Tag Archives: Foreign Office Research Department

Diary Blog, 14 May 2023, with items about John Osborne, Anatoly Golitsyn, and the Russia-China rapprochement

From the newspapers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-12080849/PETER-HITCHENS-impoverish-nation-help-poor-world.html

“Labour, as we know from the blurted revelations of the Blairite functionary Andrew Neather, actually wanted to change the character of the country. The Tories wanted lots of cheap labour, and didn’t care if it changed the country. The policy continues. I doubt that the latest law on migration will make much difference.

Lord Green of Deddington – a measured former diplomat who deals in hard fact – mordantly pointed this out during last Thursday’s debate in the House of Lords. He said: ‘The Government have actively encouraged large-scale economic migration,’ and produced clear evidence of this.

He warned: ‘The current scale of immigration, of which asylum is only a small part, simply cannot be allowed to continue. The pressure on our schools and public services is heavy and increasing. We already have to build… nearly 300 homes every single day just to house immigrant families.’

[Peter Hitchens, in the Daily Mail]

[should be captioned “MIGRANT INVADERS”]

Naturally, the pro-immigration careerists and “useful idiots” will display the details of some “refugee” brain surgeon or scientist, maybe one single individual out of every thousand.

John Osborne

“Given a platform to express his views in the 1957 anthology Declaration, he took the opportunity to criticize monarchy:

I have called Royalty religion the ‘national swill’ because it is poisonous… the leader-writers and the bribed gossip mongers have only to rattle their sticks in the royalty bucket for most of their readers to put their heads down in this trough of Queen-worship… My objection to the Royalty symbol is that it is dead; it is the gold filling in a mouthful of decay.[67]

[Wikipedia]

Polemical, but he had a point.

More from Osborne:

Critics saw a conservative attitude to empire reflected in West of Suez,[41][36][45] and later in the 1970s he expressed support for Enoch Powell;[76] in the words of Osborne’s biographer Michael Ratcliffe, “he drifted to the libertarian, unorganized right”.[69] Several commentators have argued that a conservative and nostalgic strain was apparent in Osborne’s work from an early stage.[77][52][76] As early as 1968, in an interview with Kenneth Tynan, he had declared himself “a patriot in the sense that my life only has meaning here, not somewhere else. This sort of spurious internationalism, where people respond to one another across nations and continents — it seems to me very unreal.[47]

[Wikipedia]

I am warming to his words, especially after the pathetic “Conservative Democracy” “conference” (about 100 people), at Bournemouth yesterday, had an even more pathetic knot of pro-“refugee” (migrant-invader) protesters (about 3 or 4) outside the “conference”. They were there, apparently, to support non-existent “climate refugees”.

The unreality has now permeated all levels, from mainstream System political parties (look at the last few Prime Ministers— Sunak, Liz Truss, Boris-idiot, Theresa May) to tiny groups on all sides, even the British nationalist side in some cases.

Tweets seen

…and do not forget that millions of “me too” idiots promoted the facemask nonsense, including many many “healthcare professionals” such as doctors. Those who realized the nonsense was nonsense mostly kept quiet to protect their jobs and money.

Interesting but, if the KGB was so cunning, why was it unable to save the Soviet Union itself? The collapse of “the West” may be in train, but that of the “socialist” world already happened, starting (arguably) in 1989.

Not that that means that Bezmenov was completely wrong.

Defectors have to sell something, usually either “secrets” or some kind of analysis of events. cf. Golitsyn [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoliy_Golitsyn].

As for Bezmenov himself, he died in Canada at the early age of 53: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Bezmenov.

Talking about Golitsyn, his stock was low for decades. I recall discussing the matter in the early/mid1980s, after dinner with a senior member of the (British) Foreign Office research apparat. It was at his home in Blackheath (London), and was a merely social invitation via one of his daughters.

The FO man was dismissive of Golitsyn and, after a couple of his excellent aged Scotch whiskies, emphatically so. I had, at the time, the bad habit of playing devil’s advocate or advocatus diabolus

All the same, while the Soviet and Chinese communists may not have expressly plotted together to deceive the West about the Sino-Soviet split [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoliy_Golitsyn#Controversies], look at what is now happening— what looks very like a slowly-emerging Russia-China rapprochement against NATO/NWO.

Slightly alternatively, a Russia-China rapprochement combined with a strategy of undermining the West not only militarily but also in financial and commercial areas; weakening the dollar as the default world currency, and bypassing the financial centres of the USA, UK, and EU.

Sometimes, ideas may not become official policy yet have unexpected effects later, down the line. An example of that would be the Helsinki Accords of 1975 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helsinki_Accords].

Many saw them as meaningless, an example of the Soviet Union “fooling” the West. That may well have been the intention of the Soviet leadership. However, the dissidents in Russia and the Baltic states, Czechoslovakia etc, used the superficially “paper” agreements to push for liberalization of the whole socialist system in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. The rest is history.

