Diary Blog, 23 January 2025

Afternoon music

[purifying lemniscate waterfall]

Talking point

A commentary on Donald Trump, relayed to me by a reader of the blog: https://nationalvanguard.org/2025/01/keep-talkin-trash-donald/.

Worth reading.

Written, I now see, by the well-known Kevin Alfred Strom [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom], and I now also see from Wikipedia that he was a colleague of a Dr. Fields [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Reed_Fields], a short and rather fat man (if memory serves; I may be wrong on that) when I heard him speak, and to whom I was introduced, at one of the regular evening meetings of the League of St. George, which were held at Kensington Library (London) in the mid-1970s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Saint_George. At the time, I was a member of the League.

I recall Dr. Fields as having been dressed in a white or cream suit (and possibly hat as well, I do not remember; I think so), and with a large flag on a stick sticking out of his lapel pocket. I cannot now quite remember whether the flag was the Stars and Stripes or the Confederate flag.

Fields was introduced to the audience as the representative of something called the National States’ Rights Party [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_States%27_Rights_Party].

Remarkably, Fields is still around, according to Wikipedia, and aged 92; he looked at least in late middle-age when I met him in the mid-1970s, but must in fact have been only about 45.

Tweets seen

(((Mafia)))…

See also:

Talking point

The exact statistics may differ slightly from that; more or less right, though. My view is that it makes little difference whether the migrant-invader millions are labelled “legal” or “illegal”.

More tweets seen

Trump on the line?

How can France imprison Musk when he is not even in France? Macron and his EU cabal must be getting desperate.

I wrote about Macron’s strange background years ago:

Southport will consume everyone today but 12 yo Leo, murdered 2 days ago in cold blood returning from school – only a short walk home – adored by all and described by his Head as funny & sweet will fall back. I took my son to school and back without fail at that age, I could not let go of him.

While understandable anxiety from a mother, and in a London which is now somewhere between a jungle and a zoo (I believe that she lives in West Kensington), 12-year-old boys surely do not need their mothers to escort them everywhere.

I was 12 in September 1968. My family was then living in Sydney, N.S.W. I would occasionally travel into the city centre (now, but not then, called the “CBD” or Central Business District), taking the ferry across Sydney Harbour from Cremorne Point to Circular Quay, a 3-mile trip. I even did it when aged only 11. I would then wander around Sydney’s central area, going wherever the mood took me.

I can remember going into a bookshop (I bought a book on Arabic, for no good reason), the offices of the Swiss Bank Corporation, and the very lively Stock Exchange (mining stocks were booming at the time, and the part of the trading floor dealing with them was frenetic, seen by me though the glass window of the public gallery).

[1966 photo of the ferry in Mosman Bay near Cremorne Point. My family lived in Mosman in 1967, then moved about a quarter-mile to the next suburb, Cremorne]
Cremorne Point wharf before the First World War, a view which was still somewhat recognizable (at least the general situation and the ferry pontoon) when I used it a few times in 1967-69. You could see little sharks swimming in the water, and the pontoon swayed as the ferry came in]
[in some more recent year; in 1967, the pontoon wharf was not covered or glassed-in]

Reverting to my main point, when I was only just 13 (by about 2 weeks), and on my family’s return trip by sea to the UK (we had arrived by air), my parents let me walk around alone on the various stops the liner Oriana made en voyage, including Acapulco (at that time not the large and crime-ridden city it now is, admittedly) and Miami (which involved my taking, entirely alone, both a local bus in Port Everglades and then a Greyhound bus to central Miami, and the same in reverse; the ship was scheduled to depart that same evening!).

I have to admit that, if I had a boy of 12-13, I would probably not give him quite that amount of latitude. I think that my main point is still valid. At some point, children (especially boys) have to be given the chance to look after themselves by wandering around etc.

Stray reminiscence

The above recollections sparked another reminiscence of my few years of Australian childhood (aged 10-13).

My parents always had a range of friends, and in Sydney one of those (met via my Anglo-Australian uncle, a business executive) was a barrister called Johnny Szabo, of Hungarian origin. I believe that he and his brother had taken the opportunity to leave socialist Hungary in or following the Uprising of 1956. Before that, Szabo had fought as a tank commander in the Second World War, alongside German forces.

