Afternoon music
Battles past
Tweets seen
If one were to hit the reactors at Dimona, that really would put the cat among the pigeons (or should that be the vultures?).
Clausewitz recommended that offensive force be concentrated on one direction, ideally upon a single point, later termed the Schwerpunkt, not dispersed here and there.
More music
More tweets seen
Israel is doing this. Those who support it, and who live elsewhere in the world, are complicit.
The weasel words of the supporters of Israel cannot justify the destruction of a whole city, the inhabitants of which are, half of them, under -18; a quarter of the population consists of babies or small children.
Israel may have nuclear weapons, nerve gas, tanks, jet aircraft, missiles etc, not to mention an over-wealthy and over-powerful support group in the rest of the world, but its days are numbered.
A degree of global warming may be happening, but the causation seems to be largely not human activity. It is suspicious how much fakery there has been around it all.
Again, weather in any given place is not the same as climate globally, but Greta Nut, in any event, has nothing interesting or useful to say.
Jews abusing “law”, or laws, in order to get what they want (in that clip, in occupied Palestine).
Now where have I heard about Jewish “lawfare” before?…
The inhuman hand of Israel and the Jew-Zionist lobby reaches right into the heart of most Western governments.
Indian money-juggler Rishi Sunak is just another of “their” puppets, likely to be replaced next year by “Labour” Israel-puppet Starmer.
As for Paul Bristow, at least one Con Party MP has not completely sold out his own sense of decency.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Bristow
I suppose that he feels that he has little to lose. Peterborough will probably swing back to Labour next year: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterborough_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2010s
I blogged about the 2019 Peterborough by-election (in which Bristow came in only third) at the time: see my pre-poll blog post https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/05/09/notes-from-the-peterborough-by-election/; he was elected several months later, at the 2019 General Election.
I also penned a post-poll analysis: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/06/07/peterborough-by-election-post-poll-analysis-and-thoughts/.
In fact, I had already, earlier, blogged about the “deadhead MP” Fiona Onasanya, whose removal and imprisonment triggered the by-election: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2018/12/21/deadhead-mps-an-occasional-series-the-fiona-onasanya-story/. As far as I know, she is still “on the dole”, having also been struck off the roll of solicitors (she had worked as a legal gopher for a couple of years prior to getting in on the old “MP” racket).
Late tweets seen
Suella Braverman has nothing but her political career. She was no more than mediocre as barrister: her “KC” status is an honorific one, in effect, granted after she became Attorney-General; in fact, at one time, all MP-barristers were granted “KC” on the nod (one such, in the 1960s, was John Mortimer, the writer). Suella Braverman will never return to the practising Bar.
My view is that Suella Braverman can see the way the wind is blowing; most Con Party MPs will not be MPs after next year. She, however, is in a very safe Con Party seat (Fareham), where she scored 63.7% of the vote in 2019. She will almost certainly be re-elected in 2024.
Suella Braverman’s populist anti-migration-invasion stance will also prove popular (both in Fareham and elsewhere). Even I like the (empty) rhetoric. In a Conservative Party in which many of the recent quasi-“big beasts” are or soon will be gone (stepped down or chucked out) or discredited (e.g. Liz Truss), Suella Braverman might actually be in a strong position to become leader of whatever rump rabble of Con Party MPs is left, especially with her supposedly (?) anti-immigration, and other, rhetoric.
As to the Jew/Israel aspect, she is married to a Jew (and he certainly sounds like a Zionist, pro-Israel Jew). She has effectively pledged fealty to the Jewish lobby by attending their dinners etc; and now this. She needs to get the Israel lobby and/or Jewish lobby onside if she is going to try for the Con Party leadership.
That might have amused me were I ignorant of the fact, if it is a fact, that Hancock is being paid a hundred grand or more (?) for it…I am presuming…[I just read £45,000; still, not bad].
My assessment of Hancock from 5 years ago: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/09/09/deadhead-mps-an-occasional-series-the-matt-hancock-story/.
“When you look at bloodied children, dead children, how women, old people suffer, how doctors die, and fists clench, and tears well up in your eyes, you can’t say it any other way, but we shouldn’t, we don’t have the right to allow ourselves to be guided by emotions.
We must clearly understand who is really behind the tragedy of the people of the Middle East and other regions of the world. Who organizes deadly chaos, who benefits from it. Today this has become obvious and clear to everyone, the customers act openly and brazenly – it is the ruling elites of the United States and their satellites that are the main beneficiaries of global instability.“
(((“the main beneficiaries“)))…
“Israel set out in theory to destroy Hamas. It is now confronting an increasingly united Islamic world. For the first time in 1,000 years you have the Shiites and Sunnis who are united with one purpose, to STOP Israel. Instead of responding to this the President as he always does is escalating. Netanyahu is betting on this very heavily and believes that Israel together with our military power can prevail. This is a big mistake.“
This is what the supporters of Israel in the UK and elsewhere are supporting, whatever weasel words they may utter.
Incidentally, it was —almost boringly— to be expected that the “human rights specialists”, often Jewish lawyers, in England, almost all seem to have fallen silent; a few are even excusing Israel, while whining at the same time how they feel “afraid” to keep on living here because they saw a Swastika drawn on a wall as they drove past somewhere, or they heard a few chants by Palestinians on TV news reports. What hypocrites (also expected, frankly…).
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
I see that one of parliament’s most fanatically pro-Zionist MPs, Michael Gove, is trying to bring back his utterly demented bill to ban councils and other public bodies from having policies supportive of the boycott, disinvestment and sanctions campaign against the Zionist entity.
