Tag Archives: Karin Kneissl

Diary Blog, 12 January 2026

Afternoon music

Tweets seen

So be it. No argument; however, Reform UK is the only vehicle at present which can break up the rigged “two main parties” scam.

Even more striking when you consider the population numbers, and so the per capita figures.

[“Let me take you back to an interesting event from 2018.

The then FM of Austria extended a casual wedding invitation to Vladimir Putin during her diplomatic visit to Moscow.

She never imagined he would take it seriously as it was just a courtesy invitation, not an expectation. But on August 18, 2018, a Russian state aircraft landed in Austria.

Vladimir Putin didn’t just attend the wedding. he arrived with a Cossack choir and a traditional samovar as a gift. Cameras went crazy. Music filled the air. And in a moment that would echo far beyond the dance floor, the Foreign Minister of a neutral EU nation took the hand of the Kremlin’s leader.

They waltzed. Brussels watched. When the music ended, Karin Kneissl performed a deep, traditional Austrian curtsey. That single bow ended her career.

Within hours, the image was weaponized. Political opponents framed it as proof of Austria’s “submission” to Moscow. Brussels politicians, globalist elites, and her domestic critics closed ranks. She was no longer a minister she was labeled a traitor, a spy, a pariah. Death threats followed.

Despite speaking seven languages and holding a doctorate in international law, she found herself erased almost instantly. Her bank accounts were frozen. Her name was blacklisted in her own country. They didn’t just push her out of office. They pushed her out of entire Europe.

Kneissl first fled to France, but exile followed her there too. Her accounts were blocked again. She said pressure was placed on her landlord to evict her.

With no footing left in Europe, she moved to a small village in Lebanon, living like a peasant in quiet exile far from the halls of power she once navigated with ease. And then came the final irony.

The woman driven out of Europe for dancing with Putin eventually found her only refuge in Russia. She describes the financial strangulation across Europe as the decisive force behind her departure first to Lebanon, and finally eastward to Russia.

Today, she lives in Saint Petersburg, heads a geopolitical think tank, and resides in a country cottage.

Her story is not just about a dance. It is about a continent at war with itself. About how symbolism now outweighs substance. And about how, in modern Europe, a single gesture, a bow, a waltz, one unguarded moment against the higher power can cost you everything. They said she danced with the wolf. And Europe elite made sure she paid the price. That’s why you see the likes of Kaja Kallas, Ursula von der Leyen, and others obey without hesitation. No one is allowed to step out of line because they know exactly what happens when you do.“]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karin_Kneissl

Austria is a corrupt little country. Look what happened when David Irving gave a talk there. He ended up (by reason of the usual Jewish whining and demanding) actually doing time in a pretty harsh Austrian prison; he sat there for one year out of a nominal three-year sentence…in a country where African and Middle Eastern, and Afghan, “asylum-seeker” untermenschen get trivial sentences for raping Austrian schoolgirls.

Just as EU politicians are scared back into line by, inter alia, what happened to Karin Kneissl, so almost all prominent historians are scared to examine the many many fakeries and lies abounding in the Jew-Zionist “holocaust” farrago, because they see what happened to David Irving— blacklisted, “cancelled”, his books not published, some editions even pulped or burned etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Irving#Life_after_the_libel_suit

Too little, too late, Goodwin. A post-Aryan ethnostate is vital.

As predicted on the blog long ago, Reform UK is rapidly turning into a System party. Pro-Jew, pro-Israel, willing (in principle) to turn back new migrant-invaders but not those already here, unwilling to remove or restrict or corrall any other non-whites.

The Reform decision to welcome the likes of Zahawi (a corrupt, freeloading, expenses-cheating, fraudulent Kurd), who made money hand over fist during his time as “Conservative” MP, just underlines (as did previous similar decisions) that Reform will not be much good for the British people (as also long=-predicted on the blog).

Why, then, do I hope that Reform does well? Because it may well destroy the old-established Con/Lab System parties, aka “uniparty”. Their long heritage confers unmerited credibility. Once they are destroyed by Reform, Reform itself, with its shallow roots, lack of real integrity and with no ideology, can itself be destroyed by popular social-national upsurge.

