Tag Archives: BUF

Diary Blog, 11 July 2021, including thoughts about life, death and killing

An interesting read

An interesting read from 1991: the Anthroposophical magazine The Golden Blade. https://www.waldorflibrary.org/images/stories/Journal_Articles/Golden_Blade_1991.pdf.

On the one hand, this will be the temptation of Americanism, which threatens ‘ gradually to tum Eastem Europe into a virginal appendage of the economically developed and politically advanced Westem countries and also to inundate it on a huge scale with all the ‘achievements’ and ‘fruits’ of super-materialism. On the other hand, as its counterpart, the temptation which arises out of a rejection and fear of this mighty and unconquerable wave of Westem materialism to return to one or another of the forms of the traditional spiritual past.

Although Americanism will be able in a comparatively short time to satisfy the more ‘earthly’ demands of the East European, in so far as these have been virtually unsatisfied during the past seventy-two years, it will, as a result of its anti-spiritual nature, be unable to offer him any kind of spiritual ideals or evolutionary perspectives, apart from that of achieving universal material well-being
.” [from The Golden Blade, 1991]

[The Goetheanum, Dornach, near Basel, Switzerland; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goetheanum]

Musing on life, death, and on the nature of killing as sin

Most religions forbid the taking of life. In Christianity and Judaism, the Ten Commandments given to Moses cover the issue, while in Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism (etc), similar basic prohibition is outlined.

In the most ancient of the still-existing major world religions, Hinduism, killing is seen as wrong but, in some cases, also right. For example, on the field of Kurukshetra, when Arjuna loses heart at the thought of fighting and killing his relatives on the other side, Krishna puts steel into him by indicating that it is Arjuna’s destiny to kill on the battlefield, in the cause of the right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arjuna#Bhagavat_Gita.

“When the war was declared and the two armies were facing each other, Arjuna realized that he would have to kill his dear granduncle (Bhishma), on whose lap he had played as a child and his respected teacher (Drona), who had held his hand and taught him how to hold the bow and arrow, making him the greatest archer in the world. Arjuna felt weak and sickened at the prospect of killing his entire family, including his 100 cousins and friends such as Ashwatthama. Despondent and confused about what is right and what is wrong, Arjuna turned to Krishna for divine advice and teachings. Krishna, who Arjuna chose as his charioteer, advised him of his duty. This conversation forms the Bhagavad Gita, one of the most respected religious and philosophical texts in the Hindu religion. Krishna instructs Arjuna not to yield to degrading impotence and to fight his kin, for that was the only way to righteousness. He also reminded him that this was a war between righteousness and unrighteousness (dharma and adharma) and it was Arjuna’s duty to slay anyone who supported the cause of unrighteousness, or sin. Krishna then revealed his divine form and explained that he is born on earth in each eon when evil raises its head.” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurukshetra_War#The_Bhagavad_Gita].

In fact, we see that the anti-killing prohibition is taken as literal prohibition by very few in our society. The “Thou shalt not kill” injunction in the Ten Commandments is kept to, most of the time, by most humans, as far as killing humans is concerned, but the same people (most of them) think nothing of, say, buying and consuming animal flesh, or fish. Or shooting pheasant. Where do we draw the line? Shellfish? Oysters? What about plants? They are also killed. Is pain and suffering, if any, the deciding factor? How literal must we be?

In India, there is a sect called the Jains, who even wear fine net over their mouths in case they inadvertently swallow small insects as they, the Jains, go about their day.

In Christianity, at first in Roman Catholicism, the notion of the “just war” was developed. If I am not in error, the thinkers behind this were St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Dominic.

That idea, of the “just war”, is deeply ingrained in human religion and in human history. Look at, for example, the Second World War. The psychological convenience of both the West (UK/USA, mainly) and the East (Russia) demands that the war against the German Reich be regarded as an “OK” war, a “just” war, and so a justifiable war. How else can the death, pain, and suffering be —conveniently— exculpated?

Germany suffered at least ten times the number of deaths (perhaps as many as 800,000) by bombing as did the UK (c.60,000), and the USA was not bombed at all. That disproportion, and other things, are considered “OK” because the war was, and still is, labelled as a “just war”, a designation encouraged by the Jew-Zionist element via endless films, books etc.

[Dresden in 1945. British planes bombed Dresden and caused a firestorm; in following days, American fighters flew in daytime, strafing streets and even shooting mothers with babies seen on those streets]

The issue is not as clear-cut as many of us would like to believe. We, most of us, were appalled at the outrages perpetrated by the IRA in both Northern Ireland and the UK from, especially, 1970-1997. All right, but one IRA bombing might kill one or two, or perhaps a hundred, people, whereas a single plane, even in WW2, might kill hundreds or thousands of people, mostly “civilians”. That was taken further at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Is quantity even relevant?