Also, speculating philosophically a little, I think that, once an idea has passed through even one human mind, it has incalculable effects down the line.

A somewhat similar idea (re. Helsinki etc) was behind the episode of The Sandbaggers (for me, one of the very best spy story series on TV) called My Name is Anna Wiseman.

I confess that, when I first saw that episode, I thought it rather far-fetched. I thought the same, more or less, about Andrei Amalrik’s Will the Soviet Union Survive until 1984?, which I first read sometime in the early 1980s. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Amalrik]. In both cases, I was (at least partly) wrong. Sometimes, life can be very surprising. I have found that.

More tweets seen

Not only to “Ukraine” (the Kiev regime), but also to Israel:

The Jewish lobby in America captured Congress decades ago. The same is true, to a large extent, of the House of Commons in the UK.

I wonder how long it will be before the first nuclear missiles explode in or over Western Europe, and where they will be exactly. In the UK, for example. Faslane? Chicksands? London?

I myself live only about 20 miles from a major likely target area (Southampton). Maybe, in the end, the thing to do would be to buy an excellent bottle of Chateau Margaux or, maybe, Chateau d’Yquem, and just accept that one can do nothing to stop the madness.

If the Russians keep getting poked and prodded and, indeed, endangered by the NATO powers (egged on by the “you-know-whos”, as usual), this can only end one way.

I recall that, when I was living in the South West of the UK, ~20 years ago, a large amount of cocaine was discovered by a dog walker or the like on the wooded banks of the river Torridge, near Bideford. Obviously left by a small boat at night, probably off a larger ship (this was a couple of miles from the estuary, beyond which is the open sea).

Cannot quite remember the value, but I think it was in the hundreds of thousands, at least.

The finder reported it to the police. What else? After all, even leaving aside moral or legal imperatives, most people would have no idea how to sell such a haul. I certainly would not. I do not take prohibited drugs, and know no-one who does, or who would buy that —or any— amount of them.

Doesn’t take much to scare them, nicht wahr? I wonder where their boltholes are? USA? Canada? UK? France? Australia?

Germans know that their territory might well be the first to be obliterated if a terrible nuclear war were to start.

This is the Jewish comedian before whom the entire “Western” msm and political rabble have bowed down…

Zelensky always looks unwashed to me; frankly rather unclean.

I think that the musicians will beat the comedians…

Do you expect manners from “them”? Don’t expect it, then you will not be disappointed.

Now reverse-engineer it.

“Jack Monroe”, a complete fraud. Amazing that she is still being invited to various festivals, though I think only small ones, and she is still occasionally seen in the mass media. In fact, there are still (as of today) 429 utter mugs each sending her between £3.50 and £44 monthly via Patreon. Those idiots must have cotton wool for brains.

Yes, I know that there are other online “grifters”, such as one “Supertanskiii”, a blond woman who has made a living ranting pointlessly on Twitter about “the Tories” (because fake “Labour” under Starmer would be so much better…oh, no, wait a moment…). “Jack Monroe”, though, is a particularly egregious, and indeed pathological, liar.

That is very restrained.

I blogged about those events several times in 2022. As I guessed, there never was a libel action launched, but “grifter” Jack Monroe pretended for quite a while that there was, and solicited donations from mugs.

In fact, her one-time chosen lawyer, Israel-based self-promoter Mark Lewis (about whom I have also blogged in the past), has not even come out of his kennel on her behalf in the past year, as far as I know.

The further tweets are worth reading.

Late music

Diary Blog, 25 November 2021, including the socio-political misuse of marketing and advertising

Misuse of corporate marketing to pursue a socio-political agenda

There’s a certain kind of business leader who wants to interfere in social and political matters by using corporate funds to pursue an agenda that has nothing to do with the goods or services being sold. The Calvin Klein ad shown is but one example.

Another factor is the influence of socio-politically tendentious advertising and marketing directors. See later below about the once-ubiquitous clothing company, Benetton.

Naturally, the above factors take place under the umbrella of an international or transnational agenda being pursued by secret or semi-secret groups and cabals. In other words, this goes beyond the idiosyncratic views of a few business types.

The racemixing agenda of Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi] (basically, elimination of white Europeans by racemixing with blacks and browns, the resulting mass to be ruled by Jews and part-Jews) is now adopted by powerful interests across the Western world.

In fact, that agenda is now seen all around us. In the UK, practically every TV ad has to have blacks in it, and mixed-race children. I blogged about this deliberate campaign a few years ago: see https://ianrobertmillard.org/2018/12/10/tv-ads-and-soaps-are-the-propaganda-preferred-by-the-system-in-the-uk/.

That has become even more blatant this Christmas.

The same socio-political programme can be detected easily in TV dramas etc. Even the general public is now aware of, and trying to push back against, the tide of trash of that sort. However, such pushback will be unsuccessful. The public has no power; the levers are all controlled by the conspirators, often (though not all) Jewish.

