Note that the weapons shown are all equipped with the standard type of magazine, not the “iconic” drum magazines I loved as a child when watching the old 1950s/1960s black & white TV show, The Untouchables. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_submachine_gun.
So up to half a million lost in a year. Even if that figure includes those “merely” injured (many badly and even catastrophically), it is huge. Unsustainable. The Kiev regime cannot sustain such losses, especially combined with the very high rates of avoidance of military service, and desertion.
They accuse you of “misinformation” while always wanting to hide information from you https://t.co/enwfogg4qs
Israeli Jews (but backed by many, and perhaps most, Jews resident in other countries) are committing war crimes up to and including genocide, and have been for years, arguably since their Jewish state was founded in 1948.
— Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) May 18, 2025
Russian air defense forces shot down 75 UAVs and seven American-made JDAM smart bombs over the past day in the special military operation in Ukraine, Russia’s Defense Ministry reported on Sunday:https://t.co/j1nnx4cLCApic.twitter.com/5XQ7s3597C
This goes well beyond “a pound of flesh“, with or without blood.
It is certainly arguable (for a number of reasons) that Hamas should not have attacked areas of southern Israel in 2023. However, Israeli retaliation went from being somewhat proportionate, in the first few days after that incursion, to being both disproportionate and then utterly brutal after that.
Later, Israeli-Jewish brutality became really just a kind of State-organized sadism, which then morphed into, effectively, attempted genocide of the entire Palestinian Arab population in Gaza. Daily bombing and machinegunning (etc) of civilians, deliberate withholding of medical aid, destruction of hospitals, an embargo on food, the deliberate starvation of children and others, and the planned deportation or slaughter of the entire population.
Incredibly, the Israelis (and the Jews outside Israel that support Israel, and suborned puppets such as Starmer and other UK political and msm souls-for-hire) are still whining about what Germans and others are supposed to have done to some Jews in Europe and Russia, mainly in the early 1940s, 80-85 years ago.
The Israeli embassy was undoubtedly involved in lobbying for my prosecution for satirical songs.
Of the 3.6 million visas the UK issued in recent years, just 5% went to migrants on the high skilled worker route who are net contributors to the UK economy
£148k-a-year Deputy Mayor of Culture Justine Simons. All she does is go to pointless events and expense Londoners for taxis there and back (also a flight to Brazil). OH, and she's responsible for the Fourth Plinth.
Starmer is despised and hated. Not all political leaders, though, are afraid to meet and walk among the people…
More music
“Mark Lewis Lawyer”—latest news
Regular readers will be aware that James Wilson, a university lecturer, won a libel case against two Jews, Cantor and Mendelsohn. A third defendant, a vicious Jewish online troll called Pete Newbon, killed himself during the trial, having concealed his activities from his wife.
At conclusion of the trial, the judge criticized, and found not credible, the evidence of a number of Jewish “witnesses” called for the defendants. Among those witnesses, Adam Cailler (Daily Star scribbler), Joanne Bell (prolific on Twitter sub nom “@jobellerina”), one Nathan Comiskey, and Simon Myerson, a notorious and vituperative Jewish barrister and, at the time, Recorder (p/t judge) who since the trial (though not because of it), has been removed from the Bench by reason of his unpleasant social media arguments and remarks.
Mark Lewis, the egregious and now mainly Israel-based solicitor, acted for at least one, and I think at least two) of the defendants. The lost trial and the aftermath of that trial, brought out that Lewis had, not for the first time, misled the Court, and also had misled (whether deliberately or negligently) his own client(s), in telling them that, were he/they to lose at trial, his/their family home(s) would not be at risk in relation to the damages and costs of the proceedings (costs incurred by the victorious claimant, Wilson).
The Court, at and after conclusion of trial, made it clear that those homes were at risk, not protected. Lewis’s negligent or (arguende) deliberately dishonest behaviour and advice has thus put at risk the homes of the losing defendants.
I missed what has been happening in the past few days:
The Defendants in my case have to pay me £80k in costs tomorrow.
Their solicitors should pay, in particular Mark Lewis (@MLewisLawyer) of Patron Law (@LawPatron) because of the unbelievably appalling conduct.
Indeed. I hope that is about to change though. One might imagine that when the truth comes out about one of the UK’s leading media litigators, then it might be newsworthy?
Not sure whether Wilson is “tongue in cheek” there. Mark Lewis “one of the UK’s leading media litigators“? He must be joking. Lewis is just a self-promoting fraud, his dishonesty covered up (and his abilities hugely puffed) in past years by a Jewish-Zionist newspaper and TV cabal.
When Lewis was found guilty in the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal in 2018, his own Counsel asked the panel to limit any fine on the ground that Lewis was impecunious, his only assets being his own clothes, a private pension worth £70 a week, and a mobility scooter! Lewis was said not to own his own home, and even the car he drove was being paid for by the DWP scheme “Motability”.
