Tag Archives: Makerfield by-election

Diary Blog, 7 July 2026

Morning music

Tweets seen

Translates to a Commons with about 260 Reform UK MPs (about 66 short of a bare majority), Lab 106 (very weak official Opposition), Cons 104, 51 LibDems, 46 Greens, 45 SNP, 12 Plaid [etc].

So much for the “Burnham Bounce” the msm scribblers expected.

I blogged, after the Makerfield by-election, that Burnham’s supposed popularity, an entirely contrived idea anyway, would not travel far outside Manchester. I think that it is becoming obvious that that is so.

Farage is under attack for his various sleazy connections, but people are voting, or intending to vote, Reform not because they much agree with or much like Farage or Reform, but precisely to hit out at Lab and Con, to do them down. An anti-System tendency.

I saw Annie Machon once, with her then boyfriend David Shayler. They jumped onto the platform of a bus I was already on, in Baker Street, at the traffic lights at Marylebone Road. I believe that such buses with open platforms no longer exist; what a pity— brilliant and useful design.

I have no idea whether that was their way of throwing off surveillance, or whether they just wanted to catch the bus. I recognized them immediately.

At that time, Shayler and, by association, Annie Machon, were fairly if briefly famous, and were in the newspapers fairly often. Must have been around 2002. I think that they were on their way to what had once, in the mid-1990s, been my old stamping-ground, the Royal Courts of Justice in the Strand.

Small world. I later spoke, in 2017, at the London Forum, where Shayler also gave a talk about half an hour before me, though I did not actually meet him or exchange any words with him. By that time, he had already been —and then not been— both a sort-of transsexual “cosplay” and, by his own account, the Son of God.

Actually, I quite enjoyed Shayler’s talk at the London Forum.

As for Annie Machon, I believe she lived in Iceland for a while, though her Wikipedia entry does not mention that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annie_Machon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Shayler

[“The Government has confirmed that its so called ‘independent’ Digital ID Advisory watchdog, will not have its minutes published.

We are expected to carry out parliamentary scrutiny on one of the most significant erosions of our civil liberties for decades, and yet we are not told the group budget, member selection process, or given the minutes from their meetings. Journalists have also been excluded from advisory panels.

The Government must give us answers on this sinister policy, and rethink its current course.“]

We do not really live in a democracy but in a thinly-disguised oligarchic tyranny.

That bastard Ellwood is one of the worst criminals in this country. If the UK becomes a radioactive wasteland by reason of a pointless and unnecessary war with Russia, a major part of the guilt and blame will be his.

What is often forgotten is that the sale of fighter jets is not merely a matter of the aircraft themselves but also of the technical add-ons and training that usually form part of the sales package.

“Journalists” (scribblers, talking-heads etc) in the UK are mostly scavengers and similar riff-raff.

Farage must be odds-on to win the by-election. He got a vote-share of 46.2% in 2024.

At GE 2024, the Con Party put up their (former) MP candidate, retired actor and Garrick Club member, Giles Watling, at Clacton; he came second with 27.9% of the vote. Labour put up some young African, which was a deliberate insult to the English people of Clacton; the African got 16.2% of the vote.

Since 2024, Labour’s popularity has sunk, and I doubt whether the expected replacement of Starmer by Burnham will change much; it might even compound Labour’s problems.

As for the Conservatives, they have, it seems, now decided not to stand a candidate at the by-election. They may be afraid that their 2024 27.9% would sink to somewhere around 20% or even 15%. Whatever the truth of that, their absence must mean that Farage is a shoo-in. He may end up with over half, or even three-quarters, of the vote.

I cannot recall a (former) “main party” in the UK ever failing to put up a candidate at a Parliamentary by-election.

I have just now read that Labour will also not be standing a candidate at that by-election, and presumably for the same reasons— fear of getting a very humiliatingly-low vote; maybe about 10% of the overall vote. Farage is thereby guaranteed to get something like 75% of the vote.

[“Tories will never have an easier by-election again. Everyone else has stood aside. And they still don’t think they can win. No courage, no fight, no desire to change a frankly disastrous narrative. If they’re down to 40 seats it’s entirely their fault. Every single message or policy they put out is appalling. The strategy suicidal. Under anyone else they’d walk Clacton.“]

Not sure that I agree with the lady’s conclusion, but the failure to stand a candidate does scream out “we are afraid of getting a tiny vote“; same goes for Labour.

Late tweets

Our animal friends.

NATO and the EU are pushing hard. One day, Russia may decide to push back equally as hard, or harder.

[“Ishchenko: To avoid war with Europe, Russia must eliminate Ukraine as a Western war platform.

ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE CONFLICT ARE NOW MANEUVERING BEFORE WAR – THE BRITISH ARE LEADING THE CHARGE TOWARDS WAR.

Currently, Britain is actively pushing towards a major European war. They have already made their decision. And, judging by the reactions of their nominal allies, Germany, Finland, and the Baltic states share this view. Poland is afraid, but also shares this sentiment.

A new phase of escalation may only begin after the war in Ukraine. And, judging by the determination of the British, who are organizing provocations at every turn, they will ultimately lead things to war.

A significant portion of Western Europe is, in one way or another, prepared to support the British plan for a major European war with Russia.”]

I think that the Kiev regime may only disappear when Kiev itself disappears; and that may happen.

There is something of the absurd about a tiny and unwarlike country such as the Netherlands fomenting war so assiduously.

Late music

[Russian special forces operatives deploy over a snowy Russia]

Diary Blog, 4 July 2026

Morning music

[grave of Hugo Alfven, Leksand, Sweden; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Alfv%C3%A9n]

Saturday quiz

A second unusual week, in which political journalist John Rentoul scored higher than me. He made 6/10, but I could manage only a fairly miserable 4/10 (questions 6, 7, 8, and —a complete guess— 10). I had in fact heard of the answers to questions 2, 3, 5, and 9, but could not bring them to mind, so a very poor 4/10 it is this week.

Well, there it is. Some Indian “Bombay Failed” is still at the Bar despite proven dishonesty, and (looking at the background of that photo, New Hall and the Library of Lincoln’s Inn, London) still welcome at what was my own Inn of Court, whereas I myself was wrongfully —and actually unlawfully— disbarred in 2016, which therefore also triggered automatic expulsion from Lincoln’s Inn. See:

To give the Bar Standards Board their due, they did write to me a couple of years later, admitting that I should never have been disbarred (because my “case” should have been heard by a 3-person Tribunal panel, and not a 5-person one; 3-person panels have no power to disbar). I declined for several reasons, among which the facts that I would be unlikely to return to active Bar practice and that the Bar is now a dustbin anyway.

What were my supposed defaults anyway? To have tweeted on Twitter five —yes, only 5, out of 150,000— supposedly “offensive” tweets (and retweets).

All five “offensive” (not at all offensive) tweets were completely true. For example, that that snivelling little bastard, Michael Gove, was a puppet of Israel and the Jewish lobby, as well as having been an expenses fraudster when serving as an MP.

All true.

At that time, it was unknown (at least to me) that the little bastard (Gove) was also a drunk and a drug abuser.

So, as seen, the said “Bombay Failed” is now reinstated as a barrister (indeed, still holds the —now-very-degraded— status of “KC”), while Gove has been, ludicrously, elevated to the House of Lords (despite the drugs, drink, fraudulent dishonesty, and other deviant behaviour).

I, on the other hand, am now effectively an “unperson”…

Does that not say rather a lot about our whole society?

As regular readers of the blog will know, my matter only came to the attention of the Bar Standards Board (2014) and so to a Bar Disciplinary Tribunal (2016) because of a long and conspiratorial campaign by connected packs of Jews— UK Lawyers for Israel, and the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism”, the memberships or support cadres of which overlap to a certain extent.

The latter pack also managed to have me tried in the magistrates’ court in 2023 for entirely true and correct blog posts. See:

The blog continued to be published, and on a near-daily basis, right the way through the process of trial and sentencing in 2023 and 2024. It will continue to be published, no matter what, even if it has to be switched to another jurisdiction.

It will quite soon be 10 years since I was so wrongfully and unlawfully disbarred (in October 2016), nearly 3 years (November 2023) since I was wrongfully put on trial for exercising my free speech rights, and well over 2 years (March 2024) since I was sentenced for having exercised my right —and duty— to publish the truth. Time flows on, and truth continues to be the truth.

More tweets seen

Translates to a Commons with about 276 Reform UK MPs (50 short of bare majority), Lab 105, 77 Cons, 60 Greens, 51 LibDems, 45 SNP, 12 Plaid [etc].

Once again, as in all polls since the Makerfield by-election, Reform UK falling short of a Commons majority and therefore reliant on the votes of at least two-thirds of Con MPs to get anything through.

We hear so much about “the high street” and how the shops there have to be helped etc. I am not so sure we even need to “save the high street”. After all, you go there, and half the time you cannot find a park spot, and when you do you are expected to pay for it, even if you are only going to be there for half an hour.

Most of the really useful high street stores and facilities have been closed or are about to be closed (banks, post offices, Woolworths, W.H. Smith etc).

Maybe it is time to accept that, just as the towns of Roman Britain fell into disuse, many of them being abandoned, once the Romans left Britain and Roman society stopped working in Britain, the 18thC/19thC/20thC “high street” has now outlived its usefulness in the UK.

Fertilizing of fields

I was idly wondering whether human bodies, in large numbers, are a beneficial source of fertilizer for soil, or more of a contaminant. As people say on Twitter/X, “genuine question”. I do not know.

I know that Rudolf Steiner made the point that certain types of tree, in the northern temperate zone, have always been planted in or around churchyards with the idea of decontaminating the area. Yew trees are the best-known of such trees.