As I understand, the Szabo brothers at first operated a repair garage or body shop in Sydney but, by the mid-1960s, Johnny Szabo was a prominent barrister who, I think I was told, took silk (was appointed QC). I do not really remember him except by name and story, though. I vaguely recall having met him once or twice. I imagine that he must have been born around 1920, so would now be long gone.

It does show how Australia was a land of opportunity for many after 1945. Wolf Blass, the German winemaker of note, would be another example. He arrived in South Australia almost penniless in 1961. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_Blass. https://www.wolfblass.com/en-gb/about/our-history.html.

Some say “what about black/brown immigrants in the UK or mainland Europe? Are they not similar?” Answer—“NO…” They are, many of them, perhaps most, heavy millstones round the collective neck of the European people(s).

London. Zoo.

Youths“? No mention of the racial background, not even by the tweeters themselves. #Brainwashed…

Talking point

“They” are still pumping out propaganda (writing books, making films etc) about the defaults, whether real or imagined, of the Third Reich, yet look at their own behaviour…

More tweets seen

[No, wait! I voted Labour in 2024!“]

Let us say, for the sake of argument, that the aforesaid untermensch had not killed anyone. Would there, even then, be any reason for the British people to tolerate his presence, that of his family and clan or, for that matter, others, being in the UK, or in any part of Europe? I say not.

The only reasonable agreement will be for the Kiev regime to withdraw its capital to Lvov, though with authority over all Ukrainian territory west of the Dnieper except for the cities of Kiev and Odessa, which should be declared free cities, or having condominium status. Russia to rule all of Ukraine east of the Dnieper and also a corridor of land along the Black Sea coast, both east and west of Odessa.

If that is implemented, and with Kiev-regime losses at or beyond the present level, it could spell demographic catastrophe for Ukraine.

That will turn South Africa, at long last, into the usual African-ruled “basket case”, of course. The dwindling white minority has kept South Africa at least semi-civilized since that idiot Mandela took over in the early 1990s, but whites have been emigrating in very large numbers since then. Eventually, perhaps not long in the future, the chaos and misrule, in some cases amounting to savagery, seen in most of black Africa will engulf South Africa. Once European/white rule ended, that was always going to be the endgame.

Late music

24 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 23 January 2025”

  1. The Zionists learnt well from the National Socialists. Zionism is basically a Jewish form of National Socialism/Nazism what with its ultra-nationalism, territorial expansionism, breaking of international law, genocidal intent towards a minority ie Palestinians and the Kibbutz concept. The Kibbutz puts the idea of the ‘common good before the private good’ socialist ideal into the Zionist state.

    The Zionist entity would never have been created were it not for Hitler and his National Socialist party. During the war the Zionists from the World Zionist Organisation knew the Holocaust was taking place yet they deliberately lobbied Western governments to refuse admission to Jewish asylum seekers knowing that a higher death toll would only bolster their case for the establishment of a settler/colonial Zionist/Jewish homeland in the Near/Middle East at a time in world history when the colonial Empires were being run down.

    Adolf Eichmann knew this and he planned to reveal it to the world during his trial in Israel. That was one reason Zionist judges there gave him the death penalty when capital punishment had only been given to just one other person in the state’s history and the concept of the death penalty and its practice is repugnant to Jews as it apparently goes against the main tenets of the Jewish religion.

    Then there is the murky business of Der Fuhrer himself. Despite his being one of the most significant figures in world history and being born well over a century ago now his real ancestry is still shrouded in mystery. Was he at least partially Jewish himself and a self-hating one? Often you will find the most ‘anti-semitic’ people do have some Jewish ancestry. Certainly in his appearance in films, photographs ect he looked very far from the Aryan ideal. You would think that by now with over a century of time elapsing after his birth the Fuhrer’s real ancestry would be known.

    Was the Nazi Party funded by Zionists? Zionists are many things but they are normally diabolically clever, resourceful and pretty cunning.

    To be frank, I do not know why the Zionists do not erect a statue to Adolf in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Without him and his actions there would be no Zionist entity and a ‘Vatican for World Zionism’ as the Israeli state has been called.

