Diary Blog, 18 June 2026

Morning music

[Roman Bozhkov, Morning Music]

Tweets seen

The patience of the Russian leadership with this increasingly-serious shadow-boxing with the Kiev regime must be wearing thin.

(ps. the “Ian” there is not me but another Ian).

I may not “support” “Tommy Robinson”, as such (because he is controlled or too-influenced by the Israel-lobby), but he has a point here, of course.

I hope so, and that that is not a smoke-and-mirrors job designed to keep massive non-European hordes in Europe.

In the present age, trains should be run by the State as a strategic part of the economy, and fares kept reasonably low. At present, in the UK, we are getting the worst of both worlds: high prices combined with poor services (often) and the taxpayers funding private profits.

Those ticket prices London-Wigan are just insane.

Labour ministers and “comms” drones imagine that winning the Makerfield by-election (assuming that they do) will effectively crush both Reform UK and Restore Britain. I doubt it, but even were that so, it will not crush the justified and growing anger of the British people (including, in coming years, those in Makerfield) at migration invasion, environmental collapse, falls in living standards (and all other standards) etc.

Incidentally, “GOTV” = “Get Out The Vote”. Labour is throwing everything at this by-election. Desperate.

As said…desperate…

A few drone strikes, however destructive, on Moscow or other cities, will not change the arithmetic in the overall battlefield space.

I see Russian tweets etc claiming capture of villages, small settlements etc; from the Ukrainian side, not even that. The claimed Ukrainian advances must be either over depopulated areas of farmland and woodland or, at least as likely, non-existent.

The elephant in the room, surely, is the fact that Putin and the Russian leadership are not using more than a few percent, maybe less than one percent, of their potential destructive power. Russia has 7,000 nuclear weapons.

Would seem to indicate, if typical, that Russia is losing only 1 soldier killed for every 15 Ukrainian soldiers.

[“Labour has no right to win Makerfield, by @bnhwalker.

If Labour wins in Makerfield it will have been down to one man: Andy Burnham. In the most recent local elections every one of the individual council wards in Makerfield went Reform’s way. Nigel Farage’s party secured 50 per cent of the vote compared to Labour’s 25 per cent. Labour has never done so badly in Wigan. Whatever the capacities of one candidate, Reform should be winning it. The Makerfield constituency polls put Andy Burnham ahead by between 5-12 points.”]

There are 650 constituencies in the UK and Northern Ireland. I do not believe that any Burnham Bounce will swing (even in 2026) more than 50 of them. In any case, once (if it happens) Burnham is “crowned” PM, he will be faced with the same issues as Starmer-stein. Will he have better answers, or outcomes? I very much doubt that.

By 2029, this country will be even angrier and/or more desperate.

[“People vote in extraordinary ways in by-elections. They’ll even vote tactically for a party they can’t stand if it achieves the goal of a bloody nose to the party they backed last time. Honestly the way Labour has flooded Makerfield and the shocking machinations of Simons & Burnham would have me moving from abstention to considering in the privacy of the ballot booth a way of holding my nose to deliver a bloody nose. And as an ex-Tory I’m prepared to give LDs or Labour a hearing, I’m much closer to them on a few things than any of the (very) right-wing parties, that speaks to my natural and growing Burnham antipathy. The Our Andy stuff has been insufferable even from a distance.”]

UK Government aggression towards Russia is veering into the territory of outright war. Supplying the Kiev regime with 150,000 drones (presumably funded by the British taxpayer, at that) is tantamount to the UK taking a very active and direct part in the war. Mad.

As said before, Britain has never had any substantial connection with Ukraine, not in the thousand years of Ukraine’s history as effectively part of Russia, and not in its mere 35 years as a corrupt and shambolic notionally independent state. None.

Now the anti-British “British” government is launching what amounts to a military campaign against Russia in order to support the corrupt and brutal Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev. People should be asking why…

Were I a resident of Kiev, I should be packing my bags. Frankly, if this continues, the same might be said of London.

Exactly.

Exactly.

As said, the absurd thing is that, if Labour wins the by-election, nothing in fact changes and, outside the Manchester area, I doubt that Burnham is much of a gamechanger electorally.

