We are very sad to announce that Franco Tizzano, a founding member, dear friend and colleague to us all, died peacefully at home yesterday. He was a class act & a true gentleman. He will be missed by us all. We send our condolences to his wife Manthiar and their daughter Tosca. pic.twitter.com/GHf7Y2KBQ4
I was once slightly acquainted with the deceased. I had a few short conversations with him when we were both law degree and Bar Finals students (in the then terminology). I also encountered him a couple of times when I returned from the USA in 1993 and was doing my “second six” months of pupillage, when the fledgling barrister can earn a little money by appearing in court.
I recall that we happened to meet at Thames Mags not long after I had shaken the dust of New Jersey and New York off my shoes. I was doing the first appearance of a Jamaican accused of smuggling cocaine dissolved in rum.
[the not very beautiful Thames Magistrates’ Court, East London]
Tizzano was some years younger than me but was ahead of me at the Bar, I having spent a few years or part-years in the USA.
I recall that, on first meeting in 1984, Tizzano had explained that he came from Naples but that (if memory serves) he had been at an English boarding school. I understand that his father was a judge in Naples.
I remember that I remarked that “Naples is the warm heart of the world“, according to Shelley, to which Tizzano retorted, “was he mad?“!
Tizzano was a rather serious young man, in the grave Italian way. Someone with a certain dignified presence. Jet-black hair and a black moustache. I see that, in later life, that was complemented by a beard.
I understand that he had a busy criminal practice in later years: I would sometimes see his name in newspaper crime reports, though I think that the last time I saw Tizzano in person was in 1993 or 1994.
A reminder that we are all on Earth for a limited time, and must do what we can while we are here.
Tweets seen
UK government backs Israelโs bombardment of Gaza https://t.co/Wcw4XfQdLg The UK government is totally under the control of Israel. including the House of Lords .
— james macfarlane (@hamishmacfarlan) May 20, 2021
Talk about adding insult to injury! James Cleverly, proud possessor of a degree in “Hospitality Management” from the University of West London.
BBC โfell short of high standards of integrity and transparency" over Martin Bashir's interview with Diana, Princess of Wales, inquiry sayshttps://t.co/lzN4yNZKR8
I broke this story with my colleague @NicholasHellen on 4th October, setting in place a chain of events that have resulted in this being brought to light after 25 years: https://t.co/2qPOVGJ90O
What is not generally known about Bashir is that, in 2018, he stalked persecuted singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz. That was around the time that Alison Chabloz was convicted of posting her songs online, after a lengthy and very morally-dubious campaign (both overt and covert) by Jewish Zionists of the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”.
Bashir stalked both Alison and her aged parents, with whom she was staying at the time. Bashir travelled to the small village, in the Peak District of Derbyshire, where they lived, and after failing to be granted an interview with anyone, hung around the village and the house itself. He was seen trying to hide in the garden of the house, standing in flower beds etc. He even peered through firmly-closed windows.
Bashir is not the only very sleazy person to have effectively headed the BBC’s virtually God-free religious output. There have been some very dubious characters in the past too.
Bashir followed the now-usual BBC “religious” agenda: sanctify Jewish things, normalize Muslim things, ignore or twist anything Christian.
As for Alison Chabloz, at time and date of writing she is still in prison (having been sentenced on 31 March 2021) for having made some more or less true remarks about Jews on an internet “radio” broadcast. If not released earlier, she will be released next week, having by then served about 8 weeks (half of her 18-week sentence minus 4 days).
[Alison Chabloz]
Other tweets seen
The real education scandal is that white British boys are bottom of the schooling scrapheap, but of course you can rely on the BBC to withhold the information & twist the truth.#DefundTheBBCpic.twitter.com/Cxs5Bb0VR1
1/4 'Douglas Murray @douglaskmurray says he has no idea whether I am right or wrong about whether the government has acted correctly over the coronavirus. Why on earth not?…. 'https://t.co/3JTUusVFjb via @spectator
2/4 '….I have not endured having a hundred buckets of slime tipped over my head over the past few weeks to provide a sort of sporting spectacle for Douglas [Murray] @douglaskmurray or anyone else to enjoy…. https://t.co/3JTUusVFjb via @spectator
3/4 'I do not argue for the sake of it. I loathe the abuse and the solitude as much as anyone might expect me to. I see my country in danger of grave and lasting threats to its freedom and its prosperity.' https://t.co/3JTUusVFjb via @spectator
4/4 'I fear a future of over-mighty officials & police displaying the insolence of office, a dead political consensus, confiscatory tax, shrivelled savings & pensions, lower wages & standards of living, & diminished hopes for the young.'https://t.co/3JTUusVFjb via @spectator
I'll stick to what I like, @stephen96947853, whoever you are . I took up the case against the Covid panic pretty much alone and fought it for more than a year. One of the main reasons I failed was the adherence of lizardist and 5G cranks to what was otherwise a good cause https://t.co/T7BqcME1zq
Hitchens overrates his influence (and the extent to which his opposition to the “panicdemic” was tainted by association). The anti-lockdown and anti-shutdown side lost the argument with the public not because “lizardist” and other people also opposed the shutdown, and not because the opponents of “lockdown” were mistaken, but because the bulk of the British people have become spineless serfs of the “woke” police state. That applies even more to the retirement-age Middle Englanders than it does to the young and middle-aged.
The “lockdown” shutdown has also been promoted by massive propaganda campaigns, utilizing whipped-up and unnecessary fear as a driver.
Then there is the fact of the huge amount of public money thrown at the “furloughed” employees and also some businesses. Hush money?
The fact is that only 1 in a thousand UK residents has been killed (even on doubtful statistics) by the Covid-19 virus. Yet the campaign continues. In the rural, semi-rural and semi-suburban part of Southern England where I live, there are over 180,000 inhabitants (in a rather large and dispersed population and area). In the past month, there have been 8 deaths of people who have been tested and confirmed as having this virus, and who died within 28 days of testing (even if later killed in road accidents).
Still, even on the face of the absurd statistics, look at the proportion! Only 8 out of 180,000+…
About 1 out of every 22,500 local residents.
The facemask nonsense also continues, with a push now to continue it indefinitely, despite the fact that the medical effect is minimal. There again, the real reason the System wants facemasks has nothing to do with any virus.
"Conspiracy Theories/Theorist" is a pejorative term riddled with prejudice for information the user of term knows nothing about and never will because they've prejudged it to be false.
The experiment in mass psychology and propaganda turns the screw tighter…
Israel has highest poverty rate in the developed world, OECD report shows – Haaretz | Israel news, COVID vaccine data, the Middle East and the Jewish World – https://t.co/M8lVDdaAvlhttps://t.co/XbrYIeac3A
What a surprise… no wonder most Jews in the UK do not want to F.O. and go there to live…
The MSM ( BBC in this case) is complaining about abuse. I responded to one it's employees; condemning the abuse, but also to offer a reason why there's a massive increase in anti-MSM sentiment. He did take time out to respond. An interesting discourse …https://t.co/RdIGn7ofJg
1. Hi Mike. No, abuse is neither justified nor acceptable. What is happening, however, is that the people are getting increasingly fed up with the MSM's cradle to grave Establishment propaganda, including the BBC's contribution to that since it was created in 1922. Huge numbers
3. promulgators to patronisingly call people "conspiracy theorists", a term which is as pejorative as it is immature.
