Tag Archives: TV soaps

Diary Blog, 28 August 2025, including a video debunking the “Windrush” fake history

Afternoon music

The Empire Windrush and “the Windrush Generation”— fake history

A video published by Laura Towler, one of the leaders of the Patriotic Alternative group.

Well worth watching.

Note from the video that most if not all of those directly profiting from the Empire Windrush voyages were Jews. Others later profited indirectly (eg Peter Rachman, the slum landlord, speculator and, in the terminology of 2025, “plastic gangster”).

Rachman [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Rachman] was also connected with real gangsters (the Krays, who were ethnically mixed, being part Irish, part Jewish, part Gypsy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kray_twins).

Incidentally, Rachman went “up the chimney” at the age of 43, but from natural causes (a heart attack).

Tweets seen

[“Outrageous. Lawyers for the Epping Hotel have argued “the perceived risk” of housing illegal migrants is being “fuelled by disinformation on social media”. A reminder: —the sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl by an Ethiopian asylum-seeker in Epping, who said he wanted to make “Jamaican babies”, is not “disinformation” —the kidnap, strangulation and r*pe of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton is not “disinformation” —the r*pe of a 12-year-old by a Syrian illegal migrant in Birmingham is not “disinformation” -the attempted kidnapping of a 10-year-old in Stockport by an asylum-seeker from Sudan is not “disinformation” —the r*pe of an 8-year-old in Lambeth by an asylum-seeker from Pakistan is not “disinformation” —the murder of a pensioner in Hartlepool, Terence Carney, by an asylum-seeker from Morocco is not “disinformation” —the murder of a young British man, Thomas Roberts, by an asylum-seeker from Afghanistan is not “disinformation” In fact, the only people who have been spreading “disinformation” is the state itself which not only imported thousands of people from Afghanistan while gagging the UK press, hiding it from British citizens and charging them billions for the privilege but not consistently gaslights us by reframing real world events as “disinformation” People are so sick and tired of this.”]

The “illegals” (illegal migrant-invaders) are, however, only about 5% of the whole problem. Looked at in the widest way, in fact, only about 1%, if that, of the whole problem. Not that nothing should be done, though. Start with the rubber boat invaders and take it from there.

Walls. Squads. End(s).

See also:

Mein Gott! No wonder the main System parties are now pulling every dirty trick known to slime-politics against Reform!

That opinion poll translates to a Commons with no less than 450 Reform UK MPs, Lab 61, LibDems 52, SNP 43, Cons 14, Greens 6 (etc).

Whether you call it (were it to happen) a very large majority for Reform, a “supermajority”, or a peaceful revolution, the fact is that such a result would render the existing System parties irrelevant and, certainly in the case of the Conservative Party, redundant, or near-dead.

Among Con Party MPs for the chop would be Kemi Badenoch, Suella Braverman, Priti Patel, Kit Malthouse, Mel Stride, and Robert Jenrick. I have not worked out who would be among the 14 left standing, but that would be merely of academic interest anyway, were there to be such a cull.

Cleverly was a bad joke as Foreign Secretary but not by reason of the fact that, like David Lammy, he is non-white (actually a half-caste), because Liz Truss and “Boris”-idiot were both mainly white British, and they were also bad jokes in the role (and both later became bad-joke Prime Ministers). Cleverly was a bad joke, like all others mentioned, by reason of his ignorance and stupidity.

The lady tweeter might like to note what all of those (Badenoch, Sunak, Cleverly) except Jenrick have in common— non-whites. Most British voters will, even after decades of msm brainwashing, not prefer a non-white as Prime Minister. It is not the only factor voters take into account, but it is one factor. They are, in effect, not even voting for MPs, but for a party, and a Prime Minister-designate.

I should imagine that the lady tweeter, Fiona-Natasha Syms, once married to —and employed via expenses by— a Conservative MP who lost his seat by only 7 votes in 2024) is correct that Jenrick will replace Badenoch as Con Party leader. Jenrick is not merely, in neurolinguistic terms, modelling Farage and Reform UK, but almost mirroring them.

The Conservative Party is actually without a purpose or role now. The England (Britain, but mainly England) from which it came has largely disappeared. Its former heartland or core— the rural counties, the patriotic working and middle classes and the landowning and factory-owning classes, have all morphed into different creatures entirely.

The Empire, Commonwealth (in any real way), monarchy, have gone, or effectively gone to perdition. The Con Party in 2025 is basically the property of the Jew-Zionist lobby, the Indian and other ultra-wealthy cabals etc, and is totally out of touch with British people and events.

More tweets

Civil wars (which is really what the Russia-Ukraine conflict is) are bitter and awkward. The USA really only emerged from the shadow of the American Civil War a century or so after it finished; maybe in the 1980s, so well over a century later.

Of course. At age 25, they will be drafted. Their answer? To flee the fake state of “Ukraine” and try to live elsewhere. To be drafted, and then sent to the Kiev regime’s crumbling front lines, is a death sentence.

The problem is not, mainly, high taxation, as such (so long as that does not seem utterly confiscatory), but —quite precisely— what those taxation monies are spent on.

Israel is doomed.

I am no expert on aviation, but my understanding is that, unlike commercial-fleet passenger or freight aircraft, and most bomber aircraft, fighter aircraft are made, quite deliberately, unstable, in order to be swiftly manoeuvrable by a skilled pilot. In the past, some fighter aircraft have been almost unusable for that reason; the Lockheed Starfighter of the 1960s was one such.