Incidentally, that opinion poll, above, would translate to a Commons with about 424 Reform MPs, Lab 71, 45 LibDems, 42 SNP, 21 Cons, and 11 Greens [etc].

That would be a kind of quasi-populist Con-style police state, which might well precipitate a kind of civil war or social war. Still, and as Lenin said, perhaps in the end “worse will mean better“. I wonder.

One thing is for sure. If there is a Reform landslide, and Reform then either does nothing much, or tries to impose a finance-capital police state, the people will, finally, be ready for social-nationalism as a remedy.

Late tweets

[“I see everyone moaning about the “Islamophobia” bill trying to be passed, but most people won’t acknowledge, or at least dismiss, this happening before in our country and throughout Europe and the Anglosphere. I am talking about “Antisemitism” or at least what our governments are defining that as. The “Islamophobia” bill being passed is more or less what we already have regarding jews. It’s called the IHRA. These are guidelines that are used to gage what can conflate to “hateful speech” and therefore a charge can be brought up after in a general “hate crime”. That’s right, there’s not an official criminal offence for antisemitism here in England and Wales law. The IHRA has caused a lot of ambiguity since it was brought in and has led to some serious speech offences in some countries. The IHRA also came in around the time of the Brexit referendum, so make that of what you will. Long before the IHRA, several countries made it a criminal offence to deny the Holocaust. What other historical event has been criminalised to deny or question throughout history? Absolutely zero. It really shows who pulls the strings in the West, that’s for sure. So, if you are outraged by the “Islamophobia” bill trying to be brought in, you should also be outraged by what’s already happened regarding the IHRA. You’re a plastic patriot if you make exemptions for some groups over others. No ethnic minority is above criticism in a White nation. We need valid criticism to fix England. You can’t discriminate if you discriminate against everyone.“]

As Sophie Meaden says or implies, the English courts have repeatedly underlined that neither “antisemitism”, as such, nor “holocaust” “denial”, as such, are illegal in this country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepnohirsk

Russian advances continue.

Late music

Diary Blog, 26 March 2024

Afternoon music

Tweets seen

From the newspapers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13239643/Israeli-brothers-detained-HOURS-anti-Semitic-staff-Manchester-Airport-heroes-Nova-massacre-saved-dozens-Hamas-terrorists-apology.html

Unwanted here. Troublemakers.

More tweets

All high-ranking members of the Kiev regime are legitimate targets, most of all Zelensky himself, and Danilov.

Israeli embassies worldwide are not normal diplomatic buildings but centres for every kind of subversion and snooping, even compared to some others which mix diplomacy with an illegitimate amount of espionage and other activity.

London court postpones Assange’s extradition to the US Julian Assange has been granted a reprieve in his fight against extradition to America.

London’s Supreme Court has ruled that the WikiLeaks founder can take his case to an appeal hearing if the UK and US fail to meet certain conditions, The Guardian writes.

The court demands that the United States allow Assange to invoke the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech. They must also ensure that his Australian citizenship will not affect the proceedings, and that the death penalty will not be taken against the whistleblower, the publication explains.

If the court does not receive such guarantees by April 16, the defense will be able to appeal. However, even if assurances are provided, the parties will be able to file a motion before a final decision is made to file an appeal, the article emphasizes. If Assange is denied permission to appeal, he could be sent to the United States within days to face espionage charges.

His lawyers insist that the charges related to WikiLeaks’ publication of thousands of secret and diplomatic documents related to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are politically motivated and the extradition request is illegal.

A purely political and malicious attempt to silence a truthteller. On a smaller stage, the same happened to me, most recently in 2023-2014.

At what point does that sort of thing stop being foolishness (or idiocy) and start to become a form of deliberate treason?

…and who, or what, really, is Macron? Read my assessment from 2019: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/09/on-recent-events-in-france/.

That seems to be a reference to American ex-officer Macgregor: see

Late music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C5%ABcija_Gar%C5%ABta]
[Victor Ostrovsky, The Rendezvous]

Crowdfunder

My crowdfunder, set up to pay the court-imposed costs of my recent free speech trial, remains open. All donations gratefully received. If you cannot donate, please share the link as widely as possible. Thank you.

https://www.givesendgo.com/GC14J