So don't be surprised if you see an increasing level of complaints and criticism towards the MSM, which it rightly deserves. Unfortunately a small minority will
5. questioning that narrative are being increasingly smeared and persecuted, not just by the MSM shouting "Conspiracy Theorist!" at them, but by Social Media actively limiting their reach using shadow banning, ghost deleting algorithms, deplatforming, etc. We know the BBC has
2. incredulous claim that I'm encouraging abuse only serves to back up that perception. In a free society people should be able to freely protest, criticise and complain ( but NOT mount abuse ) about anything they feel is wrong. The MSM has for centuries been an Establishment
2. "Conspiracy Theorist!" which in turn and as designed, encourages soe ordinary people to use the same pejoratives against those challenging the Establishment's narrative. "grossly oversimplified" ? Well, as someone au fait with geopolitical history, I could write a whole
4. governments are the entities indulging in "awful anti-free speech behaviour". Behaviour which is getting deliberately worse as more and more are speaking out.
I'm just hoping for you and others within the MSM bubble could at least try and see things from the POV of those of
2. term "Conspiracy Theorist!" liberally, which is severely damaging her narrative. The MSM, Wikipedia, etc is pebble dashed with the term in fact. By all means challenge what you consider to be false hoods, or what you are told are falsehoods by Establishment sources, but
Very well said Methi. More people need to speak up. Itโs scary how bad are media has become. They will regret this when our freedoms are never returned because they helped support this medical tyranny.
A fairly interesting thread seen on Twitter. The BBC drone was typical of the type, all reasonable and even-handed on the surface but, when challenged, basically a supporter of System dictatorship. Conflates “free speech” and “regulation” thereof. “We need to regulate free speech so that we can have free speech” etc.
cf. “we have to impose a police state around the virus so that we can live freely with the virus“, and so on.
Incidentally, the aforesaid BBC drone is not even British. American: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Wendling. Time was when BBC people were all British, except for administrative staff overseas.
Here is a tweet from one of his colleagues:
I wrote for The Sunday Times News Review about my first year as the BBCโs Specialist disinformation reporter.
I have tried to meet and interview the people impacted by, falling for and spreading online conspiracies. Hereโs what itโs taught me! https://t.co/15qTrSaJJE
People like that, assuming for the sake of argument (and initial courtesy) that they are honest, should really look at the propaganda being spewed out 24/7 by the msm. Example? https://ianrobertmillard.org/2018/12/10/tv-ads-and-soaps-are-the-propaganda-preferred-by-the-system-in-the-uk/. They might even start to take a properly sceptical look at the “holocaust” farrago, with its thousands of proven fakeries and hoaxes (not least the “gas chambers” narrative).
In reality, such BBC and other “salarypeople” are closer in behaviour to propagandists than to traditional truth-seeking journalists. Look at this, from the same person, and published on the BBC’s own website: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-54738471.
Pretty similar to the sort of piece that was published in Soviet newspapers of, say, the early 1980s, or 1970s. Smug, hectoring, one-sided, biased.
Meanwhile, “in other news”
…it seems that it has come as a shock to many people that a crazed butch lesbian runs “a toxic workplace“…quelle surprise…
Ellen DeGeneres has faced a steep ratings decline, losing more than a million viewers since September, after reports of a toxic workplace at her show. It is a startling setback for one of daytime televisionโs most successful franchises. https://t.co/01cmSorOgU
At last! Caroline Jones in the Daily Mail points out the major health dangers of the absurd and pointless wrenching forward of clocks each Spring. pic.twitter.com/ee3WDcq9FJ
— ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐น (@scotbot) March 22, 2021
I've spent the last month producing a film about lockdowns. Why and how they were implemented, and whether we will see them again post-COVID, also featured in today's @TheSun.
…and the World Economic Forum, Financial Times etc have said, openly, publicly, that the “pandemic”/”panicdemic” is “a great opportunity“. They also specified “for what?”…the Great Reset.
They are preparing the ground for the next 33 years, to start next year in 2022.
Chief Constable of the joke police force that has been persecuting the satirical singer Alison Chabloz for years, egged on by a dimwit Labour Party Sikh who is the Police and Crime Commissioner for the county. Dim and also suborned. You could hardly have a more “peaceful protest” than singing songs! Even if (((they))) do not like them!
Derbyshire Police force was also one of the worst bullying forces during the initial panic of the “panicdemic”.
Look carefully and you can see the hatches through which the Polaris missiles would have been launched. The Ship's Company referred to themselves as 'The Greater Moscow Redevelopment Corporation', a joke I enjoyed even more when, a few years later, I lived in Moscow. https://t.co/NtsFqO9qDx
When I was first in Moscow, in 1993, I had a German map which was very easy to use because it had the landmarks and landmark buildings in 3-D picture form. Trouble was, the map had been printed in about 1988, and since then many of the streets had changed names. I knew that in outline, but not in detail. My enquiries of passers-by were therefore confusing to both parties.
Prospekt Kalinina had become Novi Arbat, the Lenin Hills were now (again, as before Lenin’s death) the Sparrow Hills, and so on. Various “landmarks”, such as statues and large busts of Soviet notables, were gone, sometimes without trace, sometimes having left behind evidence of recent removal, such as the bust of Kalinin on the former Prospekt Kalinina, ripped off its massive marble or polished granite plinth, the metal stalk that had secured it still sticking up from the stone.
When I returned to Moscow on a brief business trip in 2007, even more had changed. The huge, circular, and pleasantly dilapidated, swimming pool “Moskva”, near Metro station Kropotkinskaya, which in 1993 I had shared every morning with only a couple of small groups of elderly lady swimmers wearing plastic caps (the pool could supposedly accommodate 10,000 swimmers), had had a cathedral built upon it and, in other neighbourhoods, ugly new buildings were everywhere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moskva_Pool
[Swimming pool “Moskva”, c.1980]
No @mklogue. My time in the USSR, later Russia, was by turns exhausting, educational, thrilling, dispiriting, exhilarating and hard on my family. I was never in any danger of romanticising it. But I am amazed at the (easily-cured) ignorance of it at high levels in the UK. https://t.co/bEvFenxXrN
As seen on almost every past blog post recently, Twitter censorship is now very evident; many embedded tweets just removed, leaving blank spaces. “The Great Reset”…
Some music by Atterberg, a Swedish composer all but unknown to the public of Britain, and in his native Sweden very much sidelined after 1945 because of his cultural and spiritual ties to the Reich.