    Like

  2. Whilst I am not male model material myself, that Southport killer is an ugly bastard. Many of these immigrants are not exactly adding to the asthetic qualities of the British population, are they?🙄🙄🙄🙄 If we are forced to accept huge levels of immigration, then can we at least ensure those coming in are attractive specimens of humanity ie from Sweden or somewhere like that!🙄🙄🙄

    Like

    1. There is a wish on the part of some of their politicians and people to join the EU but if it came to a referendum before membership was gained as we should have had but did not thanks to Edward Heath then the proposal might be voted down. A lot of Serbs are Eurosceptics and look Eastwards towards Russia rather than towards Western Europe. Serbs regard Russia as a fellow Slavic ‘brother nation’.

      Like

      1. Yet millions of Muslims live happily in Russia. Regarding looking East or West, Serbs will look in any direction that benefits their criminal enterprises.

        Like

    2. Are there any Europeans you like? Serbs might well have said the same about Americans when NATO bombed the hell out of Serbia in 1999 over Kosovo. That was the start of Tony Bliar’s numerous stupid and wicked foreign adventures which we should have stayed out of. If Serbs hate Britain today then it would be Bliar’s fault.

      Like

  3. Further down the ‘Alice in Wonderland’ slide we go:

    https://www.c4m.org.uk/the-state-mustnt-legalise-more-family-fiction

    https://www.c4m.org.uk

    Where is Kemi Badenoch on this being as she is the ‘anti-woke warrier’ of our times?

    She is inconsistent and incoherent in opposing ‘gender ideology’ whilst she personally and her party backs same-sex marriage.

    Transexuals have always existed in society but this truly tiny 0.5% minority did not cause any problems or gave rise to what is nowadays called ‘gender ideology’ untill same-sex marriage was made legal by the Tories in 2013.

    Marriage as it was traditionally understood was based-upon the complimentary nature of two distinct biological sexes. Then the legal definition of this gendered institution was altered to make it gender-neutral hence enabling the rise of ‘gender ideology’ and confusion in society about gender and the role that someone being a boy/man or girl/woman plays in society.

    It really is not a surprise that ‘gender ideology’ has only really arisen since same-sex marriage was introduced. Civil partnerships/civil unions were the right way for the state to recognise gay relationships and it should have been left at that.

    Alice Weidel is the lesbian candidate for Germany’s Chancellorship in February’s general election from the nationalist/national-conservative Alternative Fur Deutschland partei (AfD). As a party the Afd is opposed to same-sex marriage but is supportive of civil partnerships/civil unions. In its manifesto this year they define the basic societal building block of the family as a man, a woman and children.

    Like

  4. An interesting video uploaded by my Romanian friend Emil. It shows that nothing has changed with Trump, the USA would always bully other nations to accept their demands, that is what they call “negotiating”. Do you think Putin will be scared? I don´t think so…

    Like

    1. That will never work with Russia. As I said yesterday the Russians have always been a proud nation even when they were part of a multi-national state but now they are within their own nation state they are an even more proud nation. Added to the self-discovery of themselves in a nation state of their own they have a strong leader in Putin who makes them feel a great sense of national pride and self-belief. His pride in his nation rubs off on them so they rally around him. His personality cult is on the same level as that surrounding Der Fuhrer if not more so. The Russians are not a people who will willingly submit themselves to a foreign bully. This has been the case in the past and is even more so now under a leader in Putin who is a father figure of the nation and the personification of beloved ‘Mother Russia’ to them.

      America really needs to learn to not bully other countries. Whilst that does work with many it will not work with some especially those who have a lot of national pride like Russians do.

      Like

    2. No, Putin will not be scared and ordinary Russians won’t be either. If they could hold off the huge armed might of Nazi Germany eventually and win against them after being deceived by Hitler as to his true intentions then they will not be frightened by America. If I were America, I would watch out. You may have just met your match.

      I expect though that Trump’s threats towards Russia will not amount to much in the end since the USA normally only tries to bully/pick upon/invade nations it thinks it can beat easily ie the Commonwealth realm of Grenada in 1983, Nicaragua, Iraq etc. Russia or China are in a differrent category.

