Morning music
Talking point
Featured on the blog on 13 August 2023:
Tweets seen
Will Trump cut off arms and ammunition to the Kiev regime? That is the way to stop the killing, or much of it.
The “freedom of the Press” is largely a mirage. The Jew-Zionist cabals control or strongly influence much of it in the West, especially in the USA and UK. There is also the point that connected groups, families etc own the main newspapers and magazines— Times, Telegraph, Mail etc.
More tweets seen
A Canadian medical study. Even now, in the UK as in the USA, one sees that cannabis use/abuse has a particularly bad effect, on the blacks particularly and non-whites generally, groups anyway far more likely to suffer from schizophrenia than white people (Europeans).
“If a grown man believes that he is a woman, and takes steps to live his life to reflect that? Good for him. None of my business, it has absolutely nothing to do with me. However, when the rest of society is bullied into submission to accommodate that – we should draw the line. We should not tolerate being forced to call them women. It’s just not true. Certainly not allowing access to women’s sport, where a biological male has vast physical advantages. Trump’s position on this is the right one – it should be banned. It is entirely unfair and unjust. Women-only spaces must remain solely for women. The policing of our language on this, particularly in a medical context, has to stop. It’s dangerous, warped and does not represent actual reality. Men cannot get pregnant, and women cannot have a penis. Sorry, but that’s just a fact. And most of all? Stop forcing the idea that we can be born in the ‘wrong’ bodies on impressionable children. That poison needs to be kept AWAY from schools – ban it, and sack anyone in any position of authority who forces it on young boys and girls, potentially leading to permanent life-altering medical procedures. Grown adults are free to live their lives however they choose, but do not expect the rest of the country to change how it operates to accommodate this. We need to be respectful of individual choices, but we must not deny reality.”
[Rupert Lowe MP, Reform UK]
See also:
The “@louderry” tweeter ignores the fact (as she would, as a Labour-label supporter) that the continuing mass immigration or migration-invasion renders otiose any governmental plans to “bring in investment and fund public services” (even if Labour had any such plan, which I doubt).
The public services, in all senses, from NHS and police to water supplies and housing, are swamped, and will be swamped even more, by the ever-rising migrant tide. A million a year, in rough figures.
You still see tweets, or comments on rigged TV panel “discussion” shows, that the only reasons people don’t want mass immigration are because they do not want Indian or Pakistani NHS doctors with doubtful standards, or because they do not want to see blacks wandering about in their local area. Partly, yes, perhaps (and why should they have to tolerate that anyway?), but mainly it is because to import a population, every single year, the equivalent in size to that of Birmingham, or twice the size of that presently inhabiting Manchester, is a sure-fire recipe for total disaster.
It makes no difference at all whether the immigrants enter legally or not, except that the “illegals” are even less likely to have any useful qualifications or skills. The result, over generations, will be the same.
This is exactly what those who favour a “written constitution” for the UK, or who come from the USA, often fail to understand. Britain does have a Constitution, and actually it is not entirely “unwritten”; it is contained in innumerable precedents, laws, customs, conventional procedures etc, but is not contained in one quasi-sacred document, as is the Constitution of the USA.
The best way to understand the British Constitution is to read a student text. English law undergraduate students, for example, usually have to take a Constitutional Law module in the first year of their degree.
Britain’s priorities— the views of Lord Moynihan
“Declining countries like ours...” Janan Ganesh? Hm…
“The regulations most destructive of growth are those created by moral panics — net zero, diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives (DEI), environmental social governance (ESG), “hate speech” and on. This government has created a new regulator every week. Each chips away at the ability of businesses to focus on selling their products and managing their employees. DEI and ESG are destroying the London Stock Exchange. The ludicrous proposal for a new football regulator will muck up one of our most successful sectors. Net zero is wrecking our automotive industry, our steel industry, our petrochemical industry, oil and gas businesses, farming, housebuilding … you name it. As Reeves is beginning to understand, net zero must be entirely put aside if we want to have growth.
No one is explaining the obvious: there is no money. In 1950, the UK had the fifth-highest GDP per capita in the world. Now we’re 27th and dropping. Yet we still act as though we have money to burn, spending more per capita on benefits than our wealth allows. We spend what “feels right” or seems “fair” rather than what we can afford. More prudent, formerly much poorer countries such as Poland are forecast to overtake us. Our brightest and best are leaving the country.”