I do not know, cannot recall, though, what Steiner said specifically about all that.

Of course, there are areas of the world, particularly areas where large-scale battles took place, and where most of the fallen were buried where they fell: the Somme in Northern France; the area around Volgograd (former Stalingrad) in southern Russia etc. The farmers around Volgograd still find skulls which come to the surface in the Spring.

I myself have travelled through the area of the Somme several times, and there is a strange feeling at times there, a heaviness in the spiritual atmosphere; sombre. However, my interest at present is more in the practical biochemical aspects.

Perhaps I shall consult with the excellent Google AI system.

More tweets seen

[“Professor of the University of Chicago, international political scientist John Mearsheimer:

  • I constantly encounter broken logic. For example, everyone is saying that Ukraine is winning – Russia is suffering huge losses, and Ukrainians are regaining their territories. But when you look at the figures for the exchange of dead bodies, the ratio is from 1 to 20, and even 1 to 40. A huge number of Ukrainian remains versus a relatively small number of Russians. Where’s the logic? If Russia is suffering huge losses, the ratio should be the opposite! They object to me: the Russians are constantly attacking and picking up their own. But how can they attack if we simultaneously hear that Ukrainians are regaining territories? Where’s the logic?
  • Let’s talk about losses. The New York Times just published an article about the ratio of losses, where losses refer to those killed on the battlefield, plus the wounded. The Times cites an estimate of the number of dead on both sides, which is based on data from the Washington-based think tank CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies). So the newspaper writes that 450,000 Russians were killed, and somewhere between 125,000 and 150,000 Ukrainians. Well, let’s say there are 150,000 Ukrainians and 450,000 Russians. A ratio of 1 to 3. That is, for every Ukrainian killed, there are three Russians. But this is impossible to believe. This can’t be true. I don’t understand how they came up with these figures?
  • The main losses on the battlefield, as is well known, are caused by artillery fire. Throughout most of the war, the Russians have maintained an advantage in artillery, with various estimates of 5 to 1, 7 to 1, and even 10 to 1. And so-called smart bombs, guided artillery shells, dropped from the sky? The Russians have countless arsenals of these bombs, which they constantly rain down on the heads of Ukrainians. But the Ukrainians, in turn, have almost none of these bombs.
  • To those who say that the Russians are constantly attacking (and picking up bodies), there’s also something to object to. Firstly, the Ukrainians also attacked a lot. Just remember the Kursk operation. Or their famous summer counteroffensive in 2023, which was supposed to turn into a blitzkrieg, take Ukraine to the Azov Sea, and split the Russian front in two. In the first year of the war, the Russians suffered two defeats when the Ukrainians attacked near Kherson and Kharkov. Not to mention the current counteroffensive actions of the Ukrainian army. That is, Ukraine attacked a lot in this war, so it’s impossible to say that it’s always on the defensive, and in the defensive, the army suffers fewer losses and therefore, it’s not surprising to see the figures from The New York Times.
  • No, using such arguments, these figures cannot be explained. They’re meaningless. I think that when we eventually learn the real figures, there will be a million losses on the Ukrainian side. And that’s just the dead. To say 150,000 is ridiculous and meaningless.
  • Nevertheless, all this is presented as “facts” and on the basis of these “facts”, people are trying to assess what is happening between Russia and Ukraine now and guess what our next steps should be. It’s impossible to believe these figures, they’re ridiculous. But there are those who believe them. And they, relying on these figures, advocate for raising the stakes in the game against Russia, increasing support for Ukraine, breaking Russia and ending it as a great power. There are many such people.
  • I ask myself: “What’s the matter with them? Are they just making it up? Taking figures out of thin air? I’m talking about The New York Times. No, hardly. Rather, they themselves trust these figures. Objectivity blinds them, and they don’t notice it. But, alas, in the end, we have elites who have convinced themselves of what they believe. This is a false narrative, but they are guided by it and continue to move forward.“]

“Ukraine” (support for the corrupt, shambolic, and brutal regime in Kiev) has become a kind of totem for the decadent political class in Western Europe. At the same time, their own societies are falling apart via migration invasion, finance-capitalist exploitation, and rightly-disenchanted and angry native populations.

British people, in overwhelming majority, want them gone. Lawless predators and scavengers have no place in a civilized society.

TV journalist types (who probably live in Hampstead, or Blackheath, or some other affluent area where “travellers” do not go or live) think that you can reason with them. Pathetic. Not a word they say can be trusted or taken seriously.

The Guardian published some reportage recently about the line of “fortress”-cities still holding the line for the Kiev regime: https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2026/jul/03/kill-zones-drone-nets-journey-ukraine-fortress-belt.

Ursula von der Leyen— an evil little sprite.

As blogged about previously.

It would not matter if the population of the UK were reduced to a million, or even 100,000, so long as that number consisted of real English/British: see

Late tweets

Trump, like many Americans, seems to think that if American or Israeli forces bomb people, those people being bombed should somehow like those bombing them. Fatally naive.

Time and again the EU has proven that it is not a real democratic organization but just a well-disguised oligarchy. The same goes for the UK political system, incidentally.

Diary Blog, 30 June 2026

Afternoon music

[https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9s_Segovia]
[painting by Volegov]

Tweets seen

cf. Farage, Tice etc…

Translates to a Commons with perhaps about 251 Reform UK MPs (about 75 short of a Commons absolute majority), 113 Lab (official Opposition), 95 Cons, 61 LibDems, 48 Greens, 45 SNP, 13 Plaid Cymru [etc].

Only workable for Reform if an accommodation is made with the Con Party.

If Reform becomes the government, but then fails to accomplish much —as I am expecting— the way may finally be (blasted) open for social nationalism.

Incidentally, on those figures it is not unlikely that the seats presently held by both Starmer and Burnham will fall.

[“Latest on Burnham’s plans:

  • As PM he will spend a minimum of a day a week in “No.10 North”
  • He will not use No.10 as his main residence. His primary home will remain in the North West
  • Senior advisors have already begun work on establishing the Northern Downing Street.”]

Burnham, who is not yet either Labour Party leader or Prime Minister, is rapidly beginning to irritate the hell out of most people outside a 50-mile radius of Manchester…

British people are going to have to become far more hardnosed, both against migrant-invaders and (even more) against the treacherous politicians (national and local), newspaper scribblers, TV and radio talking-heads, and pro-immigration “activists” etc, which are all working against the future of the British people.

More System propaganda, designed to placate and fool the British people (voters).

Kemi Badenoch is a prime example. Her parents deliberately had her born in London so that, as the pre-1981 law stood, she would later have the “right” to claim British citizenship, which she did when she returned to the UK about 17 years later (she was brought up in Nigeria and the USA).

One has to admit that her parents’ cynical ploy worked well! Look at her! Both MP and Conservative Party leader! Despite her only having been here since age 17 or 18. How many Brits are MPs in Nigeria? That’s right…none at all.

At the end of the day, if catastrophe engulfs the world, we shall need only a few hundred thousand people in the UK (as the entire population), or even as few as 50,000, but that relatively tiny population, as a seed population, has to be entirely European-race.

See also:

More tweets seen

The only mistake the Anglo-Americans made after 1918 that was worse than allowing the Jews to create a Jewish state in Palestine in 1948 was to war against the German Reich during 1939-45 (UK) and 1941-45 (USA).

There was a KGB officer called Yevstigneyev based in Switzerland during (I think) the 1970s and/or 1980s; may or may not be an elder relative of that lady.

Looks as though the Poles are waking up.

Yvette Cooper. Labour Friends of Israel. Proven expenses cheat and blodging freeloader who was lucky to escape prosecution. Pro-immigration. Pro-censorship. An enemy of the people.

Having said that, look at idiots like those voters in Makerfield recently. Over 50% of those that actually bothered to vote, voted Labour. Well, and as we know, “if you want a n***** for a neighbour, vote Labour“…and so they did! Utter cretins. So we know that somewhere between a third and (over) half of Makerfield people are content to have the country further trashed by migration invasion. As far as I am concerned, any English people of that sort are not worth having on board; they can just disappear, or whatever.

Late tweets

Our animal friends.

[“The British people are about to be screwed.

Labour is now openly working with international organisations like the European Convention on Human Rights, the United Nations Refugee Agency, & global multinationals, universities, & self-anointed ‘community groups’ to flood Britain with yet more migrants and refugees while forcing the British people to pay for it.

This is all in the detail of the latest plans.

What you see is not an attempt to ’empower’ the British people. Quite the opposite. It is to transfer power AWAY from the people to distant, unaccountable organisations that exist beyond the realm of our national democracy and to then use these to dramatically increase the number of refugees, asylum-seekers & immigrants coming into Britain.

Even worse, Labour is now doing this despite having failed to stop the boats, fix the borders, and restore any sense of public confidence and trust in the system.

They are now also rapidly backtracking on other plans to tighten up indefinite leave to remain, happily handing the British people a bill of some £600 billion that will be left by giving millions of low-wage Boriswave migrants the right to stay in Britain forever, despite the British people voting for the very opposite of this, in 2019.

Labour say we need more safe and legal routes to help stop illegal migration but this is bonkers. We gave 5 million people legal routes into Britain during the Boriswave and yet another 200,000 illegals still came into the country. Wake up, folks.

The end result, I fear, will be total chaos, accelerating demographic change, instability, and the further erosion of public trust in politics and even democracy itself.

Nobody voted for this. Nobody asked for this. And only a very few fanatics in Labour & the Greens want this.