The losing defendants, who were plainly misled by a cabal of their fellow-Jews, face losing their family homes. Wilson seems far more concerned about them than I would be in his place. Those Jews were after all (all of them, not just the hapless losing defendants) willing and eager to see Wilson and his family lose everything, including their home, so I say F*** them!
Wheels are in slow motion with the SRA. I suspect they’ll announce whether they are going to do anything, or give Lewis and Patron Law a clean bill of health, in the next few weeks.
Even if the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority does not, once again, put Lewis on professional “trial”, I imagine that his losing client or clients will very likely sue him in professional negligence to recover the monies (at least the costs monies) lost (apparently) by reason of Lewis’s poor advice. We shall see.
Those photos of Lewis must have been taken at least a decade ago. He is now scarcely able to get in and out of his wheelchair without assistance, as was seen recently after his latest scam (assisted by his now wife, Mandy Blumenthal) crashed and burned at the Edinburgh Fringe:
see
Video footage of ‘Israeli couple’ at the Reginal D Hunter gig in Edinburgh, who turned out to be professional UK Zionist victims Mark Lewis and Mandy Blumenthal, famous for Corbyn-bashing, representing Rachel Riley in legal actions and various publicity stunts.@reginalddhunterpic.twitter.com/XPpeZK7A9g
He’s superficially plausible though. And Patron Law’s website describes him as “The UK’s foremost media, libel and privacy lawyer Mark Lewis”. And he was willing to act on a no-win no-fee basis.
I think that I can claim to have been the first, or one of the first, to have seen through the Mark Lewis scam/hype/fraud. He was trying to have me disbarred and/or prosecuted since about 2012. Look at my blog posts about him (eg via the search box on the blog) for full details.
What’s strange is that Patron Law claim that Lewis is the “UK's foremost media, libel and privacy lawyer”.
I say Lewis’ advice and conduct in my case were terrible.
But neither Lewis nor Patron Law will defend what happened or threaten me with libel. Why? https://t.co/qDlGBKD0Jj
Lewis has never threatened me with a defamation suit either, though in my case my armour is, at least in part, my own impecuniosity.
No. I doubt the Defendants have the cash at bank or in hand to pay my costs.
They are also innocent parties in this disaster.
I do know that the firm of solicitors who provided the Defendants with terrible advice have the cash at bank and in hand to pay my costs though. pic.twitter.com/nzxN3M3JJE
Again, Wilson credits the losing defendants with far more than I would. They were guilty parties too, in my view. Surely Wilson does not also let the horrible Newbon (deceased) off the hook?
There must now be very serious concerns about the advice given by Mark Lewis to Pete Newbon before his tragic death.
My opinion is that Lewis’ conduct in my litigation was so poor, that Patron Law should suspend him pending an independent review of his files.@MLewisLawyer… https://t.co/qDlGBKD0Jj
I note that Lewis, once a prolific tweeter, and even quite recently a daily tweeter, and who famously was caught out having bought tens of thousands of fake Twitter “followers”— he still claims over 27,000 (at one time his fake “followers” numbered nearly 80,000), has not, as of today’s date, tweeted for a full three weeks. He must know that the game is up. I think that he will soon scuttle back to Eilat (Israel), if he has not done so already.
Talking point
"If you have a garden and a library, you have everything you need." Marcus Tullius Cicero pic.twitter.com/T0tXPB6SXQ
Nigel Farage: “I don’t give a damn who the next Conservative leader is. The truth is the brand is bust. They’ve let the country down too many times. People have had enough” #Reform
I agree with Farage on that point, but he too has not been steadfast.
Farage and Reform UK are pro-Israel, pro the Jewish lobby, not social-national, and so not “the answer” Britain needs.
Also, Farage has made it plain that he bases his hostility to mass immigration not on race and culture, but solely on general mass culture and on whether the immigrants “integrate”. I disagree.
Having said that, people cannot vote or flock to the banners of a party or movement that does not exist. At present, there is no credible social-national movement or party in the UK, a situation which has been the case since at least 2010 (when the BNP was destroyed), or maybe the 1970s or, arguably, since the start of the disastrous war against the German Reich in 1939.
What we have now is a situation in which the “Conservative” Party has been binned (though unfortunately not totally), and in which a fake “Labour” Party has, by reason of a ridiculously unfair and illogical electoral system, achieved a fake “landslide” by default, a “landslide” in which only 4 out of every 20 eligible voters (and 4 out of every 12 voting voters) voted Labour (and many even of those only because they wanted the “Con-men” and women binned.
Labour is already failing, and will achieve nothing in its projected 4-5 years up to 2029. However, the “Cons” are not a viable alternative, a fact underlined by the present uninspiring and mainly non-white leadership contest.
On that basis, Reform UK (which after all was voted for by over 4M voters, over 14% of the total) must be in with a good chance over the next 4-5 years.
Reform UK is not “the answer”, but it may be the start of an answer, or part of the answer, though the “Parliamentary road” is only one road.
Ian Robert Millard 