Diary Blog, 18 November 2024

Morning music

Historical note

EARLY JEWISH HOLDERS OF BANK OF ENGLAND
STOCK (1694-1725)

A very interesting list, sent to me by a reader of the blog.

What interests me especially is the fact that Jews were only allowed to re-enter England during the rulership of Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell invited them to come to this country only about 40 years prior to the Bank of England’s formation in 1694.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England#Founding

See also: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29777945.

Tweets seen

Keir Starmer appears totally incompetent, but that is at least partly a front to conceal the treachery of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan to import millions of non-white immigrants into Europe, and particularly the UK.

There is also the point that the “small boats” migration-invasion is only about 5% of the total invasion, the vast bulk of which is “legal”, superficially.

The mind of the public is of course focussed on the “small boats”, with 200-1,000 invaders per day coming in. Meanwhile, every single day, thousands enter “legally”, and largely unremarked in the msm. Overall, between 500,000 and 1,500,000 a year.

Within our lifetimes, this will collapse the whole society, if not stopped in its tracks.

Look at how the NWO/ZOG powers (using Biden, Macron, Starmer) are still trying to attack Russia. Supplying missiles (etc), supplying intelligence, supplying training for the Kiev-regime forces. Everything except actually pushing the launch buttons themselves.

What would be the American reaction if Russia gave the same help to Venezuela, Cuba etc?

Talking point

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roald_Dahl#Opposition_to_Israel_and_antisemitic_comments.

Wikipedia:

Dahl reviewed Australian author Tony Clifton’s God Cried, a picture book about the siege of West Beirut by the Israeli army during the 1982 Lebanon War.[200] The article appeared in the August 1983 issue of the Literary Review and was the subject of much media comment and criticism at the time.[201][202][203] According to Dahl, until this point in time “a race of people”, meaning Jews, had never “switched so rapidly from much-pitied victims to barbarous murderers”. The empathy of all after the Holocaust had turned “into hatred and revulsion”.[202] Dahl wrote that Clifton’s book would make readers “violently anti-Israeli”, saying, “I am not anti-Semitic. I am anti-Israel.”[204] He asked, “must Israel, like Germany, be brought to her knees before she learns how to behave in this world?”.[205] The United States, he said, was “so utterly dominated by the great Jewish financial institutions” that “they dare not defy” Israelis.[202]

Following the Literary Review article, Dahl told a journalist from the New Statesman: “There’s a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity, maybe it’s a kind of lack of generosity towards non-Jews. I mean there is always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason.”[206][207] In 1990, during an interview with The Independent, Dahl explained that his issue with Israel began when they invaded Lebanon in 1982:

they killed 22,000 civilians when they bombed Beirut. It was very much hushed up in the newspapers because they are primarily Jewish-owned. I’m certainly anti-Israeli and I’ve become antisemitic in as much as that you get a Jewish person in another country like England strongly supporting Zionism. I think they should see both sides. It’s the same old thing: we all know about Jews and the rest of it. There aren’t any non-Jewish publishers anywhere, they control the media—jolly clever thing to do—that’s why the president of the United States has to sell all this stuff to Israel.”

[Wikipedia; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roald_Dahl]

Dahl was, in his own view, anti-Israel but not, or not necessarily, anti-Jew. Organized Jewish-Zionist lobbyists disagree, and have created a campaign against him, as seen in that Wikipedia article. His books have been savagely cut and changed, for one thing. Akin to burning books…

As for me, and as far as I can recall, I had actually never heard of Roald Dahl until I was about 25, and at that time (about 1982) had a girlfriend (7 years older) who had two young children, both of whom loved Dahl’s books. Since then, I have read Dahl’s short WW2 memoir (he was a fighter pilot at first; later, a junior air attache at the British Embassy in Washington).

The “Israelis” have a lot to answer for in this world.

Truth is often stranger than fiction.