These “thoughts out of season” were prompted not primarily by thoughts about politics, as such, but by the present plague of flying ants, which are at present such a nuisance in Southern England.

How bad does a nuisance have to be before extermination becomes the only perceived alternative? Do flying ants have rights, or at least the right to have their needs considered by humans?

Questions without answers, perhaps.

Tweets seen

Tweeter “@Tom5731” displaying an ignorance that is all too common. The Daily Mail support for the BUF was brief, and had been withdrawn by 1934.

Quite. To listen to some British people, you would think that nowhere else in the world has health services, or that they exist only for the wealthy few; or that the only alternative to the present NHS in the UK is some “pay or die” American-style health provision (though that is not a completely true characterization anyway).

That, however, is not the only aspect: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2018/12/10/tv-ads-and-soaps-are-the-propaganda-preferred-by-the-system-in-the-uk/.

See also: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/09/29/greta-thunberg-system-approved-wunderkind/; https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/10/09/extinction-rebellion-greta-thunberg-cressida-dick-and-the-madness-of-protesting-crowds/; https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/08/16/the-extinction-rebellion-levellers/; https://ianrobertmillard.org/2020/09/08/diary-blog-8-september-2020-including-further-assessment-of-extinction-rebellion-as-well-as-of-tim-crosland-and-plan-b-etc/.

Quite so. The weaponization of this relatively unimportant virus by means of a massive fear campaign has several benefits for the System. One is the —all but total— prohibition of traditional political activity.

Trad. politics? System politics? The perhaps vulgar but certainly accurate cartoon below makes the point quite well:

London. Zoo.

Boris-idiot. Boris the clown. Boris the part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer and liar. Only when you see how poor is this idiot and his mostly non-British Cabinet do you also understand how hopeless is misnamed “Labour” and its own idiotic leader, Starmer…

Starmer and Labour also offer nothing at all to the British people.

The law is being replaced by the wishes of the Government

Just heard radio news to the effect that various clowns in the present Cabinet are now saying that the facemask nonsense will “end” on 19 July 2021, 8 days from now, but that the public will be “expected” to wear facemasks inside “where appropriate” or the like.

In this country, the mere wishes of ministers and their advisers have never constituted binding law, not at least since the 17th Century.

Laws must be obeyed (on pain of penalty), but the wishes or “guidance” of government and administrators need not be obeyed unless made part of law by properly passed secondary legislation.

What we have here is a conflation of governmental wishes with law. It trashes the whole rule of law. In effect, it says, “do as we say even though it is not illegal not to do so.”

This has, perhaps intentionally, a confusing effect on public and police. We saw in 2020 how some police officers, both high and low in rank, seemed to enjoy arrogating to themselves powers which they, in law, did not actually possess: examining people’s shopping, stopping lone motorcyclists out for a spin etc.

The traditional line drawn was “law— to be obeyed, and to be enforced by courts and where necessary by police”, and “anything not law— voluntary in application”. That was right. This new “this is not the law but you really must do it” is actually the trashing of any concept of rule of law.

Late tweets

In the end, both the Scottish and Welsh nationalists were (in the late 20thC) infiltrated by System drones, and became just part of the System. The SNP is the more obvious, but Plaid Cymru is similar, just less successful.

Late tweets

I remain convinced that the only strategy that makes immediate sense is for there to be a relocation of social-national people to the South West of the UK. Concentration of forces. I have blogged about this in the past (from 2016 or 2017).

Late music

[1941-45 war memorial, Panfilov Park, Almaty, Kazakhstan]

Diary Blog, 13-14 June 2020

Just listened to a typically self-flagellating programme on BBC Radio 4. Two people whose fathers were “racists”. There was the son of John Beckett, a maverick British political martyr, and a lady who is so racked by fake “guilt” (fear that she might be “racist”) that she apparently examines her every word in case it offends the Pakistanis among whom she works in Leeds.

Beckett jnr. said today that his father was an “anti-Semite” who was himself “Jewish”. In fact, Beckett, a Labour MP who left the Labour Party in 1931 and, in 1934, joined Mosley in the British Union of Fascists, was only half-Jew (his mother was Jewish): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Beckett_(politician)

John Beckett was interned without trial for 5 years (1940-1945), then after the war was snooped upon for 10 years by the Security Service, MI5, losing the little jobs he was able to get here and there because MI5 officer Graham Mitchell (possibly a Soviet agent) secretly told companies to sack Beckett. Beckett was even followed around, and his telephone tapped. Life in a “free” country…(still freer in most respects than we are today, though…).