That man is a crazed lunatic who wants to repress British civil liberties in favour of a state that isn’t particularly friendly towards our own and which commits war crimes, oppresses a people and has persistently flouted international law since as long ago as 1967.
Some Tory MPs have rightfully condemned his ridiculous legislation including the sane on this topic, Crispin Blunt.
When are the good people of Surrey Heath going to get an MP for Surrey Heath instead of Tel Aviv Central?
LikeLike
John:
Quite.
In fact, a number of Con Party MPs are pushing to criminalize even chants of “from the River to the Sea!” etc. The Jew-Zionists have already destroyed, via System MP puppets (Lab *and* Con) much of the free speech that used to exist in the UK; now they seek to go further. They may be disappointed even if they achieve those ends.
LikeLike
The world’s most eminent scientists who specialise in the area of climate change have a consensus of opinion in saying that climate change IS happening and that a large proportion of it IS due to human activities ie the burning of fossil fuels.
The only people who dispute this are crackpot politicians from lunatic ‘parties’ such as Reform UK and ‘journalists’ writing for increasingly lunatic fringe publications such as the formerly serious Daily Telegraph.
LikeLike
John:
Not so. There is a respectable if minority view as to both its existence and its causation. However, as you know, this is a topic on which we are unlikely to agree.
LikeLike
People in positions of power such as the utterly despicable Rishi Sunak and those who hope to be soon eg Sir Kid Starver are complicit in the Zionist entity’s crimes and should realise they are at risk of [REDACTED]:
https://www.icjpalestine.com
The Zionist state undoubtedly takes heart from pro-Zionist politicians like the two wankers above and the fact they don’t explicitly condemm that state’s actions means that Israel feels emboldened to act increasingly brutally against the Palestinians.
LikeLike
I have never had a high opinion of Suella Braverman and now I have an even lower one.
To my mind, she is a rather thick and bigoted rent a gob with a quasi-fascist disdain/contempt for basic British values of civil liberties which has become increasingly evident since she was appointed to the post eg her rants about Just Stop Oil protestors and now this. As is the case with ALL Tory Home Secretaries since 2010, her incompetence levels are sky high as well.
Those protesting about the current situation have a perfectly valid point of view and should be allowed to express it.
People from ALL ethnicities have been on those marches even some humane Jews. The vast majority of them are civilised, decent people and have no hatred in their hearts at all. What a completely ridiculous not to say grotesquely offensive thing to say!
That phrase of ‘From The River To The Sea’ only expresses the hope that one day Palestine will be an independent state where Jews and Palestinians can live in harmony as they used to do for hundreds of years before the ethnic supremacist ideology of Zionism created the Zionist entity in 1948 and Zionists there began to mistreat and oppress the Palestinians.
Perhaps, Suella should take a look at this website of the Neturei Karta sect of anti-Zionist Ultra-orthodox Jews before she misinterprets phrases like that:
https://www.nkusa.org
Those guys do not have a problem with the phrase. Indeed so much so they have been on these marches in the USA, Canada and here as well.
Also, she should be aware that only fascist ,quasi-fascist or other severely authoritarian countries have Home Secretaries who want to interfere with the operational independence of their police forces. This country used to have Home Secretaries who respected that principle. We need the police to be strictly politically neutral. It should be impossible to discern the poltical opinions of even ordinary police constables let alone senior officers. All governments since Thatcher’s have relentlessly politicised them and it is time this process was put into reverse not added too still further.
LikeLike
John:
The problem is partly that know-nothing young police-people are now allowing their spoonfed personal political/social views to override their proper role and duty.
They have all been on rubbish “training courses” (some actually run by Jew-Zionist troublemakers such as the “CAA” cabal, incredibly), and spout all sorts of half-baked “woke” trash.
Naturally, they find it much easier to be a poundland KGB, sitting in judgment on people’s tweets and blog posts, rather than actually preventing and/or detecting real crime and real criminals.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hear! Hear! Not only that, they are useless due to the current awfully low standards. They have taken lots of females to patrol the streets, a job for which they are unsuitable due to their pathetic physical weakness compared with a man.
I have seen on YT a funny video where two useless female constables tried to arrest a man who just shrugged them off and disappeared running very fast. They did not even attempt to follow him, because they knew he would beat the hell out of them. (LOL)
LikeLike
Moronic and evil New Labour after their absurd, quasi-Marxist hatefest of the police called the Macpherson Report in 1999 abolished height restrictions so as to enable the recruitment of more ethnics into police forces and more women.
That infamous report and its ridiculous measures is one reason we have so many five foot nothings in the police and so many females many of whom are not very effective at their job.
There was a perfectly valid reason for those height restrictions. Put simply, a male police officer of 6 foot tall is more likely to appear more intimidating/authoritative to criminals than a five foot female.
LikeLike
Peterborough is a traditionally fairly marginal seat and as such Labour are in a strong position to win it.
Also, there are quite a few Muslims there who will be voters in many cases in his seat. Around the time of the evil Bliar creature’s war in Iraq a young white lad got racially murdered by some local Muslims.
These kind of events surrounding the Zionist state always raise tensions. Thanks to decades of non controlled immigration events abroad can cause racial tensions/problems at home. We have little alternative other than to be more thoughtfull when formulating foreign policy thanks to ‘diversity’.
This is another reason why we should be more careful than to automatically follow the US in its foreign policy. The USA has few muslims compared to us.
LikeLike
I have to ask:
1) What the hell is Hancock doing on a TV series?
2) What kind of programme/show is that? With him, it must be rubbish!
LikeLike
Claudius:
Making money (£45,000+).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAS:_Who_Dares_Wins
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAS:_Who_Dares_Wins#Series_5_(2023)
LikeLike