The only good news is that by veering sharply to the left on immigration and asylum, and by completely giving up on any claim to represent the British people, there will now be enormous space in British politics for a party to connect with the decent majority of hardworking Brits who have had enough of the constant gaslighting and lying in Westminster, and had enough of being treated like second-class citizens in their own country.

And Reform UK will fill this space.

We will speak up for the broad coalition of decent Brits who can now sense and see that they are being completely screwed over, and who know there is nothing “fair” about constantly putting the rest of the world ahead of your own taxpaying citizens.“]

Goodwin says that voting Reform will “do de business”. No.

I have nothing against people voting Reform or Restore or whatever, but the fact is that, since Blair’s repressive laws, the UK electoral system has been monitored, controlled, and rigged, and no real social-national party can achieve any measure of power via the ballot box.

Late music

[Chateau Frontenac, Quebec, by night]

Diary Blog, 22 June 2026

Morning music

Tweets seen

That is the pro-EU lunatic in a Johnny Walker hat and strange costume who rants constantly using a loudhailer. I recall him blocking Whitehall a few years ago when my taxi was trying to get through. Luckily for him, I was not driving my own car.

Oliver Kamm. A half-Jew, and a very odd one. He has tweeted, or remarked to the Press, about me a few times in the past, and I featured him in a blog post: see

Ecce “democracy”…

Also, regard the msm scribblers and their world-view. According to Sam Coates, Burnham is at “peak popularity” because he managed, with the help of a massive Labour and sympathetic-msm campaign, to persuade half of the Makerfield voters who even bothered to vote (less than 60% of those eligible bothered to vote) to vote for him. Is that his supposed peak popularity, the votes of 25,000 residents of a Mancunian suburb?

That cannot be extrapolated to the rest of the country.

I believe that the name is in fact Roman Gofman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Gofman

His start as Director of MOSSAD has been unpromising: see https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/14/middleeast/roman-gofman-mossad-israel-intl.

That refers to the lunatic mentioned earlier, one Steve Bray. He was blasting out the Ode to Joy, from Beethoven’s 9th Symphony, from the Whitehall entrance to Downing Street.

Net, 11% would be more likely to vote Labour, not 19%.

Looks like Burnham might seriously dent the Green Party vote, though. That might make it possible for Labour to retain Starmer’s seat at Holborn and St. Pancras, which will soon become the scene of another by-election. The Greens will be the main challengers there.

[“One of the worst prime ministers in British history.

Promised change but delivered yet more managed decline.

Promised competence but ran our economy into the ground.

Promised higher standards in public life but presided over a string of scandals that began with himself pilfering the pockets of Lord Alli.

Promised to work for the national interest while trying to sell off our national territory, refusing to invest in our national defence, alienating our closest allies, and incentivising our enemies.

Promised to be “on the side of British workers” while throwing them under the bus through the India trade deal, mass immigration, tax hikes for farmers, & making it far more expensive to actually hire British workers in this country.

Promised to deliver “fairness” while imposing an extreme policy of broken borders while forcing the British people to pay billions for it, allowing private firms like Serco to outbid the British people and favour illegal migrants in our own housing market, mainstreaming two-tier injustice, and shrugging his shoulders as every 1 young Brit who gets a job is undercut by 27 young foreigners getting a job in our own labour market.

Promised to be “tolerant” while being uniquely intolerant of people who merely hold different beliefs, clamping down on free speech at every opportunity, throwing people into jail for what they write on social media, and curbing our ability to debate Islam.

Promised to “work for the British people” while never grasping why the people wanted a national inquiry into the mass r*pe and sexual abuse of hundreds of thousands of their own children — and calling them “far right” for wanting truth and justice.

And all done with the tone of a sanctimonious, pompous head teacher, scolding the British people for problems his own party helped create, then made worse, and then called “progress”.

Good-bye Keir Starmer.

And good riddance!!

Full piece below.”]

Goodwin of course fails to mention Starmer’s adherence to Israel and the Jewish lobby. Another count on the indictment.

Also, Starmer failed to keep his dignity at the end. Adolf Hitler kept his despite facing utter military defeat, and knowing that he would be shooting himself shortly. All Starmer faces is a well-remunerated seat in the House of Lords, and a multi-million book deal in due course.

Pathetic.

[“Right then … let’s have a look at the 2 potential PMs with no mandate. Wes Streeting or Andy Burnham will NOT change the globalist direction of travel

Streeting attended Bilderberg in 2025 while serving as Health Secretary and overseeing NHS digital transformation in which Palantir plays a central role. The CEO of Palantir also attended as did the President of the WEF, NATO’s Secretary General, major bankers & AI company founders,

Burnham’s Manchester administration embraced policies aligned with net zero targets, UN Sustainable Development Goals and participation in global city networks. The names may change, but the agenda doesn’t. There is far too much at stake to back off now.“]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_S%C3%A1nchez

[“The wife of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez of Spain will stand trial on charges of corruption and influence peddling as first lady, a judge ruled on Saturday.

Begoña Gómez has been under investigation since 2024, after a self-described anti-graft group filed a complaint accusing her of supporting a bid for a public contract by a group of companies to which she has personal and professional ties. Ms. Gómez has denied the accusations, but a judge in Madrid ruled there was enough evidence for the first lady to stand trial.

Judge Juan Carlos Peinado brought charges of embezzlement, corruption, misappropriation of funds and influence peddling against Ms. Gómez and ordered her to surrender her passport to officials and to report to a court every 15 days. A trial date has not been set.

“Behaviors such as these emanating from presidential palaces seem more characteristic of absolutist regimes, thankfully long forgotten in our country,” the judge said in an 84-page ruling.”]

[New York Times]

https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/spain-corruption-scandal-pedro-sanchez-g2jwhxh27

Yes. The 2024 Labour vote was only about 1 point above that of 2019, when Corbyn was Labour leader.

I expect that Starmer’s next stop will be another photo-opportunity with the corrupt Jew dictator in Kiev.

Look at the whole long list…

Le monde des singes Paris.

I have certainly noticed, recently, that many tweets supportive of me are not immediately visible.

There seems to be a definite push for actual war, hot war, between NATO states and Russia. Russia is not driving this; it is being driven by secretive cabals and ruling circles in the West, connected with the (((usual suspects))).

Mad.

Late music

[Victor Ostrovsky, Moment of Truth]

Diary Blog, 21 June 2026

Morning music

[St. Michael’s Victory Over the Devil, Coventry Cathedral facade]

Tweets seen

BBC TV News reported this morning that the Kiev regime has ordered individuals and businesses not to use fuel; it is reserved for governmental and military use until further notice. Electricity has also been restricted.

The (Russian) government in Crimea has also restricted fuel:

Looks as if the UK’s NWO/ZOG (New World Order/Zionist Occupation) Government is determined to expose the British people to the risk of thermonuclear war. Disgraceful.

If the Kiev regime starts to target Russia more deeply, more heavily, there is every chance that Kiev will be flattened, either by conventional or nuclear weapons. If that were to happen, more might happen.

Stop poking the Bear.

Basic Income will have to become normal at some point in the history of the present society.

More music

More tweets

As blogged here in the past. Now confirmed by a leading Jew fanatic-politician.

Gaza to be reduced to rubble, its inhabitants killed or maimed, then the survivors marched into the deserts and/or to Israeli-controlled concentration camps. After that, Gaza to be redeveloped and occupied by Jew settlers from Israel, USA and elsewhere (while Jewish developers make untold millions, of course).

Lebensraum for Jews, but death and destitution for their victims of their violence and large-scale theft.

More tweets

Starmer-stein’s Jewish wife and Morgan McSweeney, the latter at the very least an agent of influence for Israel and the Jewish lobby.

Labour Friends of Israel.

(“Lady Starmer“…haha…).

The useful tools of Zionism are dispensed with after they have outlived their usefulness. Occasionally, “with extreme prejudice”, as in the matter of Robert “Maxwell”, often now considered to have been the number one MOSSAD agent in Europe. His daughter, Ghislaine, now languishing in a Federal prison (and, I think, awaiting a Trump Presidential pardon sometime around 2028), apparently believes that MOSSAD killed her father because he “knew too much”. Maybe.

Starmer-stein, though, is probably destined, in immediate terms, not for death but for interment or internment in the House of Lords.

[“Trump has imposed on European budgets the obligation to pay 350 billion dollars for weapons transferred to Ukraine under Biden. This amount exceeds the annual defense spending of most European countries and poses a risk of undermining their financial stability. European governments are not resisting this demand. Their political course remains tied to using the Ukrainian conflict for perpetual confrontation with Russia, even when this requires consent to the further destruction of Ukrainian infrastructure and economy and the acceptance of new costs for their own societies.

Official American allocations for programs related to Ukraine amounted to about 188 billion dollars by the end of 2025, of which direct aid to Ukraine was around 127 billion. Trump applies an estimate of 350 billion dollars, which includes the cost of systems withdrawn from reserves. Europe has provided comparable amounts of support. European forces depend on American platforms and intelligence products, which limits the possibility of rapid replacement.

After the cessation of Russian gas supplies, Europe increased its purchases of American LNG. Imports from the US tripled between 2021 and 2025, reaching 75.6 billion cubic meters. This provided American producers with additional income. Germany’s industrial capacity decreased by about 15% compared to 2017. Some production facilities have moved to regions with lower energy costs amid rising prices and the loss of trade with Russia.

The military expenditures of European NATO members in 2025 increased by 14% and reached 559 billion dollars. Germany increased its spending to 114 billion dollars, or 2.3% of GDP. In 2025 alone, Europe sent 21.5 billion dollars in military aid to Ukraine. The direct damage to Ukrainian infrastructure by the end of 2025 was 195 billion dollars. The reconstruction needs for a decade amount to 588 billion dollars. The policy does not stop the depletion of the Ukrainian economy and demography.

