Misuse of corporate marketing to pursue a socio-political agenda
There’s a certain kind of business leader who wants to interfere in social and political matters by using corporate funds to pursue an agenda that has nothing to do with the goods or services being sold. The Calvin Klein ad shown is but one example.
Another factor is the influence of socio-politically tendentious advertising and marketing directors. See later below about the once-ubiquitous clothing company, Benetton.
Naturally, the above factors take place under the umbrella of an international or transnational agenda being pursued by secret or semi-secret groups and cabals. In other words, this goes beyond the idiosyncratic views of a few business types.
The racemixing agenda of Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi] (basically, elimination of white Europeans by racemixing with blacks and browns, the resulting mass to be ruled by Jews and part-Jews) is now adopted by powerful interests across the Western world.
In fact, that agenda is now seen all around us. In the UK, practically every TV ad has to have blacks in it, and mixed-race children. I blogged about this deliberate campaign a few years ago: see https://ianrobertmillard.org/2018/12/10/tv-ads-and-soaps-are-the-propaganda-preferred-by-the-system-in-the-uk/.
That has become even more blatant this Christmas.
The same socio-political programme can be detected easily in TV dramas etc. Even the general public is now aware of, and trying to push back against, the tide of trash of that sort. However, such pushback will be unsuccessful. The public has no power; the levers are all controlled by the conspirators, often (though not all) Jewish.
The propaganda noted is not aimed at people of my (middle or late middle) age, not even at younger 30-somethings or 20-somethings; it is aimed at those who are so young that their undeveloped and relatively uncritical brains can be strongly influenced by such material. Children and young teens. The idea is to normalize the idea of mixed-race relationships, marriages, and offspring.
Many will recall the horrible Benetton posters of the 1980s and 1990s: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benetton_Group#Marketing. They were designed by an individual who later stood for election in
Italy on a supposedly radical platform: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliviero_Toscani; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_in_the_Fist.
Did the “controversial” advertising help Benetton itself? Not really. After initial publicity and (largely hostile) public reaction, Benetton faded: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benetton_Group#History.
The Body Shop [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Body_Shop] was another commercial enterprise that mixed selling things with a socio-political agenda. The joint founder, Anita Roddick, copied the Body Shop idea word for word from a shop of the same name in Berkeley, California, and she then made a huge success out of it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Roddick.
My problem with Roddick’s business (in the 1980s) was not its environmental campaigning as such, but the fact that its employees had to subject their own views to those of Roddick, as I understand. For me, in terms of the Threefold Social Order [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_threefolding] concept, that was an example of the economic sphere interfering, and so wrongfully, with the political sphere or “sphere of rights”.
In fact, much of the Anita Roddick Body Shop project was permeated by fakery, though I have no doubt that Roddick believed in much of what she said.
I was once slightly acquainted with the family of a girl from London who told me, when I last encountered her (on a train from Blackheath to London Bridge, sometime in the mid-1980s), that she was going to work in the (then just going to open) Body Shop in Moscow.
The girl’s father was a senior official of the Foreign Office Research Department, who owned a tremendous library of Russian art books, as well as some high-quality Scotch whisky.
The girl had originally wanted to join the same part of the Foreign Office as her father, but the familial connection had apparently made that impossible. I wonder whether she ever did get to Moscow to work, and whether it worked out.
I have in fact just now discovered that Body Shop either did not open in Moscow in the 1980s, or perhaps did open but later closed, perhaps re-opening in 2006: see https://citywire.co.uk/funds-insider/news/russia-ready-for-body-shop-experience/a269320. At any rate, it is there now: https://www.thebodyshop.ru/. Anita Roddick herself died in 2007, at the age of 64, and the Body Shop, less “activist”, is now owned by other interests.
Reverting to the main point, we see a campaign now, on a wide front, to use (misuse) the vast resources of international business for socio-political propaganda in support of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan and, therefore, some of the aims of “Zionist Occupation Government” [ZOG] and the “New World Order” [NWO].
Late morning music
…so that said migrant-invaders can be ferried to the UK…
The migration invasion is being excused and indeed facilitated by “refugees welcome” dimwits, and/or politically-tendentious “activists”, and that applies particularly to those in the political and mass media milieux.
That (see above) tweeter, Julia Rampen, is or has been a freelance msm scribbler and talking head, who works now for IMIX, a public relations/pressure group with pro-migration invasion aims.
IMIX has co-signed open letters with other organizations, including one connected with a Clare Moseley. See details about Clare Moseley: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3924505/married-calais-jungle-charity-boss-who-romped-with-toyboy-migrant-fears-for-her-life-after-refugee-lover-tried-to-burn-down-her-hq/; and https://www.civilsociety.co.uk/news/charity-commission-opens-statutory-inquiry-into-refugee-charity.html.
Seems that the often-lax Charity Commission has had to step in.
More about the head of that charity: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/claremoseley
The IMIX organization has this website: https://imix.org.uk/our-funders/. Pretty well-funded…Even “Comic Relief” is funding it.
The “big battalions” are on the side of the invasion and the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. Only we, “we happy few“, stand ready to defend Western civilization.
Interesting in part, despite the tendentious commentary.
Almost all msm scribblers and talking heads are enemies.
Trouble is… Migration Watch, though very measured, very accurate, very respectful of law and established order etc, basically fails to see that this is a transnational conspiracy, and that the “British” Government (the Cabinet of which is now mainly Jewish and/or non-white, non-British) is part of that conspiracy (the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan).
Merely presenting statistics and then expecting a pack of corrupt sinister clowns like the present government to “do the decent thing”, or even the obvious thing, is a complete waste of time.
Video from 1939