I just read the brief Iran-US agreement. It is 90% in Iran’s favour, if not 100%. After 60 days, fees chargeable by Iran to all other states’ shipping to ship through the Strait of Hormuz; Iran oil exports to start again; Iranian assets to be unfrozen worldwide; a USD $300 BILLION fund (payable presumably by the USA) for the reconstruction of Iran (after the American and Israeli bombing and missile attacks); an Iranian pledge not to develop nuclear weapons (a promise already in place before the war anyway).

The USA has learned a lesson. Do not let the Jews (whether in Israel or the USA itself) dictate your foreign policy. Do not let the tail wag the dog.

A strategic disaster for both the USA and Israel, and the fault for it lies with Netanyahu and Israel, and with Trump. A TV personality and speculative businessman does not a statesman nor a strategist make, in most cases.

F.O.! Hegseth, you idiot— and take your Jews and (now-demented) Trump with you.

Something that, as I have noticed this week, people across the political spectrum agree upon. A horrible crime even in a country of (now) often horrible crimes.

That case also makes it clear that children of any age should never be condemned to be adopted by gay men in performative “marriage” “cosplays” (same goes for crazed lesbian couples).

Our animal friends. It is good to see something natural and pure after so much human degeneracy.

All roads lead to Rome, but…yes.

…or Russian, for that matter.

(in fact, there was never a serious possibility of German forces invading the UK in or around 1940, and there is no possibility of Russia taking over the UK in 2026).

Apparently an AI fake.

[Update, later same day: some msm outlets are now saying it is genuine. If so, mad…].

Incidentally, that “Crewkerne Man” is none other than Joshua Bonehill, or Bonehill-Paine, who used to put himself forward, about a decade or so ago, as a coming sort-of “national socialist”-style “Fuhrer” of the UK.

Bonehill-Paine tried to organize anti-Jew marches and would-be semi-pogroms in Golders Green and Central London (I think that 6 or 7 idiots actually turned up).

Bonehill-Paine was then, after a number of both political and non-political criminal convictions, imprisoned for many months, over a year in fact. In prison, he turned, or was turned, or brainwashed (?), from “antisemitism” to Judaeo-philia.

“Bonehill-Paine first questioned his antisemitic views during his second year in prison, after reading the Bible, and enrolled on a deradicalisation course via his probation officer.[4]” [Wikipedia]

Q.E.D.

Now, recently filmed looking 30+ years older than he did only a decade ago, he is apparently a supporter of the washed-up “Conservative” Party, is ludicrously pro-Jew and pro-Israel, and is even promoted by Israeli media outlets (as seen on his Twitter/X banner).

Very very strange.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Bonehill-Paine

Crewkerne Man meets Manchurian Candidate?

Late tweets seen

Unbelievable.

Mirabile dictu! I actually agree with Ed Davey on something…

Incredible that a supposed “top businesswoman” (Deborah Meaden) can be so dim; there again, it is a common fallacy that the very wealthy (even those who inherited riches) must somehow be highly intelligent, and very knowledgeable. Often, not so.

As for multikulti “Conservative” drone Fraser Nelson, I have written about him on the blog in the past. Nothing he writes is worth reading.

The very terminology is outdated. “Working class” is almost as passé as what Ernest Bevin once called “the jolly old proletariat“.

As noted on the blog for several years, drones have changed the face of warfare, especially infantry warfare. This is only the start.

In the end, Burnham will be same-old, even if he runs Starmer out of town.

At the 2024 General Election, and in very rough figures, for every 20 eligible voters 8 did not vote at all; 4 out of the 20 voted Labour, 3 voted Conservative, 2 voted Reform, 2 voted LibDem, and 1 voted Green.

Starmer-Labour, as I blogged 2 years ago, only had the active electoral support of a third of those that actually voted in 2024, and a mere fifth of all of those eligible to vote.

Now? About half of the 2024 figures.

Opinion polling suggests that Labour, even under Burnham, would be the choice of only around 26% of voters were there a GE any time soon.

By 2029, Burnham-Labour, if Burnham does take over, will probably be running in the polls at around 20% at best. Will Labour try to change the rules, as they are presently doing in Manchester re. the mayoral by-election?