      Like

  5. Yes, no mention of the ethnicity of the numerous manic stabbers we have now who are mainly ethnic. Certainly, there are plenty of our own scumbags who commit these crimes but then as we have singularly failed to control British criminals that is all the more reason to stop importing more people from violent and backward cultures like Somalia.

    One in 12 illegal immigrants in London just goes to prove how utterly hopeless at getting a grip with illegal migration Labour and fake Conservatives are. What a total disgrace! Some may have terroristic inclinations against us like that Saudi Arabian guy did in Magdeburg. The AfD in Germany wants mass deportations and if anything we need it more than the Germans do.

    Like

    1. John:
      Well, it has been clear since the early 1960s that “if you want a n***** for a neighbour, vote Labour”. That, I think, has been proven right, and in, er, spades…

      Unfortunately, the same is now also true of the “Conservatives”, LibDems, and Greens and, to be frank, I do not trust Reform UK either…

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yes, how accurate that Tory slogan in Smethwick was in 1964. As you say, it is true of all the parties now. The Tories have completely succumbed to the liberal globalist philosophy.

        Like

  6. As Ann Widdecombe says the government on behalf of the wellbeing of children in particular and that of society as a whole should be allowed to have a preferred model by rejecting the legalisation of same-sex marriage. She and one of the other few real Tories left, Sir John Hayes MP, are much more socially conservative than I am on this question. I do not see anything wrong with same-sex civil partnerships/civil unions but they are against them.

    Infact, Ann Widdecombe when she was an MP voted against all the liberal reforms that have taken place since the 1990’s. No wonder she is not a Tory member now. She and Thatcher would nowadays be refused membership of the Conservative Party.

    Like

  7. “Ukraine is in the final stages of drafting a conscription reform to attract 18-25 year-olds who are currently exempt from mobilization, the Associated Press reports .”

    The (((goal))) of the (((Zelensky))) regime is to kill off all the White males, so (((Zelensky))) will have an excuse to import millions of african and muslim men to marry the Ukrainian women.

    Undoubtedly, (((Zelensky))) is already preparing a speech saying “we need immigrants to rebuild the economy and replace all the war dead! Ukraine is just an idea, not an ethnicity! The original Ukrainians were black!”

    In other words, the same (((subversive script))) that the (((REDACTEDS))) use in every other Western country.

    I wonder if the Ukrainian people regret voting for this clown in 2019, assuming the election was actually honest, which is questionable at best.

    And of course (((Zelensky))) cancelled the 2024 election (violating the constitution), and now he rules as an unelected tyrant.

    The war is no excuse for cancelling the election: Russia only controls around 20% of Ukraine. There is nothing to prevent an election from being held in the other 80%.

    The USA even held a presidential election (in the North) during the War Between The States, in 1864. Since the USA could hold a presidential election in the midst of a civil war with primitive 1800s era technology, surely the Ukrainians could have managed to easily hold an election with modern computerized technology.

    The reason (((Zelensky))) cancelled the 2024 election is that he knew he would lose, because the Ukrainian people are tired of their men being used as cannon fodder in an unnecessary (((NATO))) proxy war.

    It reminds me of how the arch-traitor Winston Churchill cancelled the general election during World War 2. No part of Britain was occupied by Germany, and an election could easily have been held.

    But Churchill knew that the British people would throw him out, which is what happened when the election finally happened in 1945, despite Churchill’s attempts to postpone it indefinitely.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Friend of Britain:
      I think that you may be right about the Jew Zelensky importing blacks and browns.

      I saw report of an opinion poll from Kiev saying that Zelensky’s popular support is about 17%.

      As you say, Zelensky is now ruling as a tyrannical dictator. You must of course have noticed that 99% of the Jews on Twitter/X overtly support “Ukraine” (Zelensky’s regime).

      Russian forces *must* push on to victory. The Kiev regime is on the back foot. An immediate peace will only give Zelensky the chance to regroup, re-equip, resupply, and invite NATO troops in to bolster defences.

      Like

      1. America should send troops and a lot more money to Ukraine. After all, this is a ‘proxy war’ by the US designed to weaken Russia and the European Union/Europe in the furtherance of America’s perceived national interests. Ukraine is just the poor satrap caught in the middle.

