Diary Blog, 4 October 2024

Afternoon music

[Pushkin Museum, Moscow]

Tweets seen

Britain is crippled because Israel has a fifth column inside the UK.

I noticed when I was a starting-out pupil-barrister over 30 years ago (in London) that the vast majority of criminal defendants, in both the magistrates’ courts and (I think more so) the Crown Courts of the capital (where the more serious crimes in London are tried) were non-white, and that despite the fact that the non-white proportion of the population at the time was only about 10%-20% (indeed, the West Indian and African proportion was perhaps 5%, yet in the court system seemed to be at least half of the defendant-cadre).

David Irving’s thoughts and reminiscences

Some thoughts and reminiscences of David Irving, the famous historian whose works have been repressed, though not entirely successfully, by the Jewish-Zionist element.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Irving [note, though, the now-frequently-seen vandalism of Wikipedia by “the usual suspects”]

https://irvingbooks.com/about-irving-books/

[David Irving]

More tweets seen

If that happens, Iran surely will destroy, or try to destroy, Israel’s greatest targeted weapon by eliminating the Dimona plant(s).

What I find incredible is that the supposedly “racist”, dinosaur-like “reactionary” Con Party membership seems to have no problem with the fact that all 4 of the candidates for leadership are non-white or part-Jewish, and/or are married to Jewish individuals. The members must be very very slow-witted, or at least brainwashed by multikulti propaganda.

The Conservative Party is no longer a British party in any real sense.

Subconsciously, even those most opposed to social-nationalism know that it is, or would be, the right way for European societies to go.

Late music

16 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 4 October 2024”

  1. Yes, the PM of the Zionist state at the time, Begin, allowed his country to sell Exorcet missles to Argentina. Mrs Thatcher was rightly furious and expressed this sentiment to him.

    Despite her faults and regardless of the fact she got on well personally with Jews and represented a constituency with a fairly large number of Jewish voters, Maggie was not averse to standing-up to Zionist fanatics and being critical of Israel at times. It is doubtful whether she would have allowed that virtue signaling nonsense of the Star of David being projected onto No.10 Downing Street as Sunak did.

    Israel is no ally of Britain as its history shows. They have even been known to stab America in the back. About the only country that Israel was a very reliable ally of used to be Apartheid South Africa. Israel helped to supply them with weapons and colloborated with SA on its nuclear weapons programme.

    Like

    1. John:
      More than that. South Africa was developing biological weapons which would only kill members of certain racial or sub-racial groups, basically African blacks. Israel was, I think, given access to that technology and probably now has weapons of that sort, aimed at the Arabs and others. After the fall of apartheid, South Africa gave up the atomic/nuclear weapons technology, and also the biological weapons. Israel and the USA then had all such technology, and retain it. I have no idea whether Russia has it too. Probably.

      Like

  2. Ha, ha, I approve of those aims of New Right Rising. Even the first one would attract a lot of critical comments nowadays let alone the others yet there should be nothing wrong with promoting the nuclear family. Families are the bedrock of succesful societies. Strengthening the family unit should make for strong communities and a strong nation.

    There is evidence to suggest that trying to prevent family breakdown can help to lessen crime rates.

    https://www.c4m.org.uk

    Like

  3. Far too many criminals come from broken homes. The libertarian globalist fake Conservative Party has encouraged this trend by making divorce too easy.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Tory members are under the mistaken impression their calamity in the general election was because the party was perceived as being ‘too Right-wing’. No, it was due to many years of ignoring or treating issues such as immigration with disdain or just paying lip service to them.

    As a result, socially conservative/national-conservative minded people think of the party as being ‘the rich man’s Liberal Democrats’ and thus turned away from them in considerable numbers.

    Like

    1. John:
      The old Conservative Party was a broad church. I think that what has happened is that *both* the more socially-liberal supporters/voters have abandoned it *and* also the more reactionary or (and/or) nationalistic people. Ebb of support from *both* sides, and then also from the mass of voters who quite accurately saw the 14 years of Con government as less and less competent, i.e, incapable of governing at all.

      Like

  5. Wanting to cuddle-up to the Zionist state at every opportunity as Robert Jenrick does in such an embarrssing way is no way to improve the party’s prospects especially as that state now has a record 70% disapproval rating amongst the British public.

    Even liberal globalist leaders such as Edward Heath would have refrained from showing too much admiration or support of the Zionist entity.

    Like

    1. John:
      Edward Heath was at heart a globalist but he never kow-towed to Israel or its Jewish lobby despite the fact that Heath *was* actually generally pro the Jewish lobby.

      Like

  6. What I find incredible is that their members willingly gave us Boris The Buffoon instead of Jeremy Hunt. Now, Hunt is a globalist, metro liberal but one does need to recognise he has some governing ability and would be credible as a party leader. Hunt would have pushed through Brexit even though he was a Remainer.

    Voting for Boris and installing him as party leader and PM was always going to end in tears as many outside the party and within warned would happen. Boris trashed the party ‘brand’ and that will take a longtime to fully recover from.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. John:
      A few (like me, to be immodest) saw “Boris”-idiot for what he was as far back as around 2003; most did not. The msm puffed him to the heights, all about his supposed brilliance and knowledge etc. Only the few, such as me, saw that he was peddling fool’s gold to the plebs.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. The fact that Boris was seen by many as a reliable, honest person is proof of the stupidity of the masses, always gullible and ready to believe the lies of the MSM. I remember seeing him for the first time when he was appointed Foreign Secretary and I could not believe it, even my wife who is not into politics said: “I cannot believe this clown is the new Foreign Secretary”

        Like

  7. Regarding your last comment about social-nationalism I remember a Spanish comrade saying something very similar to what you wrote; he said: “Deep down most decent people are, without realizing it, national-socialists; they yearn for something better, noble and heroic”

    Like

  8. Hello there! Here is an interesting video bringing back to life some historical figures with the help of AI. The quality of the reconstructions is uneven but in general I believe they are very good and fairly impressive. In my opinion the best ones are: Margaret de Valois, Napoleon´s son, better known as the Duke of Reichstadt, Sebastian, the King of Portugal, the Moroccan envoy to the court of Elizabeth I, Marie Mancini, the beautiful niece of Mazarino and (last but not least) Shelley. What do you think?

    Like

Leave a reply to claudius1889 Cancel reply