Tag Archives: Motability

Diary Blog, 25 November 2025

Morning music

Tweets seen

Lewis should have been struck off the solicitors’ roll about 15 years ago.

Britain is now so suffused with decadence that, at first, I did not see that lump of concrete as a defensive measure against crazed Islamists but as some equally-crazed “artwork”, of the sort likely to be found at Tate Modern, or winning the Turner Prize.

People should not comment on such issues unless they have a modicum of knowledge; premium-quality cars are not given out free by Motability. The registered keepers have to pay a premium for them, which premium can be many thousands of pounds.

[“THIS WAS ME SEVEN YEARS AGO Back then, like a lot of people just waking up, I thought the problem was simple: “It’s just Islam.” I was full of energy, starting my activism, calling for mass repatriation and thinking that if we could just deal with radical Islam, everything would be fine. Classic civic nationalism – proud of my country, focused on “values” and “integration,” still believing the system could be fixed if we won a few elections. Then I started reading. Really reading. Digging into crime statistics that nobody wanted to talk about, fertility rates, housing pressures, the endless anti-white propaganda in schools and media, the way lobbying groups and globalist NGOs actually shape policy… and yes, the role of organized Zionist influence in both parties and in foreign wars that have nothing to do with British (or European/American) interests. One red pill after another. What I realised wasn’t just that Islam is incompatible – it was that mass third-world immigration of any kind is demographic replacement, no matter how “moderate” the newcomers claim to be. That the political class, left and right, sold us out decades ago. That civic nationalism is a comforting halfway house – it feels radical when you first arrive, but it still leaves the door wide open for the same people who created the problem to keep running the show. I went from “stop the boats and ban the burqa” to understanding we need total remigration – a complete and unapologetic reversal of the post-war population transfer into our homelands. Full nationalism. Ethno-nationalism. Whatever the controlled media calls it to scare you – that’s where the truth is.If you’re a civic nationalist right now reading this and feeling that nagging doubt – “maybe we do need to go further” – trust that instinct. I was exactly where you are seven years ago. I thought the people calling for full remigration were “too extreme.” Turns out they were just seven years ahead. The journey is tough at first. You’ll lose some friends. Family might call you names. But on the other side is clarity, purpose, and the knowledge that you’re no longer compromising on the survival of your people. If I could make that leap, so can you. Start reading. Question everything you’ve been told about “diversity” and “tolerance.” Follow the patterns instead of the talking points. Your nation needs you – the real you, not the civic version. Take the next step. You won’t regret it.“]

More music

More tweets seen

[“Juries have been the last line of defence against the authoritarian cancel mob. When our members have found themselves charged with criminal offences for speaking out, juries have reliably said no dice to overzealous prosecutors. This has infuriated the CPS and the activists who make malicious complaints. One was Jamie Michael, a decorated Royal Marines veteran, who was charged with inciting racial hatred after a Labour staffer reported him to the police for a video he posted on Facebook. Jamie spent 20 days in prison on remand. A jury took just 17 minutes to clear him. The local Labour Party were said to be furious. Now David Lammy wants to scrap juries and give judges — who are required to follow DEI policies — the sole power to convict and jail Brits for up to 5 years for online posts. This move is about power, not saving costs. Nothing in our present national situation warrants abandoning an 800-year-old right: that in a court of law, your peers decide if you’re guilty, not the state. We will fight any such proposal with everything we’ve go“]

If the “ape in a silk suit“, Lammy, intends to go ahead with this, he may live to regret it.

That process is already well under way.

I have met, many years ago, untold numbers of —mostly young— people who would be horrified to be thought of as “tourists” (as distinct from socially-aware travellers). The vast majority were pretty silly people.

Quite…

Ha ha! A painted “admiral” on a painted ship on a painted ocean. What world do these people live in? What actually do they think we should be “defending”, the way that the UK now is?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwyn_Jenkins

Meanwhile, the whole society is imploding via the migration invasion, the only real invasion this country faces.

What is crucial, though, is that it should be spent only on British people.

For once, I agree with him.

Send them home”? How about “put them up against a wall“?

Raus!

Diary Blog, 17 October 2025

Morning music

Tweets seen

Translates to about 437 Reform UK MPs, 57 LibDems, 46 SNP, 38 Lab, 27 Con, 19 Green, 5 Plaid (etc).

If not an outlier, or anomalous set of results, this is stunning.

The headline result for Reform would be, in the British context, near-revolutionary, and would cause an almost-immediate Constitutional crisis, in that Reform has no peers at all in the Lords.

An influx of hundreds of Reform MPs of very varied views, on that scale, would lead to hard-to-predict events over the succeeding 5 years.

Labour (38 MPs) below LibDems (57 MPs) for the first time (formerly, of course, sub nom Liberal Party) since the 1920s. Hard to believe.

Conservatives with only 27 MPs, but that would be not quite as bad as other recent polls, which have predicted as few as 7 Con MPs. Reform was on 32% in this poll; another recent poll had them on 36%.

Greens with 19 MPs! The “watermelon party”, of course, green outside, but light red inside…

Of course, Labour is being pulled apart by centrifugal forces. The Pakistani/Muslim/Islamist element is defecting to Galloway’s “Workers’ Party”, to Islamist independent factions, to Corbyn’s anti-Israel “Your Party” etc. The craven pro-Israel, pro-Jewish lobby stance of Starmer-stein’s Labour Friends of Israel government has alienated many of the very voters on which Labour is now mainly dependent: Muslims, non-whites generally, would-be “progressives” etc.