Late music

[British Avro Lancaster bomber aircraft, 1942 (RAF official painting)]

Diary Blog, 29 May 2022

Morning music

[Akademgorodok]

On this day a year ago

Tweets seen

David Icke used to follow my Twitter account. In fact, leaving aside organizational and corporate accounts, mine was one of a very small handful that Icke followed.

I was expelled from Twitter in 2018 after a campaign by the usual whining and/or demanding Jews, connected to the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”].

Icke was also expelled from Twitter, a couple of years later. Same situation. Same pack of Jews.

Such expulsions are the main reason why Twitter is now relatively dull in every way. I use it as a convenient way of filling gaps in my blog with news and comment but, as a real tool of influence in itself, it has been killed, and killed by “them”. It’s always “them”…

See also: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2017/07/13/when-i-was-a-victim-of-a-malicious-zionist-complaint/; and

Quite a few of the vandalistic sort of “anti-Semitic” actions seen over the years in the USA, UK etc, actions such as drawing swastikas, damaging bits and pieces in Jewish cemeteries etc, have actually been found to have been perpetrated by Jews, often with the motive of Jews being then able to whine about how oppressed they are by —mainly invented— “antisemitism” etc (which then leads to money —many millions of pounds in the UK alone— being given by government to Jew-Zionist “security” (snooping and strongarm) orgs to pay for, supposedly, an increase in security at Jewish religious and educational centres; also leading to pressure for laws being passed to restrict “anti-Semitic” comment online and offline.

Afternoon music

[Compton Wynyates, Warwickshire; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_Wynyates]

Polanski

Far be it from me to defend a Polish Jew, but truth demands exposure. As a film director, Polanski is pretty good. It is ironic that one of his least-interesting films, arguably, is (again arguably) his best-known— Chinatown [1974]. I saw it very long ago, and found it confused. Perhaps I should see it again before being too critical. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinatown_(1974_film)

What has always struck me about the films of Polanski is the element of surprise and, indeed, shock, that they all seem to have. Most if not all have some scenes where the unexpected slaps you in the face.

As to the sex crime with which Polanski was charged in 1977, perhaps I am being too kind, but it strikes me as a bit of a storm in a teacup. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski.

Yes, Polanski having a sexual encounter with a young girl (13-y-o), was a crime under Californian law. She seems to have been not unwilling, which though irrelevant legally, has at least some relevance in background terms. She has made public, as an adult, the fact that she does not want Polanski to be further penalized. Anyway, it is long ago now, 45 years in fact.

There is a kind of neo-Puritanism about, which demands that artists (even ones long-dead) must be very straitlaced, which not all are. I suppose that the fuss about Eric Gill is another fairly recent example. So must we destroy or remove from public view the works of, say, Caravaggio?

The nonsense about Polanski and others is akin to the demand of the “Black Lives Matter” idiots that statues and other memorabilia associated with persons themselves even obliquely associated with slavery be removed or destroyed. If that were carried into effect, almost all famous people from 15th to 19th centuries (in the UK and many other countries) would have to have their statues torn down. And what of the surviving statues of ancient rulers and others? Or does the present pursed-lipped disapproval apply only to black slaves?

More tweets

“Foundling”, not “founding“, but no matter. What a very nice confirmation of the view expressed by C.S. Lewis (and cited in the Foreword to the beautiful book, Sold for a Farthing, by Clare Kipps) that the “tame” state (not afraid of, or hostile to, humans) is the truly natural state of being for the animal kingdom, though as yet largely unfulfilled.

[Clare Kipps with Clarence, “a common house sparrow“]

Social parasitism

Buy-to-let parasitism.

Midsomer Murders

Saw an episode of Midsomer Murders, the first seen by me, as far as I can recall, for two or three years. Basic format much as in the past, but “the Great Replacement” agenda has really taken over.

In the small Berkshire/Oxfordshire-type village(s) in question, in the past all-white, the white English are now scarcely a majority. The first scene, at the village green, had some English people, but also blacks, browns, and Chinese, in numbers.

The demographic change was so marked that it made me laugh. It was as if (?) some “woke” idiot had gone round with a clipboard, ticking off “types”, as in “now let me see…three Chinese, several blacks, a few Indians and Pakistanis, a few white English.…” etc. The final scene was absurd: the two (white English) detectives, the last planned (but saved) victim (Indo-Pakistani), and three perpetrators— a black woman, another Indian, and one white English. In a tiny English village in the country…

Several years ago, “activists” complained that the show was too English. It “needed” more blacks and browns, they said…

Transparent, of course, to someone of my age etc, but that kind of propaganda is aimed at those of much greener years. Normalization of a basically non-English, non-European, society.

See also: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2018/12/10/tv-ads-and-soaps-are-the-propaganda-preferred-by-the-system-in-the-uk/.

See also:

Late tweets seen

Not sure that I entirely agree, despite “Boris” himself, repeatedly over the years, trying to present himself as a kind of am-dram Churchill.

Whatever the many flaws of Churchill, he was certainly a great historical figure, with real talents. To compare Churchill to Boris-idiot is to insult the former and flatter hugely the latter. I say that despite being implacably opposed to most of Churchill’s policies.

As I have blogged before, if comparing Churchill to “Boris” at all, the verdict must be, in the famous words of Marx, “first time— tragedy; second time— farce“… (from Marx’s 18th Brumaire, if I am not mistaken; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eighteenth_Brumaire_of_Louis_Bonaparte).

Late music