Tag Archives: repression

Diary Blog, 29 July 2025, including a look at Peter Kyle, the rather “dodgy” MP for Hove and Portslade

Afternoon music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enigma_Variations]
[river Severn]

Tweets seen

If so, though, surely it would be better not to mention it, and let the Israelis continue to hit decoys…

Peter Kyle. Member, Labour Friends of Israel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Kyle

See hereinbelow for a more detailed look at that one.

Translates, approx., to: Reform 347 MPs (majority of 21), Labour 139, LibDems 67, Cons 35, SNP 28, Greens 6 (etc).

Monkeyworld.

I hold out little hope for Corbyn’s “real Labour” party. I should place its appeal somewhere in the 5%-10% area, and I doubt that it will be able to contest more than a hundred seats. However, in a few of those seats, it might have enough of a concentration of votes to win; in some others, it will split the vote to enough of an extent to topple existing Labour MPs, mostly to the benefit of Reform UK.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/29/famine-gaza-israel-war-starvation-hunger

[“Within 48 hours, Jerusalem is expected to make a critical decision: if Hamxs refuses to release the hostages, Israel may move to formally annex parts of Gaza. Unlike military withdrawals, which can be executed at any time, annexation is a near-permanent step. Under Israeli law, reversing annexation isn’t simple, it requires either a supermajority of 80 Knesset members or a national referendum. In other words, once annexed, the land doesn’t come back without a political war.”]

So Lebensraum for American and Israeli Jew settlers, basically, and the Palestinian Arab population “deported to the East” (somewhere), into Israeli Jew-constructed and Israeli Jew-guarded concentration camps which, given that the Israelis are starving the Arab population, refusing to supply medical attention to them, and just killing them outright by shooting them, would amount to “killing camps” or —would the appropriate term be?— “extermination camps”…

I wonder whether the Israeli population as a whole, or the Israeli political milieu and military/security apparat have thought much about what might happen down the line if/when Israel eventually gets defeated on the battlefield? Something akin to what happened in southern Israel in late 2023 but on a vastly bigger scale. When people are treated the way the (Israeli) Jews have treated those, the Arabs, who, pre-1948, owned most of Palestine, their revenge will be bloody indeed.

Talking point

More about Peter Kyle MP, Starmer-stein Labour, the Jews Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein etc, and corruption at the heart of government

“After university, Kyle worked as an aid worker and as a project director for the charity Children on the Edge in Eastern Europe and the Balkans helping young people whose lives had been affected by the political instability created by the Bosnian War and Kosovan War, helping to establish an orphanage in Romania.[3][4][5]

In 2006, Kyle became a Cabinet Office special adviser focusing on social exclusion policy.[4]

From 2007 to 2013, he was deputy chief executive of the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO). In 2013, he became chief executive of Working for Youth, a newly formed charity focusing on helping unemployed youth.[6]

[Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Kyle]

Kyle is MP for Hove and Portslade, by Brighton. The associations are obvious. Heavy Jewish and also heavy gay influences.

Wasn’t Peter Mandelson also involved in organizing youth clubs etc before he became a political figure?

More tweets seen

[“One year on from Southport, our country & children are even less safe and more at risk Our borders? Completely and utterly out of control Our communities? Being used to host thousands of other young men from war-torn nations who are breaking our laws Our state? Now so absurd it is literally importing members of the Taliban while gagging the press Our government? More interested in controlling our speech than our borders and security All this is the very opposite of how a responsible government would have responded to Southport“]

The Southport atrocity, terrible as it was, was merely a tiny fraction of what has happened in this country by reason of the importation of millions of inferior people.

As for Starmer-stein, well…it surely is obvious now (as I blogged well over a year ago, around the time of GE 2024) that he is, to put it politely, in the wrong job.

[Zelensky’s version of Fiddler on the Roof...]

Talking point

From my one-time Twitter account (which was closed down at the instigation of a pack of Zionist Jews in 2018).

Late tweets seen

(((Patron Law)))…

Mark Lewis is both negligent and dishonest. He was “puffed” by the msm to a ridiculous extent during and after the phonehacking scandal about 13-15 years ago.

See also:

Pseudo-conservative globalist greaseball Fraser Nelson once again admitting, in effect, that he is a traitor to the British people, their society, way of life, and their future.

Ha ha! Trump really is becoming a little bit silly now…

…let alone in the 1960s… but that was before the UK became the dustbin of the world.

Late thought

On “British” TV news today, impossible to escape the ridiculous “lionesses” nonsense. Pretty obvious why it is being pushed so hard; a distraction from the real UK and real world news. Several different agendas being pushed at the same time.

Late talking point

I think that a lot of people in England are exactly of the same mind, mutatis mutandis.

Late music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C4%81nis_Ivanovs]

Diary Blog, 24 July 2024

Morning music

[The bridge over the Thames at Sonning, Berkshire. I was at school, in the early 1970s, only a half-mile away, and the grounds of the school went down to the Thames (on which I rowed when aged 13/14) only a short distance from that bridge]

Talking point

Tweets seen

How long before Starmer-Labour introduces similar measures in the UK? The justification will be something similar to that in the cartoon below.

The two aspects mentioned are a convenient “go-to”.

Those who question the System narrative, or suggest an alternative and/or better way forward for society, are often already “criminalized”, usually at the behest of the “usual suspects” (((“them”))).

“Labour” is now just a label, as is “Conservative”, “Liberal Democrat”, and “Green”.

Echoes of Weimar?