[Lord Moynihan in the Times]
In a sense, correct. My remedy, though, is of course not the same as that proposed in the Times (free-market pseudo-libertarianism), but a form of social nationalism.
Slightly to my surprise, I realised, after a week or two of Starmer-Labour, that the new Cabinet was clueless to an extent that rivalled or indeed outdid those of Cameron-Levita, Theresa May, “Boris”-idiot, Liz Truss, and the little Indian money-juggler, Sunak.
“Rachel from Accounts and Customer Relations” is not even the worst of the bunch. I mean, just look at David Lammy!
That Times article has sensible elements, but then degenerates into a polemic against the Welfare State and even (up to a point) the State itself. The Ayn Rand poison (((poison))) has contaminated socio-political thought in both the USA and UK.
I looked up the author of that Times piece, one Lord Moynihan; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Moynihan,_Baron_Moynihan_of_Chelsea. Supported (and generously donated to), both Liz Truss (who nominated him for the peerage) and “Boris” Johnson. Oh dear…
He may know about business and, perhaps, economics, but his socio-political understanding seems to leave much to be desired.
The polemic continues thus:
“Our focus should be on citizens’ responsibilities — to get a job, support themselves and their family and contribute to the tax base (53 per cent of citizens currently get more in benefits than they pay in taxes).
But who is going to say this? All the major political parties regard it as electoral suicide to oppose the pension triple lock, cut disability payments, scrap regulators. Just look at the hysterical reaction to Labour’s eminently sensible cuts in the winter fuel allowance. Political leaders got the message: we must pretend that current levels of government spending are entirely affordable. But until some politician can persuade the electorate of the hard realities of what’s needed to get us growing again, things can only get worse.”
So the “noble” “lord” supports taking away the winter fuel help for pensioners, supports reducing the State pension itself, and supports (further) impoverishing the sick and disabled etc? Terrible, and actually unnecessary.
I agree, though, that there must come a point at which the British people say “ENOUGH!”…but not to institute a society of “Ronnie Reagan meets Ayn Rand”. More like “English tradition meets National Socialism and social nationalism, and they meet the Threefold Social Order”…
Lammy again. I would call him traitor, but one cannot be a traitor to Britain when one is not British. Just an enemy, then…
Can 17% of the UK population really be that ill-informed?
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
‘Dictatorial power’: How Elon Musk is taking over the MAGA movement | Rick Perlstein
Anti white Joooooo !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TO7h_Yxm3VA
LikeLike
Hello: Today I visited the website of the National Army Museum (London); luckily I did not eat anything earlier otherwise I would have throw up. I shall let the picture speak for me…
https://www.nam.ac.uk/
LikeLike
Claudius:
Every ad, every drama, every soap opera, every every…
The silly thing is, very few blacks are even interested in our museums.
LikeLike
That is quite logical, after all, European culture and history are alien to them. Why should they be interested? What infuriates me are the cowards in charge of these institutions who give in all the time.
LikeLike
Talking about “Actions speak louder than words”, look at Donald “The Butler” Trump moving the chair for Netantahu and then standing behind him, like a good butler/waiter, waiting for further orders. The actual video clip can be seen at 2.30. I enjoyed Emil´s introduction.
LikeLike
A little bit of magnificent art in equally magnificent surroundings. This is a short presentation of the superb collection of the Borghese family on display at the famous “Galleria Borghese” in Rome. It was the villa of the Cardinal Scipione Borghese, a fanatical art collector who whould do ANYTHING to obtain what he wanted. The video has English subtitles and the presentation is excellent.
LikeLike
“More like “English tradition meets National Socialism and social nationalism, and they meet the Threefold Social Order”…”
I wonder what an organic, uniquely British/English form of fascism or social nationalism would look like.
The German version of fascism drew from Norse/Germanic history, heritage, and culture, including Norse mythology and the Vikings.
The Italian version of fascism drew from Ancient Rome.
Japanese fascism drew from the samurai culture and heritage.
Spain’s version of fascism (Falangism) was heavily influenced by Catholicism, as well as the “golden age of Spain” in the 1400s-1600s.