An impressive show or display, but what does it mean in “the real world”?

Late music

31 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 18 November 2024”

  1. “What would be the American reaction if Russia gave the same help to Venezuela, Cuba etc?”

    A while ago I was talking to an idiot mainstream conservative type individual, and I asked him what his reaction would be if Canada or Mexico stopped selling oil to the USA.

    He started ranting angrily about how that would be an act of war and the USA should invade any country that refuses to sell us oil.

    I then pointed out that Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and declared war on the USA for precisely that reason: the USA had arranged an oil embargo of Japan, with the intent of starving the Japanese economy of fuel, thus forcing Japan into submission.

    I asked him whether, in his view, Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor was justified, considering that he just said refusing to sell oil to a country is an act of war.

    There was much incoherent mumbling, since this individual was unwilling to admit that he had been revealed as a hypocrite.

    On a related note, I find it very interesting how mainstream American liberal Harris-voter types have basically morphed into full-blown Bush/Cheney-style neocons who want to attack every country which doesn’t bow to American (((cultural marxist))) supremacy.

    A few decades ago, American liberals were pacifist antiwar types (or at least claimed to be).

    These days, American liberals essentially have Bush/Cheney foreign policy views: attack and crush any country that challenges the USA, and force the entire world to embrace (((cultural marxism))), especially (((LGBTQ))) and (((race-mixing))).

    In the current American political environment, there is no difference between nominally “Republican” neocons such as Nikki Haley and nominally “Democrat” neolibs such as Biden/Harris. Both groups are united in their goal to establish (((ZOG))) global supremacy and force (((cultural marxism))) on the entire world. They hate Russia and China and North Korea and Iran because those countries are resisting (((ZOG))) and (((cultural marxism))).

    It’s truly fascinating to see the liberals let their mask slip and reveal themselves as full-blown Cheney-style warmongers. Indeed, Dick Cheney and Liz Cheney both endorsed Kamala Harris.

    On liberal Internet forums, the liberals openly fantasize about nuking Moscow, breaking Russia up into 100 smaller countries controlled by the USA, going to war with China over Taiwan, attacking Iran, invading Venezuela to control their oil, and various other (((ZOG))) goals.

    It certainly seems like the liberals have never actually been pacifists, but were only pretending.

    Now that they perceive (((REDACTED))) world supremacy to be within reach, they have dropped the pacifist facade and revealed themselves as the warmongering neoliberal/neocon psychopaths that they really are.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Friend of Britain:
      If Russia were to be broken up, e.g. after extreme stress such as nuclear or other war, it might devolve into smaller units for a period, true, but what would happen were the USA to be put under similar stress? Dystopian civil conflict lasting for many years?

      Like

  2. Even by the normal low standards of the Democratic Party (only Jimmy Carter was relatively decent and had quite a good knowledge of world affairs) Biden is a God awful Castlemain XXXX. An Irish-American with their usual chip on the shoulder attitudes to Britain he shows a distinct disliking for us.

    Both America and the world is well shot of him. Allowing Ukraine to use those missiles is very unwise. There is quite a risk Putin will not take it lying down should these weapons land in Moscow or any other important Russian city. This could be the spark that engulfs Europe in flames once again.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. John:
      It remains uncertain. Russia and Moscow are inseparable, from the Russian perspective, whereas other historically-Russian cities, such as Kiev, Minsk, and others, are not.

      If Moscow came under real and immediate threat, I mean in terms of Central Moscow (Kremlin and radius of about 2-3 miles), Kiev might be toast. Almost literally. However, lesser threats or attacks will be greeted, probably, with patience, at least until Trump takes the reins.

      After all, if push comes to shove, Russia has enough nuclear power to completely destroy Kiev and all other Ukrainian cities. Russia cannot lose this war *unless* there is a palace (or real) revolution in Moscow, which seems unlikely.