I managed it without difficulty, though I know that my lung capacity must be a fraction of what it was 20-40 years ago when I could —and did— swim a mile, or a couple of miles, every couple of days, and had been known to swim several miles of open sea and then haul myself up several feet onto the deck of a motor yacht (without a ladder— very awkward and slippery, but it had to be done).
Tweets seen
Another brilliant article from the Unz Review. In-depth look at, and explanation of, the cancelling of white men from corporate advertising. Be sure to follow the link to the second half as well.#WhiteGeNocide#frankfurtschoolhttps://t.co/jbwZV4Q97X
When I hear them whine 'cultural appropriation', I think of the concepts, language & technology they use to do so. The clothes they wear, sports they play, the farms that feed them, medicines that keep them healthy. And the fact they don't eat each other.https://t.co/FDPNiDCEXb
The Black and White Minstrel Show and similar is “cultural appropriation”, apparently (despite the fact that “blacking up” was invented by non-blacks), but black actors and actresses can play white people from history, such as (absurdly) Ann Boleyn!
If you backed the second lockdown despite all the evidence that it would trash the economy & cost more lives than it saves, then DON'T YOU DARE complain about cuts to foreign aid, no pay rises, millions of lost jobs, huge debt & the inevitable future tax rises.
This is what I was talking about. Why should a decision of this magnitude be โ50:50โ. If weโre going to have this ridiculous system there should be transparent, objective criteria to determine which regions enter which Tiers. There shouldnโt be any debate about it. https://t.co/cvEKjOHfHo
โGovernment insiders said it is possible none of England will be put into the less restrictive Tier 1.โ And then Johnson can claim that he kept his promise to end lockdown on December 2nd, technically. https://t.co/Nngjvbwna5
The faltering of the wave in late October and early November was not just a pause but a peak. Hospital admissions appear to have peaked on 11 November and began to fall, implying a peak of infections in late October, well before lockdown began. https://t.co/Ii9duwBYKv
Politicians everywhere are not very bright, and are afraid of real responsibility. They also hate admitting mistakes. That's why. https://t.co/jY2f3i2ZQu
Peter Hitchens sees (surely correctly) the incompetence of governments, but fails to see the interpenetrating conspiracy (or “consensus” if you prefer) within and behind governments: Bilderberg, WEF, the Coudenhove Kalergi Plan, the “Great Reset”, the “Great Replacement”, “ZOG”, “NWO”, etc…
The Danish Study did shred the case for masks, @silversynergy . So much so that @nntaleb, the well known muzzle zealot, is now calling for it to be retracted. Now, he wouldn't do that if it *supported* the case for masks, would he? https://t.co/xsBLt8rmvQ
@willadamslsd Do you regard it as โnormalโ to go around wearing a pointless nappy over the lower half of your face, for fear of being fined ยฃ6,400? Takes all sorts. https://t.co/HbncScdG47
If you're ill @michaelberry, sweetie, do you normally need a full-page newspaper advertisment to get you to realise it? And how many illnesses have you had which the government actively urged you have tested and recorded by them? https://t.co/tSV3fqdx8D
Here we go again, the first epidemic in history which the government has to search for. The first disease where they have to advertise for actual patients. pic.twitter.com/CnIwPMO1Ob
Is this why the BBC refused to answer my question about QT's audience last week? : Question Time ratings plummet to all-time low in 'huge embarrassment' for BBC https://t.co/D6fConvVwD
I happened to see a trailer for a game show called Pointless Celebrities. The main “pointless celebrity” shown? Owen Jones! Ha ha! Am punkt! I presume that that episode was from some years ago. Does Owen Jones still count as a “celebrity”? Maybe; after all, I have no idea who most of the contemporary “celebrities” even are.
Tweets seen
When the new Covid tiers are announced this morning, don't be *grateful* if your area is in Tier 2 or even – dare to dream – Tier 1.
Don't be grateful for being given back freedoms that should never have been taken away in the first place.
To see how debased our cultural elites have become, consider that Carole Cadwalladr was given the Orwell Prize for what have now been shown to be preposterous fantasies, simply because she was telling Europhile hardliners what they wanted to hear. https://t.co/82oJPqlYI6
She may have got a prize worth a couple of thousand pounds, but now has to pay over ยฃ60,000 in costs, as well as (presumably) her own; also, to add to the merriment, the Guardian is sacking staff and reducing pay, so the future looks bleak for its scribblers.
Before further punishing pubs and restaurants how about improving infection control in hospitals? Over 15% of Covid hospital โadmissionsโ are given the virus after being admitted for another condition.
Foreign aid is a rotten borough, just as quite a lot of the charity sector is a rotten borough. As many have said, the beneficiaries of foreign aid, often, are those who work in the sector (especially the “senior” bods), corrupt officials and politicians in the receiving country, and large Western companies, law firms etc. I saw some of that myself in respect of the former Soviet Union in the 1990s.
Charities are similar. Look at organizations such as Oxfam and Save the Children. I think that the latter was where Brendan Cox, the sex pest husband of assassinated MP Jo Cox was second in command, and had a salary of something like ยฃ200,000 a year. Someone with virtually no credible academic or other background. I seem to recall that the CEO was paid even more, around ยฃ400,000 a year. Is this what people in the UK, often poor, give their pennies for? I think not. Also, much UK government money is funnelled through such bloated organizations.
Just last week, I saw that the head of Barnardo’s, a non-white now, has launched a basically anti-British crusade against “racism” etc, using Barnardo’s funds. People do not give their pennies or leave legacy monies so that it can be wasted on trash of that sort.
Anything given to foreign aid etc via government, charities etc, is likely to be wasted. When I spent a few months in Egypt in 1998, a month of that was in the Berber oasis of Siwa: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siwa_Oasis
I often saw bags of flour on sale in the market, which bags and sacks were marked with the English words “A gift from the Danish people“! I do not imagine that Siwa received such food as aid; it is a rather prosperous place by Egyptian standards. The sacks may have come from beyond the Sahara, from Chad or elsewhere.
The Rishi Sunak statement etc
I start from the premise that the lockdown/shutdown was unnecessary, as is the facemask nonsense etc. It has done tremendous damage to the UK. Not “the virus”, but Government measures in reaction.
Having said that, “we are where we are”, in the irritating and smug phrase so beloved of “our” politicians.
Huge monies have been spent and largely wasted this year. The only saving grace is that, interest rates being very low internationally, the UK can borrow at almost no cost. That should be done to a even greater extent than at present, while the chance is there.
The devil, though, is in the detail. The monies borrowed must be used as investment for the future: well thought-out infrastructure spending, meaning railways and roads (but not without thought), as well as proper urban planning, and upgrading of the population, including radical reform of the entire educational structure.
I cannot see the point in immediate tax rises or spending cuts, both of which tend to have a depressive effect on economic resurgence.
The first thing to do, though, is to end the “lockdown” nonsense, the “tiers” of shutdown nonsense, the facemask nonsense etc. Without opening up the country again, any other measures to stimulate the economy will be a complete waste of time and effort.