Late music

[painting by Leonid Afremov]

One Man’s “Extremism” is Another Man’s Struggle for Liberty and Justice

I had occasion to visit a small NHS facility recently. It was a lovely, quiet unit, with only about a dozen or so patients, those patients living, prior to discharge, in several large “bays” and a few individual rooms. The unit was surrounded by flower gardens with small flowering trees and a few classical statues. Beyond that (out of sight) was a very small town (little more than a village) and the countryside of Southern England. If you have to go to a hospital, you could do worse. So why am I blogging about this?

While waiting to go in to see the patient in question, I perused the literature rack by the nursing station. One leaflet caught my eye. I have it before me as I write. Under the NHS logo and the name of the NHS foundation trust running the unit at the strategic level, the title:

PREVENT

[the words contained within a shield device; with two hands –dark blue and light blue (the old KGB colour..ironic) and perhaps (?) representing white and non-white– clasped]. The leaflet was then sub-headed:

Preventing vulnerable people from being drawn into terrorism

Inside the leaflet:

What is Prevent? Prevent is part of the government’s counter terrorism strategy; aiming to prevent people of all ages from being radicalised and drawn into terrorism.

The leaflet continues:

What kind of extremism does Prevent aim to deal with? It aims to deal with all forms of extremism; for example far right extremism, animal rights extremism and religious extremism.

So we see that “terrorism” has already been conflated with or replaced by “extremism”, an even less easily-defined idea. Moreover, we see that Islamist terrorism, the only kind actually posing even a slight threat to public order in the UK, is not mentioned by name (no doubt that would be called “Islamophobic”…) and only coyly implied, sub nom “religious extremism”. No doubt the Jewish Zionist fanatics, who go in their hundreds to be trained by the Israelis in Israel, are not considered “extremists”, “terrorists” etc. No, they just go to an alien society to be trained in the use of weapons and in the techniques of killing with bare hands (oh, and of course, how to “bring down” British MPs thought not to be pro-Israel or pro-Jew…).

Who are these “extremists” in pole position in the Prevent leaflet? Ah, yes, the “far right” (also left undefined, presumably social nationalists, those who hate mass immigration and the trashing of the UK by certain groups and types) as well as those who hate the cruelties inflicted on the animal kingdom by some humans and by human society; but let us now return to the leaflet:

What are some of the possible signs of radicalisation?

  • you may notice changes in the person’s behaviour or mood;
  • the person’s appearance may change and they may spend excess [sic] time on the internet;
  • the person may start to express extreme political or radical views;
  • the person may become withdrawn or have a change in their circle of friends.

So now we have travelled from “terrorism” and even “extremism” to people who have or may have merely “radical” points of view about, say, the disastrous effect that mass immigration has had on the UK, or about the exploitation and cultural contamination carried out by Jew-Zionists, or even about animal welfare.

The leaflet then asks what the reader might do should he or she actually suspect that another person has changed lifestyle or perhaps have acquired “radical” views:

  • NOTICE: Be aware of an individual’s vulnerability to radicalisation, any change in behaviour or ideology. An ideology is a set of beliefs an individual may have. [this section of the leaflet also contains the iconic alien-looking “all-seeing eye” motif…]
  • CHECK: If possible and appropriate check out any concerns with the individual…your line manager and the [NHS] safeguarding team. [this section of the leaflet contains a motif of a magnifying glass with a little humanoid figure inside the lens…]
  • SHARE: You need to share your concerns with the [NHS] safeguarding team. They can advise you on any relevant partner agencies who will need to be contacted. [note “will need to be contacted” not “may need”…presumably police, MI5 etc].

The leaflet then goes on to list telephone numbers and internet contact details, before ending with these dystopian remarks, which would not have been out of place in an early 1970s BBC Play For Today, or perhaps George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four:

What happens to my referral? [“my referral”, note, not “my denunciation”, “my informing”, my accusation” etc…]. Prevent referrals are shared with the MASH (multi-agency safeguarding hub) or [name of city] SPA (single point of access) depending on where the individual lives. Referrals are then screened for acceptance in to the channel process.

What is channel?

Channel is a multi-agency process whereby professionals and partner agencies can share resources and expertise. The aim of channel is to work with the individual to reduce risk. If your referral is accepted into the channel process you may also be asked to attend the channel meetings to share relevant information as part of effective multi-agency working.

I have sometimes been accused of being, inter alia, a “grammar Nazi”, and am, of course, (also) appalled by the poor English displayed in the leaflet. I have no idea by whom the leaflet was written. Perhaps the Home Office and MI5 are now less likely to recruit graduates from Oxford or Cambridge, or perhaps the near-illiteracy shown is just a function of the UK’s sliding educational standards. The main impression given, though, is that of a police state operation which would be recognizable to an official of Stalin’s Russia or any similar society. The saving grace is probably that it is not (though I am guessing) very efficient.

Indeed, shorn of the millennial “nudge”-government, fake “sharing caring” and armchair psychology nonsense, the leaflet could be seen simply as a method of recruiting agents…

Finally, think about where this leaflet was found– not in a prison, a government office, nor even in a university library, but in a normal NHS clinical environment in the heart of the South of England…

Notes:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four

Addendum, 25 January 2019

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/humberside-police-transgender-twitter-thinking-2466084

Addendum, 4 February 2019

http://www.salisburyreview.com/articles/going-to-prison-for-having-the-wrong-thoughts/

scan25

Update, 2 September 2019

So there we are: once the chistka starts, it takes on a life of its own…