Strange that Radio 4 broadcast that piece today, when a black or multikulti mob is expected to descend on Central London. Maybe not so strange…

The connection may not be particularly relevant, but I think that another once quite influential minor political figure should be remembered today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._K._Chesterton

A.K. Chesterton made two major ideological errors, in my view: he turned against both National Socialist Germany (in 1939) and “anti-Semitism” (in the 1940s).

Tweets seen

This LBC reporter seems to support the black/multikulti “BLM” mob:


When the black/multikulti mob appear, the Metropolitan Police kneel in sign of fealty to them…

…and here (below) we see Jew sex pest barrister Rupert Myers, a prolific tweeter, tweeting against the British crowds. Needless to say, his type “support” the black/multikulti mob who were scared off today.

The barrister, Fawcett, tweeting above, shows himself to be even more anti-national. Looking at his Twitter profile photo, I have, I think, a pretty good idea of his provenance…

As for Myers, I do not recall much “kindness” from him when he tweeted about me in or about 2016, at a time when other Jews procured my disbarment for tweeting about the state of this country…see: https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/the-slide-of-the-english-bar-and-uk-society-continues-and-accelerates/ —Myers is not mentioned therein; that article is about the general scandal of my having been disbarred merely for having tweeted truth about society and politics; it is also about the leniency shown to others who have committed and been convicted of actual crimes while practising at the Bar.

“Kindness”? Au contraire; I seem to recall this Myers individual having the online equivalent of a good laugh at my expense.

I wonder what the girls he assaulted would think of his pretence of “kindness”? He was never prosecuted for anything, surprisingly, but I believe that GQ and other publications stopped using him as an occasional scribbler. https://www.legalcheek.com/2017/11/junior-barrister-whose-inappropriate-behaviour-made-women-feel-uncomfortable-admits-he-got-professional-help-after-metoo-shaming/

I suppose that he imagines that his defaults will be hidden under the sands of time…

In the meantime, he seems to have gone the Jonathan Aitken route (exculpation via belated confession).

Britain needs a complete change in terms of cultural norms and the so-called “Overton window”.

Having said the above about tweeter/barrister Neil Fawcett, I noticed this tweet, which is more interesting, because of its link to an article:


I blogged about such and/or connected matters a while ago:


Some more tweets seen today

That opinion poll is on all fours with other recent polling. The voters are stuck. The Boris-idiot government is flailing and failing, but the one alternative offered by Britain’s broken political system is the Keir Starmer, Israel-First “Labour” Party (Starmer, Angela Rayner, Rachel Reeves etc) which, even beyond its being under what amounts to Jew-Zionist control, is really just the party of the blacks, browns and/or those dependent on State funding (either because public service employees or because unemployed, disabled etc).

The result is the kind of polling just seen. In reality, behind that, is a good deal of societal unhappiness, frustration and anger.

First thoughts about the London “statues” confrontations

Firstly, that the white British contingents rule the streets, at least vis a vis the “BLM” mob. That is significant.

The BLM “leaders”, by which I do not mean that black woman with bleached hair but (((those))) behind her and her mob, thought to score an easy victory by not appearing today, thus avoiding battle. That might slightly resonate with the voter-“sheeple”, the kind of dim people who stood outside their houses clapping this failing System Britain.

The strategy has obviously been to outflank the white “statue protectors” etc by putting them in a fairly confined area, knowing that many will have brought alcohol with them, on a warm afternoon, then lighting the blue touchpaper by having the police provoke them. No bended knees today! Oh no! Only the “holy blacks” get that!

The impression given to TV viewers etc will be no better than that given by the black mobs in London, Bristol etc. Having said that, the primary fact is that the “BLM” mob ran away, in effect. The sometimes scruffy and sometimes tattooed or drunken white men there today may not look or behave much like the post-WW1 Freikorps, but they did, briefly, rule the streets. Significant.

In Wrexham, it is still 1975, apparently…

I don’t know why, out of all the uneducated and/or thick tweeters, this one caught my funny bone today, but there it is:

BBC bias

One expects a degree of anti-white, anti-British bias in the msm, but the BBC (eg BBC World News) has taken it to a whole new level today…


In the immortal words of old horror films, “It’s alive!” and “it speaks!”. The invisible shrinking “Prime Minister” has reappeared and made a typically stupid statement. Seems that it’s OK for a pack of blacks to rampage, damage old statues etc, but not for the whites to gather in protest…

This (below) made me laugh!