The demand to pay 350 billion dollars confronts European capitals with the need to accept additional debt burden or enter into conflict with Washington. The American side controls key elements of the European security system. The domestic political environment reinforces the line on escalating support for Kyiv. Any retreat carries risks of internal criticism and reduces the willingness to negotiate.

Accepting the demand without resistance shows that the political commitment to weakening Russia through the Ukrainian conflict dominates over economic sustainability calculations. Europe assumes the role of a financier of the confrontation, the parameters of which are determined outside its borders. The costs are distributed across European budgets and the industrial base, while the direct losses are concentrated on Ukraine. EU policy does not contain points for adjusting the course even when critical obvious losses to its own base accumulate.”]

Interesting video

Worth considering by Western people possessing the right skills.

Incidentally, the toxic plant the woman mentions as infesting her farm is what we call “hogweed”.

Might also be of use to “preppers” etc in other countries.

[“Celebrate the end of Starmer. But be realistic about what’s coming.

A major debt crisis. Record high taxes. Deteriorating public services as we are pushed further into a population trap. Rising unemployment, especially among the young. Selling out British workers through ongoing mass immigration. Tearing up the social contract through ongoing broken borders and two-tier ideology. Continuing the managed decline of the nation.

Changing leaders will not change our political economy. If anything, shifting left will make it worse.“]

You read it here first, of course.

As to “the end of Starmer“, much as I should like to add a few words about that, the conditions of near-State repression now existent in the UK render such comment…inadvisable…

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15916781/Mother-murdered-hotel-worker-told-tone-statement-police.html

Dystopian. Some version of what I fear this country is turning into.

Talking point

The same is true, mutatis mutandis, in the UK (and the rest of Western and Central Europe, including Scandinavia).

More tweets

Quite.

Burnham won his by-election on 54.8% of a 58.8% turnout. About 32% of all eligible voters (including non-voters). The other 68% either did not vote (in many cases probably because they wanted something very radical) or voted elsewhere, mostly for Reform or Restore (all other candidates lost their deposits; the Con Party scored only 2.2%, and all others were well under 1% each).

The Guardian hailed that underwhelming result as “Andy Burnham wins huge victory“. Pathetic.

The System newspapers, TV etc are all invested in Burnham as the new Great White Hope, someone whose supposed “vision” will save the existing political system and parties…they hope.

Hard to remember now, for many, but when Starmer-stein became Prime Minister, only 2 years ago, he too was hailed as something wonderful by the msm. Some stupid woman scribbler in the Guardian even gushed about how she felt suddenly sexually attracted to him!

What a difference two years (and reality) make…

In days of yore, before Mrs. Thatcher closed off Downing Street, I occasionally used it as a short-cut. Early 1980s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street#Security_gates.

MSM drones such as Lewis Goodall naturally cannot bear anyone saying or tweeting, or blogging, the truth…

I have said for years that football, and most other sports in the UK, USA, EU states etc, now consist of what my be described as the boast that “my blacks can beat your blacks.”

Ironically, the only sport —racing— in which, at one time, in South Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana, and parts of the Caribbean, blacks were the only participants (young black boys riding bareback as jockeys) is now one of the few (certainly in the UK and mainland Europe) in which there are almost no blacks riding (and I think in the USA too, to a large extent).

The way that Flat season jockeys especially now ride, almost on the necks of the horses, was first developed by those small black boys in the Southern states of the USA in the 18thC.

…together with the fake “Conservatives” (especially under “Boris”-idiot) and the LibDem clowns.

A massive majority” but, crucially, of Commons seats in an outdated and rigged electoral system, not in terms of popular vote.

The Starmer-Labour popular vote in 2024 was only 33.7% of all votes cast (only about 1 point up on the 2019 General Election and Corbyn-Labour), and that gave Labour over 63% of all Commons seats. Ridiculous.

In fact, fewer than 60% of eligible voters even voted. Starmer’s active voter support or citizen support was, even in 2024, no more than 20% in reality. People also voted, mainly, or most of them, to get Sunak and the Con Party out, not specifically to get Starmer-Labour in.

The Con Party vote in 2019 had been 43.63%; that fell to 23.7% st GE 2024.

In short, Starmer-Labour won GE 2024 by default, and won big by reason of the outdated/flawed/rigged electoral system.

What I mean by “rigged” is the boundaries drawn to preserve fake “fairness” and a two-tone, or at most three-sided, result.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Kingdom_general_election#Full_results

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_United_Kingdom_general_election#Full_results

Jess Phillips really seems to think that she was re-elected despite Starmer, maybe even despite being a Labour candidate, but when you look at those who lose their main-party approval and try to get re-elected purely on their own popularity, not many do. Corbyn is the only ex-Labour one that comes to mind.

Jess Phillips: pro-Jewish lobby, pro-Israel, and one of the worst freeloaders in the Commons. God knows why anyone would want her as an MP.

See also:

As previously blogged, nothing Trump now says can be relied upon, not even for a single day.

…and that is just the conventional, non-nuclear, arsenal. Give Russia Eastern Ukraine, the Black Sea littoral, and a condominium status in Kiev, and establish a rump Ukrainian state centred on Lvov. I have been suggesting that as a suitable outcome for 4 years now.

Late thought about BBC TV News

Saw about 10 mins of the BBC TV News broadcast earlier. Some non-white woman was reading the news. I can just about tolerate “Keeev” for Kiev (well, only just— it is ludicrous), and that seems to be BBC house style at present, but the woman then referred to the Colombian capital, Bogota, as something like “Bargaaartar“.

For God’s sake, if you cannot find any educated or semi-educated (real) British people to read out your tendentious propaganda, at least get a non-white who can pronounce such a name as as Bogota without sounding utterly stupid.

Late music

Diary Blog, 19 June 2026

Afternoon music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Victorian_Kitchen_Garden; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Reade]

Talking point

Makerfield by-election

Well, Burnham won. Not unexpected. The msm is going mad with this supposed great turning-point etc. Rather overblown, as is their contention that all Labour (or both of the main System parties) needed to do was to change horses, and both Reform and Restore would be left behind.

Not quite. At the 2024 General Election, Labour scored 45.2% at Makerfield, and Reform UK scored 31.8%. At the 2026 by-election, the Labour vote was 54.8%, so higher but not stunningly so, and the Reform vote was 34.5%, also higher than in 2024, despite the challenge from Restore Britain (6.8%) which did not exist in 2024.

While Reform and Restore together scored well below Labour’s vote, that combined vote still added up to 41.3%; quite respectable. Over 41% of the total of eligible voters did not vote at all, a sign that many are either apathetic or more radical than Reform and Restore.

Prior to the vote, enemy of the people Lisa Nandy made some foolish comment that “about 6% or 7%” of the Makerfield electorate were “racists” who would vote for any anti-immigration party. 6% or 7%. Now see the combined Reform/Restore vote— over 41%.

I think that several factors contributed to Burnham’s win. The split Reform/Restore was one. True, the two parties still scored a total below that of Burnham-Labour, but that might not have been the case had only one party stood.

Then there is the hullabaloo and msm reportage about how Burnham would unseat the hated Starmer-stein, and about Burnham’s supposed more radical and/or active ideas to improve life in the North of England. Unconvincing to me, but apparently not to many Northern English voters.

The other interesting parts of the by-election result were the poor showings of the Conservatives and LibDems.

The Conservatives scored only 2.2% at the by-election, and lost their deposit. In 2024, their vote had been 10.9%, and in 2019, 34.4%.

The LibDems scored only 0.4% at the by-election (a mere 163 votes) as against 6.8% in 2024.

An indication of how far the credibility of both parties, Con and LibDem, has fallen in parts of the country.

Tweets seen

The so-called “vaccines” have done huge and hugely underreported damage to millions.

The growing anger and frustration of the British people may be expressed, by 2029, in Parliamentary form, or in some other form(s).

I remain far from convinced that the “our Andy” show (complete with “our communities” and “our NHS“) will travel well anywhere very far south (or north, or east) of Manchester.

I saw a minute of so, on BBC TV News, of Burnham speaking today. He wants to “re-industrialise the North (of England)” (how? has he never heard of China?) and spread much money here and there. For me, not at all convincing or even interesting.

The Irish “tinker” or “traveller” element is also, of course, notorious for such activity. Others too.

I can recall, from when I was staying in some hotel on the Corniche in Alexandria (Egypt) in 1998, looking from my balcony and noticing an obviously wealthy Egyptian family in a large Mercedes stop, and a little girl, obviously instructed to do so, exit from the vehicle with all their fast food boxes and paper bags, and simply dump them over the parapet into the beautiful blue sea of the Eastern Harbour, which sea once would have been seen by Cleopatra, Mark Antony, Julius Caesar and Caesar Augustus, not to mention Churchill and others.

If anyone is interested in a little more of my reminiscence of my 1998 visit to Egypt, please see:

[“If anyone doubts the power of community action over the @EnvAgency’s spineless inertia, you can walk to the outskirts of Ilford & walk along an ancient lost river to see for yourself.

With 10 days of intense effort by dedicated volunteers, the river River Roding Trust managed to clean up & restore 250 metres of the Aldersbrook (about 1/3 of the brook). This allows a direct comparison between the parts of the brook we restored & those we haven’t got round to yet.

These photos & videos are all from May 2026. The first is on a part of the Aldersbrook still to be restored & shows the old flood defences which are no longer needed & are killing the river but which the EA won’t remove unless we volunteers pay them £50,000 just for surveys.

