Tag Archives: Twitter

Diary Blog, 4 March 2021

Late-morning music

I have been watching, recently, a TV mini-series (three episodes) called Zen, which though a British production and using some British actors and actressses, is filmed entirely in and around Rome. It is a about a detective called, oddly, Zen, who works in the Questura (the Italian police detective branch).

As with many other well-known fictional detectives (Inspector Morse, Inspector Alleyn, Wallander, Sherlock Holmes), Zen himself is rather an outsider, in his case because he is both incorrupt and from Venice.

Zen is a quality production in every respect, and maintains the seriousness while not omitting a small amount of passing humour here and there.

Having never been to Rome, I cannot say how well the series captures the grandeur-meets-squalor of that great and ancient city, but it seems a plausible representation, to me at least.

Until last week, I had never heard of Zen, which is from 2011. Apparently, the then controller of BBC1, a Jew called Cohen (why? Always…every single time…) decided to cancel the series because “there were too many male crimefighters on TV“…Why do “they” always ruin everything decent that they touch? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_(TV_series).

Strange Twitter

I had a Twitter “account” from 2010, and started to tweet regularly and quite prolifically from 2011. I used my own name (“@ianrmillard“). The loud Jew-Zionist cabal on Twitter (really just a small number of unpleasant individuals) had me expelled from Twitter in 2018.

Since then, I have not posted on Twitter; I have no other, and never have had other, Twitter accounts. Recently, I have noticed that, if I look on Twitter, I sometimes notice accounts of people and organizations which carry the notice “Follows you“.

How and why, when I have no Twitter account? I am not very technical, so it is a complete mystery to me.

Tweets seen

Part of the Big Brother “weekly clap”, I mean the reason why many did clap, was that there was and is a feeling that Britain was ceasing to be a community. People therefore, many people anyway, bought into the fake communitarianism of the “weekly clap” etc.

I wonder, though, how many, overall, did stand outside their houses clapping. Where I live, a tiny minority.

Jonathan Sumption was once the epitome of the Establishment — a brilliant barrister who represented the Government in the Hutton enquiry, Supreme Court Justice, supporter of the Remain campaign and esteemed historian of the Hundred Years’ War. But then Covid happened.

Over the past year, his unabashed criticism of lockdown policies has turned him into something of a renegade. It is a development that mystifies him; as he sees it, his views have always been mainstream liberal, and it is the world around that has changed.

In the course of our conversation, the retired judge doesn’t hold back. He asserts that it is becoming morally acceptable to ignore Covid regulations, and even warns that a campaign of “civil disobedience” has already begun.” [UnHerd magazine].

Very interesting. Unfortunate that the video subtitles (actually unnecessary anyway) are only semi-literate: e.g. “wreath” for “Reith” (Lord Reith https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Reith,_1st_Baron_Reith).

Lord Sumption, a former Lord of Appeal and Justice of the Supreme Court, who has been treated recently as a crank and half-mad dissident by the msm. The problem that Lord Sumption faces is that he is talking on the ground of reason, whereas the “lockdown” fanatics, facemask zealots and others of that type (who, with a mob of scared rabbits, may well even be a majority of the population) are dealing in fear and unreason, which is inherently more powerful as a tool of persuasion.

John Stuart Mill regarded public sentiment and public fear as the principal threat to a liberal democracy. The tendency would be for it to influence policies in a way that whittles away the island within which we are entitled to control our lives to next to nothing. That’s what he regarded as the big danger. It didn’t happen in his own lifetime; it has happened in many countries in the 20th century, and it’s happening in Britain now.” [Lord Sumption, on UnHerd/Lockdown TV]

That “Lockdown TV” interview is the sort of intelligent, reasoned, quite lengthy interview that is now never seen on any msm television station in the UK; reminiscent of the interviews done by the late and great Brian Walden on Weekend World about 40 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weekend_World; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Walden.

Interesting to see and hear Lord Sumption has come to the same conclusion that I came to nearly a year ago about the various tyrannical “laws”, “rules”, “guidance” around “Coronavirus”. That is, that there will be little mass public anger, but more of a hidden or half-hidden defiance. In other words, “Yes, repeat No“…

As I have written often before, I never use the terms “Right”/”Left”, but the self-describing “left” now has nothing to offer people, no vision of a better society etc. It concentrates on “deplatforming” anyone described as “Right”, which apparently covers anywhere from Brexit Party, UKIP and the “alt-Right” wastes of space right through to National Socialists and those who, like me, postulate ideas and concepts which might form the basis for a society far in advance of where we are.

You can see it on Twitter, that element which is mostly pro-Corbyn-Labour, anti-Israel (mostly) while at the same time (mostly) supporting the Jewish Zionists! Also, connectedly, paying lip-service to the “holocaust” narrative etc.

Basically, the post-1989, post death-of-socialism self-describing “Left”, or pseudo-socialist position, has nothing at all to offer the people. It is an ideological and political dead end.

Hitchens writing of Olivia Manning’s Balkan Trilogy put me in mind of another literary work, in fact a “dilogy”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaka_(fiction) (extended and adapted for British TV about 30 years ago).

It occurs to me that Scotland might become a kind of “Slaka” if (when) it achieves faux-“Independence” under faux-“nationalist” political party, the SNP.

The present kefuffle around Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon etc is a straw in the wind. Salmond (obviously guilty of sexual shenanigans despite his plainly politically-motivated acquittal a while ago) and Sturgeon (a petty tyrant) are the Romulus and Remus of Scottish (fake) Independence.

I have no objection, as such, to Scotland breaking away from the UK. I wonder, though, how many in Scotland understand in what sort of country, poor and politically-repressed, they may end up living?

As a matter of fact, I can see upheaval coming to Scotland, in that only about 50% (it may be 55% or even soon 60%) of the Scottish voters support the SNP and/or Independence (as presented). If, then, the anti-SNP or anti-“Independence” 40%-50% are forced to live under a corrupt and incompetent SNP regime (even now putting forward extreme anti-free-speech laws), expect fireworks.

More tweets seen

Actually, that condensation and adaptation of part of the New Testament is rather kinder on the Jews than the original:

When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death: And when they had bound him, they led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate the governor.” [Matthew 27, King James Version]

And straightway in the morning the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council, and bound Jesus, and carried him away, and delivered him to Pilate. And Pilate asked him, Art thou the King of the Jews? And he answering said unto him, Thou sayest it. And the chief priests accused him of many things: but he answered nothing. And Pilate asked him again, saying, Answerest thou nothing? behold how many things they witness against thee. But Jesus yet answered nothing; so that Pilate marvelled.” [Mark 15, King James Version]

Now at that feast the governor was wont to release unto the people a prisoner, whom they would. And they had then a notable prisoner, called Barabbas. Therefore when they were gathered together, Pilate said unto them, Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus which is called Christ? For he knew that for envy they had delivered him.

When he was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him. But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus. The governor answered and said unto them, Whether of the twain will ye that I release unto you? They said, Barabbas. Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified. And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified.” [Matthew 27, King James Version]

When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it. Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children. Then released he Barabbas unto them: and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered him to be crucified.” [Matthew 27, King James Version]

Other tweets seen

Re. the Royal Mulatta, it is so funny watching the self-describing “Left” defend “Meghan”, simply because she is “black” (actually, of course, a half-caste, like Obama). No matter that she has, apparently, bullied her staff etc, she’s “black”. That’s her anytime Get Out Of Jail Free card.

As for the Royal Cuck, what can one say? Why are the “socialists” of Twitter not asking the question “why should we respect the Royal Cuck anyway?

Were Prince Harry mere Harry Who?, he would be, at best, a junior Army officer or something like a car salesman.

The concept of royalty, in the real world, is mainly dependent on blood descent. Even leaving aside the Royal Cuck, the Royal Mulatta has no right, really, yet she is given the title of “duchess”. They have both forfeited any right to position and respect, and they have done what they have done for money and to be “celebrities” on American TV.

Actually, these contaminated British titles (duke, duchess, earl, baroness etc) are now so devalued that they really should be done away with.

I suppose that the ludicrous “Royal Married with Children” soap will continue. It’s a good alternative, for American TV, to other wealthy “celebrity” riff-raff such as the Kardashians.

A good “conspiracy theory” might be that the Royal Cuck and the Royal Mulatta are being built up as a way of engaging the interest of Britain’s new raceless, cultureless masses, who have little time for the traditional royals. I don’t suppose that such is the case (it’s too subtle for the royals, I expect) but an interesting idea an sich…

Musing….it seems to me that the Harry and Meghan marriage might be described as “White royal privilege meets black affirmative action privilege”. Just an idle thought…

The best way of describing Meghan Markle would be as in the old German saying, “Put a beggar on a horse and (s)he rides it to death“…

Late afternoon music

Interesting film

New York in the 1930s…

Amazing how different many of the places shown are today (and were even when I was last in New York, 28 years ago).


Late tweets

If the Gulf Stream really were to falter, and to fail to reach the UK, Britain might be plunged into something akin to an ice age, albeit (?) limited.

Late music

Diary Blog, 23 January 2021

System censorship

Ask not for whom the bell tolls…

Well, well…after years of begging or demanding that social-national people and others be “deplatformed”, the self-describing “Left” is now itself starting to be hit. Seems that they forgot that “the Revolution devours its own children” [Jacques Mallet du Pan; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Mallet_du_Pan].

It is hilarious to read today on Twitter the convoluted logic of the “antifascist” self-describing “Left” types, as they attempt to prove that “two legs bad, four legs good“, and that “deplatforming”, among others, social-nationalists, National Socialists (of the contemporary sort), conservative nationalists, general dissidents and/or “conspiracy theorists” (eg David Icke) is or was “good”, while of course the removal of the Facebook account of the ludicrous “Socialist Workers Party” [SWP] is evil and tyrannical.