Several hundred did rally in Hyde Park, after a callout by Stand Up To Racism (SUTR). A witness at the scene said protesters made speeches before marching to Marble Arch and taking a knee. They dispersed soon after seeing suspected scouts from the opposing demo and fearing a confrontation.” [The Guardian]

Run, rabbits, run!



In fantasy politics, the multikulti “protesters” would have advanced on Whitehall, wave upon wave, only to be met by defence in depth: lines of Freikorps, machinegunning the untermenschen at short range, then tanks counter-attacking, crushing the enemies like insects under the tank tracks…

Sadly, the real situation looked (on video) more like a particularly rowdy pub chucking-out time.

Politically, what was the effect of today? I should say, mixed. On the one hand, the “nationalist” counter-protesters commanded the streets up to a point (the point at which the police resources and tactics defeated them); certainly the black or multikulti mob was scared off pretty well. That was good.

More negatively, just when the British people were turning heavily against the “BLM” and “antifa” mobs, the msm was able to screen film of the police struggling to suppress what looked like a scene from the worlds of football rowdiness or pub closing time. Nationalism was thus tarred with that brush for many sitting at home watching the TV news, no doubt. Already, the System politicians have been all over the msm and on Twitter, condemning the limited “far right violence”. So…not so good.

Were there an actual political party organizing today, the battle in Whitehall might have been something to build on. However, there was no party there doing anything.

Yes, John Golding of Britain First turned up, but his organization, though able to put a number of people on the streets, is not officially a party. It is not registered as such, so cannot go down a partly-electoral route (and failed when it tried that anyway).

On the other hand, there is no “secret army” of social-nationalists in the UK.

Result? A lot of noise, really. Still, it is good that the black/brown/white-traitor mobs ran away or failed to present themselves for combat.

Apart from that? More evidence that a “multicultural society” cannot work. People point to, say, Singapore, to “disprove” that contention, but Singapore is both very small (twice the size of the Isle of Wight) and effectively a police state.

In a “multicultural” (and multiracial) society, society has to be brought pretty close to a police state and, where there is a white population, the white people have to be reduced to the lower level or standard of the non-white population. Look at South Africa today. It is also happening in the UK.

A musical break at the end of Saturday…

Sunday 14 June

Newington Green also saw peaceful protests yesterday with dozens of demonstrators cramming onto a tiny patch of grass clutching signs
[above: multikulti mob, with a number of white traitors, at Newington Green, North East London, yesterday]

In the end, a white European population, unless utterly degraded, cannot be placed under the control of a non-white population.

Further, while it was possible, though unpleasant, for the English people (mainly English) to have to live with a smallish black/brown population, that black/brown population has now grown in numbers, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of the whole UK population (again, mostly in England). That situation cannot continue. A race/culture war is coming. The System has caused it.

Areas that will have to be subjected to cultural purge

  • The mainstream media
  • the police
  • the political milieu (politicians, but also parties, journalists etc)
  • the directly cultural sector of arts, museums etc
  • education, particularly at tertiary level
  • publishing
  • the civil service, right down to local authority level

Are you thinking what I’m thinking?”


I have little time for David Vance, a petty and unsuccessful politico from Northern Ireland, who is pro-Israel and pro-Jew (even though “they” seem to hate him…what a “cuck”!). Vance was exceptionally offensive to me on Twitter when I had an account. That despite (or because of?) the fact that he really is an ignorant fellow when set beside me (if I say so myself). All the same, he is sort-of on the right track here, though there is no nuance in his tweet.

The bottom line is that most British people, even most of the ones that accept the blacks being here (because it is often felt that we cannot get rid of them now) do not want most of the blacks and other ethnic minorities here and wish that the blacks now in the UK, or their parents and grandparents, had never been allowed to invade our country.

A salty story

Interesting piece about desalination: https://www.wired.com/story/desalination-is-booming-but-what-about-all-that-toxic-brine/

Don’t think that the UK police will save you, or the country

A POLICE force has urged its officers to ‘take the knee’ in support of Black Lives Matter protesters – or face trouble from protesters.

Hertfordshire Constabulary says those who don’t kneel at rallies “may become the focus of the protesters’ attention“. [The Sun]

Had I seen that in 1980, 1990, even 2010, I would have laughed and thought it satire, or “fake news”. Now, it is reality.


By the way, this is what Hertfordshire Police used as their official notification to their “troops”. Note the clenched fist…

Officers in Hertfordshire have now been advised to kneel if asked by protesters as part of 'Op Velour'

It beggars belief. The UK police are becoming the enemies of the British (i.e. white) people of this country.