These defences have caused 2-3ft of stinking sludge & silt to build up over 70 years, such that the water in the brook is just a few centimetres deep. Combine with huge amounts of rubbish & and out of control knotweed infestation & the river ecosystem is essentially dead.

A river that is older than England destroyed by official indifference.

A hundred metres away, and it’s a different story. The rubbish & the invasive species (I sprayed the knotweed myself last autumn) are gone. The silt that used to clog the river is now spread on the banks & rapidly providing fertile ground for native plants. Instead of sludge, there’s 2-3ft of water, so fish have returned to the brook for the first time in decades, along with dragon flies, herons & a nesting moorhen.

We river guardians knew our intervention would make a difference, but have been shocked at quite how quickly nature has come back. The restored Aldersbrook is now a rare jewel: pretty much the last fully natural tidal brook in London. The EA now has a choice. It can salvage some good from this situation & work with us to restore the remaining sections of the brook, or it can continue to do nothing. If the latter, river guardians *will* be back this winter to finish the job & the EA can see how well prosecuting volunteers for restoring a river without permission goes for them.“]

Bravo.

[“Around the country, a huge tree planting programme of our most important native tree is underway. But no bureaucrat decreed it in a policy paper, & it relies on no government funding. This mass planting is being carried out by nature herself.

2025 was a ‘mast year’ for acorns. In order to have the best chance of reproducing, some trees like oaks all produce a huge amount of acorns in the same year. This sheer abundance overwhelms creatures like squirrels that snack on the nuts, as they simply can’t eat them all.

Now, in woodlands & fields across the country, we see the results of this self-directed tree planting. Huge carpets of baby oaks that in some places are so thick they look like a grassy green lawn. I’ve honestly never seen so many oak saplings in my lifetime & this scene is all the more incredible given the oaks somehow knew to coordinate their reproduction like this.

Although this planting effort is natural, there are some things that humans can do to help. As self-sown oaks are usually significantly more vigorous & healthy than nursery grown saplings, encouraging these oaks will likely lead to much better trees than through planting.

What you can do depends on the local circumstances. Sometimes they can just be left to their own devices. If they have sown themselves in a area of high footfall, consider putting rocks or logs round them to stop trampling. If they are in an area with lots of deer, consider putting tree protectors round them, or fencing off areas of them. If we have a dry spell, watering your chosen oaks might help them through the dry patch. In choosing which of the many oaks out there you want to support, concentrate on those outside of the canopy of existing trees, where they will get light (the saplings under the shade of existing oaks are unlikely to make it long-term). You could also consider giving them light by removing invasive species (like rhododendron) or cutting back less ecologically useful trees (like sycamore), or potentially scrub (if there are no deer about) that are covering the baby oaks.

With a little bit of care, you could be helping to nurture a tree that will last for 500 years or more!“]

[“For every tear of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must weep. All of Lebanon must burn!

With all due respect to the Americans, Israel must make it clear to the entire world that the blood of our sons and the security of our citizens are not forfeit. All of Lebanon must burn. Our supreme duty is to protect the citizens of Israel and the soldiers of the IDF, and this commitment takes precedence over every other consideration.

I told the Prime Minister, even in our private meetings: For every tear of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must weep.

Enough with the ping-pong. In the Middle East, you don’t win with measured responses and restraint—you need to go berserk. To obliterate. To crush the terror.“]

[Ben Gvir]

That crazy Jew is disowned even by many other Jews.

Late music

[Victor Ostrovsky, Showing Heart]

Diary Blog, 18 June 2026

Morning music

[Roman Bozhkov, Morning Music]

Tweets seen

The patience of the Russian leadership with this increasingly-serious shadow-boxing with the Kiev regime must be wearing thin.

(ps. the “Ian” there is not me but another Ian).

I may not “support” “Tommy Robinson”, as such (because he is controlled or too-influenced by the Israel-lobby), but he has a point here, of course.

I hope so, and that that is not a smoke-and-mirrors job designed to keep massive non-European hordes in Europe.

In the present age, trains should be run by the State as a strategic part of the economy, and fares kept reasonably low. At present, in the UK, we are getting the worst of both worlds: high prices combined with poor services (often) and the taxpayers funding private profits.

Those ticket prices London-Wigan are just insane.

Labour ministers and “comms” drones imagine that winning the Makerfield by-election (assuming that they do) will effectively crush both Reform UK and Restore Britain. I doubt it, but even were that so, it will not crush the justified and growing anger of the British people (including, in coming years, those in Makerfield) at migration invasion, environmental collapse, falls in living standards (and all other standards) etc.

Incidentally, “GOTV” = “Get Out The Vote”. Labour is throwing everything at this by-election. Desperate.

As said…desperate…

A few drone strikes, however destructive, on Moscow or other cities, will not change the arithmetic in the overall battlefield space.

I see Russian tweets etc claiming capture of villages, small settlements etc; from the Ukrainian side, not even that. The claimed Ukrainian advances must be either over depopulated areas of farmland and woodland or, at least as likely, non-existent.

The elephant in the room, surely, is the fact that Putin and the Russian leadership are not using more than a few percent, maybe less than one percent, of their potential destructive power. Russia has 7,000 nuclear weapons.

Would seem to indicate, if typical, that Russia is losing only 1 soldier killed for every 15 Ukrainian soldiers.

[“Labour has no right to win Makerfield, by @bnhwalker.

If Labour wins in Makerfield it will have been down to one man: Andy Burnham. In the most recent local elections every one of the individual council wards in Makerfield went Reform’s way. Nigel Farage’s party secured 50 per cent of the vote compared to Labour’s 25 per cent. Labour has never done so badly in Wigan. Whatever the capacities of one candidate, Reform should be winning it. The Makerfield constituency polls put Andy Burnham ahead by between 5-12 points.”]

There are 650 constituencies in the UK and Northern Ireland. I do not believe that any Burnham Bounce will swing (even in 2026) more than 50 of them. In any case, once (if it happens) Burnham is “crowned” PM, he will be faced with the same issues as Starmer-stein. Will he have better answers, or outcomes? I very much doubt that.

By 2029, this country will be even angrier and/or more desperate.

[“People vote in extraordinary ways in by-elections. They’ll even vote tactically for a party they can’t stand if it achieves the goal of a bloody nose to the party they backed last time. Honestly the way Labour has flooded Makerfield and the shocking machinations of Simons & Burnham would have me moving from abstention to considering in the privacy of the ballot booth a way of holding my nose to deliver a bloody nose. And as an ex-Tory I’m prepared to give LDs or Labour a hearing, I’m much closer to them on a few things than any of the (very) right-wing parties, that speaks to my natural and growing Burnham antipathy. The Our Andy stuff has been insufferable even from a distance.”]

UK Government aggression towards Russia is veering into the territory of outright war. Supplying the Kiev regime with 150,000 drones (presumably funded by the British taxpayer, at that) is tantamount to the UK taking a very active and direct part in the war. Mad.

As said before, Britain has never had any substantial connection with Ukraine, not in the thousand years of Ukraine’s history as effectively part of Russia, and not in its mere 35 years as a corrupt and shambolic notionally independent state. None.

Now the anti-British “British” government is launching what amounts to a military campaign against Russia in order to support the corrupt and brutal Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev. People should be asking why…

Were I a resident of Kiev, I should be packing my bags. Frankly, if this continues, the same might be said of London.

Exactly.

Exactly.

As said, the absurd thing is that, if Labour wins the by-election, nothing in fact changes and, outside the Manchester area, I doubt that Burnham is much of a gamechanger electorally.

I just read the brief Iran-US agreement. It is 90% in Iran’s favour, if not 100%. After 60 days, fees chargeable by Iran to all other states’ shipping to ship through the Strait of Hormuz; Iran oil exports to start again; Iranian assets to be unfrozen worldwide; a USD $300 BILLION fund (payable presumably by the USA) for the reconstruction of Iran (after the American and Israeli bombing and missile attacks); an Iranian pledge not to develop nuclear weapons (a promise already in place before the war anyway).

The USA has learned a lesson. Do not let the Jews (whether in Israel or the USA itself) dictate your foreign policy. Do not let the tail wag the dog.

A strategic disaster for both the USA and Israel, and the fault for it lies with Netanyahu and Israel, and with Trump. A TV personality and speculative businessman does not a statesman nor a strategist make, in most cases.

F.O.! Hegseth, you idiot— and take your Jews and (now-demented) Trump with you.

Something that, as I have noticed this week, people across the political spectrum agree upon. A horrible crime even in a country of (now) often horrible crimes.

That case also makes it clear that children of any age should never be condemned to be adopted by gay men in performative “marriage” “cosplays” (same goes for crazed lesbian couples).

Our animal friends. It is good to see something natural and pure after so much human degeneracy.

All roads lead to Rome, but…yes.

…or Russian, for that matter.

(in fact, there was never a serious possibility of German forces invading the UK in or around 1940, and there is no possibility of Russia taking over the UK in 2026).

Apparently an AI fake.

[Update, later same day: some msm outlets are now saying it is genuine. If so, mad…].

Incidentally, that “Crewkerne Man” is none other than Joshua Bonehill, or Bonehill-Paine, who used to put himself forward, about a decade or so ago, as a coming sort-of “national socialist”-style “Fuhrer” of the UK.

Bonehill-Paine tried to organize anti-Jew marches and would-be semi-pogroms in Golders Green and Central London (I think that 6 or 7 idiots actually turned up).

Bonehill-Paine was then, after a number of both political and non-political criminal convictions, imprisoned for many months, over a year in fact. In prison, he turned, or was turned, or brainwashed (?), from “antisemitism” to Judaeo-philia.