A Government of clowns headed by a part-Jew public entertainer whose jokes are now falling flat. What could go wrong?
Do I blame “Boris”? Yes, but not entirely. I also blame the MPs (both fake “Conservative” Party and equally-fake “Labour” Party). I also blame the 90,000 or so Conservative Party pensioners (almost all were pensioners) who decided to vote for “Boris” as Conservative Party leader last year. I also blame the mass media, who have pandered to the am-dram sub-Churchillian fantasies of Boris-idiot for 20 years, puffing him to the public as a “Prime Minister in Waiting”, despite his blatantly obvious unfitness.
Finally, I also blame the great but often sadly moronic British public, who have preferred, for decades, to worry about the latest news re. football, rugby, cricket, or whatever may be happening in Emmerdale or “Coronation Strasse”, rather than anything to do with the future of the UK, of Europe, of our race and culture etc.
Unless the Government can publish very clear criteria for why the Tier 3 areas have been placed into that top tier I think this is going to become a political disaster for Boris.
Political disaster maybe, but what can the British people do, when the political system is carved up between a couple of System parties with, at root, very similar policies. That’s Boris-idiot’s lifebelt, that Labour would do exactly what he is doing, or more of the same.
We live in an elected dictatorship. Not just the Conservative Party but also the other party, Labour (or, if you look wider, LibDems and SNP as well).
The authoritarianism at work today is truly appalling. But is it necessary and proportionate to the threat from this disease?
Don't get the politics behind this. Tory MPs are fanning out to praise Sunak's statement, and talk up what he's going to do for their areas. Where do they think these 2.6 million job losses are coming from. And what are they going to say when their words are thrown back at them.
The Globalists have the MSM and the government's say shit that's DELIBERATELY full of emotional blackmail. Guilt tripping. Shaming. It's weaponized applied behavioural psychology and masd propoganda upon yhe unsuspecting respective populations of each country thats infiltrated.
They manifest like crazy. ๐๏ธ One of the most immediately suggested symbols on social media platforms. The more it's symbolised. The closer into reality it becomes. Social media platforms deliberately make it one of the most convenient and suggested symbol to be used whilst typing
The BBC complaints system is a sort of sponge @BBCnewspr, whose outer layer is run by Capita, and which noiselessly absorbs complaints .Then if anyone works out how to take it to its limit, it arbitrarily dismisses them. I have documented proof. https://t.co/lhpKl8ebyU
Trump has pardoned a convicted ex-military officer of his acquaintance. He must now go further, and use his remaining time as President to extend Presidential pardon to all those social-national people doing hard time in Federal prison. For many, doing life sentences or long fixed terms, a pardon may be their only hope.
#Update Seven men have been bailed for their part in the maritime security incident that took place on board the Nave Andromeda off the coast of the Isle of Wight on Sunday.
Remember how the msm went mad, a few days ago, about the exciting assault by Special Boat Service [SBS] commandos dropping onto the deck of the tanker off the Isle of Wight and taking prisoner the “pirate” stowaways who had intimidated the captain and almost taken control of his ship?
I remember it too. Plastered all over Sky News, BBC News etc. Sadly, it was another propaganda exercise. Oh, there was a ship all right, and there were about 9 Nigerian stowaways, who seem to have tried to take over the ship, frightening the captain and crew. There was also that brave assault by the SBS, in which its personnel “fast-roped” from helicopters straight down onto the deck of the tanker, and then took back the ship in a matter of minutes (Sky and BBC said 9 minutes; some reports said 7). All true.
Sadly, and it is no reflection on the SBS, its men and their operation, but that was all part of the imperial hypocrisy. It was used by the Government and msm to say to the public, “look at that! We are really tough on piracy and illegal immigration! Detained by the tough guys from the SBS! That will show them!”
Not really. Look at that tweet from Hampshire Police, above, and the linked report:
“Seven men have been bailed for their part in the maritime security incident that took place on board the Nave Andromeda off the coast of the Isle of Wight on Sunday 25 October.
In other words, the invaders (the 7 noted, maybe a few others) have now all been released into the custody of the toytown Border Force. “Custody” implies (falsely) actual incarceration. No.
No illegal immigrants at all are presently being actually “detained”, in any real sense, in the UK; they are all in fact being put into hotels mothballed by reason of the crazy “Coronavirus” “measures” (effective shutdown). They are given shelter, food, clothing if necessary, and pocket-money of maybe ยฃ50 a week. Maybe more. Many homeless British people would find that acceptable, but are not given the option.
The immigration detention centres are all shut (indefinitely) supposedly because of the inflated “threat” by “the virus”.
Did the SBS really win at sea the other day? No. Not their fault, but the Nigerian migrant-invaders won. They have got what they wanted: they are in the UK, free to walk around, sheltered, fed, clothed, and even given money with which to buy celebratory drinks.
Incidentally, the msm was going mad about a family of Kurdish migrants that drowned off the coast of France. TV crews went to Dunquerque to interview their fellow migrant-invaders. They were portrayed as the unfortunate victims, the British people as oppressive for not wanting to be (further) invaded.
I heard on BBC World Service that that Kurdish family paid 24,000 Euros to smugglers to be brought to France and then given a boat (with outboard motor) with which to cross to the UK. They had sold all their possessions. All right, but I wonder how many British people in the UK could, even if they did sell all they had, raise over ยฃ20,000?
Those Kurds were not in any real sense “refugees”. They were economic migrants. In a sense, I do not “blame” them for wanting to come to Europe or the UK in particular; they obviously were trying to improve their lot. Fair enough, but we the British people are also entitled to say “No! This is our land“.
The endgame of all this is Margaret Hodge screaming denunciations on all channels at all times, her victims selected at random (perhaps some kind of lottery of leftists), and her ravings gravely reported as 'news'. Forever.
Remember that Jewish-Zionist triumphalism in the years to come. A little bit of Israel… in the UK.
If the Party is seen to so easily betray its own – how can voters be expected to trust them?
A party that loses the likes of Chris Williamson but protects the likes of Margaret Hodge – is giving a strange message indeed. pic.twitter.com/Pnjj9Z9OJa
Keir Starmer “tell Margaret Hodge“? Ha ha! Starmer does not tell the Jews anything (except what they want to hear). They tell him!
The very least that needs to be done is the disbanding of Labour friends of Israel and the expulsion of its members as they are a party within the party, a front for the Blair institution
Another sadly-deluded honest Labour member or supporter. Deluded because he obviously imagines that the Labour Party is worth saving. Why would he think that? Labour has promoted mass immigration. That alone disqualifies it. Now, Labour is again owned by the Jew-Zionist element or cabal. What about Labour entitles it to speak to or for the British people?
