Morning music
Tweets seen
Those two fanatical Jew-Zionist organizations have largely-overlapping memberships, and work in concert.
I am unsure as to whether that tweet by one Fahad Ansari is true or not. I have been unable, at this time, to find any confirmation. Will clarify as and when.
Incidentally, the “CAA” tweet is itself mistaken, in that it describes Franck Magennis as “an officer of the court“. Magennis is, I now see (I think I was unaware of his existence until today or yesterday), a barrister: https://gardencourtchambers.co.uk/barrister/franck-magennis/.
Solicitors are, by statute, “officers of the court“; barristers are not. The distinction arises out of the historical background, going back hundreds of years, of the two main branches of the legal profession in England and Wales.
A few of my own experiences of “CAA” and “UKLFI” activity:
…and take a look at the case of Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased) and Cantor (use the blog search box).
The now-washed-up self-promoting Jew-Zionist fanatic and solicitor, Mark Lewis, involved in James Wilson’s case, was and I think still is a prominent member or supporter of both the “CAA” and the “UKLFI”, at one time prominently featured on the website of the “CAA”.
Lewis is currently quite likely facing (not for the first time) both disciplinary action by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA), and legal action by at least one former client (on grounds that may include professional negligence and civil fraud).
Simon Myerson, barrister based at Leeds, and briefly a Recorder (p/t judge), whose vituperative behaviour on social media led to his effective dismissal from the Bench after a few months, and who (I believe) may face action from the Bar Standards Board, is involved in or supportive of both UKLFI and the CAA, and was a witness (whose sworn testimony was disbelieved and/or given no weight by the trial judge) in the James Wilson defamation case. Again, for more about that, see the search box on the blog.
Having now read a little about that barrister, Magennis, it seems that he is very far from my viewpoint, ideologically, but we have both been attacked by the Jew-Zionist orgs “CAA” and “UKLFI”. Sadly, in this complex world, my enemy’s enemy is not necessarily my friend…
More tweets
https://twitter.com/wissamshabat/status/1958770361899892877
Victim of yet another Israeli war crime.
According to the “CAA” and other Jew-Zionist orgs, anything up to 96% of UK-resident Jews support Israel in anything it does.
Anyone giving support to Israel is, thereby, to some extent complicit in its crimes.
As police fly-on-wall TV show voiceovers always say, “it’s all kicking off“…
Quite likely, and the Labour Party still has about 300,000 members (though dropping rapidly), so that might add up to 75,000 or more people, which would be fairly significant; however, the 28% figure refers to members, not voters.
The Labour Party membership, especially the activists who are or were the core of that party, were always far more radical than Labour voters . A small number of people, really.
I still think that Corbyn will struggle to achieve a national vote (assuming that his new party can even fight many seats) above 5%.
Most English white people will not vote for Corbyn, who actually seems to want more migrant-invaders to arrive (and to give them even more than they currently get by way of housing, food, pocket-money, services).
It may be that some young English/Welsh/Scottish voters, as well as some ethnic minority voters, may be attracted by an anti-Israel message, as well as by a pro-Welfare State, pro-NHS etc message, and a generally pro-multikulti orientation. Some but (in my opinion) not enough to win many seats. Corbyn seems to be in George Galloway territory, more or less.
I think that Corbyn and his candidates may be able to win in a few particular seats, including that of Corbyn himself, but I doubt that the number of seats won would be more than three or four, if that.
Only a minority, a small minority, of seats look like remaining Labour anyway; maybe 150. Corbyn’s “sales pitch” would be to a fraction of that minority of seats. As said, probably far fewer than a dozen; quite likely, well under half a dozen.
In fact, it is an open question as to whether even Zara Sultana, Corbyn’s deputy, will retain her seat (at Coventry South). As a Labour candidate, she got over 47% of the vote in 2024, but next time that vote will be split between her and the new Labour candidate. Also, the Conservative vote in 2024 was nearly 24%, and the Reform UK vote over 13%. If the Con vote collapses further, Reform might get a vote, on that basis alone, of 30%+.
In 2019, the Con candidate got 42.5% of the vote, Labour (Ms. Sultana) only slightly more (43.4%). Brexit Party got 3%.
In both 2019 and 2024, the Con Party put up the same candidate, an Englishwoman, I believe. She nearly won in 2019.
Add to those factors the disaffected 2024 Lab voters deciding to cast their lot for Reform in 2028 or 2029, and one could easily see Reform getting over 40% at Coventry South, with official Labour and Ms. Sultana sharing 30%-40% between them. Exit Ms. Sultana?…
Talking point
National Socialism, Communism, and other radical movements did not, and do not, come out of nowhere.