        Like

    2. He had no need to call an election and it would have made no difference at any rate since we had the profoundly undemocratic stand alone, ‘pure’ FPTP electoral system in place then as we do now which CRUSHES alternative parties and political diversity out of sight which is, of course, one of the primary reasons the Tories and Labour love it so much. Funnily enough, these hypocritical, self-serving, profoundly undemocratic and anti-British wankers love diversity when it comes to immigration or sexual orientation but when it comes to creating a political system that would enable the very real and significantly varied opinions of the British electorate to be properly represented in the House of Commons through changing FPTP to Proportional Representation/fair votes these normally very keen advocates of the merits of ‘diversity’ go all cold on the concept.

      https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk

      https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk

      Also, we had a three party national coalition government at the time. Churchill was not just leading a Tory government but one including Labour and the Liberal Party. This also shows Tory and Labour hypocrisy. There is no reason why we can’t have co-operation and collaborative government in peacetime as well as in war circumstances. Germany has had two or three ‘Grand Coalition’ governments between their version of the Tories ie the CDU/CSU and the Labour Party ie the SPD and it can work well.

      The only time we have had a coalition government in peacetime was the Tory/Lib Dem one from 2010 to 2015. I opposed a lot of its policies but it did work pretty well and was stable. It lasted the entire five year term which was not the prediction of many (normally those who are fanatical opponents of PR) who said it would collapse within months.

      Going back to the topic at hand, the biggest fault here lies not with Churchill but Neville Chamberlain. He should have called an early general election after signing the Munich Agreement where we offered the hand of friendship to Germany which was later rejected. The Agreement was immensely popular in Britain with virtually everyone supporting it apart from the usual cranks, oddballs and warmongering cretins. Indeed, it was so popular with ordinary people and the Royal Family that they done something they very much should not have done ie King George VI and the late Queen Mother invited Neville Chamberlain onto the central balcony of Buckingham Palace that overlooks the Mall to receive the acclaim of the mass public crowds there who were cheering Chamberlain to the rafters. This was considered to be a constitutional outrage as it was thought to show bias and undue favouritism from the unelected Royals to a serving, elected PM. Even now, it is thought to be one of the worst if not THE worst constitutional outrages the Royal Family have ever committed and attracts controversy.

      If Chamberlain had called an early general election on this issue of foreign policy in these circumstances his Conservative Party would have won an utterly huge landslide victory and might well have won 500 plus seats which would have decimated the emerging Labour Party and prevented it from winning a general election until the late 1950’s or even later. Also, many of the warmongers in parliament would have lost their seats. Churchill might well have lost his constituency in Epping. The Tory association in his electorate in the 1930’s tried to deselect him on several occasions. Chamberlain calling an early general election on the issue of foreign policy in the few weeks or months after signing the wildly popular Munich Agreement might well have made those attempts successful.

      Like

  8. In other news, the jihadists now in charge of Syria are planning to rapidly (((privatize))) Syria’s economy (even the sea ports), and dismantle the Ba’ath system of state ownership of major assets.

    Undoubtedly, the jihadists have been told that if they (((privatize))) Syria’s assets and let (((multi-national corporations))) rape the country, the sanctions will be lifted.

    And of course, the jihadists are eager and willing to do the bidding of their (((masters))).

    The new jihadist foreign minister even attended the World Economic Forum in Davos and made a speech.

    Jihadists enthusiastically implementing neoliberal “free market” economic policies, and making speeches at Davos.

    You couldn’t make this stuff up!

    Maybe Al-Jolani is trying to earn the title: “the Syrian Margaret Thatcher.”

    https://www.ft.com/content/43746784-4e14-4c70-a6be-1aa849cd66ee

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, you are right and it was to be expected. In the XIX century, the British cleverly organised and supported liberal (i.e.: treacherous, pro-British) parties in the countries they wanted to control for economic and strategic reasons. In those days at least they tried to keep the appearances, nowadays they bomb the hell out of you.

      Globalism (i.e.: Worldwide Financial Control and Tyranny) is a system designed and controlled by “the usual suspects”; however is bound to fail because their greed blinds them making them careless. Sooner or later they will crash.

      Like

Leave a reply to Ian Millard Cancel reply