Really? I wonder why (((Kirsty Wark))) would have done that? It really is puzzling…
Excellent piece by Margaret Hodge but I donโt agree that this is a time to bring the Labour Party together. Itโs instead a time for polarisation & ruthlessness against the fringe who formerly controlled the party & destroyed its moral authority. https://t.co/kMgLkcfMwI
For once, perhaps surprisingly, I agree with half-Jew hypocrite Kamm. For my own reasons, though. I hope that the new “doormat” Labour leadership follows Kamm’s advice or injunction. Then Labour can fall to pieces, the result being that a real social-national movement can arise.
Britain’s toytown police in the “lockdown” (shutdown)
Sweden, that had and has no “lockdown”, no facemask nonsense, no legally-enforced “social distancing”, no closure of shops, schools or even bars…
This (below) made me laugh!
My leftist friends used to call me "neocon". Now they call me "neoliberal". On the political compass my views concise exactly with those of Gandhi and Nelson Mandela, who as it happens are my political heroes.
Gandhi, a supposed “idealist”, whose activities led to the deaths of millions, not only by reason of the Partition of 1947 but also by reason of the poverty that was created or maintained by backward economic policies for decades after Gandhi’s own death.
Mandela, a semi-trained African lawyer, as thick as two short planks. A would-be terrorist who was imprisoned for his part in a conspiracy to form a terrorist “army” and to create a race war in South Africa in the 1960s. Mandela, who was incapable of running a state, and who left behind a country sliding slowly to chaos and civil war.
Nice “political heroes”…
To all the BBC presenters and staff moaning about not being able to express a political opinion or virtue signal on social media: If you want to do that then go and work in the private sector and prove your value somewhere youโre not being paid for by taxpayers to be impartial.
astonished that the PM said there would be no checks and now itโs clear there will be checks https://t.co/XYQqvNfKv4
— Friend of Deep State ๐ (@PickardJE) May 13, 2020
Why would you be surprised that a psychopathic liar and part-Jew public entertainer (merely posing as “Prime Minister”) would…lie? It’s what he does.
Well, who would have thought it, #BorisJohnson has #Lied about something else. Now border checks on goods moving over the Irish sea. Add that to a long, long list……. probably longer that can be comfortably fitted on the side of a bus. OR…… What is Dom trying to deflect?
Customs in the Irish Sea will lead rapidly to a united Ireland. Which might well lead to Scotland separating from the UK. Johnstonโs lies might have significant historic impact. https://t.co/jeMRMgeVNj
— David Miller T.O. (@iamdavidmiller) May 14, 2020
…particularly when, only yesterday, the UK Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Gerry Adams. Do we see where this is going? I think that we do.
Indeed, it now seems that Boris-idiot secretly agreed to the “border in the Irish Sea” as long ago as October 2019!
The “Communist” campaign of subversion that started as an adjunct to Soviet Intelligence and was noted by such as Golitsyn (albeit over-valued by him, and to some extent distorted), became so-called “Cultural Marxism”, infecting society from the 1960s. It was particularly powerful in infecting students across Europe, North America, Australasia (and, to a lesser extent, South Africa).
Those students became prime ministers, Cabinet ministers, judges, heads of TV stations, radio current affairs programmes, as well as journalists and talking heads etc. A few names from the UK? Tony Blair, Cherie Blair, Alistair Darling, Jack Dromey, Jack Straw, and many many others. Few if any were “Soviet agents” (as far as I know, not even ghastly Jack Dromey, later a Blairite “Labour” MP, who attended the 1970s mercenaries’ “trial” in Angola as a kind of “socialist” vulture, sub nom “observer”).
Few of those then-young people were even pro-Soviet, not least because “Cultural Marxism” broke free from its conspiratorial Soviet origins as the Soviet Union started to slowly decay and eventually collapse.
It could be said that what is called, inter alia, “Cultural Marxism”, is now just another NWO cultural current. It has little or nothing to do with any form of “socialism”, that’s for sure.
Where Golitsyn went wrong was in assuming that the “headwaters” of “Cultural Marxism” lay in Sovietism, when in fact they lay on higher ground, in the groups that developed (and named) the “New World Order” or NWO. Those same groups were those who fostered the Soviet Union under Lenin in the first place.
In other words, the former secret operatives who helped to collapse Soviet and Eastern European socialism (in the Soviet Union, Romania, Poland etc) were not communists disguising themselves as something else, but a metamorphosis of communists or socialists turning into something else, while still coming under the overall and yet covert control of the NWO powers on the grand scale.
Russia is not in control of the play as it is acted out; neither is the USA, as such. The NWO is pulling the strings, often through “Zionist Occupation Governments” [“ZOG”].
The aim is to form a one-world regime, composed mainly of raceless, cultureless serfs, ruled over by ZOG and, beyond ZOG, the NWO powers. Below the ruling levels, a mass of untermenschen is promoted by the “governments” and the contaminated msm, drowning out the true voices of Europe’s future.
Tweets seen
Seems that some Americans have never heard of “tax” and, in particular, “income tax”. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez’s tweet is very dry in its humour…
If only there were some public fund billionaires could pay into along with everyone else that helps fund our infrastructure, hospitals, and public systems all at once.
It could even be a modest % of what they earn every year. We could have an agency collect it and everything https://t.co/g0vI45xnYG
Unfortunately, while in principle it is far more efficient for tax monies to go into one fund, or what in the UK are usually termed “central funds”, in practice this has flaws and drawbacks. It tends to mean that governments decide to use some of the tax monies gathered for all sorts of misconceived projects and grandiose ideas, while the foundations of society are ill-funded. It also means that those who pay tax (one way or another, and to some extent, everyone) lose any feeling of connection between what they pay in tax and what they see being funded and/or underfunded.
It might well be worth the loss of a certain amount of notional fiscal efficiency to both tie and be seen to tie tax monies raised to specific expenditures. For example, “Road Tax”, or “Vehicle Tax” is raised from motorists and others on the misleading basis (apart from it being compulsory) that the monies raised will pay for roads. Well, some may go to that, but probably less than is raised. The rest? To “central funds”.
“National Insurance” is another and similar example.
I am sure that people would more readily accept taxation if they knew that X% was going to go to the NHS directly, perhaps by taking X% off income tax and having a new “NHS Tax” at X% (or whatever).
The above proposal would also make more rational the election-time arguments about money, taxes, and services.
There is a limit to how far funding of NHS, roads etc can or should be localized, however. There is always the danger that poorer areas will be hugely impoverished if dependent only on a local tax base. However, a degree of localism is, in my view, good. It enables people to relate easier to what needs funding and to the sources of funding.
Why get rid of the one channel thatโs dedicated to culture, art, history etc? Quality educational programming is so important and should be funded just as much (if not more) then entertainment. What a shame..
…and to “balance” all the sensible opinions (with which I agree), let’s have the obligatory dim SNP tweet of the day:
I donโt watch BBC, ITV, SKY……..all foreign media to us in Scotland!