What goes around comes around. If you campaign for years to have people expelled from Facebook, Twitter, whatever, don’t be so shocked when the same happens to you.

I suppose that many will say that I must be glad when the SWP, or “antifa” idiots, or Jew-Zionists etc are expelled from Twitter or wherever. Not so, apart from being amused at the long-anticipated inevitability.

Firstly, as a believer in freedom of expression on social, political, religious and historical topics

Secondly, because Twitter, especially, is a good open-source intelligence resource. Enemies expose themselves that way.

This is so funny! “Dr” Louise Raw (prolific tweeter and “antifascist”) lashes out at someone who makes the obvious point about free speech:

For people of her type, “free speech” really does mean “free speech only for me and those with whom I agree”; to demand free speech in general is “a lazy cliche“, she says…

“Dr” Raw and her co-ideologists fail to see that she and they are themselves living political cliches, as outdated as the picture of the cruiser Aurora that was on the masthead of Izvestia.

Izvestia at 100: A Russian Century Through the Lens of the Top Soviet  Newspaper

The picture of Aurora was in fact a representation of the Order of the October Revolution

Yes, the self-describing “Left” is a unwitting political cliche: “No Pasaran!” (the slogan of the Madrilenos during the Spanish Civil War); “socialism” (old-style socialism in fact died in 1989); which they now combine with being facemask and lockdown zealots, “refugees welcome” dimwits, as well as keen supporters of police and other repression (of their ideological opponents) and —risibly— supporters of the supposed property rights of the like of Facebook and Twitter (when “deplatforming” supposed “Nazis” etc..). Until now.

As I have blogged previously, the self-describing “Left” has nothing to offer at all, which was one reason why Corbyn-Labour crashed and burned in 2019.

True, the Jew element that pervades the mainstream media did trash Corbyn and Labour for 4 years, but Corbyn was a bit of a joke anyway, a Lenin-cap-wearing, “no Pasaran!”, “refugees welcome”, “Cable Street!” nitwit.

I concede that the Conservative Party did not win the 2019 election except by default…

…but that is precisely the point. We now have a basically Jewish-Zionist (-ruled) government of clowns because, in 2019, people abstained rather than go out to vote Labour. Twice as many 2017 Labour voters abstained in 2019 than voted Conservative.

The British people have aversion to mass immigration, fake “refugees” etc, and have no interest in the rights and wrongs of the Spanish Civil War, 1930s East London, Fidel Castro, or Venezuelan politics.

Even if the present “Conservative” regime were twice as unpleasant and incompetent as it is, Labour of the Corbyn kind would still have no appeal (and I doubt that Jewish lobby puppet Starmer will do much better).

The self-described “Left” is irrelevant, politically, and its main redoubt now is Twitter (and what is left of the trade unions and the Church of England), where it talks to itself in the echo-chamber. There is actually no point in arguing with “antifascist” and old-style pseudo-“socialist” poseurs, because they have no chance of political success.

Only social nationalism has even a chance of overturning the System.

Tweets seen

…a few of many similar tweeted comments…

Exactly. The self-describing “Left”, as I wrote earlier in today’s blog, has no integrity or purpose left. Its only interest, apart from tweeting suitable tweets (attacks on “Tories”, “fascists”, “Nazis” and “gammons”, i.e. white British people; eulogies about selected blacks, or officially-approved Jew “comedians”), is that of having “deplatformed” people of social-national or conservative-national views. In other words, making malicious complaints to Twitter, Facebook, employers, msm, police etc.

A kind of humanoid “rats on a treadmill” scenario…with the self-describing “Left” as the rats, and Twitter as their perpetual treadmill.

Meanwhile, real opposition to the existing System, and ideas for a better society, will come from others.

Can you imagine, say, Lenin…a Lenin whose main interest is running to the police, or local authorities, or the Okhrana, or employers of opponents, and bleating “Excuse me, excuse me! Are you aware that XYZ has very bad ideas and opinions? Should you be allowing that?” (etc)?

I think not!

That is essentially where the “Hope Not Hate” and “UAF” crowds are; the “antifa” idiots generally; the Mike Stuchbery, “Dr.” Louise Raw and similar types, as well as (of course…) the Jewish lobby cabals, such as the infiltrative “Campaign Against Antisemitism” fake charity, with its contrived complaints to police, its suborning of MPs, ministers and police and crime commissioners, and its private —and politically-motivated— prosecutions of artists and singers (such as Alison Chabloz) and thinkers.

[Alison Chabloz; https://alisonchabloz.com/]

More tweets

Quite. We now live in such an age of socio-political fantasy that many think that (as the Government and its idiotic “experts” believe), the reason for “virus transmission” is that “people are not compliant” when in reality there are scared rabbits everywhere, wearing facemasks even when walking down streets alone. There is little evidence of rebellion, though (as I predicted months ago) there is probably a certain amount of “yes repeat no” superficial compliance (with some bending of the dictatorial “rules” on the quiet).

Likewise, we have the unthinking worship of the NHS, even when it is clear that (despite excellence here and there, and great dedication on the part of many doctors, nurses and others), it is largely maladministered.

The unreality that pervades the UK now became hilariously apparent when Gavin Williamson was still Defence Secretary [https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/05/02/deadhead-mps-an-occasional-series-the-gavin-williamson-story/] and, inter alia, wanted to send a warship to the South China Sea as a warning to the Chinese government! That would really frighten a state that can deploy about 600 warships and submarines, with a similar number of naval aircraft! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_Navy.

The System has in fact promoted the pervasive unreality, as with the “TV ads with black man and white woman and coffee-coloured children”, now ubiquitous.

Late music

Diary Blog, 11 November 2020

Mark Collett

As noted yesterday, Mark Collett of Patriotic Alternative was expelled by Twitter. Here is his commentary on that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lAUVrCNxsM&feature=youtu.be

Collett is echoing my blog posts about the phenomenon. As he says, others preceded him, including me. Also including, inter alia, David Icke, Katie Hopkins, many many others. I myself was expelled in 2018, at the instigation of the usual coalition of Jew-Zionists and “antifa” dupes.

Collett also echoes in his video what I have been saying —at least since my talk at the London Forum in early 2017— about “the privatization of public space“.

Tweets seen

Alarming, but the ageing European population should not be an excuse for the importation of blacks, browns and others who are racially non-European. White Northern Europeans should be having children.

…and the man who also had an affair with Tony Crosland, who, like Jenkins, was also a Cabinet minister under Harold Wilson! I had no idea until recently, when I was researching something completely different: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Crosland#Personal_life; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Jenkins#Marriage_and_personal_life; https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/may/16/double-lives-a-history-of-sex-and-secrecy-at-westminster.

The State schools (especially) are basically brainwashing factories now, and fee-paying schools are little better.

“The virus”

Had news from someone in the USA about a university student related to the news-giver: the student went to a party, and later tested positive for “Coronavirus”. Result? A cold and some congestion. The “panicdemic” in operation…

Tweets seen

Yes. Toby Young has said not a sausage in defence of the free speech of Alison Chabloz, who is still undergoing fresh persecution by the Jew-Zionist lobby, led by the fake charity called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA” (in fact, she is supposedly going to be on trial yet again at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London soon, if the trial actually proceeds). Neither did Young (or the Spectator fake “free speech” mag) say anything in support of Jez Turner, quite wrongly sentenced to 12 months in prison two years ago.

For that matter, Young and that whole “libertarian” cabal failed to say anything supportive of me over the years (eg when the Jew lobby had me disbarred in 2016).

Toby Young is just a controlled opposition 20-carat fake.

“African Aviation Technology” video

Full marks for both optimism and courage, though!

More tweets

Well, if for once Toby Young is not full of scheiss, I expect that he, Laurence Fox, Claire Fox (no relation to LF, I think) and the others around them will be at Westminster Magistrates’ Court to support the free speech of Alison Chabloz.

Here is the address and transport detail: https://courttribunalfinder.service.gov.uk/courts/westminster-magistrates-court

[Alison Chabloz]

Fee Fy Fo Fum, I smell the blood of an…” Oh, no…(((wait)))…

Trump

I still think that one way Trump could really mess with the heads of his opponents and the “antifa” swine would be to grant Presidential pardon to hundreds of broadly social-national people who are presently serving time in Federal prison. There’s nothing to stop Trump doing that.

My Friend the Waffen SS Soldier

Interesting remembrance: https://natureandrace.blogspot.com/2018/04/my-friend-waffen-ss-soldier.html; and https://natureandrace.blogspot.com/2018/04/my-friend-waffen-ss-soldier_10.html

Barnardos goes full SWP…

I cannot prove it statistically, but non-whites usually give little to charity. Look at India and other parts of the world. White, mostly British people, helping the poor and suffering, while Indians usually do little. That applies especially to the wealthy Indians. Egypt is even worse.

Ah…just seen it: Barnardos is now headed by one Javed Khan…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javed_Khan_(executive), who is paid just under £200,000 per year.

Late music

Diary Blog, 4 November 2020

US Election

As I blogged previously, even some months ago, this will be close. What a farce, though! Two absurd candidates.

It is a commonplace to read that the Electoral College system is undemocratic, in that it allows a candidate with fewer votes than the other main candidate to win, and so become President.

On the other hand, were total numbers alone to be determinative, and as things are now, that would mean a permanent Democrat and non-white majority (and President).

