Afternoon music
Tweets seen
“My opinion is that Mark Lewis of Patron Law is a seriously dodgy solicitor who should be struck off. The basis of that opinion is that Lewis continued to advise the defendants in my case after he identified a conflict between him and the defendants. Example: Lewis wrote the closing speech at trial for one of the defendants. The judge thought he was hearing from the defendant, but he was really hearing from Lewis. And hearing from Lewis six months after he came off the court record. What worries me is the Solicitors Regulation Authority and Lewis’ partners at Patron Law know Lewis’ conduct is appallingly bad, but they are not taking action to stop him.“
[James Wilson]
As far as the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority is concerned, it will only take action once an official complaint has been laid. Posting on Twitter/X may alert some members of the public to Lewis’s fraudulent and/or negligent behaviour, but will not in itself get the SRA to act.
Regular readers of the blog will know that I have repeatedly written about Lewis’s fakery, dishonesty, and negligence. Lewis started both to attack me on Twitter openly and also to conspire covertly with others of the UK Jewish lobby to make malicious complaints against me around 2012— complaints to the Bar Standards Board, complaints to the police, complaints to the Crown Prosecution Service. About 12 years of malicious behaviour.
Lewis is or was prominent in both “UK Lawyers for Israel” [UKLFI”] and the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”], both in effect volunteer arms of the Israeli state and Israeli Embassy in London.
See also:
Not “much of it“— all of it, if you include births to immigrant mothers, and births to English/British women impregnated by non-whites.
All part of the attempt by System scribblers, talking heads and political figures to bamboozle the British people and, in effect, brainwash them into accepting the multikulti society as normal and/or inevitable.
However, Matt Goodwin is really part of the “controlled opposition”, along with Farage, Reform UK etc. Pro-Israel, pro-Jewish lobby etc. You have to consider why the Daily Mail and mainstream TV find Goodwin acceptable when (for example) I would not be, and when (for example) Nick Griffin is or was not acceptable.
Out of millions of Ukrainians now living outside Ukraine, only 196 are foolish enough to want to be cannon-fodder for the Kiev regime.
What matters, though, is not how many missiles reached the target, but what damage was done, particularly to planes and to command and control installations. We do not know.
…because the Zelensky regime in Kiev is primarily Jewish-Zionist.
The Hamas incursion into southern Israel/Palestine a year ago resulted in the death of some 1,200 Israeli Jews; several hundred of which were in or connected to the armed forces or security organizations of Israel.
There is also the point that a great many of the Israelis killed seem to have been killed by “friendly fire”, by the armed forces of the Israeli state itself.
The Israeli retaliatory incursion into Gaza has so far killed some 42,000 Gazans. Over 100,000 others have been injured, a great number (about 22,500) with very severe injuries such as or requiring amputations. The majority of the killed and injured have been civilians (i.e. not Hamas personnel), and most of the killed and injured have been women and children.
One has to ask, at what point will the Israeli Jews —and those in countries such as the UK— consider that they have had their revenge? To talk about “a pound of flesh” etc scarcely covers the reality of somewhere around 150,000 people killed or injured. Already the bare proportion is about 1:140. 140 Gazans to every Israeli.
More tweets
The aim for Europe must be to create a foundation or basis for a higher type of society based (as it must be) on a higher race-type. That, in turn, can provide the basis for a future quantum leap in evolution, a “super-race” if you like.
Wikipedia is infested with vandalism. A couple of years ago, the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” advertised openly, on its own website, for Jews with Wikipedia accounts to collaborate with the “CAA” in “editing” (vandalizing) Wikipedia.
A doomed society.
That has been obvious from the start.
That is the obvious way forward.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
So Tom Tugendhart is out. Of course, it goes without saying, I am not on his idelogical wavelength but he could have had some credibility as an Opposition Leader and might have prevented some Tories going to the Liberal Democrats. They will be pleased he is out.
Now, we are left with dull as ditchwater, no ideas man, a bit thick, James Cleverly (Thickerly), the slightly more intelligent but mad as a box of frogs, self-satisfied, libertarian globalist, anti-‘woke’ (whatever that supposed to be in practice) obesssed with transexuals warrior, I will take your usually needed maternity pay away (so much for once being the ‘party of the family’) Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick.
It is Robert Jenrick or bust. He is far from ideal but the other two are simply not credible in anyway. Labour will be delighted as will Reform UK if either of those get the job.