— KizzieWiz@KizzieWiz..ALBA Party (@KizzieWiz) May 14, 2020
Ah, yes, UK/English TV is “foreign” to a dim SNP partisan. Funny how these Scottish “nationalists” have (certainly Sturgeon’s SNP leadership have) no objection to the Jewish/Zionist lobby, no objection to mass immigration of non-Europeans into the UK (or even Scotland itself), no objection to Scotland being ruled or partly-ruled by the EU, NATO, the USA/NWO, “international” banks and financial institutions etc…Fake “nationalism”.
Lord Reith laid down his famous dictum for the BBC: “Inform, educate, and entertain“, presumably in that order. That dictum has been watered down to the extent that the BBC usually now fails to inform, or deliberately misinforms; it scarcely “educates” at all, even on BBC2, though it does —to some extent— on apparently-doomed BBC Four. As for “entertain”, it still tries to do that, mostly unsuccessfully, as far as I am concerned. Lowest common denominator.
The fact that opinionated football idiot Gary Lineker is (as I read) paid nearly ยฃ2 million a year makes the BBC worse than a mere absurdity.
The BBC pays millions to unpleasant “comedians” who trash everything worthwhile: Jo Brand, Jimmy Carr, David Baddiel; and many others.
The BBC is a negative force in national life now, in every respect. This latest insult to those of its viewers (and “licence”-payers) who have a mentality above gutter-level proves that it should now be shut down. It is not true “public service broadcasting” now, is an expensive anachronism and also a nest of anti-British propaganda.
Tweets by Peter Hitchens re. “the current situation”
Am I, @mwqa_limited? Have to read the Coronavirus Act? Did you note that it was passed without a vote? Do you not see that opposition to the government has been marginalised? How do you think freedom dies in a formerly free country? https://t.co/HV8DBOvURx
Excellent from @Sherelle_E_J Sherelle Jacobs @Telegraph: https://t.co/tMXOC7WcfT 'BBC has …pumped out No10's basic pro-lockdown propaganda message without question,genuinely convinced that they're holding the Government to account by spinning news items about a "No10 shambles".
I also very much doubt it it sweetie. Thatโs why I use my freedom to mock the powerful while I still can. @mwqa_limited I sense free speech hasnโt long to go. https://t.co/7god0jUEXu
Seems very likely that Covid-19 was present in Western Europe at least as early as December 2019 (one such case has been identified with certainty in France) and has since been quietly following the normal bell curve of such things, regardless of state panics. https://t.co/6RTupUvoCi
“A team of international researchers say mouthwash could destroy the outermost layer or ‘envelope’ of the virus, preventing its replication in the mouth and throat.” [Daily Mail]
“Spending time in the fresh air and sunshine can reduce someone’s risk of catching theย coronavirus, a scientific adviser to the Government has said…Professor Alan Penn, a member of SAGE, the Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, reassured that those who flock to the parks that the risk of catching the virus outside is lower…He said: ‘The science suggests that being outside in sunlight, with good ventilation, are both highly protective against transmission of the virus.’ Other scientists say they ‘totally agree’ with Professor Penn and advocate spending more time outdoors, where the virus is less likely to survive.”
So much for the “Stay at home, Protect the NHS, Save lives” nonsense-propaganda that has been pumped out by idiots to idiots for months now…
I wonder how many virtue-signalling serfs will be out “clapping for the NHS” this evening? Where I live, not many; I have only ever seen one or two clapping. We now know that in fact NHS staff face little if any more risk from Coronavirus than do the general population. The risky jobs seem to be those done by care staff, taxi drivers and, oddest of all, security guards.
Evening foray
Needed a few things from Waitrose. Far more traffic on the roads than seen for maybe 6-8 weeks. In Waitrose itself, still the ludicrous “social distancing”, which seems to have been ingrained in many; a couple of people jumped clear as I, carrier of the Plague (as it might be) approached. One vacant-looking woman was wearing a —clearly home-made– facemask.
In fact, there were few shoppers and no obvious shortage of any goods. One “interesting” event occurred. I was there just before closing, and got stuck behind a woman buying a mountain of shopping while also having an extended conversation about trivia with the cashier. While standing waiting for my turn to be dealt with, an announcement over the PA system: “Waitrose closes at 8 pm, at which time all staff will stop what they are doing and clap for our carers”! In other words, what started as a genuine and spontaneous gesture in a few places has become a socially-mandated, Government-promoted and corporately-enforced and compelled act.
As a matter of fact, I left the Waitrose building a minute before 2000 hrs, and was still in the car park when the designated clap-time arrived. I noticed that only the black-clad Waitrose marshals, two of them (I call them Handmaid’s Tale militia) actually stood outside the main doors and clapped for 10 seconds or so. I also heard a police or ambulance siren, which was probably not co-incidental.
En route back to Schloss Millard a minute or two later, I saw one family of 5 standing outside a house, having presumably clapped. I later heard that some idiot let off some fireworks somewhere in the area.
Das ist’s. Time to dispense with the “clapathon”, I think.
Any fatality from cancer, coronavirus or any illness is tragic, but we've become so obsessed with the fight against Coronavirus we've neglected these other patients.
This simply has to change or it will cost countless more lives.
— Professor Karol Sikora (@ProfKarolSikora) May 14, 2020
Lionel Shriver excellent here. Yet the Spectator still teeters on the edge of full-scale resistance. Where are you @douglaskmurray? If this isn't the madness of crowds, what is? . https://t.co/5CW12fxPU3 via @spectator
Something else worth noting is that below, about “social distancing” being “here to stay” (or so says thick Ugandan Asian Priti Patel, the inept would-be spy for Israel who is now, laughably, a Cabinet minister for the second time)…
Entirely believable, alas @sallycopper. As I have said, unless the government can be made to admit its policy was wrong, we are stuck with this forever. https://t.co/VXEUAOT0aD
For those who have never heard of her, Jo Brand is a terminally unfunny comedienne, the sort of artiste the BBC have specialized in for the past 20-30 years.
Jo Brand is highly political and supports the Labour Party.
Recently, Jo Brand made comments that she excused later as “a joke”, to the effect that Nigel Farage and other basically (even mildly) nationalist political candidates should have acid thrown over them. Wikipedia has the following description of the matter:
“In June 2019, Brand was featured in the BBC Radio 4 comedy showย Heresy, after a number of ย European election candidatesย had been doused withย milkshakesย during campaign walkabouts the previous month. Brand said “Why bother with a milkshake when you could get someย battery acid?” She later added: “Thatโs just me, sorry, Iโm not gonna do it, itโs purely a fantasy, but I think milk shakes are pathetic, I honestly do. Sorry.”[32]ย The BBC later defended Brand, explaining “the jokes made onย Heresyย are deliberately provocative as the title implies” and that they were “not intended to be taken seriously.”[33]ย Acting Prime Ministerย Theresa Mayย said the BBC should explain why a Jo Brand joke about throwing battery acid was “appropriate content” for broadcast[34]ย and the BBC later announced that the remark would be edited out of any future broadcasts. Theย Metropolitan Policeย confirmed that it had “received an allegation of incitement to violence that was reported to the MPS on 13 June”.[35]ย and that they were investigating the matter.[36][37]ย Appearing at an event inย Henley, Oxfordshire, on the same day, the comedian was said to have apologised for making the joke, saying โLooking back it probably was somewhat a crass and ill-judged joke that might upset people.” It was understood that the allegation reported to the police was not made byย Nigel Farageย or theย Brexit Party.ย Ofcomย said it has received 65 complaints about the episode ofย Heresy.[38]ย The police dropped the investigation two days later.” [Wikipedia]
Jo Brand was talking (no doubt well-paid for it too) on a BBC radio show hosted by the Jewess Victoria Coren.