Many will say “why not?”, but even if one leaves aside my view that white people must rule, it can be seen that such a permanent non-white/Democrat majority would lead to civil war and the break-up of the Union.

The mainly white “flyover” states would eventually secede.

The present system at least allows states far from Washington D.C., and from the larger population areas, to have some kind of say.

Enrichment? Something to “celebrate”?

London Zoo? No. London as a zoo.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/london-camden-police-appeal-burned-bus-passenger-hair-b39563.html

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/mitcham-name-man-wanted-after-alleged-rape-teenager-kadian-nelson-b44322.html

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/girl-14-murder-crawley-b30312.html

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/tottenham-stabbing-man-20s-b30247.html

London started to be a zoo a long time ago. I can recall incidents even in the early 1980s. I fully expect London to be more or less uninhabitable by 2050, at latest.

Law Commission paves the way for a real police state in the UK

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8911037/Could-heated-talk-dinner-table-HATE-CRIME.html

I wonder how many of those behind this report are Jews or Muslims?

Harry Miller, a businessman, former policeman and founder of Fair Cop, which opposes hate crime rules, said: ‘If the private home law is adopted by Government, a comment over the dinner table about a huge range of people could lead to a prison sentence.

‘Human rights laws protecting privacy and family life would be in the bin. This is a neo-Marxist idea.

Sarah Phillimore, a barrister and…Fair Cop member…said: ‘I cannot believe the Government is being asked to consider surveillance of citizens in their own home. How will the evidence of such hate crimes be collected?

Will we have an East German-style secret police like the Stasi?’” [Daily Mail]

In the sick and nasty little society developing, under SNP auspices, north of Hadrian’s Wall, Muslim “Scottish” “justice minister” Humza Yusuf (yes, that really is a minister of the “Scottish” “nationalist” devolved government…) is already proposing a similar law for Scotland. Where are the “Bravehearts” of today??

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8911037/Could-heated-talk-dinner-table-HATE-CRIME.html

Stalinist, almost literally. Stalinism without Stalin.

(ironically, the Angela Merkel police state is really just a less neurotic but equally controlling version of the East German police state, the DDR, which most people think disappeared after 1989…). Is the UK going the same way? Looks like it (during the period 2010-2020, the Security Service, MI5, doubled its staff numbers…).

Also, see below for the latest informal police state action by a social media quasi-monopoly…

David Icke

The tweeter above, a non-European (Iranian, but working for the ZOG/NWO BBC), thinks, clearly, that (assuming that that is the case) David Icke making “false” claims and speaking against government “restrictions” is more than sufficient reason to have his Twitter account removed.

You can take the Persian out of the Iran police state, but you cannot, it seems, take the police state out of the Persian…

Tweets seen

The Jews (meaning the Jew-Zionist lobby) and the whole ZOG/NWO matrix has been pushing to muzzle Icke for years. Now they have found a superficially plausible excuse, “fake news” re. “the virus” (and at a time when ludicrous SAGE has been showing the public false information, statistics and graphs on TV…). See below; the extreme Jew-Zionists admit that they were at least partly behind the killing of Icke’s freedom to communicate:

Professor Ferguson of “SAGE” and Imperial College, in between screwing his married “ho”, in cotravention of his own “lockdown” rules, managed to scare the pants off (also) the British public, by forecasting 800,000 deaths in the UK “within months” (this was 7-8 months ago…). Why does the egregious professor still have a Twitter account, then?

We ae in the ludicrous situation where the supposed most powerful person in the world, he US President, Donald Trump, can have a tweet removed by Twitter! Probably removed by some faceless executive. This is just mad.

The notion that David Icke has been “suspended” (expelled) from Twitter (as I was, at the instigation of a pack of Jews, in 2018) because of any fault of his, is rubbish.

There is a push now to institute a transnational NWO/ZOG police state by or around 2022. The “British” police just took part (a day or two ago) in a 7-state operation to arrest social media and other writers, co-ordinated by the Angela Merkel ZOG/NWO “German” police state. Also, the Bitchute platform has just been “taken down” at the same time.

President Kennedy said that those who make peaceful reform and protest impossible make violent revolution inevitable…

David Icke used to follow my Twitter account (when we both had one). My account was one of only a couple of hundred, if I recall aright, that he followed. He obviously valued it.

Take a look at Twitter. All the prominent System and Jew “journalists” (scribblers) etc are celebrating. They love to see the free speech of free people trashed. Enemies of the people…

There is no legal, peaceful, way to retaliate against Twitter and the emergent police state. Remember V for Vendetta? A flawed film, but compelling all the same…

Forget Parliament, the supposed “free” Press, the legal establishment, the fake political parties propped up by (((You Know Who))) corporate money etc, the politicized police. All empty vessels.

Typical academic drone. “False”? What about people who claim that millions of Jews were killed in WW2 “gas chambers” (a claim for which there is no credible evidence whatever)? Are they allowed on South African TV? Oh, yes!

Other tweets seen

Look at the one below:

Observe the smugness. No doubt someone who thinks that he is against “hate”, yet he disparages elderly people (which he probably defines as anyone over 50), “tinfoil hat enthusiasts” (anyone who thinks outside the box?) and the “generally uneducated” (undefined). He would probably find me a puzzle…and many others too, I imagine. I daresay that my IQ, education, experience and qualifications would stack up pretty well against his…

As for him, he seems to be some kind of self-regarding nobody who says that he is a director of a small, possibly inactive, business in provincial South Wales. His tweets are pretty silly. Yet he judges others whom he does not even know. So very typical of many of the “Twitterati”.

Oh, since that tweeter loves “lockdowns” so much and is, no doubt, getting money from the State to make up for loss of business revenues (if any), he will not complain down the line when he has no business, no customers, no money, and no future for himself or his child. Oh, no, wait…

Yes. Exactly. The Maoris migrated to New Zealand about 400 years before the Europeans did (Captain Cook set foot there in 1769), but the Maori = “indigenous”, and Europeans = “settlers”, apparently…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_New_Zealand

In Britain, white Europeans arrived many tens of thousands of years ago (one footprint from 800,000 years ago exists!). Until the 20thC, few non-Europeans (blacks etc) lived in Britain. A few servants were imported in the 17th and 18th centuries as status symbols or novelties. Until the 1970s, the UK was essentially a white country, about 99%. Yet the non-Europeans in the UK now are supposedly “British” and with as many rights in all respects as us! It’s mad. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Britain#History

That New Zealand authoress, Olivia Pierson, is quite right about the tattoo etc.

So there we have it. More private/State censorship…

Setting up new sites etc just kicks the can down the road. Those instituting a public-private censorship state fear no consequences…

False claims aout the “pandemic” (panicdemic). Will Whitty and Vallance (and Ferguson) now be removed from Twitter etc? Of course not…

Labour now has nothing to offer the British people. Neither does the Conservative Party.

I have no idea whether political chicanery is going on in the US Presidential election, but in fairly recent history it was almost ubiquitous in some states, including Illinois and Michigan. It is said that there was outright fraud in favour of John F. Kennedy in 1960, notably in Chicago, and that without it (done by the Mob) Kennedy would have lost Chicago, lost Illinois and lost the election.

Gove. Wall. Squad. End.

“Boris” Johnson. A man of straw.

Wall. Squad, End.

About 64, at least (an ex-barrister writes…)

A former State-paid barrister and a former part-Jew scribbler...Ecce! “Our” Prime Minister and the Leader of Her Majesty’s Totally Screwed Opposition…

Afternoon music

“Lockdown” madness

Well, the Westminster monkeyhouse (junior salon) passed the latest police state “lockdown” measure by 516 votes to 38. “Labour”, under Jewish lobby puppet Starmer, supported the Boris-idiot Government.

US election

At time of writing, the result is in the balance. Radio talking heads discuss the possibility of “unrest”, but all that really matters is who is “anointed” by the Deep State, if you will, as President. Whoever, whichever, candidate is so “anointed” will be able to call upon all the resources of the state: Army, National Guard etc. End of argument.

That may not always be so clearcut, but for now it is.

More tweets

Here is where the Hitchens type of politics falls flat. It is all very well to say “punish the so-called Conservatives at the next elections” or “punish so-called Labour at the next elections“, but how on Earth, in a basically binary political system, does that work?! Punish both “main parties”? How? by voting LibDem? Hardy ha ha. Or for Con-man Farage’s latest “party” of controlled opposition? Impossible. Not credible.

Late tweets seen

New Zealand has become a bad joke…

Late music

Diary Blog, 13 July 2020

I noticed some tweets by Twitterati using a test or quiz similar to the one below, which indicates (supposedly) one’s political orientation. I have tried such tests previously and obtained similar results, perhaps closer to dead centre.

personalised chart

I disparage the “left/right” usage, really.

If anyone wants to follow in my footsteps: [https://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2?ec=-5.75&soc=-0.31],try here: https://www.politicalcompass.org/test

This, below, is a similar test, incorporating “social conservatism” v. “wokeness”… http://www.thetakemachine.co.uk/quiz

My result: http://www.thetakemachine.co.uk/quiz/XFUNtk/results

[above: the copy function does not seem to work properly on this graphic; at the top should be written “—social— conservative”, on the bottom “woke”; “left” and “right” on the lateral axis]

So it seems that I am not very “woke”. Quelle surprise…

Tweets seen

Jesus H. Christ!

200 migrant-invaders “caught” in just one day and brought to Dover! The untermenschen, having been “caught” in the Channel ( meaning “rescued”, or in reality “escorted”), will now be registered, given accomodation, money etc, and will batten off the British people forever. Whoever supports this is a traitor and should be treated as such.