LikeLike
John:
I find not one of them “credible” but, of the three, Cleverly (precisely because he *is* a bit thick and is not really ideological) would appeal more to the voters than the Nigerian (married to a Jew banker), Kemi Badenoch (who thinks herself so very clever and educated) or the too-obviously “fake and on the make” Jenrick (also married to a Jewish individual, of course).
LikeLike
Badenoch is not credible. All I have ever heard from her apart from her disdain for maternity pay are rants about ‘woke’ people and transexuals. Transexuals are 0.5% of the population and so-called ‘gender ideology’ is a problem the TORY Party created when it needlessly legalised gay ‘marriage’ thereby making marriage a genderless institution. If you effectively remove gender differences in society like that then you will encourage more people to think they are men/boys when they are women/girls and vice versa. This ‘gender ideology’ has only arisen in this country and around the world since gay ‘marriage’ became legal. Before, it was practically non existent. If she wants to be genuinely credible on ‘wokeness’ and gender ideology then she will need to be in favour of restoring the traditional definition of marriage.
If James Cleverly gets the job he will probably have to be removed within about two years. Thickerly is basically continuity Sunak but without the merest hint of competence.
All in all, the Conservative Party is not a serious political party nowadays.
LikeLike
I can see where you are coming from. Kemi would be a worse choice than Cleverly. As you say, Cleverly is thick and has no real ideas ie a dull managerial type but not seriously offensive on a personal level. A characterless, non ideological nobody.
Kemi, on the other hand, is a loose cannon and shoots from the hip where she thinks she is being very clever but actually is not. She is arrogant and a know it all. She will rub the public up the wrong way. All she ever does is rant about ‘wokeness’ yet I have yet to hear her actually define what it amounts to exactly. Her other ‘ideas’ amount to libertarian extremist, unworkable rubbish like getting rid of or reducing to a pittance maternity pay which is something she wouldn’t need but many ordinary mothers would and hardly conducive to increasing our national birthrate which is better than replacement migration.
I have heard her refer to David Tennant’s ethnicity with regard to his criticism of her for her anti trans/anti-‘woke’ comments. Was there any need for that? I think not. Snide, anti-white comments should not be found in any political leader let alone someone who wishes to lead what was once, in the distant past, rightfully called the Conservative Party.
If Tory members elect her they will regret it very soon.
LikeLike
John:
The biggest bloc in British politics will soon be the utterly disillusioned and/or very angry. In fact, it already is. Look at GE 2024. 8 out of 20 eligible voters did not vote. A plurality of eligible voters did not vote.
As you know, the “winning” “landslide” Labour Party only had 4 votes out of every 20 possible.
How many of those 8 non-voters were unable to feel or give support for the parties standing (rather than being too lazy or apathetic to bother) is unknown, but I would think the majority, if not vast majority. At a guess, at least 6 out of the 8.
The situation at present is that both “main parties”, the System parties, added together, muster only about 50%-55% of the opinion polls, as of this week.
LikeLike
Best bet for them will be to have Cleverly for two years then remove him when he fails as he will and then try and find a real ‘normal’ Tory who doesn’t have a massive, utterly weird fetishism for the Zionist terror state. There must be one such individual out there, surely?
LikeLike
John:
The Zionist lobby would quickly remove or block the path of any MP thought to be anti-Jew or anti-Zionist. It was not always so, and in the past some who were independent in practice (albeit pro-Jew, pro-Israel overall) such as Mrs Thatcher and Edward Heath, were able to become PM. Not now, I think. There has been a step-change in this country since 1989, in various ways, one of which has been the huge growth of influence and power of the Jew-Zionist lobby, connected with “their” influence over the mass media.
I of course have no time for the Conservative Party anyway, in terms of actually supporting it at all. For me, both main System parties are enemies.
LikeLike
The national turnout was 60%, was it not? Appallingly bad though still a tiny bit higher than in 2001 and 1918 but then that is what you should expect when you have a profoundly undemocratic, archaic, unfit for purpose, stand alone First Past The Post electoral system instead of Proportional Representation like modern, democratic states such as Germany, Denmark, Sweden and New Zealand have. Our system ‘wastes’ MILLIONS of votes at each so-called ‘general election’ so it is no wonder so many feel there is absolutely no point in voting.
Unrig the system by changing it to PR then more people will vote. In Denmark, their turnouts are regularly in the 80% plus range.
https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk
LikeLike
John:
59.8%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Kingdom_general_election
For me, the point is not that x-number of votes are wasted by FPTP, but more that the present system of voting tends to install useless governments. After all, the point of voting is supposedly to install governments capable of governing properly. Salus populi suprema lex esto.