Afterwards, the BBC removed the clip from public access. The Jew comic David Baddiel (the show’s “creator”, again no doubt very well paid for all of this degenerate nonsense) said that the BBC was “cowardly” in removing the comments.
Strangely enough, Baddiel is often heard complaining about jokes….about Jews.
Jo Brand is obviously a disgusting woman (I thought that a long time prior to the recent “joke” and still think it). Britain is in the midst of a spate of horrible acid (and strong alkali) attacks, in which victims have been killed or seriously injured and/or disfigured for life by criminal attackers.
These types of attack were unknown until mass immigration destroyed Britain. Even the massaged statistics of the System say that white people (still the large majority of the population) only perpetrated about 30% of the attacks; non-whites, despite being only a minority of the population, perpetrated 70% of such attacks. White people (i.e. real British people) were the victims in about 50% of cases. This type of crime has been imported from other parts of the world, and the UK courts are only now, belatedly, starting to hand down suitably condign sentences.
Coming back to the repulsive Jo Brand, she thinks that throwing milkshakes over political opponents is “just pathetic”, by which she plainly means that the attacks do not hurt or damage enough. How could someone with her attitudes ever have been a psychiatric nurse, as she is said to have been for a decade?
In fact, the “milkshakes” (which are mostly not even milk-based but are a glutinous mixture sold to the masses by McDonalds and the like), do considerable damage to clothing, and more importantly are an affront to the victim’s dignity and rights as human being and as citizen. Which, of course, is why the perpetrators do it. The attackers are always smug, narcissistic “me too” types like Jo Brand. They are always Remain whiners, alwaysย pro-mass immigration, and usually have jobs in the mass media or public services (when not students).
To imply, as Jo Brand does, that to throw a fast-food “milk”-shake over someone is nothing, and by no means painful enough, is to incite violence for political motives. There is no other explanation for it.
As to Brand’s “apology”, designed as a fig leaf so that BBC etc can carry on giving her (via her tax-dodging private company) licence-payers’ money so that she can carry on boring and repelling the public, it carries no weight whatever. Would any “ordinary” (in fact, far more valuable) citizen be let off so easily by the police on the plea that “I only said that acid should be thrown because I was joking”? I think not.
Let us look at a few people whom the police or professional bodies have not let off for making remarks, or for singing amusing songs etc:
Alison Chabloz sang amusing satirical songs about, inter alia, the many proven “holocaust” fakes.
She was prosecuted and eventually convicted, though is appealing her conviction and sentence; see
Jez Turner made a humorous speech in Whitehall in 2015, during which he suggested that Jews should be (again) ejected from the UK. Prosecuted in 2018 and actually imprisoned (!) for a year (released on licence after 6 months);
Vlogger Mark Meechan, aka “Count Dankula”, was convicted in Scotland of having taught his pug dog to give the “Hitler” salute, then posting the film online. Fined ยฃ800 and refused permission (needed in Scotland) to appeal; the fact that I regard him (and other “alt-right” vloggers) as complete wastes of space does not change the fact that he should never have been prosecuted;
I myself was questioned by the police after politically-motivated Jews complained that tweets I was said to have posted were “grossly offensive” (they could not bag me, though, and I continue to post as I see fit, though not on Twitter: the Jews managed to procure my expulsion from that platform); in a related case, effectively the same pack of Jews (though notionally different because using a different organizational name), had me disbarred
The Jo Brand case is another item in the indictment against the BBC, the degenerate msm milieu in general (cf. the Gove confession) and UK society today. There must be, some day soon, a chistka or purge (a “cultural revolution”, if you like) to destroy msm degeneracy and its practitioners and profiteers, to wipe out evil of this kind and restore European culture to TV, radio, Press and book publishing. Online too.
In the meantime, I wait to see whether Jo Brand herself will be confronted by a milkshake. I wonder whether, in that event, she will see the “joke”?
News reports and what people have been saying
First, a half-hearted defence of Jo Brand from (yet another) Jewess, this time in The Guardian:
and here [below] is the Jew Baddiel defending Jo Brand (and of course his show, from which he makes yet more money from the BBC…and as he will, no doubt, in future); but where was he when myย free speech was trashed? Where was he when Alison Chabloz was persecuted and prosecuted for singing songs?
โI am suspicious of outrage, because I think, โare you really outraged? Are you really stomping about in your house furious, or are you just wanting to be heard on social media?โโ – Comedian David @Baddiel on the reaction to Jo Brand's battery acid joke.#newsnightpic.twitter.com/SpT7IGJsAw
…and (what a shock) here is Ricky Gervais, another one who has never stood up for Alison Chabloz etc (though admittedly he did so for the waste of space “Count Dankula”, and his silly saluting dog film….); and, on another but not directly relevant point, I do like his support for animal welfare etc.
It's obvious to me that Jo Brand would never actually throw battery acid on anyone. It's even more obvious that she would never waste any of her fucking milkshake.
Yet another System-subsidized “humorist” (apparently— I’ve never heard of the idiot) below:
"Can you imagine the reaction if I had said the same thing as Jo Brand?" says Nigel Farage, a non-comedian who has non-jokingly endorsed the use of rifles in front of non-joking crowds in non-joking rooms full of non-joking people who non-jokingly defend rape jokes.
That one [above] seems to ignore the fact that both milkshake and acid attacks occur all too often; semi-conservative politicians like Nigel Farage are in fact not “picking up rifles”.
Here’s another one, Gyles Brandreth , defending Jo Brand. Funny how these bastards all make large amounts of money from the BBC…
Talk about over-reaction! Jo Brand is a big-hearted & brilliant person – and her joke was OBVIOUSLY a joke. (I heard it at the time.) https://t.co/DdmsSTr1k0
…and [below] yet another defender of Jo Brand: Jew, atheist, gay, and…yes, as expected (I had to look up the bastard on Wikipedia) another who makes his income from BBC work. The BBC is now a corrupt mess and should be dropped down a black hole.