People still tend to think that the “Conservative” Government and its ministers somehow want to stop the migration-invasion. No they don’t. They are slaves of the Zionist money-power, of ZOG and the New World Order (NWO). They want to import blacks, browns, and others in huge numbers. Wake up, people, for God’s sake! Look at the way Boris-idiot has just now invited as many as four million Hong Kong Chinese to settle on our overcrowded islands…

See: https://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-the-genocide-of-the-peoples-of-europe/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi

This has been carefully planned.

Amazing war story

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/repelled-30-taliban-400-rounds.html

A Gurkha like that has earned the right to live here, but I should have thought that he could live better by far on the same money (military pension etc) back in Nepal.

Tweets seen

Well, the “government” of Boris-idiot is now actually reinforcing the misplaced fear in the population by mandating (not yet official, but almost certainly) the muzzling of shoppers as well as travellers. The ridiculous “lockdown” shutdown should have been for a few weeks only, to rub in the message of caution to the population.

This 4+ months of “lockdown”/shutdown is trashing the economy, and that will continue, despite the official lifting of the “lockdown”, because the Government insists on muzzling the population, which makes many people think that they are still in danger from “the virus” despite the fact that most people are in no danger anyway, and never were; the wave has passed now, and there is no compelling evidence that there will be any “second wave”. There may be, there may not be. Probably, there will not be. In any case, most of the most vulnerable in the UK have succumbed already.

The black man [above] is presumably a U.S. citizen. Even so, his belief in the U.S. Constitutional “free speech” rights (as amended by statute and case law) is frighteningly naive (or disingenuous) for someone who, according to his Twitter profile, is a columnist for the New York Times. Reading his tweet, maybe he is just rather stupid.

I am still, though purely nominally, an attorney of the Bar of the State of New York, and have lived and worked in the USA (New York, New Jersey, South Carolina), as well as visited the country for leisure and pleasure (Florida, mainly). The fact is that, yes, in principle and subject to exceptions, you have “free speech” in the USA to a greater degree than exists in the UK or EU. That “free speech”, however, only protects you (to some extent) from arrest and imprisonment; not from other, socio-economic, sanctions or penalties.

It is cold comfort that, in the USA, someone might be —relatively— immune from arrest for holding or expressing the “wrong” views on politics, society, religion, history, but yet might, because of the Jew-Zionist influence, lose his or her job, profession, and so (quite possibly) income, home etc.

As far as the UK and EU are concerned, you have no or very little free speech. My experiences include (but not exclusively) the following: https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/when-i-was-a-victim-of-a-malicious-zionist-complaint/ and https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/the-slide-of-the-english-bar-and-uk-society-continues-and-accelerates/

In most EU states, expressing the “wrong” view about the Jewish “holocaust” narrative is illegal, actually forbidden by law, just as, in the mediaeval period, expressing the “wrong” (even if accurate or “right”) view about religion, astronomy etc was illegal, and might be punished by death as a capital heresy.

In the EU today, to examine modern history, and to revise the popular or “brainwash” view even in a limited way, is illegal and termed “holocaust” “denial”. A modern heresy law.

The NWO/ZOG nexus has moved from trying to criminalize free speech (though that is still part of the plan, especially in the EU and UK) to making the big moves over the glasses of Champagne (or bowls of chicken soup?) with the aim of simply having huge capitalist enterprises remove “account-holders”, thus “deplatforming” them.

Those “alt-Right” accounts whose holders were making a living from being dissidents have mostly now been removed from most platforms of importance, meaning mainly YouTube, Twitter, Facebook. These platforms are not classical monopolies, but are effective monopolies; quasi-monopolistic enterprises, if you like.

An “account-holder” on Twitter and the rest has no real rights, certainly none qua citizen; only —almost non-existent— consumer or contractual rights.

The joke is that the bulk of the Twitterati, for all their supposed “socialism”, “human rights”, and —in some cases— quasi-revolutionism etc, end up bleating that Twitter, YouTube etc have every right to remove unwelcome dissidents, because those dissidents signed up to get a account in a private-enterprise company, and so signed up to (no doubt Jew-Zionist-drafted) “Terms and Conditions of Service”.

In fact, the pitiful weakness of the “woke”, of the supposed “socialists” etc is made manifest very plainly in respect of this question. Very instructive. It is why the pseudo-socialists have no traction politically, as seen in the 2019 UK General Election. Ideological weakness. You could even call it an ideological vacuum.

The “alt-Right” wastes of space thought that they could both put forward views and make a living online, relying on “free speech rights” and on being doormats for the Jew-Zionist lobby. I suppose that the Breitbart crowd led the way. Paul Joseph Watson etc. “Prison Planet” Watson. He perennially kow-tows to the Jews and Israel, even though many and perhaps most despise him and laugh at him. He still had his YouTube channel removed, and there is nothing he can do about it but beg and plead and stamp the foot.

Katie Hopkins. Similar. Very similar. “Alt-Right” “conservatism”. Pro-Israel. Pro-Jewish lobby. Despised by the Jews, most of them. What happened? Removed from Twitter and, I believe, YouTube.

The lesser “alt-Right” wastes of space went the same way, or are going there. “Sargon of Akkad” etc. Without their “mainstream” online platforms, they are unpersons. The Jews and their “antifa” puppets are laughing. Why? Because they know that “Prison Planet” Watson, Katie Hopkins, “Sargon of Akkad” etc are not going to raise an army to annihilate them. In fact, they are not going to do anything except bleat and stamp feet on the small and uninfluential platforms to which they still have access: GAB, Parler, Telegram, Minds etc.

The reader will get my point readily enough: these “alt-Right” people are men of straw and indeed (in the case of Katie Hopkins and lesser-known ladies) women of straw. Their online “armies” of “followers” will not gather together offline, but will just surf other online accounts. It is hard to escape the conclusion that, in one respect, the Jewish and “antifa” cabal(s) are correct: without those online platforms, these fake “conservative”-“nationalist” people have nothing, and are nothing.

What of “Tommy Robinson”? He, to some extent, has bridged the gap between the online world and the offline “real” world. Yet without his online presence, all that he can command is a loose army (a small one, at that) of drunks and bottle-throwers.

In fact, for what do the “alt-Right” wastes of space stand? Nothing really. Certainly nothing tangible. They are against a few things, such the migration-invasion, the Islamist element, the “Black Lives Matter” nonsense. On all these matters, I stand on their side. The problem resides in the fact that they have no positive ideology.

Not having an ideology is a characteristic of the contemporary political scene in the UK. The “Conservative” Party government of Boris-idiot, Cummings etc has no real ideology, not even the pro-private enterprise quasi-“libertarianism” of Mrs Thatcher and her like.

As for the “Labour” Party, equally misnamed now, can it be said to “have an ideology”? No, unless bleatingly pathetic “wokeness” can be said to constitute one.

Other tweets seen today

A tweet below re. the recently-trending #JewishPrivilege Twitter hashtag from the malicious “CAA” [“Campaign Against Antisemitism”] Jewish pressure group (heavily involved in ZOG activities and especially the devising of false complaints to police and social media organizations):

Condemned out of (((their))) own mouths. “They” want to “regulate” social media, meaning control and censor accounts and content.

The reply tweet below caught my attention

How accurate that is, I mean the assertion that Jews controlled, eventually, much of the transatlantic slave trade, I cannot say, though I have seen (purported) evidence before. It seems plausible. After all, there was big money to be made out of slavery before the British banned it.

Musical interlude

Tweets seen

[click to read whole thread]

I had to correct Julia Hartley-Brewer once on Twitter, some years ago, after the radio loudmouth tried to correct me (a former practising barrister) on a matter of law or legal procedure. I was right; she was wrong. After she realized that she was making herself look stupid, she just gave up and blocked me. So much for her listening to other views (and in that case, my “view” was not an opinion but verifiable and —for anyone knowledgeable— indisputable fact).

Having said the above, she is right on the issue here in question, i.e. the echo-chamber of the “woke” types, something about which I have been writing for years. Julia Hartley-Brewer only just realized? Well, after all, she is a great deal less intelligent, educated and aware than she imagines…Still, at least she agrees with me on something.

More music (and a few interesting designs)

Midnight music

Diary Blog, 28 June 2020

The censorship darkens again

The prolific tweeter and one-time TV scriptwriter, Graham Linehan, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Linehan, has been “permanently suspended” (the weasel equivalent of “expelled”) from Twitter, as I was in 2018.

I had brief interaction on Twitter with Linehan a couple of years ago. He was unpleasant, rude, and rather stupid. He also failed to say a word in support of me, both when I was disbarred —at the instigation of a pack of Jews— in 2016, and later, when I was expelled from Twitter (2018). Indeed, I think that he laughed at my being chucked off Twitter, in fact. Well, hardy ha ha…

Do not ask for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee“, Linehan!

Alternatively, “First they came for the [people they called] ‘Nazis’, and I laughed; then they came for the ‘Alt-Right’, and I laughed; then they came for mainstream Twitter drones unwilling to accept untruth as truth, and I was one of those, and I got chucked off Twitter, because no-one then supported my freedom to express my views”…

I have never seen Linehan support the free speech rights of such as Alison Chabloz or Jez Turner, either. Maybe he wants to keep onside with the Jews, in the hope of getting his work back on television, which, in broad-brush terms, the Jews control.

Despite my not having a good opinion of this Linehan person, I support his free speech rights. I take the moral high ground.