Tweets seen recently

I myself shall resist wearing a facemask wherever I can do so. If I cannot do so without being subject to arrest and penalty, or without being excluded from shops or other places, I shall regard it as my right to use the imposition as a licence to do whatever I please under cloak of invisibility.

Went to car. Turned on BBC Radio 3. Some shite about how badly blacks were treated decades or even centuries ago in North America. Jesus H. Christ! Can you never get away from this absolute shite?!

It is very obvious now that the msm System propaganda (in the UK and also elsewhere) is going all out for what amounts to the “Great Replacement” of whites by non-whites. Down the line? What amounts to “white genocide” via mixed-race births and the hugely reduced percentage in this world (even as compared to say 50 years ago) of European-race people.

We are fighting for survival now. For the survival of the descendants of the Aryans in this world and for our future, and for the future of, not only European-origined humanity, but all humanity.

On Marching and Demonstrating

Should social nationalists march or demonstrate? My answer is the qualified, “only if the march or demonstration looks credible and maybe not even then”. What does that mean?

Some older people reading this will recall the National Front marches of the 1970s, with their aspiration to “a forest of Union Jacks”. Those marches were sometimes “credible” (meaning large enough not to be laughed at by hostile elements or the public generally) but had their drawbacks. All marchers were photographed (openly) by State security staff, as well as by the Press and/or Jewish Zionist snoopers. The police usually decided on the route in consultation with the organizers, as is usual now. The whole show was State-controlled. The resulting publicity was usually quite unfavourable, partly because the violence caused by anti-NF protesters tainted the NF marchers themselves, partly because of the unremittingly-hostile Press coverage, partly because many of the public could not see why such marches had to happen, disrupting superficially “peaceful” areas.

Unfavourable publicity from biased mainstream media, Jewish/Zionist provocation, public incomprehension. All of these were not new even in the 1970s. Mosley and the BUF faced similar problems in the 1930s. The uniformed marches remain controversial today, with even some who look kindly upon them blaming them for the relatively poor showing of the BUF in elections. The same is said of the famous rally at Olympia in 1934. After that, election results worsened and, importantly, the Daily Mail withdrew its support. BUF membership, which at one time had approached 50,000, dropped to 8,000 by 1935 (though at time of repression and involuntary disbandment in 1940, numbers had recovered to 20,000).

That was then and a different UK political milieu, but it can probably be said that Mosley and the BUF would have done better in terms of public perception without marches and, indeed, political uniforms (banned by the Public Order Act 1936).

The milieu today is one in which the Internet plays an important role. The mainstream media are losing ground in public visibility. The printed Press is dying: the Independent no longer publishes on paper, The Guardian begs its dwindling readership for donations. Where do public marches have a place?

It will be remembered that, a couple of years ago, a misguided young man started pushing on Twitter and elsewhere for marches against the Jewish influence in London, particularly North London and specifically in the (Orthodox Jew/Hasid) Stamford Hill area and also (later, in 2015) in the Golders Green neighbourhood. Some might say that that boat has well and truly sailed!

I opposed the idea on Twitter as soon as I became aware of it, not because I have any great liking for Jews of any kind, but for three main reasons:

  • firstly and most importantly, because such marches would probably be small, have to be protected by the ordinary police and make social nationalism look pathetic;
  • secondly, because the public would see such activity (especially through the msm lens) as an “unprovoked” attack on the Jews of those parts of London; and
  • thirdly, because it is the duty of social nationalists to put forward a vision of a better society, not to make futile gestures of a negative nature towards groups, even alien groups.

The result was all too predictable: the first event was abandoned (the organizer having been banned by the authorities from entering within the M25 area); the second “march” was moved, on the say-so of the police, to at least 7 miles from Golders Green. In the end, about 10 “marchers” held a static demonstration in a Central London street. The organizer (Joshua Bonehill) was absent, having been arrested. He was later convicted of “incitement” of “racial hatred” against Jews and is still in prison.

A sorry tale, though it seems that that young man has reconsidered his position while in prison and has come to the conclusion (according to his Wikipedia entry) that the thing to do is to try to build a political base in the rural area from which he originated (southern Somerset). Better.

Can marches etc ever be useful these days? I think that the answer, at least on a 99% basis, must be “no”. The trade unions have raised marches numbering 500,000 against UK “austerity” cuts, without effect. Going back further, the anti-Iraq War march of 2003 in London is said by some to have topped a million (others say 500,000), while in Rome, the figure was 3 million. Overall, the anti-Iraq War protests of 2003 are said to have been “the largest protest event in human history” [Wikipedia]. Result? No change of policy by government(s) at all.

My conclusion from the above is that public protests are a distraction from real political activity.