And here is another member of the London msm club, Adam Boulton, of Sky News. Strange, I must have missed his defence of, say, Alison Chabloz and her songs (or, for that matter, his defence of my tweets of years ago). That’s right, Adam Boulton did not defend freedom of expression. “They” would not have approved…
No. Jo Brand is a decent and funny woman. She miscued with the way she expressed herself and has apologised. She was not trying to advocate violence just as Danny Baker had no racist intention. Try not being so priggish. We all make mistakes and pay the price. https://t.co/vDl1XPA0NF
[Update, 4 September 2020. Seems that I was wrong; the BBC has now thrown a few crumbs her way: “In 2020, she and fellow comedianย Fern Bradyย started a podcast for theย BBCย calledย Wheel of Misfortune, which is obviously based in [sic] the Wheel of Fortune.” [Wikipedia]]
“Count Dankula”/Mark Meechan [below] exposes the hypocrisy of those who defend Jo Brand but not, er, him! Fair enough, but where were you, Mr. Meechan, when Alison Chabloz was facing persecution and prosecution? Where were you, on your precious “social media”, when I myself was traduced in the msm? Nowhere. So that’s where you are and will stay: nowhere!
I'm honestly really enjoying all the hypocrisy coming from people who came after me but are defending Jo Brand.
"Jo is a comedian and free speech in comedy is important"
"What about Dankula?"
"Well you see that's different because *verbal diarrhea*"
This one (below) apparently reviews newspapers on Sky News sometimes. Seems that she cannot reach even their usual low standards, never having heard (it seems) of Alison Chabloz, Mark Meechan, or the fellow whose family was subjected to a police raid because they made a joking remark about a Guy Fawkes bonfire in their own garden. Or are edgy “jokes” OK unless they mention Jews and Gypsies?
Here, below, the columnist Allison Pearson answers the tweet of Jew Zionist scribbler Hugo Rifkind:
I donโt mind what Jo Brand said. I do mind that the double standard is: Leftwing makes nasty remark: oh, free speech, no one cares Rightwing does same: Hate speech! Sinister! Fascist! Get them sacked. https://t.co/aoPK8m278p
In fact, it seems that a great number of people do not approve of the so-called “joke” by Jo Brand (the bitch wouldn’t know a joke if it splattered all over her…). Strangely enough, few if any of her critics make money out of the BBC…
Here is the moment Jo Brand mocked Carl Benjamin for making an offensive joke promoting a police investigation. "I think it shocking that politics has been reduced to vile personal attacks" she added. pic.twitter.com/0E9xthuvjc
I just think #jobrand and others who inhabit these right-on patronising middle class circles and say things just to get cheap laughs from their metropolitan elite pals, should think about what they are saying and maybe realise โitโs not all about themโhttps://t.co/mYQgwePD0h
and here’s another BBC hypocrite: Jimmy Carr. Makes millions (literally) from the BBC and other msm, was exposed as a tax-dodger in 2012, but tries to pose as both somehow “radical” and as terribly “edgy”.
Here’s another example of Jimmy Carr humour, laughing at British service personnel who have been badly-injured:
“In October 2009, Carr received criticism from several Sunday tabloid newspapers for a joke he made about British soldiers who had lost limbs inย Iraqย andย Afghanistan, saying that the UK would have a strong team in theย London 2012 Paralympic Games.[34]ย Carr defended his own joke as “totally acceptable” in an interview withย The Guardian.”
[Wikipedia]
Why is he still around? The little bastard only jokes at the expense of those who cannot fight back. Why has no serving soldier or ex-military person *explained* the matter to Jimmy Carr?
Alexander Nekrassov not mincing his words! Go, Sasha!
Jokes aside that ugly leftist cunt #JoBrand did incite hatred against Farage and his party. Mind you, the whole #BBC network incites hatred daily against whites, conservatives, followers of 3 major faiths, normality, sanity and common sense. Disgusting cesspit of far-left filth.
— Alexander Nekrassov (@StirringTrouble) June 13, 2019
Nekrassov with another point which applies not only to Jo Brand but a hundred or more others:
A stray thought: does Jo Brand fantasize about acid being thrown on people she dislikes, or with whom she disagrees, because her own face already looks as though acid has been thrown on it?
Below, rent-a-mouth BBC ignoramus James O’Brien defends disgusting Jo Brand. Apparently, it’s OK to “joke” about Nigel Farage having battery acid thrown at him, because “it was on a comedy show”. Funny, I never saw O’Brien and his type stand up for Alison Chabloz and her comedic songs…Must be that it’s OK to joke about acid being thrown —on a named person who has already had other stuff thrown on him recently— but not OK to lampoon the proven Jewish frauds and fakes of the “holocaust” mythus…(we really are just “occupied” in this poor country…)
[Update, 4 November 2021:ย Looks as though the BBC had O’Brien delete his tweet. No surprise there; I would only be surprised had O’Brien the courage of his convictions].
…and now look at who’s looking for trouble!
Tim so you are clear. I would pour whatever I can get my hands on, on an avowed White Supremacist. My ancestors died fighting this shit. I donโt give two bloody hoots what your apologist arse thinks about it. (thatโs me being polite) You lay down with dogs you get fleas. https://t.co/njmNNmzq8p
His ancestors “died fighting” what he is pleased to call “this shit” (meaning white civilization), he says. Thus speaks David Lammy MP, barrister of Lincoln’s Inn, to which I myself belonged before the Jew Zionist cabals procured my disbarment in 2016, an injustice no doubt applauded by barrister Lammy (he only practised actively at the Bar for a few years, and at a very low level, doing the simplest criminal cases).
When did his “ancestors” “die fighting”? In African tribal wars, or attacking the police at the 1980s Broadwater Farm riots; or in more recent gang activity? I do not know the bastard’s background in detail, so cannot guess. Lammy seems to want a fight himself, judging by the inflammatory nature of his tweets. He obviously has a violent nature. In fact he supports corporal punishment too. He is out of place in the UK, in Europe.
I think that at one time Lammy hoped to become the first black Attorney-General, but was beaten to it by Patricia Scotland (who was rubbish, and went on on to be rubbish at the Commonwealth Secretariat as well, but that is another issue). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Scotland#Expenses_controversy . The price of so-called “diversity”? Labour’s travails since 2009 and his own odd behaviour seem to have put paid to Lammy’s ministerial ambitions. He wasย (briefly) a Minister of State (non-Cabinet) under crazed bully and psycho case Gordon Brown, but now is just a backbencher and will stay one. Still, not a bad little earner for someone whose huge ignorance is regularly highlighted.
One has to question whether a society like that of the UK can survive, when its key and/or prestige institutions prefer such as David Lammy to someone like me, when the BBC and its highly-paid drones pay lip-service to incitement to horrific violence, and when those guilty have mostly so far got away without having been taken down.
Cowardly #JoBrand moves from encouraging people to post shit through letterboxes to #acidattacks – literally & legally terrorism, but don't expect PC Plod to lift a finger. If it makes you angry, stop paying the #BBC licence fee!https://t.co/7ANhESvxee
Never say never: cretinous “diversity hire” David Lammy is now Foreign Secretary! What an insult to the white people who built this country! He is a total idiot, and totally ignorant. Just a puppet on a stick, marked “diversity”.
Ian Robert Millard 