There is no “Parliamentary road” for us, but elections may yet be a peripheral part of the way forward.

Our animal friends.

Yes, foxes kill chickens, such is their nature, so just ensure your chickens etc are protected, that’s all. Good fences make good neighbours.

Late music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Makarova]
[Pushkin Boulevard, Donetsk]

25 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 18 June 2026”

  1. Lula da Silva, did that include the Grade A moron/absolute maniac in charge of the UK,’Sir’ Kwer Stalin? He seems to be absolutely determined to push us into a nuclear conflict with the world’s PRIMARY nuclear power who might drop a few of these little babies on London (mind you, at least the crime rate of London Zoo would drop)?: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_bomba

    Like

  2. It is a bit rich of Matt Goodwin to rightfully complain about the pathetic, simply inexcusable, overly expensive rubbish train ‘services’ run by private operators when he is a leading spokesman for Reform UK which is still basically libertarian globalist Thatcherite as UKIP was in its approach to the economy though, I think, Reform has slightly tilted away from very liberal economic views.

    That privatising British Rail was wrong can be shown by the fact even the ‘Iron Lady’ herself, Margaret Thatcher, did not do it as well as rightfully staying away from putting the Royal Mail into private hands.

    Most of her privatisations were sensible eg British Airways but a few were ill-advised eg water and electricity.

    Some services are natural monopolies thus they should be owned by the state. One of the very few countries that have successful private railways is Japan but that is because a very large number of Japs live on a vast coastal plain that includes the major cities of Tokyo, Osaka and Kyoto.

    Like

    1. John:
      Yes. I prefer the economy as a whole to be a well-regulated private enterprise one, but a few major sectors must be under national (political) control: most rail, most water, most large-scale electricity, gas etc, and so on.

      Like

      1. The ideal type of economy is regulated private enterprise. The vast majority of it should be in private hands with a few exceptions as you describe.

        Complete ‘laissez faire’ does not work. I admire the kind of ‘developmental’ economies such as Japan’s, Taiwan’s and South Korea’s where the state had close co-operation with private business. Japan’s Ministry of International Trade and Industry(MITI) had a key role in the Japanese state gently guiding business investment and trade policies which enabled that country to rise from being a bomb shattered wreck in 1945 to being an economic superpower by the 1960’s and 1970’s.

        Like

  3. As a proud Brit and British patriot, I have had my fill of Yankee insults against us. If it were not for half-Yank moron, Churchil, they would still be playing second fiddle to us. We not helping them in their and Israel’s stupid war against Iran is still not as bad as them threatening us with consequences directed at our national currency when we, France and Israel got together at Suez in 1956.

    NATO is, indeed, a one way street in AMERICA’s favour. Without it, the USA would not be able to dominate Britain and Europe so much and America’s imperium over Europe would end. NATO bolster’s America’s power

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Regarding the “half-Yankee moron” (Churchill). I remember visiting Blenheim Palace in 2000 and seeing a large, framed, fancy certificate granting honorary US citizenship to W. Churchill. They should have written: “For extraordinary services rendered to World Jewry and the USA, including the destruction of the British Empire and the German Reich.”

      Like

  4. Yes, Fiona, we in Europe can criticise America for its overly individualistic and excessive ‘dog eats dog’ society. That too many Americans have no healthcare coverage and are basically left to die on the streets if they do not have a job is uncivilised.

    I am not saying the way we provide universal healthcare is ideal as there are good alternative models eg Taiwan and South Korea but at least everyone in Britain is able to access healthcare whatever the size of their bank account.

    Like

  5. Yes, Samantha Thompson, we could learn a heck of a lot from Japan. I have not visited it but it is at the top of my wishlist of countries to go to. Just standing for a few minutes in Tokyo would be good. It must be brilliant to visit a country not overloaded with PC globalist lunatics. Leftie weirdos pollute the very air in this land along with the ‘police’ ect.