      Like

  3. The Zionists love to insinuate that anyone who opposes the brutality/abject cruelty of the Zionist state, its continual defiance of international law, its persecution of Palestinians is a rabid ‘anti-semite’. Whilst some do use anti-Zionism as a cover for their anti-Semitism it isn’t true of all.

    Not least because some Jews oppose the expansionist, domineering, supremacist Zionist philosophy:

    https://twitter.com/TorahJudaism

    Like

  4. It looks like Biden is determined to start WW3 during the dying days of his Presidency. We can only hope Putin makes some allowance for Biden’s dementia if a missle does strike Moscow or St Petersburg and kills Russians.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. John:
      Putin must realize that Trump will probably row back from the madness of King Biden, so he has only to wait for 8-9 weeks and (presumably) the supply of American arms will slow and possibly stop.

      Zelensky’s only hope is to drag NATO into war with Russia, directly. He may even fire upon the centre of Moscow to do that. Obviously, Putin has enormous tactical and strategic forces at his command, notably the Strategic Rocket Forces with their nuclear missiles (maybe as many as 6,000), but I do not think that he will flatten Kiev unless Moscow itself comes under devastating attack. Time is on Putin’s side, both in terms of the upcoming Trump presidency and in terms of the Kiev regime running out of cannon-fodder.

      Like

      1. If only dementia-addled Biden and unelected, anti-British wanker, Two Tier Keir, would just do the decent thing at long last and just die. Evil warmongers!

        Alex Salmond died recently and although I profoundly disagreed with his politics, he was not evil like Biden and Keir Starmer are.

        It was a shame the usually jovial and good natured Salmond did not put his undoubted political talents to better use.

        Like

      2. The problem is that senile Biden, Macron and that no real democratic mandate, anti-British bastard, vile Starmer creature are determined to start WW3 before January’s inauguration of President-elect Trump. Biden is pissed-off Kamala failed to win and hates Trump and his supporters (“garbage” he called them) with a burning passion so WW3 it is then.

        Why does the USA take so long to inaugerate its presidents?

        Like

      3. That is what Zelensky plans to do which is why it is so grotetesquely irresponsible of Biden and perhaps Macron/Starmer to give him those type of missles. He just can’t be trusted to use them in an appropriate way. Scholz sees this hence his refusal to give Zelensky Taurus missles.

        Like

  5. I see that the gormless prick that the globalist, anti-British, fake Conservative Party has appointed as Shadow Defence Secretary has welcomed Biden’s grotesquely irresponsible move and wants us to follow.

    Why can’t Tory cretins like him just eff off and die in a ditch somewhere? These supremely arrogant morons have learnt ZILCH since their worst election result since 1832. He might want to die in a NATO ‘proxy’ war against Russia but I and millions of sensible Britons do NOT.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. We need to withdraw from NATO as soon as possible before WW3 erupts. We should have withdrawn from it as soon as the Warsaw Pact ended in 1989/1990. There is no need for NATO to exist now that all the countries of Eastern Europe are democracies (apart from Belarus) and not in Soviet orbit as they once were.

    Like

  7. If the no real mandate to govern us Two Tier Keir Starmer creature gets us involved in a nuclear war with Russia as a result of NATO’s irresponsibilty he should be made to suffer the ‘ultimate punishment’ along with the Tory traitors in parliament who will no doubt help him as that gormless, evil prick, Iain Dumbo-Smith, helped Bliar in taking this country into a totally unecessary war against Iraq.

    It is high time these people paid for their crimes.

    https://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org

    Like

    1. Starmer is clearly star struck, since he has been PM he has appeared all over the world. Maybe he is drunk on power? Having his photo taken with world leaders is more appealing than addressing the mess he has created here. His absence today is particularly galling, he is a real pipsqueak ducking out to avoid the farmers.

      A man with no ideas and a coward.