This is all part of a campaign to remove “unwanted” opinion from all areas: newspapers, book publishing, academia, education generally, online publishing, including social media. I have blogged before about this. Some examples:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/tommy-robinson-banned-on-facebook-the-repression-of-free-speech-online/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/01/06/free-speech-individuality-v-collectivity/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/09/11/to-what-extent-can-the-uk-still-be-called-a-free-country/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/05/03/the-knives-are-out-for-freedom-of-expression-and-more/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/11/18/the-war-on-freedom-of-expression-in-the-uk-usa-and-eu-states/

A huge number of people have been expelled from Twitter, including Tommy Robinson, Katie Hopkins, Ian Millard (me), Alison Chabloz. A few dissenters hang on (so far): David Icke, Nick Griffin.

Twitter becomes ever-more an echo-chamber consisting of (leaving aside the near-brain-dead, such as One Direction fans, football fans etc) two main groups: the Jewish cabal and its dupes, and/or the “antifa” idiots, faux-“socialists” etc, as well as System drones (msm, Westminster and so on).

Thus twitter becomes every day less and less representative of UK opinion as a whole, which is why its socio-political judgments go so awry: its predictions of elections, referenda etc are always wrong.

As to Linehan’s fight with the increasingly aggressive “trans” lobby, I blogged about the overall matter some time ago:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/11/15/when-reality-becomes-subjective/

[incidentally, if you read my blog post above, you will see that some Twitter users’ tweets quoted in the article are in faint script. That is because they have now all been expelled from Twitter for posting truth about the “trans” issue. Linehan is far from being the only one. The photos they tweeted to support their case have all just gone. “Long live freedom!” Oh, no, wait…]

Here is an example of the anti-free speech mob, tweeting:

We see, constantly, on Twitter, that “XYZ is not free speech but hate speech”. That simple (simpleminded) formula can be used against pretty much any viewpoint: “racism” is not free speech but “hate speech“, “opposition to Black Lives Matter is hate speech, not free speech“, “White Lives Matter is hate speech, not free speech“, “holocaust” “denial” is not free speech but hate speech“, and so on.

At root, this anti-free-speech tendency was initiated by the Jewish-Zionist element, though in a few cases it is turned against its originators.

You only have to read tweets from various “antifa” and similar idiots on Twitter to note the glee exhibited that “another enemy/reactionary/fascist/Nazi” (etc) has been removed.

What the idiots fail to see is that, firstly, Twitter, in itself, is really not very important, and that, secondly, they are just the unwitting dupes of the System, which is playing them like a balalaika. Thirdly, that it might happen to them, and since many of the “anti-fascist” idiots seem to have no life outside Twitter, that may hit them hard…(rubs hands).

They also neglect the fact that, if peaceful means of socio-political expression are removed from the British people, the British people, or some of them, may turn to less peaceful means of expression. If that happens, all bets are off as to what might transpire.

Priti Patel and Robert Jenrick

Priti Patel, the terminally thick East African Asian presently posing as Home Secretary, was on the Andrew Marr Show earlier. For me, life is too short to waste much time on the lying words of a stupid but cunning woman who, had it not been for Idi Amin, would have been fronting a Kampala grocery store rather than UK government policy. Still, here is what she said:

I have blogged already about Jewish lobby tool and corrupt little pissant, Robert Jenrick. Priti Patel is another Conservative Friends of Israel member, who was, notoriously, sacked by Theresa May for, in effect, playing the traitor in Israel.

Priti Patel is not a very good advertisement for the University of Essex. Actually, thinking about it, I have never met a University of Essex graduate who is a good advertisement for it…(I believe that her main degree was from Keele, of which I know little).

Another thing Jenrick and Patel have in common:

Well, it took a while, but now you’re getting it, Vance, old boy!

The problem with a government like this, meaning hopeless, incompetent, nasty, traitorous, an elected dictatorship, but “voted into office” via a completely fixed political and electoral system, is that, until the next general election, there is simply no “peaceful” way to remove it or its Cabinet ministers; and even if the fake “Conservatives” (ZOG facade) were to be removed from office in an election, all that would happen is that a very similar ZOG-“Labour” government would replace them.

Simulacrum of a Scot

Pakistani “Scotsman by invasion” denigrates the very Scots (white Scots…there are no others!) who gave him, those like him, and their families, refuge. He calls for White Genocide, in effect.

I am unsure as to which particular Pakistani “Scot” this is. There are so many now in Scottish political life, both in (misnamed) SNP and (misnamed) Labour.

Actually, what the hell is wrong with the Scottish people these days? They accept fake “nationalism” led by a fake “nationalist” party, they allow Pakistanis like the one in the clip to get away, as it might be put, scot-free with calling for the elimination or subordination of the (real) Scottish people; they often seem to contain the most deluded or brainwashed of the UK’s people in terms of race, culture, the EU etc, and they mostly voted Remain. Why do any of the Scots vote for non-whites to be MSPs? National madness (not that England is very much better right now).

Well, there it is…

a close up of a toy car: The attacker has been named as Badreddin Abadlla Adam

Well, there it is, the Sudanese who stabbed six people in Glasgow. Another fake “refugee”. What have “refugees welcome” dimwits Yvette Cooper and “@ZoeJardiniere” said about this? Anything? Nothing?

My view? He should have been shot before he stabbed six people in the street. Oh, but of course, I am an “extremist”…My view? The “extremists” are the political criminals who import trash like this into the UK.

Midnight music

Update, 30 June 2020

The censorship on YouTube (some people call it “JewTube”), intensifies:

Update, 29 January 2021

Well, as predicted in the main blog post, David Icke has now been removed from all major online platforms: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/04/twitter-permanently-bans-conspiracy-theorist-david-ickes-account; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52517797; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52501453

The former footballer, 68, has made controversial unproven claims about the virus on several internet platforms, including a discredited theory that it is linked to the rollout of the 5G mobile network.

Famous medics including Dr Christian Jessen and former junior doctor Adam Kay have called on social networks to remove Icke from their platforms.” [The Guardian].

Incidentally, the “famous medics” mentioned above (of whom I had never heard) are both gay doctors who are better known as TV personages. One, Adam Kay, is a Jew who left medical practice after an incident described in Wikipedia thus: “Kay worked as a doctor between 2004 to 2010, leaving the profession after a patient suffered an undiagnosed placental abruption; the expectant mother was subsequently taken to the intensive care unit, while the foetus was delivered stillborn.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Kay_(writer)#Medicine.

The other “famous medic”, Jessen, while having called for the removal of David Icke for having expressed an opinion on “Coronavirus”, has been criticized for his own views: “During the COVID-19 pandemic, Jessen sparked criticism for comments, saying that Italian COVID-19 countermeasures were an “excuse for a long siesta”. He also commented on the severity of the pandemic, regarding it only as a case of bad cold and scaremongering by the media.[22]” {Wikipedia].

Jessen has also been involved in other controversy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Jessen#Controversies.

The controversial Jew-Zionist activist and TV face, Rachel Riley, also commented.

The Countdown presenter Rachel Riley celebrated Icke’s departure from the the popular website, tweeting: “The UK’s foremost hate peddler/conspiracy grifter has finally been chucked off Twitter.” [The Guardian].

Diary Blog, 20 June 2020, including thoughts about Twitter and Katie Hopkins

[above: a sentence which the censors of free speech, and the enemies of Europe’s future, should consider]

Katie Hopkins

It had to happen. The censorship and hypocrisy pervasive in the whole society is magnified on Twitter.

On Twitter, white (i.e. European, or Aryan, or post-Aryan if you like) people are always in the wrong, unless they “bend the knee” (literally or metaphorically) in sign of fealty to those of inferior race and culture.

There is, of course, a double standard on Twitter. The blacks and browns and— a fortiori— Jews are allowed pretty much free rein. White (i.e. European or European-origin) people can be “suspended” and/or “permanently suspended” (they mean “removed”) quite easily, especially when packs of Jews (or those effectively controlled by Jews) gang up against them.

That is what happened to me in 2018. I joined Twitter in 2010 but tweeted almost nothing until 2011. The Jew-Zionist pack on (UK) Twitter targeted me after I tweeted something about a BBC Radio 4 Today Programme piece about the “restitution” scam, whereby Jews whose ancestors owned property (buildings, houses, gold bars, Old Master paintings) in Central or Eastern Europe in 1930s (sometimes procured by the Jews via fraud and outright theft) have such property (or money in lieu) “restored” to them.

Basically, the governments of various European states end up paying money to the Jews in “compensation” for what was expropriated from the Jews’ grandparents or great-grandparents. All claimed to be an outcome of the “holocaust” farrago (in fact most of the property was abandoned when Jews left Germany, Poland etc for the UK, USA, France etc).

The relentless Jew-Zionist attack on me, from about 2011 onwards resulted in my being disbarred, albeit only in 2016, 8 years after I had left Bar practice.

The now-disgraced and infirm Jew-Zionist solicitor, Mark Lewis, was trying to “get” me for years, and the two Jew-Zionist packs with which he was most associated, the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” and “UK Lawyers for Israel” both tried to have me disbarred, arrested and charged (with various faked-up offences), and expelled from Twitter.