“Bonehill-Paine first questioned his antisemitic views during his second year in prison, after reading the Bible, and enrolled on a deradicalisation course via his probation officer.[4]” [Wikipedia]

Q.E.D.

Now, recently filmed looking 30+ years older than he did only a decade ago, he is apparently a supporter of the washed-up “Conservative” Party, is ludicrously pro-Jew and pro-Israel, and is even promoted by Israeli media outlets (as seen on his Twitter/X banner).

Very very strange.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Bonehill-Paine

Crewkerne Man meets Manchurian Candidate?

Late tweets seen

Unbelievable.

Mirabile dictu! I actually agree with Ed Davey on something…

Incredible that a supposed “top businesswoman” (Deborah Meaden) can be so dim; there again, it is a common fallacy that the very wealthy (even those who inherited riches) must somehow be highly intelligent, and very knowledgeable. Often, not so.

As for multikulti “Conservative” drone Fraser Nelson, I have written about him on the blog in the past. Nothing he writes is worth reading.

The very terminology is outdated. “Working class” is almost as passé as what Ernest Bevin once called “the jolly old proletariat“.

As noted on the blog for several years, drones have changed the face of warfare, especially infantry warfare. This is only the start.

In the end, Burnham will be same-old, even if he runs Starmer out of town.

At the 2024 General Election, and in very rough figures, for every 20 eligible voters 8 did not vote at all; 4 out of the 20 voted Labour, 3 voted Conservative, 2 voted Reform, 2 voted LibDem, and 1 voted Green.

Starmer-Labour, as I blogged 2 years ago, only had the active electoral support of a third of those that actually voted in 2024, and a mere fifth of all of those eligible to vote.

Now? About half of the 2024 figures.

Opinion polling suggests that Labour, even under Burnham, would be the choice of only around 26% of voters were there a GE any time soon.

By 2029, Burnham-Labour, if Burnham does take over, will probably be running in the polls at around 20% at best. Will Labour try to change the rules, as they are presently doing in Manchester re. the mayoral by-election?

There is no “Parliamentary road” for us, but elections may yet be a peripheral part of the way forward.

Our animal friends.

Yes, foxes kill chickens, such is their nature, so just ensure your chickens etc are protected, that’s all. Good fences make good neighbours.

Late music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Makarova]
[Pushkin Boulevard, Donetsk]

Diary Blog, 17 June 2026

Morning music

[Lincoln’s Inn, London, with view of Chapel frontage]

Blast from the past

I happened to see and to re-read a blog post from exactly 2 years ago. I said, inter alia:

[“Khrushchev, in his memoirs, said that (putting it in the language of 2024) an office-bod or bureaucrat type of person (he was thinking of Malenkov) was the very last type who should ever be given power.

Starmer is exactly that type. A sterile black-letter legal type, beholden to the UK Jewish lobby and Israel lobby; probably a freemason too. He will soon be an “elected” dictator by default, purely because the “Conservative” misgovernment is simply incapable of governing at all.

Starmer and Labour, on their own merits, would struggle to get elected. That they are now superficially popular by default is just absurd. They are not at all popular, but there is nothing in their way now. Less than two and a half weeks to go before Election Day, and the Conservative Party will be lucky to retain 50 MPs, in my opinion (which has been my opinion on the blog for months). (The “experts” are still saying 100-200).

Starmer is about to institute a kind of tyranny, for the benefit of transnational finance-capitalism and, of course, (((the usual))) “cosmopolitan” interests.”]

See:

Well, if I say so myself, who shouldn’t, I was pretty much right in calling it. I concede to having been wrong in thinking that the Conservative Party MP-cadre might reduce from 372 to 50 (it reduced to 121); next time, perhaps.

I think that I have been proven right as to the rest, though.

Tweets seen

Ha ha! Brilliant! Brava! that woman!

See also:

Steady though very slow advance. Russia needs a sudden and devastating gamechanger.

[“IN THE NEXT DAYS (WEEK), UKRAINE WILL LOSE CONTROL OVER KONSTANTINOVKA, KUPYANSK, AND LYMAN
The Russians have liberated New Donbas – they have reached five kilometers from Dobropolje

With the capture of Dobropolje, Russian forces will be able to flank Druzhkovka from the southwest and approach the much larger and more important Kramatorsk.”]

If Russian forces can advance on and take Kramatorsk, that will be a significant marker or milestone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramatorsk

[Kramatorsk, main square]

How much can they be paying him to so besmirch not only his own honour, but also his own basic credibility?

Our animal friends.

The CPS is afraid of the various “ethnic” lobbies, in this case the Sikh lobby, but more usually the Muslim lobby and (most of all) the Jewish lobby: see

In 2021, Stephen Silverman of the malicious Jewish “Campaign Against Antisemitism” fake charity (ethno-political pressure group) made a quite deliberate and false allegation against me to the police (see the first of the three blog posts noted above), to the effect that I had “racially harassed” him.

Completely false. Indeed, all harassment has been in the other direction, for years. I had never contacted the bastard, never seen him/it, and did not even have his/its contact details, address etc.

I was never charged with the invented “crime”, but the police should have charged Silverman. He quite plainly committed an attempt to pervert the course of justice, as well as the lesser crime of wasting police time. Was never charged.

I blame myself in part. I should have made an official complaint to the police against Silverman in 2021 or 2022; I am just not the kind of person who is always “reporting” people (if “people” is the bon mot)…

“Multicultural” countries cannot survive as nations, and can only survive as enforced states, kept in one piece by severe laws restricting free speech, political activity, protest, dissidence etc. This is now where Britain is. Policing has become nakedly political, and that also applies to the prosecution of offences.

The monkey may be changed, but not the organ-grinder(((s))), nor the music played.

Translates to a Commons with about 325 Reform UK MPs (just short of a majority), 84 Cons (very weak official Opposition), 62 LibDems, 61 Lab, 45 SNP, 44 Greens [etc].

Once again, on those figures Starmer would lose his seat, as would any (?) Labour MP at Makerfield, the by-election for which is tomorrow.

Whoever this lady may vote for, anyone who has mixed-race grandchildren (or children) is, to that maybe small extent, helping those who are destroying Europe’s future.

Quite amusing to see the Twitter/X “antiracist” idiots replying to that brief clip. As usual, deploying the “thick as mince” and similar comments. They cannot see that they themselves, desperate (God knows why) to see Labour succeed at Makerfield), are the dim souls, thinking that more System Labour misrule is a good thing (and that yet more migration-invasion is somehow a good thing).

Well, that opinion poll may show a “Burnham Bounce” for Labour, but that is now. If the next GE is not until 2028 or 2029, the picture may have changed or changed back, after another year or more of Labour government.

Anyway, that poll seems to show that a GE today, but with Burnham as PM, would result in a Commons with about 276 Reform UK MPs (about 50 short of majority), Labour 194 (substantial Opposition), 62 LibDems, 37 Cons, 30 SNP, and 25 Greens [etc].

That would be a completely hung Parliament, and with a minority Reform government unable to find the 50+ extra votes needed to pass anything much.

Incidentally, on those figures, and with PM Burnham as MP for Makerfield, he might well lose his own seat unless able to buck the national trend…

Bear in mind, though, that Restore’s impact has not been much quantified yet.

Yvette Cooper, Angela Rayner, and Al Carns, all suggested/potential Labour leaders, would also lose their seats on those figures.

If Burnham wins tomorrow at Makerfield, he will therefore probably not call a GE but hang on until (?) 2029, probably getting less and less popular, but hoping that “something will turn up”. Meanwhile, nationalist and social-national resentment will build up a formidable head of steam in the country.

I suppose readers of the blog will expect me to make a prediction as to Makerfield.

A fool’s errand, really, but for what it may be worth, Labour does seem to be nailed on (maybe, though, not to the extent seen on the betting market, where Labour is now heavily odds-on at a fairly absurd 1/7).

I expect that there are many “secret” Reform (and Restore) voters, but whether there are enough to make a difference I do not know. It is said that 10%-15% of Makerfield voters remain uncertain or undecided.

I think that Reform are now unlikely to pull it off, partly by reason of the ad hominem attacks made on the Reform candidate, partly because Restore’s candidature has plainly split what would have been the Reform vote. A Reform victory, though, is still just about possible.

Well, in a day or so, we shall all know the result.

Late music

Diary Blog,16 June 2026

Tweets seen

Amazing clips of film.

Woolwich Crown Court is high-security. Prisoners are brought to court via an underground tunnel from the nearby Belmarsh Prison. I once had a friend at the Bar who, in the 1990s, did quite a lot of “heavy” crime there, crimes such as security-van jobs and the like.

Craig Murray was H.M. Ambassador to Uzbekistan at one time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Murray, and is now rather dissident.

As previously blogged, the Ukrainian Ambassador whom I accompanied sometime around 1995 to the UK’s biological warfare (etc) centre at Porton Down, Wiltshire, is now the director of a bio-lab in Ukraine: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serhiy_Komisarenko.

If any reader wants more information on that, use the blog search box.

Well said. Political leadership is not the same as being an Army or Royal Marines officer (you cannot simply command people and events, and decisions have to be more nuanced). As the tweeter says, neither is political leadership similar to being a senior legal figure such as the DPP (you cannot simply lay down rules and regulations and/or threaten to use “the full force of the law” when people do not agree).

Come to that, political leadership is also unalike to being a top-level businessman, as Trump is proving to the world. Not everyone wants to “make a deal“. Some people will not “make a deal” under any circumstances, because they or their group, clan, or people are motivated not by a quantifiable outcome such as profit and loss, but by ideology, or religion, or even a wish for “death or (and/or) glory”. Such people often do not much care if they themselves end up worse off (objectively) without a so-called “deal”.