LikeLike
That is why FPTP tends to install useless governments. As FPTP wastes millions of votes small parties with innovative ideas get crushed by the system before they have a chance to gain decent levels of MPs. Political diversity of ideas is smashed by the system.
The big parties can be complacent and still have many MPs just by gaining the loyalty of small numbers of voters.
LikeLike
Meanwhile, half decent Tory leaders of the past such as Chamberlain and Stanley Baldwin are spinning in their graves like crazy. How did the once mighty Conservative Party come to this?
Have they not got a Donald Trump or J.D Vance on the backbenches?
LikeLike
John:
God forbid! Still, I hear what you say…
Mediocrity rules, it seems.
LikeLike
J.D Vance would make for a good Tory leader. Of Scotch-Irish descent ie from Ulster, he is like a less impulsive and thoughtful Trump. He did well in that Vice Presidential debate and performed better than Trump did in his one.
LikeLike
Stanley Baldwin lent his name to a campaign to let lots of (((REDACTED refugees))) into the UK. The campaign was called “The Lord Baldwin Fund For Refugees.”
Baldwin was a traitor just like Churchill and every Prime Minister since.
The best that can be said about him is that he wasn’t quite as treasonous as his successors.
As the power of the (((REDACTEDS))) increases, the level of groveling, servility, and obsequiousness that (((they))) can demand, likewise increases exponentially.
The traitor politicians of yesteryear (Churchill, Baldwin, Thatcher, etc) were traitors, but not at the same level of the traitors of today.
Whether that is because the past politicians were slightly less treasonous, or because the (((REDACTEDS))) had less power to make demands, is up for debate.
But the (((REDACTEDS))) would not have dared to demand that Churchill or MacMillan erect a holocaust memorial next to parliament.
As the power of the (((REDACTEDS))) over society increases, the blatant groveling of the traitor politicians also increases.
Even Blair and (((Cameron))) never dared to say that (((REDACTED))) stars should be put over every entrance to the UK, as the arch-traitor Robert Jenrick is demanding.
In the past, when the (((REDACTEDS))) had less power over society, (((they))) had to be more “reasonable” with (((their))) demands.
But now that (((their))) supremacy over UK society is almost complete, (((they))) can demand anything (((they))) want, and the traitor politicians will do it.
Hence you have the arch-traitor Starmer bragging that he will force every British student to have holocaust guilt as an integral part of their identity.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
I cannot fault what you say.
LikeLike
The Zionist terror state is evil. Netanhayu and his henchmen are basically the spawn of Satan. It would be good to see it nuked though, sadly, that would mean more Palestinians would die and also the few, decent, devoutly religious, Ultra-orthodox Jews there who are anti-Zionist and who live in places like Mea Shearim in Jerusalem. Still, at least a major threat to Middle East and World peace would be removed.
LikeLike
John:
For several reasons, I should not support that, though it may well happen, if not in 2024 then later.
I also cannot agree that the “black hat” Jews are on a higher moral plane than the majority. It is mostly those ones who insult and even spit at Western (Christian) tourists in Jerusalem (usually about 10 of them attack one European, usually a woman).
LikeLike
Only the most radical and fringe fundamentalist ones have been known to do that. You do get fundamentalist loonies in every religion. Even the ‘Spawn of Satan’ himself, Netanhayu, has seen fit to sharply criticise them.
LikeLike
I have a better solution to nuking the Zionist terror state. Either we make it a British mandate again or the state is peacefully dismantled and Jews can live there without Israeli citizenship and thereby return to being Palestinian Jews and live there peacefully as they used to do alongside Palestinians before the Zionist National Socialist (Nazi) expansionist (lebensraum) and domineering philosophy got a grip on too many Jews there.
What is there not to like? The Zionist state will also cease to be a worldwide hub for nefarious Zionist activities.
LikeLike
John:
Good idea (which will never happen).
LikeLike
They are when it comes to the Palestinians. Unlike the Zionist loony ones many of whom are settlers from places like Brooklyn, the ‘black hat brigade’ ones mostly want to live in peace with the Palestinians as they used to do at the time of the British mandate.
The expansionist, domineering, ultra-nationalist political philosophy of Zionism is the problem not Judaism.
LikeLike
John:
Not sure that that is so, but I do not know enough detail to argue the point.
LikeLike
Viva Palestine! Palestine will be free and Jews and Palestinians can live there together in peace once Zionism ends.
LikeLike