    Like

  6. The Makerfield By-Election is a very strange one so it is hard to discern wider political trends from it. It seems as if Andy Burnham is the prime factor at work. Without him standing, Labour would deservedly lose. He is standing as an OFFICIAL Labour Party candidate so he should own all this government’s failures. He obviously has a personal vote but surely can not be THAT popular, can he? Apparently, he has done some good by improving public transport in Greater Manchester with the buses and trams ect but is also reputed to have played a part covering-up the activities of mainly muslim gang rape gangs.

    Like

    1. John:
      Many msm drones etc are very keen to see Burnham win and so, temporarily, suppress the newer and dissident voices such as Reform and Restore. There has been a big propaganda campaign supporting Burnham.

      Note how invisible the Conservative Party has been re. this by-election, where their candidate may end up with about 1% of the votes cast.

      Like

      1. Yes, but the Conservative Party has long been irrelevant in constituencies like that and is even more so now under little Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch the Nigerian anchor baby!🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

        At least under Labour, Reform UK or even the Liberal Democrats for God’s Sake you will be voting for a party with a British leader at its head!🙄🙄🙄

        THAT is the SHEER STATE of what the Conservative Party represents in the year 2026.🙄🙄🙄

        If only Enoch had a son, eh?

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enoch_Powell

        Like

  7. Talmud Tommy Ten Names Rubinstein is a civic fake ‘nationalist’ lefty who has a bee in his bonnet about Islam and muslim immigration but who does not have a problem with Indian Pajeet immigration or that from Africa!🙄🙄🙄🙄

    In short, apart from disliking Islam and muslim immigration, he may as well be an idiot Labour Party supporter!🙄🙄🙄😡😡🤬🤬

    He is a fanatical supporter of Zionism and the Zionist state and receives funding from Zionists. In other words like most people who support Israel he is a fake ‘patriot’.

    Apart from that, he is right in that tweet about the Oxford Union and thick, moronic students who should simply not be studying there or at any other university when they have a far left intolerance for freedom of speech and freedom of thought.

    Like

    1. The one thing Farage does get right is keeping a distance between his party and Torah Tommy Ten Names Columbian Marching Powder Rubinstein. Associating a political party that wants to get elected with him is political death.

      Like

  8. Frazer Nelson is an utterly repellent, anti-British globalist moron so it is now wonder the globalist, so-called ‘Right-wing’ Spectator lets him write for it. I would say Frazer is a one man walking advert for Scottish ‘independence’. Can we dump him on Rockall, Fair Isle or even on the Ille du Coin in the Chagos Islands along with those Chagossians staying there?

    Like

  9. If you believe in that, Matt Goodwin, then WHY are you in Reform UK? They are a classic populist party who have no real coherent political philosophy. They are a media-puffed protest party. A ‘Controlled Oppositiion’ safety-valve. Why else does the globalist, anti-British media give them such a soft ride compared to Restore Britain?

    Like

  10. Bloody hell, Ed Davey, mind how you go! You are not supposed to say something trueful and sensible like that!

    If the Lib Dems adopted a ‘Mind Britain’s Business’ (a defence/foreign policy posture of Sir Oswald Mosley) isolationalist stance as you could say a true liberal party would have it might revive their fortunes.

    Apparently, the Liberal Party government in 1914 was not all that enthusiastic about the war at its start.

    Like

  11. I am, like many, puzzled by what Putin and his admin are not doing while Russians are mostly patriots who would ide for the country.

    Here is what Putin could have done, could do and should do:

    1/ Eliminate Zelensky and his close associates
    2/ Target and sabotage western refineries like they sabotage Russian ones
    3/ Target western tankers like they target Russian ones
    4/ Strike all ways of communications between Ukraine and its western handlers (roads, rails, airports, ports).
    5/ Destroy bridges on the Dnieper according to needs
    6/ Keep striking Ukrainian military and energy facilities until complete surrender
    7/ Stop talking to Trump until the US stops funding Ukraine, get rid of Kiril Dmitriev and replace him with a real negotiator.