Talking point

People, years ago, thought that Starmer-stein would be a Prime Minister fairly dull but at least intelligent, reliable, respectful of the idea of “a society under law”, and not likely to go off the rails in any serious way.

Well…people got the dull Prime Minister, but they also got a power-mad former bureaucrat willing to have protesters imprisoned for years for doing such petty crimes or non-crimes such as posting “inflammatory” tweets that few read and by which none were “incited”; same goes for idiotic young or not-young men willing to throw a few plastic wheelie bins towards a line of riot police.

The British people got, not a dull but reliable (and ethical) Prime Minister, but a petty tyrant forcing the entire nation to give large amounts of personal information to Israeli and other companies before being “allowed” to post on, or even use and/or read, Twitter/X, Facebook, YouTube etc.

They also got a Prime Minister willing to light Jewish-supremacist candlesticks in the windows of 10, Downing Street and in Trafalgar Square, and one willing to throw away enormous amounts of money “supporting” the Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev, while British people struggle without help.

The British people also got a crazed Prime Minister presiding over a migration invasion of enormous proportions, one which he has no plan to stop, and no intention of stopping.

More tweets

[“Head of the armed forces Sir Richard Knighton today: “We will have to dial back our activities and our exercise and operational activity if the level of resource funding that is available to us does not increase.”

Speaking at the G7 today, Keir Starmer made clear there will be no more money forthcoming.

John Healey’s resignation speech in the Commons later should be box office.”]

Ah, yes…I remember that Knighton person “cosplaying” in camouflage gear in Kiev a year or so ago [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Knighton].

In reality, any money spent on “defence” at present is money totally wasted. There is no threat from Russia or anywhere else to the UK, not in terms of ordinary warfare. The threats are all from the migration invasion or are from within the society— the demographic changes, the exploitative finance-capitalism tearing society apart, and the collapsing fake “democratic” political system.

Britain should not be getting involved in Ukraine, the Middle East, or the Indian Ocean. It is pathetic, anyway, now that our Empire is long-gone, given away by the LabCon traitors now all too ready to wave the flag around to “support” the thuggish and corrupt regime Ukraine, or the appalling Israeli state.

Indicates low enthusiasm for all existing parties. Translates to a Commons with about 284 Reform UK MPs (about 42 short of an overall majority), 93 Cons (weak official Opposition unless they make common cause with Reform, either coalition or other arrangement); Greens 68, LibDems 68, Lab 62, SNP 45 [etc].

That would probably be good for social nationalism. A Reform or Reform/Con government would be a disaster but, as Lenin said “worse will be better“…

Once again, as in all polling for a long time, Starmer would lose his seat on those figures, as would any Labour MP in Makerfield (probably including Burnham, if he wins the upcoming by-election).

Very true, but that is where the vast bulk of the population is.

There may be oblique or indirect ways for people, whether as groups or as individuals (“lone wolves”), to sabotage and rebel.

Again, very true, but “prepping” in the UK is not the same, nor can it be, as prepping in the USA, Canada, Russia etc.

See also:

https://ianrobertmillard.org/category/prepping

See also:

Leaving aside the schools issue, one thing is clear: Labourite drone and careerist Bridget Phillipson knows little or no history, despite her mixed history/languages degree from Oxford.

The Gestapo did not march “hundreds of thousands” (of any types) anywhere. I presume that the idiotic woman is confusing or conflating the Gestapo with the S.S.

The Gestapo was a quite small organization, largely made up of former detectives from the Kripo (criminal police). Its job was to track down spies and saboteurs etc, which it did mainly by sifting through denunciations sent in by citizens.

In fact, 95% of the work of the Gestapo was to examine, then dismiss denunciations made by people either mistakenly or maliciously. There were usually only a few Gestapo officers in even quite sizeable towns.

The Gestapo operated almost invariably in civilian clothes, and did not march columns of prisoners anywhere.

Disappointing but certainly not surprising, these days, to find such ignorance in a woman who not only read History (period studied not known to me), but also is now Secretary of State for Education…

Incidentally, the only non-political jobs that woman ever had prior to getting in on the old MP racket were 2 years as an office worker at her local council, then for about 2 years as manager of a charity founded by her own mother: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridget_Phillipson.

Another small settlement (500 inhabitants before the war, and now probably few, certainly not more than 100).

Russia needs a gamechanger. Urgently.

[“Starmer’s turning the UK into an authoritarian dictatorship, where people are too scared to speak out

Its planned social media ban is being sold as child protection. Look closer and it affects every adult too.

To keep under-16s off X, TikTok, YouTube and the rest, everyone has to prove they’re over 16. That means tying your ID to your accounts.

We’ve seen where this leads.

Under the existing Online Safety Act, sites like Imgur and several adult platforms simply blocked all UK users rather than handle the verification.

Civil liberties groups like the Open Rights Group are already warning about who holds that data and how it’s protected.

Set that against a country with a track record of arresting people over online posts, and the worry writes itself.

When your name is attached to everything you say, you start watching what you say.

It’s the oldest trick in the authoritarian playbook, the same instinct that kept people quiet under every communist regime of the last century.

Starmer calls it protecting children. Funny how the protection always seems to involve knowing exactly who said what.

And the people who do speak out and stand up, like Tommy Robinson? He was arrested under the Terrorism Act so police could seize his devices and see who he’s been communicating with.

The UK is slipping into tyranny, and the voices that can speak out will soon be silenced.“]

You have to bear in mind, also, that those tested were tested after having been prisoners for some time, on restricted diets and, in some cases (Streicher, in particular) subject to ill-treatment amounting to torture at the hands of Jews in American uniform.

I was tested in the 1980s at 156 or 155 (I forget, but think the former), but of course that was about 40 years ago. In any case, IQ is only one factor of importance. “EQ” is also very significant in terms of how the individual functions in society, for example.

Not as straightforward as often thought. Marilyn Monroe was (apparently) on or above the IQ level of Einstein. In the old phrase, “it makes one think“…

“Antifascist”/”antiracist” idiots usually do try the old “racists are knuckledraggers” (etc) line; a couple even tried to characterize me that way on Twitter, many years ago. Not worth discussing; certainly, there is no need for anyone on “our” side of the “argument” to self-validate or self-justify.

Get them out or get them gone. Whatever it takes.

There are several ethno-cultural “communities” in the UK that should be removed (and read that however you like), not just one.

Interesting point, and probably correct.

Like a box of Soviet chocolates: different shapes externally, but all with the same filling.

Those people (and those behind them) would have us at war, and entirely unnecessarily, and hugely devastatingly, with Russia. Healey even mentioned it in that speech (“…war with Russia within 5 years“…).

Russia has 6,000-7,000 nuclear weapons of various types, including massive missiles, some of which cannot be intercepted en route. Do those willing to fight Russia (and why? To support the corrupt, shambolic, and brutal Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev?) really want to risk these islands becoming a charred and radioactive wasteland?

No thank you.

Britain should leave NATO, cultivate better relations with Russia, take Russian oil and gas at cost price (I think that easily achievable in the right circumstances) and, in Russia, find a ready and huge market for British goods and services, including our people’s great overall skill-set.

Carns may well climb higher. Exceptional. However, from what I have seen and heard so far, possibly (and, in view of his support for Jo Cox and her activity, probably) ideologically unsound.

I am all in favour of the UK being, in Carns’ own words, “able to defend itself“, but that must be distinguished from fomenting entirely unnecessary wars which are likely to entirely destroy this country and its people.

I can see Carns being appealing to many voters, though.

Carns’ speech is wrong in its characterization of the Attlee government of the mid/late 1940s. That excellent historian, Correlli Barnett [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlli_Barnett] made the point in his several books that the UK tried to do three things after 1945 (retain a global military presence, re-tool British industry and commerce, establish or improve the Welfare State), but only had the wherewithal to do two of those properly, and thus did all three but inadequately.

Having said that, Carns made a pretty good speech there, objectively.

See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Carns

I have seen, however, from Carns’ tweets and interviews on domestic matters, that he is very weak in areas outside his core comfort-zone of defence etc.

I am generally opposed to the death penalty, but there are exceptions. This is one such exception.

Only social nationalism can save this country now.

At the end of the day, Andy Burnham is really just another Labourite drone, with little or really nothing new to say, let alone do.

What a nice idea.

Israel, as a state, as a society, is no worse than most of the Arab/Muslim states in the region, in overall terms —indeed, in some respects better— but is the hub of worldwide Jewish power and influence. That is why I oppose it.

[“Iran has managed to survive the attacks and even bring Washington to its knees, writes the Ynet portal.

Iran withstood serious attacks and, relying on its remaining strength, managed to bring the United States to its knees,” the portal states.

“The problem lies with the United States. They have shown their weakness: their word is no longer their word, their power is no longer power, and their blockade is no longer a blockade.”

“These were supposed to be the best days of the United States as a world power,” but “the grand names of operations against Iran – the American ‘Epic Rage’ and the Israeli ‘Roaring Lion’ – have been shattered to pieces,” it adds.

According to Ynet, Israel has not seen such a consensus in society for a long time, between the left and the far right, that the American-Iranian agreement, expected to be signed on June 19, is a “strategic defeat” for Israel and a “failure” for the United States and moderate Sunni states in the region.

“Trump is determined to reach an agreement. Hardly any leader of a great power has ever shown such zeal, which is a sign of weakness,” Ynet believes, adding that even “the demonstration of power now boils down to Trump’s AI-generated videos portraying himself as a global superman.