Each country’s version of fascism is unique to that country, because fascism is a nationalistic ideology, unlike communism which is international.
It’s interesting to think about what a uniquely British or English form of fascism would consist of.
Of course there were the British Fascists, but they were basically Italian fascism grafted onto English politics. They even called themselves the “British Fascisti” originally. Arnold Leese derided them as “the Conservative Party with knobs on”, in other words a slightly more muscular version of the Tories. Their badge is rather elegant looking:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Fascists
And then there was Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists (BUF), which he formed after quitting the Labor Party. While more organically British in terms of ideology that the British Fascists mentioned above, the BUF modeled itself heavily on the Italian and German versions of fascism, wearing (black) uniforms. Mosley was a powerful and charismatic speaker, and could have been a strong national leader for Britain, had he come to power. The BUF used the iconic lightning bolt within a circle as their symbol:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Union_of_Fascists
There were also a few organizations that closely imitated German-style fascism, holding the view that German National Socialism would be the best system for Britain. These groups included Captain Arnold Leese’s Imperial Fascist League, as well as the National Socialist League:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Fascist_League
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_League
Additionally, there were groups that, while not fascist per se, advocated ideology and policies that were sympathetic to or adjacent to fascism. Some of these groups, such as Captain Archibald Maule-Ramsay’s Right Club sought to remove (((REDACTED))) influence, while other groups such as The Link and The Anglo-German Fellowship sought closer relations with Germany.
https://spartacus-educational.com/2WWrightclub.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Link_(UK_organization)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-German_Fellowship
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militant_Christian_Patriots
An interesting social-national (though not fascist) party was the British People’s Party, financed by the 12th Duke of Bedford until his rather suspicious death in 1953. The BPP was the only social-national movement that survived World War 2, with all of the others either being banned or disbanding or withering away during the war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_People%27s_Party_(1939)
There were also a few small fascist or quasi-fascist movements in Scotland, but these were little more than anti-Catholic pressure groups, with no significant ideology beyond anti-Catholicism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Democratic_Fascist_Party
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Protestant_League
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestant_Action_Society
Sagacious visionary nationalist statesmen such as Adolf Hitler and Oswald Mosley correctly viewed the Catholic vs Protestant dispute as a pointless distraction which divided the White race.
In terms of economics, there was also the Social Credit movement, founded by the Englishman Major CH Douglas:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_Party_of_Great_Britain_and_Northern_Ireland
Distributism is another economic system that is closely related to social nationalism. GK Chesteron was a supporter of distributes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism#:~:text=13%20External%20links-,Overview,%2C%20or%20corporations%20(corporatocracy).
Another related economic system is (fascist) corporatism, supported by Sir Oswald Mosley:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism#Fascist_corporatism
Perhaps the most uniquely organic English version of fascism was promulgated by the somewhat mystical group English Mistery, which also had an offshoot called English Array:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Mistery
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Array
A couple of related groups were Kinship In Husbandry and the Rural Reconstruction Association:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolf_Gardiner#Kinship_in_Husbandry
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Reconstruction_Association
The emergence of a uniquely, organically British version of fascism or social nationalism was cut off by the start of the war, whereupon the government banned several groups and the others were forced to go underground.
But it is interesting to think about what could have been, and what may still be yet.
Of course, the important thing to focus on now is awakening the White British people and restoring their Pro-White survival instincts, their racial pride and love of their race, and their sense of racial identity, and unifying the White British people in a Pro-White movement that will win power.
All other ideological considerations are secondary.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Friend of Britain:
Thank you. Very interesting. I was unaware of some of that information.
Of course, it is easy to criticise or even deride some of those people and organizations, but it seems to me that whatever they had that was worthy of survival or is worthy of revival is of more importance than the other material, or typical belief, that was merely a distorted reflection of those now-long-ago times.
LikeLike
Thank you very much for the information provided. I did not know several of those groups which, sadly, were too small or nip in the bud. The famous architectural photographer Eric de Maré (1910-2002) was a supporter of the Social Credit movement and even wrote a book called “A Matter of Life or Debt”. Here is the link for anyone interested in downloading it:
https://pdfcoffee.com/qdownload/a-matter-of-life-or-debt-by-eric-de-mare-brilliant-book-on-social-credit-pdf-free.html
LikeLike