate by the already alien and anti-British (((press))).
Another thing that was deeply rooted in the English popular psyche was the fear/contempt for “militarism”. This stemmed from the “Glorious Revolution” of 1688 that declared that a permanent army was a threat to “British liberties”. To make sure the King would never challenge the power of Parliament, the recruitment and training of the army was (and has always been) in the hands of the government/Parliament; that is why there is a “Royal Air Force” and a “Royal Navy” but not a “Royal Army”.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jan/19/oswald-mosley-blackshirts-uniform-1935
LikeLike
Claudius:
You probably already know this, but it remains the case that British *officers* do not, in most circumstances, wear their uniform when off-duty and in a civilian setting (eg on the Underground in London, or attending a private reception, or cocktail party).
It does not necessarily apply to “other ranks”, though most do go on leave in civilian clothes these days. Not in the past, though. When I was a small child, aged maybe 7 or 8, c. 1963, I remember young soldiers in uniform by the side of roads sometimes, trying to get lifts in cars. People stopped almost automatically. My mother stopped a few times, which she certainly would not have done were the hitch-hikers not in uniform. They were always grateful for the ride, and would politely thank my mother when they were dropped off a few miles further on.
LikeLike
Thank you very much for that information. Yes, I have noticed that great difference between the British officers and their German, French or Russian counterparts. The former almost avoid as much as possible to be seen in public wearing a uniform whereas the latter would not dream to go out in civilian clothes.
Field Marshal Alexander, who knew something about soldiering, said in one ocassion that the Germans and Russians were natural-born soldiers but not so the British who, in general, do not find military life attractive or glamorous. However, (and I agree with him) once a Briton becomes a soldier he turns out to be an excellent one.
LikeLike
Claudius:
and, as I am sure you will know, the British have only rarely compelled people to serve in the armed forces: press-gangs for the Navy (but that was only in the 18th/early 19thC and only in ports, where drinkers in pubs were mostly seamen, fishermen etc, i.e. people who knew how to sail); and conscription in the army and other arms in WW1 (from 1916 to end of 1918) and then during WW2, and from late 1940s to 1960 (National Service for young men 18+).
Contrast that to Germany and Russia, which have for much of their history had forms of compulsory military service, though not always universal.
LikeLike
Soppy liberalism has been a problem in this country for a very long time eg there were plenty of reasons why Britain should have had mandatory national service from the late 1800’s onwards and certainly by the early part of the last century. For one reason we could have made Continental powers more wary of engaging in actions likely to bring about conflicts in which we would take part.
The Liberal government pre WW1 didn’t like the idea of compulsory national service for rather silly libertarian/liberal reasons of not using compulsion on the part of the state and for thinking that voluntary armed forces are always better. Sometimes, a country needs to use compulsory measures to enlist its young men into its armed forces.
LikeLike
John:
Britain’s power before WW1 and even WW2 relied more on the Royal Navy, patrolling the Imperial sea routes.
Conscription was never thought necessary before 1916, partly because Britain saw itself as a global imperial and maritime power, the Mother of the Seas, not as a European land power.
LikeLike
Germany abolished national service only as recently as a decade ago. The AfD party wants to restore it. Austria still has it. There, one can serve in the military or an alternative civilian service.
LikeLike