    Confirmed by Russian experts and experts of Russia’s political life:

    “I was wrong!”: Why Russia can’t avoid eliminating Zelensky
    https://en.topcor.ru/72117-ja-oshibalsja-pochemu-rf-ne-obojtis-bez-unichtozhenija-zelenskogo.html

    https://johnhelmer.net/new-dealer-for-iran-for-ukraine-vice-president-jd-vance-unveils-the-vanchorage-formula-for-president-vladimir-putin/

    Perhaps Putin is Being Kept Deliberately in the Dark?
    https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com

    A Heartwarming Call Between Two Dear Old Friends
    https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com

    THE IRAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING IS A STICKUP TRUMP WILL TRY TO REPEAT WITH RUSSIA
    https://johnhelmer.net/the-iran-memorandum-of-understanding-is-a-stickup-trump-will-try-to-repeat-with-russia/

    Elections are coming in Russia too and maybe a real nationalist is needed to finish this war.

    On the home front, Paul Craig Robert rightly writes:

    Why Aren’t Keir Starmer, British Social Workers and British Police Hanging from Lamp Posts?
    https://paulcraigroberts.org/why-arent-keir-starmer-british-social-workers-and-british-police-hanging-from-lamp-posts/

    The Starmer anti-white, zionist, pro-Muslim and pedo-regime was exposed by RT for what it is:

    Britain’s rape gangs: Here’s what’s in the report the mainstream AND ALT media ARE ignoring
    https://www.rt.com/news/641730-uk-rape-gangs-report-lowe/

    It is true that all media ignore the scandal, and many so-called alt-media…

    Like

    1. Ronnie:
      Putin is trying to avoid outright war with NATO. In chess terms, he is playing a fairly subtle positional game, one based on gradual strategy to outflank NATO and the EU. Thus the considerable efforts made to keep China and Turkey (etc) onside.

      I think that Zelensky must spend most of his time, especially at night, outside Kiev, as Churchill spent much of the war in a variety of safe locations outside London (such as Ditchley Park in Oxfordshire…and a very nice place it is; I have seen it).

      I notice that Western VIP visitors are often taken around central Kiev, near the Foreign Ministry, but there are few ordinary citizens walking around. The visitors meet with Zelensky in the street, sometimes. Photo-opportunities inside a gilded and guarded cage.

      I have myself been puzzled by the fact that the rail system in Eastern Ukraine has not much been targeted. As for bridges, maybe the idea is that the Russian forces might have use for them later, though admittedly that would be unlikely if the aim is to take only Ukraine east of the Dnieper.

      Ultimately, I think that Putin wants to slowly pressure the Kiev regime until Western aid slackens and stops. He has had some success with that, but now it looks as if the UK under Starmer-stein intends to escalate matters.

      Like

    2. Look at that story on the side of that Russia Today post: https://www.rt.com/news/641754/israeli-police-clash-orthodox-jews..

      Disgraceful! I wonder why the supposedly pro-Jewish British media do not report on REAL ‘anti-semitism’ like the fact that Ultra-Orthadox Haredi Jews in the Zionist state regularly get beaten-up by the Zionist state’s police because being decent and humane kind of people they do not want to serve in the murderous, so-called Israeli Defence Forces (IDF)?

      It seems as if the British media keep-on conflating ‘anti-semitism’ with ‘anti-Zionism’ thus actually helping to INCREASE REAL ‘anti-semitism’. Funny that!🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

      Like

  12. I have just read the definition of a MOU, and, according to it:

    It’s a formal but non-binding agreement between two or more parties.

    It outlines the intentions, roles, and responsibilities of each party in a potential collaboration or partnership.

    While not legally enforceable like a contract, it shows that the parties are serious about working together and agree on the broad terms.

    The last part is extremely important: if it is NOT legally enforceable, what’s the point?

    Like

    1. Claudius:
      Agreements between states are rarely legally-enforceable in the way that private contracts are, unless the parties have agreed also, in advance, to subject any dispute to some third party or multilateral adjudication.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thank you for the information. I am very sad about the death of that beautiful fox named “Charlie”. Each of these adorable friends who dies leaves an open wound.

        BTW, I was reading about that psycho named Joshua Bonehill-Paine. What a nutter! I have heard of similar cases where these maniacs said, “They found Jesus”, and deeply regret their antisemitism. I have noticed that there is a strong connection between political and religious nutters.

        Like

      2. Claudius:
        I do not know the whole story, but I think that the man had the fox from a young age. Of course, the death of a companion animal scars you.

        Like

Leave a comment