Interesting times in British politics.

[“Anyone who backed him the second time round after Truss and the spies should be shot. That includes Rudd etc. I said to father of children and best friend – who both lost their seats because of Tom – dear lord please don’t back him again. One did, the other was more sensible and entirely where I was on candidates despite being on very different wings of the party. When Tugendhat came to Poole to “help” during the election campaign I made my views known – we could not afford to lose a single vote and having probably the most notorious backed-Truss-for-a-job “helping” was a disaster. We lost by a handful. He partied as colleagues cleared their desks in tears, only interested in canvassing support for a run not a moment of grief for his party. Just disgusting. Ruthless bugger. One of so many reasons I’m glad to be free of this sort of nonsense. There is so little honour left in the Tories and TT is one of the absolute worst. Ugh.“]

Though of course the lady tweeter there would never make the point, Tom Tugendhat, the MP and former chocolate soldier, is a quarter-Jew whose family origins, some of them, are in Bielsko-Biala, Silesia (Poland, but once, pre-1918, part of Austrian Silesia under the name Bielitz ).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Tugendhat.

Incidentally, and as blogged previously, I know the Bielsko-Biala area slightly, having visited twice in the late 1980s, and having spent a total of about 4 weeks there.

Of course, the Conservatives having now fallen well below 20% in the opinion polls, the infighting about who should replace Nigerian chancer Kemi Carpetbagger as Con Party leader does rather look like bald men and women fighting over a comb, especially as 1. some predictions suggest that the number of Conservative Party MPs post-2028/2029 might fall as low as 7; and 2. all of those currently hoping to replace Kemi Badenoch are predicted to lose their Commons seats anyway (as is Kemi Badenoch herself).

Jewish-lobby puppet Michael Gove, a former scribbler and former MP expenses cheat and fraud, as well as a drunk and cocaine-abuser now Editor of The Spectator, weighs in to demand that notorious Israeli Jew football hooligans, Maccabi Tel Aviv, be allowed to have a “rumble in the jungle” in the West Midlands. Nein danke.

Starmer-stein never has explained how his “one in, one out” idea reduces immigration and the numbers here. Of course it cannot. At best (if it ever worked anyway) it would keep the huge numbers (of illegals; “legal” migrants would still flood in) static. Why am I even bothering to discuss this ridiculous scheme? It is just a scam for public relations purposes…

Not so remarkable when you consider the pervasive Jewish/pro-Israel influence over System politics in the UK.

Defend the children of the poor, and punish the wrongdoer” [Biblical phrase — adapted from Psalm 72:4— inscribed above the main entrance of “the Bailey” —Central Criminal Court, London, aka “Old Bailey”]

That Egyptian, after some punishment, should be given a choice— back to Egypt, or up against a wall. In fact, maybe just put him up against a wall anyway.

Egypt is still OK for a holiday, so long as you are in a good hotel. Admittedly, I have not been there for about 27 years. As a country, Egypt welcomes tourists, but not political dissidents, potential terrorists, or spies.

My own experiences include the following:

The Starmer-stein Labour Friends of Israel misgovernment. Rachel Reeves’ spending cuts take away monies from various groups of mainly English/British people in order to have money to waste on migrant-invaders, Ukrainians, and Jews (in the UK and in Israel).

Rachel Reeves is evil, as well as being a moneygrubber and an expenses cheat.

As already mentioned, it is hard to see who will be left able and willing to vote Labour. Even “the blacks and browns” are largely charging for the exit. The Muslims certainly are, despite attempts to placate them.

Hard to see many pensioners, or those approaching pensionable age─ say anyone over 55, voting Labour, despite Reeves and Starmer keeping (so far) the State Pension Triple Lock.

The previously very supportive under-30 group of potential voters also seem to be turning their collective face against Labour, and going Green or LibDem; some are now turning to Reform UK as well..

Looked at like that, the at-first surprising (?) recent polling suggesting only 15% of voters intend to vote Labour makes sense.

Late tweets seen

More genocidal actions by [Israeli] Jews.

The Kiev regime must know that, at the end of the day, Russian forces have 6,000+ nuclear weapons. Russia may not want to use any in Ukraine, but the fact remains that, should the orders be given, Kiev and other major centres of population and industry could be reduced, entirely, to rubble and radioactive ash in a matter of, at most, half an hour.

…because Russian forces are slowly but steadily advancing along the entire active front.

Late thought

Just saw the film Oppenheimer, about the atom-bomb scientist. Pretty good, but too long by about half an hour and that last 30 mins or so of typically-American stuff about postwar legal arguments, and Congressional hearings, could have been cut out without loss.

One part of the film struck me, though the specific facts were not new to me, I having read books about the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb spies etc.

The film reminded me that the scientists at Los Alamos in the early 1940s were concerned that the first atom bomb might start a chain reaction which would be unstoppable and cause, inter alia, the atmosphere of the Earth to ignite. Despite that possibility still existing at time of detonation of the first full test, they decided to go ahead. Why? Well, almost all of the important scientists were Jews, and for them the defeat of the “antisemitic” German Reich was more important than the possibility that all life on Earth might be destroyed.

Lesson? For “them”, it really is always “all about them”…

Late talking point

Starmer-stein, for whom real British people always come second, third, fourth, or last…