Well, I was never arrested, let alone charged, tried or convicted of anything, but I was disbarred, after a nearly two-and a-half-year struggle. I have blogged about all this:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/when-i-was-a-victim-of-a-malicious-zionist-complaint/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/the-slide-of-the-english-bar-and-uk-society-continues-and-accelerates/

I have also blogged fairly extensively about self-publicizing Jew solicitor, Mark Lewis, now a resident of Eilat, Israel:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/01/11/update-re-mark-lewis-lawyer-questions-are-raised/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/12/22/mark-lewis-lawyer-latest-update/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/12/20/self-publicizing-supposed-top-lawyer-mark-lewis-full-transcript-of-disciplinary-hearing-judgment-now-released-by-tribunal/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/12/19/the-latest-revelations-about-zionist-supposed-top-lawyer-mark-lewis/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/12/13/more-details-about-mark-lewis-lawyer-and-his-abusive-social-media-presence/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/12/11/mark-lewis-lawyer-disciplinary-case-now-updated-to-11-december-2018/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/11/23/mark-lewis-lawyer-tries-to-have-part-of-the-case-against-him-thrown-out/

[above: the Jew solicitor, Mark Lewis, tweeting to people…]

Incidentally, Mark Lewis is still on Twitter and even has a “blue tick”, meaning that he is considered favoured; that despite the fact that Lewis actually bought about 70,000 non-existent “followers” (his wife at the time, Caroline Feraday, did similar; the marriage itself was brief, and lasted months not years). Lewis has kept at least 15,000 of his bought “followers” (he originally, when briefly “famous”, around 2012, had about 8,000, I thought, though Legal Cheek magazine said only 3,000, the same as me, ironically). That magazine pretended, for the sake of convenience, or for purposes of satire, to accept Lewis’s ludicrous “I wuz hacked” plea:

https://www.legalcheek.com/2014/06/phone-hacking-lawyers-twitter-gets-hacked-and-he-becomes-most-followed-member-of-uk-legal-profession/

When I was expelled from Twitter, I had only 3,000 followers, but at least they were all real (I also followed only about 50 accounts, mostly organizations; Lewis follows, even now, 660 at time of writing).

Thousands of other tweeters have blue ticks, but I can think of only one social-national tweeter, Nick Griffin, and I doubt whether he will be on Twitter for much longer now.

The only consolation is that Twitter is largely a waste of time anyway. Twitter thought that the Brexit Referendum would be easily won by Remain, and that Trump had no chance of election in 2016 (etc).

I have blogged about freedom of expression. I have also blogged and (before I was expelled) tweeted about a connected topic, what I call “the privatization of public space“, meaning how a few huge quasi-monopolies (particularly Twitter, Facebook, ebay, Amazon, YouTube) have arrogated to themselves and their employees the right to deny a platform to those with the “wrong” views, i.e. anything that stands against a Zionist-controlled or influenced globalized dystopia:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/tommy-robinson-banned-on-facebook-the-repression-of-free-speech-online/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/01/06/free-speech-individuality-v-collectivity/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/05/03/the-knives-are-out-for-freedom-of-expression-and-more/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/05/03/the-knives-are-out-for-freedom-of-expression-and-more/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/09/11/to-what-extent-can-the-uk-still-be-called-a-free-country/

A few cartoons that make the point(s):

A few tweets seen supporting freedom of expression online

https://twitter.com/notasheepyet/status/1274198445134278658?s=20

More tweets, this time “celebrating” the removal of Katie Hopkins from Twitter. It is noticeable how many of those tweets are from those who make money out of the msm and who (unlike brave Laurence Fox) are desperate not to be blacklisted.

Look at the sneering, sadistic little bastard below, one Jamie East (note his proud “blue tick”, btw). Is, or was, an msm presenter (though I myself had never heard the name until today). The sheer nastiness comes out strongly. Also, like many others attacking Katie Hopkins, he seems to relish kicking someone who is down.

Here below is the contribution of Mehdi Hasan, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehdi_Hasan, who “bravely” puts the boot into Katie Hopkins now that she has been removed from Twitter.

Below, another nasty little man who probably thinks himself terribly clever laughing at serious and important concepts such as freedom of expression etc…

Above, the logical conclusion: a witch-hunt, as seen in, eg, the Stalinist purges. Guilt by association and assumption (though I see now that the above tweeter is just a dim troll of some kind, possibly hoping to add to his 25 followers on Twitter).

The mob of “useful idiots” crawls over the marble ruins of a civilization that it could never build…

More tweets seen

Take a look, below, at tweeter “@LdnPearl”/“coons be gone” (well, in the reported words of Jesus Christ, “you have said it“…):

[Update, 21 June 2020: the very next day, tweeter “@LdnPearl” changed her “coons be gone” name to “Pearl”. Why? I mean, after all, “tell the truth and shame the Devil”, in the old saying…]

Conclusion? Quite a few of the blacks, the younger ones mainly, just hate us. There can be no society with them. A tweeter like “coons be gone” is a useless millstone round the necks of the British people.

And here (below) is another seemingly dim person (why are so many dim people from Manchester? Still, that’s one for the psychologists or social historians, I suppose).

Below: another dim fellow?

Also, one of the huge number of tweeters for whom Twitter really matters. In fact, it matters scarcely at all. The reality is that Twitter is an adjunct to politics, not the main substance of it (as the obsessed believe).

My own view of the Katie Hopkins/Twitter matter

As said above and elsewhere by me, Twitter is largely a waste of time. It helps those who have external activity happening; it is not useful as a standalone. If you are, say, Donald Trump, and you are expelled from Twitter, well, in the end, you are still President of the United States.

To put it another way, and to deploy the “Ken Livingstone” argument, were Adolf Hitler around today and had the NSDAP, SA, SS etc, Twitter would certainly assist the dissemination of his views, but it would not, of itself, help him to attain power or to retain power.

Switching that around, if a person today has no real organization behind him (or her) but only a “social media” presence, that person, be he or she ever so “famous”, is a colossus on legs of straw. Take away the social media platform(s), and the online personality is left with nothing.

The above “de-platforming” has happened to quite a few already. At more or less random, one thinks of that ghastly American degenerate, “Milo”. Others hit by “de-platforming” from all or most large online fora (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube etc) have been such as “Prison Planet” (Paul Watson), “Sargon of Akkad” Benjamin, and of course Katie Hopkins.

The irony is, that several of those removed from various online platforms, though removed mostly because the Jew lobby wanted it so, have been almost desperately pro-Israel and pro-Jew. “Prison Planet” Watson and Katie Hopkins are two such supplicants. Another is Tommy Robinson.

Lesser known people (intellectual dissidents, dissenting artists etc) are also being removed from the major platforms. Alison Chabloz, Brother Nathanael, Ian Millard (me!) and many another. Some cling on here and there, but all are being purged now and will not be on those platforms for long.

For the “alt-Right” wastes of space, being “de-platformed” means that their income streams largely dry up. Take away their online stuff, and they have nothing left. Take away the online presence of a real social-national party (were one in existence) and it would be not fatal, but merely an inconvenience.

The “alt-Right” wastes of space (Watson, Hopkins, “Sargon of Akkad”, “Tommy Robinson” etc are indeed men (and women) of straw. The only one with any real troops is Tommy Robinson, but he is not social-national, more like a clan leader, and without real ideology.

I support the rights of free expression of those mentioned above mainly from general principle. I believe that people should be able to express, without let or hindrance, views on political, social, or historical topics. The enemies of our culture and civilization (the black mobs, the “antifa” idiots, the Jew-Zionists) believe in preventing free speech.

I might add that Katie Hopkins and the other “alt-Right” and associated types never said a word in support of me; few of them said anything in support of persecuted singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz; none said a word in support of Jez Turner, of the London Forum, who was actually imprisoned for a year at the behest of that same pack of Jew-Zionists, the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”.

My own views are not at one with those “alt-Right” and similar people, at least on most issues. For example, Katie Hopkins is, or says that she is, pro-Israel and pro-Jew. For me, that is the end, and “Ian Millard has left the building”. However, she has courage, that’s for sure, and I think that she is genuinely against the migration invasion of Europe by blacks and browns.

In the end, does online ranting, opining, analyzing (and yes that does include this blog) accomplish much? I say no. It may have some utility, and I blog out of a sense of duty, and because who knows what might not happen because I blog? I do not regard blogging as truly politically or socially significant. Neither is vlogging, or (still less) tweeting.

Katie Hopkins is not social-national in ideology, of course. She is also callous in her attitudes.

What is needed is a real social-national organization in the UK. The time will never be more auspicious than in the next 7 years.

Tweets seen on various topics

Coronavirus and the “lockdown”/shutdown madness:

Migration-invasion:

Birmingham has fallen…

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8441055/Birmingham-police-officers-knee-alongside-protesters-Matter-anti-racism-rally.html

In fact, all the police bending their knees in that report seem to be black. Scandal. Incidentally, the Daily Mail refers to the organizer of the protest as “Bishop” Desmond Jadoo (or should that be “Baboo”?). The church of which he is apparently a “bishop” is not the Church of England (God be praised for small mercies…) but the “Vision Temple of Praise Church”, whatever that may be.

Glasgow

I was unaware until today (looking at tweets) to what extent Glasgow has become non-European (I have never been to that city). Shocking infiltration into government, the legal system etc.

More tweets

That has been my assumption, that the “Black Lives Matter” semi-insurrection is centred on the kind of young blacks who have been born in the UK, and who hate everything about Britain and the British, largely because they have been filled with “anti-fascist” and anti-British propaganda at ghastly comprehensive schools, aka educational prisons (in some cases).

The tweet below must be a contender for “thick tweet of the day”!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Abbott#Political_controversies

More?

This (below) is the original interview:

Diane Abbott could have been Home Secretary…imagine that.

Diary Blog, 14 February 2020

First, music:

Bercow autobiography

The autobiography of former Speaker of the Commons, the half-Jew John Bercow, has been published, and is reviewed by Douglas Murray here: https://unherd.com/2020/02/the-strange-tragedy-of-john-bercow/

I did not much like what I saw (on TV) of Bercow: my primary criticism of his behaviour is that he was biased. He openly ranted against the BNP to the schoolchildren’s play “Parliament”, at a time when the BNP were within sight of winning a few seats, in 2009 or 2010. A silly and nasty little person, who seemed unable to control his drunken slut of a wife.