The propaganda noted is not aimed at people of my (middle or late middle) age, not even at younger 30-somethings or 20-somethings; it is aimed at those who are so young that their undeveloped and relatively uncritical brains can be strongly influenced by such material. Children and young teens. The idea is to normalize the idea of mixed-race relationships, marriages, and offspring.

Many will recall the horrible Benetton posters of the 1980s and 1990s: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benetton_Group#Marketing. They were designed by an individual who later stood for election in
Italy on a supposedly radical platform: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliviero_Toscani; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_in_the_Fist.

Did the “controversial” advertising help Benetton itself? Not really. After initial publicity and (largely hostile) public reaction, Benetton faded: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benetton_Group#History.

The Body Shop [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Body_Shop] was another commercial enterprise that mixed selling things with a socio-political agenda. The joint founder, Anita Roddick, copied the Body Shop idea word for word from a shop of the same name in Berkeley, California, and she then made a huge success out of it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Roddick.

My problem with Roddick’s business (in the 1980s) was not its environmental campaigning as such, but the fact that its employees had to subject their own views to those of Roddick, as I understand. For me, in terms of the Threefold Social Order [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_threefolding] concept, that was an example of the economic sphere interfering, and so wrongfully, with the political sphere or “sphere of rights”.

In fact, much of the Anita Roddick Body Shop project was permeated by fakery, though I have no doubt that Roddick believed in much of what she said.

I was once slightly acquainted with the family of a girl from London who told me, when I last encountered her (on a train from Blackheath to London Bridge, sometime in the mid-1980s), that she was going to work in the (then just going to open) Body Shop in Moscow.

The girl’s father was a senior official of the Foreign Office Research Department, who owned a tremendous library of Russian art books, as well as some high-quality Scotch whisky.

The girl had originally wanted to join the same part of the Foreign Office as her father, but the familial connection had apparently made that impossible. I wonder whether she ever did get to Moscow to work, and whether it worked out.

I have in fact just now discovered that Body Shop either did not open in Moscow in the 1980s, or perhaps did open but later closed, perhaps re-opening in 2006: see https://citywire.co.uk/funds-insider/news/russia-ready-for-body-shop-experience/a269320. At any rate, it is there now: https://www.thebodyshop.ru/. Anita Roddick herself died in 2007, at the age of 64, and the Body Shop, less “activist”, is now owned by other interests.

[Update, 6 April 2024: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/apr/05/the-body-shop-debts-suppliers-landlords-trade-creditors-administration].

Reverting to the main point, we see a campaign now, on a wide front, to use (misuse) the vast resources of international business for socio-political propaganda in support of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan and, therefore, some of the aims of “Zionist Occupation Government” [ZOG] and the “New World Order” [NWO].

Late morning music

Tweets seen

https://twitter.com/BritishDeanV51/status/1463620753824309252?s=20

https://twitter.com/Steve_Laws_/status/1463831964537049090?s=20

https://twitter.com/Steve_Laws_/status/1463798820932890624?s=20

https://twitter.com/Steve_Laws_/status/1463778359519940611?s=20

…so that said migrant-invaders can be ferried to the UK…

https://twitter.com/Steve_Laws_/status/1463628089653665800?s=20

https://twitter.com/Steve_Laws_/status/1463617481759678465?s=20

The migration invasion is being excused and indeed facilitated by “refugees welcome” dimwits, and/or politically-tendentious “activists”, and that applies particularly to those in the political and mass media milieux.

That (see above) tweeter, Julia Rampen, is or has been a freelance msm scribbler and talking head, who works now for IMIX, a public relations/pressure group with pro-migration invasion aims.

IMIX has co-signed open letters with other organizations, including one connected with a Clare Moseley. See details about Clare Moseley: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3924505/married-calais-jungle-charity-boss-who-romped-with-toyboy-migrant-fears-for-her-life-after-refugee-lover-tried-to-burn-down-her-hq/; and https://www.civilsociety.co.uk/news/charity-commission-opens-statutory-inquiry-into-refugee-charity.html.

Seems that the often-lax Charity Commission has had to step in.

More about the head of that charity: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/claremoseley

The IMIX organization has this website: https://imix.org.uk/our-funders/. Pretty well-funded…Even “Comic Relief” is funding it.

The “big battalions” are on the side of the invasion and the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. Only we, “we happy few“, stand ready to defend Western civilization.

More music

Historical-architectural video

Interesting in part, despite the tendentious commentary.

More tweets

https://twitter.com/DogswaldMosley/status/1463213140624224257?s=20

Almost all msm scribblers and talking heads are enemies.

Trouble is… Migration Watch, though very measured, very accurate, very respectful of law and established order etc, basically fails to see that this is a transnational conspiracy, and that the “British” Government (the Cabinet of which is now mainly Jewish and/or non-white, non-British) is part of that conspiracy (the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan).

Merely presenting statistics and then expecting a pack of corrupt sinister clowns like the present government to “do the decent thing”, or even the obvious thing, is a complete waste of time.

Video from 1939

Late music