      Like

      1. Whilst I can not stand Two Tier Kier, his obvious wanting to be at the centre of attention on various around the world tours and being star struck in the presence of world leaders whilst neglecting our myriad of problems at home is something he has in common with 99% of British PMs.

        The last PM who wasn’t particularly like that was Mrs Thatcher and then you have to go way back to humane and self-effacing Neville Chamberlain, David Lloyd George etc.

        The only good thing about Keir is that he is at least British. It is a very weird turn of events where you have to vote Labour, Reform UK, Lib Dem or even for God’s sake the ultra liberal-left Green Party if you want a British PM.

        The so-called Conservative Party is a TOTAL FARCE!

        Like

      2. Drunk on power would be one very credible explanation. You only have to look at the way he has treated members of his own party to realise his tryannical character leanings. Hundreds, if not thousands, of Labour Party members have been expelled on his watch for mostly silly and irrelevant policy differences particularly over the Israel/Palestine question including even decent, NON ZIONIST Jews! That is how commited he is to always taking the side of the Zionist bandit state. These expulsions go way beyond the normal internal dicipline issues/procedures all political parties have.

        Like

  8. Chancellor Scholz has said a firm NEIN to supplying missles which can strike inside Russia. No doubt nodding dog Starmer will allow any missles we have left (can there be any?) to be supplied thereby making us a nuclear target.

    Like

  9. It is utterly ludicrous, fundamentally irrational and insane how a country can be made a nuclear target, become embroiled in a needless war due to the actions of a PM and party that ‘won’ a general election where just 33.7% of people voting voted for them.

    We really do need Proportional Representation/fair votes NOW!

    https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk

    Like

  10. I see that the failed Tory cretin, Ben Wallace, has ranted on X about Chancellor Scholz refusing to supply missles to hit targets inside Russia. His last demeaning remark about Scholz is that he would be better at chairing a parish council sub comittee. Well, at least in Germany those councils are democratically elected as they use Proportional Representation for all elections unlike this severely undemocratic ‘country’ and you, Mr Wallace, was about council level yourself if that!

    Liked by 1 person

      1. A Grade A one in his case. It seems like many of our defence people are complete pricks. No wonder the army, navy and airforce have severe recruitment problems when cheeky idiots like that are in authority over recruits along with the fact that due to decades of Tory and Labour misrule there is barely much of a country left to defend.

        Like

      2. John:
        The armed forces are having recruitment problems for two main reasons: firstly, because the pay and conditions (for the rank and file) are not very good, and that applies particularly to the housing of married soldiers and others; secondly, because there is a morale problem, meaning soldiers thinking about whether what they are doing is worthwhile. The SAS may (one reads) sometimes say “Who Cares Who Wins”, but that is, if said, offset by their superior pay and other perks. Also, by the consciousness of being in an elite group. The mass of the armed service people are in a far worse state.

        Like

      3. Unlike Wallace, Scholz is taking into account the interests of his own country. With Wallace and other ‘modern’ (whatever crap that is supposed to mean) Tories, Britain comes LAST everytime. That might be one reason why so few people wish to vote for them nowadays.

        Like

      4. With regard to the popular image of the Guards officers as nincompoops I remembered this witty observation: “You can always tell a Guards officer, but you cannot tell him much” (LOL)

        Like

      5. Claudius:
        Very good.

        Sometime in the 1980s, I was having a drink at the Ritz in London with a Polish woman, when a young man wearing a bowler hat (or Coke hat —pronounced “Cook”), now almost exclusively the preserve of off-duty Guards officers, if even they still wear them in 2024) entered and, on being greeted by his half-dozen friends, took off his bowler and threw it like a frisbee towards them.

        I am not sure these days what a Guards officer is meant to be guarding— the pathetic remnant of “royalty”? Certainly not the Empire— that’s long gone, and England/Britain is surely going…

        Like

    1. Claudius:
      I see what you mean. A Danish “princess” of the people.

      I was unaware that Miss Universe was still around. Is Miss World also still there?