Historical note

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/01/26/the-tide-is-coming-in-reflections-on-the-possible-end-of-our-present-civilization-and-what-might-follow/

Freedom of expression

Harry Miller, the man whose freedom of expression was breached by Humberside Police, has spoken out for the first time after the High Court ruled in his favour.

Mr Miller, 54, was speaking on the steps of the High Court on Friday morning after partially winning his case against the force which descended on his workplace in response to a tweet they deemed to be “transphobic”.

The limerick, which was posted on social media, was recorded as a “hate incident”, despite the police admitting that no crime was committed.” [Hull Live]

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/harry-miller-humberside-police-court-3847539

He argued that Humberside Police, following the College of Policing’s guidance, had sought to “dissuade him (Mr Miller) from expressing himself on such issues in the future”, which he said was “contrary to his fundamental right to freedom of expression”.

The judge said Mr Miller strongly denies being prejudiced against transgender people, and regards himself as taking part in the “ongoing debate” about reform of the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which the Government consulted on in 2018.

Announcing the court’s decision, Mr Justice Julian Knowles said: “The claimant’s tweets were lawful and that there was not the slightest risk that he would commit a criminal offence by continuing to tweet.

“I find the combination of the police visiting the claimant’s place of work, and their subsequent statements in relation to the possibility of prosecution, were a disproportionate interference with the claimant’s right to freedom of expression because of their potential chilling effect.”

The judge added that the effect of the police turning up at Mr Miller’s place of work “because of his political opinions must not be underestimated”.

He continued: “To do so would be to undervalue a cardinal democratic freedom. In this country we have never had a Cheka, a Gestapo or a Stasi. We have never lived in an Orwellian society.” [Grimsby Live]

cc. Barnet Police, Essex Police etc!

It occurs to me that, just as Gandhi promoted the idea of “mass disobedience” in India, the users of social media might simply, en masse, refuse to go along with the nonsense that has been imposed for many years past, certainly since the Blair elected dictatorship passed the very bad law known as Communications Act 2003, s.127): http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/127

Twitter users and others should take their courage in their hands and surge through the trammels put in their way by bad law and manipulative special interest groups such as the Jewish lobby.

Dominic Cummings and the Boris-idiot reshuffle

This is the person now effectively in charge of what passes for a government of the UK, in a situation where the part-Jew sociopath posing as Prime Minister cannot do anything but come up with schoolboy plans to build bridges over oceans etc:

Below, my main blog articles about Cummings:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2020/01/03/dominic-cummings-a-government-of-dystopia-and-lunacy-posing-as-genius/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/08/10/les-eminences-grises-of-dystopia/

This is like some low-budget sci-fi/futuristic film, in which the government is run secretly from a rubbish-strewn inner London street and by someone whose only camouflage missing is a stack of copies of The Big Issue.

Meanwhile, as in the days of the more corrupt late-Roman emperors, or the mid-1970s’ Harold Wilson government of “Lady Forkbender” and her “Lavender List”, influence and indeed power is wielded not only by some eccentric posing as a dystopian “genius” but also by the “ho” of the idiot trying to pose as Prime Minister of this poor country.

Boris-idiot has a problem, because he himself is actually incapable of running the proverbial whelk stall. His metier is that of the part-Jew public entertainer.

View image on Twitter

What makes it worse is that Dominic Cummings is actually right on several issues, such as, inter alia, the need to deport black and other criminals— and the equally important need to stop the HS2 madness.

Suella Braverman

“Suella Braverman…is mesmerically dim, with the new attorney general’s latest Channel 4 News interview suggesting not only that she could be outperformed at the dispatch box but that she could be outperformed by the dispatch box. Or indeed any other item of furniture in the Palace of Westminster.” [Marina Hyde, in The Guardian]

Suella Braverman is yet another post-1997 political drone (elected 2015) who thinks that it is terribly clever to keep repeating the same phrases. I suppose that there are many average Joes who, reading the Daily Mail, Sun etc, think that a woman who is a barrister and has appeared in the High Court frequently must be highly intelligent, but those of us who have or have had similar status (and, as in my case, were also frequently in the High Court at one time) are harder to convince!

Lisa Nandy

Bin her. Bin her. Bin her. Das ist’s!

La vie litteraire francaise…

The Cabinet of idiots

Whitehall is now littered with…secretaries of state such as Gavin Williamson, while Liz Truss – who’d lose a battle of wits with an emoji – is the longest serving cabinet minister.

I’m afraid Johnson’s much-vaunted reshuffle this week merely served as a reminder that the only positive discrimination scheme in this country that has long functioned to the highest level is the one that puts idiots in the cabinet. By this metric, the loss of Andrea Leadsom is a blow, but one that’s more than made up for by the promotion of the likes of Oliver Dowden, Alok Sharma, Anne-Marie Trevelyan and Suella Braverman. Braverman in particular is mesmerically dim, with the new attorney general’s latest Channel 4 News interview suggesting not only that she could be outperformed at the dispatch box but that she could be outperformed by the dispatch box. Or indeed any other item of furniture in the Palace of Westminster.” [Marina Hyde, The Guardian]

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/14/dominic-cummings-cabinet-reshuffle

A reminder about Greta Thunberg

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/09/29/greta-thunberg-system-approved-wunderkind/

Africa

If only, after 1945, the European powers had agreed to co-operate in developing Africa as a continent, populating it with white people, taking care of the Africans, the wildlife, the environment, creating towns, cities, farms, with the environment, the animals, the birds being protected. No “African nationalists”, no corrupt and hopelessly incompetent African dictators or greedy African “democratic” politicians, no predation by marauders, whether African armed bands or greedy transnational companies.

It could have been so good.

CzLDvmnWEAArUFF

Midnight music:

images

Diary Blog, 31 January 2020

Brexit Day

I favoured Leave from the start (meaning from a while before the 2016 Referendum), but the process was royally mishandled by idiots such as Francis Maude (also a Common Purpose member, fyi), in fact so badly handled that I wonder(ed) whether that was not deliberate. Well, here we are, about to “leave”, though for now only on paper.

I wonder what kind of celebrations there will be. Not many and rather muted, I suspect. I am guessing that any “celebrations” will be rather squalid and sad, like New Year’s Eve used to be about 30 years ago in London, the Trafalgar Square fountains and statues boarded-up to protect them from drunken “revellers” (vandals and twerps, beer cans in hand, and with nowhere better to go).

The public mood is very downbeat, in my opinion: not sorry to be “leaving”, exactly; not scared either, but unenthusiastic, almost sullen.

As for Boris-idiot, looking at the first couple of months of his majority-government, my impression is that the man himself still looks like someone who, against the odds, has won the lottery, or inherited a great estate, and is not quite sure how to handle his unmerited good fortune.

Freedom of expression

Free speech (etc) continues to be attacked. Alastair Stewart of all people, who started political life as a “left-wing Communist” in the National Union of Students before getting into the absurdly well-paid newsreading line and becoming “mainstream”, has been sacked because a black “activist” and “lobbyist” from East London was too dim to understand a few lines of Shakespeare!

Katie Hopkins, meanwhile, has been “suspended” from Twitter (that’s what they called it when I was in reality expelled from Twitter in 2018…). She was the latest target of an unholy alliance of Jew-Zionists, Muslims and pseudo-socialist “anti-fascist” idiots, who all applaud the fact that a quasi-monopolistic finance-capitalist enterprise like Twitter can suddenly —and without being in any way accountable— “decide” to “de-platform” anyone it (i.e. its executives, or even minor office bods) consider to be “racist” etc.

Here below, NHS psychiatrist Tim G. Stevens, who tweets negatively about me from time to time, betrays a basically pedestrian mind. Twitter, says he, is a “private” company (let’s leave the exact terminology aside) and so can ban whomsoever it chooses.

In fact, it is wholly inadequate to say that huge transnational organizations such as Twitter, which hold such an overwhelmingly large market share that they are quasi-monopolies, are simply “private”, or non-State, actors and so beyond the reach of potential civil rights legislation (the type of legislation which does not as yet exist but should exist).

The actor Laurence Fox has been attacked recently for daring to question “woke” nonsense:

When Laurence Fox meets Bonnie Greer again, he should ask her why it is, in what many call “racist” Britain, that a black American woman with no educational background (she started to read Law in Chicago but dropped out), and who has mainly been engaged in writing the kind of subsidized theatrical works that have an audience of 2.5 people, was appointed to the Board of Trustees of the British Museum. She even became Deputy Chair for a while!

When I had a Twitter account, Bonnie Greer joined a host of System-approved msm drones, talking heads, journalists and other scribblers, MPs etc, in blocking my tweets (nb. not my tweets to them or even about them, but on general topics).

The madness continues and intensifies:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/01/31/man-convicted-race-hate-crime-wearing-make-america-great-hat/

Holo-what?

Ha ha! This made me laugh! Thank you!

For a more serious take on “holocaust” nonsense, see, below, the work of the late Professor Faurisson:

http://www.ihr.org/books/faurisson/faurissontoc.html

British politics, the home of mediocrity

I happened to see this person’s biog. on Wikipedia, having never previously heard of her:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joyce_Anelay,_Baroness_Anelay_of_St_Johns

So took some kind of degree and then taught in a secondary school for 5 years (1969-1974). Volunteered with Citizen’s Advice, sat as a lay magistrate in Surrey, sat on a tribunal for a while. Climbed up the Conservative Party organization in the 1980s/1990s and was elevated as a life peer in 1996. Apparently (looking at Wikipedia) not a mother, and married to a barrister who took silk and is, or was, a Deputy High Court judge; she herself appears to have worked full-time for 5 years only, on the face of it.