Incidentally, note the facial features of the “Bonzos” there.
Actually, thinking about it, does that not bear at least a certain passing resemblance to the UK in 2025?
Talking point
The reality of 1930s Germany. Very different from the usual (((propaganda))) seen in the “Western” msm…
More tweets seen
In fact, here I stand somewhere in the middle. As society is now, not in 1800, or 1900, or 1960, there is a problem with —usually quite mediocre, at best— people inheriting, in some cases, tens of millions, in some cases hundreds or even thousands of millions. We all know the more newsworthy names— McCartney, Beckham, Jagger etc, but there are many others not so prominent in the gossip columns or even the financial pages. Some have wealth far beyond that bestowed upon popular music people, footballers etc, and/or their offspring.
Personally, I think it acceptable for people to inherit a modest amount, arguably up to £1M, but not £10M, certainly not £100M, £1BN or more.
This is a difficult and complex question once you get beyond simple cases. There are knotty questions of landed estates, trusts, tax avoidance offshore etc. A near-confiscatory tax regime is hard to enforce in anything approaching a free society. What I do not agree with is the out-of-hand dismissal seen in Matt Goodwin’s tweeted comment. The question or questions should be addressed.
There are, at present, only two serious contenders re. the next UK general election—Reform UK and Labour.
[“Several generations have perished”: a horrifying number of losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine revealed From a recent leak of military documents, it became known that the Armed Forces of Ukraine have lost more than 1.7 million people since the start of the full-scale conflict with Russia, writes MWM. The death rate of Ukrainian conscripts is very high, and in areas with intense combat, the life expectancy of servicemen sometimes amounts to only four hours. The Armed Forces of Ukraine suffered especially heavy losses during the invasion of the Kursk region, as they were encircled by Russian troops who attacked from several sides simultaneously. Against the backdrop of this news, more and more supporters of the regime in Kyiv are saying that Ukraine is on the verge of complete military defeat.“]
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
I have seen the limited number of polls involving Corbyn’s new party on Wikipedia’s UK polling page for the next rigged ‘election’. Depending upon how the question is phrased it could get up to 15%. That highest figure mentions Zara Sultana as a co-leader and therefore possibly attracting more Muslim voters than when Jeremy Corbyn is said to be the only leader.
Most polls put the party as having only up to 10% support with the latest one at 6%. I think those figures are in the right ballpark. Germany’s hard-left, pro mass immigration party called Die Linke (The Left) does not get more than 11%.
https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk
https://X.com/MakeVotesMatter
LikeLike
John:
Of course, and as you know, 10% of support does not mean 10% of seats in the UK; it may even mean 0% seats. Even 15% does not guarantee one seat. Look at UKIP in 2015.
LikeLike
Indeed. British ‘democracy’ always was one of the biggest lies in world history as that sick joke of a result in 2015 and numerous previous ones eg the SDP/Liberal Alliance getting 25% of the vote and only 3% or so of the seats compared to Labour with 209 seats and 27% vote share in 1983’s farcical general ‘election’ proves and since then even the tiny bit of ‘democracy’ we are alloeed to have ie free speech and peaceful assembly has come under sustained attack.🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬😢😢😢
LikeLike
Yes, an electoral system so out of date you CAN’T cast an explicit vote for a party but only for an individual local candidate in your own seat. In effect, this means we do NOT have NATIONAL ie REAL general elections but more like 650 mini ‘general’ elections held on the same day.
Stand alone, ‘pure’ First Past The Post would only be appropriate for an electoral system at the NATIONAL level if there were just two parties in the country with just two candidates standing in each seat as many seats still had in the ‘election’ of 1970 or if every candidate was an independent.
Otherwise, FPTP should only be used to provide for a ‘constituency link’ in a mixed-member Proportional Representation system as Germany and New Zealand use.
LikeLike
They will possibly get up to 15 seats at the next election. No doubt their biggest successes will come in seats which are deprived and have large numbers of muslim voters. Most, if not all, of those muslim independent MPs will join it. Those victories were the least remarked upon by so-called ‘in touch’ political commentators and were more significant in a way than Reform UK’s wins since they represented the first real stirrings of Islamist influence in our politics. This new party will be part of that trend.
LikeLike
We’re Your Firing Squad | Blackadder Goes Forth
A reminder of when British comedy really was funny.
https://youtu.be/3WHSkbM9zAU?si=VQNtP0Wv8i0_E6nO
LikeLike
An interesting and, at the same time, painful reminder of how wonderful Europe was before 1939. Although the video is about Germany in 1937, all across the Western world, most people dressed smartly and behaved correctly; in other words, as White people used to be.