      When she was young (meaning around 1971 or 1972), and working as a fashion model, my wife was asked by Eric Morley and his wife whether she might like to try to go for Miss World, but their suggestion was declined.

      Ah, I see now that Miss World *is* still around:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_World
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Morley
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Morley

      Like

  11. With regard to the British military’s recruitment problems, it’s not surprising considering that British troops are sent thousands of miles away to die in (((REDACTED))) supremacist wars, while the politicians flood Britain with foreign invaders.

    The British military’s motto might as well be: “Join up and get sent overseas to die for (((REDACTED))) supremacy, while your own government brainwashes your wife and children into hating themselves for being White, while importing violent foreigners who will rape your family!”

    Hardly a message that will encourage many people to join the military.

    With regard to (((Zelensky))), the manpower situation in Ukraine does seem dire. (((Zelensky))) recently signed a new law allowing foreigners to serve as officers in the Ukrainian military. Previously, foreigners could only serve as enlisted personnel. I wonder how many of the new foreign officers will be (((dual citizen))) types from a certain small country in the Middle East.

    Let’s remember that the entire Ukraine war started in 2014 because the (((NATO)))-controlled Ukrainian government refused to allow 3 small areas of the country (Crimea, and around 1/3 of Luhansk and Donetsk) to peacefully and democratically secede, even though those areas have huge pro-Russian majorities.

    If the Ukrainian government had simply allowed those 3 small areas to democratically secede, there would be no war, and Ukraine would be at peace with Russia.

    Instead, the Ukrainian government, goaded by (((NATO))), declared the pro-Russian majority in Crimea, Luhansk, and Donetsk to be “terrorists”, and viciously started attacking and launching artillery strikes on these areas.

    Then in 2019, Ukraine doubled down on stupidity by electing the globalist (((REDACTED))) comedian (((Zelensky))) as president, assuming that the election was even honest, which is questionable.

    Fast forward 5 years, and large parts of Ukraine are have been occupied and annexed by Russia, even larger parts of Ukraine are ravaged by war, many Ukrainian cities are in ruins, the Ukrainian economy is destroyed and completely dependent on foreign aid, millions of Ukrainians have fled the country, and 500,000 to 1,000,000 Ukrainian men are dead. (((Zelensky))) undoubtedly plans to replace them with muslim and African immigrants.

    I hope it was worth it, Ukrainians. All you had to do was let Crimea and 1/3 of Donetsk and Luhansk peacefully secede, as the overwhelming majority in those areas voted for democratically.

    But instead, you chose to declare those pro-Russian areas as “terrorists” and try to force them to remain part of Ukraine.

    Now Ukraine is devastated by war and huge numbers of your men are dead, with no end in sight, as the (((REDACTED))) commissar (((Zelensky))) sends ever more Ukrainian men to die for (((globalism))).

    And when you die fighting a pointless war against Russia, (((Zelensky))) will import muslims and africans to marry your widows.

    Is it worth it, Ukrainians? Are you still glad that you voted for the (((REDACTED))) comedian?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The CIA manipulated the ‘Velvet Revolution’ in 2014 and topled their then government which wanted peaceful relations with Russia. They done this because America wants to take Russia down at the very least if not balkanise it into several states. Russia under Putin can see what the ultimate aim is and is resisting it.

      Behind the scenes, Roosevelt helped to push Europe over the edge into war in 1939 to increase American power. This time, Biden is risking a nuclear conflict here.

      The American government and its military-industrial complex needs to leave Europe alone. NATO should be dismantled and instead the EU with Britain joining in that part at least should get on with developing its own common foreign and security policy which is a stance they have wanted to do for ages. Perhaps, if Putin is removed and Russia becomes a proper democracy they will wish to also join.

      A United Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok free at last from American CIA/Zionist/military-industrial complex manipulation.

      Like

Leave a reply to John Cancel reply