Now, this rather obscure lady remains a member of the Lords, has held ministerial positions, and has only to sign-in for 20 mins at the Lords to receive her £310 per day tax-free stipend, though I doubt that she is in need of the money.

I know almost nothing about this lady, so will not criticize her, but it seems to me that far too many MPs, as well as peers, have nothing very special to offer.

More about freedom of expression

The malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” “charity” has intimidated a music venue (again), the other victim this time (also not for the first time) being Gilad Atzmon, the Jewish but anti-Zionist jazz musician.

A little English music:

How Long Before UK Society Breaks Down?

I happened to see comments of General Sir Mark Carleton-Smith, the Chief of the General Staff [see Daily Telegraph link, below]:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/04/british-military-risks-irrelevance-doesnt-adapt-future-army/

The British military risks becoming irrelevant if it continues to focus on “missiles and tanks” as the main threats to the UK, the head of the Army has warned.

“The army must “update and change the rules of war” according to the Chief of the General Staff, to be able to tackle new threats like cyber attacks, whilst also deterring countries that rely on heavy firepower.”

General Sir Mark Carleton-Smith said a focus on high-tech weapons that are no use against low-level threats like fake news and subversion “leaves us close to a position of dominant irrelevance”.”

The main threat is not missiles and tanks, it is the weaponisation of globalisation, and those elements of globalization that have hitherto made us prosperous and secure: the mobility of goods, people, data and ideas.”

“Secure borders, or living on an island, are no guarantees against the corrosive and intrusive effect of disinformation, subversion and cyber.”

“The Army head suggested that traditional concepts of warfare were “increasingly redundant”.”

General Carleton-Smith fails to mention, at least specifically, mass immigration (and the subsequent and consequent births) as a factor impacting the very survival of the UK as a state, a country, a society.

Of course, if he did mention it in that context, he would be sacked.

At one time, the UK was a fairly cohesive society. Now it is not. It is a seething volcanic caldera, disguised only by a thin and disintegrating crust.

Look at what happened just today (4 June 2019):

A baying mob of anti-Trump “protesters” bait and then attack what seems to be a lone middleaged man. A porcine woman leads the abusive and violent multi-ethnic pack, shouting “nazi scum!” repeatedly into his face. I suppose that he was brought up not to punch a woman in the face, even one like her.

Look at the policewoman (or PCSO) who not only does not attempt to arrest the milkshake-thrower but looks terrified, before she is pushed aside by the crowd as an irrelevance. The police are just useless these days. That “officer” made no attempt to protect a citizen standing in the street outside Parliament itself. Well, in the end, she is just one woman in a clown outfit.

Incidentally, I am not exactly a Trump fan myself; that is another issue.

We often think that the UK is becoming a police state. How is that reconciled with the imminent social breakdown I am predicting? In fact, the two go together, and both are linked to the now-fragmented UK society.

As society becomes fragmented, the easy-going policing of the past has to change to try to contain the chaos just below the surface. In addition, anything which disturbs the surface calm, or relative calm, has to be criminalized. So we see that, as the foreign invading hordes and their offspring have multiplied in number, so have the penalties increased for anyone who suggests that they should not be in the UK, or should be removed one way or another.

This started in the 1960s with the first Race Relations Act (1965), and became increasingly more oppressive with subsequent Acts (1968, 1976, 1985, 2000, 2003). It is clear why: the threat of public order upheaval, as more and more “blacks and browns” (and others) arrived in the UK and started to breed.

Free speech, freedom of expression generally, freedom of choice (eg in offering employment, or housing or whatever) “had” to be curtailed for reasons of “preserving the Peace” and in order to keep up the pretence that the multi-ethnic/multicultural society can work, albeit at the expense of a certain loss of civic freedom.

There was also the realization that, as the non-British and indeed non-European populations expanded in size, they had to be pandered to, not “offended” etc, not because the reverse would be impolite or undiplomatic, but because those increasingly huge populations might rise up against the white British people who “allowed” them to come to the UK (though most of the British opposed mass immigration; it was always the System and its politicians etc that caused the influx and its problems).

It was and still is the Jewish Zionist element that was and still is behind much of the legal repression and the “ethnic” influx itself (“The Great Replacement”).

Over the years, the censorship of speech and restriction of actions has expanded from races and “ethnicities” to other parts of the general population: religions, sexual orientations etc.

You can now say, or post online, relatively innocuous views, only to find that you are not only faced with a virtual (online) mob baying for your blood, but also quite likely with a policeman at your door or on the telephone. My own experiences include this:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/when-i-was-a-victim-of-a-malicious-zionist-complaint/

If you say something that offends the general orthodoxy, you may lose your job, your professional status, your liberty.

The satirical singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz lost her job —singing for a cruise line— simply because her views supposedly offended some Jews, even though her views had nothing to do with that job. Later, she sang satirical songs about some of the hundreds (if not thousands) of “holocaust” fake stories. That resulted in a farcical cycle of police persecution, prosecutions, eventual trial, conviction, sentence, appeal and now (at time of writing) further appeal.

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/04/18/alison-chabloz-the-show-goes-on/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/alison-chabloz-the-fight-for-freedom-of-expression-goes-on/

Jez Turner set up the London Forum discussion group. He also made a speech in Whitehall in 2015, recalling how the Jews had been expelled from England more than once (and hoping that they might yet be removed again). Put on trial in 2018. Convicted. His punishment? A year in prison (he served 6 months).

I too was subject to action (by the same Jew-Zionist element): see above, and also

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/the-slide-of-the-english-bar-and-uk-society-continues-and-accelerates/

The Zionist campaign against free speech and free historical enquiry is being resisted, but the mere fact that such repression of free speech exists is very significant.

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/01/12/the-campaign-against-antisemitism-caa-takes-a-serious-hit/

In the last few years, the privatization of public space has led to the abuse of power by the main online platforms (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube etc), and even the organizations behind or around such platforms: paypal, patreon, and so on.

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/05/03/the-knives-are-out-for-freedom-of-expression-and-more/

When Twitter started to remove “unwanted” opinion from its pages, many turned to GAB, only to find that there was a strong and focussed attempt by the ZOG powers to destroy GAB. So far, it has survived. However, the campaign against free speech continues, and shows no sign of abating:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/tommy-robinson-banned-on-facebook-the-repression-of-free-speech-online/

Indeed, even a joke made (and posted online) about a Guy Fawkes event in a suburban garden can result in a police raid, evidence “bagged up” as for a murder case etc. Am I making this up to prove my point? No.

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/11/06/a-country-gone-mad/

Measures against free speech and freedom of expression are just, overall, a symptom of what is happening. By that I mean the fragility of civil society generally. We see that, as the police “crack down” on social media posts or stickers put up on university campuses (incredibly, some young people got 4 years in prison for the latter, quite recently), comments made in blogs etc, in the real world of the UK, crime and especially violent crime is getting out of control: London infested by mainly black and brown “moped raiders” and “scooter raiders” and muggers, “road rage” incidents, brawls etc. The courts are far more lenient, usually, on those real crimes than they are on the fake crimes or notional crimes of pretended offence.

I have seen over the years how thin the veneer of society is in the UK. As long ago as the petrol protests of 2000, I noticed that that veneer was already very very thin indeed. Fights breaking out over the fuel pumps etc.

The police cover has been reduced, and while the police seem to be enthusiastically noting and acting upon reports of anyone seriously (or even unseriously, thinking of the dog taught to do a “Hitler” salute! The owner got a heavy fine…) criticizing the failing multikulti society (or the Jews that are mainly behind it), they seem far less interested in the traditional role of the police, i.e. investigating real crime and keeping safe the citizenry.

As for the armed services, they seem to be going the same way. Reduced in numbers, and with their focus on the approved shibboleths of the “multi-everything” society: multi-ethnic, multicultural, LGBT-whatever friendly, with confused aims, ever-lowering standards and little ability to counter either conventional threats or new dangers.

There again, what are the armed forces actually defending? We are now at the 75th anniversary of the Normandy Landings. There may be disputes about whether the Second World War ever need have happened, about whether an honourable armistice between the British Empire and the German Reich might have been concluded in 1940, but leaving all that aside, the British servicemen and civilians of that era (albeit bamboozled by Churchill and his cabal, so be it…) knew, at least in their own minds, what their own society was! Something like the picture given in the popular song There’ll Always Be An England:

Is there a British society at all now? There are bits and pieces still operative, but the society as a whole is now a jigsaw. There are fissures and rifts and splits everywhere. Racial, ethnic, religious, ideological, sexual, economic etc. Some always existed, but not to this extent.

So we see a situation where, at the very time when the society itself is not a coherent whole, the forces which might compel civic obedience and discipline are not numerous or powerful enough to do so, despite theoretically strict laws relating to various areas.

What will happen in a situation (which might come sooner than many imagine) in which the population is without luxuries or even necessities? Who will control those seething and uncontrolled masses? Not the depleted Army. Not the very depleted police.

A social national movement does not exist in the UK. It may be that the only way for one to exist will be for its existence to become the only way for the whole society to exist.

Notes

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/may/06/strange-death-europe-immigration-xenophobia

https://gab.com/ianrmillard/posts/47468129

https://gab.com/LionoftheNorth/posts/47563842

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_Relations_Act

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9831912/I-feel-like-a-stranger-where-I-live.html