Real life in Nazi Germany [UNCENSORED]
LikeLike
Claudius:
Thank you. Just watching it. I may put it on the blog.
LikeLike
Yes! I have noticed a strange similarity in the faces of the “fat cats” 😁😁😁 The look familiar and disgusting… 🤮🤮
LikeLike
Jeremy Corbyn. Are there really so many people in the UK who hate the rich?
https://x.com/jeremycorbyn/status/1958800272823652553
LikeLike
There probably are. Some ‘Right-wing’ economic policies make sense such as not having an excessive burden of taxes on ANY section of the population and also some ‘left-wing’ economic policies also can be sensible such as the government not being totally uninvolved in the running of the economy and therefore being willing to intervene occasionally and to ‘guide’ economic development such as Japan’s government did from the 1950’s to 1970’s to create their economic miracle. South Korea’s government did this too with a similar outcome. Also, the government in Japan used selective and carefully targeted economic protectionism using tariffs/import quotas to build-up ‘national economic champion’ industries and firms like Toyota, Honda, Sony ect. Economic interventionist policies like that are thought to be ‘leftwing’.
I think most people in this country and in most Western democracies are pragmatic and non ideological about economic matters and just want to see any policies which can produce the greatest amount of national wealth to be shared reasonably fairly amongst the majority of people.
LikeLike
Jeremy Corbyn and other hard lefties need to be told what one of Mrs Thatcher’s favourite economists once said. The Jewish one called Milton Friedman said you can have a welfare state or you can have continual mass immigration but you CAN NOT have both at the same time. A choice has to be made so if you favour a welfare state and most people do then you need to prevent excessive foreign immigration putting a big burden on it. In short, you need to be a welfare chauvinist as some of the nationalist parties on the Continent are.
LikeLike
JC is 76 years old now, way too old to be aiming at the PM’s job. He lacks a spine and has no fire in him.
LikeLike
JC is not only pretty old to be a party leader he is also not as bright as he thinks he is. He, like most hard lefties, celebrates and makes a cause celebre out of the Battle of Cable Street with its alleged ‘defeat’ of Sir Oswald Mosley and his BUF party but he does not acknowledge openly that Zionist/Jewish Supremacist extremists were to the forefront of that disgraceful episode of anti-BUF and anti-police thuggery and they are the SAME kind of people that organised a veritable hate campaign against him and other pro-Palestinian people on the Left for daring to speak-up for the Palestinians with their ever so predictable smears of ‘anti-semitism’ when it was really in his and Mosley’s case anti-Zionism/anti Jewish Supremacism.
Why give credit to the kind of vicious and unfair people who helped to lose you your job of party leader and give your party a resounding defeat at the ballot box?
LikeLike
The real dividing lines in politics come from issues like immigration, law and order ie whether people are in favour of the death penalty or not, some LGBT rights ect. Foreign and defence policy can often rouse passions and create real ideological differences.
LikeLike
Inheritance tax could be hiked for the very richest but there is no sense or justice in having a rate of 100%. Why shouldn’t supposedly free citizens in an alleged democracy be allowed to pass on some of their wealth to their own flesh and blood?
We need to get away from this infantile belief the Labour Party in particular has that people who are not earning a wage as their beloved ‘workers’ they keep-on and on ranting about are not contributing at all to the economy.
Large numbers of very rich people do not work and live off investment income from share dividends. Now, if that is invested in British companies their money IS helping our economy.
Infact, it could be an idea to have a variable rate of Capital Gains Tax whereby the government says to rich people if you invest your money in the shares of British companies particularly if they are in emerging industries like bio technology, artificial intelligence ect we will cut your ratecof Capital Gains Tax but if you, instead, put your capital into the shares of foreign companies we will raise it.
LikeLike
If anyone defends the Zionist state now knowing what the world does after the a year and a few months then, frankly, they are evil, ignorant filth. Apartheid South Africa was the great pariah state from the 1960’s to the 1990’s but the National Party government there was no where near as bad as the devil in human form Netanhayu and his cabinet. Israel is carrying-out a confirmed genocide which SA never did and futhermore, SA’s government did at least start setting aside large areas of the land area of the country as black ruled ‘homelands’. Israel, in contrast, builds Zionist settlements all over the West Bank depriving the Palestinians of any real chance of their own state ect. Israel also consistently breaks international law with utter contempt for the rest of the world. Apartheid SA did not. Also, unlike SA, the Zionist entity is frequently very agressive towards its neighbours.
LikeLike