“It’s hard to believe, but that’s exactly how it is: never before has such a powerful state shown such a terrifying weakness towards a country that was considered to have suffered a severe defeat,” the portal emphasizes.“]

Those who live will see“…

[“Zelensky keeps bragging online while frontline troubles mounting for Ukrainian army Fresh off the G7 summit, Zelensky once again tried to rattle President Putin and Russia with threats of a “harsh winter,” projecting an image that NATO’s latest tech upgrades had given him the strategic upper hand. But for all the polished optics flooding Ukrainian and Western media, the reality on the ground tells a very different story.“]

Late music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gara_Garayev; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Beauties_(ballet)]

Diary Blog, 15 June 2026

Morning music

[The Angel of the North]
[The Wicker Man (1973)]

A stray thought out of season

I was just thinking about admirable scenes from films. One which shows a decision made by someone of real integrity is when “The Jackal”, played in the original film by Edward Fox (ignore the remakes), is told that the French security services have discovered his identity and the nature of his mission— “The Jackal is blown; repeat, the Jackal is blown“, and he therefore has the possibility of abandoning his mission and getting out, as well as keeping the half of his fee which has already been paid upfront. His car reaches a fork in the road on the Cote d’Azur. A signpost points left to Paris, right to Italy. After a momentary hesitation, he guns the engine and drives into France, to the fulfilment of his mission, despite the almost suicidal risk. That is integrity. Class.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Jackal_(film)#Plot

Tweets seen

[“Cornell student Austin Franco was doxxed by Jewish business leaders after explaining that he “didn’t want to work for a Jew,” claiming his experiences with Jews were not “pleasant,” after a NYC startup he had applied to reached out to him three times.

After one of the cofounders, Gabe Einhorn, posted Franco’s reply with his last name blocked out, Franco was quickly identified.

Einhorn said he did not “want to ruin his life,” but wanted to “raise awareness” of antisemitism.

Franco, in a now-deleted post, said that in his personal and professional experiences, Jews were tribalistic and vengeful, and tended to ruin and bully others who opposed them.

Franco stated, “I am sure that if you indicated you didn’t want to work for someone who was White or Christian this would not have blown up…”

Franco claimed that the actions by Einhorn and the Jewish community, posting his reply, doxxing him, and then trying to investigate and uproot his personal life, vindicated his concerns that Jews do not work with others politely.“]

Never give in. Never “apologise” to them (they treat it as victory over you and will trample you all the more). Never delete honest and accurate material.

“Kiev”, not “Kyiv” (and certainly not the BBC’s “Keeev“).

In the Middle East, the die is cast.

I understood the paradox long ago: the USA has more military-destructive power than any empire or state in history, and can destroy any force, or whole country, designated as an enemy, yet cannot necessarily use that force without itself suffering mortal injury; also, it has not the ideological will to impose an imperium (not only military-political authority but also a continuing “way of life”) in the way done by the great empires of the past— Hellenic, Roman, Mughal, French, British, Russian/Soviet etc.

The USA should really make the (Israeli) Jews do what the USA requires, by cutting off arms and money, but of course the Israeli/Jewish element is embedded very strongly in Congress, as well as in the American mass media, influential think tanks, publishing, academia etc, as well as, obviously, business and finance.

[$$$ from US taxpayers to Israel, leading to corrupt payments of $$$ from Israel to American legislators. The Americans are therefore paying Israel to corrupt the Americans’ own supposed representatives…].

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15897997/unit-government-police-MI6-agent-racial-tensions.html

I admit that, at first, I discounted the various tweets seen a few days ago, which tweets were saying that the fake “communitarian” gobbledegook put out notionally by the family of the murdered boy, Henry Nowak, was in fact forced on that family by the police or others (“the authorities”), but it seems that I was wrong.

I had thought that the typical System language of that family’s communique was simply because some police or “community relations” drone had helped them express their thoughts. As all too often, I was too kind. Seems that the whole thing was a “nudge” unit operation.

It will be recalled that a “high-flying” Civil Service Jew set up the Downing Street “nudge” operation about a decade or so ago, and on the orders of David Cameron-Levita and George Osborne.

Very sinister.

Monkeyworld UK.

[“Online safety” laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children.

You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone’s age without forcing them to prove who they are.

“Child safety” is the cheese in the mousetrap.

Laws sold under the banner of “child protection” constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target.

And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will.

Today it is pornography, social media and “harmful content”. Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at all—each incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing.

It’s no accident that the exact same “online safety” agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcome—a verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet.

Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure.

They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internet—orchestrated from the supranational level by people you never elected—where access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience.

The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible.

Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not.

Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure.

But the gate only closes if people accept “online safety” laws at face value”]

Starmer-stein and his Cabinet are tyrants. Historically, tyrants have often had to be removed by direct popular action.

She is right.

Does Andrew Neil really believe this has anything at all to do with “protecting children”? If so, he is less perspicacious than I had thought.

Many will have been headed to the UK; many more just like them are still en route. Backward migrant-invaders.

That was just one of them. Hundreds of thousands arrive every year now. To remove or eliminate them will be a Herculean and apocalyptic task.

I know what should happen, but cannot express it, not in our supposedly “free” country…

Question to Google AI about how the “under-16s” social media ban will affect adults in the UK

how will the new under-16 social media ban affect those above the age of 18?

The new under-16 social media ban will primarily affect adults by requiring them to undergo strict age-verification checks, such as uploading government IDs or submitting to facial age-estimation scans, to access their own accounts. Because the law forces tech companies to police the age limit under threat of massive fines, platforms must prove all active users are old enough to be there. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Mandatory Age Checks

Adults will no longer be able to simply check a box to state they are over 18. Platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X are rolling out Highly Effective Age Assurance (HEAA) measures. To log in or keep an active account, adults must use methods like facial analysis scanning, uploading passports or driving licences, or verifying through a bank account. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Increased Privacy and Data Concerns [1]

Civil liberties groups and digital experts note that this creates a system where adults must continuously hand over sensitive personal data to big tech firms. This has sparked criticism that the ban functions as a “digital ID by the back door,” raising prominent concerns about how securely adult data will be stored, monitored, and protected. [1, 2]

[from Google AI]

Police state, by any other name…

Talking point

https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/makerfield-and-the-politics-of-pressure

More tweets seen

[“IMPORTANT :

There seems to be some individuals under the illusion that Remigration won’t result in mass violence on the streets. This is extremely naive and shows lack of understanding in the situation.

Let’s be conservative and say we have 20 million foreigners in Britain – do you think these people will leave just because you asked nicely?

The idea of “friendly Remigration” is childish and shows that people aren’t ready for what’s coming.

I worked with a Sudanese fella before – he watched his entire family get murdered in front of him in the civil war. Do you think he’ll go home just because you asked nicely?

What about the radical Islamists who are here soley to take over? Will they abandon their beliefs because you want them to?

What about the communists who support our replacement, will they change their minds because you promised to do it nicely?

Remigration will cause violence in the streets and many will die on both sides.

This is not a game.

The NRP understands this which is why we are a militant based party, we understand the sacrifices and the suffering that lay ahead of us.

There’s a whole world of suffering coming our way. It’s time to grow up and accept it.

We need a radical government to do radical actions.“]

I believe that the “NRP” is the National Rebirth Party, led by a former soldier called Alek Yerbury:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk

[“Journalists are absolute scum. They are vicious in punishing people who dare to speak out about the Great Replacement. They will literally try to destroy your life.

It doesn’t matter if you are a good person, honest, generous, kind, etc. Nothing matters but that you defied the system.

In extreme cases, they will plaster your face over the front page of their newspaper so that everyone will see you as a villain.

I was 33 when they did this to me. They have now done it to a 19 year-old.

Support Angloid.”]

Tell me about it!

As I have noted before, this is not a “debate”, it is a war, even if at present mainly a “cold war”.

Late tweets seen

George Foulkes, a horrible, corrupt, and utterly useless old bastard, a freeloader and fraudster who, in any decent society, would be, at very least, digging canals or something. The whole quite long tweet is worth reading.

Labour. It has outlived its usefulness, just like the equally-fake “Conservative” Party.

I shall be interested to see what the charge will be. On the face of it, looking at what is already in the public domain, the evidence might be sufficient to ground an attempted murder charge but will probably, in the end, be a lesser charge. Tweets seen are suggesting GBH.

All the “protect children“, “stop terrorism” rubbish pumped out by Labour Friends of Israel puppets such as Starmer-stein, Yvette Cooper, Jess Phillips etc was always a pack of lies, of course, just a way to bring in a total police state by the back door.

Deportations are one way. There are others.

[“This is possibly the worst crime in modern history.
Two men “adopted” a baby.

“A post mortem examination identified more than 30 external bruises, as well as internal bruising to his mouth and throat, internal bruising to his anus, bowel and bladder, lacerations to his anorectum, and a perforated bowel.”

“One medical expert gave evidence that a bruise on the baby’s bottom appeared to be a human bite mark.”

Think what this poor baby went through. The men who did this should be put to death.

Men should not be able to buy babies. I know that this will cause some anguish to good men who have good intentions, but it’s necessary to prevent this happening. This cannot happen again.“]

Poor child. What an appalling crime; in fact, an appalling series of crimes. Men generally, particularly male couples in some kind of performative fake “marriage” cosplay, should not be allowed to adopt children; same goes for most lesbian couples, incidentally.

As for the defendants in that case, it is too good for them really, but we must keep our hands clean, so a quick and clean execution by firing squad would be my order, were I in a position to make the decision. Just expunge them from society.

Pseudo-“Conservative” Fraser Nelson, always ready to support anything that deprives British people of a decent future, or that cheats them out of a decent life today. Of course, he is pro-Jewish lobby, pro-Israel, pro-globalism etc…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Nelson

[Shishkin, Bee Families in the Forest]